Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | RUFFOLO Giorgio (PSE) | |
Opinion | RELA | PORTO Manuel (PPE) |
Legal Basis RoP 132
Activites
-
1998/02/02
Final act published in Official Journal
-
1998/01/13
Debate in Parliament
-
T4-0005/1998
summary
In adopting the report by Mr Giorgio RUFFOLO (PSE, I), the European Parliament expressed the view that, in the third stage of EMU, a monetary policy must be pursued aimed at moderating long-term interest rates so as to encourage an exchange rate for the euro that was not overvalued vis-à-vis the dollar. Parliament considered that, in order to maintain an exchange rate with the dollar which reflected the relations between economic fundamentals as accurately as possible, the European Central Bank should avoid interventions designed to manipulate the exchange rate for competitive purposes, but that it should, on the other hand, intervene to deal with occasional turbulence using normal monetary policy instruments. In the event of more substantial exchange rate disturbances, Parliament called for the requisite measures in response to accord with the general economic policy of the Union and to include, in addition to the competence of the Council of Ministers, the exercise of a right of initiative on the part of the Commission. It called, therefore, on the Council and the Commission to reinterpret Article 109 of the Treaty with a view to establishing more effective procedures to enable the Ecofin Council to exercise its key responsibilities for exchange rate policy. Parliament called for greater cooperation with the United States with the aim of concluding a formal agreement on an exchange rate system which would discourage speculators and promote monetary stability. To this end, it stressed the need for better representation of the Union in international fora. �
-
T4-0005/1998
summary
- 1997/10/29 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
-
1997/06/13
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
1997/04/23
Non-legislative basic document published
-
SEC(1997)0803
summary
OBJECTIVE: to provide an initial analysis of the external aspects of the introduction of the euro. SUBSTANCE: given the economic importance of the euro area - whatever its initial size - the introduction of the single currency will also have a significant impact on Member States outside this area as well as on third countries. The Commission's discussion paper presents an initial economic analysis of the likely impact of the euro on developments in the international economy and, more specifically, in the international monetary system. While the analysis outlined the main issues, it was not the intention to reach firm conclusions at this stage but rather to stimulate the debate. According to the European Commission, the introduction of the euro would have several consequences at international level: (1) the euro area: an economic entity comparable to the United States: the euro area (supposing all 15 Member States join) would have an economic and commercial clout similar to that of the US and greater than that of Japan. In 1996, the Union's share of the GDP in the OECD amounted to 38.3%, as against 32.5% for the US and 20.5% for Japan. If intra-Community trade was excluded, the European Union would account for 20.9% of world trade, as compared with 19.6% for the United States and 10.5% for Japan. As a result of monetary union, Europe would possess its own internal market of great economic and commercial importance. The euro bond market should, in fact, become one of the largest financial markets in the world; (2) less sensitivity to international exchange-rate fluctuations: European economies are very vulnerable to fluctuations in the international exchange markets because a great deal of European economic activity is based on international trade (exports account for around 30% of European GDP, against 8% for the US and 9% for Japan). After the introduction of the euro, the corresponding figure for the EU would be about 10%. European companies will therefore be less affected by exchange-rate fluctuations on the world markets; (3) a gradual fall in the international domination of the dollar: the dollar's dominant position has been gradually eroded since the early 1980s, and the introduction of the euro should accelerate this process on three levels: (a) commercial transactions: the euro will represent an attractive alternative to the dollar for trade, especially with the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the Mediterranean Basin and Africa; (b) central bank reserves: the euro should become a particularly attractive reserve currency; (c) composition of portfolios: between 1981 and 1995, European currencies' share of the world private portfolio had increased from 13% to 37%, while the dollar's share fell from 68% to approximately 40%. This trend should continue with the introduction of the euro; (4) no harsh effects on exchange rates: the document, after considering the impact of the introduction of the euro on the markets, concluded that there would be no excessive or untimely fluctuations in exchange rates. If based on sound economic principles and on an anti-inflationary, institutional framework, the euro would strengthen the stability of the international monetary system; (5) an opportunity to strengthen international macroeconomic cooperation: the introduction of the euro would present an opportunity to enhance international surveillance and coordination of economic and monetary issues with a view to ensuring more stable exchange rates. The document considered the institutional framework on which the euro's exchange rate policies would be based. It discussed, in particular, the responsibilities of the Council, the European Central Bank and the Commission in terms of the various possible forms for exchange relations between the euro and third countries' currencies. The document concluded that the current managed floating system would be maintained. It underlined, however, that certain issues had still to be resolved, particularly the way in which the euro's exchange-rate policy would be defined. The consequences of the introduction of the euro for international bodies, such as the IMF and G7, would also be looked at in detail. �
-
SEC(1997)0803
summary
Documents
- Non-legislative basic document published: SEC(1997)0803
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A4-0338/1997
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T4-0005/1998
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/4/08821New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 132
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 132
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|