Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | LIBE | ROURE Martine (PSE) |
Legal Basis RoP 050-p1, RoP 154, Treaty on the European Union (after Amsterdam) M 031, Treaty on the European Union (after Amsterdam) M 034
Activites
-
2001/11/21
Final act published in Official Journal
- #2376
- 2001/10/16 Council Meeting
-
2001/10/16
End of procedure in Parliament
-
2001/10/16
Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
-
2001/10/04
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
T5-0501/2001
summary
The European Parliament adopted the proposal without report.�
-
T5-0501/2001
summary
-
2001/10/01
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
-
2001/07/16
Formal reconsultation of Parliament
-
2001/06/29
Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published
-
10076/2001
summary
The European Parliament is again consulted on the draft Protocolto the 2000 Convention on mutual assistance in criminal matters between the Member States and of the European Union. The main provisions of the draft Protocol concern in particular: the request for information on bank accounts; requests for information on banking transactions; requests for monitoring of banking transactions; confidentiality; obligation to inform; additional requests for mutual assistance; banking secrecy; fiscal offences; political offences forwarding refusals to the Council and the involvement of Eurojust; accession of new Member States and the entry into force for Iceland and Norway.�
- DG [{'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/justice/', 'title': 'Justice'}],
-
10076/2001
summary
- #2350
-
2001/05/28
Council Meeting
- #2314
- 2000/11/30 Council Meeting
-
2000/11/14
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
T5-0498/2000
summary
The Parliament voted 444 to 20 with 85 abstentions in favour of a resolution, drafted by Mrs Martine ROURE (PES, F), endorsing an intitiative from the French Presidency which aims to step up cooperation in the legal area to ensure that no barriers are put in place to prevent the extradition of suspected criminals accused of money laundering or other related offences involving illicit funds. (Refer to the previous step in the legislative process, decisions of committee responsible). In addition, the non-binding amendments adopted seek to extend the scope of the convention to cover lawyers acting as financial consultants, taking up protection of individuals' rights and seek to oblige any Member State invoking special reasons for not cooperating to state the reasons within two months of the receipt of the request. An other amendment approved supports the setting up of a European Cooperation Unit. �
-
T5-0498/2000
summary
- 2000/11/13 Debate in Parliament
- 2000/10/24 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
- #X013
-
2000/10/17
Council Meeting
-
2000/09/04
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2000/07/19
Legislative proposal published
-
10213/2000
summary
PURPOSE: to present a French initiative with a view to adopting a Convention on improving mutual assistance in criminal matters, in particular in the area of combating organised crime, laundering of the proceeds from crime and financial crime. CONTENT: The purpose of this draft Convention is to supplement the provisions and facilitate the application between the Member States of the following instruments for cooperation governing mutual assistance between their competent authorities: - the 1959 European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal matters, - the Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Mutual Assistance, signed in 1978, - the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, established on the basis of Articles 31 and 34 of the Treaty on European Union by the Council Act of 29/05/2000 (referred to as the '2000 Convention'), - the provisions in force on mutual assistance in criminal matters of the Convention implementing the 1985 Schengen Agreement on the gradual abolition of checks at common border, - Chapter 2 of the Treaty on Extradition and Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, - the 1990 European Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime. This Convention shall not affect the application of more favourable provisions in bilateral or multilateral agreements between Member States, or arrangements in the field of mutual assistance in criminal matters agreed on the basis of uniform legislation or of a special system providing for the reciprocal application of measures of mutual assistance in their respective territories. The main matters dealt with by the draft Convention are as follows: 1) Reservations and declarations in Article 5 of the 1959 Convention: these shall not be invoked between the Member States. 2) Banking and commercial secrecy: a Member State may not invoke the provisions on confidentiality applicable to banking activities and other commercial activities in order to refuse to implement a request for mutual assistance from another Member State. 3) Traceability of the proceeds from crime: measures to be taken to encourage the provision and securing of documents, information and other data likely to constitute evidence as to the existence of proceeds of crime, their location or movement, their nature, legal status or value, and the final beneficiary. 4) Request for banking information: a Member State which receives a request for mutual assistance must provide as soon as possible the list of all types of bank accounts of which a natural personb being prosecuted or under suspicion in the requesting Member State is or was the holder or financial beneficiary. 5) Fiscal offencs: mutual assistance may not be refused solely on the grounds that the request concerns offences relating to taxes and excise duties, customs or foreign exchange. 6) Fundamental interests: with regard to prosecutions of or investigations into serious organised crime or laundering of the proceeds of crime, mutual assistance requested pursuant to the provisions of the applicable cooperation instrument may berefused only where the requested Member State considers that implementation of the request is likely to jeopardise its essential interests. Where such grounds are invoked, reasons must be provided in writing to the requesting Member State. If, however, the requesting Member State maintains its request and no solution can be found, the reasoned decision to refuse the request shall be forwarded to the Council for ,information by the requested Member State, for possible consideration in the context of a subsequent evaluation at the level of the European Union of this Convention. 7) Multidisciplinary structures: while taking account of its own constitutional structures, each Member State shall set up integrated multidisciplinary teams at national level, where they do not already exist, specifically in the are of organised crime, in particular with regard to laundering of the proceeds of crime. This Convention shall be subject to adoption by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements. It shall be open to accession by any State which becomes a member of the EU.�
- DG [{'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/justice/', 'title': 'Justice'}],
-
10213/2000
summary
Documents
- Legislative proposal published: 10213/2000
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A5-0314/2000
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T5-0498/2000
- Debate in Council: 2314
- Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published: 10076/2001
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T5-0501/2001
- Debate in Council: 2376
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|