BETA

8 Amendments of Maurice PONGA related to 2010/2305(INI)

Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas absorption capacity is the extent to which a Member State is able to spend the financial resources allocated from the Structural and Cohesion Funds in an effective and efficient manner, and whereas this capacity is necessary for making a maximum contribution to economic and soc, social and territorial cohesion with the resources available from the EU funds,
2011/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas absorption capacity is not a parameter but a variable and whereas it differs widely in the different Member States and regions, so that individual solutions are necessary to increase this capacity,
2011/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas aiming at absorbing as much financial support as possible requires continuous efforts by the Member States and management authorities and the involvement of the local and regional level of administration in every stage of the process,
2011/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point 6
over-complicated and over-strict national requirementprocedures, and frequent changes therein;
2011/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Highlights the benefits of synergies between ERDF, ESF and EAFRD, but also with the EDF in the case of certain European regions which neighbour ACP countries; takes the view that flexibility to support ESF- type of actions in ERDF programmes should be increased, and that harmonisation of rules and procedures would lead to simplified delivery systems and encourage participation by potential beneficiaries in EU co-funded programmes; recalls in this context the potential of cross-financing, which is not yet being fully exploited;
2011/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Invites the Member States to establish exchange fora or networks among their implementation structures with a view to discussing experiences and difficulties and exchanging best practices; invites the Member States also to help beneficiaries address more demanding control requirements by providing them with support, in particular by using technical assistance loans to train and support those economic and social actors that are eligible to benefit from these funds;
2011/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Member States to inform citizensand provide support to citizens, representatives of civil society and regional and local authorities fully about financing possibilities, eligibility for co-financing from the Structural and Cohesion Funds, the co- financing rules, the rules on reimbursement, and where to find calls for proposals;
2011/06/09
Committee: REGI
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Reiterates that multi-level governance and the partnership principle are key elements in the effectiveness of operational programmes and in high absorption capacity; recommends to the Members States, in line with the principles of subsidiarity and of their institutional autonomy, that they consistently reinforce the partnership and transparency principle, while implementing the operational programmes, and that they involve the economic and social actors and sub- national levelauthorities from the outset in defining investment priorities, in the decision making process itself and in the implementation and evaluation of programmes;
2011/06/09
Committee: REGI