Activites

• 2004/03/09 Final act published in Official Journal
  • Regulation 2004/422
  • OJ L 070 09.03.2004, p. 0001-0007
• #2561
• 2004/02/19 Council Meeting
• 2004/02/19 End of procedure in Parliament
• 2004/02/19 Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
• #2547
• 2003/11/26 Council Meeting
• 2003/09/23 Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • T5-0398/2003 summary

    The European Parliament adopted a resolution by 464 votes in favour, 10 against and 30 abstentions a non-binding resolution on the Community trade mark system. The rapporteur was Luis BERENGUER FUSTER (PES, Spain). (Please see the document dated 17/06/03.)�

• 2003/06/17 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • A5-0236/2003
• 2003/01/29 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
• 2002/12/27 Legislative proposal published
  • COM(2002)0767 summary

    PURPOSE : to amend certain provisions in Regulation 94/40/EC on the Community trade mark. CONTENT : The latter regulation instituted a unitary system of protection of the mark throughout the Member States via Community registration. This system has generally been satisfactory in fulfilling users' expectations. The functioning of the system has made it possible to identify other aspects which could clarify and further supplement it. The following changes are proposed: - Proprietors (Article 5): Under current provisions, proprietorship of a mark is allowed to certain persons under certain conditions. This is now changed so that the definition of proprietor is now open to any natural or legal person or authority established under public law. However, the rules on the priority of an earlier trade mark will continue to apply so as not to damage the rights of proprietors who are nationals of the Member States. - Search: The purpose of the searching system is to identify conflicts with other prior rights which might be invoked via the opposition procedure and might prevent the registration of the Community trade mark applied for. Having identified several drawbacks of the system, the proposal is to abolish the searching system. - Representation: The wording of Article 89(2)(c) has been adapted so that it suffices to be resident in any EU Member State to be able to deal with the Office. Changing one's place of residence or employment within the territory of the various Member States would no longer have any implications for one's representation at the Office. - Boards of Appeal: The following amendments are proposed: -the members of the Boards of Appeal, including the Chairmen, will be appointed by the Administrative Board and not the Council. This will make the appointment procedure more efficient. On the other hand, the removal of members will continue to be the responsibility of the Court of Justice; -a chairman of the Boards of Appeal can also take on the position of chairman of the appeals department; -a single member may take decisions where circumstances so merit; -the board of Appeal may take decisions, in certain cases, in an enlarged Board. - Points of procedure: The following amendments are proposed: -a provision has been added to the list of absolute grounds of refusal to make explicit that Regulation 2081/92 is not affected; -relative grounds for refusal concerning the proprietors of signs; -a technical amendment on insolvency proceedings; -filing of applications where the document is submitted late; -division of the application and the registration; -revision of ex parte and inter parte decisions; -revocation of decisions within six months; -the alignment of the text with regard to powers with the new Community design system; -apportionment of cost, which is set automatically; -continuation of proceedings where a party to proceedings before the Office has failed to observe a time limit; -request for conversion to be entrusted to the Office and not tothe national offices; - provisions on counterclaims, checks on legality and decisions on opposition or cancellation. Finally, certain fees have been abolished, such as those which do not provide the Office with real revenue but make the procedure considerably more cumbersome.�

  • DG [{'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/', 'title': 'Internal Market and Services'}],

Documents

• Legislative proposal published: COM(2002)0767
• Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A5-0236/2003
• Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T5-0398/2003
• : Regulation 2004/422
• : OJ L 070 09.03.2004, p. 0001-0007

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)