BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps
download json


1995/0092(COD) Research RTD, 4th framework-programme 1994-1998: adjustment of funding following 1995 enlargement (amend. Decision 1110/94/EC)

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ENER LINKOHR Rolf (icon: PES PES)
Former Responsible Committee ENER LINKOHR Rolf (icon: PES PES)
Former Committee Opinion BUDG MÜLLER Edith (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Former Committee Opinion CONT
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC before Amsterdam E 130I-p1/2

Events

1996/04/04
   Final act published in Official Journal
Documents
Decision 1996/616
OJ L 086 04.04.1996, p. 0069
1996/03/25
   CSL - Final act signed
1996/03/25
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
1996/03/04
   CSL - Act approved by Council, 2nd reading
Details

Following the approval by Parliament of its common position of the previous 30 November, the Council adopted the Decision amending Decision 1110/94/EC concerning the Fourth Framework Programme of Research and Technological Development (1994-1998).

1996/03/04
   CSL - Council Meeting
1996/02/01
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 2nd reading
Documents
OJ C 047 19.02.1996, p. 0011-0014
T4-0035/1996
1996/02/01
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
Documents
T4-0035/1996
1996/01/31
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Details

The rapporteur, Mr LINKHOR, welcomed the fact that the common position of the Council had taken over the main amendments drawn up by Parliament at first reading. He regretted that the administrative costs associated with the introduction of the projects were seriously diminishing the impact of the appropriations and was disappointed to see that the research share of GDP was declining throughout the European Union. Finally, the rapporteur protested about the fact that Parliament was unable to intervene in the area of nuclear research programmes. He therefore thought that the Intergovernmental Conference should institute the codecision procedure in the EURATOM Treaty. As regards the financial supplement to the Fourth Framework Programme, Commissioner CRESSON pointed out that the Commission was faced with the problem of being realistic while at the same time delivering an efficient system. Given the difficult budget conditions, and in view of the fact that the Council had reached its decision by unanimous agreement, the Commissioner thought that the allocation of ECU 700 million was far from negligible. Finally, with regard to the slow pace and administrative cost of the procedures Mrs Cresson, while expressing her desire to see the situation improved, wanted the Commission to adopt a strict approach to the management of the programmes.

Documents
Debate in Parliament
1995/12/19
   EP - Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
Documents
A4-0333/1995
OJ C 032 05.02.1996, p. 0005
1995/12/19
   EP - Vote in committee, 2nd reading
1995/12/18
   EP - Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
Documents
A4-0333/1995
1995/12/14
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading
1995/12/11
   EC - Commission communication on Council's position
Documents
EUR-Lex
SEC(1995)2117
1995/11/30
   CSL - Council position
Documents
11447/1/1995
OJ C 353 30.12.1995, p. 0046
1995/11/30
   CSL - Council Meeting
1995/11/29
   CSL - Council position published
Documents
11447/1/1995
1995/07/12
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
OJ C 249 25.09.1995, p. 0030-0045
T4-0336/1995
1995/07/12
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Documents
T4-0336/1995
1995/07/11
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Details

Mr LINKOHR (PSE, D) noted that Parliament had a power of codecision in the area of non-nuclear research, but could only be consulted on nuclear research. It was crucial to put an end to Parliament’s ‘impotence’ in this area. Following the accession of Finland, Sweden and Austria, appropriations for the RTD programme should increase by 7% over the entire programme. Moreover, research could not just be managed; it had to be stimulated. The Commissioner, Mrs CRESSON, shared the concerns about proper administration of certain Council delegations with a view to ensuring that the increase in management and personnel expenditure was considerably lower than the overall increase in the research budget and she hoped that a compromise would be reached on this point. As regards the two amendments tabled by the Committee on Energy, the Commission could take over the amendment on the allocation of the supplementary funds between the two periods covered by the framework programme as part of the annual budgetary procedure. However, it rejected the second amendment, which sought to apply the 7% increase to the additional expenditure of ECU 700 million, as it would prefer to look at this issue during the debate on additional expenditure to be held in the last quarter of the year, in accordance with the established work programme.

Documents
Debate in Parliament
1995/07/05
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Details

The ESC could not but approve these proposals, which merely implemented decisions already taken under the budgetary procedure. It noted that the proposed increase in no way implied an increase in the overall research effort. This adjustment was all the more necessary as the budget initially allocated for the implementation of the framework programme had been inadequate. Because this increase was across the board, it did not affect research priorities or the balance between the specific programmes. The ESC stressed that these proposals should not serve as a pretext for reopening a debate on this matter. It pointed out that under the Decisions on the framework programme (1994-1998), a possible extra ECU 700 million could be granted by 30 June 1996 at the latest for carrying out the framework programme, in the light of a review of its implementation to date.

Documents
CES0798/1995
OJ C 256 02.10.1995, p. 0012
1995/06/27
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
A4-0164/1995
OJ C 249 25.09.1995, p. 0004
1995/06/27
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
1995/06/26
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Documents
A4-0164/1995
1995/06/16
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
1995/06/09
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

Following from the trialogue of 29 November 1994 on adapting the financial perspective to take account of enlargement, the Commission proposed an automatic across-the-board increase of 7%. The Presidency noted that the Council - was in broad agreement on the need for an early decision based on an across-the-board increase in both programmes; - warmly welcomed the Commission’s commitment to concentrate the increase on research actions proper; any increase in administrative costs should therefore be limited and properly justified; - stressed that it was imperative that such a decision comply with the financial perspective, in particular heading 3, and not prejudice decisions to be taken later on the possible additional financing provided for in the framework programmes and due to be examined in due course.

Documents
1852
1995/06/09
   CSL - Council Meeting
1995/05/16
   EP - LINKOHR Rolf (PES) appointed as rapporteur in ENER
1995/05/16
   EP - LINKOHR Rolf (PES) appointed as rapporteur in ENER
1995/05/15
   EP - MÜLLER Edith (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
1995/04/12
   EC - Legislative proposal
Documents
EUR-Lex
COM(1995)0145
1995/04/11
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Documents
EUR-Lex
COM(1995)0145

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

2023-08-03Show (18) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0
date
1995-04-12T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/0
date
1995-05-31T00:00:00
docs
title: PE213.390
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/1
date
1995-06-27T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/1
date
1995-06-19T00:00:00
docs
title: PE213.390/AM
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/2
date
1995-07-05T00:00:00
docs
summary
The ESC could not but approve these proposals, which merely implemented decisions already taken under the budgetary procedure. It noted that the proposed increase in no way implied an increase in the overall research effort. This adjustment was all the more necessary as the budget initially allocated for the implementation of the framework programme had been inadequate. Because this increase was across the board, it did not affect research priorities or the balance between the specific programmes. The ESC stressed that these proposals should not serve as a pretext for reopening a debate on this matter. It pointed out that under the Decisions on the framework programme (1994-1998), a possible extra ECU 700 million could be granted by 30 June 1996 at the latest for carrying out the framework programme, in the light of a review of its implementation to date.
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/2
date
1995-06-23T00:00:00
docs
title: PE212.958/DEF
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/2/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:256:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:256:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/3
date
1995-06-27T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/4
date
1995-07-05T00:00:00
docs
summary
The ESC could not but approve these proposals, which merely implemented decisions already taken under the budgetary procedure. It noted that the proposed increase in no way implied an increase in the overall research effort. This adjustment was all the more necessary as the budget initially allocated for the implementation of the framework programme had been inadequate. Because this increase was across the board, it did not affect research priorities or the balance between the specific programmes. The ESC stressed that these proposals should not serve as a pretext for reopening a debate on this matter. It pointed out that under the Decisions on the framework programme (1994-1998), a possible extra ECU 700 million could be granted by 30 June 1996 at the latest for carrying out the framework programme, in the light of a review of its implementation to date.
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/6
date
1995-12-19T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs/8
date
1995-12-19T00:00:00
docs
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs/9
date
1995-12-21T00:00:00
docs
title: PE215.548
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
events/0/date
Old
1995-04-12T00:00:00
New
1995-04-11T00:00:00
events/4
date
1995-06-26T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1995-0164_EN.html title: A4-0164/1995
events/4
date
1995-06-27T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
title: A4-0164/1995
events/7/date
Old
1995-11-30T00:00:00
New
1995-11-29T00:00:00
events/10
date
1995-12-18T00:00:00
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1995-0333_EN.html title: A4-0333/1995
events/10
date
1995-12-19T00:00:00
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs
title: A4-0333/1995
2021-12-18Show (9) Changes | Timetravel
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0798)(documentyear:1995)(documentlanguage:EN)
New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0798)(documentyear:1995)(documentlanguage:EN)
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:249:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:249:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/6/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:353:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:353:SOM:EN:HTML
events/2/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/4/type
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19950711&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=19950711&type=CRE
events/6/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
events/11/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19960131&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=19960131&type=CRE
2020-01-19Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Research, Technological Development and Energy
committee
ENER
rapporteur
name: LINKOHR Rolf date: 1995-05-16T00:00:00 group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Research, Technological Development and Energy
committee
ENER
date
1995-05-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LINKOHR Rolf group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Research, Technological Development and Energy
committee
ENER
rapporteur
name: LINKOHR Rolf date: 1995-05-16T00:00:00 group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Research, Technological Development and Energy
committee
ENER
date
1995-05-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LINKOHR Rolf group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/2
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: MÜLLER Edith date: 1995-05-15T00:00:00 group: Green Group in the European Parliament abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
1995-05-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MÜLLER Edith group: Green Group in the European Parliament abbr: Verts/ALE
2019-07-06Show (17) Changes | Timetravel
activities
  • date: 1995-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1995&nu_doc=145 title: COM(1995)0145 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:51995PC0145(02):EN body: EC commission: type: Legislative proposal published
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1852 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1852*&MEET_DATE=09/06/1995 type: Debate in Council title: 1852 council: Research date: 1995-06-09T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 1995-06-16T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 1995-05-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: V name: MÜLLER Edith body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: ENER date: 1995-05-16T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: LINKOHR Rolf
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 1995-05-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: V name: MÜLLER Edith body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: ENER date: 1995-05-16T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: LINKOHR Rolf docs: type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A4-0164/1995 date: 1995-06-27T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 1995-07-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19950711&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1995-07-12T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T4-0336/1995 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1890 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11447%2F95&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Council position published title: 11447/1/1995 council: Health date: 1995-11-30T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 1995-12-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ENER date: 1995-05-16T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: LINKOHR Rolf
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ENER date: 1995-05-16T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: LINKOHR Rolf docs: type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading title: A4-0333/1995 date: 1995-12-19T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading
  • date: 1996-01-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19960131&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1996-02-01T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading title: T4-0035/1996 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1905 council: Environment date: 1996-03-04T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 1996-03-25T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 1996-03-25T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 1996-04-04T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=31996D0616 title: Decision 1996/616 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:1996:086:TOC title: OJ L 086 04.04.1996, p. 0069
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Research, Technological Development and Energy
committee
ENER
date
1995-05-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LINKOHR Rolf group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
1995-05-15T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: V name: MÜLLER Edith
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Research, Technological Development and Energy
committee
ENER
date
1995-05-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LINKOHR Rolf group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
committees/2
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
1995-05-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MÜLLER Edith group: Green Group in the European Parliament abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ENER
date
1995-05-16T00:00:00
committee_full
ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy
rapporteur
group: PSE name: LINKOHR Rolf
committees/3
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
opinion
False
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Environment meeting_id: 1905 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1905*&MEET_DATE=04/03/1996 date: 1996-03-04T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Health meeting_id: 1890 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1890*&MEET_DATE=30/11/1995 date: 1995-11-30T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Research meeting_id: 1852 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1852*&MEET_DATE=09/06/1995 date: 1995-06-09T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 1995-05-31T00:00:00 docs: title: PE213.390 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 1995-06-19T00:00:00 docs: title: PE213.390/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 1995-06-23T00:00:00 docs: title: PE212.958/DEF committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 1995-06-27T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:249:TOC title: OJ C 249 25.09.1995, p. 0004 title: A4-0164/1995 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-07-05T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0798)(documentyear:1995)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES0798/1995 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:256:TOC title: OJ C 256 02.10.1995, p. 0012 summary: The ESC could not but approve these proposals, which merely implemented decisions already taken under the budgetary procedure. It noted that the proposed increase in no way implied an increase in the overall research effort. This adjustment was all the more necessary as the budget initially allocated for the implementation of the framework programme had been inadequate. Because this increase was across the board, it did not affect research priorities or the balance between the specific programmes. The ESC stressed that these proposals should not serve as a pretext for reopening a debate on this matter. It pointed out that under the Decisions on the framework programme (1994-1998), a possible extra ECU 700 million could be granted by 30 June 1996 at the latest for carrying out the framework programme, in the light of a review of its implementation to date. type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
  • date: 1995-07-12T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:249:TOC title: OJ C 249 25.09.1995, p. 0030-0045 title: T4-0336/1995 summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-11-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11447%2F95&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 11447/1/1995 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:353:TOC title: OJ C 353 30.12.1995, p. 0046 summary: type: Council position body: CSL
  • date: 1995-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=1995&nu_doc=2117 title: EUR-Lex title: SEC(1995)2117 summary: type: Commission communication on Council's position body: EC
  • date: 1995-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1996:032:TOC title: OJ C 032 05.02.1996, p. 0005 title: A4-0333/1995 type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-12-21T00:00:00 docs: title: PE215.548 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 1996-02-01T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1996:047:TOC title: OJ C 047 19.02.1996, p. 0011-0014 title: T4-0035/1996 summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP
events
  • date: 1995-04-12T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1995&nu_doc=145 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(1995)0145 summary:
  • date: 1995-06-09T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1852*&MEET_DATE=09/06/1995 title: 1852 summary: Following from the trialogue of 29 November 1994 on adapting the financial perspective to take account of enlargement, the Commission proposed an automatic across-the-board increase of 7%. The Presidency noted that the Council - was in broad agreement on the need for an early decision based on an across-the-board increase in both programmes; - warmly welcomed the Commission’s commitment to concentrate the increase on research actions proper; any increase in administrative costs should therefore be limited and properly justified; - stressed that it was imperative that such a decision comply with the financial perspective, in particular heading 3, and not prejudice decisions to be taken later on the possible additional financing provided for in the framework programmes and due to be examined in due course.
  • date: 1995-06-16T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-06-27T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 1995-06-27T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: title: A4-0164/1995
  • date: 1995-07-11T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19950711&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament summary: Mr LINKOHR (PSE, D) noted that Parliament had a power of codecision in the area of non-nuclear research, but could only be consulted on nuclear research. It was crucial to put an end to Parliament’s ‘impotence’ in this area. Following the accession of Finland, Sweden and Austria, appropriations for the RTD programme should increase by 7% over the entire programme. Moreover, research could not just be managed; it had to be stimulated. The Commissioner, Mrs CRESSON, shared the concerns about proper administration of certain Council delegations with a view to ensuring that the increase in management and personnel expenditure was considerably lower than the overall increase in the research budget and she hoped that a compromise would be reached on this point. As regards the two amendments tabled by the Committee on Energy, the Commission could take over the amendment on the allocation of the supplementary funds between the two periods covered by the framework programme as part of the annual budgetary procedure. However, it rejected the second amendment, which sought to apply the 7% increase to the additional expenditure of ECU 700 million, as it would prefer to look at this issue during the debate on additional expenditure to be held in the last quarter of the year, in accordance with the established work programme.
  • date: 1995-07-12T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: title: T4-0336/1995 summary:
  • date: 1995-11-30T00:00:00 type: Council position published body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11447%2F95&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 11447/1/1995 summary:
  • date: 1995-12-14T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP
  • date: 1995-12-19T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 1995-12-19T00:00:00 type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading body: EP docs: title: A4-0333/1995
  • date: 1996-01-31T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19960131&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament summary: The rapporteur, Mr LINKHOR, welcomed the fact that the common position of the Council had taken over the main amendments drawn up by Parliament at first reading. He regretted that the administrative costs associated with the introduction of the projects were seriously diminishing the impact of the appropriations and was disappointed to see that the research share of GDP was declining throughout the European Union. Finally, the rapporteur protested about the fact that Parliament was unable to intervene in the area of nuclear research programmes. He therefore thought that the Intergovernmental Conference should institute the codecision procedure in the EURATOM Treaty. As regards the financial supplement to the Fourth Framework Programme, Commissioner CRESSON pointed out that the Commission was faced with the problem of being realistic while at the same time delivering an efficient system. Given the difficult budget conditions, and in view of the fact that the Council had reached its decision by unanimous agreement, the Commissioner thought that the allocation of ECU 700 million was far from negligible. Finally, with regard to the slow pace and administrative cost of the procedures Mrs Cresson, while expressing her desire to see the situation improved, wanted the Commission to adopt a strict approach to the management of the programmes.
  • date: 1996-02-01T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP docs: title: T4-0035/1996 summary:
  • date: 1996-03-04T00:00:00 type: Act approved by Council, 2nd reading body: CSL summary: Following the approval by Parliament of its common position of the previous 30 November, the Council adopted the Decision amending Decision 1110/94/EC concerning the Fourth Framework Programme of Research and Technological Development (1994-1998).
  • date: 1996-03-25T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL
  • date: 1996-03-25T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 1996-04-04T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: title: Decision 1996/616 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=31996D0616 title: OJ L 086 04.04.1996, p. 0069 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:1996:086:TOC
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ENER/4/07352
New
  • ENER/4/07352
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=31996D0616
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=31996D0616
procedure/legal_basis/0
EC before Amsterdam E 130I-p1/2
procedure/legal_basis/0
EC before Amsterdam E 130-p1/2
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.50.02 Framework programme and research programmes
New
3.50.02
Framework programme and research programmes
2015-11-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
2014-11-10Show (5) Changes
activities
  • date: 1995-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1995&nu_doc=145 celexid: CELEX:51995PC0145(02):EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(1995)0145 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission:
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1852 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1852*&MEET_DATE=09/06/1995 type: Debate in Council title: 1852 council: Research date: 1995-06-09T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 1995-06-16T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 1995-05-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: V name: MÜLLER Edith body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: ENER date: 1995-05-16T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: LINKOHR Rolf
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 1995-05-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: V name: MÜLLER Edith body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: True committee: ENER date: 1995-05-16T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: LINKOHR Rolf docs: type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A4-0164/1995 date: 1995-06-27T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 1995-07-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19950711&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1995-07-12T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T4-0336/1995 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1890 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11447%2F95&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Council position published title: 11447/1/1995 council: Health date: 1995-11-30T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 1995-12-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ENER date: 1995-05-16T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: LINKOHR Rolf
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ENER date: 1995-05-16T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: LINKOHR Rolf docs: type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading title: A4-0333/1995 date: 1995-12-19T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading
  • date: 1996-01-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19960131&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1996-02-01T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading title: T4-0035/1996 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1905 council: Environment date: 1996-03-04T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 1996-03-25T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 1996-03-25T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 1996-04-04T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=31996D0616 title: Decision 1996/616 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:1996:086:TOC title: OJ L 086 04.04.1996, p. 0069
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 1995-05-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: V name: MÜLLER Edith
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: ENER date: 1995-05-16T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: LINKOHR Rolf
links
European Commission
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ENER/4/07352
geographical_area
reference
1995/0092(COD)
instrument
Decision
legal_basis
EC before Amsterdam E 130-p1/2
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Legislation
title
Research RTD, 4th framework-programme 1994-1998: adjustment of funding following 1995 enlargement (amend. Decision 1110/94/EC)
type
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
final
subject
3.50.02 Framework programme and research programmes
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation