Progress: Procedure completed
Legal Basis:
RoP 136-p5Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution by 441 votes in favour, 15 against with 14 abstentions, calling on Member States to adopt a moratorium on the deployment of high-intensity active naval sonars until a global assessment of their cumulative environmental impact on marine mammals, fish and other marine life has been completed. It also wants the Commission to conduct a study and to provide an assessment of the impact of current practices in European waters.
Parliament pointed out that there is a growing body of research confirming that the very loud sounds produced by high-intensity active naval sonars pose a significant threat to marine mammals, fish and other ocean wildlife. In addition, the International Whaling Commission identified anthropogenic noise as a priority topic for investigation within its Scientific Committee, which concluded that there is now compelling evidence implicating military sonars as having a direct impact on whales, in particular on beaked whales. The Scientific Committee also agreed that evidence of increased sounds from other sources, including ships and seismic activities, was cause for serious concern. The EU is committed to halting biodiversity loss by its internal policies and commitment to many Conventions. With a view to effective compliance with these obligations, the nature of the risks involved requires that the precautionary approach, as enshrined in the EC Treaty, be applied, i.e. if scientific doubts exist, action which might harm biodiversity and wildlife must be avoided.
Parliament called on Member States to do the following:
- actively pursue, in the framework of NATO and other international organisations, the adoption of moratoriums and restrictions on the use of high-intensity active sonars in naval operations and the development of alternative technologies;
- immediately restrict the use of high-intensity active naval sonars in waters falling under their jurisdiction;
- investigate in a transparent manner mass strandings and deaths of marine mammals in EU waters which are associated with the use of intense anthropogenic noise;
- set up a Multinational Task Force to develop international agreements regulating noise levels in the world's oceans, with a view to regulating and limiting the adverse impact of anthropogenic sonars on marine mammals and fish.
Parliament considered that any measures to introduce common standards and cooperation in the defence industry field must exclude and actively seek alternatives to technologies which are likely to cause unnecessary and serious damage to the environment and other Community interests.
The European Parliament adopted a resolution by 441 votes in favour, 15 against with 14 abstentions, calling on Member States to adopt a moratorium on the deployment of high-intensity active naval sonars until a global assessment of their cumulative environmental impact on marine mammals, fish and other marine life has been completed. It also wants the Commission to conduct a study and to provide an assessment of the impact of current practices in European waters.
Parliament pointed out that there is a growing body of research confirming that the very loud sounds produced by high-intensity active naval sonars pose a significant threat to marine mammals, fish and other ocean wildlife. In addition, the International Whaling Commission identified anthropogenic noise as a priority topic for investigation within its Scientific Committee, which concluded that there is now compelling evidence implicating military sonars as having a direct impact on whales, in particular on beaked whales. The Scientific Committee also agreed that evidence of increased sounds from other sources, including ships and seismic activities, was cause for serious concern. The EU is committed to halting biodiversity loss by its internal policies and commitment to many Conventions. With a view to effective compliance with these obligations, the nature of the risks involved requires that the precautionary approach, as enshrined in the EC Treaty, be applied, i.e. if scientific doubts exist, action which might harm biodiversity and wildlife must be avoided.
Parliament called on Member States to do the following:
- actively pursue, in the framework of NATO and other international organisations, the adoption of moratoriums and restrictions on the use of high-intensity active sonars in naval operations and the development of alternative technologies;
- immediately restrict the use of high-intensity active naval sonars in waters falling under their jurisdiction;
- investigate in a transparent manner mass strandings and deaths of marine mammals in EU waters which are associated with the use of intense anthropogenic noise;
- set up a Multinational Task Force to develop international agreements regulating noise levels in the world's oceans, with a view to regulating and limiting the adverse impact of anthropogenic sonars on marine mammals and fish.
Parliament considered that any measures to introduce common standards and cooperation in the defence industry field must exclude and actively seek alternatives to technologies which are likely to cause unnecessary and serious damage to the environment and other Community interests.
Documents
- Motion for a resolution: B6-0089/2004
- Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects: T6-0047/2004
- Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects: OJ C 174 14.07.2005, p. 0065-0186 E
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0047/2004
- Oral question/interpellation by Parliament: B6-0018/2004
- Oral question/interpellation by Parliament: B6-0018/2004
- Motion for a resolution: B6-0089/2004
- Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects: T6-0047/2004 OJ C 174 14.07.2005, p. 0065-0186 E
Votes
B6-0089/2004- sonars navals - am.1 #
PL | SK | IE | HU | EL | SI | LV | LU | IT | MT | DE | CZ | CY | EE | LT | SE | FI | GB | AT | PT | BE | NL | DK | ES | FR | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
41
|
12
|
11
|
18
|
21
|
5
|
5
|
5
|
24
|
4
|
75
|
9
|
5
|
2
|
9
|
15
|
13
|
49
|
12
|
19
|
18
|
22
|
10
|
25
|
51
|
|
PPE-DE |
181
|
Poland PPE-DEFor (15)Barbara KUDRYCKA, Bogusław SONIK, Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Filip KACZMAREK, Jacek PROTASIEWICZ, Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI, Jan OLBRYCHT, Janusz LEWANDOWSKI, Jerzy BUZEK, Paweł Bartłomiej PISKORSKI, Stanisław JAŁOWIECKI, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA, Zbigniew KUŹMIUK, Zdzisław Kazimierz CHMIELEWSKI, Zdzisław Zbigniew PODKAŃSKI
Against (1) |
Slovakia PPE-DEFor (8) |
4
|
Hungary PPE-DEFor (10)Against (1) |
11
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
Italy PPE-DEFor (9) |
2
|
Germany PPE-DEFor (37)Albert DESS, Alexander RADWAN, Alfred GOMOLKA, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Anja WEISGERBER, Armin LASCHET, Bernd POSSELT, Christa KLASS, Christoph KONRAD, Daniel CASPARY, Doris PACK, Elisabeth JEGGLE, Elmar BROK, Hans-Gert PÖTTERING, Hans-Peter MAYER, Hartmut NASSAUER, Herbert REUL, Horst SCHNELLHARDT, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Ingo SCHMITT, Jürgen SCHRÖDER, Karl von WOGAU, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Karsten Friedrich HOPPENSTEDT, Kurt Joachim LAUK, Lutz GOEPEL, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Rainer WIELAND, Renate SOMMER, Rolf BEREND, Ruth HIERONYMI, Thomas MANN, Thomas ULMER, Werner LANGEN
Against (1) |
4
|
2
|
2
|
Sweden PPE-DE |
4
|
United Kingdom PPE-DEFor (17)Against (1) |
3
|
Portugal PPE-DEFor (6) |
Belgium PPE-DE |
Netherlands PPE-DEAgainst (1)Abstain (1) |
12
|
|||
UEN |
15
|
Poland UENFor (6) |
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
NI |
18
|
Poland NIAgainst (1) |
3
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||||
IND/DEM |
22
|
Poland IND/DEMFor (8) |
1
|
1
|
2
|
United Kingdom IND/DEMAgainst (6) |
2
|
1
|
1
|
|||||||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
28
|
1
|
Greece GUE/NGLAgainst (1)Abstain (3) |
2
|
Germany GUE/NGLAgainst (6) |
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
30
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Germany Verts/ALEAgainst (10) |
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
France Verts/ALEAgainst (5) |
|||||||||||||
ALDE |
57
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
Germany ALDEAgainst (6) |
1
|
Lithuania ALDEAgainst (5) |
2
|
Finland ALDEAgainst (5) |
United Kingdom ALDEAgainst (8) |
Belgium ALDEAgainst (5) |
3
|
4
|
2
|
France ALDEAgainst (7) |
|||||||||
PSE |
129
|
Poland PSEAgainst (4) |
1
|
1
|
Hungary PSEAgainst (6) |
Greece PSEAgainst (6) |
1
|
2
|
2
|
Germany PSEAgainst (15) |
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
United Kingdom PSEAgainst (2) |
Austria PSEAgainst (6) |
Portugal PSEAgainst (11) |
Belgium PSEAgainst (6) |
Netherlands PSEAgainst (7) |
3
|
Spain PSEFor (1)Against (15)
Alejandro CERCAS,
Antolín SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO,
Emilio MENÉNDEZ del VALLE,
Francisca PLEGUEZUELOS AGUILAR,
Inés AYALA SENDER,
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ,
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ,
Joan CALABUIG RULL,
Luis YÁÑEZ-BARNUEVO GARCÍA,
Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA,
Maria BADIA i CUTCHET,
Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ,
Rosa DÍEZ GONZÁLEZ,
Rosa MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS,
Teresa RIERA MADURELL
|
France PSEAgainst (22)
Adeline HAZAN,
André LAIGNEL,
Anne FERREIRA,
Benoît HAMON,
Bernard POIGNANT,
Catherine GUY-QUINT,
Catherine TRAUTMANN,
Françoise CASTEX,
Guy BONO,
Harlem DÉSIR,
Henri WEBER,
Jean Louis COTTIGNY,
Jean-Claude FRUTEAU,
Kader ARIF,
Marie-Arlette CARLOTTI,
Marie-Line REYNAUD,
Marie-Noëlle LIENEMANN,
Martine ROURE,
Pervenche BERÈS,
Pierre MOSCOVICI,
Pierre SCHAPIRA,
Stéphane LE FOLL
|
B6-0089/2004 - sonars navals - résolution #
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2004-0018_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2004-0018_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2004-0089_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2004-0089_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2004-0047_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2004-0047_EN.html |
events/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20041028&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20041028&type=CRE |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 136-p5
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 128-p5
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2004-18&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2004-0018_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2004-89&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2004-0089_EN.html |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2004-47New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2004-0047_EN.html |
activities |
|
committees |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 128-p5
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/subtype |
Old
Debate or resolution on oral questionsNew
Debate or resolution on oral question/interpellation |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|