Activities of Julie GIRLING related to 2015/2040(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
Commissioner hearings: lessons to be taken from the 2014 process (A8-0197/2015 - Richard Corbett)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on procedures and practices regarding Commissioner Hearings, lessons to be taken from the 2014 process
Amendments (3)
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that committee coordinators should endeavour to reach a consensus on the evaluation; believes nevertheless that, where they are unable to do so, they should be able to act by a majority representing a large majority of the committee, having regard to the respective strengths of the various groups; stresses that, given the limited time available to reach a position, coordinators should limit their comments to those covering the criteria outlined in 1(a)(1) of the abovementioned Annex; considers further that groups which dissent from the majority view should be able to request an appropriate reference in the evaluation letter; recalls that the Rules of Procedure in any event also allow for a political group to request that the Chair convene a full committee meeting;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. As regards the deadlines applicable to the evaluation statements, believes that the Rules of Procedure should provide for the statement of evaluation to be adopted and made public as soon as possible, and made public within 24 hours after the hearings are declared closedfter the evaluation meeting of the committee coordinators.