BETA


2016/2306(INI) European semester for economic policy coordination: annual growth survey 2017

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON HÖKMARK Gunnar (icon: PPE PPE) SILVA PEREIRA Pedro (icon: S&D S&D), ZĪLE Roberts (icon: ECR ECR), WIERINCK Lieve (icon: ALDE ALDE), VIEGAS Miguel (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), EICKHOUT Bas (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion BUDG DENANOT Jean-Paul (icon: S&D S&D) Nedzhmi ALI (icon: ALDE ALDE), Ivana MALETIĆ (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion ENVI MELO Nuno (icon: PPE PPE) Mireille D'ORNANO (icon: ENF ENF), Jasenko SELIMOVIC (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion REGI HETMAN Krzysztof (icon: PPE PPE) Steeve BRIOIS (icon: ENF ENF), Matthijs van MILTENBURG (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2017/08/31
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2017/02/15
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2017/02/15
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 418 votes to 202 with 73 abstentions, a resolution on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2017.

Whilst welcoming the Commission’s Annual Growth Survey 2017 , Members called for a better implementation of the macroeconomic policy mixing private and public investment, socially balanced structural reforms and responsible public finances . They deplored the very low implementation rate of country-specific recommendations, which declined from 11 % in 2012 to only 4 % in 2015 and stressed that Member States would need to step up their efforts to reform.

Observing that the current excessive reliance on the monetary policy of the European Central Bank, Parliament noted that monetary policy alone is insufficient to stimulate growth when investments and sustainable structural reforms are lacking . It considered that stronger domestic demand would be better for the euro area's sustainable growth.

Parliament also noted that the referendum in the United Kingdom and the recent presidential election in the United States of America have created uncertainties for the European economy and the financial markets. It expressed concern about the backlash against globalization and the rise of protectionism.

Investment : more efforts should be made to boost SME access to finance , and the Commission should to step up its efforts to improve the financing environment:

The resolution stressed the importance of:

facilitating investment in areas such as education, innovation and research; improving significantly the geographical and sectoral coverage of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) and maximising the use of European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) in order to promote upward convergence; addressing remaining challenges, such as the stock of nonperforming loans (NPLs) accumulated during the financial crisis; accelerating work on the Capital Markets Union with a view to providing alternative financing to SMEs, complementing that of the banking sector, and bring about more diversified sources of financing for the economy in general; increasing financing of investments and implement projects that support and attract market-based investment high-growth companies; encouraging a thorough, step-by-step completion of the Banking Union and the development of the Capital Markets Union with the aim of increasing resilience in the banking sector, encouraging public and private investment is crucial to allow for the transition towards a low-carbon and circular economy; taking measures to reduce administrative burden, simplify regulations and improving the financial environment. stepping up efforts to improve the business environment for investments, inter alia by fully implementing and enforcing EU Single Market legislation.

Structural reforms : Parliament recommended the implementation of sustainable structural reforms in product and service markets, as well as in inclusive labour, health, housing and pension markets, in order efficiently to support the recovery. It considered that well-functioning and productive labour markets, combined with an adequate level of social protection and dialogue, have proven to be quicker to recover from the economic downturn.

Parliament also stressed that the EU and its Member States cannot compete on general or labour costs alone, but need to invest more in research, innovation and development, education and skills, and resource efficiency , at both national and European level.

The resolution stressed the importance of:

taking into account the impact of ageing populations on pension and healthcare systems in the EU;

achieving a high employment rate in order ensuring the sustainability of pension systems; in this context, migrants' skills should be used in better ways in order to adapt to labour market needs; focusing efforts on cost-effective spending on high-quality healthcare , and on universal access thereto; continued reforms to facilitate the entry of young people into the labour market, emphasising, in this regard, the importance of the Youth Guarantee; reforms in taxation with a view to tackling the high tax burden on labour in Europe, and further transparency among the Member States in the field of corporate taxation.

Fiscal responsibility and structure of public finances : Parliament noted that only a fiscal policy that respects and follows Union law will lead to credibility and trust between Member States, and serve as a cornerstone for the completion of EMU and the trust of the financial markets.

It invited the Commission and the Council to be as specific as possible when addressing fiscal recommendations under the preventive and corrective arm of the Stability and Growth Pact in order to increase transparency and enforceability of the recommendations.

Furthermore, Members considered that macroeconomic imbalances inside Member States should be addressed in line with the Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure (MIP) through efforts involving all Member States, building on relevant reforms and investments.

Fiscal stance for the euro area : Members considered the Commission’s communication on a positive fiscal stance an important development, and welcomed the intention to contribute to the better coordinating economic policies in the euro area and to highlight the opportunities for fiscal stimulus in Member States having room for this.

Coordination of national policies and democratic accountability : Members highlighted the importance of national parliaments and genuine public debate at national, regional and local levels, leading to greater ownership of country-specific recommendations.

They urged the Commission to launch negotiations on an interinstitutional agreement on economic governance.

Documents
2017/02/15
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2017/02/14
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Details

The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Gunnar HÖKMARK (PPE, SE) on the European Semester for economic policy coordination: Annual Growth Survey 2017.

The Committee on Budgets, exercising its prerogative as an associated committee by virtue of Rule 54 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure , also gave an opinion on this report.

Whilst welcoming the Commission’s Annual Growth Survey 2017 , Members called for a better implementation of the macroeconomic policy mixing private and public investment, socially balanced structural reforms and responsible public finances . They deplored, therefore, the very low implementation rate of country-specific recommendations, which declined from 11 % in 2012 to only 4 % in 2015 and stressed that Member States will need to step up their efforts to reform.

Observing that the current excessive reliance on the monetary policy of the European Central Bank, the report noted that monetary policy alone is insufficient to stimulate growth when investments and sustainable structural reforms are lacking . It considered that stronger domestic demand would be better for the euro area's sustainable growth.

Investment : Members believed more efforts should be made to boost SME access to finance . They called on the Commission, therefore, to step up its efforts to improve the financing environment:

The report stressed the importance of:

facilitating investment in areas such as education, innovation and research; encouraging EFSI should also attract finance for projects with a cross-border dimension, and maximising the use of European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF); increasing financing of investments and implement projects that support and attract market-based investment high-growth companies; encouraging a thorough, step-by-step completion of the Banking Union and the development of the Capital Markets Union with the aim of increasing resilience in the banking sector, encouraging public and private investment is crucial to allow for the transition towards a low-carbon and circular economy; taking measures to reduce administrative burden, simplify regulations and improving the financial environment.

Structural reforms : Members recommended the implementation of sustainable structural reforms in product and service markets, as well as in inclusive labour, health, housing and pension markets, in order efficiently to support the recovery. They stressed that the EU and its Member States cannot compete on general or labour costs alone, but need to invest more in research, innovation and development, education and skills, and resource efficiency , at both national and European level.

The report stressed the importance of:

achieving a high employment rate in order ensuring the sustainability of pension systems; in this context, migrants' skills should be used in better ways in order to adapt to labour market needs; focusing efforts on cost-effective spending on high-quality healthcare , and on universal access thereto; continued reforms to facilitate the entry of young people into the labour market, emphasising, in this regard, the importance of the Youth Guarantee; better coordination of administrative practices in the field of taxation and further transparency among the Member States in the field of corporate taxation.

Fiscal responsibility and structure of public finances : the report noted that only a fiscal policy that respects and follows Union law will lead to credibility and trust between Member States, and serve as a cornerstone for the completion of EMU and the trust of the financial markets;

It invited the Commission and the Council to be as specific as possible when addressing fiscal recommendations under the preventive and corrective arm of the Stability and Growth Pact in order to increase transparency and enforceability of the recommendations.

Furthermore, Members considered that macroeconomic imbalances inside Member States should be addressed in line with the Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure (MIP) through efforts involving all Member States, building on relevant reforms and investments.

Fiscal stance for the euro area : Members considered the Commission’s communication on a positive fiscal stance an important development, and welcomed the intention to contribute to the better coordinating economic policies in the euro area and to highlight the opportunities for fiscal stimulus in Member States having room for this. They took the view that improving the structure of public budgets is one of the key levers for ensuring compliance with EU fiscal rules, and allowing for the financing of indispensable expenditure, for the building of buffers for unforeseen needs and growth-enhancing investments.

Coordination of national policies and democratic accountability : Members highlighted the importance of national parliaments and genuine public debate at national, regional and local levels, leading to greater ownership of country-specific recommendations.

They urged the Commission to launch negotiations on an interinstitutional agreement on economic governance.

Documents
2017/02/14
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2017/02/13
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2017/01/27
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2017/01/27
   CSL - Council Meeting
2017/01/25
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2017/01/25
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2017/01/25
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/12/15
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/12/15
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/12/13
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2016/12/13
   CSL - Council Meeting
2016/12/06
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2016/12/06
   CSL - Council Meeting
2016/11/30
   EP - DENANOT Jean-Paul (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2016/11/24
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2016/11/24
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2016/11/22
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2016/11/09
   EP - HETMAN Krzysztof (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2016/09/28
   EP - MELO Nuno (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2016/07/12
   EP - HÖKMARK Gunnar (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ECON

Documents

Votes

A8-0039/2017 - Gunnar Hökmark - Am 6

2017/02/15 Outcome: -: 537, +: 146, 0: 12
EL IE CY LU EE LT DK LV MT HU SI PT HR FR SE FI IT AT SK CZ BG BE NL ES RO GB PL DE
Total
20
10
6
6
5
10
11
8
6
17
8
21
11
72
19
13
63
18
12
21
15
20
24
51
31
55
51
90
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
26

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
40

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

Against (1)

6

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

6
icon: NI NI
17

France NI

Against (1)

3

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2
3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Finland S&D

2
3

Czechia S&D

4

Belgium S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

Against (2)

2
icon: PPE PPE
205

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0039/2017 - Gunnar Hökmark - Am 7

2017/02/15 Outcome: -: 563, +: 102, 0: 20
EL IE CY EE DK LU MT SI LT LV FI SK HU HR PT CZ SE BG IT FR AT NL BE RO ES GB PL DE
Total
19
10
6
5
11
6
6
7
10
8
12
12
17
11
21
20
18
15
64
72
18
24
20
31
47
55
50
89
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ENF ENF
40

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
26

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

3

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

6

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2
3

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

4

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands S&D

3

Belgium S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
203

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

2

A8-0039/2017 - Gunnar Hökmark - Am 1

2017/02/15 Outcome: -: 498, +: 190, 0: 9
EL IE CY MT LU ES FI AT HU EE FR LT SI LV SE DK NL HR SK CZ PT BG BE IT GB RO DE PL
Total
19
10
6
6
6
51
13
18
17
5
72
10
8
8
19
11
24
11
12
21
21
15
20
64
55
31
92
51
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
40

Austria ENF

Abstain (1)

4

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1
2
icon: EFDD EFDD
26

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Germany EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
16

France NI

Against (1)

3

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
178

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2
3

Czechia S&D

4

Belgium S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
206

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0039/2017 - Gunnar Hökmark - Am 2

2017/02/15 Outcome: -: 494, +: 192, 0: 11
CY IE GB DK EL FI PL EE MT LT LV LU NL SK BE SI HR CZ SE AT HU BG IT PT FR RO ES DE
Total
6
10
55
10
20
13
51
5
6
10
8
6
25
12
20
8
11
21
19
18
17
15
64
21
72
31
50
92
icon: ECR ECR
68

Cyprus ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3
icon: ENF ENF
40

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1
2

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Austria ENF

Abstain (1)

4

Romania ENF

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
26

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
17

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Poland NI

1

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
177

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Belgium S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

4

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4
icon: PPE PPE
205

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

A8-0039/2017 - Gunnar Hökmark - Am 3

2017/02/15 Outcome: -: 515, +: 171, 0: 9
EL IE CY DK FR LU FI LV EE LT SI MT SE HU AT HR SK CZ PT BG IT BE NL ES RO GB PL DE
Total
20
10
6
11
71
6
13
8
5
10
8
6
19
17
18
11
12
21
21
15
64
20
25
48
31
55
51
92
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: ENF ENF
40

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
2

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
26

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

France NI

Against (1)

3

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
68

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
177

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2
3

Czechia S&D

4

Belgium S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
204

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2