BETA

5 Amendments of Roberto GUALTIERI related to 2011/2020(BUD)

Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 82 b (new)
82. Notes the ongoing difficulties with theat Seconded National Experts (SNE) are not counted in the one third of EEAS establishment plan as it seems that national experts inside the EEAS are not counted in the 1/3 part for Member States and there seem to be a overproportion of high ranking manff at AD level; nevertheless, recalls the Council decision establishing the organisation and fuctioning of the EEAS which states that "by the expiry of the contract of an SNE transferred to the EEAS under article 7, the function will be converted into a temporary agement posts; this development seems to be a result of pressure by Member States’ administrations on the EEAS in or in cases where the function performed by the SNE corresponds to a function normally carried out by staff at AD level, providerd to create high ranking posts for national civil servants;hat the necessary post is available under the establishment plan".
2011/10/06
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 82 a (new)
82a.Takes into account the clarifications received from the EEAS in the letter sent to the Committee on Budgets chair on 30 September 2011 concerning the share of EU officials in the establishment plan, in line with the committment taken by HR/VP; therefore, decides to restore the EEAS establishment plan as proposed in Commission Draft Budget, and believes that all reserves related to recruitment and the setting up of an EU delegation in the United Arab Emirates should be lifted;
2011/10/06
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 83
83. NotesIs concerned by the Council’s position to reduce the increase incut the EEAS’ draft budget for 2012 to +2,25%; has also taken a restrictive approach on increases, in line with the position of its Committee on Foreign Affairs;
2011/10/06
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 84
84. Notes that the EEAS is constantly growing since its creation in 2010; has therefore decided to apply an abatement rate of 6% (instead of 14 % proposed by Council); has therefore refused new AD posts for delegationsremarks that the increase in budgetary needs of the EEAS is a result of a reallocation of competences previously carried out by the Council and the Commission, and the development of underestimated needs such as start-up costs, new obligations and tasks currently undertaken by Council and Commission; therefore, taking into account its specific situation, believes that the Commission draft budget for Section X should be reinstated;
2011/10/06
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph
85. Concerning the other lines, decides to increase appropriations partly above Council's position level because there will be the need to move the EEAS to a new building, which will make necessary to procure services from the local market, as well as to introduce a reserve on budget lines 3001, 3002 and 3004 because of large contractual obligations payable in foreign currencies, which are extremely sensitive to exchange rate movements;
2011/10/06
Committee: BUDG