BETA


2011/2313(INI) Online distribution of audiovisual works in the European Union

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CULT CAVADA Jean-Marie (icon: PPE PPE) KAMMEREVERT Petra (icon: S&D S&D), LØKKEGAARD Morten (icon: ALDE ALDE), TRÜPEL Helga (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion JURI BORYS Piotr (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion ITRE BADIA I CUTCHET Maria (icon: S&D S&D) Ivo BELET (icon: PPE PPE), Sajjad KARIM (icon: ECR ECR), Jens ROHDE (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2012/12/19
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2012/09/11
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2012/09/11
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the online distribution of audiovisual works in the European Union.

Legal content, accessibility and collective rights management: Parliament stresses the need to make legal content more attractive, and to improve the online availability of audiovisual works, including both subtitled works and works in all the official languages of the EU. Digital services, such as video streaming, should be made available to all EU citizens irrespective of the Member State in which they are located. Members call on the Commission to request that European digital companies remove geographical controls (e.g. IP address blocking) across the Union and allow the purchase of digital services from outside the consumer’s Member State of origin. It asks the Commission to draft an analysis of the application of the Cable and Satellite Directive to digital distribution.

Parliament suggests adopting a comprehensive approach at EU level which should involve greater cooperation between rights‑holders, online distribution platforms and internet service providers, so as to facilitate user-friendly and competitive access to audiovisual content. It stresses the importance of net neutrality in order to guarantee equal access to high‑speed networks, which is crucial to the quality of legitimate online audiovisual services.

Members emphasise that the digital divide between Member States or regions of the EU represents a serious barrier to the development of the digital single market. They call, therefore, for the expansion of broadband internet access throughout the EU with a view to stimulating access to online services and new technologies. Members observe that the development of cross-border services is entirely possible, provided that business platforms are prepared to acquire, by contractual means, the rights to exploit one or more territories, since it must be remembered that territorial systems are natural markets in the audiovisual sector.

On collective management, Members call on the Commission to present a legislative initiative for the collective management of copyright , aimed at ensuring better accountability, transparency and governance on the part of collective rights management societies, along with efficient dispute resolution mechanisms, and at clarifying and simplifying licensing systems in the music sector. They stress the need to operate a clear distinction between licensing practices for different types of content, notably between audiovisual/cinematographic and musical works. The report requires an analysis of whether the principle of mutual recognition could be applied to digital goods in the same manner as to physical goods.

Unauthorised use: Parliament calls on the Commission to afford internet users legal certainty when they are using streamed services and to consider, in particular, ways to prevent the use of payment systems and the funding of such services through advertising on pay platforms offering unauthorised downloading and streaming services. It calls on Member States to promote respect for authors' and neighbouring rights and to combat the provision of unauthorised content.

Where legal alternatives do exist, online copyright infringement remains an issue and therefore the legal online availability of copyrighted cultural material needs to be supplemented with smarter online enforcement of copyright.

Remuneration: Members maintain that it is essential to guarantee authors and performers remuneration that is fair and proportional to all forms of exploitation of their works, especially online exploitation, and therefore calls upon the Member States to ban buyout contracts, which contradict this principle. They call on the Commission urgently to present a study considering disparities in the different remuneration mechanisms for authors and performers which are in use at the national level, in order to draw up a list of best practices. Furthermore, they want the bargaining position of authors and performers vis-à-vis producers to be rebalanced by providing authors and performers with an unwaivable right to remuneration for all forms of exploitation of their works, including ongoing remuneration where they have transferred their exclusive 'making available' right to a producer. Members maintain that the best means of guaranteeing decent remuneration for rights‑holders is by offering a choice, as preferred, among collective bargaining agreements (including agreed standard contracts), extended collective licences and collective management organisations.

Licensing: the resolution points out that multi-territorial or pan-European licensing mechanisms should remain voluntary and that linguistic and cultural differences between Member States, along with variations in national rules unrelated to copyright law, carry their own specific challenges. Members believe, therefore, that a flexible approach regarding pan-European licensing must be adopted, while protecting rights‑holders and progressing towards the digital single market. They take the view that, if sustainable multi-territorial licensing can be encouraged in the digital single market for audiovisual works, this should facilitate market-driven initiatives.

Interoperability: Parliament calls on Member States to ensure that collective rights management is based on effective, functional and interoperable systems. It calls on the Commission to consider ways to encourage network operators to standardise their technical tools and reverse the current trend of removing responsibility from these operators regarding consumer protection, implementation of intellectual property rights and ensuring Internet privacy.

Furthermore, Members stress that consideration should be given to applying a reduced rate of VAT to the digital distribution of cultural goods and services in order to eliminate the discrepancies between online and offline services. They take the view that the application of reduced VAT rates for online cultural content sold by a provider established in the EU to a consumer resident in the EU would boost the attractiveness of digital platforms.

Protection and promotion of audiovisual works: Parliament calls on the Commission:

to find mechanisms for encouraging access to archived audiovisual material held by Europe’s film heritage institutions; to promote solutions aimed at supporting the digitisation, preservation and educational availability of these works, including across borders.

Education: Members stress the importance of promoting digital skills and media literacy for all EU citizens, and also that consumers should be properly informed about any issues relating to intellectual property rights that may arise when using file-sharing services in the context of cloud-computing services.

MEDIA 2014-2020: lastly, Parliament stresses that it is vital for MEDIA to continue to exist as a specific programme focusing solely on the audiovisual sector.

Documents
2012/09/11
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2012/07/25
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the own-initiative report by Jean-Marie CAVADA (EPP, FR) on the online distribution of audiovisual works in the European Union.

Legal content, accessibility and collective rights management : the committee stresses the need to make legal content more attractive, and to improve the online availability of audiovisual works, including both subtitled works and works in all the official languages of the EU. Digital services, such as video streaming, should be made available to all EU citizens irrespective of the Member State in which they are located. Members call on the Commission to request that European digital companies remove geographical controls (e.g. IP address blocking) across the Union and allow the purchase of digital services from outside the consumer’s Member State of origin. It asks the Commission to draft an analysis of the application of the Cable and Satellite Directive to digital distribution.

The committee suggests adopting a comprehensive approach at EU level which should involve greater cooperation between rights‑holders, online distribution platforms and internet service providers, so as to facilitate user-friendly and competitive access to audiovisual content. It stresses the importance of net neutrality in order to guarantee equal access to high‑speed networks, which is crucial to the quality of legitimate online audiovisual services.

Members emphasise that the digital divide between Member States or regions of the EU represents a serious barrier to the development of the digital single market. They call, therefore, for the expansion of broadband internet access throughout the EU with a view to stimulating access to online services and new technologies.

On collective management, Members call on the Commission to present a legislative initiative for the collective management of copyright, aimed at ensuring better accountability, transparency and governance on the part of collective rights management societies, along with efficient dispute resolution mechanisms, and at clarifying and simplifying licensing systems in the music sector. They stress the need to operate a clear distinction between licensing practices for different types of content, notably between audiovisual/cinematographic and musical works.

On the question of convergence of the media , Members call for new solutions to be found, not only in terms of authors ’ rights, but also in terms of entertainment law and urge the European Commission to check to what extent various regulations for linear and non-linear services in Directive 2010/13/EU on audiovisual media services are still up-to-date, taking the latest technological developments into consideration. They suggests that consideration be given to new forms of cross-programme and cross-platform clearing systems, with the aid of which interest could be awoken in high-quality content, which would also increase the linear programme quality and the online variety without burdening the revenue of private broadcasters.

The report calls for an analysis of whether the principle of mutual recognition could be applied to digital goods in the same manner as to physical goods.

Unauthorised use: the committee alls on the Commission to afford internet users legal certainty when they are using streamed services and to consider, in particular, ways to prevent the use of payment systems and the funding of such services through advertising on pay platforms offering unauthorised downloading and streaming services. It calls on Member States to promote respect for authors' and neighbouring rights and to combat the provision of unauthorised content .

Where legal alternatives do exist, online copyright infringement remains an issue and therefore the legal online availability of copyrighted cultural material needs to be supplemented with smarter online enforcement of copyright.

Remuneration: Members maintain that it is essential to guarantee authors and performers remuneration that is fair and proportional to all forms of exploitation of their works, especially online exploitation, and therefore calls upon the Member States to ban buyout contracts, which contradict this principle. They call on the Commission urgently to present a study considering disparities in the different remuneration mechanisms for authors and performers which are in use at the national level, in order to draw up a list of best practices. Furthermore, they want the bargaining position of authors and performers vis-à-vis producers to be rebalanced by providing authors and performers with an unwaivable right to remuneration for all forms of exploitation of their works, including ongoing remuneration where they have transferred their exclusive 'making available' right to a producer. Members maintain that the best means of guaranteeing decent remuneration for rights‑holders is by offering a choice, as preferred, among collective bargaining agreements (including agreed standard contracts), extended collective licences and collective management organisations.

Licensing: the report points out that multi-territorial or pan-European licensing mechanisms should remain voluntary and that linguistic and cultural differences between Member States, along with variations in national rules unrelated to copyright law, carry their own specific challenges. Members believe, therefore, that a flexible approach regarding pan-European licensing must be adopted, while protecting rights‑holders and progressing towards the digital single market. They take the view that, if sustainable multi-territorial licensing can be encouraged in the digital single market for audiovisual works, this should facilitate market-driven initiatives.

Interoperability: the committee calls on Member States to ensure that collective rights management is based on effective, functional and interoperable systems. It calls on the Commission to consider ways to encourage network operators to standardise their technical tools and reverse the current trend of removing responsibility from these operators regarding consumer protection, implementation of intellectual property rights and ensuring Internet privacy.

Furthermore, Members stress that consideration should be given to applying a reduced rate of VAT to the digital distribution of cultural goods and services in order to eliminate the discrepancies between online and offline services. They take the view that the application of reduced VAT rates for online cultural content sold by a provider established in the EU to a consumer resident in the EU would boost the attractiveness of digital platforms, as they indicated in their resolutions of 17 November 2011 on the modernisation of VAT legislation in order to boost the digital single market and of 13 October 2011 on the future of VAT .

Protection and promotion of audiovisual works: the report calls on the Commission:

· to find mechanisms for encouraging access to archived audiovisual material held by Europe’s film heritage institutions;

· to promote solutions aimed at supporting the digitisation, preservation and educational availability of these works, including across borders.

Education: Members stress the importance of promoting digital skills and media literacy for all EU citizens, and also that consumers should be properly informed about any issues relating to intellectual property rights that may arise when using file-sharing services in the context of cloud-computing services.

MEDIA 2014-2020: lastly, the committee stresses that it is vital for MEDIA to continue to exist as a specific programme focusing solely on the audiovisual sector.

Documents
2012/07/10
   EP - Vote in committee
2012/05/03
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2012/04/26
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2012/04/13
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2012/03/06
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2012/02/08
   EP - BADIA I CUTCHET Maria (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2011/12/19
   EP - BORYS Piotr (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2011/12/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2011/09/12
   EP - CAVADA Jean-Marie (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in CULT

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
234 2011/2313(INI)
2012/03/08 ITRE 33 amendments...
source: PE-483.685
2012/04/03 JURI 36 amendments...
source: PE-486.139
2012/04/13 CULT 165 amendments...
source: PE-487.679

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/4/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=21922&j=0&l=en
committees/0/shadows/3
name
BISKY Lothar
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE480.505
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-PR-480505_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE487.679
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AM-487679_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.423&secondRef=03
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-478423_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE485.840&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-485840_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2012-07-25T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0262_EN.html title: A7-0262/2012
summary
events/2
date
2012-07-25T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0262_EN.html title: A7-0262/2012
summary
events/4
date
2012-09-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0324_EN.html title: T7-0324/2012
summary
events/4
date
2012-09-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0324_EN.html title: T7-0324/2012
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: CAVADA Jean-Marie date: 2011-09-12T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2011-09-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CAVADA Jean-Marie group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria date: 2012-02-08T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2012-02-08T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: BORYS Piotr date: 2011-12-19T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2011-12-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BORYS Piotr group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs/4/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-262&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2012-0262_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-324
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2012-0324_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2011-12-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra group: ALDE name: LØKKEGAARD Morten group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga group: GUE/NGL name: BISKY Lothar responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2011-09-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE name: CAVADA Jean-Marie body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2012-02-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2011-12-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: BORYS Piotr
  • date: 2012-07-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra group: ALDE name: LØKKEGAARD Morten group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga group: GUE/NGL name: BISKY Lothar responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2011-09-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE name: CAVADA Jean-Marie body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2012-02-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2011-12-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: BORYS Piotr
  • date: 2012-07-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-262&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0262/2012 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2012-09-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=21922&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-324 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0324/2012 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union commissioner: BARNIER Michel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2011-09-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CAVADA Jean-Marie group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
CULT
date
2011-09-12T00:00:00
committee_full
Culture and Education
rapporteur
group: PPE name: CAVADA Jean-Marie
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2012-02-08T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ITRE
date
2012-02-08T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
rapporteur
group: S&D name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2011-12-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BORYS Piotr group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
JURI
date
2011-12-19T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE name: BORYS Piotr
docs
  • date: 2012-03-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE480.505 title: PE480.505 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2012-04-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE487.679 title: PE487.679 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2012-04-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE478.423&secondRef=03 title: PE478.423 committee: ITRE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2012-05-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE485.840&secondRef=02 title: PE485.840 committee: JURI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2012-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=21922&j=0&l=en title: SP(2012)766/2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2011-12-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2012-07-10T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2012-07-25T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-262&language=EN title: A7-0262/2012 summary: The Committee on Culture and Education adopted the own-initiative report by Jean-Marie CAVADA (EPP, FR) on the online distribution of audiovisual works in the European Union. Legal content, accessibility and collective rights management : the committee stresses the need to make legal content more attractive, and to improve the online availability of audiovisual works, including both subtitled works and works in all the official languages of the EU. Digital services, such as video streaming, should be made available to all EU citizens irrespective of the Member State in which they are located. Members call on the Commission to request that European digital companies remove geographical controls (e.g. IP address blocking) across the Union and allow the purchase of digital services from outside the consumer’s Member State of origin. It asks the Commission to draft an analysis of the application of the Cable and Satellite Directive to digital distribution. The committee suggests adopting a comprehensive approach at EU level which should involve greater cooperation between rights‑holders, online distribution platforms and internet service providers, so as to facilitate user-friendly and competitive access to audiovisual content. It stresses the importance of net neutrality in order to guarantee equal access to high‑speed networks, which is crucial to the quality of legitimate online audiovisual services. Members emphasise that the digital divide between Member States or regions of the EU represents a serious barrier to the development of the digital single market. They call, therefore, for the expansion of broadband internet access throughout the EU with a view to stimulating access to online services and new technologies. On collective management, Members call on the Commission to present a legislative initiative for the collective management of copyright, aimed at ensuring better accountability, transparency and governance on the part of collective rights management societies, along with efficient dispute resolution mechanisms, and at clarifying and simplifying licensing systems in the music sector. They stress the need to operate a clear distinction between licensing practices for different types of content, notably between audiovisual/cinematographic and musical works. On the question of convergence of the media , Members call for new solutions to be found, not only in terms of authors ’ rights, but also in terms of entertainment law and urge the European Commission to check to what extent various regulations for linear and non-linear services in Directive 2010/13/EU on audiovisual media services are still up-to-date, taking the latest technological developments into consideration. They suggests that consideration be given to new forms of cross-programme and cross-platform clearing systems, with the aid of which interest could be awoken in high-quality content, which would also increase the linear programme quality and the online variety without burdening the revenue of private broadcasters. The report calls for an analysis of whether the principle of mutual recognition could be applied to digital goods in the same manner as to physical goods. Unauthorised use: the committee alls on the Commission to afford internet users legal certainty when they are using streamed services and to consider, in particular, ways to prevent the use of payment systems and the funding of such services through advertising on pay platforms offering unauthorised downloading and streaming services. It calls on Member States to promote respect for authors' and neighbouring rights and to combat the provision of unauthorised content . Where legal alternatives do exist, online copyright infringement remains an issue and therefore the legal online availability of copyrighted cultural material needs to be supplemented with smarter online enforcement of copyright. Remuneration: Members maintain that it is essential to guarantee authors and performers remuneration that is fair and proportional to all forms of exploitation of their works, especially online exploitation, and therefore calls upon the Member States to ban buyout contracts, which contradict this principle. They call on the Commission urgently to present a study considering disparities in the different remuneration mechanisms for authors and performers which are in use at the national level, in order to draw up a list of best practices. Furthermore, they want the bargaining position of authors and performers vis-à-vis producers to be rebalanced by providing authors and performers with an unwaivable right to remuneration for all forms of exploitation of their works, including ongoing remuneration where they have transferred their exclusive 'making available' right to a producer. Members maintain that the best means of guaranteeing decent remuneration for rights‑holders is by offering a choice, as preferred, among collective bargaining agreements (including agreed standard contracts), extended collective licences and collective management organisations. Licensing: the report points out that multi-territorial or pan-European licensing mechanisms should remain voluntary and that linguistic and cultural differences between Member States, along with variations in national rules unrelated to copyright law, carry their own specific challenges. Members believe, therefore, that a flexible approach regarding pan-European licensing must be adopted, while protecting rights‑holders and progressing towards the digital single market. They take the view that, if sustainable multi-territorial licensing can be encouraged in the digital single market for audiovisual works, this should facilitate market-driven initiatives. Interoperability: the committee calls on Member States to ensure that collective rights management is based on effective, functional and interoperable systems. It calls on the Commission to consider ways to encourage network operators to standardise their technical tools and reverse the current trend of removing responsibility from these operators regarding consumer protection, implementation of intellectual property rights and ensuring Internet privacy. Furthermore, Members stress that consideration should be given to applying a reduced rate of VAT to the digital distribution of cultural goods and services in order to eliminate the discrepancies between online and offline services. They take the view that the application of reduced VAT rates for online cultural content sold by a provider established in the EU to a consumer resident in the EU would boost the attractiveness of digital platforms, as they indicated in their resolutions of 17 November 2011 on the modernisation of VAT legislation in order to boost the digital single market and of 13 October 2011 on the future of VAT . Protection and promotion of audiovisual works: the report calls on the Commission: · to find mechanisms for encouraging access to archived audiovisual material held by Europe’s film heritage institutions; · to promote solutions aimed at supporting the digitisation, preservation and educational availability of these works, including across borders. Education: Members stress the importance of promoting digital skills and media literacy for all EU citizens, and also that consumers should be properly informed about any issues relating to intellectual property rights that may arise when using file-sharing services in the context of cloud-computing services. MEDIA 2014-2020: lastly, the committee stresses that it is vital for MEDIA to continue to exist as a specific programme focusing solely on the audiovisual sector.
  • date: 2012-09-11T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=21922&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2012-09-11T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-324 title: T7-0324/2012 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the online distribution of audiovisual works in the European Union. Legal content, accessibility and collective rights management: Parliament stresses the need to make legal content more attractive, and to improve the online availability of audiovisual works, including both subtitled works and works in all the official languages of the EU. Digital services, such as video streaming, should be made available to all EU citizens irrespective of the Member State in which they are located. Members call on the Commission to request that European digital companies remove geographical controls (e.g. IP address blocking) across the Union and allow the purchase of digital services from outside the consumer’s Member State of origin. It asks the Commission to draft an analysis of the application of the Cable and Satellite Directive to digital distribution. Parliament suggests adopting a comprehensive approach at EU level which should involve greater cooperation between rights‑holders, online distribution platforms and internet service providers, so as to facilitate user-friendly and competitive access to audiovisual content. It stresses the importance of net neutrality in order to guarantee equal access to high‑speed networks, which is crucial to the quality of legitimate online audiovisual services. Members emphasise that the digital divide between Member States or regions of the EU represents a serious barrier to the development of the digital single market. They call, therefore, for the expansion of broadband internet access throughout the EU with a view to stimulating access to online services and new technologies. Members observe that the development of cross-border services is entirely possible, provided that business platforms are prepared to acquire, by contractual means, the rights to exploit one or more territories, since it must be remembered that territorial systems are natural markets in the audiovisual sector. On collective management, Members call on the Commission to present a legislative initiative for the collective management of copyright , aimed at ensuring better accountability, transparency and governance on the part of collective rights management societies, along with efficient dispute resolution mechanisms, and at clarifying and simplifying licensing systems in the music sector. They stress the need to operate a clear distinction between licensing practices for different types of content, notably between audiovisual/cinematographic and musical works. The report requires an analysis of whether the principle of mutual recognition could be applied to digital goods in the same manner as to physical goods. Unauthorised use: Parliament calls on the Commission to afford internet users legal certainty when they are using streamed services and to consider, in particular, ways to prevent the use of payment systems and the funding of such services through advertising on pay platforms offering unauthorised downloading and streaming services. It calls on Member States to promote respect for authors' and neighbouring rights and to combat the provision of unauthorised content. Where legal alternatives do exist, online copyright infringement remains an issue and therefore the legal online availability of copyrighted cultural material needs to be supplemented with smarter online enforcement of copyright. Remuneration: Members maintain that it is essential to guarantee authors and performers remuneration that is fair and proportional to all forms of exploitation of their works, especially online exploitation, and therefore calls upon the Member States to ban buyout contracts, which contradict this principle. They call on the Commission urgently to present a study considering disparities in the different remuneration mechanisms for authors and performers which are in use at the national level, in order to draw up a list of best practices. Furthermore, they want the bargaining position of authors and performers vis-à-vis producers to be rebalanced by providing authors and performers with an unwaivable right to remuneration for all forms of exploitation of their works, including ongoing remuneration where they have transferred their exclusive 'making available' right to a producer. Members maintain that the best means of guaranteeing decent remuneration for rights‑holders is by offering a choice, as preferred, among collective bargaining agreements (including agreed standard contracts), extended collective licences and collective management organisations. Licensing: the resolution points out that multi-territorial or pan-European licensing mechanisms should remain voluntary and that linguistic and cultural differences between Member States, along with variations in national rules unrelated to copyright law, carry their own specific challenges. Members believe, therefore, that a flexible approach regarding pan-European licensing must be adopted, while protecting rights‑holders and progressing towards the digital single market. They take the view that, if sustainable multi-territorial licensing can be encouraged in the digital single market for audiovisual works, this should facilitate market-driven initiatives. Interoperability: Parliament calls on Member States to ensure that collective rights management is based on effective, functional and interoperable systems. It calls on the Commission to consider ways to encourage network operators to standardise their technical tools and reverse the current trend of removing responsibility from these operators regarding consumer protection, implementation of intellectual property rights and ensuring Internet privacy. Furthermore, Members stress that consideration should be given to applying a reduced rate of VAT to the digital distribution of cultural goods and services in order to eliminate the discrepancies between online and offline services. They take the view that the application of reduced VAT rates for online cultural content sold by a provider established in the EU to a consumer resident in the EU would boost the attractiveness of digital platforms. Protection and promotion of audiovisual works: Parliament calls on the Commission: to find mechanisms for encouraging access to archived audiovisual material held by Europe’s film heritage institutions; to promote solutions aimed at supporting the digitisation, preservation and educational availability of these works, including across borders. Education: Members stress the importance of promoting digital skills and media literacy for all EU citizens, and also that consumers should be properly informed about any issues relating to intellectual property rights that may arise when using file-sharing services in the context of cloud-computing services. MEDIA 2014-2020: lastly, Parliament stresses that it is vital for MEDIA to continue to exist as a specific programme focusing solely on the audiovisual sector.
  • date: 2012-09-11T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: BARNIER Michel
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CULT/7/08155
New
  • CULT/7/08155
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.30.01 Audiovisual industry and services
  • 3.30.02 Television, cable, digital, mobile
New
3.30.01
Audiovisual industry and services
3.30.06
Information and communication technologies, digital technologies
3.30.25
International information networks and society, internet
activities/0/committees/1/date
Old
  • 2012-02-08T00:00:00
  • 2011-10-18T00:00:00
New
2012-02-08T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur/1
group
S&D
name
ENCIU Ioan
activities/1/committees/1/date
Old
  • 2012-02-08T00:00:00
  • 2011-10-18T00:00:00
New
2012-02-08T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur/1
group
S&D
name
ENCIU Ioan
committees/1/date
Old
  • 2012-02-08T00:00:00
  • 2011-10-18T00:00:00
New
2012-02-08T00:00:00
committees/1/rapporteur/1
group
S&D
name
ENCIU Ioan
activities
  • date: 2011-12-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra group: ALDE name: LØKKEGAARD Morten group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga group: GUE/NGL name: BISKY Lothar responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2011-09-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE name: CAVADA Jean-Marie body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2012-02-08T00:00:00 2011-10-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria group: S&D name: ENCIU Ioan body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2011-12-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: BORYS Piotr
  • date: 2012-07-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra group: ALDE name: LØKKEGAARD Morten group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga group: GUE/NGL name: BISKY Lothar responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2011-09-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE name: CAVADA Jean-Marie body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2012-02-08T00:00:00 2011-10-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria group: S&D name: ENCIU Ioan body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2011-12-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: BORYS Piotr
  • date: 2012-07-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2012-262&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0262/2012 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2012-09-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=21922&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-324 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0324/2012 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: KAMMEREVERT Petra group: ALDE name: LØKKEGAARD Morten group: Verts/ALE name: TRÜPEL Helga group: GUE/NGL name: BISKY Lothar responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2011-09-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE name: CAVADA Jean-Marie
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2012-02-08T00:00:00 2011-10-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria group: S&D name: ENCIU Ioan
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2011-12-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: BORYS Piotr
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: BARNIER Michel
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CULT/7/08155
reference
2011/2313(INI)
title
Online distribution of audiovisual works in the European Union
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject