Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Opinion | INST | VOGGENHUBER Johannes (V) | |
Opinion | JURI | FLORIO Luigi Andrea (PPE) | |
Lead | LIBE | BONTEMPI Rinaldo (PSE) |
Legal Basis RoP 132
Activites
-
1999/07/30
Final act published in Official Journal
-
1999/04/13
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
T4-0244/1999
summary
Adopting the report by Rinaldo Bontempi (PSE,IT) on an area of freedom, security and justice, the European Parliament calls for a common strategy to be drawn up on: - European citizenship and the fundamental rights of persons living in the Union; - full attainment of free movement of persons; - immigration and asylum; - mutual recognition of civil and criminal sentences; - administrative, judicial, customs and police cooperation and upgrading the role of Community agencies such as Europol. It states that the respect of fundamental rights must be the hall mark of the European Union. In this respect, it requests that the decision by the Presidency of the Council to draw up a Charter of fundamental rights should be analysed and that the added value which it would represent in comparison with the existing situation should be ascertained. It considers that the Commission should, as a matter of priority, present proposals on: - the setting-up of an authority to monitor the treatment of personal data in the work of the institutions ; - the legal means to be used to ensure that the activities of the institutiions under the third pillar guarantee the same level of protection in the various Member States; - access to the documents of the institutions; - combatting discrimination. The Parliament calls for a genuinely European approach to reappraise: - free movement of persons; - visa policy, immigration policy, conditions for entry and residence; - the definition of a statute for non-Community nationals legally residing in the Union and positive action to support their integration; - effective action against illegal immigration, targeting criminal networks organising trafficking in human beings; - establishment of a legal framework to enable the Union to cope effectively with a mass influx of displaced persons by creating a harmonised temporary protection regime, including the establishment of a system of humanitarian and financial solidarity between the Member States; - approximation of the conditions for receiving applicants for asylum and of legislation on procedures for conferring refugee status and forms of supplementary protection. The Parliament calls on the Council and the Commission to adopt without delay the necessary measures to ensure substantive progress in giving practical form to the area of freedom, security and justice before the forthcoming enlargement of the Union. It believes that the process of creating a European legal and judicial area must be accompanied by full parliamentary and judicial control. The report points out that everyone is entitled to be heard by an independent and impartial judge and to a fair trial governed by the principle of presumption of innocence and stresses the importance of respect for the principles of equal access to justice, protection of the rights of the defence, and equal terms in both civil and criminal proceedings. The Parliament considers that the granting of judicial assistance free of charge in cases of difficulty must be guaranteed in all judicial proceedings. It points out that the social reintegration of those who have paid their debt to society is a fundamental principle of European criminal law and stresses that the rights of victims of crime and terrorism must be protected and that an adequate system of compensation for such victims must be guaranteed. The Parliament further demands that the Union draw up a strategy to support and coordinate the actions of the Member States as regards: - crimes against humanity or linked to terrorist activity; - relations with the International Criminal Court, the extraordinary tribunals and the European Court of Human Rights; - crimes with percussions beyond the territory of one Member State, offences which affect the integrity or health of individuals, the European economy, which are committed using means which necessarily transcend national boundaries (eg. the Internet), which involve European citizens from more than one Member State or which involve organised crime. The Parliament finally demands that efforts be made to ensure that the European public is optimally informed and proposes that it should be made compulsory for judges, lawyers and public servants to receive training concerning fundamental rights, the European legal system and European comparative law.�
-
T4-0244/1999
summary
- 1999/04/12 Debate in Parliament
- 1999/03/16 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
-
1998/12/18
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
1998/12/09
Non-legislative basic document published
-
13844/1998
summary
OBJECTIVE: to present a Council and Commission action plan on ways of implementing the provisions of the Treaty of Amsterdam in relation to the establishment of an area of freedom, security and justice. CONTENT: this communication is in response to the request by the Cardiff European Council for the presentation of an action plan in this area. In the terms of the Treaty of Amsterdam, visa, asylum and immigration policies, as well as other questions linked to the free movement of people (legal cooperation in civil matters), will be transferred from the third to the first pillar of the EU, while the provisions of the new Title VI of the Treaty on European Union relating to cooperation between police forces and courts in criminal matters will continue to be covered by the third pillar. The scope of the Community procedure is therefore extended: several areas in the current third pillar are taken into the Community fold and restrictions applied to Community institutions as regards cooperation between the police and courts are lifted. In developing this action plan, the Council, as much as Commission, is departing from the principle that interinstitutional cooperation is essential for the successful implementation of an area of justice and freedom. Among other things, it presents a concrete expression of the priorities and timetable set by the Treaty of Amsterdam by making a direct link between the concepts of an area of freedom, security and justice. The action plan is composed of priority measures which are divided into two categories: those which must be implemented within 2 years following the entry into force of the Amsterdam Treaty and the actions and measures to be adopted within 5 years. The plan involves: 1) free movement of people, visas, asylum and immigration: . within 2 years: - assessment of countries where immigration originates with a view to developing an integrated approach for each country, - improvement of the Dublin Convention, - implementation of the EURODAC Convention, - reducing the length of asylum application processing procedures, - a study to determine the advantages of a single European asylum procedure, - a coherent readmission and return policy, - fixing procedures and conditions for issuing visas, including the introduction of a single visa, - drawing up an instrument on the status of legal immigrants; - effectively combatting illegal immigration ; . within 5 years: - provision of minimum standards for granting refugee status, - provision of measures excluding individuals refused a residence permit, - the right for legal immigrants to move unimpeded between Member States; . as soon as possible, in compliance with the Treaty: - defining minimum standards for granting temporary protection, - measures for achieving a balance between the efforts made by the Member States to accommodate displaced people and bearing the consequences of this acceptance. 2) legal cooperation in civil matters: - extending the principle of the European Judicial Network in criminal matters to civil procedures within 2 years, - considering the scope, in 5 years? time, for preparing a legal instrument for divorce, - improving and streamlining within 5 years the cooperation promoted between courts with a view to securing proof. 3) legal cooperation in criminal matters: . within 2 years: - completing the Convention on legal assistance in criminal matters, - effectively applying extradition agreements (still being ratified), - allowing a Member State?s legal authorities to intervene within the territory of another Member State, - approximating national laws on money counterfeiting, combatting prostitution, child pornography, drug-trafficking; . within 5 years: - extradition in proceedings in the absence of the defendant, - exchanging information on criminal records, - right of pursuit in the context of enforcing sentences, - approximating provisions for dealing with racism and xenophobia. 4) police cooperation: . as regards EUROPOL, within 2 years: - setting up a database on current investigations, - extending the remit of police cooperation to operational cooperation for combatting illegal immigration channels; . within 5 years: - introducing a cross-border crime research and documentation network, - considering EUROPOL?s access to the Schengen Information System (SIS); . as regards other aspects of police cooperation: - undertaking within 2 years a review of the procedures for allowing criminal investigation authorities in one Member State to intervene within the territory of another Member State, - allowing within 5 years the joint gathering, storing and processing of information held by special criminal investigation services for combatting suspect financial transactions.�
-
13844/1998
summary
- #2146
- 1998/12/03 Council Meeting
Documents
- Debate in Council: 2146
- Non-legislative basic document published: 13844/1998
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A4-0133/1999
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T4-0244/1999
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
LIBE/4/10622New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 132
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 132
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
525efab5b819f235f0000000New
53ba735eb819f24b330000a5 |
activities/2/committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
525efa6ab819f232b6000000New
53ba6e69b819f24b3300002f |
activities/3/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
525efab5b819f235f0000000New
53ba735eb819f24b330000a5 |
activities/3/committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
525efa6ab819f232b6000000New
53ba6e69b819f24b3300002f |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
525efab5b819f235f0000000New
53ba735eb819f24b330000a5 |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
525efa6ab819f232b6000000New
53ba6e69b819f24b3300002f |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|