BETA


2004/2566(RSP) Resolution on the environmental effects of high-intensity active naval sonars

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:
RoP 136-p5

Events

2004/10/28
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2004/10/28
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution by 441 votes in favour, 15 against with 14 abstentions, calling on Member States to adopt a moratorium on the deployment of high-intensity active naval sonars until a global assessment of their cumulative environmental impact on marine mammals, fish and other marine life has been completed. It also wants the Commission to conduct a study and to provide an assessment of the impact of current practices in European waters.

Parliament pointed out that there is a growing body of research confirming that the very loud sounds produced by high-intensity active naval sonars pose a significant threat to marine mammals, fish and other ocean wildlife. In addition, the International Whaling Commission identified anthropogenic noise as a priority topic for investigation within its Scientific Committee, which concluded that there is now compelling evidence implicating military sonars as having a direct impact on whales, in particular on beaked whales. The Scientific Committee also agreed that evidence of increased sounds from other sources, including ships and seismic activities, was cause for serious concern. The EU is committed to halting biodiversity loss by its internal policies and commitment to many Conventions. With a view to effective compliance with these obligations, the nature of the risks involved requires that the precautionary approach, as enshrined in the EC Treaty, be applied, i.e. if scientific doubts exist, action which might harm biodiversity and wildlife must be avoided.

Parliament called on Member States to do the following:

- actively pursue, in the framework of NATO and other international organisations, the adoption of moratoriums and restrictions on the use of high-intensity active sonars in naval operations and the development of alternative technologies;

- immediately restrict the use of high-intensity active naval sonars in waters falling under their jurisdiction;

- investigate in a transparent manner mass strandings and deaths of marine mammals in EU waters which are associated with the use of intense anthropogenic noise;

- set up a Multinational Task Force to develop international agreements regulating noise levels in the world's oceans, with a view to regulating and limiting the adverse impact of anthropogenic sonars on marine mammals and fish.

Parliament considered that any measures to introduce common standards and cooperation in the defence industry field must exclude and actively seek alternatives to technologies which are likely to cause unnecessary and serious damage to the environment and other Community interests.

2004/10/28
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2004/10/28
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2004/10/28
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution by 441 votes in favour, 15 against with 14 abstentions, calling on Member States to adopt a moratorium on the deployment of high-intensity active naval sonars until a global assessment of their cumulative environmental impact on marine mammals, fish and other marine life has been completed. It also wants the Commission to conduct a study and to provide an assessment of the impact of current practices in European waters.

Parliament pointed out that there is a growing body of research confirming that the very loud sounds produced by high-intensity active naval sonars pose a significant threat to marine mammals, fish and other ocean wildlife. In addition, the International Whaling Commission identified anthropogenic noise as a priority topic for investigation within its Scientific Committee, which concluded that there is now compelling evidence implicating military sonars as having a direct impact on whales, in particular on beaked whales. The Scientific Committee also agreed that evidence of increased sounds from other sources, including ships and seismic activities, was cause for serious concern. The EU is committed to halting biodiversity loss by its internal policies and commitment to many Conventions. With a view to effective compliance with these obligations, the nature of the risks involved requires that the precautionary approach, as enshrined in the EC Treaty, be applied, i.e. if scientific doubts exist, action which might harm biodiversity and wildlife must be avoided.

Parliament called on Member States to do the following:

- actively pursue, in the framework of NATO and other international organisations, the adoption of moratoriums and restrictions on the use of high-intensity active sonars in naval operations and the development of alternative technologies;

- immediately restrict the use of high-intensity active naval sonars in waters falling under their jurisdiction;

- investigate in a transparent manner mass strandings and deaths of marine mammals in EU waters which are associated with the use of intense anthropogenic noise;

- set up a Multinational Task Force to develop international agreements regulating noise levels in the world's oceans, with a view to regulating and limiting the adverse impact of anthropogenic sonars on marine mammals and fish.

Parliament considered that any measures to introduce common standards and cooperation in the defence industry field must exclude and actively seek alternatives to technologies which are likely to cause unnecessary and serious damage to the environment and other Community interests.

Documents
2004/10/28
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2004/10/25
   EP - Oral question/interpellation by Parliament
Documents

Documents

Votes

B6-0089/2004- sonars navals - am.1 #

2004/10/28 Outcome: -: 259, +: 206, 0: 15
PL SK IE HU EL SI LV LU IT MT DE CZ CY EE LT SE FI GB AT PT BE NL DK ES FR
Total
41
12
11
18
21
5
5
5
24
4
75
9
5
2
9
15
13
49
12
19
18
22
10
25
51
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
181

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
2

Austria PPE-DE

3
icon: UEN UEN
15

Ireland UEN

Against (1)

4

Latvia UEN

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
18

Slovakia NI

For (1)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
22

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (2)

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
28

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
30

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Poland ALDE

2

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Italy ALDE

3

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Netherlands ALDE

3
2
icon: PSE PSE
129

Slovakia PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Italy PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (2)

2

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PSE

3

Finland PSE

2

Denmark PSE

3

B6-0089/2004 - sonars navals - résolution #

2004/10/28 Outcome: +: 441, -: 15, 0: 14
DE FR PL GB ES NL IT HU PT EL BE SE FI AT IE SK LT DK CZ LV SI CY LU MT EE
Total
71
52
40
46
26
22
25
18
19
20
15
14
12
13
11
12
9
8
11
5
5
5
5
4
2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
175
2

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
131

Finland PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovakia PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Denmark PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

2

Estonia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
53

Netherlands ALDE

3

Hungary ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
30

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
27

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: UEN UEN
13

Italy UEN

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Latvia UEN

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
23

France IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Abstain (2)

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
18

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2004-0018_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2004-0018_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2004-0089_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2004-0089_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2004-0047_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2004-0047_EN.html
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20041028&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20041028&type=CRE
events/2
date
2004-10-28T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2004-0047_EN.html title: T6-0047/2004
summary
events/2
date
2004-10-28T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2004-0047_EN.html title: T6-0047/2004
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 136-p5
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 128-p5
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2004-18&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2004-0018_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2004-89&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2004-0089_EN.html
docs/2
date
2004-10-28T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects
body
EP
docs/2
date
2004-10-28T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects
body
EP
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2004-47
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2004-0047_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2004-10-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=11521&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20041028&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2004-47 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0047/2004 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
    docs
    • date: 2004-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2004-18&language=EN title: B6-0018/2004 type: Oral question/interpellation by Parliament body: EP
    • date: 2004-10-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2004-89&language=EN title: B6-0089/2004 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2004-10-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2004-47 title: T6-0047/2004 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:174E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 174 14.07.2005, p. 0065-0186 E summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution by 441 votes in favour, 15 against with 14 abstentions, calling on Member States to adopt a moratorium on the deployment of high-intensity active naval sonars until a global assessment of their cumulative environmental impact on marine mammals, fish and other marine life has been completed. It also wants the Commission to conduct a study and to provide an assessment of the impact of current practices in European waters. Parliament pointed out that there is a growing body of research confirming that the very loud sounds produced by high-intensity active naval sonars pose a significant threat to marine mammals, fish and other ocean wildlife. In addition, the International Whaling Commission identified anthropogenic noise as a priority topic for investigation within its Scientific Committee, which concluded that there is now compelling evidence implicating military sonars as having a direct impact on whales, in particular on beaked whales. The Scientific Committee also agreed that evidence of increased sounds from other sources, including ships and seismic activities, was cause for serious concern. The EU is committed to halting biodiversity loss by its internal policies and commitment to many Conventions. With a view to effective compliance with these obligations, the nature of the risks involved requires that the precautionary approach, as enshrined in the EC Treaty, be applied, i.e. if scientific doubts exist, action which might harm biodiversity and wildlife must be avoided. Parliament called on Member States to do the following: - actively pursue, in the framework of NATO and other international organisations, the adoption of moratoriums and restrictions on the use of high-intensity active sonars in naval operations and the development of alternative technologies; - immediately restrict the use of high-intensity active naval sonars in waters falling under their jurisdiction; - investigate in a transparent manner mass strandings and deaths of marine mammals in EU waters which are associated with the use of intense anthropogenic noise; - set up a Multinational Task Force to develop international agreements regulating noise levels in the world's oceans, with a view to regulating and limiting the adverse impact of anthropogenic sonars on marine mammals and fish. Parliament considered that any measures to introduce common standards and cooperation in the defence industry field must exclude and actively seek alternatives to technologies which are likely to cause unnecessary and serious damage to the environment and other Community interests. type: Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects body: EP
    events
    • date: 2004-10-28T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=11521&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2004-10-28T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20041028&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2004-10-28T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2004-47 title: T6-0047/2004 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution by 441 votes in favour, 15 against with 14 abstentions, calling on Member States to adopt a moratorium on the deployment of high-intensity active naval sonars until a global assessment of their cumulative environmental impact on marine mammals, fish and other marine life has been completed. It also wants the Commission to conduct a study and to provide an assessment of the impact of current practices in European waters. Parliament pointed out that there is a growing body of research confirming that the very loud sounds produced by high-intensity active naval sonars pose a significant threat to marine mammals, fish and other ocean wildlife. In addition, the International Whaling Commission identified anthropogenic noise as a priority topic for investigation within its Scientific Committee, which concluded that there is now compelling evidence implicating military sonars as having a direct impact on whales, in particular on beaked whales. The Scientific Committee also agreed that evidence of increased sounds from other sources, including ships and seismic activities, was cause for serious concern. The EU is committed to halting biodiversity loss by its internal policies and commitment to many Conventions. With a view to effective compliance with these obligations, the nature of the risks involved requires that the precautionary approach, as enshrined in the EC Treaty, be applied, i.e. if scientific doubts exist, action which might harm biodiversity and wildlife must be avoided. Parliament called on Member States to do the following: - actively pursue, in the framework of NATO and other international organisations, the adoption of moratoriums and restrictions on the use of high-intensity active sonars in naval operations and the development of alternative technologies; - immediately restrict the use of high-intensity active naval sonars in waters falling under their jurisdiction; - investigate in a transparent manner mass strandings and deaths of marine mammals in EU waters which are associated with the use of intense anthropogenic noise; - set up a Multinational Task Force to develop international agreements regulating noise levels in the world's oceans, with a view to regulating and limiting the adverse impact of anthropogenic sonars on marine mammals and fish. Parliament considered that any measures to introduce common standards and cooperation in the defence industry field must exclude and actively seek alternatives to technologies which are likely to cause unnecessary and serious damage to the environment and other Community interests.
    • date: 2004-10-28T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
      procedure/legal_basis/0
      Rules of Procedure EP 128-p5
      procedure/legal_basis/0
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
      procedure/subject
      Old
      • 3.15.01 Fish stocks, conservation of fishery resources
      • 3.70.07 Noise pollution
      New
      3.15.01
      Fish stocks, conservation of fishery resources
      3.70.07
      Noise pollution
      procedure/subtype
      Old
      Debate or resolution on oral questions
      New
      Debate or resolution on oral question/interpellation
      activities
      • date: 2004-10-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=11521&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20041028&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2004-47 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0047/2004 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
      committees
        links
        other
          procedure
          reference
          2004/2566(RSP)
          title
          Resolution on the environmental effects of high-intensity active naval sonars
          legal_basis
          Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
          stage_reached
          Procedure completed
          subtype
          Debate or resolution on oral questions
          type
          RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
          subject