11 Amendments of Pino ARLACCHI related to 2011/2109(INI)
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas the ICC is not only an instrument to fight impunity, but also the major alternative conceived so far to the practice of extrajudicial executions and death penalty in the international arena,
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas the ICC is a capital step on the road of the civilization of international relations,
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D c (new)
Recital D c (new)
Dc. whereas the basic inspiration of ICC is to be found in the advancement of global peace and justice, and as such it is deeply coherent with the kind of international order envisioned by the founding fathers of the European Union,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D d (new)
Recital D d (new)
Dd. whereas a stronger ICC is a step toward the main goal of the Schuman declaration: building a lasting peace on the European continent and, more generally, "make war not only unthinkable but materially impossible",
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses that a relevant aspect of the establishment of the ICC is the substitution of many forms of primitive justice like vendetta and violent reprisal with the rule of law and third part justice;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Stresses that the extension of the ICC mandate to the crime of aggression is a powerful contribution to the prevention of international war because it makes the starting of a war a criminal act for which individuals can be tried;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Reiterates the validity of the definition of the crime of aggression as adopted in the Kampala Conference as "the planning, preparation, initiation or execution, by a person in a position effectively to exercise control over or to direct the political or military action of a State, of an act of aggression which, by its character, gravity and scale, constitutes a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations";
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Underlines that jurisdiction over the crime of aggression was present in the Statute of the Court as its core competence from the beginning, but has not become operational immediately because of dissension among the 120 signatory countries of the Treaty of Rome;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 d (new)
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6d. Regrets that the Court, according to the results of the Kampala Conference, would not be able to exercise its jurisdiction over the crime of aggression until after January 2017, when a decision is to be made by States Parties to activate this jurisdiction;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Expresses its concern about the fact that so far the ICC has only investigated cases located in Africa; underlines that this ICC conduct created legitimate criticism and concern, and invites the ICC Prosecutor to balance the geographical scope of the Court;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 b (new)
Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Welcomes recent statements by the ICC Prosecutor that his office is examining, in view of possible future actions, a number of situations on various continents, including cases in Afghanistan, Colombia, Honduras, Republic of Korea and Palestine;