activities |
-
date: 2000-11-29T00:00:00
docs:
url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2000&nu_doc=786
title: COM(2000)0786
type: Legislative proposal published
celexid: CELEX:52000PC0786:EN
body: EC
commission:
DG:
url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/
title: Justice
type: Legislative proposal published
-
date: 2001-01-15T00:00:00
body: EP
type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees:
body: EP
responsible: True
committee: LIBE
date: 2001-01-16T00:00:00
committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur:
group: PSE
name: KESSLER Margot
-
date: 2001-03-15T00:00:00
body: CSL
type: Council Meeting
council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA)
meeting_id: 2337
-
body: EP
committees:
body: EP
responsible: True
committee: LIBE
date: 2001-01-16T00:00:00
committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur:
group: PSE
name: KESSLER Margot
docs:
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-94&language=EN
type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
title: A5-0094/2001
date: 2001-03-20T00:00:00
type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
-
date: 2001-04-04T00:00:00
docs:
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20010404&type=CRE
type: Debate in Parliament
title: Debate in Parliament
body: EP
type: Debate in Parliament
-
date: 2001-04-05T00:00:00
docs:
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2001-197
type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
title: T5-0197/2001
body: EP
type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
date: 2001-06-28T00:00:00
body: CSL
type: Council Meeting
council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy
meeting_id: 2364
-
date: 2001-06-28T00:00:00
body: EP
type: End of procedure in Parliament
-
date: 2001-06-28T00:00:00
body: EP/CSL
type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
-
date: 2001-07-07T00:00:00
type: Final act published in Official Journal
docs:
url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32001D0515
title: Decision 2001/515
url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2001:186:SOM:EN:HTML
title: OJ L 186 07.07.2001, p. 0011
|
commission |
-
body: EC
dg: Justice and Consumers
commissioner: --
|
committees/0 |
- type
- Responsible Committee
- body
- EP
- associated
- False
- committee_full
- Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
- committee
- LIBE
- date
- 2001-01-16T00:00:00
- rapporteur
-
name: KESSLER Margot
group: Party of European Socialists
abbr: PES
|
committees/0 |
- body
- EP
- responsible
- True
- committee
- LIBE
- date
- 2001-01-16T00:00:00
- committee_full
- Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
- rapporteur
-
group: PSE
name: KESSLER Margot
|
council |
-
body: CSL
type: Council Meeting
council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy
meeting_id: 2364
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2364*&MEET_DATE=28/06/2001
date: 2001-06-28T00:00:00
-
body: CSL
type: Council Meeting
council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA)
meeting_id: 2337
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2337*&MEET_DATE=15/03/2001
date: 2001-03-15T00:00:00
|
docs |
-
date: 2000-11-29T00:00:00
docs:
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2000&nu_doc=786
title: EUR-Lex
title: COM(2000)0786
title: OJ C 096 27.03.2001, p. 0244 E
summary:
type: Legislative proposal
body: EC
-
date: 2001-02-26T00:00:00
docs:
title: PE294.316
type: Committee draft report
body: EP
-
date: 2001-02-27T00:00:00
docs:
title: PE300.001/DEF
committee: BUDG
type: Committee opinion
body: EP
-
date: 2001-03-15T00:00:00
docs:
title: PE294.316/AM
type: Amendments tabled in committee
body: EP
-
date: 2001-03-19T00:00:00
docs:
title: PE287.059/DEF
committee: FEMM
type: Committee opinion
body: EP
-
date: 2001-03-20T00:00:00
docs:
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-94&language=EN
title: A5-0094/2001
type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body: EP
-
date: 2001-04-05T00:00:00
docs:
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2001-197
title: T5-0197/2001
title: OJ C 021 24.01.2002, p. 0257-0329 E
summary:
type: Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body: EP
-
date: 2001-05-30T00:00:00
docs:
url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0716)(documentyear:2001)(documentlanguage:EN)
title: CES0716/2001
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2001:221:SOM:EN:HTML
title: OJ C 221 07.08.2001, p. 0103
type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body: ESC
-
date: 2001-06-13T00:00:00
docs:
url: https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0100)(documentyear:2001)(documentlanguage:EN)
title: CDR0100/2001
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2001:357:TOC
title: OJ C 357 14.12.2001, p. 0061
type: Committee of the Regions: opinion
body: CofR
-
date: 2005-04-15T00:00:00
docs:
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2005/0524/COM_SEC(2005)0524_EN.pdf
title: SEC(2005)0524
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2005&nu_doc=524
title: EUR-Lex
summary: This is a Commission prepared “Annual Report and Work-plan on the European Forum for the Prevention of Organised Crime 2004”. The Report notes that this is the fourth year of the Forum’s existence. Since then it has fulfilled its purpose as a European networking tool for those involved in crime prevention. The Forum has continued to act as a useful platform for an open debate on, and analysis of, matters relating to organised crime amongst a wide range of stakeholders at a European, national, regional and local level. In 2004 the Forum held workshops on Crime Statistics, Data Protection and Data Retention, Fiscal Fraud and Financial Crime, Cultural Goods, Trafficking in Human Beings, Terrorism and Organised Crime and Counterfeiting and Piracy. Similar workshops are planned for 2005 with topics up for discussion including, the export/import of firearms, Member State meeting on the Western Balkans, witness protection and terrorism financing using the non-profit sector.
type: Follow-up document
body: EC
-
date: 2006-03-07T00:00:00
docs:
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0333/COM_SEC(2006)0333_EN.pdf
title: SEC(2006)0333
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=333
title: EUR-Lex
summary: This Commission staff working document consists of a report on the ex post evaluation of Grotius II, Oisin II, Stop II, Falcone and Hippokrates Programmes and the interim evaluation of the AGIS Programme.
To recall, since January 2003, the five former Programmes established under Title VI (Grotius, Oisin, Stop, Falcone and Hippokrates), that ran from 1996 until 2002, were brought together into a single Programme - the AGIS Framework Programme (2003-2007).
The main objectives of this document are as follows:
to present a summary of the main results and conclusions of this evaluation; to assess the main recommendations; to present concrete proposals for the next programming period and, notably, to draw conclusions relevant to the implementation of the Programmes that are to replace the AGIS Programme.
The Commission has already presented to the Council and the European Parliament proposals for Programmes to replace the AGIS Programme (the Security Programme and, to some extent, the Justice Programme) in the next programming period. It must be underlined that the recommendations both general and specific that are discussed in this paper can be fully implemented under the new legal framework.
As regards the former Title VI Programmes, the ex post evaluation was centred on the last 2 years of implementation – 2001 and 2002. The evaluation exercise therefore focused on STOP II, Oisin II and Grotius II, which are the so-called second generation of Programmes, as well as in Hippokrates (2001/2002) and Falcone (2001/2002).
In the case of the interim evaluation of the AGIS Programme, the analysis focused on the 2 first years of implementation – 2003 and 2004 , where a majority of grant-aided projects was still ongoing.
In geographical terms, the study covered all the countries that participated in the Programme - Member States (then 15), candidate countries (now the new 10 Member States) and third countries.
The main overall conclusions of the evaluation are as follows:
the former Title VI programmes as well as the AGIS programme have been useful programmes that have made a very positive contribution to increasing knowledge, understanding and trust among target groups, which are crucial factors for increasing cross-national co-operation in the area, and ultimately to creating an area of justice, freedom and security; all programmes have led to the implementation of effective projects that in most cases would not have existed without the financial support of the programmes, or would have existed in a different format, where less focus would have been on the transnational aspects. While most stakeholders recognise the need and the benefits arising from transnational co-operation projects, there are few alternative funding opportunities that allow similar projects to take place; the transnational element is strong in most of the projects that have been implemented. It has, however, been more predominant or better integrated under the AGIS programme, as compared to the former Title VI programmes. The main explanation for this could be the strengthened requirements concerning partnerships; the programmes have led to the creation and strengthening of many formal and informal networks and this can be said to be one of their main merits. For the former Title VI programmes, it can be concluded that sustainable benefits do arise from these networks and that networks are generally found to be useful beyond the scope and lifetime of projects. the programmes were generally not found to be demand driven, in the sense that policy priorities and objectives do not determine the portfolio of projects. Objectives are broad and not clearly prioritised, allowing applicants to claim that most of their ideas match the programme objectives. Rather than being EU demand driven, most projects are thus supply driven, resulting from the specific interest of possible promoters; related to the previous point, Member States (programme committees) generally play a limited role in the formulation of specific objectives for annual work programmes, despite a specific AGIS Committee meeting every year being devoted to an examination of the annual work programme. Instead, the role of Member States’ representatives in the committees is mainly found to be as advocates for national interests in the selection of particular projects.
The report concludes that the aim of the external evaluation and, even more so, of this paper is to feed into the implementation of the remainder of the AGIS Programme as well as the new programmes after 2006. The proposals from the Commission for new programmes from 2007 are compatible with the conclusions and recommendations of this document, as the former set quite a broad legislative framework and the latter pertain more to the policy use of the programmes and their implementation mechanisms.
As concerns the specific recommendations on implementing mechanisms, there is no doubt that they have to be applied during the next programming period.
Furthermore, the selection criteria for objectives and priority areas for the funding programmes need to be defined and agreed by all involved in the management of the programme. It is clear that founding documents, such as the Hague Programme and Action Plan, provide commonly agreed overall political objectives, which then need to be translated into concrete milestones for programme implementation. It is suggested that this is an iterative process between the Commission and the relevant management structures of the programmes, once views from relevant stakeholders have been collected and integrated.
In conclusion, all-embracing programmes as they currently exist would give way to much more specific ones, with outcomes, results and eventually impacts being more systematically disseminated and monitored.
type: Follow-up document
body: EC
-
date: 2006-12-20T00:00:00
docs:
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/1798/COM_SEC(2006)1798_EN.pdf
title: SEC(2006)1798
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=1798
title: EUR-Lex
summary: This Commission Staff Working Document presents annual report for 2005 on the activities of the European Forum for the prevention of organised crime. The paper gives details of the workshops held in 2005 and provides an overview of debates in specific fields.
These are the following:
fraud and counterfeiting of non-cash means of payments : a majority of Member States reported that the investigation of non-cash payment fraud committed on-line might be handled by the computer crime or high tech crime unit; prevention of terrorist financing through the non-profit sector : meetings gave further consideration to the EU implementation of FATF Special Recommendation VIII regarding non-profit organisations, with special regard to mechanisms addressing the vulnerability of non-profit organisations to terrorist financing; European policy on the use of Passenger Name Records : many Member States indicated that there was an urgent need for common rules in the area. The main purposes should be the fight against terrorism, and organised crime, plus border controls. It is agreed that there is no need for a central point at EU-level but the creation of a network at EU-level of specialist teams dealing with PNR data could be considered; electronic evidence: the exchange of views concerned the legal framework for capturing and exchanging data which could be used as electronic evidence, the role of the judicial authorities during the collection of the data and assessment of electronic evidence at a trial. A further issue related to the safeguards which should be adopted to protect the accused person's rights and personal data; investigative tools: the Commission put forward the possibility of setting up a central platform in order to address Member States’ needs, share problems and technical solutions and participate in development projects. This structure would have a new horizontal and political approach, different from the existing structures; tackling human trafficking : key themes to emerge included the importance of addressing root causes of trafficking and further developing collaboration between government and civil society; public private partnership : there was broad agreement that Public Private Partnerships can strengthen cooperation between regulators, providers and users of services in order to enhance security; new financial programme “Prevention of and fight against crime” (2007-2013 ). The views expressed were considered as part of an ex-ante evaluation of the new financial instrument.
type: Follow-up document
body: EC
|
events |
-
date: 2000-11-29T00:00:00
type: Legislative proposal published
body: EC
docs:
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2000&nu_doc=786
title: EUR-Lex
title: COM(2000)0786
summary:
-
date: 2001-01-15T00:00:00
type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body: EP
-
date: 2001-03-20T00:00:00
type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body: EP
summary:
-
date: 2001-03-20T00:00:00
type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body: EP
docs:
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2001-94&language=EN
title: A5-0094/2001
-
date: 2001-04-04T00:00:00
type: Debate in Parliament
body: EP
docs:
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20010404&type=CRE
title: Debate in Parliament
-
date: 2001-04-05T00:00:00
type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body: EP
docs:
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2001-197
title: T5-0197/2001
summary:
-
date: 2001-06-28T00:00:00
type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
body: EP/CSL
-
date: 2001-06-28T00:00:00
type: End of procedure in Parliament
body: EP
-
date: 2001-07-07T00:00:00
type: Final act published in Official Journal
docs:
title: Decision 2001/515
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32001D0515
title: OJ L 186 07.07.2001, p. 0011
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2001:186:TOC
|
other |
-
body: CSL
type: Council Meeting
council: Former Council configuration
-
body: EC
dg:
url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/
title: Justice
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32001D0515
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32001D0515
|
procedure/subject |
Old
- 7.30.30 Action to combat crime
New
- 7.30.30
- Action to combat crime
|