10 Amendments of Izaskun BILBAO BARANDICA related to 2016/2016(INI)
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
Citation 1 a (new)
— having regard to the recent Judgment of the European Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-132/14 to C- 136/14 on the interpretation of Article 349 TFEU, in which the Court states that Article 349 TFEU authorises a derogation not only from the Treaties but also from secondary legislation;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) recognises, to a certain extent, the specific characteristics of the ORs and allows for a differentiated approach in thefocus in those regions, although it does not fully address the specific problems that those regions have;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that marinPoints out that scarce biological resources around the ORs should be especially protected and hence only fishing vessels registered in OR ports are allowed to fish in the waters up to 100 nautical miles from the baselines of the ORs; takes the view, therefore, that the ORs' small- scale artisanal and coastal fleets should be given preferential access to fishing opportunities for highly migratory species in order to foster the diversification that is a traditional characteristic of those fleets, and that Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council of 11 of December 2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy should be adapted accordingly;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the specific provisions for the ORs in the EMFF, such as the compensation for additional costs – which is higher than was at its highest during the previous programming period but is still not enough – and the maximum public aid intensity, which is higher than for other regions;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Requests the Member States, when implementing the CFP provision of the CFP on n the allocation of fishing opportunities, to consider in particular fishing vesselspay particular attention to traditional and artisanal fishing in the ORs, which contributes to the local economy and haves a low impact on the environment;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Considers that both the databases on stocks and the impact of small-scale vessels in the ORs has tomust be improved;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Advocates reconsidering the fleet segmentation basis under a potential future CFP, in order to make better use of capacity limits and facilitate developmentsecure an objective evaluation of the balance between the fishing opportunities and the ‘fishing capacity’ of the ORs’ small-scale artisanal fleet (which uses highly selective fishing gear), promoting the implementation of technical improvements to vessels with power and/or stability issues that could pose a risk to crew safety in adverse weather conditions, in line with the objective scientific criteria used in shipbuilding, without giving rise to an increase in fishing activity;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Proposes increasting aid intensity for engine replacement in the ORs where scientific evidence indicates that climate conditions and climate change have a decisive negative impact on the ORs’ fleetsnew aid schemes for the gradual renovation and modernisation of the ORs’ artisanal fleets, in particular so as to promote the implementation of technical improvements to small-scale selective artisanal fishing vessels in the ORs with power and/or stability issues that could pose a risk to crew safety in adverse weather conditions, in line with the objective scientific criteria used in shipbuilding, without giving rise to an imbalance between fishing opportunities and ‘fishing capacity’;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Advocates not establishing a dedicated fund for the ORs, as comprehensive resources of the European Structural and Investment Funds are already availableCalls on the Commission to look into the possibility of creating, under the next multiannual financial framework, a specific instrument – along the lines of the POSEI relating to agriculture that is already in place for the ORs – which is designed to compensate for the additional costs of fisheries and aquaculture products in the ORs, and which must include the following EMFF Regulation provisions: Article 8 (State aids), Article 13(5) (Budgetary resources under shared management), Article 70 (Compensation regime), Article 71 (Calculation of the compensation), Article 72 (Compensation Plan), Article 73 (State aids for for implementing compensation plans);
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Notes that modernisation may lead to increased and more diversified fishing activities; stresses that these activities must not undermine the objectives of sustainable fisheries and healthy stocksthe renovation and modernisation of vessels in the ORs’ small-scale artisanal fleets – which use highly selective fishing gear such as hand lines – may improve crew safety in adverse weather conditions, in line with the objective scientific criteria used in shipbuilding, without giving rise to an imbalance between fishing opportunities and ‘fishing capacity’;