BETA

5 Amendments of Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS related to 2016/2306(INI)

Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11 a. Believes that in big Member States fiscal federalism would allow low-growing regions to set their own economic growth strategies, attract more talent and be less dependent on transfers from the central government.
2016/12/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 283 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Considers that well-functioning, flexible labour markets have proven to be quicker to recover from the economic downturn; Calls big Member States to consider decentralized collective agreements as way to increase their competitiveness.
2016/12/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 301 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Is concerned about the effects of demographic developments on public finances, conditioned by, inter alia, low birth rates, ageing societies and the influx of refugees; points in particular to the impact of ageing populations on pension and healthcare systems in the EU; notes that, owing to different demographic structures, the effects of these developments will vary across Member States, but warns that the already foreseeable funding costs will have a significant impact on public deficits; highlights the fact that current consolidation paths will not be sufficient to ensure compliance with EU fiscal rules if pension systems are not reformed or current reforms are reversed or not implemented; calls the Commission to propose measures that would create a good framework for the return of birth rates to sustainability.
2016/12/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 374 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Notes that six Member States continue to be under the Excessive Deficit Procedure; underlines that this become very problematic in case interest rates go up before it is expected.
2016/12/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 486 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Believes that better implementation of country-specific recommendations requires clearly articulated priorities at European level and genuine public debate at national level, leading to greater ownership; adds that the possibility of reducing the number of recommendations but making it of binding compliance would enhance the efficiency of the European Semester.
2016/12/15
Committee: ECON