Activites

• 2008/10/31 Final act published in Official Journal
  • Regulation 2008/1008
  • OJ L 293 31.10.2008, p. 0003
• 2008/09/24 Final act signed
• 2008/09/24 End of procedure in Parliament
• 2008/07/09 Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
  • T6-0342/2008 summary

    The European Parliament adopted, under the 2nd reading of the codecision procedure, a legislative resolution approving the Council’s common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (recast). The recommendation for second reading (under the codecision procedure) had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Arūnas DEGUTIS (ALDE, LT), on behalf of the Committee on Transport and Tourism.

• 2008/07/08 Debate in Parliament
  • Debate in Parliament
• 2008/06/25 Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
  • A6-0264/2008
• 2008/06/24 Vote in committee, 2nd reading
• 2008/04/24 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading
• #2863
• 2008/04/18 Council Meeting
  • 16160/4/2007 summary

    The Council was able to agree with the main elements of the Commission proposal. It has, however, decided to modify the text on certain important points. Most of these modifications seek to ensure complete clarity regarding the licensing authorities; the respective responsibility of the Community and the Member States with regard to third countries; and balancing regulatory oversight with administrative requirements. The impact study carried out by the Commission was considered in detail.The Council accepted twenty of the amendments proposed by Parliament. Amendments relating to traffic distribution rules and compliance with social legislation were the subject of lengthy and difficult negotiations in the Council and were finally agreed upon as part of a compromise package with the Parliament. The Council hopes that this will form the basis of an overall agreement at second reading. The Council decided to reject amendments on: broadening the scope of the Regulation and the imposition of an unfair burden on operators, which would detract from the fairness of the licensing regime.In summary, the main modifications made by the common position are as follows:Definitions: the Council modified Articles 2 and 3 on definitions in order to clarify, unambiguously, that the Member State authority will be responsible for the safety oversight of any given operator as well as being responsible for issuing operating licences.Wet-leasing aircraft: the Council has sought to find the correct balance between regulatory oversight, on the one hand, and the simplification of administrative requirements on the other. As such the Council has modified the text to allow operators to wet lease aircraft. Strict conditions, however, have been set out regarding the wet leasing of non-Community aircraft (aircraft whose safety control is not subject to Community standards).The international dimension: the Council has removed certain paragraphs, which in its view, were not in accordance with the various competencies of the Member States and the Community. As such the modified text clarifies that the Member States will retain the right to impose restrictions on code share arrangements between Community and non-Community carriers if the country of the foreign carrier restricts the commercial opportunities available to Community carriers.Public service obligations: on the matter of public service obligations the Council has simplified some of the rules and procedures and made other changes in order to ensure that they are consistent with the aims and objectives of public service obligations.Restrictions on traffic rights: the Council has introduced a new Article imposing traffic rights restrictions in case of serious environmental concerns. This will align the Regulation with related existing Regulations. A safeguard clause has been incorporated to ensure that such measures are non-discriminatory and fully justified.Distribution of traffic within airport systems: taking passengers’ interests into account, the Council has modified the text in order to reinforce the principle that airports, in cases where there are rules on the distribution of traffic, are served by an adequate transport infrastructure.Pricing transparency: the Council has broadened the scope of pricing transparency to include all flights departing from Community airports (regardless of destination). The common position requires that all fees must be published – including fees, taxes and charges.

• #2835
• 2007/11/29 Council Meeting
• 2007/07/11 Results of vote in Parliament
  • Results of vote in Parliament
  • T6-0337/2007 summary

    The European Parliament adopted the report by Arūnas DEGUTIS (ALDE, LT) on the proposal for a regulation on common rules for the operation of air transport services in the Community (recast).The report deals with the Commission proposal on the revision the 1992 "third liberalisation package" of the internal aviation market that aims to increase market efficiency, to enhance the safety of air services and to improve passenger protection. The regulation lays down rules for, inter alia, operating licences, leasing of aircraft, public service obligations, traffic distribution rule and price transparency. The main amendments are as follows:Scope: the regulation regulates the licensing of Community air carriers, the right of Community air carriers to operate air services within the Community, and the pricing of air services operated within theCommunity. Parliament wishes to extend the scope of the regulation by including provisions on information and non-discrimination in pricing shall apply to flights departing from an airport situated in the territory of a Member State and to flights contracted by a Community carrier departing from an airport located in a third country to an airport situated in the territory of a Member State, unless air carriers are subject to the same obligations in that third country.Definitions: the definition of “regional airport” has been deleted. A new article defining a ‘dry lease agreement’ has been introduced. It shall mean an agreement between air carriers where the aircraft is operated under the AOC of the lessee. A ‘wet lease agreement’ shall mean an agreement between air carriers where the aircraft is operated under the AOC of the lessor. The ‘Principal place of business’ shall mean the place of the head office and, if any, the registered office of a Community air carrier in a Member State within, to or from which the Community air carrier carries out a significant part of its operational activities.Insurance: the airline should provide evidence that it has sufficient insurance cover to be able to refund sums paid and to cover the costs of repatriating passengers in the event of it being unable to operate booked flights because of insolvency or revocation of its operating licence. The amount of net capital is an important indicator of the financial situation of the companies. Therefore every air carrier shall satisfy a minimum criterion in this regard. Parliament calls for a minimum of EUR 100 000.Validity of operating licences: the competent licensing authority in any case review compliance with these requirements in the following cases: (a) two years after a new operating licence has been granted, or (b) when a potential problem has been suspected, or (c) at the request of the Commission.The time limit of 6 months from cessation of operations is established practice and should be retained (as opposed to 3 months). In advance of any plans to operate new scheduled services or non-scheduled services to a continent or a world region not previously served, change the type or number of aircraft used or to substantially change the scale of its activities.Suspension and withdrawal of operating licences: the competent licensing authority shall suspend or revoke the operating licence if there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the Community air carrier cannot meet its actual and potential obligations for a 12-month period.Registering aircraft: the Member State whose competent licensing authority is responsible for granting the operating licence of the Community air carrier may require such aircraft to be registered in its national register.Short-term wet leasing: in the case of short-term wet lease agreements to meet temporary needs of a Community air carrier, or otherwise in exceptional circumstances the competent licensing authority may grant waivers to the requirement of registration provided that: (a) the Community air carrier can justify such leasing on the basis of an exceptional need, in which case a waiver may be granted for a period of up to 7 months, that may, in exceptional circumstances, be renewed once only for a second period of up to 7 months; or (b) the Community air carrier demonstrates that leasing is necessary to satisfy seasonal capacity needs, which cannot reasonably be satisfied through leasing aircraft in which case the waiver may be granted for a period of up to 7 months, that may be renewed; or (c) the Community air carrier demonstrates that leasing is necessary to overcome unforeseen operational difficulties, such as technical problems (in which case the waiver shall be of a limited duration which is strictly necessary for overcoming the difficulties).Rights of defence: a new article stipulates that the competent licensing authority and the Commission shall ensure that, when adopting a decision to suspend or revoke the operating licence of a Community air carrier, the Community air carrier concerned is given the opportunity of being heard, taking into account the need, in some cases, for an urgency procedure. Social legislation: with respect to employees of a Community air carrier operating air services from an operational base outside the territory of the Member State where that Community air carrier has its principal place of business, Member States shall ensure the proper application of Community and national social legislation.Provision of intracommunity air services: an amendment aims at specifying that the liberalization will be applied exclusively within EU and to Community carriers without modifying the existing bilateral agreement with third countries. The carriers of third countries will be authorized only if they have the underlying rights in the air services agreements in order to respect the reciprocity principle.Access to airports: the report calls for airports to be served by an adequate transport infrastructure making it possible to arrive at the airport, using public transport, within an hour. General principle of the public service obligations: when a Member State wishes to impose a public service obligation, it shall communicate the complete text of the envisaged imposition of the public service obligation to the Commission, to the other Member States concerned, to the airports concerned and to the air carriers operating the route in question. Parliament believes that any definition of ‘regional airport’ for the purpose of public service obligations will include some airports in economically viable regions and exclude some airports in regions needing economic or social support. PSOs are justified only to airports which serve regions with economic or social needs. Therefore this definition should be deleted.Passenger information: air carriers operating within the Community shall provide the general public with comprehensive information on their air fares and rates and on all applicable taxes, non-avoidable charges, surcharges and fees levied by them for the benefit of third parties. Air fares published in any form, including on the Internet, which are addressed directly or indirectly to the travelling public shall include all applicable taxes, non avoidable charges, surcharges and fees known at the time of publication. Air fares shall not incorporate costs not actually incurred by air carriers.Optional price supplements: shall be communicated in a clear, transparent and unambiguous way at the start of any booking process and their acceptance by the passenger should be on an "opt-in" basis. Implied agreements to accept such supplements shall be null and void. All costs which are not part of the air fare and which are not levied by air carriers operating within the Community must be comprehensively advertised by the "ticket seller". An air carrier may not impose rules on passengers and travel agencies serving, in practice, to restrict their free and equal access to air fares.Transparency in charging: air carriers shall advertise their air fares and rates and the conditions attached, and all applicable taxes, charges and fees levied by them for the benefit of third parties, using the following categories: (i) taxes and other state charges and duties; (ii) air traffic control charges; (iii) charges, duties, fees and other costs for the benefit of the airlines; (iv) fees, levies, charges and other costs for the benefit of the airport operators.Where airport or on-board security costs are included in the price of an air ticket, those costs shall be shown separately on the ticket or otherwise indicated to the passenger. Security taxes and charges, whether levied by Member States or by air carriers or entities, shall be transparent and shall be used exclusively to meet airport or onboard aircraft security costs.Sanctions: as the Commission does not provide any sanction if the rules on pricing are not applied, the resolution states that Member States shall lay down sanctions for infringements thereof.It should be noted that Annex II was deleted by the MEPs.

• 2007/07/10 Debate in Parliament
  • Debate in Parliament
• #2805
• 2007/06/06 Council Meeting
  • 2805 summary

    The Council reached a general approach on a proposal for a Regulation on common rules for the operation of air transport services in the Community, pending the adoption of the opinion of the European Parliament at first reading.The text agreed includes several modifications to the Commission proposal, which concern in particular the following issues: definitions, in particular adding a definition of "principal place of business"; requirements for leasing by Community carriers, financial requirements for the granting and continuing validity of an operating licence; provision of intra-Community air services; provisions on pricing and the rules on prices transparency.

• 2007/05/11 Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • A6-0178/2007
• 2007/05/08 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
• 2006/09/05 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
• 2006/07/18 Legislative proposal published
  • COM(2006)0396 summary

    PURPOSE : to establish common rules for the operation of air transport services in the Community.PROPOSED ACT : Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.CONTENT : the draft regulation will ensure an efficient and homogeneous application of Community legislation for the internal aviation market via stricter and more precise application criteria (e.g. for operating licences, leasing of aircraft, public service obligations and traffic distribution rules). It also reinforces the internal market by lifting still existing restrictions on the provision of air services stemming from old bilateral agreements between Member States and by conferring to the Community the right to negotiate intra-Community traffic rights with third countries. It enhances consumer rights by promoting price transparency and non-discrimination.The proposal simplifies and consolidates the legislation as it removes obsolescent parts of the third package and clarifies the text where needed. The three existing regulations of the third package will be consolidated into a single text.More specifically, the proposal aims to : 1. reinforce the requirements for the granting and revoking of an operating Licence : the financial health of the airlines is being checked with different degrees of severity depending on the Member State that issued the licence. Therefore, a real level-playing field between airlines from different Member States is not always assured and consolidation of the market is slowed down. Furthermore, the continued operation of financially fragile air companies involves safety risks, in addition to the financial risks incurred by customers in the case of bankruptcy of an air carrier.The proposal requires Member States to reinforce the supervision of the operating licences and to suspend or revoke it when the requirements of the regulation are no longer met. In order to avoid inaction of a Member State , the proposal confers the right to the Commission to revoke the operating licence. The proposal has been drafted such as to take allow for the possibility of a future extension of the competencies of the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) for safety oversight and/or licensing such as to ensure the most efficient and consistent supervision of the air carriers;2.strengthen the requirements for the leasing of aircraft : wet-leasing of aircraft from third countries provides EU airlines with important flexibility which thereby enhances the economic efficiency of the EU airline industry to the benefit of consumers. However, the application of the present provisions of regulation 2407/92/EEC raise social and safety concerns. Rules and  practice with regard to leasing (especially wet-leasing i.e. leasing of aircraft with crew) differ between Member States. The safety assessment of leased aircraft from third countries is not pursued with the same rigour in all Member States, creating concerns about safety levels. The sometimes regular recourse to wet-leasing from third countries spurs concern about potentially adverse social consequences. The proposal introduces stricter requirements in order to minimize the risk of adverse social consequences and to enhance safety. The proposal emphasizes that, in order to agree with leasing agreements, the competent licensing authority must confirm that safety standards equivalent to the Community safety requirements are met. Concerning the leasing of aircraft registered in third countries, they will only be allowed in exceptional circumstances for a maximum duration of six months and renewable only once in a second non-consecutive period of up to six months;3. clarify the rules applicable to public service obligations (PSO) : the rules applicable to public service obligations have been revised in order to lighten the administrative burden, to avoid excessive recourse to PSO and to attract more competitors in the tender procedures. The publication obligations have been modified by limiting the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union to a shortened notice. To avoid excessive recourse to PSO, the Commission may require in individual cases the production of an economic report explaining the context of the PSO and the assessment of their adequacy should be performed with particular care when they are intended to be imposed on routes that are already been served by rail services with a travel time of less than three hours. The tender procedures have been modified by extending the maximum concession period from three to four years (and five years in the case of ultra-peripheral regions).The tender procedure for the renewal of a concession must be launched at least six months in advance in order to allow a careful assessment of the continued necessity of the restricted access to the route.Furthermore, an urgency procedure has been introduced to cope with sudden interruptions of service on routes with a PSO. If the proposed regulation, once adopted, retains guarantees of transparency, non-discrimination and proportionality equivalent to those proposed by the Commission in its proposal concerning the determination and award of public service compensations, and in order to give operators legal certainty regarding compensation paid for the execution of PSOs awarded in accordance with this regulation, the Commission intends to adopt, at the latest at the time of the entry into force of the regulation, a binding act based on art. 86(3) declaring compatible and exempting of notification compensation granted in conformity with the regulation insofar as this may constitute State aid. This act could take the form of an update of Commission decision of 28 November 2005 inserting a reference to this new regulation and extending its scope to any PSO compensation granted to airlines in conformity with this regulation;4.remove inconsistencies between the internal aviation market and services to third countries : taking account of the opinions expressed during the consultation process, the proposal addresses relations with third countries only insofar as there is a direct link with provisions contained in the third package. To ensure coherence between the internal market and its external aspects, including those of the Single European Sky, access by airlines of third countries to the intra-Community market should be managed in a coherent manner through negotiations at Community level. Therefore, the European Communities will be responsible for negotiating intra-Community traffic rights with third countries. Remaining restrictions from existing bilateral agreements between Member States will be lifted, ensuring non-discrimination in respect of code sharing and pricing by Community air carriers on routes to third countries involving points in Member States other than their own;5. clarify the rules applicable to traffic distribution between airports : the present two-step procedure - first establishment of an airport system and then definition of the traffic distribution rules - is replaced by a one-step procedure where the concept of an "airport system" is abandoned: Member States may introduce traffic distribution rules on airports serving the same city or conurbation, but the prior approval of the Commission is required (after consultation of the appropriate committee). It adds that the airports in question should be served by an adequate transport infrastructure and the airports and the city or conurbation they shall serve should be linked by frequent, reliable and efficient public transport services. The proposal states that the traffic distribution rules shall respect the principles of proportionality and transparency, and shall be based on objective criteria. This rule confirms that traffic distribution rules may not be abused in order to discriminate between air carriers;6. promote price transparency for passengers and fair price behaviour : the publication of fares that exclude taxes, charges and even fuel surcharges has become a widespread practice that hampers price transparency. Insufficient price transparency leads to distortions of competition and therefore consumers face on average higher fares. The Commission also still observes cases of discrimination on the basis of the place of residence of the passenger. In the proposal, air fares have to include all applicable taxes, charges and fees and air carriers shall provide the general public with comprehensive information on their air fares and rates and the conditions attached. Air fares shall be set without discrimination on the basis of place of residence or the nationality of the passenger within the Community. Furthermore, for the access to a carrier’s air fares, they may be no discrimination on the basis of the place of establishment of the travel agent.The experience with the application of the third package on air transport liberalisation has shown that there has not been any market failure that would justify maintaining in force specific provisions regulating air fares such as the safeguard measures provided in article 6 of regulation 2409/92/EEC. In this context, and in the light of the general competition rules, these sector-specific measures are removed from the regulation.

  • DG Energy and Transport, TAJANI Antonio

Documents

• Legislative proposal published: COM(2006)0396
• Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0178/2007
• Debate in Council: 2805
• Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
• Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
• Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T6-0337/2007
• Council position published: 16160/4/2007
• Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading: A6-0264/2008
• Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
• Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading: T6-0342/2008
• : Regulation 2008/1008
• : OJ L 293 31.10.2008, p. 0003

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)