BETA


2003/2156(INI) Control of external borders: development of a common policy, Thessaloniki Council

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead LIBE PIRKER Hubert (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion DEVE
Committee Opinion AFET
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 52

Events

2006/07/19
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

PRUPOSE: second annual report on the development of a common policy on illegal immigration, smuggling and trafficking of human beings, external border controls and the return of illegal residents.

CONTENT: this report provides an overview of the main developments since mid-2004 in key areas linked to the fight against illegal immigration. It retains the same structure as that of the first annual report prepared in 2004.

It is accompanied by a statistical annex listing the migration flows in the EU-25, which provides information on both legal as well as illegal migration flows. Noteworthy is the scarcity of reliable statistical or other empirical data on illegal immigration. Where data does exist its coverage is limited. This Report is, therefore, unable to give an exact figure on the current stock of irregular migrants in the EU. The Commission is aware of the need for comprehensive and reliable data in the field of immigration and asylum. The proposed Regulation on Community statistics on migration and international protection , if approved, should go some way to addressing this shortcoming. (For a summary of the proposed Regulation see COD/2005/0156) .

External Border Controls

On the matter of external border controls, the Report notes that EU policies are largely co-ordinated by the “Agency for the Management of Operational Co-operation at the External Borders” (FRONTEX), which formally took up responsibility in May 2005. Its tasks are many and varied. They include: the co-ordination of Member State co-operation on the control and surveillance of external borders; offering assistance in border-guard training; carrying out risk analyses; assisting the Member States during times of increased technical operational measures and providing Member States with support in organising joint return operations. As far as the legislative aspect of external border controls is concerned, the approval of Regulation 562/2006/EC establishing a Community code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders, marked a significant departure for the EU’s external policy programme. A further development is the proposed establishment of the External Borders Fund covering the period 2007-2013. Its main objective is to help support and spread the burden of responsibility for financing an integrated external border management scheme. It also establishes financial solidarity mechanisms for controls and surveillance at external borders.

For further information and a summary of these initiatives see:

- CNS/2003/0273: On the establishment of FRONTEX.

- COD/2004/0127: On the establishment of a Community code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders.

- COD/2005/0047: Proposal for the establishment of the External Borders Fund.

Visa policy, secure travel and ID Documents

On the matter of visa policy, secure travel and ID Documents, the Report notes that the Commission, at the end of 2004, presented a proposal on the Visa Information System and the exchange of data between the Member States on short-stay visas. This Regulation, once approved, will determine the system’s objectives, the types of data to be processed, the procedures to be followed and the conditions for exchanging alphanumeric, photographic and fingerprint data, on short-stay visas. The Commission will be given the right to set up and operate the VIS at a central level. In the course of 2003 the Commission presented two proposals on a uniform format for visa and residence permits. The technical committee has since concluded that it is not feasible to integrate biometrics into each sticker due to durability challenges and interference between several chips in one passport. It has, therefore, been decided that for residence permits only card versions will be issued. As for visas, biometric identifiers will not be integrated into the sticker itself nor will there be a separate smart card. Biometric identifiers will only be stored on the Visa Information System. Thus, the proposed requirement for biometrics to be included in the visa sticker was withdrawn, whilst the proposal for inserting biometrics into residence permits was amended.

For further information and a summary of these initiatives see:

- COD/2004/0287: Proposal t o set up a common system and common procedures for the exchange of visa data between Member States.

- COD/2004/003: Regulation laying down standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by the Member States.

- COD/2003/0218: Proposal to lay down a uniform format for residence permits for third-country nationals.

Return Policy

In 2005, the Community proposed a Directive on common standards and procedures in the Member States for returning illegally staying third country nationals, otherwise known as the Return Directive. It provides common rules on the return, removal and use of coercive measures, temporary custody provisions and provisions on re-entry. The Commission also proposed a European Return Fund, the main objective of which is to strengthen an integrated Member State return management scheme. The Return Fund would help finance more effective and uniform use of common standards on return. In other developments, the Commission has been continuing negotiations for Community readmission agreements with Morocco, Pakistan, Russia and the Ukraine.

For further information and a summary of these initiatives see:

- COD/2005/0167: Proposal to provide common rules concerning return, removal, use of coercive measures, temporary custody and re-entry for illegally staying third-country nationals.

- COD/2005/0049: Proposal to establish a European Return Fund.

Human trafficking

In December 2005, an EU Plan on best practices, standards and procedures for combating and preventing Trafficking in Human Beings was adopted by the Council. This action plan covers a full range of issues, such as measures to understand the origins of the crime, how to prevent further trafficking from taking place and how to reduce demand. Other measures seek to promote efficient investigations and prosecution, measures to protect and support victims of trafficking and how to re-integrate third-country nationals once they have been returned.

Relations with Third Countries

Over the last year, the EU has further strengthened dialogue on migration issues with third countries. This dialogue has focused primarily on the root causes of migration, how to address the root causes and ways in which a migration policy can be strengthened. In the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy, a number of action plans with both Mediterranean and Eastern European countries have been agreed. These include a commitment from both sides to co-operate on migration issues and to fight illegal migration. Further the Commission helped fund a number of projects under the AENEAS programme.

Supporting measures

Supporting measures include a secure web-based Information and Co-ordination Network for Member States’ Migration Management Services (ICONet), the purpose of which is to provide a platform for the exchange of strategic, tactical and operational information concerning illegal migratory movement. In addition the “Centre for Information, Discussion and Exchange on the Crossing of Frontiers and Immigration” (CIREFI) has continued to assist the commission through monthly discussions.

2004/10/25
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

PURPOSE: First Annual Report on development of common policy regarding illegal immigration, smuggling and trafficking of human beings, external borders and the return of illegal immigrants.

CONTENT: This report is an essential part of the regular political monitoring process in the field of the development of a common policy on illegal immigration, smuggling and trafficking of human beings, external borders and the return of illegal residents. It was prepared as a contribution to the November 2004 European Council by providing an overview of progress made in the implementation of the three action plans on illegal immigration, external borders and return in the past year. The report, however, also covers some earlier measures indicated in the three action plans adopted in 2002 with special attention to those which have not been fully implemented or simply did not correspond to the initial expectations of the Council.

This report which is addressed to the Council and the European Parliament records a high number of measures that, because of their nature and the areas touched upon (e.g. external borders, visas, return, etc), are of interest to a wider public including the third country nationals themselves. Therefore this annual report also intends to respond to an increasing transparency requirement of civil society in these sensitive policy areas.

The report shows that all actors, Community institutions and Member States, have actively pursued the objectives laid down in the relevant Communications and Council action plans and conclusions. There are, however, different degrees of progress in the fields covered by the report.

The field of external borders has been the most prolific during the last year. The legislative instruments proposed by the Commission for the revision of the Schengen Acquis on the control of external borders are intended to consolidate and make more coherent the existing legal framework. This process, which will result in clearer rules and better implementation, also presents the advantage of associating for the first time fully the European Parliament with the development of this important part of the Schengen acquis that had its origin in a purely intergovernmental framework. The operational cooperation channelled through the numerous specialised centres, joint operations and pilot projects, is aimed at promoting mutual understanding and trust, and the exchange of good practices and information between national services. This cooperation is also raising the awareness about the risks and threats at the common external borders of the EU. It must be noted that the results of these activities are sometimes not as positive as expected; however, they constitute a first step in view of a much more effective common action under the single roof of the future external borders' Agency. This Agency will ensure the operational coordination and effective control of the activities that are currently lacking.

In the field of return of third country nationals there is still much work to be done. Thus, there are no harmonised conditions and procedures for the return of people staying illegally in the EU. This lack of common rules necessarily has a negative impact on the possibilities of cooperation and funding at Community level. The priority must therefore be that the EU equips itself with common rules that will also increase the mutual trust and facilitate the recognition of other Member States' return decisions. Another condition sine qua non for making possible the mutual recognition and an effective cooperation among Member States is a systematic exchange of information regarding expulsion and removal decisions. The future Commission's proposals on return and SIS II will take into account these requirements and examine the possibility of creating new categories of alerts or use the existing categories for new purposes.

However, the success of the return policy also depends heavily on the cooperation of third countries, which is directly reflected in the progress of the readmission agreements. The readmission agreements, as well as the entire migration dialogue with third countries is characterised by the need for strong coordination of the different EU policies and institutional actors that contribute to the shaping of the external relations of the EU. Such coordination leads to the necessary bundling of forces and render the EU action vis-à-vis the third countries more coherent and efficient. Thus, important progress was made in the establishment of a dialogue with third countries (neighbours and a number of countries of origin) when it comes to legal and illegal migration, also providing support for many projects aimed at better managing of migration by and in these countries. The recent Communications on readmission and links between legal and illegal immigration indicated some new actions that could be explored in this field.

The coordination of different policies is key to making progress regarding the problem of undeclared work that requires a mix of policies in the socio-economic field. The existing studies in the field and future national reports (NAPs) will help to assess the need for further action concerning undeclared work carried out by third country nationals staying illegally in the EU.

The recent developments regarding visa policy, residence permits and passports have been strongly influenced by the EU security agenda, in particular the fight against terrorism. The same applies for technological developments such as the creation or revision of large-scale IT systems for exchanging personal data and the use of biometrics. The other important objectives such as effective management of travellers, asylum seekers or migrants' flows must also be highlighted. Ultimately the development and use of these powerful technologies for the collection and exchange of personal data must be compliant with fundamental rights including data protection rules. The concerns raised in this context by the European Parliament and other organisations representing civil society must be addressed by performing careful assessment of the proportionality of the measures envisaged, and establishing clear and solid legal frameworks in order to guarantee the data subjects' rights.

The exchange of information (no personal data) and statistics will be supported by new instruments establishing a more formal framework. The objective is to increase the commitment of the Member States to deliver reliable and comparable data in a timely manner that should allow stakeholders to get a clearer picture of the illegal immigration in the EU.

In the fight against the smuggling of and trafficking in human beings the EU will continue to follow a multi-disciplinary approach covering the prevention of these crimes, the protection of the victims and the prosecution and punishment of the perpetrators. To that end the legislation adopted has to be properly implemented and evaluated. Law enforcement agencies and the judiciary should consider the crimes concerned as a priority and adequate personal and financial resources should be allocated. Specific attention must be paid to trafficking in children and related forms of exploitation.

The implementation of these policies and the cooperation between Member States should be guided by a solidarity principle that must be materialised in mechanisms that can guarantee fair burden sharing. The commitments made by the Commission in its Communication of June 2003 were respected and a total of EUR 94 millions are currently proposed or programmed until 2006 for the external borders, visa information system and return programme. Furthermore the Commission, in its July 2004 Communication on the new Financial Perspectives (2007-2013) has already referred to the management of external borders as one of the priority areas, and favours the idea of a framework programme that would also cover asylum and migration management including the fight against illegal immigration and return.

2004/01/15
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
2004/01/15
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2004/01/15
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2004/01/14
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2003/12/08
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
2003/12/08
   CSL - Council Meeting
2003/11/25
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2003/11/25
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2003/11/25
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2003/11/17
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2003/11/04
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
2003/11/04
   CSL - Council Meeting
2003/10/20
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2003/10/09
   CofR - Committee of the Regions: opinion
2003/09/04
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2003/07/10
   EP - Responsible Committee
2003/06/05
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2003/06/05
   CSL - Council Meeting
2003/06/03
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: PIRKER Hubert date: 2003-07-10T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2003-07-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PIRKER Hubert group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2003-419&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2003-0419_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-29
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2004-0029_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2004/1349/COM_SEC(2004)1349_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2004/1349/COM_SEC(2004)1349_EN.pdf
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2003/0323/COM_COM(2003)0323_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2003/0323/COM_COM(2003)0323_EN.pdf
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2003-419&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-5-2003-0419_EN.html
events/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-29
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-5-2004-0029_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2003-06-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2003/0323/COM_COM(2003)0323_EN.pdf title: COM(2003)0323 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52003DC0323:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2514 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2514*&MEET_DATE=05/06/2003 type: Debate in Council title: 2514 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 2003-06-05T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2003-09-04T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development and Cooperation committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2003-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PIRKER Hubert
  • date: 2003-11-04T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2537
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development and Cooperation committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2003-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PIRKER Hubert docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2003-419&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A5-0419/2003 date: 2003-11-25T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2003-12-08T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2552
  • date: 2004-01-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20040114&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2004-01-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-29 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0029/2004 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Justice and Consumers commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2003-07-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PIRKER Hubert group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense
committee
AFET
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense
committee
AFET
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development and Cooperation
committee
DEVE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development and Cooperation
committee
DEVE
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
LIBE
date
2003-07-10T00:00:00
committee_full
Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: PIRKER Hubert
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2552 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2552*&MEET_DATE=08/12/2003 date: 2003-12-08T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2537 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2537*&MEET_DATE=04/11/2003 date: 2003-11-04T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2514 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2514*&MEET_DATE=05/06/2003 date: 2003-06-05T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2003-10-09T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0250)(documentyear:2003)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CDR0250/2003 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2004:023:TOC title: OJ C 023 27.01.2004, p. 0033-0035 type: Committee of the Regions: opinion body: CofR
  • date: 2003-10-20T00:00:00 docs: title: PE329.920 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2003-11-17T00:00:00 docs: title: PE329.920/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2003-11-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2003-419&language=EN title: A5-0419/2003 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2004-01-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-29 title: T5-0029/2004 title: OJ C 092 16.04.2004, p. 0339-0400 E summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2004-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2004/1349/COM_SEC(2004)1349_EN.pdf title: SEC(2004)1349 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2004&nu_doc=1349 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: First Annual Report on development of common policy regarding illegal immigration, smuggling and trafficking of human beings, external borders and the return of illegal immigrants. CONTENT: This report is an essential part of the regular political monitoring process in the field of the development of a common policy on illegal immigration, smuggling and trafficking of human beings, external borders and the return of illegal residents. It was prepared as a contribution to the November 2004 European Council by providing an overview of progress made in the implementation of the three action plans on illegal immigration, external borders and return in the past year. The report, however, also covers some earlier measures indicated in the three action plans adopted in 2002 with special attention to those which have not been fully implemented or simply did not correspond to the initial expectations of the Council. This report which is addressed to the Council and the European Parliament records a high number of measures that, because of their nature and the areas touched upon (e.g. external borders, visas, return, etc), are of interest to a wider public including the third country nationals themselves. Therefore this annual report also intends to respond to an increasing transparency requirement of civil society in these sensitive policy areas. The report shows that all actors, Community institutions and Member States, have actively pursued the objectives laid down in the relevant Communications and Council action plans and conclusions. There are, however, different degrees of progress in the fields covered by the report. The field of external borders has been the most prolific during the last year. The legislative instruments proposed by the Commission for the revision of the Schengen Acquis on the control of external borders are intended to consolidate and make more coherent the existing legal framework. This process, which will result in clearer rules and better implementation, also presents the advantage of associating for the first time fully the European Parliament with the development of this important part of the Schengen acquis that had its origin in a purely intergovernmental framework. The operational cooperation channelled through the numerous specialised centres, joint operations and pilot projects, is aimed at promoting mutual understanding and trust, and the exchange of good practices and information between national services. This cooperation is also raising the awareness about the risks and threats at the common external borders of the EU. It must be noted that the results of these activities are sometimes not as positive as expected; however, they constitute a first step in view of a much more effective common action under the single roof of the future external borders' Agency. This Agency will ensure the operational coordination and effective control of the activities that are currently lacking. In the field of return of third country nationals there is still much work to be done. Thus, there are no harmonised conditions and procedures for the return of people staying illegally in the EU. This lack of common rules necessarily has a negative impact on the possibilities of cooperation and funding at Community level. The priority must therefore be that the EU equips itself with common rules that will also increase the mutual trust and facilitate the recognition of other Member States' return decisions. Another condition sine qua non for making possible the mutual recognition and an effective cooperation among Member States is a systematic exchange of information regarding expulsion and removal decisions. The future Commission's proposals on return and SIS II will take into account these requirements and examine the possibility of creating new categories of alerts or use the existing categories for new purposes. However, the success of the return policy also depends heavily on the cooperation of third countries, which is directly reflected in the progress of the readmission agreements. The readmission agreements, as well as the entire migration dialogue with third countries is characterised by the need for strong coordination of the different EU policies and institutional actors that contribute to the shaping of the external relations of the EU. Such coordination leads to the necessary bundling of forces and render the EU action vis-à-vis the third countries more coherent and efficient. Thus, important progress was made in the establishment of a dialogue with third countries (neighbours and a number of countries of origin) when it comes to legal and illegal migration, also providing support for many projects aimed at better managing of migration by and in these countries. The recent Communications on readmission and links between legal and illegal immigration indicated some new actions that could be explored in this field. The coordination of different policies is key to making progress regarding the problem of undeclared work that requires a mix of policies in the socio-economic field. The existing studies in the field and future national reports (NAPs) will help to assess the need for further action concerning undeclared work carried out by third country nationals staying illegally in the EU. The recent developments regarding visa policy, residence permits and passports have been strongly influenced by the EU security agenda, in particular the fight against terrorism. The same applies for technological developments such as the creation or revision of large-scale IT systems for exchanging personal data and the use of biometrics. The other important objectives such as effective management of travellers, asylum seekers or migrants' flows must also be highlighted. Ultimately the development and use of these powerful technologies for the collection and exchange of personal data must be compliant with fundamental rights including data protection rules. The concerns raised in this context by the European Parliament and other organisations representing civil society must be addressed by performing careful assessment of the proportionality of the measures envisaged, and establishing clear and solid legal frameworks in order to guarantee the data subjects' rights. The exchange of information (no personal data) and statistics will be supported by new instruments establishing a more formal framework. The objective is to increase the commitment of the Member States to deliver reliable and comparable data in a timely manner that should allow stakeholders to get a clearer picture of the illegal immigration in the EU. In the fight against the smuggling of and trafficking in human beings the EU will continue to follow a multi-disciplinary approach covering the prevention of these crimes, the protection of the victims and the prosecution and punishment of the perpetrators. To that end the legislation adopted has to be properly implemented and evaluated. Law enforcement agencies and the judiciary should consider the crimes concerned as a priority and adequate personal and financial resources should be allocated. Specific attention must be paid to trafficking in children and related forms of exploitation. The implementation of these policies and the cooperation between Member States should be guided by a solidarity principle that must be materialised in mechanisms that can guarantee fair burden sharing. The commitments made by the Commission in its Communication of June 2003 were respected and a total of EUR 94 millions are currently proposed or programmed until 2006 for the external borders, visa information system and return programme. Furthermore the Commission, in its July 2004 Communication on the new Financial Perspectives (2007-2013) has already referred to the management of external borders as one of the priority areas, and favours the idea of a framework programme that would also cover asylum and migration management including the fight against illegal immigration and return. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2006-07-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/1010/COM_SEC(2006)1010_EN.pdf title: SEC(2006)1010 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=1010 title: EUR-Lex summary: PRUPOSE: second annual report on the development of a common policy on illegal immigration, smuggling and trafficking of human beings, external border controls and the return of illegal residents. CONTENT: this report provides an overview of the main developments since mid-2004 in key areas linked to the fight against illegal immigration. It retains the same structure as that of the first annual report prepared in 2004. It is accompanied by a statistical annex listing the migration flows in the EU-25, which provides information on both legal as well as illegal migration flows. Noteworthy is the scarcity of reliable statistical or other empirical data on illegal immigration. Where data does exist its coverage is limited. This Report is, therefore, unable to give an exact figure on the current stock of irregular migrants in the EU. The Commission is aware of the need for comprehensive and reliable data in the field of immigration and asylum. The proposed Regulation on Community statistics on migration and international protection , if approved, should go some way to addressing this shortcoming. (For a summary of the proposed Regulation see COD/2005/0156) . External Border Controls On the matter of external border controls, the Report notes that EU policies are largely co-ordinated by the “Agency for the Management of Operational Co-operation at the External Borders” (FRONTEX), which formally took up responsibility in May 2005. Its tasks are many and varied. They include: the co-ordination of Member State co-operation on the control and surveillance of external borders; offering assistance in border-guard training; carrying out risk analyses; assisting the Member States during times of increased technical operational measures and providing Member States with support in organising joint return operations. As far as the legislative aspect of external border controls is concerned, the approval of Regulation 562/2006/EC establishing a Community code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders, marked a significant departure for the EU’s external policy programme. A further development is the proposed establishment of the External Borders Fund covering the period 2007-2013. Its main objective is to help support and spread the burden of responsibility for financing an integrated external border management scheme. It also establishes financial solidarity mechanisms for controls and surveillance at external borders. For further information and a summary of these initiatives see: - CNS/2003/0273: On the establishment of FRONTEX. - COD/2004/0127: On the establishment of a Community code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders. - COD/2005/0047: Proposal for the establishment of the External Borders Fund. Visa policy, secure travel and ID Documents On the matter of visa policy, secure travel and ID Documents, the Report notes that the Commission, at the end of 2004, presented a proposal on the Visa Information System and the exchange of data between the Member States on short-stay visas. This Regulation, once approved, will determine the system’s objectives, the types of data to be processed, the procedures to be followed and the conditions for exchanging alphanumeric, photographic and fingerprint data, on short-stay visas. The Commission will be given the right to set up and operate the VIS at a central level. In the course of 2003 the Commission presented two proposals on a uniform format for visa and residence permits. The technical committee has since concluded that it is not feasible to integrate biometrics into each sticker due to durability challenges and interference between several chips in one passport. It has, therefore, been decided that for residence permits only card versions will be issued. As for visas, biometric identifiers will not be integrated into the sticker itself nor will there be a separate smart card. Biometric identifiers will only be stored on the Visa Information System. Thus, the proposed requirement for biometrics to be included in the visa sticker was withdrawn, whilst the proposal for inserting biometrics into residence permits was amended. For further information and a summary of these initiatives see: - COD/2004/0287: Proposal t o set up a common system and common procedures for the exchange of visa data between Member States. - COD/2004/003: Regulation laying down standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by the Member States. - COD/2003/0218: Proposal to lay down a uniform format for residence permits for third-country nationals. Return Policy In 2005, the Community proposed a Directive on common standards and procedures in the Member States for returning illegally staying third country nationals, otherwise known as the Return Directive. It provides common rules on the return, removal and use of coercive measures, temporary custody provisions and provisions on re-entry. The Commission also proposed a European Return Fund, the main objective of which is to strengthen an integrated Member State return management scheme. The Return Fund would help finance more effective and uniform use of common standards on return. In other developments, the Commission has been continuing negotiations for Community readmission agreements with Morocco, Pakistan, Russia and the Ukraine. For further information and a summary of these initiatives see: - COD/2005/0167: Proposal to provide common rules concerning return, removal, use of coercive measures, temporary custody and re-entry for illegally staying third-country nationals. - COD/2005/0049: Proposal to establish a European Return Fund. Human trafficking In December 2005, an EU Plan on best practices, standards and procedures for combating and preventing Trafficking in Human Beings was adopted by the Council. This action plan covers a full range of issues, such as measures to understand the origins of the crime, how to prevent further trafficking from taking place and how to reduce demand. Other measures seek to promote efficient investigations and prosecution, measures to protect and support victims of trafficking and how to re-integrate third-country nationals once they have been returned. Relations with Third Countries Over the last year, the EU has further strengthened dialogue on migration issues with third countries. This dialogue has focused primarily on the root causes of migration, how to address the root causes and ways in which a migration policy can be strengthened. In the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy, a number of action plans with both Mediterranean and Eastern European countries have been agreed. These include a commitment from both sides to co-operate on migration issues and to fight illegal migration. Further the Commission helped fund a number of projects under the AENEAS programme. Supporting measures Supporting measures include a secure web-based Information and Co-ordination Network for Member States’ Migration Management Services (ICONet), the purpose of which is to provide a platform for the exchange of strategic, tactical and operational information concerning illegal migratory movement. In addition the “Centre for Information, Discussion and Exchange on the Crossing of Frontiers and Immigration” (CIREFI) has continued to assist the commission through monthly discussions. type: Follow-up document body: EC
events
  • date: 2003-06-03T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2003/0323/COM_COM(2003)0323_EN.pdf title: COM(2003)0323 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2003&nu_doc=323 title: EUR-Lex summary:
  • date: 2003-06-05T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2514*&MEET_DATE=05/06/2003 title: 2514
  • date: 2003-09-04T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2003-11-04T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL
  • date: 2003-11-25T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 2003-11-25T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2003-419&language=EN title: A5-0419/2003
  • date: 2003-12-08T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL
  • date: 2004-01-14T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20040114&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2004-01-15T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-29 title: T5-0029/2004 summary:
  • date: 2004-01-15T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
LIBE/5/19863
New
  • LIBE/5/19863
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 7.10.04 External borders crossing and controls, visas
  • 7.10.08 Migration policy
  • 7.30.30 Action to combat crime
New
7.10.04
External borders crossing and controls, visas
7.10.08
Migration policy
7.30.30
Action to combat crime
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2003/0323/COM_COM(2003)0323_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2003/0323/COM_COM(2003)0323_EN.pdf
activities
  • date: 2003-06-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2003/0323/COM_COM(2003)0323_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52003DC0323:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2003)0323 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2514 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2514*&MEET_DATE=05/06/2003 type: Debate in Council title: 2514 council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) date: 2003-06-05T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2003-09-04T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development and Cooperation committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2003-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PIRKER Hubert
  • date: 2003-11-04T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2537
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development and Cooperation committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2003-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PIRKER Hubert docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2003-419&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A5-0419/2003 date: 2003-11-25T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2003-12-08T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2552
  • date: 2004-01-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20040114&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2004-01-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-29 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0029/2004 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security, Defense committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development and Cooperation committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2003-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: PIRKER Hubert
links
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
LIBE/5/19863
reference
2003/2156(INI)
title
Control of external borders: development of a common policy, Thessaloniki Council
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject