Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Opinion | AFET | BEER Angelika (Verts/ALE) | |
Lead | IMCO | WUERMELING Joachim (PPE-DE) | |
Opinion | ITRE | HÖKMARK Gunnar (PPE-DE) |
Legal Basis RoP 052
Activites
-
2005/11/17
Results of vote in Parliament
- Results of vote in Parliament
-
T6-0440/2005
summary
The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on own-initiative report by Joachim WUERMELING (EPP-ED, DE) on the Green Paper on defence procurement. (Please see the document dated 05/10/2005.) The report commanded a majority of 392 members against 77, with 7 members abstaining. Parliament began by pointing out that the hermetic segregation of armaments markets is also the cause of a lack of standardisation and has led to a lack of interoperability between systems in Europe and made cooperation in international operations more difficult. The fact that 25 different sets of rules on procurement are in force constitutes an obstacle to implementation of the European Capabilities Action Plan (ECAP). Relevant armaments purchasers are solely the governments of the 25 Member States, six of which account for 90% of armaments purchases and in some cases even hold stakes in the armaments industry. Consequently, Parliament called on the Member States and the industry to abandon the reservations which for decades have stood in the way of a European defence market and to set in train a new phase of cooperation based on an innovative strategy. It agreed with the Commission that current policies of juste retour and off-setting in the field of military procurement lead to large-scale distortions of competition and artificial divisions of labour between industrial partners, and greatly hinder the efficiency of public procurement. Pressure should be placed on national defence procurement agencies to alter the general practice of taking advantage of the derogation contained in Article 296 and to take measures to ensure that defence procurement is covered to a larger extent by Community legislation rather than by national legislation. Parliament believed that the Commission should both adopt an interpretative Communication reflecting its determination to stop the misuse of Article 296 and start to develop, in parallel, a new directive, tailored to the specific features of defence, for the purposes of the procurement of arms, ammunition and war material subject to Article 296. Parliament regarded a restrictive interpretation of national security interests as appropriate, given that Member States are already mutually dependent in areas such as monetary affairs and energy. It questioned to what extent any meaningful distinction at all can still be drawn between national and common European security interests. With regard to a new directive, both mandatory and optional instruments could be considered in connection with procurement procedures. The emphasis should be placed on creating greater transparency and fairness in the award of contracts. Parliament pointed out that, in addition to the actual acquisition of equipment, other aspects will need to be taken into account, such as research and development, offsetting agreements, maintenance, repair, retrofitting and training. There must be intensive consultation with stakeholders in drawing up a directive, and stresses the need for a business impact study and a foreign-relations impact study. Member States are urged to cooperate actively with the Commission on a new directive and to instruct the European Defence Agency (EDA) to develop, as an initial step, a code of conduct for defence procurement within the meaning of Article 296. This code should apply to contracts covered by Article 296 with the aim of introducing more competition and transparency to the sector. Parliament went on to offer suggestions on the content of the code of conduct. It should, for example, define preconditions for the exercise of the derogation under Article 296 and ensure the required transparency of reasons for exemption and non-publication of information. Parliament also urged the Commission to work closely with the EDA so as to establish in parallel a comprehensive action plan with accompanying measures in related areas, such as security of supply, transfer and exports, which are necessary for the creation of a level playing field for fair competition within the EU and to ensure the provision of reliable statistical information about the market. Parliament moved on to state that it recognised that defence procurement problems in the EU are partly linked to the absence of a genuine 'two-way street' with the United States. It questioned whether European defence procurement agencies should be recommended to make more European purchases in order to reinforce strategically the European defence industry in certain sectors. New EU defence procurement legislation should not be used as an instrument enabling US corporate interests unilaterally to infiltrate European defence procurement markets. At the same time it is indispensable that all Member States observe the Common Military List of the European Union (equipment covered by the European Union Code of Conduct on Arms Exports) adopted by the Council on 25 April 2005. Parliament called on the Commission, together with the EDA, to put forward long-term proposals indicating how closer links between EU procurement markets and those in the United States and also in countries such as Ukraine and, in specific sectors, Russia, could lead to both greater choice and more efficient specialisation. The opening up of the market is a precondition for strengthening a financially viable EU armaments industry, for developing capabilities. The inevitable concentration of the armaments industry should be subject to greater monitoring and control by the Directorate General for Competition of the Commission as regards the application of Community competition law, so that the advantages of mass production are not jeopardised by sectoral monopolies and the resulting market power of undertakings.
- 2005/11/16 Debate in Parliament
- 2005/10/10 Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
-
2005/10/05
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
-
2005/03/10
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2004/09/23
Non-legislative basic document published
-
COM(2004)0608
summary
This Green Paper is one of the measures announced by the European Commission in its Communication “Towards a European Union defence equipment policy”, adopted on 11 March 2003. Through these measures, the Commission intends to contribute to the gradual creation of a European defence equipment market (EDEM) which is more transparent and open between Member States and which, whilst respecting the sector’s specific nature, would increase economic efficiency. Moving towards a truly European market is crucial for strengthening the competitiveness of European industry, improving the allocation of defence resources and supporting the development of the Union 's military capabilities under the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). The establishment of the European Defence Agency with its responsibilities in the field of defence capabilities, research, acquisition and armaments, makes the development of such a market even more important. Creating an EDEM would require a set of complementary initiatives, including the establishment of an appropriate regulatory framework for the procurement of defence equipment. The opening up of defence markets, which are currently fragmented along national lines, would increase the commercial opportunities for European companies in the sector, including SMEs, and contribute to their growth and increase their competitiveness. The purpose of this Green Paper is to develop the debate on these issues, bearing in mind the principle of subsidiarity. For this purpose the Commission set up two working parties consisting of representatives of the Member States and European industry to contribute to the preparatory stages of the Green Paper. In the first part, the Green Paper identifies the reasons for specific action by giving a summary of the current state of defence procurement markets, their numerous special characteristics and the existing regulatory framework. In the second part, on the basis of this analysis, it considers possible lines of action following the identification of a number of obstacles limiting the access of European industries to Member States’ defence markets and hence restricting their growth opportunities. The Commission therefore proposes pursuing the debate on the case or Community action in the field of defence procurement. So far the Commission has identified two possible instruments, one limited to clarifying the existing legal framework and the other aimed at establishing specific rules in the field of defence, taking into account the sector’s specific characteristics. These instruments would not prejudice any complementary measures taken by the Member States in the appropriate fora. Indeed, they could not provide exhaustive answers to all the specific aspects of defence markets. This is the case in particular for security of supply, a concept bound to change with the growing convergence of national security interests in the context of European foreign, security and defence policy. The gradual development of a common approach in this field could facilitate application of Community instruments. Equally, these instruments would constitute a useful tool for the success of cooperation between Member States. This Green Paper marked the start of an official consultation process lasting four months from its date of publication (i.e. 23/01/2005 deadline for contributions from interested parties).
-
COM(2004)0608
summary
Documents
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2004)0608
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0288/2005
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T6-0440/2005
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
IMCO/6/24073New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|