Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFET | KREISSL-DÖRFLER Wolfgang ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | CYMAŃSKI Tadeusz ( ECR) | |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | JOLY Eva ( Verts/ALE) | Maurice PONGA ( PPE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 532 votes to 14, with 19 abstentions, a resolution on EU support for the International Criminal Court (ICC).
Parliament recalls that the ICC is the first permanent international judicial body capable of trying individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, thus making a decisive contribution to upholding human rights and to international law by combating impunity. The Court plays a crucial deterrent role in sending a clear signal that impunity for these crimes will not be tolerated , thus contributing to security, justice and the rule of law as well as to the preservation of peace and the strengthening of international security.
However, it stresses that the fight against impunity can only succeed when all States Parties cooperate fully with the ICC, and when non-parties also provide assistance to the judicial institution.
Accordingly, the resolution makes certain observations and recommendations on strengthening cooperation which may be summarised as follows:
1)The need to enhance support for the Court through political and diplomatic action : Parliament reiterates its full support for the ICC, the Rome Statute and the international criminal justice system, the Prosecutor's proprio motu powers and the progress in initiating new investigations. It urges Parties and non-parties to the Rome Statute to refrain from exercising political pressure on the Court in order to preserve and guarantee its impartiality and to allow for justice to be dispensed based on law, rather than on political considerations.
Parliament underlines the importance of the principle of universality, and calls on the EEAS, the EU Member States and the Commission to continue their vigorous efforts to promote universal ratification of the Rome Statute and the Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the International Criminal Court (APIC) and national implementing legislation.
Welcoming the revised EU Action Plan agreed on 12 July 2011 which outlines effective, concrete measures to be taken by the EU to deepen its future support for the Court, Parliament stresses that full and prompt cooperation between States Parties, including EU Member States, and the Court remains essential to the effectiveness and success of the international criminal justice system. It calls on the EU and its Member States to comply with all requests by the Court to provide assistance and cooperation in a timely manner to ensure, inter alia , the execution of pending arrest warrants and the provision of information, including requests aimed at helping to identify, freeze and seize the financial assets of suspects.
Member States are also called upon to:
enact national legislation on cooperation and to conclude framework agreements with the ICC for the enforcement of the Court's sentences and on matters of investigation; transfer competences to the EU in the area of identification and confiscation of assets of persons indicted by the ICC, notwithstanding the fact that judicial proceedings are initiated by the ICC; cooperate in exchanging relevant information through the existing Asset Recovery Offices as well as through the Camden Asset Recovery Inter-Agency Network (CARIN); ratify the amendments agreed at the Kampala Review Conference of amendments to the Rome Statute relating to the crime of aggression.
Fight against impunity for the worst crimes known to humanity : Parliament welcomes the contribution of some EU Member States to the fight against impunity for the worst crimes known to humanity through the application of universal jurisdiction . It underlines the fundamental role of international criminal jurisdictions in addressing the relevant violations of international law concerning the illegal recruitment of child soldiers. It firmly opposes children under the age of 18 years being conscripted into the armed forces or used in any way in military action.
Parliament calls for the establishment of effective policies and enhancing mechanisms to ensure that victims' participation at the ICC has substantive impact , including more accessible psychological, medical and legal counselling and easy access to witness protection programmes. It highlights the importance of p romoting awareness of sexual violence in conflict zones by means of law programmes, the documentation of gender-based crimes in armed conflicts, and the training of lawyers, judges and activists on the Rome Statute and on international jurisprudence in relation to gender-based crimes against women and children.
Full cooperation with the ICC : Parliament notes the Cooperation and Assistance Agreement between the EU and the ICC and call on EU Member States to apply the principle of universal jurisdiction in tackling impunity and crimes against humanity . It strongly encourages the EU and its Member States to use every diplomatic opportunity and diplomatic instrument to press for effective cooperation with the ICC, in particular with regard to the execution of pending arrest warrants. It also encourages the EU and its Member States, with the help of the EEAS, to put in place a set of stringent internal guidelines outlining a code of conduct for contact between EU and Member State officials and persons wanted by the ICC, in particular when the latter still occupy official posts. In the event of a partner country issuing an invitation to, or expressing a willingness to allow, visits on its territory by an individual who is the subject of an ICC arrest warrant, Parliament asks the EU and its Member States to exert strong pressure on that country without delay, with a view to either arresting or supporting an arrest operation or, as a minimum, to preventing the travel of such an individual. It notes that recently such invitations have been issued to Sudan's president Omar al-Bashir by Chad, China, Djibouti, Kenya and Malaysia among others without arresting him and surrendering him to the Court.
Execution of arrest warrants : the plenary notes in an oral amendment that the majority of the 17 arrest warrants issued by the ICC have not yet been implemented, including those against Joseph Kony and other leaders of the Lord's Resistance Army in respect of the situation in Northern Uganda, Bosco Ntaganda of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ahmad Muhammad Harun, Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman and President Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir of Sudan, and Muammar Mohammed Abu Minyar Gaddafi, Saif al-Islam Gaddafi and Abdullah Al-Senussi of Libya. In regard to Libya, Parliament recognises the recent decision by the ICC Prosecutor to issue arrest warrants for Colonel Gaddafi, his son Saif al-Islam and intelligence chief Abdullah al-Sanoussi, in relation to the alleged crimes against humanity in their country since the beginning of the insurrection. It stresses that their successful capture, and subsequent trial by the ICC, will serve as a crucial contribution to the fight against impunity in the region .
African States : Parliament notes that African States had a major role in creating the ICC and regards their support and close cooperation as indispensable to the Court's effective functioning and independence. It calls on the African States Parties to the Rome Statute of the ICC to fulfil their obligations under the ICC Rome Statute and actively to support the task of holding the world's worst offenders to account and break the cycle of impunity.
Actions in support of the ICC's work: Parliament proposes a series of measures to support the ICC, the main ones being as follows:
mainstreaming the work of the ICC and the provisions of the Rome Statute in its development programmes aimed at strengthening the rule of law; providing the necessary technical, logistical and financial assistance and expertise to developing countries which have only limited resources with which to adapt their national legislation to the principles of the Rome Statute; application by the EEAS and the diplomatic services of the EU Member States in a systematic and targeted manner of the diplomatic tools used by them both to raise support for the ICC and to promote wider ratification and implementation of the Rome Statute (include démarches, political declarations, statements, and ICC clauses in agreements with third countries); the High Representative/Vice-President and the EU Member States to launch diplomatic efforts to encourage UN Security Council members to pursue referrals to the ICC to open investigations into cases in which officials from States which are not a party to the Statute continue to enjoy ongoing impunity, including the recent situations in Iran, Syria, Bahrain, and Yemen; calling on more Asian, North African, Middle Eastern and Sub-Saharan countries to become parties to the Rome Statute; promoting the universality of the Rome Statute in the context of EU relations with third countries within the framework of the Cotonou Agreement; pursuing more systematically the inclusion of an ICC clause in negotiating mandates and agreements with third countries.
Parliament stresses the need for the ICC to expand its focus beyond situations of armed conflict and, more proactively, to investigate human rights emergencies that escalate to the level of crimes against humanity .
Other more targeted measures proposed include the following : (i) calling on Turkey, the only official EU candidate that has not yet done so, to become a State Party to the Rome Statute; ii) affirming the crucial role of the EU Member States' diplomatic support for the ICC's mandate and for its activities in UN fora ; (iii) enhancing diplomatic efforts to foster greater support for the Court in the UN Security Council, particularly for genocide; (iv) ensuring that coordination and cooperation with the ICC is included in the mandate of relevant regional EU Special Representatives (EUSRs) and the appointment of an EUSR on International Humanitarian Law and International Justice with the mandate to promote, mainstream and represent the EU's commitment to the fight against impunity and the ICC across EU foreign policies; (v) mainstreaming the ICC across the EU's foreign policy priorities; (vi) ensuring that the EEAS has the necessary expertise and high-level capacity to make the ICC a real priority; (vii) making every effort to prosecute and punish the perpetrators of sex crimes against humanity .
Parliament also considers that the effectiveness of the principle of complementarity of the Court lies in the primary obligation of its States Parties to investigate and prosecute war crimes , genocide and crimes against humanity. It expresses concern that not all of the EU Member States have legislation defining these crimes under national law over which their courts can exercise jurisdiction.
2) The need to ensure further financial and logistical assistance for the Court : Parliament welcomes the EU's and individual Member States' support for the ICC thus far and recommends that current forms of support are continued . It calls on the EU and its Member States to support the Court's efforts to enhance its field presence, as well as assisting communities victimised by crimes falling under the Court's jurisdiction. It recommends that Member States continue to provide adequate funding for the ICC Trust Fund for Victims (in order to complement potential upcoming reparation awards while continuing to carry out current assistance activities) and to contribute to the newly established ICC Special Fund for Relocations, and other related Funds. Adequate and stable funding is also required for civil society actors working on ICC-related issues within the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR). The resolution also encourages Member States and the EEAS to start discussions relating to the review of current EU financial instruments, in particular the European Development Fund (EDF), with a view to examining how they could further contribute to supporting complementary activities in beneficiary countries in order to boost the fight against impunity. All the ICC States Parties are asked to promote joint efforts to improve trials at national level of the most serious crimes.
Lastly, Parliament recalls that the European Parliament was one of the earliest vocal supporters of the Court and calls for the insertion of a section on the fight against impunity and the ICC in the EP Annual Report on Human Rights in the world. It suggests that the European Parliament play a more proactive role by promoting and mainstreaming the fight against impunity and the ICC in all EU policies and institutions.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Wolfgang KREISSL-DÖRFLER (S&D, DE) on EU support for the International Criminal Court: facing challenges and overcoming difficulties.
Members begin by recalling that the ICC is the first permanent international judicial body capable of trying individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, thus making a decisive contribution to upholding human rights and to international law by combating impunity. The Court plays a crucial deterrent role in sending a clear signal that impunity for these crimes will not be tolerated , thus contributing to security, justice and the rule of law as well as to the preservation of peace and the strengthening of international security.
However, Members stress that the fight against impunity can only succeed when all States Parties cooperate fully with the ICC, and when non-parties also provide assistance to the judicial institution.
Accordingly, the report makes certain observation and recommendations on strengthening cooperation.
1)T he need to enhance support for the Court through political and diplomatic action: Members reiterate their full support for the ICC, the Rome Statute and the international criminal justice system, the Prosecutor’s proprio motu powers and the progress in initiating new investigations. They urge Parties and non-parties to the Rome Statute to refrain from exercising political pressure on the Court in order to preserve and guarantee its impartiality and to allow for justice to be dispensed based on law, rather than on political considerations.
Members underline the importance of the principle of universality, and call on the EEAS, the EU Member States and the Commission to continue their vigorous efforts to promote universal ratification of the Rome Statute and the Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the International Criminal Court (APIC) and national implementing legislation.
Welcoming the revised EU Action Plan agreed on 12 July 2011 which outlines effective, concrete measures to be taken by the EU to deepen its future support for the Court, Members stress that full and prompt cooperation between States Parties, including EU Member States, and the Court remains essential to the effectiveness and success of the international criminal justice system. They call on the EU and its Member States to comply with all requests by the Court to provide assistance and cooperation in a timely manner to ensure, inter alia , the execution of pending arrest warrants and the provision of information, including requests aimed at helping to identify, freeze and seize the financial assets of suspects.
Member States are also called upon to:
enact national legislation on cooperation and to conclude framework agreements with the ICC for the enforcement of the Court’s sentences and on matters of investigation; transfer competences to the EU in the area of identification and confiscation of assets of persons indicted by the ICC, notwithstanding the fact that judicial proceedings are initiated by the ICC; cooperate in exchanging relevant information through the existing Asset Recovery Offices as well as through the Camden Asset Recovery Inter-Agency Network (CARIN); ratify the amendments agreed at the Kampala Review Conference of amendments to the Rome Statute relating to the crime of aggression.
Fight against impunity for the worst crimes known to humanity : Members welcome the contribution of some EU Member States to the fight against impunity for the worst crimes known to humanity through the application of universal jurisdiction . They u nderline the fundamental role of international criminal jurisdictions in addressing the relevant violations of international law concerning the illegal recruitment of child soldiers. They firmly oppose children under the age of 18 years being conscripted into the armed forces or used in any way in military action.
Full cooperation with the ICC: Members take note of the Cooperation and Assistance Agreement between the EU and the ICC and call on EU Member States to apply the principle of universal jurisdiction in tackling impunity and crimes against humanity . They strongly encourage the EU and its Member States to use every diplomatic opportunity and diplomatic instrument to press for effective cooperation with the ICC, in particular with regard to the execution of pending arrest warrants. They also encourage the EU and its Member States, with the help of the EEAS, to put in place a set of stringent internal guidelines outlining a code of conduct for contact between EU and Member State officials and persons wanted by the ICC, in particular when the latter still occupy official posts. In the event of a partner country issuing an invitation to, or expressing a willingness to allow, visits on its territory by an individual who is the subject of an ICC arrest warrant, Members ask the EU and its Member States to exert strong pressure on that country without delay, with a view to either arresting or supporting an arrest operation or, as a minimum, to preventing the travel of such an individual. They note that recently such invitations have been issued to Sudan’s president Omar al-Bashir by Chad, China, Djibouti, Kenya and Malaysia among others without arresting him and surrendering him to the Court.
Execution of arrest warrants: the report notes that the majority of the 18 arrest warrants issued by the ICC have not yet been implemented, including those against Joseph Kony and other leaders of the Lord’s Resistance Army in respect of the situation in Northern Uganda, Bosco Ntaganda of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ahmad Muhammad Harun, Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman and President Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir of Sudan, and Muammar Mohammed Abu Minyar Gaddafi, Saif al-Islam Gaddafi and Abdullah Al-Senussi of Libya. Members recognise the recent decision by the ICC Prosecutor to issue arrest warrants for Colonel Gaddafi, his son Saif al-Islam and intelligence chief Abdullah al-Sanoussi, in relation to the alleged crimes against humanity and stress that their successful capture, and subsequent trial by the ICC, will serve as a crucial contribution to the fight against impunity in the region.
African States : Members note that African States had a major role in creating the ICC and regards their support and close cooperation as indispensable to the Court’s effective functioning and independence. They call on the African States Parties to the Rome Statute of the ICC to fulfil their obligations under the ICC Rome Statute and actively to support the task of holding the world’s worst offenders to account and break the cycle of impunity.
Actions in support of the ICC’s work : Members propose a series of measures to support the ICC, the main ones being as follows:
mainstreaming the work of the ICC and the provisions of the Rome Statute in its development programmes aimed at strengthening the rule of law; providing the necessary technical, logistical and financial assistance and expertise to developing countries which have only limited resources with which to adapt their national legislation to the principles of the Rome Statute; application by the EEAS and the diplomatic services of the EU Member States in a systematic and targeted manner of the diplomatic tools used by them both to raise support for the ICC and to promote wider ratification and implementation of the Rome Statute (include démarches , political declarations, statements, and ICC clauses in agreements with third countries); the High Representative/Vice-President and the EU Member States to launch diplomatic efforts to encourage UN Security Council members to pursue referrals to the ICC to open investigations into cases in which officials from States which are not a party to the Statute continue to enjoy ongoing impunity, including the recent situations in Iran, Syria, Bahrain, and Yemen; calling on more Asian, North African, Middle Eastern and Sub-Saharan countries to become parties to the Rome Statute; promoting the universality of the Rome Statute in the context of EU relations with third countries within the framework of the Cotonou Agreement; pursuing more systematically the inclusion of an ICC clause in negotiating mandates and agreements with third countries. Members stress the need for the ICC to expand its focus beyond situations of armed conflict and, more proactively, to investigate human rights emergencies that escalate to the level of crimes against humanity.
Other measures proposed include the following: i) calling on Turkey, the only official EU candidate that has not yet done so, to become a State Party to the Rome Statute ; ii) a ffirming the crucial role of the EU Member States’ diplomatic support for the ICC’s mandate and for its activities in UN fora ; iii) enhancing diplomatic efforts to foster greater support for the Court in the UN Security Council, particularly for genocide ; iv) ensuring that coordination and cooperation with the ICC is included in the mandate of relevant regional EU Special Representatives (EUSRs); v) mainstreaming the ICC across the EU’s foreign policy priorities; vi) ensuring that the EEAS has the necessary expertise and high-level capacity to make the ICC a real priority; vii) making every effort to prosecute and punish the perpetrators of sex crimes against humanity .
Members also consider that the effectiveness of the principle of complementarity of the Court lies in the primary obligation of its States Parties to investigate and prosecute war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. They express concern that not all of the EU Member States have legislation defining these crimes under national law over which their courts can exercise jurisdiction.
2) The need to ensure further financial and logistical assistance for the Court: Members w elcome the EU’s and individual Member States’ support for the ICC thus far and recommends that current forms of support are continued. They call on the EU and its Member States to support the Court’s efforts to enhance its field presence, as well as assisting communities victimised by crimes falling under the Court’s jurisdiction. They recommend that Member States continue to provide adequate funding for the ICC Trust Fund for Victims (in order to complement potential upcoming reparation awards while continuing to carry out current assistance activities) and to contribute to the newly established ICC Special Fund for Relocations, and other related Funds. Adequate and stable funding is also required for civil society actors working on ICC-related issues within the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR). The report also encourages Member States and the EEAS to start discussions relating to the review of current EU financial instruments, in particular the European Development Fund (EDF) , with a view to examining how they could further contribute to supporting complementarity activities in beneficiary countries in order to boost the fight against impunity . A ll the ICC States Parties are asked to promote joint efforts to improve trials at national level of the most serious crimes.
Lastly, Members recall that the European Parliament was one of the earliest vocal supporters of the Court and calls for the insertion of a section on the fight against impunity and the ICC in the EP Annual Report on Human Rights in the world. They suggest that the European Parliament play a more proactive role by promoting and mainstreaming the fight against impunity and the ICC in all EU policies and institutions
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0507/2011
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0368/2011
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0368/2011
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE472.043
- Committee opinion: PE469.702
- Committee opinion: PE469.844
- Committee draft report: PE467.296
- Committee draft report: PE467.296
- Committee opinion: PE469.844
- Committee opinion: PE469.702
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE472.043
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0368/2011
Activities
- Wolfgang KREISSL-DÖRFLER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Diana WALLIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara LOCHBIHLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
266 |
2011/2109(INI)
2011/08/31
FEMM
31 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) (Aa) whereas the UN Declaration on the Protection of Women and Children in Emergency and Armed Conflict of 14 December 1974 calls for effective measures against the persecution, torture, violent and degrading treatment of women;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Urges the EU Member States parties to the Rome Statute to support the ICC in its work and calls for active international support for the ICC so as to end the ongoing de facto impunity of persons responsible for such acts of violence and finally bring them to justice;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Emphasises the importance of including gender-based crimes in the investigations and prosecutions of the ICC;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. emphasizes on the importance for the ICC to fight against exemption of punishment of sexual violence against women in conflicted areas and during the occurrence of war crimes
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Strongly suggests that psychological, medical and legal counselling is provided to victims of sexual violence, as well as easy access to witness protection programmes in order to encourage them to testify against their perpetrators, without fear;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1 c. Asks for the impunity issue to be considered as a key factor in securing justice and it must not be negotiable; underlines that the perpetrators must be brought to justice and face the penal consequences of their actions;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is firmly opposed to children under the age of 15 years being conscripted or recruited into the armed forces or used in any way in military actions; points out the importance of safeguarding their rights to a peaceful childhood, education, physical integrity, safety and sexual autonomy;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Calls for the establishment of enhancing mechanisms, which should ensure that victims’ participation at the ICC have substantive impact, including the development of a more accessible legal aid scheme, policies which are responsive to the participation of victims of sexual violence among other marginalised groups, and a comprehensive security framework inclusive of victims and intermediaries;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Advocates for effective policies and procedures to support the ICC, such as the documentation of gender-based crimes in armed conflicts, the participation of victims before the ICC, the training of lawyers, judges and activists on the Rome Statute and on international jurisprudence, regarding gender-based crimes;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Council and the Commission to continue their efforts to broaden the membership of the Rome Statute of the ICC and to promote its universal ratification with a view to effectively preventing serious crimes and ending impunity for their perpetrators;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas a great number of women and children are raped and persecuted in armed conflicts, and often continue to be raped and persecuted after the conflicts have ended;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Presidency of the EU Council and the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to cooperate closely with the ICC and to stress within international fora the need for states parties to the Rome Statute of the ICC to fulfil their obligations in terms of justice and responsibility;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Presidency of the EU Council and the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to cooperate closely with the ICC and to
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Expects the issue of violence against women and children in international conflict situations to be addressed in UN resolutions and actions, as well as peace processes and their agreements to comply with international law and UN Security Council Resolutions on women, peace and security; Calls for stronger and more consistent jurisprudence on gender-based crimes from international criminal tribunals;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Expects the issue of violence against women and children in international conflict situations to be addressed in UN resolutions and actions, and also hopes that particular attention will be paid to post-conflict situations;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Expects the issue of violence against women and children in international conflict situations to be addressed in UN resolutions and actions, so that this issue will also feature more prominently in the work of the ICC;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Expects the issue of violence against women and children in international conflict situations to continue to be addressed in UN
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Expects the issue of violence against women and children in international conflict situations to be addressed
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the European External Action Service to cooperate closely with the UN Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict in order to strengthen the work of the ICC in this area.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas a great number of women and children are raped
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the European External Action Service to exchange good practices and to cooperate closely with the UN Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict.
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Calls on the Commission to make more funding available for projects to support the ICC and international criminal justice;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas a great number of women and children are raped and persecuted in armed conflicts, and whereas sexual violence against women and children is increasingly used as a weapon of war in such situations;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the 2010 State of World Population report shows that violence against women in crisis areas has increased worldwide and that a great number of women and children are raped and persecuted in armed conflicts
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas the International Criminal Court (ICC) faces difficulties in
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas the International Criminal Court (ICC) faces difficulties in prosecuting those responsible for large- scale crimes against women and children thus allowing perpetrators, often, to go unpunished,
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Strongly condemns the use of sexual violence by war criminals during and after conflicts, including crimes such as mass rape, sexual
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Strongly condemns the use of sexual violence
source: PE-470.081
2011/09/06
DEVE
14 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Strongly encourages the European Union, including the EEAS, and the
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasises that, in implementing policies which may affect developing countries, the EU has an obligation under the Treaty to take account of development cooperation objectives, the primary one being the reduction and eventual eradication of poverty (Article 208(1) TFEU, second indent); firmly reminds the Member States and the EEAS, therefore, that, should they initiate discussions among themselves concerning funding instruments for external action, they must comply rigorously with this Treaty requirement; places equal emphasis on the fact that, in the context of aid programmes for developing countries, policy coherence means, first and foremost, the coherence of policies designed to further the development of those countries and thus to reduce their level of poverty;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Urges both EU Member States and developing countries to step up cooperation with the Court, by concluding agreements on the enforcement of sentences, as well as on the protection of witnesses and victims;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Draws attention to the principle of EU external policy coherence, under which the Union has a duty in its external activities to promote democracy, independent and impartial justice and basic human rights;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Expresses concern for the failure to execute the ICC warrant for the arrest of the Sudanese President al - Bashir.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Draws attention to its resolution of 4 September 2008 on the evaluation of EU sanctions as part of the EU’s actions and policies in the area of human rights; emphasises that there is a growing international consensus to the effect that any serious and deliberate damage to the environment undermines international peace and security and constitutes a violation of human rights; takes the view that any deliberate and irreversible degradation of the environment constitutes a threat to security and a serious violation of human rights; therefore encourages the inclusion of crimes against the environment as crimes against humanity; calls on the ICC to include any deliberate and irreversible damage caused to the environment among the grounds which may lead to the adoption of sanctions.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Strongly encourages the EEAS and the diplomatic services of the EU Member
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Strongly encourages the EEAS and the diplomatic services of the EU Member States systematically to
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasises the key role that the EU must play in strengthening the rule of law, promoting its universal application and maintaining the integrity of the Rome Statute – Europe itself having experienced violations of international humanitarian law, including crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide; asks the EU, therefore, to pursue its awareness-raising and information work at local level and to educate young people about international criminal law and the role of the ICC;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Encourages the ICC and the EU to prioritise support for the strengthening of independent and impartial national judicial systems; points out that justice is one of the fundamental rights, that it must be exercised firstly at national level, the judicial system permitting, and that cases should be referred to the ICC only as a last resort;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges the crucial role of the ICC in the context of EU foreign policy, in terms of the very development of that policy as well as of the adequate funding and staffing of both the EEAS headquarters and the delegations,
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges the crucial role of the ICC in the context of EU foreign policy, in terms of the very development of that policy as well as of the adequate funding and staffing of both the EEAS headquarters and the delegations, but emphasises that, in implementing policies which may affect developing countries, the EU has an obligation under the Treaty to take account of development cooperation objectives, the primary one being the reduction and eventual eradication of poverty (Article 208(1) TFEU, second indent);
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges the crucial role of the ICC in the context of EU foreign policy
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Acknowledges the crucial role of the ICC in the context of EU foreign policy, in terms of the very development of that policy as well as of the adequate funding and staffing of both the EEAS headquarters and the delegations
source: PE-472.061
2011/09/29
AFET
221 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 – having regard to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide that entered into force on 12 January 1951,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 – having regard to the relevant UN Security Council
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 d (new) 6d. Regrets that the Court, according to the results of the Kampala Conference, would not be able to exercise its jurisdiction over the crime of aggression until after January 2017, when a decision is to be made by States Parties to activate this jurisdiction;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Recommends that the role of the EU Network of Contact Points for War Crimes, Crimes against Humanity and Genocide in facilitating cooperation between EU law enforcement authorities in the prosecution of serious crimes should continue to be strengthened; underlines the fundamental role of international criminal jurisdictions in fighting impunity and addressing the relevant violations of international law concerning the illegal use and recruitment of child soldiers;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Urges the European Union and its Member States to ensure the existence of training programmes for, but not limited to, police investigators, prosecutors, judges, army officials that focus, first, on the provisions of the Rome Statute and the relevant international law and, second, on the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of violations of these principles;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Takes note of the Cooperation and Assistance Agreement between the EU and the ICC; calls on the EU Member States to apply the principle of universal jurisdiction in tackling impunity and crimes against humanity, and highlights its importance for the effectiveness and success of the international criminal justice system;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Strongly encourages the EU and its Member States to
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Strongly encourages the EU and its Member States, with the help of the EEAS, to put in place a set of internal guidelines, modelled on existing UN and ICC guidelines, outlining a code of conduct for contact between EU and Member State officials and persons wanted by the ICC, in particular when the latter still occupy official posts, regardless of their status and whether they are nationals of non- states parties to the Rome Statute;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Strongly encourages the EU and its Member States, with the help of the EEAS, to put in place a set of internal guidelines, modelled on existing UN and ICC guidelines, outlining a code of conduct for contact between EU and Member State officials and persons wanted by the ICC, in particular when the latter still occupy official posts;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Strongly encourages the EU and its Member States, with the help of the EEAS, to put in place a set of stringent internal guidelines, modelled on
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) - having regard to the Council Decision 2002/494/JHA of 13 June 2002 setting up a European network of contact points in respect of persons responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes and Council Decision 2003/335/JHA of 8 May 2003 on the investigation and prosecution of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes,
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Strongly encourages the EU and its Member States, with the help of the EEAS, to put in place a set of internal guidelines, modelled on existing UN guidelines, outlining a code of conduct for contact between EU and Member State officials and persons wanted by the ICC, in particular when the latter still occupy official posts; regardless of their status and whether they are nationals of non- states parties to the Rome Statute;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Asks the EU and its Member States, in the event of a partner country issuing an invitation to an individual who is the subject of an ICC arrest warrant, to exert strong pressure on that country without delay (for instance, through the withdrawal of development aid) with a view to preventing the travel of such an individual, such invitations having been issued recently by Chad, China, Djibouti, Kenya and Malaysia, among others;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Asks the EU and its Member States, in the event of a partner country issuing an invitation to or expressing a willingness to allow visits on their territories by an individual who is the subject of an ICC arrest warrant, to exert strong pressure on that country without delay, with a view to either to arrest or support an arrest operation or, at a minimum, to prevent
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Asks the EU and its Member States, in the event of a partner country issuing an invitation to or expressing a willingness to allow visits on their territories by an individual who is the subject of an ICC arrest warrant, to exert strong pressure on that country without delay, with a view to
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Recognises the recent decision by the ICC prosecutor to issue arrest warrants for Colonel Gaddafi, his son Said al Islam and intelligence chief Abdullah al Sanoussi, in relation to the alleged crimes against humanity since the beginning of the country's uprising; stresses that their successful capture, and subsequent trial by the ICC, will serve as a crucial contribution to the fight against impunity in the region;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Expresses its deep concern that ICC States Parties such as Chad, Djibouti and Kenya have recently welcomed Sudan
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Stresses the importance of a strong EU action to anticipate and avoid or condemn such instances of non- cooperation; and encourages the EU (and Member States) to set-up an internal protocol with concrete and standard actions enabling them to respond timely and consistently to instances of non- cooperation with the Court, when appropriate in coordination with mechanisms of other relevant institutions, including the Assembly of States Parties;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Stresses the importance of a strong EU action to anticipate and avoid or condemn such instances of non- cooperation; encourages the EU and Member States to set-up an internal protocol with concrete and standard actions enabling them to respond timely and consistently to instances of non- cooperation with the Court, when appropriate in coordination with mechanisms of other relevant institutions, including the Assembly of States Parties;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers support for the ICC on the part of African states to be an indispensible factor in facilitating the Court’s work and in determining its effectiveness and demands that a linkage be established between such support and development cooperation with the EU and its Member States, so as to provide a credible means of exerting pressure;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 11 a (new) - having regard to the Council Decision 2002/494/JHA of 13 June 2002 setting up a European network of contact points in respect of persons responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes and Council Decision 2003/335/JHA of 8 May 2003 on the investigation and prosecution of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes,
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12.
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the African States Parties to the Rome Statute of the ICC to ensure an increase, rather than a decrease, in African Union (AU) support for the task of
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the African States Parties to the Rome Statute of the ICC to
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the African States Parties to the Rome Statute of the ICC to
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the African States Parties to the Rome Statute of the ICC to ensure an increase, rather than a decrease, in African Union (AU) support for the task of holding the world’s worst offenders to account; expresses support for the Court’s request to open a liaison office with the African Union in Addis Ababa;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Expresses its concern about the fact that so far the ICC has only investigated cases located in Africa; underlines that this ICC conduct created legitimate criticism and concern, and invites the ICC Prosecutor to balance the geographical scope of the Court;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Urges the EU and its Member States to mainstream the work of the ICC and the provisions of the Rome Statute in its rule of law development programmes; calls on the EU and its Member States to provide the necessary technical, logistical and financial assistance and expertise to developing countries that have limited resources to adapt their national legislation to the principles of the Rome Statute and to cooperate with the ICC, no matter whether these countries have ratified or not the Statute; further encourages the EU and its Member States to support training programmes for the police, judicial, military and administrative authorities of developing countries introducing them to the provisions of the Rome Statute;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the EU and its Member States to continue the dialogue with the AU on these matters and to support African States Parties in continuing to abide by their obligations under the Rome Statute; Expresses support for the Court’s request to open a liaison office with the African Union in Addis Ababa;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the EU and its Member States to continue the dialogue with the AU on these matters and to support African States Parties in continuing to abide by their obligations under the Rome Statute;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 12 a (new) - having regard Review Conference of the Rome Statute concluded in Kampala (June 2010), Uganda whereas one of the main developments during the conference was an agreement on a mechanism by which the crime of aggression could be prosecuted at the International Criminal Court,
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Welcomes recent statements by the ICC Prosecutor that his office is examining, in view of possible future actions, a number of situations on various continents, including cases in Afghanistan, Colombia, Honduras, Republic of Korea and Palestine;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. The universality of the Rome Statute (New heading)
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Encourages the next ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly to discuss the fight against impunity in international development cooperation and relevant political dialogue, as advocated in several resolutions and in Article 11.6 of the revised Cotonou Agreement, with a view to mainstreaming the fight against impunity and the strengthening of the rule of law within existing development cooperation programmes and actions;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Encourages the next ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly to discuss the fight against impunity in international development cooperation and relevant political dialogue, as advocated in several resolutions and in Article 11.6 of the revised Cotonou Agreement, with a view to mainstreaming the fight against impunity and the strengthening of the rule of law within existing development cooperation programmes and actions;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Encourages the EEAS and the diplomatic services of the EU Member States to
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Encourages the EEAS and the diplomatic services of the EU Member States to systematically monitor the impact of the
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Encourages the EEAS and the diplomatic services of the EU Member States to systematically monitor the impact of the diplomatic tools used by them both to raise support for the ICC and to promote wider ratification and implementation of the Rome Statute; notes that these tools include, inter alia, démarches, political declarations, statements, and ICC clauses in agreements with third countries, as well as political and human rights dialogues and that, as and when necessary, appropriate action should be taken based on the results of such impact assessments;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Stresses the need for the ICC to expand its focus beyond situations of armed conflict and more proactively investigate human rights emergencies that rise to the level of crimes against humanity, and where domestic authorities are demonstrably unwilling to investigate, prosecute and punish alleged offenders;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Urges that the High Representative / Vice President and the EU Member States launch diplomatic efforts to encourage UN Security Council members to pursue referrals to the ICC to open investigations into cases in which officials from states not a party to the Statute have allegedly engaged in crimes against humanity but continue to enjoy ongoing impunity, including the recent situations in Iran, Syria, Bahrain, and Yemen;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Recognises the role of the EU in promoting the universality of the Rome Statute and of the Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the Court (APIC) and welcomes the recent accessions to/ratifications of the Rome Statute by the Philippines, Tunisia, Granada, Moldova, St Lucia and the Seychelles, which brought the total number of States Parties to 11
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the fight against impunity, justice and the rule of law are the pillars of sustainable peace, in that they guarantee human rights and fundamental freedoms,
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Recognises the role of the EU in promoting the universality of the Rome Statute and of the Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the Court (APIC) and welcomes the recent accessions to/ratifications of the Rome Statute by the Philippines, Tunisia
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Recognises the role of the EU in promoting the universality of the Rome Statute and of the Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the Court (APIC) and welcomes the recent accessions to/ratifications of the Rome Statute by Tunisia, the Philippines, Gr
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Recognises the role of the EU in promoting the universality of the Rome Statute and of the Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the Court (APIC) and welcomes the recent accessions to/ratifications of the Rome Statute by the Philippines, Tunisia, Granada, Moldova, St Lucia and the Seychelles, which brought the total number of States Parties to 11
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Recognises the role of the EU in promoting the universality of the Rome Statute and of the Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the Court (APIC) and welcomes the recent accessions to/ratifications of the Rome Statute by Tunisia, Granada, Moldova, St Lucia
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Recognises the role of the EU in promoting the universality of the Rome Statute and of the Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the Court (APIC) and welcomes the recent accessions to/ratifications of the Rome Statute by Tunisia, Granada, Moldova, Philippines, St Lucia and the Seychelles, which brought the total number of States Parties to 116;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Recognises the role of the EU in
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Recommends that the EU, and particularly the EEAS, promote the universality of the Rome Statute and the fight against impunity, as well as respect for, cooperation with and assistance of the Court, including within the framework of the Cotonou Agreement and of dialogues between the EU and regional organisations, particularly the AU, the Arab League and the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN); emphasises also the importance of promoting the ratification and application of the Rome Statute for the Court in its bilateral dialogues on human rights with third countries;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Recommends that the EU, and particularly the EEAS, continue to promote the universality of the Rome Statute and
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Recommends that the EU, and particularly the EEAS, promote the universality of the Rome Statute and the fight against impunity, as well as respect for, cooperation with and assistance of the Court, including within the framework of the Cotonou Agreement and of dialogues between the EU and regional organisations, particularly the AU, the Arab League, the OSCE, and the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN);
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital -A a (new) -Aa. whereas as of September 2011 117 states have ratified the Rome Statute; nevertheless achieving its universal ratification should remain a primary objective,
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the Commission and EEAS to pursue more systematically the inclusion of an ICC clause in negotiating mandates and agreements with third countries;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the EU leaders to liaise with
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the EU leaders to liaise with
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the EU leaders to liaise with the key states that have not yet become party to the Rome Statute, particularly those that are permanent members of the UN Security Council (i.e. Russia, China and the United States), to encourage them
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Calls on the EU
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Welcomes the participation of the United States as an observer at the Assembly of States Parties of the ICC and
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Welcomes the participation of the United States as an observer at the Assembly of States Parties of the ICC and expresses the hope that it will soon become a State Party; calls on the US administration to further engage with the Court, including by fully cooperating in all situations which are the subject of an ICC investigation or preliminary analysis, including providing any relevant information to the Court and by completing a comprehensive policy towards the ICC;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Welcomes the participation of the United States as an observer at the Assembly of States Parties of the ICC and expresses the hope that it will
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Welcomes Tunisia
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the universal nature of justice implies its even application, free of exceptions and double standards; whereas no place should be a safe haven for those who have committed genocide, crimes against humanity, extrajudicial executions, war crimes, torture, mass rape or forced disappearances,
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Welcomes Tunisia's recent accession to the Rome Statute and hopes that this sends a positive signal to other North African and Middle Eastern countries, that they might follow suit; further welcomes the recent ratification of the Rome Statute by the Philippines thus increasing the number Asian States in the Court’s system, and the recent bill by the National Assembly of Cape Verde authorising ratification of the Rome Statute, hoping its Government will proceed accordingly without delay;
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Welcomes the Philippines' ratification of the Rome Statute as an important signal that Asian membership in the ICC is growing; welcomes Tunisia's recent accession to the Rome Statute and hopes that this sends a positive signal to other North African and Middle Eastern countries, that they might follow suit; welcomes the recent bill by the National Assembly of Cape Verde authorising ratification of the Rome Statute and encourages its government to proceed accordingly without delay; Expresses its hope that all Latin American countries will join the ICC;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Encourages Turkey
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20.
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Encourages Turkey, the only official EU candidate who has not yet done so, to become a State Party to the Rome Statute and to the Agreement on Privileges and Immunities (APIC) as soon as possible, stressing the need for any future candidate countries and potential candidate countries as well as the partner countries covered by the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) to do the same;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20.
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Calls on the EU and EU Member states to support the capacity and the political willingness of third states - in particular ICC situation countries and countries under preliminary analysis by the ICC - to undertake national proceedings on genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity; in that framework calls on the EU and its Member States to support reform processes and national capacity-building efforts aimed at strengthening the independent judiciary, the law- enforcement sector and the penitentiary system in all countries directly affected by the alleged commission of serious international crimes;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Stresses that the effectiveness of the principle of complementarity of the Court lays in the primary obligation of States Parties to investigate and prosecute war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity; expresses concern that not all of the EU Member States have legislation defining these crimes under national law over which their courts can exercise jurisdiction;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Urges those States that have not yet done so to enact full and effective implementing legislation in transparent consultation with civil society, and to endow their national judiciaries with the necessary tools to investigate and prosecute these crimes;
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 c (new) 20c. Calls on the EU and Member states to support the capacity and the political willingness of third states - in particular in ICC situation countries or under analysis - to undertake national proceedings on genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity; in that framework calls on the EU and its Member States to support reform processes and national capacity-building efforts aimed at strengthening the independent judiciary, the law- enforcement sector and the penitentiary system in all countries directly affected by the alleged commission of serious international crimes;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas justice should be seen as an indispensable element underpinning peacekeeping and conflict mitigation efforts; whereas Member States of the EU should never be safe havens for perpetrators of crimes under international law and international law permits and, in some instances, requires states to exercise universal jurisdiction over such crimes,
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Reaffirms the need for the EU and its Member States to enhance their diplomatic efforts among non-parties to the Rome Statute and regional organizations (e.g. AU, ASEAN, and the Arab League) to promote a better understanding of the mandate of the ICC, i.e. the pursuit of perpetrators of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide, including through the development of a special communication strategy for that matter;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Reaffirms the need for the EU and its Member States to enhance their diplomatic efforts to promote a better understanding of
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Affirms the crucial role of the EU Member States' diplomatic support for the ICC's mandate and for its activities in UN fora, including in the UN General Assembly and the UN Security Council;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Stresses the need for continued diplomatic efforts to encourage UN Security Council members to ensure the timely referral of cases, as most recently illustrated by the unanimous referral of the situation in Libya to the ICC by the UN Security Council; regrets the fact that no resolution has been adopted on Syria in this connection, as such a move is being blocked by Russia and China, permanent members of the Security Council;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Stresses the need for continued diplomatic efforts to encourage UN Security Council members to ensure the timely referral of cases, as postulated in Article 13 (b) of the Rome Statute and as most recently illustrated by the unanimous referral of the situation in Libya to the ICC by the UN Security Council; also expressed its hope that the UN Security Council will refrain from deferring investigations or prosecutions of the Court as postulated in Article 16 of the Rome Statute;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls on the UN Security Council's members to find a way for the UN to provide the Court with financial resources, in particular to cover costs related to the opening of investigations into situations referred by the UN Security Council
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls on the UN Security Council
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls on the UN Security Council
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Calls on the UN Security Council’s members to find a way for the UN to provide the Court with financial resources, in particular to cover costs related to the opening of investigations into situations referred by the UN Security Council and to ensure the execution of arrest warrants (arrest and transfer);
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas justice should be seen as an indispensable element underpinning peace
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Calls on the EU Member States to ensure that coordination and cooperation with the ICC is included in the mandate of relevant regional EU Special Representatives (EUSRs)
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Advises the EEAS to ensure that the ICC is mainstreamed across EU foreign policy priorities, to encourage transition states in the Southern Mediterranean to sign and ratify the Rome Statute;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26.
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Advises the EEAS to ensure that the ICC is mainstreamed across EU foreign policy priorities, in particular by systematically taking into account the fight against impunity and the principle of complementarity in the broader context of development and rule of law assistance;
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Advises the EEAS to ensure that the ICC
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27.
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27.
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27.
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Elections of judges and a Chief Prosecutor (New heading)
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. Urges all the States Parties to the ICC, the EU and the ICC itself, including the Office of the Prosecutor, to make every effort to prosecute and punish the perpetrators of sex crimes against humanity, which are a specific category of the crimes against humanity falling within the jurisdiction of the ICC (Article 7 of the Rome Statute) and include rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilisation and any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity, along with persecution on gender grounds; notes that such sex crimes are particularly despicable insofar as they are often perpetrated on a large scale and constitute war crimes as well as crimes against humanity (Article 8 of the Rome Statute), targeting the most vulnerable groups – women, children and civilians – in countries already weakened by conflicts and/or food shortages or famine;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Ca (new) Ca. whereas maintaining the independence of the ICC is crucial not only to ensure that it is fully effective, but also to promote the universality of the Rome Statute,
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28.
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. encourages promoting the debate for broadening the ICC's mandate to encompass crimes against the environment;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Welcomes the establishment of an advisory committee to receive and review all nominations of new judges as well as the establishment of a search committee for the ICC Prosecutor, and expresses its opinion that the work of the two committees should not be influenced by political considerations;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Stresses that States Parties should provide the Court with sufficient resources to effectively fulfil its judicial mandate and to deliver justice in a robust, fair, and effective manner;
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Stresses that States Parties should provide the Court with sufficient resources to effectively fulfil its judicial mandate and to deliver justice in a robust, fair, effective and meaningful manner;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 2 The need to ensure further
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Welcomes the EU's and Member States' financial and logistical support for the ICC thus far and recommends that current forms of support
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Welcomes
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Welcomes the EU
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29. Welcomes the EU’s financial and
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 – having regard to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide that entered into force on 12 January 1951,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 – footnote Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Stresses however, that increased EU funding should be additional and should not be used as a pretext by Member States to reduce their funding for core functions in the regular ICC budget;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Expresses concern that some States have stated that they will not agree with an increase of the Court’s budget (in 2012) despite the widespread and rampant impunity for international crimes around the world and a consequent increase in the Court’s activities;
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 b (new) 29b. Regrets that the lack of resources have been stated as a reason for the Court’s inability to ensure victims’ adequate and effective representative participation during ICC proceedings, in particular the inability of the Court’s Registry to process victims’ applications in time to allow for their participation in crucial hearings before the Court and the lack of meaningful consultation with victims on their choice of common legal representatives;
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 c (new) 29c. Stresses the significant impact of the Rome Statute system on victims, individuals and communities affected by the crimes under the Court’s jurisdiction; considers the Court’s outreach efforts crucial to promote understanding and support for its mandate, to manage expectations and to enable victims and affected communities to follow and understand the international criminal justice process and the work of the Court;
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Recommends that the EU and its Member States
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Recommends that the EU
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Recommends that the EU and its Member States increase their contributions to the ICC Trust Fund for the Victims
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Recommends that the EU
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Recommends that the EU and its Member States increase their contributions to the ICC Trust Fund for the Victims and to the
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Recommends that
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 a (new) 30a. Strongly supports the ICC's efforts to expand and strengthen its field presence as this is key to improving its ability to carry out its functions, including investigations, outreach to victims and affected communities, witness protection and facilitating victims' rights to participation and reparations and additionally, is a crucial factor in enhancing the Court's impact and its ability to leave a strong and positive legacy;
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Encourages the EU to secure adequate and stable funding for civil society actors working on ICC-related issues within the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR), and encourages the EU Member States and existing European foundations to
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Encourages the EU to
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Encourages the EU to
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 31. Encourages the EU to secure adequate and stable funding for civil society actors working on ICC-related issues within the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR), and encourages the EU Member States and existing European foundations to increase their funding for such actors; recommends that the EU Member States ensure adequate funding to the ICC Trust Fund for Victims (in order to complement potential upcoming reparation awards while continuing to carry out current assistance activities) and contribute to the newly established ICC Special Fund for relocations and to the Fund for family visits of detainees at the seat of the Court in The Hague;
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 31 a (new) 31a. Calls on EU Member States to actively support, including through financial means, civil society efforts to enforce victims' rights as well as the innovations introduced by the Rome Statute with respect to victims' participation in criminal proceedings;
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Encourages the EU Member States and the EEAS to
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Encourages the EU Member States and the EEAS to start discussions relating to the review of current EU financial instruments, in particular the European Development Fund (EDF), with a view to examining how they could further contribute to supporting complementarity activities in beneficiary countries in order to boost the fight against impunity within these countries;
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a (new) 34a. Suggests that the European Parliament plays an increased proactive role by promoting the objectives of the ICC in EU policies and the work of its delegations with 3rd countries;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the Rome Statute of the ICC makes a decisive contribution to the upholding of human rights
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a (new) 34a. Welcomes the initiative of the Commission of organising a seminar for European and African civil society to discuss international justice in Pretoria in April 2011, takes notes of the recommendations from that meeting and calls on the Commission to continue to support such opportunities;
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 a (new) 34a. Recalls that the European Parliament has been one of the earliest vocal supporters of the Court and notes its essential role in monitoring the EU action in this matter; calls for the insertion of a section on the fight against impunity and the ICC in the EP Annual Report on Human Rights in the world and further suggests that the European Parliament undertakes an increased proactive role, by promoting and mainstreaming the fight against impunity and the ICC in all EU policies and institutions, including in all the committees, groups and delegations with third countries;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas pursuing the "interests of justice" regardless of political considerations (Article 53 of the Rome Statute) is the founding principle of the court,
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the ICC is not only an instrument to fight impunity, but also the major alternative conceived so far to the practice of extrajudicial executions and death penalty in the international arena,
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas ICC plays a key role in promotion of international justice and thus contributing to security, justice and rule of law as well as to preservation of peace and strengthening of international security,
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new) Db. whereas the ICC is a capital step on the road of the civilization of international relations,
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D c (new) Dc. whereas the basic inspiration of ICC is to be found in the advancement of global peace and justice, and as such it is deeply coherent with the kind of international order envisioned by the founding fathers of the European Union,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D d (new) Dd. whereas a stronger ICC is a step toward the main goal of the Schuman declaration: building a lasting peace on the European continent and, more generally, "make war not only unthinkable but materially impossible",
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the ICC
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 – having regard to
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the ICC
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas, according to the principle of complementarity, the ICC only acts in instances where national courts are unable or unwilling to hold credible trials at home, these instances making international courts essential for holding perpetrators of the worst international crimes to account; whereas cooperation among States Parties to the Rome Statute and with regional organisations is of outmost importance, particularly in situations where the jurisdiction of the Court is being challenged,
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the International Criminal Court is an independent, permanent court that tries persons accused of the most serious crimes of international concern, namely genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes; whereas the ICC is a court of last resort that will only act when national courts are unable or unwilling to do so; whereas the ICC only acts in instances where national courts are unable or unwilling to hold credible trials at home, these instances making international courts essential for holding perpetrators of the worst international crimes to account,
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas the ICC's policy of 'positive complementarity' supports the capacity of national courts to investigate and prosecute war crimes,
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas EU Member States should never be safe havens for perpetrators of crimes under international law which, in some instances, requires states to exercise universal jurisdiction over such crimes,
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas Member States of the EU should never be safe havens for perpetrators of crimes under international law and international law permits and, in some instances, requires states to exercise universal jurisdiction over such crimes,
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the ICC is currently conducting investigations in seven countries (Uganda, Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Darfur region of Sudan, Central African Republic, Kenya and Libya), and the ICC prosecutor has recently requested the opening of an eighth investigation in Côte d'Ivoire, and has publicly announced that he is analyzing information regarding alleged crimes committed in several other situations,
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the ICC is currently conducting investigations in s
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the ICC is currently conducting investigations in s
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 – having regard to the Action Plan of 4 February 20049
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the ICC is currently conducting investigations in s
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the ICC is currently conducting investigations in s
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the ICC is currently conducting investigations in s
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the ICC prosecutor has recently requested the opening of a seventh investigation in Côte d’Ivoire and has publicly announced that it is analyzing information and looking into alleged crimes committed in several situations to determine whether to open new investigations, including Afghanistan, Colombia, Georgia, Guinea, Honduras, Republic of Korea, Nigeria, and Palestine,
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the ICC prosecutor's office is examining at least nine situations on four continents, including Afghanistan, Colombia, Georgia, Guinea, Honduras, Republic of Korea, Nigeria, and Palestine,
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas a large number of ICC arrest warrants are still pending, including those against Joseph Kony and other leaders of the Lord’s resistance army in respect of the situation in Northern Uganda, Bosco Ntaganda in the DRC, the Sudanese President al-Bashir and the Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi,
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas a large number of the 18 ICC arrest warrants are still pending, including those against the Sudanese President al- Bashir and the Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi,
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas the Court
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) - having regard to the Agreement between the International Criminal Court and the European Union on cooperation and assistance1, __________________ 1 OJ L 115, 28.4.2006, p.50
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas the Court
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas the Court's aim is to deliver justice for victims and affected communities in a comprehensive manner, including through participation, protection, legal representation and outreach activities,
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) Ja. whereas the court offers victims a right of participation supported by structures of witness protection,
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) Ja. whereas all the EU members are state parties of the Rome Statute and the EU itself signed a cooperation and assistance agreement with the ICC; whereas the EU member states are the biggest contributors to the ICC budget, while the EU through the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) funds individual projects in support of the ICC and international criminal justice,
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J a (new) Ja. whereas the system of reparations for the victims of the crimes within the competences of the Court makes the ICC a unique judicial institution on the international level,
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J b (new) Jb. whereas the success of the reparation proceedings starting in 2011 depends on the voluntary contributions by donors, as well as on the collection of fines and forfeiture from the convicted persons,
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas the Court is currently forced to deal with a rapidly increasing number of investigations, cases and preliminary examinations, while the annual budget is incommensurate with needs, remains unchanged and may even be decreased,
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas the Court is currently
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. whereas the ICC is a judicial, not a political, institution but is unfortunately increasingly subjected to unfair, politically motivated attacks,
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. whereas the first Review Conference on the Rome Statute of the ICC, which took place in Kampala, Uganda from 31 May to 11 June 2010, was a critical milestone in the evolution of the Rome Statute system,
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 – having regard to the Stockholm
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. whereas the first Review Conference on the Rome Statute held in Kampala in 2010, which was attended not just by the States Parties but also by international, parliamentary and civil society organisations, reaffirmed its commitment to justice and accountability,
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L a (new) La. whereas the fight against impunity can only succeed when all state-parties cooperate fully with the ICC, and when non-parties also provide assistance to the judicial institution,
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 1 Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 1 The need to enhance support and cooperation for the Court through political and diplomatic action
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Reiterates its full support for the ICC, the Rome Statute
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Reiterates its full support for the Office of Prosecutor; his proprio motu powers and progress in initiating new investigations;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Urges parties and non-parties to the Rome Statute to refrain from exercising political pressure on the Court in order to preserve and guarantee its impartiality and to allow for justice based on law, not political consideration, to take place;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that a relevant aspect of the establishment of the ICC is the substitution of many forms of primitive justice like vendetta and violent reprisal with the rule of law and third part justice;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Underlines the importance of the principle of universality, and calls on the EEAS, the EU Member States and the Commission to continue their vigorous efforts to promote universal ratification of the Rome Statute and the agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the International Criminal Court and national implementing legislation;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Confirms at the same time the priority of the jurisdiction of national criminal courts enshrined in the Rome Statute; is fully committed to ensuring that all States Parties to the Statute enhance their ability to prosecute the most serious violations of international law in their own countries or are enabled to do so through international and regional support and cooperation;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 – having regard to the Stockholm Programme 2010-2014 entitled ‘An Open and Secure Europe Serving and Protecting Citizens’ (December 2009)10 , and the Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme (April 2010),
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Notes that the first Review Conference of the Rome Statute, held in Kampala, from 31 May to 11 June 2010 was a momentous event for States Parties, as well as non-State Parties, international organisations, parliamentarians, civil society and other stakeholders, which strongly reaffirmed their commitment to justice and accountability and was a crucial step in the further development of the Court thanks to substantive discussions on the key current challenges it is facing;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Reiterates its full support for the Prosecutor in strictly following the judicial mandate of the ICC which is to apply international law without political considerations and without reference to political aims;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Emphasises that, although pursuing justice in conflict situations can be controversial when other immediate political needs are simultaneously being pursued, the ICC must be supported as justice is a necessary precondition for any peace process;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Follow-up on the Kampala conference (New heading)
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 c (new) Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes the adoption of amendments to the Rome Statute, including on the crime of aggression, and calls on all EU Member States to ratify them and integrate them into their national legislation;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Underscores the importance of the stocktaking segment devoted to the assessment of the impact and challenges encountered by the Rome Statute system since its creation; welcomes the meaningful engagement and discussions in the four areas of examination: complementarity; cooperation; the impact of the Rome Statute system on victims and affected communities; peace and justice; and suggests that States and the Court maintain a focus on such topics;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Cooperation between the European Union and its Member States and the International Criminal Court (New heading)
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 – having regard to the Stockholm Programme 2010-2014 entitled ‘An Open and Secure Europe Serving and Protecting Citizens’ (December 2009)10,
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Welcomes the
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses that full and prompt cooperation between state-parties, including EU Member States, and the Court remains essential to the effectiveness and success of the international criminal justice system;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls on the EU and its Member States to comply with all requests by the Court to provide assistance and cooperation in a timely manner to ensure, inter alia, the execution of pending arrest warrants and the provision of information, including requests aimed at helping to identify, freeze and seize the financial assets of suspects;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 a (new) - having regard to Council Decision 2002/494/JHA of 13 June 2002 setting up a European network of contact points in respect of persons responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes,2 and Council Decision 2003/335/JHA of 8 May 2003 on the investigation and prosecution of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes3, __________________ 2 OJ 167 of 26.6.2002, p. 1 3 OJ L 118 of 14.5.2003, p.12
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls additionally on all the EU Member States to sign framework agreements with the ICC in order to
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Encourages EU Member States to amend Article 83 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union to include the crimes under the jurisdiction of the ICC to the list of crimes for which the EU has competences; more specifically, urges EU Member States to transfer competences to the EU in the area of identification and confiscation of assets of indicted by the ICC persons, notwithstanding the fact that judicial proceedings are initiated by the ICC; calls on EU Member States to cooperate in exchanging relevant information through the existing Asset Recovery Offices as well as through the Camden Asset Recovery Inter-Agency Network (CARIN);
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that full and prompt cooperation between the EU, States parties and the Court remains essential to the effectiveness and success of the international criminal justice system; calls on the EU and its Member States to comply with all the requests by the Court to provide assistance and cooperation in a timely manner, to ensure, inter alia, the execution of the pending arrest warrants, regardless of the status of the person named in the warrant, and the provision of information, including those aimed at helping to identify, freeze, and seize financial assets of the suspects;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Urges EU Member States to fully integrate the provisions of the Rome Statute and the Agreement on Privileges and Immunities of the Court into their national legislation;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the adoption at the Kampala Review Conference of amendments to the Rome Statute relating to the crime of aggression and calls on all the EU Member States to ratify them and integrate them into their national legislation; recommends in this connection that, in the interests of safeguarding and strengthening the universality of the Rome Statute, efforts should be made to achieve a more far- reaching definition by joint agreement of the relevant offences and that the margin for discretion that currently exists in clearly establishing an act of aggression in breach of international law should be sharply circumscribed;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the adoption
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that the extension of the ICC mandate to the crime of aggression is a powerful contribution to the prevention of international war because it makes the starting of a war a criminal act for which individuals can be tried;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Reiterates the validity of the definition of the crime of aggression as adopted in the Kampala Conference as "the planning, preparation, initiation or execution, by a person in a position effectively to exercise control over or to direct the political or military action of a State, of an act of aggression which, by its character, gravity and scale, constitutes a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations";
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Underlines that jurisdiction over the crime of aggression was present in the Statute of the Court as its core competence from the beginning, but has not become operational immediately because of dissension among the 120 signatory countries of the Treaty of Rome;
source: PE-472.043
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE467.296New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-467296_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.844&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-469844_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.702&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-469702_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.043New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-472043_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0368_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0368_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111116&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-11-16-TOC_EN.html |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-368&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0368_EN.html |
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-368&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0368_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-507New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0507_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AFET/7/06191New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
other/0 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|