BETA
This is a historical view (2019/07/06)

Changes: 2023/08/03events.date, docs, events, docs.docs.url, 2021/12/18events.type, procedure.legal_basis, docs, docs.docs.url

View current state | View Changes for this date

Sorry, but we failed to recreate history before 2020-01-19T23:52:45


1994/2187(COS) Economic growth and environment

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ENVI BLOKLAND Johannes (icon: UEN UEN)
Committee Opinion ENER FERBER Markus (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion ECON RANDZIO-PLATH Christa (icon: PES PES)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 132

Events

1995/10/30
   Final act published in Official Journal
1995/10/11
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
1995/10/11
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
1995/10/11
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
1995/10/10
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Details

The rapporteur called on the Commission to define a strategy to allow a sustainable economic structure to be implemented no later than 2020. He regretted that the Council had withdrawn its plan for a CO 2 tax and called on the Commission to reconsider the possibility of introducing such a tax. Commissioner BJERREGAARD did not want to give an opinion on this matter; however, she hoped that the Member States would agree to establish a CO 2 tax as soon as possible.

1995/07/26
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
1995/07/26
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
1995/07/26
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
1995/06/29
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
1995/06/29
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
1995/05/24
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
1995/05/10
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
1995/04/27
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Details

The ESC welcomed the Commission Communication, which was intended to prompt a wide-ranging debate on the implications for European economic policy of the inclusion of the principle of sustainable growth respecting the environment, as enshrined in Article 2 of the Maastricht Treaty, and the principle that all Community policies should take account of environmental protection requirements. The ESC felt that environmental taxes and charges and, more generally, an ecologically-oriented taxation system, would prove to be effective, in a large number of cases, in achieving significant pollution abatement levels and reduced consumption of resources. However, there was also good reason to believe that other market-based instruments (deposit-refund systems, tradable permit systems, tax and financial incentives, voluntary agreements, civil liability for environmental damage) would be particularly effective in attaining certain specific objectives of environmental policy. As regards the impact of environmental taxes on growth and employment, the ESC believed that, given the fiscal neutrality of environmental taxes, their introduction would lead to a reform of existing tax systems in Member States. In fact, the introduction of new environmental taxes should be accompanied by a thorough analysis of existing tax systems and the environmental distortions they created. It should also provide the opportunity to review tax policy in general, making it more ecologically-oriented, whilst paying due attention to the need to safeguard international competitiveness. The ESC believed there was a need for close ties between environmental policy and employment policy. This could be brought about by encouraging ecological redeployment in manufacturing and services, and funding actions and programmes for cleaning up the environment. The ESC was aware that the transition towards sustainable development would not be automatic and, in conclusion, emphasised the need for a coherent, long-term policy strategy. This should be phased in gradually and predictably so as to limit adjustment costs and give economic agents time to adjust (cf. point 4, page 15 of the Communication). This, moreover, was the stance adopted by the ESC in its Opinion on CO 2 emissions and energy, particularly in point 1.2.3. Despite the need to simplify regulations, the Committee reiterated its reluctance to interpret the use of economic instruments in the environmental field as being part of the deregulation process, since the implementation of market-based instruments demanded a framework of regulatory and monitoring provisions.

1995/04/19
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
1995/02/02
   EP - FERBER Markus (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ENER
1994/12/20
   EP - BLOKLAND Johannes (UEN) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
1994/12/20
   EP - RANDZIO-PLATH Christa (PES) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
1994/11/30
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
1994/11/03
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published

Documents

  • Text adopted by Parliament, single reading: OJ C 287 30.10.1995, p. 0077-0118
  • Text adopted by Parliament, single reading: T4-0455/1995
  • Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T4-0455/1995
  • Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: OJ C 287 30.10.1995, p. 0004
  • Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A4-0206/1995
  • Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A4-0206/1995
  • Committee draft report: PE212.605
  • Amendments tabled in committee: PE212.605/AM
  • Committee opinion: PE212.369/DEF
  • Committee opinion: PE212.717/DEF
  • Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0405/1995
  • Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: OJ C 155 21.06.1995, p. 0001
  • Committee opinion: PE211.624/DEF
  • Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
  • Non-legislative basic document published: COM(1994)0465
  • Committee opinion: PE211.624/DEF
  • Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0405/1995 OJ C 155 21.06.1995, p. 0001
  • Committee opinion: PE212.717/DEF
  • Committee opinion: PE212.369/DEF
  • Committee draft report: PE212.605
  • Amendments tabled in committee: PE212.605/AM
  • Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: OJ C 287 30.10.1995, p. 0004 A4-0206/1995
  • Text adopted by Parliament, single reading: OJ C 287 30.10.1995, p. 0077-0118 T4-0455/1995

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection
committee
ENVI
rapporteur
name: BLOKLAND Johannes date: 1994-12-20T00:00:00 group: Europe of Nations (Coordination Group) abbr: UEN
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection
committee
ENVI
date
1994-12-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BLOKLAND Johannes group: Europe of Nations (Coordination Group) abbr: UEN
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: RANDZIO-PLATH Christa date: 1994-12-20T00:00:00 group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy
committee
ECON
date
1994-12-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: RANDZIO-PLATH Christa group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Research, Technological Development and Energy
committee
ENER
rapporteur
name: FERBER Markus date: 1995-02-02T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Research, Technological Development and Energy
committee
ENER
date
1995-02-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FERBER Markus group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
activities
  • date: 1994-11-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1994&nu_doc=465 title: COM(1994)0465 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:51994DC0465:EN body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 1994-11-30T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 1994-12-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PSE name: RANDZIO-PLATH Christa body: EP responsible: False committee: ENER date: 1995-02-02T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE name: FERBER Markus body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 1994-12-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: EDN name: BLOKLAND Johannes
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 1994-12-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PSE name: RANDZIO-PLATH Christa body: EP responsible: False committee: ENER date: 1995-02-02T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE name: FERBER Markus body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 1994-12-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: EDN name: BLOKLAND Johannes docs: type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A4-0206/1995 date: 1995-07-26T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 1995-10-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1995-10-11T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T4-0455/1995 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 1995-10-30T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection
committee
ENVI
date
1994-12-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BLOKLAND Johannes group: Europe of Nations (Coordination Group) abbr: UEN
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ECON
date
1994-12-20T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy
rapporteur
group: PSE name: RANDZIO-PLATH Christa
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy
committee
ECON
date
1994-12-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: RANDZIO-PLATH Christa group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ENER
date
1995-02-02T00:00:00
committee_full
ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy
rapporteur
group: PPE name: FERBER Markus
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Research, Technological Development and Energy
committee
ENER
date
1995-02-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FERBER Markus group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ENVI
date
1994-12-20T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection
rapporteur
group: EDN name: BLOKLAND Johannes
docs
  • date: 1995-04-19T00:00:00 docs: title: PE211.624/DEF committee: ECON type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 1995-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0405)(documentyear:1995)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES0405/1995 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:155:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 155 21.06.1995, p. 0001 summary: The ESC welcomed the Commission Communication, which was intended to prompt a wide-ranging debate on the implications for European economic policy of the inclusion of the principle of sustainable growth respecting the environment, as enshrined in Article 2 of the Maastricht Treaty, and the principle that all Community policies should take account of environmental protection requirements. The ESC felt that environmental taxes and charges and, more generally, an ecologically-oriented taxation system, would prove to be effective, in a large number of cases, in achieving significant pollution abatement levels and reduced consumption of resources. However, there was also good reason to believe that other market-based instruments (deposit-refund systems, tradable permit systems, tax and financial incentives, voluntary agreements, civil liability for environmental damage) would be particularly effective in attaining certain specific objectives of environmental policy. As regards the impact of environmental taxes on growth and employment, the ESC believed that, given the fiscal neutrality of environmental taxes, their introduction would lead to a reform of existing tax systems in Member States. In fact, the introduction of new environmental taxes should be accompanied by a thorough analysis of existing tax systems and the environmental distortions they created. It should also provide the opportunity to review tax policy in general, making it more ecologically-oriented, whilst paying due attention to the need to safeguard international competitiveness. The ESC believed there was a need for close ties between environmental policy and employment policy. This could be brought about by encouraging ecological redeployment in manufacturing and services, and funding actions and programmes for cleaning up the environment. The ESC was aware that the transition towards sustainable development would not be automatic and, in conclusion, emphasised the need for a coherent, long-term policy strategy. This should be phased in gradually and predictably so as to limit adjustment costs and give economic agents time to adjust (cf. point 4, page 15 of the Communication). This, moreover, was the stance adopted by the ESC in its Opinion on CO 2 emissions and energy, particularly in point 1.2.3. Despite the need to simplify regulations, the Committee reiterated its reluctance to interpret the use of economic instruments in the environmental field as being part of the deregulation process, since the implementation of market-based instruments demanded a framework of regulatory and monitoring provisions. type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
  • date: 1995-05-10T00:00:00 docs: title: PE212.717/DEF committee: ENER type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 1995-05-24T00:00:00 docs: title: PE212.369/DEF committee: EMPL type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 1995-06-29T00:00:00 docs: title: PE212.605 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 1995-06-29T00:00:00 docs: title: PE212.605/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 1995-07-26T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:287:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 287 30.10.1995, p. 0004 title: A4-0206/1995 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-10-11T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:287:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 287 30.10.1995, p. 0077-0118 title: T4-0455/1995 summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, single reading body: EP
events
  • date: 1994-11-03T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1994&nu_doc=465 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(1994)0465 summary:
  • date: 1994-11-30T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-07-26T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 1995-07-26T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: title: A4-0206/1995
  • date: 1995-10-10T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP summary: The rapporteur called on the Commission to define a strategy to allow a sustainable economic structure to be implemented no later than 2020. He regretted that the Council had withdrawn its plan for a CO 2 tax and called on the Commission to reconsider the possibility of introducing such a tax. Commissioner BJERREGAARD did not want to give an opinion on this matter; however, she hoped that the Member States would agree to establish a CO 2 tax as soon as possible.
  • date: 1995-10-11T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: title: T4-0455/1995 summary:
  • date: 1995-10-11T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 1995-10-30T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    ENVI/4/06171
    New
    • ENVI/4/06171
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 132
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 132
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 3.70 Environmental policy
    • 5.05 Economic growth
    New
    3.70
    Environmental policy
    5.05
    Economic growth
    activities
    • date: 1994-11-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1994&nu_doc=465 title: COM(1994)0465 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:51994DC0465:EN body: EC commission: type: Non-legislative basic document published
    • date: 1994-11-30T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 1994-12-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PSE name: RANDZIO-PLATH Christa body: EP responsible: False committee: ENER date: 1995-02-02T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE name: FERBER Markus body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 1994-12-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: EDN name: BLOKLAND Johannes
    • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 1994-12-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PSE name: RANDZIO-PLATH Christa body: EP responsible: False committee: ENER date: 1995-02-02T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE name: FERBER Markus body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 1994-12-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: EDN name: BLOKLAND Johannes docs: type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A4-0206/1995 date: 1995-07-26T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 1995-10-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 1995-10-11T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T4-0455/1995 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 1995-10-30T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 1994-12-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PSE name: RANDZIO-PLATH Christa
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: ENER date: 1995-02-02T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PPE name: FERBER Markus
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 1994-12-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: EDN name: BLOKLAND Johannes
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      ENVI/4/06171
      reference
      1994/2187(COS)
      title
      Economic growth and environment
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 132
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Commission strategy paper
      type
      COS - Procedure on a strategy paper (historic)
      subject