22 Amendments of Petra KAMMEREVERT related to 2011/2313(INI)
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas a uniform standard for durable, unambiguous identification of audiovisual works, which, however, would not necessitate or bring about any ‘Deep Packet Inspection’ or other forms of online monitoring, would make the traceability and licensing of such works easier for the IDA database (database of the International Documentation on Audiovisual works) and the International Performer Database and thereby improve the sale and administration of rights, especially in Europe;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas European broadcasting companiers provide the funding for more than 80 % of the original European audiovisual programmes produced and play a crucial role in the promotion and protection of cultural diversity;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas the development ofpossibilities already exist today for pan- European licences on a voluntary basis may be one of the avenues to explore, although due recognition must be given to the fact that the exploitation and consumption of works takes place within defined national anEuropean audiovisual landscape is shaped by a variety of cultures and languages and therefore the exploitation and consumption of works according to demand takes place within an established cultural sphere or within defined linguistic areas;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
Recital I
I. whereas specific action needs to be taken to preserve the European cinematographicaudiovisual heritage, particularly by encouraging the digitisation of content;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas it is absolutely essential to preserve the principle of net neutralitynet neutrality in information and communication networks and guarantee the technology-neutral design of media platforms and players in order to ensure the availability of audiovisual services;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L a (new)
Recital L a (new)
La. also whereas a large number of violations of authors’ rights or related intellectual property rights are based on understandable need of a potential audience for new audiovisual content under simple and fairly priced conditions and this demand has not yet been sufficiently fulfilled;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
Recital O
O. whereas the effectiveness of collective management companies needs to be improvedre is an urgent need for the European Commission to finally provide the legal act on collective rights management and collective management companies in order to increase confidence in collective management companies by introducing measures aimed at increasing efficiency and significantly improving their transparency and good governance;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that consideration should be given to introducing innovative alternative micropayment systems, such as payment by text message, for legal platforms providinge necessity of developing alternative and innovative alternative micropayment systems for legal online services, so as to that will facilitate theiraccess and use by consumers;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recalls that, for the creation of a single internal digital market in Europe, it is essential to establish pan-European regulations on the collective management of authors’ rights and related intellectual property rights so as to put a stop to the continuing various amendments to legislation in the Member States that make cross-border rights management increasingly difficult;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the need to create legal certainty and bring legislation into line with the realities of the digital age by proposingto the effect that the applicable law for the management of rights should be that of the country where an enterprise carries out its main business and where it generates its main revenue;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Urges the European Commission to provide the legal act it announced on collective rights management without delay; this act should include regulations on statutory permission for collecting societies, minimum requirements for the granting of licences, ensuring transparency in charges and mutual recognition contracts, the admissibility of licensing agreements, compulsory administration, the prohibition of discrimination, the organisational structure, minimum standards in regulatory law, general principles in determining charges and quality control for collecting societies and should guarantee independent, efficient dispute resolution;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Stresses that simplified clearance and aggregation, especially of online music rights, would promote the internal market and urges the European Commission to take this into consideration as appropriate in the legal act on collective rights management that has been announced;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 c (new)
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Points out that the continuing convergence of the media, not only in terms of authors’ rights, but also in terms of entertainment law, requires new problem-solving approaches; urges the European Commission to check to what extent various regulations for linear and non-linear services in Directive 2010/13/EU on audiovisual media services are still up-to-date, taking the latest technological developments into consideration;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 d (new)
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5d. Believes that restrictions on advertising for linear children’s ranges, on news and information programmes, are reasonable despite the increasingly obsolete distinction between linear and non-linear selections; suggests, however, that consideration be given to new forms of cross-programme and cross-platform clearing systems, with the aid of which interest could be awoken in high-quality content, which would also increase the linear programme quality and the online variety without burdening the revenue of private broadcasters;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for Internet users to be afforded greater legal certainty when using streamed services, but suggests that consideration should be given to how to block access to pay platforms offering unauthorisedonline services;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Suggests, however, that measures be taken to remove from pay platforms any content that the provider, who intends to make a profit from the content offered, is not authorised to use;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Takes the view that the introduction of tracking and tracing systems within electronic information and communication networks for the purpose of detecting breaches of author’s rights and related intellectual property rights would constitute a disproportionate infringement of the fundamental freedom of communication of EU citizens and therefore rejects it;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that permanent and unique identification of works in accordance with the ISAN standarda uniform standard, which does not require or bring about ‘Deep Packet Inspection’ or other forms of online monitoring, would facilitate their free circulation, and calls for that standard to be used systematically;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Maintains that the best means of guaranteeing decent remuneration for rights holders is to implement inter-branch agreements between producers, authors and performersauthors and holders of related intellectual property rights is to implement and increase the attractiveness of collective rights management systems, which also allow for extended collective rights administration;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Reminds Member States of their obligations as outlined in Article 13(1) of Directive 2010/13/EU (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) and calls upon the Commission to provide a detailed report on the current status of implementation as per Article 13(3) to the European Parliament without delay;