Activites

• 1996/12/02 Final act published in Official Journal
• 1996/11/13 Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • T4-0591/1996 summary

    In adopting the report by Mrs Ludivina GARCIA ARIAS (PSE, E) on the XXVth Annual Report on Competition Policy, Parliament reaffirmed the importance of the Commission's role as guardian of the Treaties and representative of the Union's general interest. It rejected therefore categorically the proposal made by the government of the Federal Republic of Germany to create an ad hoc body which would be exempt from any democratic control. As regards State aid, Parliament called on the Commission to oblige the Member States to meet their obligations to give notice of any plans to grant aid, and to prohibit the granting of any aid which was not compatible with the Common Market. Parliament called on the Commission to apply rigorously, even after 2002, the relevant rules concerning the allocation of State aid to the iron and steel sector and to prevent new derogations from Article 95 of the EC Treaty. Furthermore, Parliament noted with concern the growing disparities between the central and peripheral regions as regards the increase in state aid to undertakings in the wealthy regions, a trend which is not in accordance with the goal of cohesion. As regards monopolies, Parliament pointed out that the deregulation of a sector does not necessarily entail, or prevent, the privatization of the undertakings responsible for providing services of general interest. However, it took the view that if an undertaking belongs in part to the government, the management authority must be clearly separate from the authority responsible for the exercise of ownership, failing which competition could be subjected to unwanted effects. �

• 1996/11/12 Debate in Parliament
  • Debate in Parliament
• 1996/10/10 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • A4-0324/1996
• 1996/04/18 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
• 1996/04/10 Non-legislative basic document published
  • COM(1996)0126 summary

    OBJECTIVE: the aim is to take stock of European competition policy in 1995. SUBSTANCE: in its XXVth annual report, the Commission notes that European competition policy in 1995 was marked by a sharp increase in the number of cases referred to it and the number of decisions taken. The number of new cases referred to the Commission in all areas taken together (anti-trust, mergers, state aids) increased by more than one third. A significant part of this increase is due to the accession of three new Member States to the European Union, but also to the increased pressure of competition forcing European companies to cooperate in order to remain competitive. The Commission stresses that competition policy plays a vital role in creating a favourable climate for business, which is needed to ensure lasting economic growth and job creation. In particular, it is important for achieving and maintaining an internal market, in particular through the enforcement of rules ensuring that the regulatory barriers to trade are not replaced by private or other public restrictions having the same effect. Another fundamental objective of competition policy is consumer protection. With this in view, the Commission has penalized activities by companies seeking to block parallel imports and prevent consumers benefitting from price differences between Member States. For the same reason, the new regulation on car distribution ensures individual consumers the freedom to use parallel imports, while allowing the existence of structured networks to provide after-sales service. The Commission is displaying the same determination vis-à-vis companies which seek to curb access to the market for new competitors. The Commission has also continued its efforts to introduction competition to markets traditionally in the grip of monopolies (energy, public transport, telecommunications), while ensuring that the measures proposed are consistent with the fulfilment by public services of tasks of general economic interest such as providing universal service to all citizens at an affordable price. In this connection, application of the rules of competition to the information society has continued to be a priority. Significant progress has been made in introducing legislation to liberalize telecommunications services (mobile telephones from 1995, alternative networks from 1 July 1996, voice telephony on 1 January 1998). In several Member States, new entrants to the mobile telephone market are treated on an equal footing with the initial operator. However, the Commission is attempting to go further by preventing operators from concluding agreements or using practices which have the same effect as the former legal protection. That is why strategic alliances, which are increasingly frequent, can be authorized only if they do not close off national markets. The Commission has also prohibited two operations in order to protect the scope for competition by third parties in the sensitive audiovisual sector. With regard to state aid, the Commission has sought to continue its rigorous policy, allowing aid to be granted only under specific common rules to achieve priority objectives (e.g. research and development). In the air transport sector in particular state aids are seen as counter-productive and serving only to delay the necessary restructuring. In order to continue adapting European competition policy to the needs of the European economy, the Commission intends to open discussions with all parties concerned in the following sectors: cooperation with national competition authorities, a system of fines in the event of cartels, a green paper on mergers and vertical restraints on distribution, and an amendment of the rules on de minimis agreements to lighten the burden of constraints on undertakings as far as possible. �

Documents

• Non-legislative basic document published: COM(1996)0126
• Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A4-0324/1996
• Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
• Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T4-0591/1996

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)