3 Amendments of Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL related to 2014/2151(INI)
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the key objective of the action plan should be to ensure that future measures taken to enforce Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) are not based solely on data provided by the industry, in particular in the cultural and creative sectors, but on precise, unbiased data documenting IPR infringements; emphasises that the duty of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) to generate reliable data which allow an analysis of the real impact of infringements on the industry should be part of the ten- point action plan;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses the importance of recognising Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) as one of the principal means through which companies, creators and inventors generate returns on their investment in knowledge, and hence the importance of ensuring that they receive fair remuneration in the online environment, in keeping with the success of their creations and the wealth generated by those creations all along the value chain, from author to final consumer;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that in order to stimulate innovation and competitiveness in knowledge-based sectors in the Union, IPR enforcement should not preventin a manner compatible with intellectual property rights, it is necessary to stimulate open research and knowledge sharing, which are also identified as key elements in the ‘Global Europe’ and ‘Europe 2020’ strategies;