BETA


2010/2305(INI) Absorption of Structural and Cohesion Funds: lessons learnt for the future cohesion policy of the EU

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead REGI THEURER Michael (icon: ALDE ALDE) AUCONIE Sophie (icon: PPE PPE), BOŞTINARU Victor (icon: S&D S&D), RÜHLE Heide (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), VLASÁK Oldřich (icon: ECR ECR)
Committee Opinion EMPL BAUER Edit (icon: PPE PPE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2011/09/27
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2011/09/27
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the absorption of Structural and Cohesion Funds: lessons learnt for the future cohesion policy of the EU.

Absorption capacity is the extent to which a Member State and its regions are able to spend the financial resources allocated from the Structural and Cohesion Funds in an effective and efficient manner. Parliament recalls that this capacity is necessary for making a maximum contribution to economic, social and territorial cohesion with the resources available from the EU funds.

Main problems identified : pointing out that efforts have been made to ensure an acceleration in absorption capacities and budgetary implementation of cohesion policy during 2010, Parliament points out that absorption problems have been caused by the following main factors : (i) difficulties with completing the compliance assessment procedures concerning the new management and control system, that generally fall at the beginning of the programming period; (ii) global economic recession, which has a direct effect in the form of the budgetary restraint measures applied to public budgets and difficulties in obtaining internal financing; (iii) insufficient resources to co-finance projects; (iv) delays in the establishment and introduction of EU and national rules or related guidance, and incomplete or unclear rules; (v) delays in the translation of the guidance notes and in obtaining clarification from the Commission, and inconsistency of Commission guidance; (vi) over-complicated and over-strict national procedures, and frequent changes therein.

Improving absorption capacity : the resolution presents a certain number of proposals with a view to improving absorption capacity :

encourage and maintain an extensive dialogue with all stakeholders at national, regional and local level in order better to identify the needs of the labour market; improve awareness and accessibility of the ESF and to update project-building capacities in order to contribute to the creation of new, decent jobs and more effective social inclusion; give priority to the integrated approach for local and regional development projects, encouraging the development of bottom-up local initiatives for the ESF and making it possible to combine several sources of financing: operational programmes, national programmes and private resources at the individual project level; the ESF objectives to be brought into line with the real requirements of a labour market that is in need of investment in upgrading vocational training and in measures to protect craft trades; the need for greater synergy and complementarity between all the shared management funds (ERDF, ESF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD and EFF) and the EDF in the case of certain European regions which neighbour ACP countries; review the level of co-financing to reflect better the level of development, EU added value, types of action, beneficiaries, their absorption capacities and development opportunities; an adequate Community budget to be allocated to cohesion policy at a time when national and local contributions are being hampered by national budgetary austerity policies; pay more attention to project preparation and to draw up a project pipeline so that the risk of cost overrun can be minimised and a high absorption rate attained; pay attention to better management of human resources by making further efforts to attract and retain qualified staff to manage EU funds, by promoting high-quality training for them, and by avoiding any replacement of staff unless this is strictly necessary and guided by the sole aim of improving their effectiveness and consequently the absorption capacity; establish an Internet-based platform for beneficiaries, local and regional stakeholders and government institutions to exchange best-practices and information on obstacles, problems and their possible solutions; use the information and communication systems to develop an early warning system on the absorption of the funds.

Important role of the European Social Fund (ESF) : Parliament considers that the European Social Fund (ESF) provides vital support for labour market policies and plays an important role in promoting social inclusion, and whereas its funding needs to be considerably stepped up . It stresses the need to ensure that the European Social Fund (ESF) is used more effectively to address the challenges posed by the current economic financial downturn. It makes the following recommendations:

ensure that the ESF is used in a more efficient way, to respond to the present socio-economic challenges brought about by the financial recession, at all levels and in all Member States; ensure that the future ESF makes a meaningful, targeted contribution to the implementation of the Europe 2020 Strategy in the fields of employment and social inclusion as a visible, transparent, efficient, flexible, simple and user-friendly instrument that is brought to bear to develop human capital, while reflecting the specificities and needs of Member States and regions; the need to concentrate efforts on a limited number of priorities – the most urgent among them being reducing record levels of unemployment in the internal market, with special reference to jobs for young people and women; improve awareness and accessibility of the ESF and to update project-building capacities in order to contribute to the creation of new, decent jobs and more effective social inclusion; on the basis of clear rules, to use the possibility of advance payments to ESF beneficiaries to a greater extent.

Facilitating access of SMEs : Parliament points out that most SMEs, and especially small and micro enterprises, cannot access Structural Funds on their own due to current administrative and financial constraints and that they need support and advice from their representative organisations at regional and national level. It considers that a simplification of the rules and procedures is essential to ensuring their access to Structural Funds. Members call for the Small Business Act , its ‘think small first’ and ‘only once’ principles and the proportionality principle to be applied at all levels of decision-making to define investment priorities and the design of management, audit and control procedures in order to ensure better absorption of the funds.

Lastly, Parliament reiterates that the mechanisms of multi-level governance and the partnership principle are key elements in the effectiveness of operational programmes and in high absorption capacity.

Documents
2011/09/27
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2011/09/26
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2011/07/25
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2011/07/25
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2011/07/12
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Regional Development adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Michael THEURER (ADLE, DE) on the absorption of Structural and Cohesion Funds: lessons learnt for the future cohesion policy of the EU.

Absorption capacity is the extent to which a Member State and its regions are able to spend the financial resources allocated from the Structural and Cohesion Funds in an effective and efficient manner. Members recall that this capacity is necessary for making a maximum contribution to economic, social and territorial cohesion with the resources available from the EU funds.

Pointing out that efforts have been made to ensure an acceleration in absorption capacities and budgetary implementation of cohesion policy during 2010, Members point out that absorption problems have been caused by the following main factors : (i) difficulties with completing the compliance assessment procedures concerning the new management and control system, that generally fall at the beginning of the programming period; (ii) global economic recession, which has a direct effect in the form of the budgetary restraint measures applied to public budgets and difficulties in obtaining internal financing; (iii) insufficient resources to co-finance projects; (iv) delays in the establishment and introduction of EU and national rules or related guidance, and incomplete or unclear rules; (v) delays in the translation of the guidance notes and in obtaining clarification from the Commission, and inconsistency of Commission guidance; (vi) over-complicated and over-strict national procedures, and frequent changes therein.

The report presents a certain number of proposals with a view to improving absorption capacity :

encourage and maintain an extensive dialogue with all stakeholders at national, regional and local level in order better to identify the needs of the labour market; improve awareness and accessibility of the ESF and to update project-building capacities in order to contribute to the creation of new, decent jobs and more effective social inclusion; give priority to the integrated approach for local and regional development projects, encouraging the development of bottom-up local initiatives for the ESF and making it possible to combine several sources of financing: operational programmes, national programmes and private resources at the individual project level; the ESF objectives to be brought into line with the real requirements of a labour market that is in need of investment in upgrading vocational training and in measures to protect craft trades; the need for greater synergy and complementarity between all the shared management funds (ERDF, ESF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD and EFF) and the EDF in the case of certain European regions which neighbour ACP countries review the level of co-financing to reflect better the level of development, EU added value, types of action, beneficiaries, their absorption capacities and development opportunities; an adequate Community budget to be allocated to cohesion policy at a time when national and local contributions are being hampered by national budgetary austerity policies; pay more attention to project preparation and to draw up a project pipeline so that the risk of cost overrun can be minimised and a high absorption rate attained; pay attention to better management of human resources by making further efforts to attract and retain qualified staff to manage EU funds, by promoting high-quality training for them, and by avoiding any replacement of staff unless this is strictly necessary and guided by the sole aim of improving their effectiveness and consequently the absorption capacity; establish an Internet-based platform for beneficiaries, local and regional stakeholders and government institutions to exchange best-practices and information on obstacles, problems and their possible solutions; use the information and communication systems to develop an early warning system on the absorption of the funds.

The report also stresses the need to ensure that the European Social Fund (ESF) is used more effectively to address the challenges posed by the current economic financial downturn. It makes the following recommendations:

ensure that the ESF is used in a more efficient way, to respond to the present socio-economic challenges brought about by the financial recession, at all levels and in all Member States; ensure that the future ESF makes a meaningful, targeted contribution to the implementation of the Europe 2020 Strategy in the fields of employment and social inclusion as a visible, transparent, efficient, flexible, simple and user-friendly instrument that is brought to bear to develop human capital, while reflecting the specificities and needs of Member States and regions; the need to concentrate efforts on a limited number of priorities – the most urgent among them being reducing record levels of unemployment in the internal market, with special reference to jobs for young people and women; improve awareness and accessibility of the ESF and to update project-building capacities in order to contribute to the creation of new, decent jobs and more effective social inclusion; on the basis of clear rules, to use the possibility of advance payments to ESF beneficiaries to a greater extent.

Members reiterate that the mechanisms of multi-level governance and the partnership principle are key elements in the effectiveness of operational programmes and in high absorption capacity.

2011/07/07
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/06/09
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2011/05/06
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2010/12/16
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2010/12/16
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2010/12/16
   EP - BAUER Edit (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2010/06/03
   EP - THEURER Michael (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in REGI

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
164 2010/2305(INI)
2011/05/03 EMPL 66 amendments...
source: PE-464.702
2011/06/09 REGI 98 amendments...
source: PE-467.037

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE464.796
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-PR-464796_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE467.037
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AM-467037_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE462.555&secondRef=03
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-462555_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0287_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0287_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2011-07-25T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0287_EN.html title: A7-0287/2011
events/3
date
2011-07-25T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0287_EN.html title: A7-0287/2011
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110926&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2011-09-27T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0403_EN.html title: T7-0403/2011
summary
events/6
date
2011-09-27T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0403_EN.html title: T7-0403/2011
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
rapporteur
name: THEURER Michael date: 2010-06-03T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2010-06-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: THEURER Michael group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: BAUER Edit date: 2010-12-16T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2010-12-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BAUER Edit group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-287&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0287_EN.html
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-287&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0287_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-403
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0403_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2010-12-16T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2010-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: BAUER Edit body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: AUCONIE Sophie group: S&D name: BOŞTINARU Victor group: Verts/ALE name: RÜHLE Heide group: ECR name: VLASÁK Oldřich responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2010-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: THEURER Michael
  • date: 2011-07-12T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2010-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: BAUER Edit body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: AUCONIE Sophie group: S&D name: BOŞTINARU Victor group: Verts/ALE name: RÜHLE Heide group: ECR name: VLASÁK Oldřich responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2010-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: THEURER Michael type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2011-07-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-287&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0287/2011 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2011-09-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110926&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-09-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20454&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-403 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0403/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: HAHN Johannes
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2010-06-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: THEURER Michael group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
EMPL
date
2010-12-16T00:00:00
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: PPE name: BAUER Edit
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2010-12-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BAUER Edit group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
REGI
date
2010-06-03T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: THEURER Michael
docs
  • date: 2011-05-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE464.796 title: PE464.796 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2011-06-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE467.037 title: PE467.037 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2011-07-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE462.555&secondRef=03 title: PE462.555 committee: EMPL type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-07-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-287&language=EN title: A7-0287/2011 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
events
  • date: 2010-12-16T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2010-12-16T00:00:00 type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2011-07-12T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Regional Development adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Michael THEURER (ADLE, DE) on the absorption of Structural and Cohesion Funds: lessons learnt for the future cohesion policy of the EU. Absorption capacity is the extent to which a Member State and its regions are able to spend the financial resources allocated from the Structural and Cohesion Funds in an effective and efficient manner. Members recall that this capacity is necessary for making a maximum contribution to economic, social and territorial cohesion with the resources available from the EU funds. Pointing out that efforts have been made to ensure an acceleration in absorption capacities and budgetary implementation of cohesion policy during 2010, Members point out that absorption problems have been caused by the following main factors : (i) difficulties with completing the compliance assessment procedures concerning the new management and control system, that generally fall at the beginning of the programming period; (ii) global economic recession, which has a direct effect in the form of the budgetary restraint measures applied to public budgets and difficulties in obtaining internal financing; (iii) insufficient resources to co-finance projects; (iv) delays in the establishment and introduction of EU and national rules or related guidance, and incomplete or unclear rules; (v) delays in the translation of the guidance notes and in obtaining clarification from the Commission, and inconsistency of Commission guidance; (vi) over-complicated and over-strict national procedures, and frequent changes therein. The report presents a certain number of proposals with a view to improving absorption capacity : encourage and maintain an extensive dialogue with all stakeholders at national, regional and local level in order better to identify the needs of the labour market; improve awareness and accessibility of the ESF and to update project-building capacities in order to contribute to the creation of new, decent jobs and more effective social inclusion; give priority to the integrated approach for local and regional development projects, encouraging the development of bottom-up local initiatives for the ESF and making it possible to combine several sources of financing: operational programmes, national programmes and private resources at the individual project level; the ESF objectives to be brought into line with the real requirements of a labour market that is in need of investment in upgrading vocational training and in measures to protect craft trades; the need for greater synergy and complementarity between all the shared management funds (ERDF, ESF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD and EFF) and the EDF in the case of certain European regions which neighbour ACP countries review the level of co-financing to reflect better the level of development, EU added value, types of action, beneficiaries, their absorption capacities and development opportunities; an adequate Community budget to be allocated to cohesion policy at a time when national and local contributions are being hampered by national budgetary austerity policies; pay more attention to project preparation and to draw up a project pipeline so that the risk of cost overrun can be minimised and a high absorption rate attained; pay attention to better management of human resources by making further efforts to attract and retain qualified staff to manage EU funds, by promoting high-quality training for them, and by avoiding any replacement of staff unless this is strictly necessary and guided by the sole aim of improving their effectiveness and consequently the absorption capacity; establish an Internet-based platform for beneficiaries, local and regional stakeholders and government institutions to exchange best-practices and information on obstacles, problems and their possible solutions; use the information and communication systems to develop an early warning system on the absorption of the funds. The report also stresses the need to ensure that the European Social Fund (ESF) is used more effectively to address the challenges posed by the current economic financial downturn. It makes the following recommendations: ensure that the ESF is used in a more efficient way, to respond to the present socio-economic challenges brought about by the financial recession, at all levels and in all Member States; ensure that the future ESF makes a meaningful, targeted contribution to the implementation of the Europe 2020 Strategy in the fields of employment and social inclusion as a visible, transparent, efficient, flexible, simple and user-friendly instrument that is brought to bear to develop human capital, while reflecting the specificities and needs of Member States and regions; the need to concentrate efforts on a limited number of priorities – the most urgent among them being reducing record levels of unemployment in the internal market, with special reference to jobs for young people and women; improve awareness and accessibility of the ESF and to update project-building capacities in order to contribute to the creation of new, decent jobs and more effective social inclusion; on the basis of clear rules, to use the possibility of advance payments to ESF beneficiaries to a greater extent. Members reiterate that the mechanisms of multi-level governance and the partnership principle are key elements in the effectiveness of operational programmes and in high absorption capacity.
  • date: 2011-07-25T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-287&language=EN title: A7-0287/2011
  • date: 2011-09-26T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110926&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-09-27T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20454&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2011-09-27T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-403 title: T7-0403/2011 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the absorption of Structural and Cohesion Funds: lessons learnt for the future cohesion policy of the EU. Absorption capacity is the extent to which a Member State and its regions are able to spend the financial resources allocated from the Structural and Cohesion Funds in an effective and efficient manner. Parliament recalls that this capacity is necessary for making a maximum contribution to economic, social and territorial cohesion with the resources available from the EU funds. Main problems identified : pointing out that efforts have been made to ensure an acceleration in absorption capacities and budgetary implementation of cohesion policy during 2010, Parliament points out that absorption problems have been caused by the following main factors : (i) difficulties with completing the compliance assessment procedures concerning the new management and control system, that generally fall at the beginning of the programming period; (ii) global economic recession, which has a direct effect in the form of the budgetary restraint measures applied to public budgets and difficulties in obtaining internal financing; (iii) insufficient resources to co-finance projects; (iv) delays in the establishment and introduction of EU and national rules or related guidance, and incomplete or unclear rules; (v) delays in the translation of the guidance notes and in obtaining clarification from the Commission, and inconsistency of Commission guidance; (vi) over-complicated and over-strict national procedures, and frequent changes therein. Improving absorption capacity : the resolution presents a certain number of proposals with a view to improving absorption capacity : encourage and maintain an extensive dialogue with all stakeholders at national, regional and local level in order better to identify the needs of the labour market; improve awareness and accessibility of the ESF and to update project-building capacities in order to contribute to the creation of new, decent jobs and more effective social inclusion; give priority to the integrated approach for local and regional development projects, encouraging the development of bottom-up local initiatives for the ESF and making it possible to combine several sources of financing: operational programmes, national programmes and private resources at the individual project level; the ESF objectives to be brought into line with the real requirements of a labour market that is in need of investment in upgrading vocational training and in measures to protect craft trades; the need for greater synergy and complementarity between all the shared management funds (ERDF, ESF, Cohesion Fund, EAFRD and EFF) and the EDF in the case of certain European regions which neighbour ACP countries; review the level of co-financing to reflect better the level of development, EU added value, types of action, beneficiaries, their absorption capacities and development opportunities; an adequate Community budget to be allocated to cohesion policy at a time when national and local contributions are being hampered by national budgetary austerity policies; pay more attention to project preparation and to draw up a project pipeline so that the risk of cost overrun can be minimised and a high absorption rate attained; pay attention to better management of human resources by making further efforts to attract and retain qualified staff to manage EU funds, by promoting high-quality training for them, and by avoiding any replacement of staff unless this is strictly necessary and guided by the sole aim of improving their effectiveness and consequently the absorption capacity; establish an Internet-based platform for beneficiaries, local and regional stakeholders and government institutions to exchange best-practices and information on obstacles, problems and their possible solutions; use the information and communication systems to develop an early warning system on the absorption of the funds. Important role of the European Social Fund (ESF) : Parliament considers that the European Social Fund (ESF) provides vital support for labour market policies and plays an important role in promoting social inclusion, and whereas its funding needs to be considerably stepped up . It stresses the need to ensure that the European Social Fund (ESF) is used more effectively to address the challenges posed by the current economic financial downturn. It makes the following recommendations: ensure that the ESF is used in a more efficient way, to respond to the present socio-economic challenges brought about by the financial recession, at all levels and in all Member States; ensure that the future ESF makes a meaningful, targeted contribution to the implementation of the Europe 2020 Strategy in the fields of employment and social inclusion as a visible, transparent, efficient, flexible, simple and user-friendly instrument that is brought to bear to develop human capital, while reflecting the specificities and needs of Member States and regions; the need to concentrate efforts on a limited number of priorities – the most urgent among them being reducing record levels of unemployment in the internal market, with special reference to jobs for young people and women; improve awareness and accessibility of the ESF and to update project-building capacities in order to contribute to the creation of new, decent jobs and more effective social inclusion; on the basis of clear rules, to use the possibility of advance payments to ESF beneficiaries to a greater extent. Facilitating access of SMEs : Parliament points out that most SMEs, and especially small and micro enterprises, cannot access Structural Funds on their own due to current administrative and financial constraints and that they need support and advice from their representative organisations at regional and national level. It considers that a simplification of the rules and procedures is essential to ensuring their access to Structural Funds. Members call for the Small Business Act , its ‘think small first’ and ‘only once’ principles and the proportionality principle to be applied at all levels of decision-making to define investment priorities and the design of management, audit and control procedures in order to ensure better absorption of the funds. Lastly, Parliament reiterates that the mechanisms of multi-level governance and the partnership principle are key elements in the effectiveness of operational programmes and in high absorption capacity.
  • date: 2011-09-27T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: HAHN Johannes
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
REGI/7/04817
New
  • REGI/7/04817
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.70.01 Structural funds, investment funds in general
  • 4.70.02 Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund
New
4.70.01
Structural funds, investment funds in general, programmes
4.70.02
Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund (CF)
other/0/dg/title
Old
Regional Policy
New
Regional and Urban Policy
procedure/subject/0
Old
4.70.01 Structural funds, structural and investment funds in general
New
4.70.01 Structural funds, investment funds in general
procedure/subject/0
Old
4.70.01 Structural funds in general
New
4.70.01 Structural funds, structural and investment funds in general
procedure/subject/1
Old
4.70.02 Cohesion, Cohesion Fund
New
4.70.02 Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund
activities
  • date: 2010-12-16T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2010-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: BAUER Edit body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: AUCONIE Sophie group: S&D name: BOŞTINARU Victor group: Verts/ALE name: RÜHLE Heide group: ECR name: VLASÁK Oldřich responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2010-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: THEURER Michael
  • date: 2011-07-12T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2010-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: BAUER Edit body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: AUCONIE Sophie group: S&D name: BOŞTINARU Victor group: Verts/ALE name: RÜHLE Heide group: ECR name: VLASÁK Oldřich responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2010-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: THEURER Michael type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2011-07-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-287&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0287/2011 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2011-09-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110926&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-09-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20454&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-403 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0403/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2010-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE name: BAUER Edit
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: AUCONIE Sophie group: S&D name: BOŞTINARU Victor group: Verts/ALE name: RÜHLE Heide group: ECR name: VLASÁK Oldřich responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2010-06-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: ALDE name: THEURER Michael
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional Policy commissioner: HAHN Johannes
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
REGI/7/04817
reference
2010/2305(INI)
title
Absorption of Structural and Cohesion Funds: lessons learnt for the future cohesion policy of the EU
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject