BETA


2015/2040(INI) Procedures and practices regarding commissioner hearings, lessons to be taken from the 2014 process

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFCO CORBETT Richard (icon: S&D S&D) PREDA Cristian Dan (icon: PPE PPE), MESSERSCHMIDT Morten (icon: ECR ECR), PAGAZAURTUNDÚA Maite (icon: ALDE ALDE), DURAND Pascal (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion ENVI PATRICIELLO Aldo (icon: PPE PPE) Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY (icon: ALDE ALDE), Julie GIRLING (icon: ECR ECR), Valentinas MAZURONIS (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion TRAN CRAMER Michael (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE) Wim van de CAMP (icon: PPE PPE), Merja KYLLÖNEN (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Rolandas PAKSAS (icon: EFDD EFDD), Pavel TELIČKA (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion JURI CAVADA Jean-Marie (icon: ALDE ALDE) Mary HONEYBALL (icon: S&D S&D), Jiří MAŠTÁLKA (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Tadeusz ZWIEFKA (icon: PPE PPE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2016/02/24
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2015/09/08
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2015/09/08
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 517 votes to 168 with 23 abstentions a resolution on procedures and practices regarding Commissioner hearings, lessons to be taken from the 2014 process.

Hearings of Commissioners-designate, first used in 1994, are now a well-established practice and are indispensable in enabling Parliament to make an informed judgement on the Commission when it holds its vote of confidence allowing the Commission to take office. The hearing process gives Parliament and EU citizens the opportunity to discover and evaluate the candidates’ personalities, qualifications, preparedness and priorities as well as their knowledge of their designated portfolio. The practice increases the democratic legitimacy of the European Union institutions and brings those institutions closer to European citizens.

Whilst having demonstrated its effectiveness, the hearing process can always be improved, particularly by means of more flexible and dynamic exchanges between the Commissioner and members of the committee responsible for the hearing.

Members suggested that it would be useful to set a deadline by which all Member States have to put forward their candidates, so as to leave adequate time for the Commission President elect to allocate the portfolios taking into account the work experience and background of the candidate.

With the aim of attaining Parliament’s gender quality objectives, Members considered that each Member State should henceforth put forward at least two candidates – male and female on a footing of equality – for consideration by the Commission President-elect.

Checks on declarations of the financial interests of Commissioners designate by the Committee on Legal Affairs should be improved by including family interests covering family members living with them in the same household since the current scope was too limited. Parliament felt that confirmation by the Committee on Legal Affairs of the absence of any conflict of interests, based on a substantive analysis of the declarations of financial interests, constituted an essential precondition for the holding of the hearing by the committee responsible. It invited the Commission to revise its rules on this as soon as possible. The Committee on Legal Affairs should issue guidelines in the form of a recommendation or initiative report, with a view to facilitating reform of the procedures relating to Commissioners’ declarations of interests.

Members made the following suggestions regarding the hearings:

when a vice-president of the Commission has responsibilities which are primarily horizontal, the hearing could exceptionally be carried out in a different format such as a meeting of the Conference of Presidents or a meeting of the Conference of Committee Chairs; the written questionnaire sent ahead of each hearing should allow for 7 questions instead of 5, but that there should not be several sub-questions under each question; it would be better to have around 25 questions, but with each questioner allowed immediate follow-up, so as to enhance the effectiveness and inquisitorial nature of the hearings; the following guidelines should apply for the coordinators’ evaluation meeting after the hearings: (i) if the coordinators unanimously approve the candidate – letter of approval; (ii) if the coordinators unanimously reject the candidate – letter of rejection; (iii) if coordinators representing a clear majority approve the candidate – letter stating that a large majority approve (minorities may request that it be mentioned that their group does not share the majority view); if there is no clear majority, or there is a majority (but not a consensus) against the candidate, and if the coordinators consider it necessary: (i) first request additional information through further written questions; (ii) if still dissatisfied – request for a further 1.5-hour hearing, with the approval of the Conference of Presidents; (iii) if there is still no consensus or overwhelming majority among the coordinators – vote in committee; a clear majority in this context should be coordinators who together represent at least two-thirds of the committee membership;

Furthermore, Members considered that:

there should be a specific section of Parliament’s website where the CVs of the Commissioners-designate and responses to written questions are made available, in advance of the public hearings, in all the official languages of the Union; there should be a specific and visible place on Parliament’s website where the evaluations are placed within 24 hours; the rule should be changed to refer to 24 hours after the evaluation, given that some evaluations are completed only following further procedures

Documents
2015/09/08
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2015/09/07
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2015/06/19
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Richard CORBETT (S&D, UK) on procedures and practices regarding Commissioner hearings, lessons to be taken from the 2014 process.

Hearings of Commissioners-designate, first used in 1994, are now a well-established practice which increases the democratic legitimacy of the European Union institutions and brings those institutions closer to European citizens. These hearings are indispensable in enabling Parliament to make an informed judgement on the Commission when it holds its vote of confidence allowing the Commission to take office.

Whilst having demonstrated its effectiveness, the hearing process can always be improved.

Members suggested that it would be useful to set a deadline by which all Member States have to put forward their candidates, so as to leave adequate time for the Commission President elect to allocate the portfolios taking into account the work experience and background of the candidate.

With the aim of attaining Parliament’s gender quality objectives, Members considered that each Member State should henceforth put forward at least two candidates – male and female on a footing of equality – for consideration by the Commission President-elect. Checks on declarations of the financial interests of Commissioners designated by the Committee on Legal Affairs should remain the competence of the Committee on Legal Affairs but should be improved. They should also cover family members living with them in the same household. Members stated that the current scope of Commissioners’ declarations of interests is too limited , therefore, the Commission is invited to revise its rules on this as soon as possible.

Members made the following suggestions regarding the hearings:

when a vice-president of the Commission has responsibilities which are primarily horizontal, the hearing could exceptionally be carried out in a different format such as a meeting of the Conference of Presidents or a meeting of the Conference of Committee Chairs; the written questionnaire sent ahead of each hearing should allow for 7 questions instead of 5, but that there should not be several sub-questions under each question; it would be better to have around 25 questions, but with each questioner allowed immediate follow-up, so as to enhance the effectiveness and inquisitorial nature of the hearings; the following guidelines should apply for the coordinators’ evaluation meeting after the hearings: if the coordinators unanimously approve the candidate – letter of approval; (ii) if the coordinators unanimously reject the candidate – letter of rejection; if coordinators representing a clear majority approve the candidate – letter stating that a large majority approve (minorities may request that it be mentioned that their group does not share the majority view); if there is no clear majority, or there is a majority (but not a consensus) against the candidate, and if the coordinators consider it necessary: (i) first request additional information through further written questions; (ii) if still dissatisfied – request for a further 1.5-hour hearing, with the approval of the Conference of Presidents; (iii) if there is still no consensus or overwhelming majority among the coordinators – vote in committee; a clear majority in this context should be coordinators who together represent at least two-thirds of the committee membership;

Furthermore, Members considered that:

there should be a specific section of Parliament’s website where the CVs of the Commissioners-designate and responses to written questions are made available, in advance of the public hearings, in all the official languages of the Union; there should be a specific and visible place on Parliament’s website where the evaluations are placed within 24 hours; the rule should be changed to refer to 24 hours after the evaluation, given that some evaluations are completed only following further procedures.

Documents
2015/06/17
   EP - Vote in committee
2015/05/11
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/05/11
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/04/17
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/04/14
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/02/24
   EP - CAVADA Jean-Marie (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2015/02/12
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/02/12
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2015/02/09
   EP - PATRICIELLO Aldo (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2015/01/19
   EP - CRAMER Michael (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2014/12/04
   EP - CORBETT Richard (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in AFCO

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0197/2015 - Richard Corbett - § 9 introduction et tirets 1 et 2 #

2015/09/08 Outcome: +: 634, -: 58, 0: 8
DE IT ES PL RO GB FR CZ PT BE AT HU NL SE BG DK SK EL LT HR IE LV FI SI LU EE CY MT
Total
91
67
49
49
31
64
71
21
19
19
18
19
25
18
13
13
13
18
11
11
10
8
10
7
6
6
6
6
icon: PPE PPE
200

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
181

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Finland S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: ECR ECR
64

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Hungary NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

A8-0197/2015 - Richard Corbett - Am 1 #

2015/09/08 Outcome: -: 406, +: 292, 0: 5
NL FR BE DK LT FI EE IE CZ SE LV LU AT HR SI SK CY EL BG ES PT MT PL HU GB IT DE RO
Total
26
71
19
12
11
12
6
10
21
19
7
6
18
11
7
13
5
18
14
50
18
6
48
20
65
69
89
31
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Denmark ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3
icon: ECR ECR
63

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Netherlands NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1
icon: S&D S&D
181

Netherlands S&D

3

Belgium S&D

3
3

Lithuania S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Czechia S&D

Against (2)

Abstain (2)

4

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

4

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
204

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

2

A8-0197/2015 - Richard Corbett - § 9 tiret 3 #

2015/09/08 Outcome: +: 509, -: 180, 0: 15
DE ES RO FR HU IT SE BG BE AT PT CZ HR LT NL FI SI LU EE MT SK PL LV IE DK CY EL GB
Total
89
50
30
71
20
69
20
14
18
18
19
21
11
10
25
12
7
6
6
6
12
49
8
10
13
6
18
65
icon: PPE PPE
205
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
182

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Hungary NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
37

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Italy ECR

2

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0197/2015 - Richard Corbett - § 9 tiret 4 #

2015/09/08 Outcome: +: 565, 0: 94, -: 41
DE IT ES FR RO PL PT HU NL SE BG CZ AT BE FI LT IE EL SK DK GB HR LV SI LU EE CY MT
Total
88
68
50
72
31
47
19
20
25
19
14
21
18
19
12
11
10
16
13
13
63
11
8
7
6
6
6
6
icon: PPE PPE
203
2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
179

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Belgium S&D

Against (1)

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: ECR ECR
63

Italy ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1
2

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
10

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

A8-0197/2015 - Richard Corbett - Résolution #

2015/09/08 Outcome: +: 517, -: 168, 0: 23
DE IT ES RO FR BE HU BG AT PT CZ LT HR SK FI SI PL LV EE MT SE NL LU DK IE CY EL GB
Total
90
69
50
31
71
19
19
14
18
19
21
11
11
13
12
7
49
8
6
6
19
26
6
13
10
6
18
65
icon: PPE PPE
206
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
181

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
64

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3

Finland ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
134 2015/2040(INI)
2015/03/20 TRAN 19 amendments...
source: 552.013
2015/03/31 ENVI 41 amendments...
source: 552.132
2015/04/14 AFCO 49 amendments...
source: 554.817
2015/04/21 JURI 25 amendments...
source: 554.914

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.154
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-PR-549154_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE554.817
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AM-554817_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.387&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-549387_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.460&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-549460_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE551.952&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-551952_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2015-06-19T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0197_EN.html title: A8-0197/2015
summary
events/2
date
2015-06-19T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0197_EN.html title: A8-0197/2015
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150907&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2015-09-07-TOC_EN.html
events/5
date
2015-09-08T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0287_EN.html title: T8-0287/2015
summary
events/5
date
2015-09-08T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0287_EN.html title: T8-0287/2015
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
rapporteur
name: CORBETT Richard date: 2014-12-04T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
date
2014-12-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CORBETT Richard group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
rapporteur
name: PATRICIELLO Aldo date: 2015-02-09T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2015-02-09T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PATRICIELLO Aldo group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
rapporteur
name: CRAMER Michael date: 2015-01-19T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2015-01-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CRAMER Michael group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: CAVADA Jean-Marie date: 2015-02-24T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2015-02-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CAVADA Jean-Marie group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
docs/5/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0197&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0197_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0287
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0287_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2015-02-12T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: PREDA Cristian Dan group: ECR name: MESSERSCHMIDT Morten group: ALDE name: PAGAZAURTUNDÚA RUIZ Maite group: Verts/ALE name: DURAND Pascal responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2014-12-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: CORBETT Richard body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2015-02-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: EPP name: PATRICIELLO Aldo body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2015-02-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: CAVADA Jean-Marie body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2015-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: CRAMER Michael
  • date: 2015-06-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: PREDA Cristian Dan group: ECR name: MESSERSCHMIDT Morten group: ALDE name: PAGAZAURTUNDÚA RUIZ Maite group: Verts/ALE name: DURAND Pascal responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2014-12-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: CORBETT Richard body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2015-02-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: EPP name: PATRICIELLO Aldo body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2015-02-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: CAVADA Jean-Marie body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2015-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: CRAMER Michael
  • date: 2015-06-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0197&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0197/2015 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2015-09-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150907&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-09-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0287 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0287/2015 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Secretariat-General commissioner: TIMMERMANS Frans
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
date
2014-12-04T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CORBETT Richard group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFCO
date
2014-12-04T00:00:00
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
rapporteur
group: S&D name: CORBETT Richard
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2015-02-09T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PATRICIELLO Aldo group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ENVI
date
2015-02-09T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
rapporteur
group: EPP name: PATRICIELLO Aldo
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2015-01-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CRAMER Michael group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
JURI
date
2015-02-24T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: CAVADA Jean-Marie
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2015-02-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CAVADA Jean-Marie group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
TRAN
date
2015-01-19T00:00:00
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: CRAMER Michael
docs
  • date: 2015-02-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.154 title: PE549.154 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2015-04-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE554.817 title: PE554.817 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2015-04-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.387&secondRef=02 title: PE549.387 committee: TRAN type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2015-05-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.460&secondRef=02 title: PE549.460 committee: ENVI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2015-05-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE551.952&secondRef=02 title: PE551.952 committee: JURI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-24T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=25914&j=0&l=en title: SP(2015)748 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2015-02-12T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-06-17T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-06-19T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0197&language=EN title: A8-0197/2015 summary: The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Richard CORBETT (S&D, UK) on procedures and practices regarding Commissioner hearings, lessons to be taken from the 2014 process. Hearings of Commissioners-designate, first used in 1994, are now a well-established practice which increases the democratic legitimacy of the European Union institutions and brings those institutions closer to European citizens. These hearings are indispensable in enabling Parliament to make an informed judgement on the Commission when it holds its vote of confidence allowing the Commission to take office. Whilst having demonstrated its effectiveness, the hearing process can always be improved. Members suggested that it would be useful to set a deadline by which all Member States have to put forward their candidates, so as to leave adequate time for the Commission President elect to allocate the portfolios taking into account the work experience and background of the candidate. With the aim of attaining Parliament’s gender quality objectives, Members considered that each Member State should henceforth put forward at least two candidates – male and female on a footing of equality – for consideration by the Commission President-elect. Checks on declarations of the financial interests of Commissioners designated by the Committee on Legal Affairs should remain the competence of the Committee on Legal Affairs but should be improved. They should also cover family members living with them in the same household. Members stated that the current scope of Commissioners’ declarations of interests is too limited , therefore, the Commission is invited to revise its rules on this as soon as possible. Members made the following suggestions regarding the hearings: when a vice-president of the Commission has responsibilities which are primarily horizontal, the hearing could exceptionally be carried out in a different format such as a meeting of the Conference of Presidents or a meeting of the Conference of Committee Chairs; the written questionnaire sent ahead of each hearing should allow for 7 questions instead of 5, but that there should not be several sub-questions under each question; it would be better to have around 25 questions, but with each questioner allowed immediate follow-up, so as to enhance the effectiveness and inquisitorial nature of the hearings; the following guidelines should apply for the coordinators’ evaluation meeting after the hearings: if the coordinators unanimously approve the candidate – letter of approval; (ii) if the coordinators unanimously reject the candidate – letter of rejection; if coordinators representing a clear majority approve the candidate – letter stating that a large majority approve (minorities may request that it be mentioned that their group does not share the majority view); if there is no clear majority, or there is a majority (but not a consensus) against the candidate, and if the coordinators consider it necessary: (i) first request additional information through further written questions; (ii) if still dissatisfied – request for a further 1.5-hour hearing, with the approval of the Conference of Presidents; (iii) if there is still no consensus or overwhelming majority among the coordinators – vote in committee; a clear majority in this context should be coordinators who together represent at least two-thirds of the committee membership; Furthermore, Members considered that: there should be a specific section of Parliament’s website where the CVs of the Commissioners-designate and responses to written questions are made available, in advance of the public hearings, in all the official languages of the Union; there should be a specific and visible place on Parliament’s website where the evaluations are placed within 24 hours; the rule should be changed to refer to 24 hours after the evaluation, given that some evaluations are completed only following further procedures.
  • date: 2015-09-07T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150907&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-09-08T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25914&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2015-09-08T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0287 title: T8-0287/2015 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 517 votes to 168 with 23 abstentions a resolution on procedures and practices regarding Commissioner hearings, lessons to be taken from the 2014 process. Hearings of Commissioners-designate, first used in 1994, are now a well-established practice and are indispensable in enabling Parliament to make an informed judgement on the Commission when it holds its vote of confidence allowing the Commission to take office. The hearing process gives Parliament and EU citizens the opportunity to discover and evaluate the candidates’ personalities, qualifications, preparedness and priorities as well as their knowledge of their designated portfolio. The practice increases the democratic legitimacy of the European Union institutions and brings those institutions closer to European citizens. Whilst having demonstrated its effectiveness, the hearing process can always be improved, particularly by means of more flexible and dynamic exchanges between the Commissioner and members of the committee responsible for the hearing. Members suggested that it would be useful to set a deadline by which all Member States have to put forward their candidates, so as to leave adequate time for the Commission President elect to allocate the portfolios taking into account the work experience and background of the candidate. With the aim of attaining Parliament’s gender quality objectives, Members considered that each Member State should henceforth put forward at least two candidates – male and female on a footing of equality – for consideration by the Commission President-elect. Checks on declarations of the financial interests of Commissioners designate by the Committee on Legal Affairs should be improved by including family interests covering family members living with them in the same household since the current scope was too limited. Parliament felt that confirmation by the Committee on Legal Affairs of the absence of any conflict of interests, based on a substantive analysis of the declarations of financial interests, constituted an essential precondition for the holding of the hearing by the committee responsible. It invited the Commission to revise its rules on this as soon as possible. The Committee on Legal Affairs should issue guidelines in the form of a recommendation or initiative report, with a view to facilitating reform of the procedures relating to Commissioners’ declarations of interests. Members made the following suggestions regarding the hearings: when a vice-president of the Commission has responsibilities which are primarily horizontal, the hearing could exceptionally be carried out in a different format such as a meeting of the Conference of Presidents or a meeting of the Conference of Committee Chairs; the written questionnaire sent ahead of each hearing should allow for 7 questions instead of 5, but that there should not be several sub-questions under each question; it would be better to have around 25 questions, but with each questioner allowed immediate follow-up, so as to enhance the effectiveness and inquisitorial nature of the hearings; the following guidelines should apply for the coordinators’ evaluation meeting after the hearings: (i) if the coordinators unanimously approve the candidate – letter of approval; (ii) if the coordinators unanimously reject the candidate – letter of rejection; (iii) if coordinators representing a clear majority approve the candidate – letter stating that a large majority approve (minorities may request that it be mentioned that their group does not share the majority view); if there is no clear majority, or there is a majority (but not a consensus) against the candidate, and if the coordinators consider it necessary: (i) first request additional information through further written questions; (ii) if still dissatisfied – request for a further 1.5-hour hearing, with the approval of the Conference of Presidents; (iii) if there is still no consensus or overwhelming majority among the coordinators – vote in committee; a clear majority in this context should be coordinators who together represent at least two-thirds of the committee membership; Furthermore, Members considered that: there should be a specific section of Parliament’s website where the CVs of the Commissioners-designate and responses to written questions are made available, in advance of the public hearings, in all the official languages of the Union; there should be a specific and visible place on Parliament’s website where the evaluations are placed within 24 hours; the rule should be changed to refer to 24 hours after the evaluation, given that some evaluations are completed only following further procedures
  • date: 2015-09-08T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/index_en.htm title: Secretariat-General commissioner: TIMMERMANS Frans
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFCO/8/02754
New
  • AFCO/8/02754
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.40.01.06 Committees, interparliamentary delegations
  • 8.40.03 European Commission
New
8.40.01.06
Committees, interparliamentary delegations
8.40.03
European Commission
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150907&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0287 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0287/2015
activities/4/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/4
date
2015-09-08T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/2/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Richard CORBETT (S&D, UK) on procedures and practices regarding Commissioner hearings, lessons to be taken from the 2014 process.

    Hearings of Commissioners-designate, first used in 1994, are now a well-established practice which increases the democratic legitimacy of the European Union institutions and brings those institutions closer to European citizens. These hearings are indispensable in enabling Parliament to make an informed judgement on the Commission when it holds its vote of confidence allowing the Commission to take office.

    Whilst having demonstrated its effectiveness, the hearing process can always be improved.

    Members suggested that it would be useful to set a deadline by which all Member States have to put forward their candidates, so as to leave adequate time for the Commission President elect to allocate the portfolios taking into account the work experience and background of the candidate.

    With the aim of attaining Parliament’s gender quality objectives, Members considered that each Member State should henceforth put forward at least two candidates – male and female on a footing of equality – for consideration by the Commission President-elect. Checks on declarations of the financial interests of Commissioners designated by the Committee on Legal Affairs should remain the competence of the Committee on Legal Affairs but should be improved. They should also cover family members living with them in the same household. Members stated that the current scope of Commissioners’ declarations of interests is too limited, therefore, the Commission is invited to revise its rules on this as soon as possible.

    Members made the following suggestions regarding the hearings:

    • when a vice-president of the Commission has responsibilities which are primarily horizontal, the hearing could exceptionally be carried out in a different format such as a meeting of the Conference of Presidents or a meeting of the Conference of Committee Chairs;
    • the written questionnaire sent ahead of each hearing should allow for 7 questions instead of 5, but that there should not be several sub-questions under each question;
    • it would be better to have around 25 questions, but with each questioner allowed immediate follow-up, so as to enhance the effectiveness and inquisitorial nature of the hearings;
    • the following guidelines should apply for the coordinators’ evaluation meeting after the hearings:
    • if the coordinators unanimously approve the candidate – letter of approval; (ii) if the coordinators unanimously reject the candidate – letter of rejection;
    • if coordinators representing a clear majority approve the candidate – letter stating that a large majority approve (minorities may request that it be mentioned that their group does not share the majority view);
    • if there is no clear majority, or there is a majority (but not a consensus) against the candidate, and if the coordinators consider it necessary: (i) first request additional information through further written questions; (ii) if still dissatisfied – request for a further 1.5-hour hearing, with the approval of the Conference of Presidents; (iii) if there is still no consensus or overwhelming majority among the coordinators – vote in committee;
    • a clear majority in this context should be coordinators who together represent at least two-thirds of the committee membership;

    Furthermore, Members considered that:

    • there should be a specific section of Parliament’s website where the CVs of the Commissioners-designate and responses to written questions are made available, in advance of the public hearings, in all the official languages of the Union;
    • there should be a specific and visible place on Parliament’s website where the evaluations are placed within 24 hours;
    • the rule should be changed to refer to 24 hours after the evaluation, given that some evaluations are completed only following further procedures.
activities/3/date
Old
2015-07-06T00:00:00
New
2015-09-07T00:00:00
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/4
date
2015-07-07T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/3
date
2015-07-06T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/4/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0197&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0197/2015
activities/1
date
2015-06-17T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/2
date
2015-06-19T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
PAGAZAURTUNDÚA RUIZ Maite
committees/0/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
PAGAZAURTUNDÚA RUIZ Maite
activities/1
date
2015-07-07T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
MESSERSCHMIDT Morten
activities/0/committees/4/date
2015-02-24T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/4/rapporteur
  • group: ALDE name: CAVADA Jean-Marie
committees/0/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
MESSERSCHMIDT Morten
committees/4/date
2015-02-24T00:00:00
committees/4/rapporteur
  • group: ALDE name: CAVADA Jean-Marie
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
TIMMERMANS Frans
activities/0/committees/5/date
2015-01-19T00:00:00
activities/0/committees/5/rapporteur
  • group: Verts/ALE name: CRAMER Michael
committees/5/date
2015-01-19T00:00:00
committees/5/rapporteur
  • group: Verts/ALE name: CRAMER Michael
activities
  • date: 2015-02-12T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: PREDA Cristian Dan group: Verts/ALE name: DURAND Pascal responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2014-12-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: CORBETT Richard body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2015-02-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: EPP name: PATRICIELLO Aldo body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: PREDA Cristian Dan group: Verts/ALE name: DURAND Pascal responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2014-12-04T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: CORBETT Richard
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2015-02-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: EPP name: PATRICIELLO Aldo
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
    procedure
    dossier_of_the_committee
    AFCO/8/02754
    reference
    2015/2040(INI)
    title
    Procedures and practices regarding commissioner hearings, lessons to be taken from the 2014 process
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    stage_reached
    Awaiting committee decision
    subtype
    Initiative
    type
    INI - Own-initiative procedure
    subject