BETA

21 Amendments of Kay SWINBURNE related to 2010/2006(INI)

Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas there is at present insufficient EUinternational regulation of crisis management in the 1 OJ C 40, 7.2.2001, p. 453. banking sector,
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas existing EUinternational supervisory mechanisms for the financial sector have proven ineffective in preventing or sufficiently containing contagion,
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas citizens demand that the EU institutions, working in step with the G20 and other international fora, urgently create an adequate framework which, in the event of crisis, would preserve financial stability, would minimise the cost to taxpayers, would preserve basic banking services and would protect depositors,
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas a strict EUinternationally recognised code of conduct for management, as well as mechanisms to deter inappropriate behaviour, are required,
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. whereas a limited number of banks (“Systemic Banks”) represent an extremely high level of systemic risk due to their size, complexity and interconnectedness across Europeon both regional and global levels, calling for an urgent and targeted special regime,
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital P a (new)
Pa. whereas a fundamental principle of regulation should be that no bank should be allowed to become "too big to fail",
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital P b (new)
Pb. whereas the elimination of "moral hazard" must be a guiding principle in future financial supervision,
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital P c (new)
Pc. whereas the global nature of the financial crisis makes it essential that a new framework should be created on an international level in appropriate fora,
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital P d (new)
Pd. whereas it is the duty of regulators in the Member States to develop early intervention tools and a resolution framework,
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital P e (new)
Pe. whereas the experience of Northern Rock, AIG, and Lehman Brothers shows that systemic risk is not confined to banks, their type, or to their size or interconnectedness, and the main focus should be on identifying and restricting the behaviour that leads to systemic failure,
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Requests the Commission to submit to Parliament by 31 December 2011, on the basis of Article 50 and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,, one or more legislative proposals or proposals on an EU crisis management framework, a resolution unit and an EU financial stability fund, following the detailed recommendations below;
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the financial implications of the requested proposal should be covered by appropriate budgetary allocations (excluding the contributions to the EU financial stability fund which are to be a responsibility of participating banks)within the Member States;
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 2
2. Progressively harmonizcoordinate existing national resolution and insolvency laws and supervisory powers and, within a reasonable calendar, build an effective single EU regime.
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 3
3. Attribute to the relevant supervisor the responsibility for crisis management and the approval of each bank’s contingency plan, as follows: • for Systemic Banks: the national financial supervisor in close cooperation with the European Banking Authority (EBA) in close cooperation with the college of national supervisors and the Cross -Border Stability Groups (as defined in the above-mentioned Memorandum of Understanding of June 2008); • for all other cross border non-systemic banks: the consolidated supervisor within the college, under the coordination of the EBA and in consultation with the Cross- Border Stability Groups; • for local banks: the local supervisor.
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 4
4. Design an EU supervisors’ common set of rulguidelines for crisis management including common methodologies, definitions and terminology.
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2
For banks contributing in the EU Financial Stability Fund, the supervisory powers shall include: • provision of direct loans; • injection of capital.deleted
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – paragraph 5
5. For each of the Systemic Banks, the EBA shall lead the college of supervisors, act under normal circumstances through national supervisors and retain the ultimate decision power and a binding mediating role.
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – paragraph 6
6. An EU Financial Stability Fund and a Resolution Unit shall support interventions led by the EBA (resolution or insolvency) as regards Systemic Banks.deleted
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – paragraph 1
1. An EU Financial Stability Fund shall be created, under the responsibility of the EBAnational supervisory authorities, to finance interventions (rehabilitation or orderly winding-up) aimed at preserving the system’s stability and limit contagion from failing banks. The Commission shall present to the Parliament, by April 2011, a proposal with details of the Fund’s charter, structure, governance, size, operating model as well as a precise calendar for implementation (in accordance with points 2 and 3 below).
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – paragraph 2 – indent 1
pan-Europeancollected by and held within the Member State;
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 4 – paragraph 1
1. A resolution unit shall be established within the EBA to lead the resolution and insolvency procedures for Systemic Banks. This unit shall: • operate within the strict boundaries defined by the legal framework and the EBA’s competencies; • be a pool of legal and financial expertise specially skilled in bank restructurings, turnarounds and liquidation; • cooperate closely with national authorities on implementation, technical assistance and sharing of staff; • propose the disbursements from the Stability Fund.
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON