BETA


2005/2175(INI) Evaluation of the European arrest warrant

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead LIBE HAZAN Adeline (icon: PSE PSE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 134o-p3

Events

2006/04/19
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/03/15
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2006/03/15
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by on the evaluation of the European arrest warrant. T he Commission's initial evaluation shows that the latter has demonstrated its effectiveness by comparison with the extradition procedure, while also making it possible to reduce the risks of a defendant or sentenced person eluding justice for reasons of 'legal sovereignty', as well as to fight organised crime and terrorism more effectively. One of the advances introduced by the European arrest warrant is the removal of interference by the political authorities in the procedure, by contrast with the extradition procedure.

Parliament referred to the wishes expressed by several Member States concerning retention of certain elements of the traditional extradition system (controls to avoid double jeopardy, intervention of the political authorities in the judicial procedure) or the introduction of additional grounds for refusal which Parliament stated, would be contrary to Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, such as political reasons, national security or human rights arguments. It also referred to the difficulties of transposition encountered by several Member States (especially Germany) and to the need to bring national constitutions into line with Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA in order to permit the surrender of nationals (in particular in Poland and Cyprus). These problems may undermine mutual trust and lead to a chain reaction which could threaten the implementation of the European arrest warrant by other Member States, as is demonstrated by the fact that, following the decision by the German Constitutional Court to annul the legislation transposing the Framework Decision, a number of Member States have indicated that they will have to return to applying, on a transitional basis, the extradition instruments that existed before the European arrest warrant, pending adoption of a new transposing law that is compatible with the German Basic Law. Parliament also referred to the Convention establishing a Nordic arrest warrant was signed on 15 December 2005 by Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Sweden and Norway and stated that the EU could usefully take inspiration from the Nordic arrest warrant to improve the effectiveness of the European arrest warrant.

Parliament addressed certain recommendations on the matter to the Council, notably as the following:

Transposition and implementation in practice: the Council should:

- adopt the framework decision on certain procedural rights in criminal proceedings throughout the EU, taking account of Parliament's amendments in its position of 12 April 2005; this measure is essential in order to ensure the same standard of legal protection for all European citizens, and its guarantees will facilitate the surrender by a Member State of one of its nationals to another Member State;

- ensure that, in the transposition of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, Member States do not reinstate systematic checks regarding double jeopardy for their nationals, as this would undermine both the effectiveness of the European arrest warrant and erode mutual trust between Member States;

- ensure that no political authority may interfere in the operation of the European arrest warrant;

- ensure that the difficulties persisting in some Member States over the application of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA are resolved;

Evaluation: the Council should

- undertake a more detailed evaluation of the problems encountered by legal professionals in the various Member States, backing it up with a qualitative assessment arrived at via a breakdown of the European arrest warrants by type of offence;

- inform and consult regularly the European Parliament and national parliaments on the progress achieved in the implementation of the European arrest warrant.

Fundamental rights: the Council should:

- ensure that the Member States, when transposing the Framework Decision, do not require the judicial authority executing a European arrest warrant systematically to check whether the warrant complies with fundamental rights. Parliament pointed out that the system is based on the principle of mutual recognition and the issuing Member State carries out that check.

- pay close attention to the issue of respect for human rights and individual freedoms in the implementation of the European arrest warrant, a task to which the proposed Agency for Fundamental Rights should be asked to contribute.

Effectiveness and democracy: the Council should ensure that the European arrest warrant be brought under the first pillar, so as to make the measures taken in connection with the European area of freedom, security and justice truly democratic and more effective.

Documents
2006/03/15
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/03/14
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2006/02/28
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2006/02/28
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2006/02/22
   EP - Vote in committee
2006/02/03
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2005/09/29
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2005/09/26
   EP - HAZAN Adeline (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2005/09/01
   EP - Non-legislative basic document
Documents
2005/08/31
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Documents

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Hazan A6-0049/2006 - résolution #

2006/03/15 Outcome: +: 521, -: 99, 0: 36
DE FR ES IT NL BE PL HU PT AT EL LT IE FI DK LV SK SI EE LU MT SE GB CY CZ
Total
92
69
50
56
26
22
50
18
22
18
22
12
12
14
14
9
11
6
6
6
5
18
71
6
21
icon: PSE PSE
185

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovakia PSE

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
234
2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Cyprus ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

5
icon: UEN UEN
26

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
28

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Slovakia NI

2

United Kingdom NI

3

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
32

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/1
date
2005-11-30T00:00:00
docs
title: PE365.111
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/3
date
2006-04-19T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2006)1725
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/3/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4514&j=0&l=en
docs/4
date
2006-04-19T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2006)1725
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
events/0/date
Old
2005-09-01T00:00:00
New
2005-08-31T00:00:00
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0455_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0455_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE367.966
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE367.966
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0049_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0049_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4514&j=0&l=en
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0455_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0455_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2006-02-28T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0049_EN.html title: A6-0049/2006
events/3
date
2006-02-28T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0049_EN.html title: A6-0049/2006
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060314&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20060314&type=CRE
events/6
date
2006-03-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0083_EN.html title: T6-0083/2006
summary
events/6
date
2006-03-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0083_EN.html title: T6-0083/2006
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 134o-p3
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 134-p3
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: HAZAN Adeline date: 2005-09-26T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2005-09-26T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HAZAN Adeline group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-455&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0455_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-49&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0049_EN.html
docs/4/body
EC
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-455&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0455_EN.html
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-49&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0049_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-83
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0083_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2005-09-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-455&language=EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: B6-0455/2005 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2005-09-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2005-09-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: HAZAN Adeline
  • date: 2006-02-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2005-09-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: HAZAN Adeline
  • date: 2006-02-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-49&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0049/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-03-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060314&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-03-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4514&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-83 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0083/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Justice and Consumers commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2005-09-26T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HAZAN Adeline group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
LIBE
date
2005-09-26T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: PSE name: HAZAN Adeline
docs
  • date: 2005-09-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-455&language=EN title: B6-0455/2005 type: Non-legislative basic document body: EP
  • date: 2005-11-30T00:00:00 docs: title: PE365.111 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2006-02-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE367.966 title: PE367.966 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2006-02-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-49&language=EN title: A6-0049/2006 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-04-19T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4514&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)1725 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2005-09-01T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-455&language=EN title: B6-0455/2005
  • date: 2005-09-29T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-02-22T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-02-28T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-49&language=EN title: A6-0049/2006
  • date: 2006-03-14T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060314&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-03-15T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4514&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-03-15T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-83 title: T6-0083/2006 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by on the evaluation of the European arrest warrant. T he Commission's initial evaluation shows that the latter has demonstrated its effectiveness by comparison with the extradition procedure, while also making it possible to reduce the risks of a defendant or sentenced person eluding justice for reasons of 'legal sovereignty', as well as to fight organised crime and terrorism more effectively. One of the advances introduced by the European arrest warrant is the removal of interference by the political authorities in the procedure, by contrast with the extradition procedure. Parliament referred to the wishes expressed by several Member States concerning retention of certain elements of the traditional extradition system (controls to avoid double jeopardy, intervention of the political authorities in the judicial procedure) or the introduction of additional grounds for refusal which Parliament stated, would be contrary to Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, such as political reasons, national security or human rights arguments. It also referred to the difficulties of transposition encountered by several Member States (especially Germany) and to the need to bring national constitutions into line with Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA in order to permit the surrender of nationals (in particular in Poland and Cyprus). These problems may undermine mutual trust and lead to a chain reaction which could threaten the implementation of the European arrest warrant by other Member States, as is demonstrated by the fact that, following the decision by the German Constitutional Court to annul the legislation transposing the Framework Decision, a number of Member States have indicated that they will have to return to applying, on a transitional basis, the extradition instruments that existed before the European arrest warrant, pending adoption of a new transposing law that is compatible with the German Basic Law. Parliament also referred to the Convention establishing a Nordic arrest warrant was signed on 15 December 2005 by Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Sweden and Norway and stated that the EU could usefully take inspiration from the Nordic arrest warrant to improve the effectiveness of the European arrest warrant. Parliament addressed certain recommendations on the matter to the Council, notably as the following: Transposition and implementation in practice: the Council should: - adopt the framework decision on certain procedural rights in criminal proceedings throughout the EU, taking account of Parliament's amendments in its position of 12 April 2005; this measure is essential in order to ensure the same standard of legal protection for all European citizens, and its guarantees will facilitate the surrender by a Member State of one of its nationals to another Member State; - ensure that, in the transposition of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, Member States do not reinstate systematic checks regarding double jeopardy for their nationals, as this would undermine both the effectiveness of the European arrest warrant and erode mutual trust between Member States; - ensure that no political authority may interfere in the operation of the European arrest warrant; - ensure that the difficulties persisting in some Member States over the application of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA are resolved; Evaluation: the Council should - undertake a more detailed evaluation of the problems encountered by legal professionals in the various Member States, backing it up with a qualitative assessment arrived at via a breakdown of the European arrest warrants by type of offence; - inform and consult regularly the European Parliament and national parliaments on the progress achieved in the implementation of the European arrest warrant. Fundamental rights: the Council should: - ensure that the Member States, when transposing the Framework Decision, do not require the judicial authority executing a European arrest warrant systematically to check whether the warrant complies with fundamental rights. Parliament pointed out that the system is based on the principle of mutual recognition and the issuing Member State carries out that check. - pay close attention to the issue of respect for human rights and individual freedoms in the implementation of the European arrest warrant, a task to which the proposed Agency for Fundamental Rights should be asked to contribute. Effectiveness and democracy: the Council should ensure that the European arrest warrant be brought under the first pillar, so as to make the measures taken in connection with the European area of freedom, security and justice truly democratic and more effective.
  • date: 2006-03-15T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
LIBE/6/30439
New
  • LIBE/6/30439
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 134-p3
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 134-p3
procedure/subject
Old
  • 7.40 Judicial cooperation
New
7.40
Judicial cooperation
activities
  • date: 2005-09-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-455&language=EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: B6-0455/2005 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2005-09-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2005-09-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: HAZAN Adeline
  • date: 2006-02-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2005-09-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: HAZAN Adeline
  • date: 2006-02-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-49&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0049/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-03-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060314&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-03-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4514&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-83 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0083/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2005-09-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: HAZAN Adeline
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
LIBE/6/30439
reference
2005/2175(INI)
title
Evaluation of the European arrest warrant
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 134-p3
stage_reached
Procedure completed
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
7.40 Judicial cooperation