BETA

3 Amendments of Petru Constantin LUHAN related to 2012/2075(INI)

Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. PConsiders that the time currently taken to mobilise the fund is unacceptably long and accordingly points to the need to improve the effectiveness and speed of the administrative procedures required for its mobilisation, which entail intervention by three European institutions before approval can be granted, with the result that these procedures excessively delay and prolong the time taken to assist Member States affected by a disaster, thereby falling short of the results hoped for;
2012/10/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. RegretConsiders that opposition from a number of Member States, fearing that significant changes to the legal basis of this instrument would entail higher financial outgoings, is unjustified and has restricted the adjustment of the 2002 Regulation1 to a number of clarifications and an attempt to improve its operability; points out that, regrettably, disasters in the European Union's regions have increased significantly in number, nature, severity and intensity since the Fund was created;
2012/10/17
Committee: REGI
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Wonders whether a clearer and more precise definition of the concept of disasters might help to reduce the scepticism felt by many of the Member States that are opposed to in-depth reform of this Community instrument;deleted
2012/10/17
Committee: REGI