BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps
download json


2005/2141(INI) Aid effectiveness and corruption in developing countries

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead DEVE VAN DEN BERG Margrietus (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion INTA
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2006/06/30
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
SP(2006)2311/2
2006/05/11
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
SP(2006)2095
2006/04/06
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
Documents
Results of vote in Parliament
2006/04/06
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Documents
Debate in Parliament
2006/04/06
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Margrietus van den BERG (PES, NL) on aid effectiveness and corruption in developing countries. (Please see the report of 20/02/2006.) It pointed to World Bank estimates that more than USD 1 000 000 million is paid in bribes every year throughout the world and the African Union estimates that corruption costs African economies more than 25% of Africa's GDP annually. Parliament called on the Commission to focus more specifically, in designing its development programmes, on issues of accountability and transparency, saying weak accountability mechanisms tend to facilitate corruption.

Parliament underlined the following:

- the need to support national parliaments in developing countries in their work as budget authorities by means of dialogue, information-sharing and capacity-building;

- the important role that a free and independent media can play in the fight against corruption. There should be greater EU support for projects assisting or strengthening such media in partner countries;

- the need to contribute to strengthening the legal system in those countries;

- the important role played by women also in the fight against corruption and the need for better education of women and girls;

- the importance of investment in the developing countries;

- the importance of the establishment of watchdogs by civil society in developing countries, requiring a system of checks and balances of their government; the Commission should reserve an appropriate percentage of budget aid for civil society watchdogs;

- the need for capacity-building in central and local institutions to combat corruption, especially in the light of the increase in aid given in the form of budget aid;

- the granting of budget aid must always be carefully preceded by fiduciary risk assessments on a case-by-case basis;

- budget aid should always be earmarked for a specific sector;

- there are major corruption risks involved in public procurement procedures and, consequently, transparent procurement rules and procedures should be promoted as a key priority.

Parliament called for more transparency in programmes for budget aid granted by the EU, including publication of the relevant information about the aid spent in the recipient country, and by involving parliaments and informing civil players in this process. The EU, as co-chair of the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Programme (PEFA), which provides a harmonized framework for assessing fiduciary risk in recipient countries, should include specific indicators to measure the level of corruption.

Parliament made several other recommendations, inter alia:

- Member States should promote a legally binding international instrument on the tracing and the marking of SALW and ammunition as soon as possible, and support regional initiatives to combat the illicit trade in SALW and their ammunition in the developing countries;

- there should be further enforcement of to the "Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative" in order to ensure the disclosure of information about payments between governments of developing countries and multinationals;

- Member States with financial centres must take all necessary legal and administrative action to ensure that illicitly acquired funds can be repatriated to the State of origin;

- the Commission and the Member States should establish an international system of blacklisting to prevent banks from lending large sums of money to corrupt regimes or individuals representing a government;

Finally, Parliament called upon the Commission and the Member States to ban public purchasing or procurement contracts with companies whose employees have been involved in corrupt activities with government ministers or officials or in any other way within a developing country, if those employees are not subject to disciplinary proceedings. Member States must refer such cases to the appropriate prosecution authorities.

Documents
T6-0141/2006
2006/04/06
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/02/28
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
A6-0048/2006
2006/02/28
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
A6-0048/2006
2006/02/20
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report by Margrietus van den BERG (PES, NL) on aid effectiveness and corruption in developing countries. MEPs pointed out that corruption hurts the poor disproportionately, restricting their access to public goods and lowering the quality of basic services. Many actors - including politicians, government officials, civil society, the media, multinationals and international donors - had a role to play in the fight against corruption. The report called on all the EU Member States to ratify the 1997 OECD Convention on the Bribery of Public Officials and the 2003 UN Convention against Corruption. And it urged the Commission and the Member States to establish "an international system of blacklisting to prevent banks from lending large sums of money to corrupt regimes or individuals representing a government".

MEPs asked the Commission, when designing its development programmes, to focus more specifically on issues of accountability and transparency. They stressed the need to support national parliaments in developing countries in their work as budget authorities by means of dialogue, information-sharing and capacity-building. The EU should also give greater support to projects assisting or strengthening a free and independent media in partner countries. The report stressed the need for the establishment of watchdogs by civil society in developing countries, involving a system of checks and balances of their governments, and called on the Commission to support this process by reserving an appropriate percentage of budget aid for civil society watchdogs.

Other recommendations included: more transparency in EU budget aid programmes, with the publication of information on the aid spent in each recipient country; the earmarking of budget aid for a specific sector; and the provision of technical and financial support for regional initiatives such as the African Peer Review Mechanism. Lastly, MEPs called on Member States with major financial centres on their territory to take legal and administrative measures to ensure that funds acquired illegally are repatriated to the country of origin.

2006/02/06
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
PE369.874
2005/09/08
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2005/05/24
   EP - VAN DEN BERG Margrietus (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Van den Berg A6-0048/2006 - par. 15 #

2006/04/06 Outcome: +: 511, -: 5, 0: 2
DE FR PL GB ES NL IT BE EL CZ HU PT SE AT DK FI SK IE LT LV SI MT LU EE CY
Total
79
64
49
51
28
25
20
20
19
18
17
17
16
15
13
11
11
9
8
6
6
5
5
4
2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
189

Germany PPE-DE

40

France PPE-DE

15

Poland PPE-DE

14

United Kingdom PPE-DE

16

Spain PPE-DE

10

Netherlands PPE-DE

7

Italy PPE-DE

6

Belgium PPE-DE

6

Greece PPE-DE

10

Czechia PPE-DE

11

Hungary PPE-DE

10

Portugal PPE-DE

6

Sweden PPE-DE

5

Austria PPE-DE

4

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

Gitte SEEBERG
1

Finland PPE-DE

3

Slovakia PPE-DE

7

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

Rihards PĪKS
1

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

Tunne KELAM
1

Cyprus PPE-DE

1
icon: PSE PSE
155

Germany PSE

20

France PSE

25

Poland PSE

9

United Kingdom PSE

13

Spain PSE

15

Netherlands PSE

7

Italy PSE

3

Belgium PSE

6

Greece PSE

6

Czechia PSE

For (1)

Libor ROUČEK
1

Hungary PSE

7

Portugal PSE

11

Sweden PSE

5

Austria PSE

7

Denmark PSE

5

Finland PSE

3

Slovakia PSE

3

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

Aloyzas SAKALAS
1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

Borut PAHOR
1

Malta PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

Robert GOEBBELS
1

Estonia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
60

Germany ALDE

6

France ALDE

10

Poland ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

11

Spain ALDE

1

Netherlands ALDE

5

Italy ALDE

2

Belgium ALDE

4

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Maria ROBSAHM
1

Austria ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

4

Finland ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

Marian HARKIN
1

Lithuania ALDE

4

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

Jelko KACIN
1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Siiri OVIIR
1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

Marios MATSAKIS
1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
32

Germany Verts/ALE

8

France Verts/ALE

6

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

Carl SCHLYTER
1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

Margrete AUKEN
1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

Satu HASSI
1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

Claude TURMES
1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
23

Germany GUE/NGL

5

France GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

Erik MEIJER
1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

Esko SEPPÄNEN
1
icon: UEN UEN
20

Poland UEN

10

Italy UEN

3

Denmark UEN

For (1)

Mogens CAMRE
1

Ireland UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

3
icon: NI NI
21

France NI

5

Poland NI

7

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Ashley MOTE

Abstain (1)

Jim ALLISTER
2

Italy NI

For (1)

Giovanni RIVERA
1

Belgium NI

2

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

For (1)

Andreas MÖLZER

Abstain (1)

Hans-Peter MARTIN
2

Slovakia NI

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

Poland IND/DEM

6

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

For (1)

Mario BORGHEZIO
1

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

Kathy SINNOTT
1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

2023-08-03Show (7) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0
date
2005-11-17T00:00:00
docs
title: PE365.027
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/2
date
2006-05-11T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2006)2095
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/2/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4576&j=0&l=en
docs/3
date
2006-05-11T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2006)2095
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3
date
2006-06-30T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2006)2311/2
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/4
date
2006-06-30T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2006)2311/2
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/4/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4576&j=0&l=en
2021-12-18Show (12) Changes | Timetravel
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE369.874
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE369.874
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0048_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0048_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4576&j=1&l=en
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2006-02-28T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0048_EN.html title: A6-0048/2006
events/2
date
2006-02-28T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0048_EN.html title: A6-0048/2006
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060406&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20060406&type=CRE
events/5
date
2006-04-06T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0141_EN.html title: T6-0141/2006
summary
events/5
date
2006-04-06T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0141_EN.html title: T6-0141/2006
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
2020-01-19Show (7) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: VAN DEN BERG Margrietus date: 2005-05-24T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2005-05-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VAN DEN BERG Margrietus group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-48&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0048_EN.html
docs/3/body
EC
docs/4/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-48&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0048_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-141
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0141_EN.html
2019-07-06Show (14) Changes | Timetravel
activities
  • date: 2005-09-08T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2005-05-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: VAN DEN BERG Margrietus body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • date: 2006-02-20T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2005-05-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: VAN DEN BERG Margrietus body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-02-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-48&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0048/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-04-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4576&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060406&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-141 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0141/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Development commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2005-05-24T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VAN DEN BERG Margrietus group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
DEVE
date
2005-05-24T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: PSE name: VAN DEN BERG Margrietus
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
docs
  • date: 2005-11-17T00:00:00 docs: title: PE365.027 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2006-02-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE369.874 title: PE369.874 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2006-02-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-48&language=EN title: A6-0048/2006 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-05-11T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4576&j=1&l=en title: SP(2006)2095 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2006-06-30T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4576&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)2311/2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2005-09-08T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-02-20T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report by Margrietus van den BERG (PES, NL) on aid effectiveness and corruption in developing countries. MEPs pointed out that corruption hurts the poor disproportionately, restricting their access to public goods and lowering the quality of basic services. Many actors - including politicians, government officials, civil society, the media, multinationals and international donors - had a role to play in the fight against corruption. The report called on all the EU Member States to ratify the 1997 OECD Convention on the Bribery of Public Officials and the 2003 UN Convention against Corruption. And it urged the Commission and the Member States to establish "an international system of blacklisting to prevent banks from lending large sums of money to corrupt regimes or individuals representing a government". MEPs asked the Commission, when designing its development programmes, to focus more specifically on issues of accountability and transparency. They stressed the need to support national parliaments in developing countries in their work as budget authorities by means of dialogue, information-sharing and capacity-building. The EU should also give greater support to projects assisting or strengthening a free and independent media in partner countries. The report stressed the need for the establishment of watchdogs by civil society in developing countries, involving a system of checks and balances of their governments, and called on the Commission to support this process by reserving an appropriate percentage of budget aid for civil society watchdogs. Other recommendations included: more transparency in EU budget aid programmes, with the publication of information on the aid spent in each recipient country; the earmarking of budget aid for a specific sector; and the provision of technical and financial support for regional initiatives such as the African Peer Review Mechanism. Lastly, MEPs called on Member States with major financial centres on their territory to take legal and administrative measures to ensure that funds acquired illegally are repatriated to the country of origin.
  • date: 2006-02-28T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-48&language=EN title: A6-0048/2006
  • date: 2006-04-06T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4576&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-04-06T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060406&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-04-06T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-141 title: T6-0141/2006 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Margrietus van den BERG (PES, NL) on aid effectiveness and corruption in developing countries. (Please see the report of 20/02/2006.) It pointed to World Bank estimates that more than USD 1 000 000 million is paid in bribes every year throughout the world and the African Union estimates that corruption costs African economies more than 25% of Africa's GDP annually. Parliament called on the Commission to focus more specifically, in designing its development programmes, on issues of accountability and transparency, saying weak accountability mechanisms tend to facilitate corruption. Parliament underlined the following: - the need to support national parliaments in developing countries in their work as budget authorities by means of dialogue, information-sharing and capacity-building; - the important role that a free and independent media can play in the fight against corruption. There should be greater EU support for projects assisting or strengthening such media in partner countries; - the need to contribute to strengthening the legal system in those countries; - the important role played by women also in the fight against corruption and the need for better education of women and girls; - the importance of investment in the developing countries; - the importance of the establishment of watchdogs by civil society in developing countries, requiring a system of checks and balances of their government; the Commission should reserve an appropriate percentage of budget aid for civil society watchdogs; - the need for capacity-building in central and local institutions to combat corruption, especially in the light of the increase in aid given in the form of budget aid; - the granting of budget aid must always be carefully preceded by fiduciary risk assessments on a case-by-case basis; - budget aid should always be earmarked for a specific sector; - there are major corruption risks involved in public procurement procedures and, consequently, transparent procurement rules and procedures should be promoted as a key priority. Parliament called for more transparency in programmes for budget aid granted by the EU, including publication of the relevant information about the aid spent in the recipient country, and by involving parliaments and informing civil players in this process. The EU, as co-chair of the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Programme (PEFA), which provides a harmonized framework for assessing fiduciary risk in recipient countries, should include specific indicators to measure the level of corruption. Parliament made several other recommendations, inter alia: - Member States should promote a legally binding international instrument on the tracing and the marking of SALW and ammunition as soon as possible, and support regional initiatives to combat the illicit trade in SALW and their ammunition in the developing countries; - there should be further enforcement of to the "Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative" in order to ensure the disclosure of information about payments between governments of developing countries and multinationals; - Member States with financial centres must take all necessary legal and administrative action to ensure that illicitly acquired funds can be repatriated to the State of origin; - the Commission and the Member States should establish an international system of blacklisting to prevent banks from lending large sums of money to corrupt regimes or individuals representing a government; Finally, Parliament called upon the Commission and the Member States to ban public purchasing or procurement contracts with companies whose employees have been involved in corrupt activities with government ministers or officials or in any other way within a developing country, if those employees are not subject to disciplinary proceedings. Member States must refer such cases to the appropriate prosecution authorities.
  • date: 2006-04-06T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: Development
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
DEVE/6/29254
New
  • DEVE/6/29254
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.30 Development cooperation
New
6.30
Development cooperation
2014-11-10Show (5) Changes
activities
  • date: 2005-09-08T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2005-05-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: VAN DEN BERG Margrietus body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • date: 2006-02-20T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2005-05-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: VAN DEN BERG Margrietus body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-02-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-48&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0048/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-04-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4576&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060406&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-141 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0141/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2005-05-24T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: VAN DEN BERG Margrietus
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
links
other
  • body: EC dg: Development
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
DEVE/6/29254
reference
2005/2141(INI)
title
Aid effectiveness and corruption in developing countries
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
6.30 Development cooperation
@parltrack
@parltrack@eupolicy.social
[javascript protected email address]
code AGPLv3.0+
data ODBLv1.0
site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

ParlTrack - 2011-2024

© European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
Hosted by AS250.net Foundation