BETA


2007/0099(COD) Access to the international road haulage market. Recast

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead TRAN GROSCH Mathieu (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Former Responsible Committee TRAN GROSCH Mathieu (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Former Committee Opinion JURI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 071

Events

2016/10/31
   EC - Follow-up document
Documents
2016/10/31
   EC - Follow-up document
Documents
2014/08/13
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2014/04/14
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 on access to the international road haulage market, the Commission presents a report on the state of the Union road transport market.

The report contains:

· an analysis of the market situation , including an evaluation of the effectiveness of controls and the evolution of employment conditions in the profession ;

· an assessment on whether harmonisation of the rules of enforcement and road user charges, as well as social and safety legislation, has progressed to such an extent that the further opening of domestic road transport markets, including cabotage , could be envisaged.

Market situation : the main developments affecting the road haulage market since the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 consist of overarching trends such as the economic crisis and the successive enlargements of the EU.

The report makes the following points:

· although the sector appeared to be slowly recovering from the economic crisis until 2011, transport volumes have since dropped again , following developments in the rest of the economy ;

· other major trends that had been present before the economic crisis continue to play a significant part in defining transport movements, such as the growing role of freight forwarders and third party logistics providers in consolidating loads and in contractual relations with hauliers ;

· the adoption of the 2009 road package has contributed to providing hauliers and enforcers with common standards and criteria for access to the occupation and to the international road haulage market. However, certain provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 are difficult to apply, in particular those relating to stable establishment of road haulage undertakings and to cabotage;

· the shortage of drivers is mitigated by the crisis but remains a source of concern, particularly for specialised drivers. In the future, this will create new demands for drivers and qualifications, including within an ageing workforce.

· working conditions remain difficult in the road haulage sector, while contractual relations remain marked by high levels of self-employment ;

· with a decreasing pool of available drivers , companies must reduce high levels of empty running in order to make better use of their staff.

Under these conditions, the Commission considers that improved efficiency of the road haulage sector will contribute to the competitiveness of the EU economy as a whole.

Convergence of market indicators

Gradual cost convergence : Member States have different cost structures in the road haulage sector. Whilst it is unlikely that cost differences will disappear entirely, the gap has been constantly narrowing: (i) hauliers involved in international transport are exposed to costs such as road charging and fuel costs, which are applied to users regardless of the Member

State of registration; (ii) the participation of drivers in international transport operations, in which remunerations are traditionally higher, has led to an increase in wage levels particularly in those Member States that joined the EU in 2004 and 2007.

The gradual convergence of cost levels compels hauliers to compete on efficiency and quality of services, benefitting transport users throughout the EU economy. However, it is not a competence of the EU nor is it an aim of the Single Market to equalise costs.

Legislative developments : these are leading to further harmonisation of the framework conditions in the road haulage sector. This includes the increasing use of road charging systems, additional technical harmonisation and enhanced safety of road transport vehicles, and increased cooperation between EU Member States in tackling traffic offenses.

These developments limit the risk for road safety that an increase in competitive pressure could create, notably in the case of further market opening.

The Commission considers that there is some scope for further harmonisation in enforcement of the provisions on access to the road haulage market , which continue to diverge between Member States. In particular, the provisions on cabotage in Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 and on stable and effective establishment in Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 do not appear to be applied in a uniform way. Addressing such shortcomings will help to limit unlawful out-flagging, which negatively affects competition and working conditions.

Next steps : the Commission suggests:

· considering a further reform to clarify the provisions on access to the EU road haulage market. Clearer rules would provide the basis for an enhanced culture of compliance and limit the possibilities for fraud (both in the fiscal or social sphere);

· review restrictions on the operation of cabotage , as domestic markets account for around two thirds of all road transport volumes moved. Gradually removing these restrictions could contribute to reducing the administrative burden that the current complex unclear rules create. In addition, this would allow a more efficient matching of transport offer and demand as this could lead to a reduction of empty runs, and would play a part in increasing the sector's economic and fuel efficiency;

· design measures aiming at restoring the attractiveness of the profession and improving the working environment of drivers . This includes measures on enforcement, control and mitigation of fiscal and social fraud, as well as improved training levels and skills.

Lastly, whenever the current and envisaged instruments and measures mentioned in the report involve the processing of personal data , this must be done in compliance with Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of personal data and the national provisions implementing it.

2009/11/14
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to set out the rules on the international carriage of goods by road.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for access to the international road haulage market.

CONTENT: the Council adopted three regulations that seek to modernise, replace and merge provisions governing road transport operators and access to the road transport markets, following a second reading agreement with the European Parliament under the codecision procedure. These regulations concern:

access to the international road haulage market; on access to the international market of coach and bus services ; admission to the occupation of road transport operator .

This Regulation on common rules for access to the international road haulage market seeks to simplify and harmonise further the current rules by consolidating and merging Regulations (EC) No 881/92, (EC) No 3118/93 and Directive 2006/94/EC on access to the road transport market.

The main objective is to eliminate legal uncertainty for Community hauliers and adapt legislation to market needs.

The main points of the Regulation are as follows:

Cabotage : the Regulation provides that any haulier for hire or reward who is a holder of a Community licence and whose driver, if he is a national of a third country, holds a driver attestation, shall be entitled, under the conditions laid down in the text, to carry out cabotage operations. Once the goods carried in the course of an incoming international carriage have been delivered, hauliers will be permitted to carry out up to three cabotage operations following the international carriage from another Member State or from a third country to the host Member State. The last unloading in the course of a cabotage operation before leaving the host Member State shall take place within 7 days from the last unloading in the host Member State in the course of the incoming international carriage. Hauliers may carry out some or all of these cabotage operations in any Member State under the condition that they are limited to one cabotage operation per Member State within 3 days of the unladen entry into the territory of that Member State.

Safeguard procedure : in the event of serious disturbance of the national transport market in a given geographical area due to, or aggravated by, cabotage, any Member State may refer the matter to the Commission with a view to the adoption of safeguard measures. It must provide the Commission with the necessary information and notify it of the measures it intends to take as regards resident hauliers. ‘Serious disturbance of the national transport market in a given geographical area’ is defined as the existence on the market of problems specific to it, such that there is a serious and potentially enduring excess of supply over demand, implying a threat to the financial stability and survival of a significant number of hauliers.

The Commission will examine the situation on the basis in particular of the relevant data and decide within 1 month of receipt of the Member State’s request whether or not safeguard measures are necessary and shall adopt them if they are necessary. Such measures may involve the temporary exclusion of the area concerned from the scope of the Regulation.

Safeguard measures will remain in force for a period not exceeding 6 months, renewable once within the same limits of validity.

If the Commission decides to adopt safeguard measures concerning one or more Member States, the competent authorities of the Member States involved shall be required to take measures of equivalent scope in respect of resident hauliers. The Council may take a different decision from the Commission under conditions set out in the text.

Sanctioning of infringements by the Member State of establishment: rules on the withdrawal of the Community licence are clarified and strengthened. The Regulation provides that in the event of a serious infringement of Community road transport legislation committed in any Member State, the Member State of establishment of the haulier who has committed such infringement shall take the appropriate action which may include a warning, if provided for by national law, to pursue the matter which may lead, inter alia, to the imposition of the following administrative penalties: (a) temporary or permanent withdrawal of some or all of the certified true copies of the Community licence; (b) temporary or permanent withdrawal of the Community licence.

These penalties may be determined after the final decision on the matter has been taken and shall have regard to the seriousness of the infringement committed by the holder of the Community licence and to the total number of certified true copies of that licence that he holds in respect of international traffic.

In the event of a serious infringement regarding any misuse whatsoever of driver attestations , the Member State of establishment of the haulier who committed such infringement shall impose appropriate penalties, such as: (a) suspending the issue of driver attestations; (b) withdrawing driver attestations; (c) making the issue of driver attestations subject to additional conditions in order to prevent misuse; (d) withdrawing, temporarily or permanently, some or all of the certified true copies of the Community licence; (e) withdrawing, temporarily or permanently, the Community licence.

Member States should enter in their national electronic register of road transport undertakings all serious infringements committed by hauliers which have led to the imposition of a penalty.

Report: the Commission shall draw up a report on the state of the Community road transport market by the end of 2013. The report shall contain an analysis of the market situation, including an evaluation of the effectiveness of controls and the evolution of employment conditions in the profession, as well as an assessment as to whether harmonisation of the rules in the fields, inter alia, of enforcement and road user charges, as well as social and safety legislation, has progressed to such an extent that the further opening of domestic road transport markets, including cabotage, could be envisaged.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 04/12/2009. It shall apply from 04/12/2011, with the exception of Articles 8 and 9 (rules applicable to sabotage operations), which shall apply from 14 May 2010.

2009/10/21
   CSL - Draft final act
Documents
2009/10/21
   CSL - Final act signed
2009/10/21
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2009/09/24
   CSL - Act approved by Council, 2nd reading
2009/09/24
   CSL - Council Meeting
2009/06/23
   EC - Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading
Details

After several months of negotiations under the Czech Presidency, Parliament and the Council agreed on a compromise at second reading, in particular concerning the definition of cabotage.

The Commission can accept the compromise amendment adopted by the European Parliament after the second reading to confirm this agreement.

2009/04/23
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted a legislative resolution modifying, under the second reading of the codecision procedure, the Council’s common position on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for access to the international road haulage market (recast).

The amendments are the result of a compromise between Parliament and Council.

The main amendments are as follows:

Market situation : a new recital states that the gradual integration of the single European market should lead to the elimination of restrictions of access to the internal market of Member States. Nevertheless, this should take into account the effectiveness of controls and the evolution of employment conditions in the profession, as well as the harmonisation of the rules in the fields, inter alia, of enforcement and road user changes, as well as social and safety legislation. The Commission should closely monitor the market situation as well as the harmonisation mentioned above and propose, if appropriate, further opening of domestic road transport markets, including cabotage.

Roadside checks: road side checks should be carried out without discrimination, directly or indirectly, on the grounds of nationality of the road transport operator or the country of establishment of the road transport operator or of registration of the vehicle.

Cabotage: the frequency of cabotage operations and the period in which they can be performed should be more clearly defined (rather than limited.)

The Regulation is without prejudice to the provisions concerning the incoming or outgoing carriage of goods by road as one leg of a combined transport journey as laid down in Council Directive 92/106/EEC on the establishment of common rules for certain types of combined transport of goods between Member States. National journeys by road within a host Member State which are not part of a combined transport operation as laid down in Council Directive 92/106/EEC fall within the definition of cabotage and should accordingly be subject to the requirements of this Regulation.

The text states that national road haulage services carried out in the host Member State by a non-resident haulier shall only be deemed to conform to this Regulation if the haulier can produce clear evidence of the incoming international carriage and of each consecutive cabotage operation carried out. The information which comprises evidence is listed in the text. No additional document shall be required in order to prove that the conditions laid down in the article have been met.

Sanctioning of infringement by Member State of establi shment : the Member State of establishment of the haulier who has committed an infringement shall take the appropriate action which may include a warning, if provided for by national law.

Communication between Member States : the final decision must be notified within 6 weeks, rather than 2 months.

Application: certain articles on cabotage will only enter into force 6 months after the publication of the Regulation.

Documents
2009/04/22
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2009/04/02
   EP - Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
Documents
2009/04/02
   EP - Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
Documents
2009/03/31
   EP - Vote in committee, 2nd reading
Details

The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report drawn up by Mathieu GROSCH (EPP-ED, BE), modifying, under the second reading of codecision procedure, the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for access to the international road haulage market (recast).

The main amendments are as follows:

Market situation : a new recital states that the gradual integration of the single European market should lead to the elimination of restrictions of access to the internal market of Member States. Nevertheless, this should take into account the effectiveness of controls and the evolution of employment conditions in the profession, as well as the harmonisation of the rules in the fields, inter alia, of enforcement and road user changes, as well as social and safety legislation. The Commission should closely monitor the market situation as well as the harmonisation mentioned above and propose, if appropriate, further opening of domestic road transport markets, including cabotage.

Roadside checks : road side checks should be carried out without discrimination, directly or indirectly, on the grounds of nationality of the road transport operator or the country of establishment of the road transport operator or of registration of the vehicle.

Cabotage: the frequency of cabotage operations and the period in which they can be performed should be more clearly defined (rather than limited.)

The Regulation is without prejudice to the provisions concerning the incoming or outgoing carriage of goods by road as one leg of a combined transport journey as laid down in Council Directive 92/106/EEC on the establishment of common rules for certain types of combined transport of goods between Member States. National journeys by road within a host Member State which are not part of a combined transport operation as laid down in Council Directive 92/106/EEC fall within the definition of cabotage and should accordingly be subject to the requirements of this Regulation.

Sanctioning of infringement by Member State of establishment : the Member State of establishment of the haulier who has committed an infringement shall take the appropriate action which may include a warning, if provided for by national law.

Communication between Member States : the final decision must be notified within 6 weeks, rather than 2 months.

Application : certain articles on cabotage will only enter into force 6 months after the publication of the Regulation.

2009/02/26
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2009/01/29
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2009/01/19
   EP - GROSCH Mathieu (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2009/01/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading
2009/01/12
   EC - Commission communication on Council's position
Details

The Commission considers that the common position reflects the main objectives of its proposal and can therefore support it. The common position adopted by the Council integrated as such or in principle a certain number of the amendments adopted by the European Parliament, all of which were also acceptable as such or in principle for the Commission. These amendments concern:

the definition of the exception for the carriage of mail; the limitation of details to be contained in the evidence to be produced for the international carriage; the deletion of the reference to working time as mandatory rules applicable to cabotage; the introduction of a safeguard procedure in the event of serious disturbances due to cabotage; and the deletion of the reference to repeated minor infringements; a provision on cabotage in a transit country.

The common position did not include the following amendments, which were acceptable in principle or with redrafting for the Commission:

a recital on the relation to the directive 92/106/EEC on combined transport; the clearer use of the concept of "temporary"; the imposition of fines as one possibility of a penalty; the fixation of the date of application on 1 January 2009; the common position foresees to apply the regulation 24 months after its entry into force.

Other amendments, deemed as unacceptable by the Commission, have not been included in the common position. They are as follows:

the further opening of the cabotage market; the authorisation of cabotage after partial unloading; the authorisation for closer cooperation on cabotage between certain Member States; the reference to the posting of workers directive as rules applicable to cabotage; the possibility for Member States to regulate cross trade;

the demand for a single document for all kind of road transports.

2009/01/09
   CSL - Council position
Details

The common position adopted by the Council, by qualified majority, integrated as such or in principle a certain number of the amendments adopted by the European Parliament, all of which were also acceptable as such or in principle for the Commission

The key policy issues are as follows:

Community licence and driver attestation : the Commission proposal foresees the issuing of a Community licence for a renewable period of 5 years. The common position therefore extends the validity of the renewable Community licence to "up to 10 years", introduces the (comitology) regulatory procedure with scrutiny to care for future necessary adaptations of the validity of the Community licence, and also amends accordingly the provisions concerning the verification of conditions for the issuing and renewal of the licence.

As for the recording of the serial number of the driver attestation in the national electronic register, the common position deviates from the Commission proposal and leaves this provision optional.

In order to avoid possible falsifications of these documents, the Council decided to amend Annexes I and II by adding a series of security features, of which at least two have to be used within the documents. The European Parliament decided to follow the Commission's approach and did not adopt amendments on this issue.

Cabotage : in order to avoid unladen journeys on Community roads, the common position introduces an additional provision allowing hauliers to carry out cabotage operations in transited Member States. Such operations will be limited to one per transited Member State within three days following the unladen entry into the territory of that Member State. The overall number of operations, however, will still be limited to three within seven days.

The Council also re-introduces certain safeguard measures which are currently in force and which allow Member States, following approval by the Commission, to introduce protective measures in case of serious disturbance of the national transport market in a geographical area due to or aggravated by cabotage. The common position also obliges the Commission to assess, in a future report on the state of the Community road transport market, whether the progress in the harmonisation of certain rules (i.e. enforcement and road user charges) allows further opening of the domestic transport markets, including cabotage.

The European Parliament accepted the Commission's proposal of allowing three consecutive

cabotage operations within seven days. Contrary to the approach taken by the Council and the Commission, the European Parliament voted in favour of a complete liberalisation of cabotage operations as of 1 January 2014.

Cooperation between Member States : following the Commission proposal, the common position obliges Member States to exchange information via the national contact points. Member States are also obliged to enter into their national register of road transport undertakings all serious infringements of Community transport legislation which have led to the imposition of a penalty. Moreover, the Council decided to enter into the national registers any temporary or permanent withdrawal of the Community licence or of the certified true copies. The latter entries will remain in the data base for two years.

The European Parliament decided to follow the Commission proposal and did not adopt amendments on this issue.

Sanctioning of infringements : the common position as agreed by the Council follows to a large extent the Commission's approach towards serious infringements. However, the Council agreed to leave the weighing of repeated minor infringements to the discretion of the Member States. The common position also introduces the obligation for the competent authority of the Member State of establishment of the haulier to communicate to the competent authority of the Member State in which an infringement was ascertained whether and which penalties have been imposed. The timeframe foreseen for this communication is fixed within two months after the final decision on the matter has been taken.

As regards the procedure to the followed by the Member State which ascertains a serious infringement committed by a non-resident haulier, the common position provides a delay of two months (instead of one month) to communicate the information (in minimum standard format) to the Member State of establishment. Moreover, the text does not contain any obligation for the Member State of establishment of the haulier to report on the follow-up. The European Parliament also decided against the inclusion of provisions concerning repeated minor infringement. Moreover, it voted in favour of a provision allowing the imposition of fines as a possible penalty.

The Council common position integrated fully or in principle amendments concerning a modified definition of the exception for the carriage of mail and the limitation of details contained in the evidence to be produced for the international carriage in connection with cabotage operations. The amendments not included in the common position concern:

a recital on the relation to Directive 92/106/EEC on combined transport; an addition to the definition of cabotage; 1 January 2009 as a fixed date of application of this Regulation; the reference to the Directive on the posting of workers as rules applicable to cabotage; the possibility for Member States to regulate cross trade.

Documents
2009/01/09
   CSL - Council statement on its position
Documents
2009/01/08
   CSL - Council position published
Details

The common position adopted by the Council, by qualified majority, integrated as such or in principle a certain number of the amendments adopted by the European Parliament, all of which were also acceptable as such or in principle for the Commission

The key policy issues are as follows:

Community licence and driver attestation : the Commission proposal foresees the issuing of a Community licence for a renewable period of 5 years. The common position therefore extends the validity of the renewable Community licence to "up to 10 years", introduces the (comitology) regulatory procedure with scrutiny to care for future necessary adaptations of the validity of the Community licence, and also amends accordingly the provisions concerning the verification of conditions for the issuing and renewal of the licence.

As for the recording of the serial number of the driver attestation in the national electronic register, the common position deviates from the Commission proposal and leaves this provision optional.

In order to avoid possible falsifications of these documents, the Council decided to amend Annexes I and II by adding a series of security features, of which at least two have to be used within the documents. The European Parliament decided to follow the Commission's approach and did not adopt amendments on this issue.

Cabotage : in order to avoid unladen journeys on Community roads, the common position introduces an additional provision allowing hauliers to carry out cabotage operations in transited Member States. Such operations will be limited to one per transited Member State within three days following the unladen entry into the territory of that Member State. The overall number of operations, however, will still be limited to three within seven days.

The Council also re-introduces certain safeguard measures which are currently in force and which allow Member States, following approval by the Commission, to introduce protective measures in case of serious disturbance of the national transport market in a geographical area due to or aggravated by cabotage. The common position also obliges the Commission to assess, in a future report on the state of the Community road transport market, whether the progress in the harmonisation of certain rules (i.e. enforcement and road user charges) allows further opening of the domestic transport markets, including cabotage.

The European Parliament accepted the Commission's proposal of allowing three consecutive

cabotage operations within seven days. Contrary to the approach taken by the Council and the Commission, the European Parliament voted in favour of a complete liberalisation of cabotage operations as of 1 January 2014.

Cooperation between Member States : following the Commission proposal, the common position obliges Member States to exchange information via the national contact points. Member States are also obliged to enter into their national register of road transport undertakings all serious infringements of Community transport legislation which have led to the imposition of a penalty. Moreover, the Council decided to enter into the national registers any temporary or permanent withdrawal of the Community licence or of the certified true copies. The latter entries will remain in the data base for two years.

The European Parliament decided to follow the Commission proposal and did not adopt amendments on this issue.

Sanctioning of infringements : the common position as agreed by the Council follows to a large extent the Commission's approach towards serious infringements. However, the Council agreed to leave the weighing of repeated minor infringements to the discretion of the Member States. The common position also introduces the obligation for the competent authority of the Member State of establishment of the haulier to communicate to the competent authority of the Member State in which an infringement was ascertained whether and which penalties have been imposed. The timeframe foreseen for this communication is fixed within two months after the final decision on the matter has been taken.

As regards the procedure to the followed by the Member State which ascertains a serious infringement committed by a non-resident haulier, the common position provides a delay of two months (instead of one month) to communicate the information (in minimum standard format) to the Member State of establishment. Moreover, the text does not contain any obligation for the Member State of establishment of the haulier to report on the follow-up. The European Parliament also decided against the inclusion of provisions concerning repeated minor infringement. Moreover, it voted in favour of a provision allowing the imposition of fines as a possible penalty.

The Council common position integrated fully or in principle amendments concerning a modified definition of the exception for the carriage of mail and the limitation of details contained in the evidence to be produced for the international carriage in connection with cabotage operations. The amendments not included in the common position concern:

a recital on the relation to Directive 92/106/EEC on combined transport; an addition to the definition of cabotage; 1 January 2009 as a fixed date of application of this Regulation; the reference to the Directive on the posting of workers as rules applicable to cabotage; the possibility for Member States to regulate cross trade.

Documents
2008/06/12
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/06/12
   CSL - Council Meeting
2008/05/21
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2008/05/21
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 494 votes to 133 with 46 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for access to the international road haulage market (recast). The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Mathieu GROSCH (EPP-ED, BE) on behalf of the Committee on Transport and Tourism.

The main amendments - adopted in first reading of the codecision procedure - are as follows: -the Regulation shall apply to cabotage operations. It will not apply to specified types of carriage and unladen journeys made in conjunction with such carriage, since they are exempt from the Community licensing scheme;

- the definition of cabotage operations, namely "national carriage for hire or reward carried out on a temporary basis in a host Member State", must refer to the conditions set out in Chapter III, to prevent the use of other interpretations of 'carriage on a temporary basis'. The incoming or outgoing carriage of goods by road as one leg of a combined transport journey under the conditions laid down in Directive 92/106/EEC does not fall under the definition of cabotage;

-the Regulation deals with serious infringements and not with repeated minor infringements;

-'cross-trade' means international transport operations carried out by a haulier between two host Member States neither of which is the haulier's state of residence. Where cross-trade between two Member States is carried out by a haulier on a regular, continuous and/or systematic basis, one of the host Member States may call for the application of the working and employment conditions applicable to their own national hauliers;

-cabotage should be authorised with effect from the first unloading, even of a part-load, during an international carriage. Furthermore, cabotage operations may also be carried out in a Member State through which the vehicle has to travel after unloading in the Member State of delivery during an international carriage, provided that the shortest homeward journey transits through that Member State and is carried out within seven days of the unloading in the country of delivery;

- a new Article specifies that the restrictions on the number and duration of cabotage operations shall gradually be lifted. Two years after this Regulation enters into force, the number of cabotage operations mentioned above shall be increased to seven. On 1 January 2014, all restrictions on the number and duration of cabotage operations shall be lifted;

-in order to restrict unnecessary bureaucracy, it needs to be ensured that Member States do not request specific items of evidence. In this context, MEPs have introduced a new provision stipulating that Member States shall not require an additional specific document or duplicate documents proving that the terms and conditions laid down in the Regulation have been met. By 1 January 2010, the Commission shall draw up, in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, a single harmonised model for a waybill valid throughout the EU for international haulage, national haulage and cabotage haulage. The Member States and the Commission shall ensure that the provisions laid down in other conventions concluded with third countries are brought into line with the provisions laid down in this Regulation;

-the provisions of this Regulation shall not prevent a Member State from authorising goods hauliers from one or more other Member States to carry out on its territory an unlimited number of cabotage operations, or a number in excess of that referred to in the Regulation, with no time limit or with a longer time limit than that referred to in the Regulation for the last unloading. Authorisations granted before the entry into force of this Regulation shall continue to apply. Member States shall inform the Commission of existing authorisations and of authorisations they grant after the entry into force of the Regulation;

-the incoming or outgoing carriage of goods by road as one leg of a combined transport journey under the conditions laid down in Directive 92/106/EEC does not fall under the definition of cabotage.

-the posting of workers as set out under Directive 96/71/EC is reflected in the articles of the Regulation;

-a new Article states that after the lifting of the restrictions referred to in the text, in the event of serious disturbance of the national transport market in a given geographical area due to or aggravated by cabotage, any Member State may refer the matter to the Commission with a view to the adoption of safeguard measures and shall inform and notify it of the measures it intends to take as regards resident carriers. The terms 'serious disturbance of the national transport market in a given geographical area' and 'geographical area' are defined.

-the Commission shall examine the situation, on the basis in particular of the latest quarterly data and, after consulting the Advisory Committee set up by Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 3916/90, shall decide within one month of receipt of the relevant Member State's request whether or not safeguard measures are necessary and shall adopt them if they are necessary. Such measures may involve the temporary exclusion of the area concerned from the scope of the Regulation. The measures introduced in accordance with this Article shall remain in force for a period not exceeding six months, renewable once within the same limits of validity. If the Commission decides to take safeguard measures concerning one or more Member States, the competent authorities of the Member States involved shall be required to take measures of equivalent scope in respect of resident carriers and shall inform the Commission thereof. These measures shall be applied at the latest as from the same date as the safeguard measures decided on by the Commission. Any Member State may submit a Commission decision to the Council within 30 days of its notification. The Council, acting by a qualified majority within 30 days of referral by a Member State or, if there are referrals by several Member States, of the first referral, may take a different decision. The time limits shall apply to the Council's decision. The competent authorities of the Member States concerned shall be required to take measures of equivalent scope in respect of resident carriers and shall inform the Commission thereof. If the Council takes no decision, the Commission decision shall become final. Where the Commission considers that the measures need to be prolonged, it shall submit a proposal to the Council, which shall take a decision by qualified majority.

-minor infringements should not be covered by the Regulation as they are interpreted and dealt with in different ways in Member States. To ensure that the sanctions have an appropriate effect, MEPs believe that the Regulation should make explicit provision for fines as a possible sanction. These sanctions shall be determined, once a final decision has been issued and after all the legal possibilities for review open to the haulier have been exhausted. Where a serious infringement is ascertained, the competent authorities of the Member State of establishment shall decide what sanction to impose on the haulier concerned. This sanction can range from a warning to the temporary or permanent withdrawal of the Community licence;

-the decision on the temporary withdrawal of any document (Community licence, driver attestation, certified copy) shall stipulate: (a) the period of temporary withdrawal; (b) the conditions for ending the temporary withdrawal; (c) the cases in which the Community licence is to be permanently withdrawn, because the conditions laid down pursuant to point (b) have not been satisfied during the period laid down pursuant to point (a);

-the data that are to be entered in the databases of national electronic registers should be obtained after final decisions have been taken. Only serious infringements of Community legislation should be recorded in national registers;

Lastly, the Regulation should apply from 1 January 2009.

Documents
2008/05/20
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2008/04/07
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council held a public policy debate on three legislative proposals that seek to modernise, replace and merge legislation governing road transport operators and access to the road transport markets (see COD/2007/0097 and COD/2007/0098 ).

Ministers were invited to agree in principle to the outline of the presidency compromise package on the key elements of two of the three proposals.

The Council broadly supported the presidency compromise as a good basis for further work on these proposals and invited Coreper to pursue examination of the outstanding issues with the objective of reaching a political agreement on all these proposals at the Transport, Telecommunications and Energy Council in June 2008. The presidency compromise focuses in particular on two main issues, cabotage and national electronic registers.

All delegations expressed their support in principle for the Commission proposal on access to the international road haulage market. Following the work carried out within the Council, some provisions of the Commission's proposal were adapted in order to reach consensus on most parts of the draft regulation. These modifications particularly concern scope and definitions, the format of the Community licence, certified copies and the driver attestation, mutual assistance and penalties, and a list of security features to avoid manipulation and forgery of the Community licence and driver attestation documents.

A majority of delegations supported the presidency compromise on cabotage. This compromise follows the Commission's proposal allowing for up to 3 transport operations consecutive to an international journey within 7 days. In addition, the Commission will be invited to assess, in a report, whether progress in the harmonisation of certain rules (i.e. enforcement and taxation) allows for a further opening of domestic transport markets, including in the field of cabotage.

In addition, several delegations asked to consider the possibility of including in the text additional cabotage operations on the return trip if the lorry takes the shortest route back.

Documents
2008/04/07
   CSL - Council Meeting
2008/03/12
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Documents
2008/02/12
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2008/02/12
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Documents
2008/01/22
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
Details

The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report by Mathieu GROSCH (EPP-ED, BE ) amending, under the first reading of the codecision procedure, the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for access to the international road haulage market (recast).

The main amendments made by the committee are as follows:

- MEPs wish to clarify that this Regulation shall apply to cabotage operations. In addition, they specify that this Regulation shall not apply to the following types of carriage and unladen journeys made in conjunction with such carriage, since they are exempt from the Community licensing scheme;

- the definition of cabotage operations, namely “national carriage for hire or reward carried out on a temporary basis in a host Member State”, must refer to the conditions set out in Chapter III, to prevent the use of other interpretations of ‘carriage on a temporary basis’. The incoming or outgoing carriage of goods by road as one leg of a combined transport journey under the conditions laid down in Directive 92/106/EEC does not fall under the definition of cabotage;

- MEPs have deleted a provision which defined infringements which lead to the loss of good repute as “a serious infringement or repeated minor infringements of Community road transport legislation”;

- ‘cross-trade’ means international transport operations carried out by a haulier between two host Member States neither of which is the haulier’s state of residence. Where cross-trade between two Member States is carried out by a haulier on a regular, continuous and/or systematic basis, one of the host Member States may call for the application of the working and employment conditions applicable to their own national hauliers;

- according to MEPs, cabotage should be authorised with effect from the first unloading, even of a part-load, during an international carriage. Furthermore, cabotage operations may also be carried out in a Member State through which the vehicle has to travel after unloading in the Member State of delivery during an international carriage, provided that the shortest homeward journey transits through that Member State and is carried out within seven days of the unloading in the country of delivery;

- a new Article specifies that the restrictions on the number and duration of cabotage operations shall gradually be lifted. Two years after this Regulation enters into force, the number of cabotage operations mentioned in the Regulation shall be increased to seven. On 1 January 2014, all restrictions on the number and duration of cabotage operations shall be lifted;

- in order to restrict unnecessary bureaucracy, it needs to be ensured that Member States do not request specific items of evidence. In this context, MEPs have introduced a new provision stipulating that Member States shall not require an additional specific document or duplicate documents proving that the terms and conditions laid down in the Regulation have been met. By 1 January 2010, the Commission shall draw up, in accordance with the regulatory and monitoring procedure, a single harmonised model for a waybill valid throughout the European Union for international haulage, national haulage and cabotage haulage. The Member States and the Commission shall ensure that the provisions laid down in other conventions concluded with third countries are brought into line with the provisions laid down in this Regulation;

- the provisions of this Regulation shall not prevent a Member State from authorising goods hauliers from one or more other Member States to carry out on its territory an unlimited number of cabotage operations, or a number in excess of that referred to in the Regulation, with no time limit or with a longer time limit than that referred to in the Regulation for the last unloading. Authorisations granted before the entry into force of this Regulation shall continue to apply. Member States shall inform the Commission of existing authorisations and of authorisations they grant after the entry into force of this Regulation;

- Recital 13 explains that the Posted Workers Directive applies to cabotage operations. MEPs believe that this should also be reflected in the articles of the Regulation;

- minor infringements should not be covered by the Regulation as they are interpreted and dealt with in different ways in Member States. To ensure that the sanctions have an appropriate effect, MEPs believe that the Regulation should make explicit provision for fines as a possible sanction. These sanctions shall be determined, once a final decision has been issued and after all the legal possibilities for review open to the haulier have been exhausted. Where a serious infringement is ascertained, the competent authorities of the Member State of establishment shall decide what sanction to impose on the haulier concerned. This sanction can range from a warning to the temporary or permanent withdrawal of the Community licence;

- the decision on the temporary withdrawal of any document (Community licence, driver attestation, certified copy) shall stipulate: (a) the period of temporary withdrawal; (b) the conditions for ending the temporary withdrawal; (c) the cases in which the Community licence is to be permanently withdrawn, because the conditions laid down pursuant to point (b) have not been satisfied during the period laid down pursuant to point (a);

- the data that are to be entered in the databases of national electronic registers should be obtained after final decisions have been taken. Only serious infringements of Community legislation should be recorded in national registers;

Lastly, the Regulation should apply from 1 January 2009.

2008/01/08
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2007/11/29
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2007/11/29
   CSL - Council Meeting
2007/11/05
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2007/09/24
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2007/07/13
   EP - GROSCH Mathieu (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2007/05/23
   EC - Legislative proposal
Details

PURPOSE: to consolidate and merge Regulation (EEC) No 881/92 and (EEC) No 3118/93 on access to the road transport market , in order to simplify current provisions.

PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

CONTENT: this proposal is being presented alongside two related proposals all of which are seeking to modernise provisions governing road transport operators and access to the road transport market. The package of proposals includes:

Replacing Directive 96/26/EC on admission to the occupation of road transport operator , with a new Regulation. (For a summary of the proposal refer to: COD/2007/0098 ). Merging Regulations (EEC) No 881/92 and (EEC) No 3118/93 on access to the road transport market. (The subject of this summary) Merging Regulations (EEC) No 684/92 and (EC) No 12/98 on access to the market of coach and bus services.” (For a summary of the proposal refer to: COD/2007/0097

Experience shows that certain measures of the current legislative framework are unequally applied thanks in large part to unclear and incomplete legal provisions. Road hauliers have to cope with different national rules and a degree of legal uncertainty, which may entail additional costs when they operate in several Member States. Following an impact assessment a number of challenges to the current legislative framework have been identified and include:

- Scope : particularly concerning the transport of Community hauliers to and from third countries;

- Implementation : particularly concerning the concept of temporary cabotage. The Member States continue to implement diverging rules that are difficult to enforce and which impose additional administrative burdens on industry;

- Exchange of information : an ineffective exchange of information between the Member States results in undertakings facing few, if any, administrative sanctions;

- Lack of standardisation : the lack of uniformity vis-à-vis control documents such as the Community licence, certified copies and driver attestation creates problems during roadside checks and frequently leads to considerable time losses for operators.

The purpose of this proposal, therefore, is to enhance the clarity and enforceability of the current rules by consolidating and merging the two Regulation dealing with access to the road transport market. The modifications being proposed can be summarised as follows:

- a simpler and clearer definition of the term “cabotage”. The new definition is expected to be easier to enforce and will allow for up to three transport operations consecutive to an international journey and within seven days. The holder will be obliged to keep documents in the vehicles such as consignment letters which show the date and place of arrivals/departures;

- a simplified and standardised Community licence, certified copies and driver attestations in a bid to reduce the administrative burden and delays at road side checks;

- enhanced legal provisions that oblige a Member State to act, when requested to so by another Member State, in cases where a haulier commits an infringement in any EU Member State.

The proposal contributes to the simplification of the current legislative framework. Obsolete measures have been abolished and the content, presentation and formulation has been re-examined in order to avoid ambiguous interpretations.

2007/05/23
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2007/05/23
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2007/05/22
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to consolidate and merge Regulation (EEC) No 881/92 and (EEC) No 3118/93 on access to the road transport market , in order to simplify current provisions.

PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

CONTENT: this proposal is being presented alongside two related proposals all of which are seeking to modernise provisions governing road transport operators and access to the road transport market. The package of proposals includes:

Replacing Directive 96/26/EC on admission to the occupation of road transport operator , with a new Regulation. (For a summary of the proposal refer to: COD/2007/0098 ). Merging Regulations (EEC) No 881/92 and (EEC) No 3118/93 on access to the road transport market. (The subject of this summary) Merging Regulations (EEC) No 684/92 and (EC) No 12/98 on access to the market of coach and bus services.” (For a summary of the proposal refer to: COD/2007/0097

Experience shows that certain measures of the current legislative framework are unequally applied thanks in large part to unclear and incomplete legal provisions. Road hauliers have to cope with different national rules and a degree of legal uncertainty, which may entail additional costs when they operate in several Member States. Following an impact assessment a number of challenges to the current legislative framework have been identified and include:

- Scope : particularly concerning the transport of Community hauliers to and from third countries;

- Implementation : particularly concerning the concept of temporary cabotage. The Member States continue to implement diverging rules that are difficult to enforce and which impose additional administrative burdens on industry;

- Exchange of information : an ineffective exchange of information between the Member States results in undertakings facing few, if any, administrative sanctions;

- Lack of standardisation : the lack of uniformity vis-à-vis control documents such as the Community licence, certified copies and driver attestation creates problems during roadside checks and frequently leads to considerable time losses for operators.

The purpose of this proposal, therefore, is to enhance the clarity and enforceability of the current rules by consolidating and merging the two Regulation dealing with access to the road transport market. The modifications being proposed can be summarised as follows:

- a simpler and clearer definition of the term “cabotage”. The new definition is expected to be easier to enforce and will allow for up to three transport operations consecutive to an international journey and within seven days. The holder will be obliged to keep documents in the vehicles such as consignment letters which show the date and place of arrivals/departures;

- a simplified and standardised Community licence, certified copies and driver attestations in a bid to reduce the administrative burden and delays at road side checks;

- enhanced legal provisions that oblige a Member State to act, when requested to so by another Member State, in cases where a haulier commits an infringement in any EU Member State.

The proposal contributes to the simplification of the current legislative framework. Obsolete measures have been abolished and the content, presentation and formulation has been re-examined in order to avoid ambiguous interpretations.

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Grosch A6-0038/2008 - am. 18 #

2008/05/21 Outcome: +: 378, -: 294, 0: 11
DE PL IT NL RO IE LT LV HU BE SK SI FI CZ BG LU ES CY AT MT EE DK SE PT EL GB FR
Total
92
52
56
22
23
11
13
8
22
19
11
7
13
22
18
6
50
6
16
4
5
14
16
21
19
66
71
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
250
2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
91

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1
2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: UEN UEN
37

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4
icon: NI NI
28
2

Italy NI

Against (1)

3

Slovakia NI

2

Czechia NI

1

Bulgaria NI

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

6
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Poland IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

France IND/DEM

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: PSE PSE
184

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

Against (1)

2

Estonia PSE

2

Rapport Grosch A6-0038/2008 - am. 4/1 #

2008/05/21 Outcome: +: 423, -: 232, 0: 20
DE ES PL HU AT PT RO NL SK IT BE LV IE CZ DK MT LU SE SI BG FI EE LT CY EL GB FR
Total
89
50
51
22
17
21
23
23
9
52
19
8
11
22
14
4
6
17
7
18
13
4
11
6
20
66
72
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
248

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

3
icon: PSE PSE
181

Slovakia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Estonia PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3
icon: UEN UEN
36

Ireland UEN

Against (2)

4

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: NI NI
27
2

Austria NI

2

Italy NI

Against (1)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

3

United Kingdom NI

6
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Poland IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

France IND/DEM

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
90
2

Hungary ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Grosch A6-0038/2008 - am. 4/2 #

2008/05/21 Outcome: +: 498, -: 150, 0: 15
DE ES IT NL HU RO PT AT CZ FI BE BG SK SI LU EE DK CY MT IE PL SE LT LV FR EL GB
Total
90
48
54
24
22
21
19
17
20
13
18
17
11
7
6
5
14
6
4
11
48
15
11
8
70
20
64
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
241

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
2

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

3
icon: PSE PSE
179

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Malta PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
87
2

Austria ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
2

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2
icon: NI NI
27

Italy NI

Against (1)

3

Austria NI

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

2

Bulgaria NI

3

Slovakia NI

2
2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

6
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

3

Sweden IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
35

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2

Rapport Grosch A6-0038/2008 - am. 48 #

2008/05/21 Outcome: +: 492, -: 176, 0: 15
DE FR ES PT HU EL CZ AT IT BE NL RO SK DK CY MT LU FI SI LV BG SE EE PL IE LT GB
Total
92
72
49
21
22
20
22
17
56
18
25
23
11
12
6
4
6
13
7
8
18
17
5
49
11
13
66
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
251

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2
icon: PSE PSE
186

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34
2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
29

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Slovakia NI

Against (2)

2

Bulgaria NI

3
2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

6
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
20

France IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

3

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

3

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
90
2

Hungary ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Grosch A6-0038/2008 - résolution #

2008/05/21 Outcome: +: 494, -: 133, 0: 46
DE ES IT PL RO HU NL BG EL AT PT BE CZ IE FI SK LV SI DK LU EE CY LT MT SE GB FR
Total
91
48
54
52
22
22
25
18
20
17
20
19
21
11
13
11
8
6
12
6
5
6
12
2
17
65
70
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
247

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
181

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
87
2

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: UEN UEN
37

Latvia UEN

3

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: NI NI
29

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

3
2

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

Against (2)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2

Recommandation 2ème lecture GROSCH A6-0211/2009 - AMS 2-12 #

2009/04/23 Outcome: +: 610, -: 21, 0: 5
DE FR IT GB ES PL RO BE HU PT CZ NL SE BG EL IE DK LT SK LV FI SI EE AT LU CY MT
Total
94
64
50
64
37
37
29
23
20
20
22
21
17
15
19
12
12
10
10
9
11
7
6
18
5
3
1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
232

Denmark PPE-DE

1
2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Finland PPE-DE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

1
icon: PSE PSE
185

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
77

Spain ALDE

1
2
3

Sweden ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
33

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

Italy NI

2

United Kingdom NI

6

Poland NI

1

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

1

Austria NI

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

3

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Recommandation 2ème lecture GROSCH A6-0211/2009 - AM 15 #

2009/04/23 Outcome: -: 485, +: 140, 0: 6
IE PL NL LT LV BG MT EE CY SI SE FI IT DK LU SK AT BE HU PT EL CZ RO ES FR GB DE
Total
12
37
20
9
9
15
1
6
3
7
17
11
50
12
4
10
18
23
19
20
19
21
29
37
63
65
94
icon: ALDE ALDE
75

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

1

Belgium ALDE

Against (1)

3
2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: UEN UEN
33

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

Poland NI

1

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovakia NI

1

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Czechia NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (2)

6
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: PSE PSE
183

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

2

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
232

Netherlands PPE-DE

Against (1)

4

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Finland PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Recommandation 2ème lecture GROSCH A6-0211/2009 - AM 16 #

2009/04/23 Outcome: -: 487, +: 137, 0: 7
NL IE PL LV LT FI CY EE BG SI SE DK LU IT SK BE HU AT PT EL CZ RO ES FR GB DE
Total
21
12
38
9
9
11
3
6
15
7
17
12
5
50
10
23
19
18
19
19
21
29
36
63
65
94
icon: ALDE ALDE
76
3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

3

Belgium ALDE

Against (1)

3
2

Austria ALDE

1

Spain ALDE

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
22

Poland NI

1

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovakia NI

1

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Czechia NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (2)

6
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: PSE PSE
183

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Estonia PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
230

Netherlands PPE-DE

Against (1)

4

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Finland PPE-DE

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Recommandation 2ème lecture GROSCH A6-0211/2009 - AM 17 #

2009/04/23 Outcome: -: 497, +: 121, 0: 18
NL IE LT LV BG CY MT EE SE FI SI LU PL DK SK IT BE AT HU PT EL CZ RO ES FR GB DE
Total
21
12
10
9
15
3
1
6
17
11
6
5
38
12
10
50
23
18
20
20
19
22
29
36
64
65
94
icon: ALDE ALDE
76
3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

1

Belgium ALDE

Against (1)

3

Austria ALDE

1
2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

Poland NI

1

Slovakia NI

1

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Czechia NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

6
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

Against (1)

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: PSE PSE
184

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Finland PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
232

Netherlands PPE-DE

Against (1)

4

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Recommandation 2ème lecturet GROSCH A6-0211/2009 - AM 18 #

2009/04/23 Outcome: -: 485, +: 108, 0: 40
NL IE CY SE LT FI EE BG DK SI LV LU SK IT PL BE AT HU CZ EL PT RO ES FR GB DE
Total
20
12
3
17
10
11
6
15
12
6
9
5
10
49
38
23
18
20
22
19
20
29
36
64
65
94
icon: ALDE ALDE
74

Netherlands ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Belgium ALDE

Against (1)

3

Austria ALDE

1
2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
23

Slovakia NI

1

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

1

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Czechia NI

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Ireland UEN

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: PSE PSE
183

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Estonia PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
232

Netherlands PPE-DE

Against (1)

4

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Finland PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Recommandation 2ème lecture GROSCH A6-0211/2009 - AM 13 #

2009/04/23 Outcome: +: 540, -: 75, 0: 18
DE FR GB ES RO PL IT HU BE PT BG CZ SE LT SK LV FI EL AT SI NL DK EE IE LU CY MT
Total
94
64
64
36
28
38
50
20
23
20
15
22
17
10
10
9
11
19
17
6
21
12
6
12
5
3
1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
231
2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Finland PPE-DE

2

Netherlands PPE-DE

4

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

1
icon: PSE PSE
183

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Ireland PSE

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
75

Spain ALDE

1
2

Sweden ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (2)

6

Poland NI

1

Italy NI

2

Belgium NI

3

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

1

Austria NI

2
icon: UEN UEN
34

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Recommandation 2ème lecturet GROSCH A6-0211/2009 - AM 14 #

2009/04/23 Outcome: -: 479, +: 113, 0: 36
IE NL PL LT LV CY MT EE FI BG DK SI LU SE SK AT CZ HU BE IT EL PT RO ES FR GB DE
Total
12
22
34
10
9
2
1
6
11
15
12
5
5
17
10
18
20
20
23
50
19
20
29
37
64
64
93
icon: ALDE ALDE
75

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ALDE

Against (1)

4

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

4

Sweden ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

1
2

Belgium ALDE

Against (1)

3

Spain ALDE

1
icon: UEN UEN
32

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

Poland NI

1

Slovakia NI

1

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Czechia NI

1

Belgium NI

3

Italy NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

6
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: PSE PSE
184

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Finland PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
228

Netherlands PPE-DE

Against (1)

4

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Recommandation 2ème lecture GROSCH A6-0211/2009 - AM 1/1 #

2009/04/23 Outcome: +: 573, -: 40, 0: 17
DE FR GB IT ES PL RO BE HU NL BG PT SE EL LT IE FI SK CZ LV DK AT SI EE LU CY MT
Total
92
64
63
49
37
36
28
23
20
22
15
20
17
19
10
12
12
10
21
9
12
18
6
6
5
3
1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
230
2

Finland PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

1
icon: PSE PSE
182

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Spain ALDE

1
2

Sweden ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Lithuania UEN

2

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
22

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

6

Italy NI

2

Poland NI

1

Belgium NI

3

Slovakia NI

1

Austria NI

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Poland IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Recommandation 2ème lecture GROSCH A6-0211/2009 - AM 1/2 #

2009/04/23 Outcome: +: 457, -: 158, 0: 11
DE FR ES GB RO HU BE PT IT EL SK CZ DK LU BG AT SI EE FI MT IE CY LV PL LT SE NL
Total
93
63
36
61
29
20
22
19
50
19
10
22
12
5
15
18
6
6
11
1
12
3
9
36
10
16
22
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
226

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE-DE

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3
2
4

Netherlands PPE-DE

4
icon: PSE PSE
181

Slovakia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Malta PSE

1

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

6

Belgium NI

3

Italy NI

2

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

2

Poland NI

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Greece IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

Against (1)

2

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2
icon: UEN UEN
34

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Spain ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Belgium ALDE

For (1)

3

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3
AmendmentsDossier
15 2007/0099(COD)
2009/02/26 TRAN 15 amendments...
source: PE-420.083

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0265/COM_COM(2007)0265_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0265/COM_COM(2007)0265_EN.pdf
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0635/COM_SEC(2007)0635_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0635/COM_SEC(2007)0635_EN.pdf
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0673/COM_COM(2008)0673_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0673/COM_COM(2008)0673_EN.pdf
docs/14/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0305/COM_COM(2009)0305_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0305/COM_COM(2009)0305_EN.pdf
docs/19
date
2014-08-13T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2014)0222 title: COM(2014)0222
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
docs/19
date
2014-08-14T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2014)0222 title: COM(2014)0222
type
Contribution
body
PT_PARLIAMENT
events/0
date
2007-05-22T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/9
date
2009-01-08T00:00:00
type
Council position published
body
CSL
docs
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11788%2F08&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 11788/1/2008
summary
events/12
date
2009-04-02T00:00:00
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0211_EN.html title: A6-0211/2009
events/15
date
2009-11-14T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
summary
docs
events/18
date
2009-11-14T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
summary
docs
events/18/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:300:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:300:SOM:EN:HTML
links/National parliaments/url
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2007&number=0099&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2007&number=0099&appLng=EN
docs/0
date
2007-05-23T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/1
date
2007-05-23T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/2
date
2007-05-23T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/2
date
2007-11-05T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE396.395 title: PE396.395
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0636/COM_SEC(2007)0636_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0636/COM_SEC(2007)0636_EN.pdf
docs/3
date
2007-11-05T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE396.395 title: PE396.395
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/3
date
2008-01-08T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE398.390 title: PE398.390
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE396.395
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE396.395
docs/4
date
2008-01-08T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE398.390 title: PE398.390
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/4
date
2008-02-12T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0038_EN.html title: A6-0038/2008
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE398.390
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE398.390
docs/5
date
2008-02-12T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0038_EN.html title: A6-0038/2008
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs/5
date
2008-03-12T00:00:00
docs
url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0489)(documentyear:2008)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES0489/2008
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0038_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0038_EN.html
docs/6
date
2008-03-12T00:00:00
docs
url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0489)(documentyear:2008)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES0489/2008
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
body
ESC
docs/6
date
2008-06-12T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2008)3593/2
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0489)(documentyear:2008)(documentlanguage:EN)
New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0489)(documentyear:2008)(documentlanguage:EN)
docs/6/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14664&j=0&l=en
docs/7
date
2008-06-12T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2008)3593/2
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/8
date
2009-01-12T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Commission communication on Council's position
body
EC
docs/8
date
2009-01-09T00:00:00
docs
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11788%2F08&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 11788/1/2008
summary
type
Council position
body
CSL
docs/9
date
2009-01-29T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE418.415 title: PE418.415
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/10
date
2009-01-12T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Commission communication on Council's position
body
EC
docs/10
date
2009-02-26T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE420.083 title: PE420.083
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0673/COM_COM(2008)0673_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0673/COM_COM(2008)0673_EN.pdf
docs/11
date
2009-01-29T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE418.415 title: PE418.415
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/11
date
2009-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0211_EN.html title: A6-0211/2009
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs/11/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE418.415
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE418.415
docs/12
date
2009-02-26T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE420.083 title: PE420.083
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/12/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE420.083
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE420.083
docs/13
date
2009-04-02T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0211_EN.html title: A6-0211/2009
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs/13/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0211_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0211_EN.html
events/0
date
2007-09-24T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/0
date
2007-05-23T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/1
date
2007-09-24T00:00:00
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
events/2
date
2008-01-22T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
summary
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/3
date
2008-01-22T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
summary
events/3
date
2008-02-12T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0038_EN.html title: A6-0038/2008
events/4
date
2008-02-12T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0038_EN.html title: A6-0038/2008
events/5
date
2008-05-20T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080520&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080520&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080520&type=CRE
events/6
date
2008-05-20T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080520&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/7
date
2008-05-21T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0218_EN.html title: T6-0218/2008
summary
events/8
date
2008-05-21T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0218_EN.html title: T6-0218/2008
summary
events/9
date
2009-01-09T00:00:00
type
Council position published
body
CSL
docs
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11788%2F08&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 11788/1/2008
summary
events/10
date
2009-04-22T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090422&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090422&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090422&type=CRE
events/11
date
2009-04-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0277_EN.html title: T6-0277/2009
summary
events/11/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0277_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0277_EN.html
events/12
date
2009-04-02T00:00:00
type
Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0211_EN.html title: A6-0211/2009
events/13
date
2009-04-22T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090422&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/14
date
2009-04-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0277_EN.html title: T6-0277/2009
summary
procedure/instrument/1
Repealing Directive 2006/94/EC 2004/0017(COD) Amended by 2017/0123(COD)
procedure/instrument/1
Repealing Regulations (EEC) No 881/92 and (EEC) No 3118/93 Repealing Directive 2006/94/EC 2004/0017(COD) Amended by 2017/0123(COD)
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
rapporteur
name: GROSCH Mathieu date: 2009-01-19T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2009-01-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GROSCH Mathieu group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
rapporteur
name: GROSCH Mathieu date: 2007-07-13T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2007-07-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GROSCH Mathieu group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0635/COM_SEC(2007)0635_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0635/COM_SEC(2007)0635_EN.pdf
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-38&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0038_EN.html
docs/6/body
EC
docs/11/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-211&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0211_EN.html
docs/12/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0305/COM_COM(2009)0305_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0305/COM_COM(2009)0305_EN.pdf
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-38&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0038_EN.html
events/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-218
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0218_EN.html
events/12/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-211&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0211_EN.html
events/14/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-277
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0277_EN.html
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0635/COM_SEC(2007)0635_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0635/COM_SEC(2007)0635_EN.pdf
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0636/COM_SEC(2007)0636_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0636/COM_SEC(2007)0636_EN.pdf
docs/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0673/COM_COM(2008)0673_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0673/COM_COM(2008)0673_EN.pdf
activities
  • date: 2007-05-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0265/COM_COM(2007)0265_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0265 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52007PC0265:EN body: EC commission: DG: Energy and Transport Commissioner: TAJANI Antonio type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2007-09-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2007-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2835 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2835*&MEET_DATE=29/11/2007 type: Debate in Council title: 2835 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2007-11-29T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2008-01-22T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2007-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-02-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-38&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0038/2008 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2007-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2861 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2861*&MEET_DATE=07/04/2008 type: Debate in Council title: 2861 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2008-04-07T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2008-05-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080520&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-05-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14664&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-218 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0218/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-06-12T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2877
  • date: 2009-01-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11788%2F08&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Council position published title: 11788/1/2008 body: CSL type: Council position published
  • date: 2009-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2007-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu
  • date: 2009-03-31T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2007-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading
  • date: 2009-04-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-211&language=EN type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading title: A6-0211/2009 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2007-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
  • date: 2009-04-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090422&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-04-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-277 type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading title: T6-0277/2009 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
  • date: 2009-09-24T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) meeting_id: 2963
  • date: 2009-10-21T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2009-10-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2009-11-14T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R1072 title: Regulation 2009/1072 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:300:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ L 300 14.11.2009, p. 0072
commission
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2009-01-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GROSCH Mathieu group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2007-07-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GROSCH Mathieu group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
TRAN
date
2009-01-19T00:00:00
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu
committees/2
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
TRAN
date
2007-07-13T00:00:00
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) meeting_id: 2963 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2963*&MEET_DATE=24/09/2009 date: 2009-09-24T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2877 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2877*&MEET_DATE=12/06/2008 date: 2008-06-12T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2861 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2861*&MEET_DATE=07/04/2008 date: 2008-04-07T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2835 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2835*&MEET_DATE=29/11/2007 date: 2007-11-29T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2007-05-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0635/COM_SEC(2007)0635_EN.pdf title: SEC(2007)0635 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=635 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2007-05-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/0636/COM_SEC(2007)0636_EN.pdf title: SEC(2007)0636 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=636 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2007-11-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE396.395 title: PE396.395 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-01-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE398.390 title: PE398.390 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-02-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-38&language=EN title: A6-0038/2008 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-03-12T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0489)(documentyear:2008)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES0489/2008 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
  • date: 2008-06-12T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14664&j=0&l=en title: SP(2008)3593/2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2009-01-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=0109%2F09&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 00109/2009 type: Council statement on its position body: CSL
  • date: 2009-01-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0673/COM_COM(2008)0673_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0673 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=673 title: EUR-Lex summary: The Commission considers that the common position reflects the main objectives of its proposal and can therefore support it. The common position adopted by the Council integrated as such or in principle a certain number of the amendments adopted by the European Parliament, all of which were also acceptable as such or in principle for the Commission. These amendments concern: the definition of the exception for the carriage of mail; the limitation of details to be contained in the evidence to be produced for the international carriage; the deletion of the reference to working time as mandatory rules applicable to cabotage; the introduction of a safeguard procedure in the event of serious disturbances due to cabotage; and the deletion of the reference to repeated minor infringements; a provision on cabotage in a transit country. The common position did not include the following amendments, which were acceptable in principle or with redrafting for the Commission: a recital on the relation to the directive 92/106/EEC on combined transport; the clearer use of the concept of "temporary"; the imposition of fines as one possibility of a penalty; the fixation of the date of application on 1 January 2009; the common position foresees to apply the regulation 24 months after its entry into force. Other amendments, deemed as unacceptable by the Commission, have not been included in the common position. They are as follows: the further opening of the cabotage market; the authorisation of cabotage after partial unloading; the authorisation for closer cooperation on cabotage between certain Member States; the reference to the posting of workers directive as rules applicable to cabotage; the possibility for Member States to regulate cross trade; the demand for a single document for all kind of road transports. type: Commission communication on Council's position body: EC
  • date: 2009-01-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE418.415 title: PE418.415 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2009-02-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE420.083 title: PE420.083 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2009-04-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-211&language=EN title: A6-0211/2009 type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-06-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0305/COM_COM(2009)0305_EN.pdf title: COM(2009)0305 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2009&nu_doc=305 title: EUR-Lex summary: After several months of negotiations under the Czech Presidency, Parliament and the Council agreed on a compromise at second reading, in particular concerning the definition of cabotage. The Commission can accept the compromise amendment adopted by the European Parliament after the second reading to confirm this agreement. type: Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading body: EC
  • date: 2009-10-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=[%n4]%2F09&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 03658/2009/LEX type: Draft final act body: CSL
  • date: 2014-04-14T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0222 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2014)0222 summary: In accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 on access to the international road haulage market, the Commission presents a report on the state of the Union road transport market. The report contains: · an analysis of the market situation , including an evaluation of the effectiveness of controls and the evolution of employment conditions in the profession ; · an assessment on whether harmonisation of the rules of enforcement and road user charges, as well as social and safety legislation, has progressed to such an extent that the further opening of domestic road transport markets, including cabotage , could be envisaged. Market situation : the main developments affecting the road haulage market since the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 consist of overarching trends such as the economic crisis and the successive enlargements of the EU. The report makes the following points: · although the sector appeared to be slowly recovering from the economic crisis until 2011, transport volumes have since dropped again , following developments in the rest of the economy ; · other major trends that had been present before the economic crisis continue to play a significant part in defining transport movements, such as the growing role of freight forwarders and third party logistics providers in consolidating loads and in contractual relations with hauliers ; · the adoption of the 2009 road package has contributed to providing hauliers and enforcers with common standards and criteria for access to the occupation and to the international road haulage market. However, certain provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 are difficult to apply, in particular those relating to stable establishment of road haulage undertakings and to cabotage; · the shortage of drivers is mitigated by the crisis but remains a source of concern, particularly for specialised drivers. In the future, this will create new demands for drivers and qualifications, including within an ageing workforce. · working conditions remain difficult in the road haulage sector, while contractual relations remain marked by high levels of self-employment ; · with a decreasing pool of available drivers , companies must reduce high levels of empty running in order to make better use of their staff. Under these conditions, the Commission considers that improved efficiency of the road haulage sector will contribute to the competitiveness of the EU economy as a whole. Convergence of market indicators Gradual cost convergence : Member States have different cost structures in the road haulage sector. Whilst it is unlikely that cost differences will disappear entirely, the gap has been constantly narrowing: (i) hauliers involved in international transport are exposed to costs such as road charging and fuel costs, which are applied to users regardless of the Member State of registration; (ii) the participation of drivers in international transport operations, in which remunerations are traditionally higher, has led to an increase in wage levels particularly in those Member States that joined the EU in 2004 and 2007. The gradual convergence of cost levels compels hauliers to compete on efficiency and quality of services, benefitting transport users throughout the EU economy. However, it is not a competence of the EU nor is it an aim of the Single Market to equalise costs. Legislative developments : these are leading to further harmonisation of the framework conditions in the road haulage sector. This includes the increasing use of road charging systems, additional technical harmonisation and enhanced safety of road transport vehicles, and increased cooperation between EU Member States in tackling traffic offenses. These developments limit the risk for road safety that an increase in competitive pressure could create, notably in the case of further market opening. The Commission considers that there is some scope for further harmonisation in enforcement of the provisions on access to the road haulage market , which continue to diverge between Member States. In particular, the provisions on cabotage in Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 and on stable and effective establishment in Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 do not appear to be applied in a uniform way. Addressing such shortcomings will help to limit unlawful out-flagging, which negatively affects competition and working conditions. Next steps : the Commission suggests: · considering a further reform to clarify the provisions on access to the EU road haulage market. Clearer rules would provide the basis for an enhanced culture of compliance and limit the possibilities for fraud (both in the fiscal or social sphere); · review restrictions on the operation of cabotage , as domestic markets account for around two thirds of all road transport volumes moved. Gradually removing these restrictions could contribute to reducing the administrative burden that the current complex unclear rules create. In addition, this would allow a more efficient matching of transport offer and demand as this could lead to a reduction of empty runs, and would play a part in increasing the sector's economic and fuel efficiency; · design measures aiming at restoring the attractiveness of the profession and improving the working environment of drivers . This includes measures on enforcement, control and mitigation of fiscal and social fraud, as well as improved training levels and skills. Lastly, whenever the current and envisaged instruments and measures mentioned in the report involve the processing of personal data , this must be done in compliance with Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of personal data and the national provisions implementing it. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2016-10-31T00:00:00 docs: title: SWD(2016)0350 type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2016-10-31T00:00:00 docs: title: SWD(2016)0351 type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2014-08-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2014)0222 title: COM(2014)0222 type: Contribution body: PT_PARLIAMENT
events
  • date: 2007-05-23T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0265/COM_COM(2007)0265_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0265 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=265 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to consolidate and merge Regulation (EEC) No 881/92 and (EEC) No 3118/93 on access to the road transport market , in order to simplify current provisions. PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. CONTENT: this proposal is being presented alongside two related proposals all of which are seeking to modernise provisions governing road transport operators and access to the road transport market. The package of proposals includes: Replacing Directive 96/26/EC on admission to the occupation of road transport operator , with a new Regulation. (For a summary of the proposal refer to: COD/2007/0098 ). Merging Regulations (EEC) No 881/92 and (EEC) No 3118/93 on access to the road transport market. (The subject of this summary) Merging Regulations (EEC) No 684/92 and (EC) No 12/98 on access to the market of coach and bus services.” (For a summary of the proposal refer to: COD/2007/0097 Experience shows that certain measures of the current legislative framework are unequally applied thanks in large part to unclear and incomplete legal provisions. Road hauliers have to cope with different national rules and a degree of legal uncertainty, which may entail additional costs when they operate in several Member States. Following an impact assessment a number of challenges to the current legislative framework have been identified and include: - Scope : particularly concerning the transport of Community hauliers to and from third countries; - Implementation : particularly concerning the concept of temporary cabotage. The Member States continue to implement diverging rules that are difficult to enforce and which impose additional administrative burdens on industry; - Exchange of information : an ineffective exchange of information between the Member States results in undertakings facing few, if any, administrative sanctions; - Lack of standardisation : the lack of uniformity vis-à-vis control documents such as the Community licence, certified copies and driver attestation creates problems during roadside checks and frequently leads to considerable time losses for operators. The purpose of this proposal, therefore, is to enhance the clarity and enforceability of the current rules by consolidating and merging the two Regulation dealing with access to the road transport market. The modifications being proposed can be summarised as follows: - a simpler and clearer definition of the term “cabotage”. The new definition is expected to be easier to enforce and will allow for up to three transport operations consecutive to an international journey and within seven days. The holder will be obliged to keep documents in the vehicles such as consignment letters which show the date and place of arrivals/departures; - a simplified and standardised Community licence, certified copies and driver attestations in a bid to reduce the administrative burden and delays at road side checks; - enhanced legal provisions that oblige a Member State to act, when requested to so by another Member State, in cases where a haulier commits an infringement in any EU Member State. The proposal contributes to the simplification of the current legislative framework. Obsolete measures have been abolished and the content, presentation and formulation has been re-examined in order to avoid ambiguous interpretations.
  • date: 2007-09-24T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-11-29T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2835*&MEET_DATE=29/11/2007 title: 2835
  • date: 2008-01-22T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report by Mathieu GROSCH (EPP-ED, BE ) amending, under the first reading of the codecision procedure, the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for access to the international road haulage market (recast). The main amendments made by the committee are as follows: - MEPs wish to clarify that this Regulation shall apply to cabotage operations. In addition, they specify that this Regulation shall not apply to the following types of carriage and unladen journeys made in conjunction with such carriage, since they are exempt from the Community licensing scheme; - the definition of cabotage operations, namely “national carriage for hire or reward carried out on a temporary basis in a host Member State”, must refer to the conditions set out in Chapter III, to prevent the use of other interpretations of ‘carriage on a temporary basis’. The incoming or outgoing carriage of goods by road as one leg of a combined transport journey under the conditions laid down in Directive 92/106/EEC does not fall under the definition of cabotage; - MEPs have deleted a provision which defined infringements which lead to the loss of good repute as “a serious infringement or repeated minor infringements of Community road transport legislation”; - ‘cross-trade’ means international transport operations carried out by a haulier between two host Member States neither of which is the haulier’s state of residence. Where cross-trade between two Member States is carried out by a haulier on a regular, continuous and/or systematic basis, one of the host Member States may call for the application of the working and employment conditions applicable to their own national hauliers; - according to MEPs, cabotage should be authorised with effect from the first unloading, even of a part-load, during an international carriage. Furthermore, cabotage operations may also be carried out in a Member State through which the vehicle has to travel after unloading in the Member State of delivery during an international carriage, provided that the shortest homeward journey transits through that Member State and is carried out within seven days of the unloading in the country of delivery; - a new Article specifies that the restrictions on the number and duration of cabotage operations shall gradually be lifted. Two years after this Regulation enters into force, the number of cabotage operations mentioned in the Regulation shall be increased to seven. On 1 January 2014, all restrictions on the number and duration of cabotage operations shall be lifted; - in order to restrict unnecessary bureaucracy, it needs to be ensured that Member States do not request specific items of evidence. In this context, MEPs have introduced a new provision stipulating that Member States shall not require an additional specific document or duplicate documents proving that the terms and conditions laid down in the Regulation have been met. By 1 January 2010, the Commission shall draw up, in accordance with the regulatory and monitoring procedure, a single harmonised model for a waybill valid throughout the European Union for international haulage, national haulage and cabotage haulage. The Member States and the Commission shall ensure that the provisions laid down in other conventions concluded with third countries are brought into line with the provisions laid down in this Regulation; - the provisions of this Regulation shall not prevent a Member State from authorising goods hauliers from one or more other Member States to carry out on its territory an unlimited number of cabotage operations, or a number in excess of that referred to in the Regulation, with no time limit or with a longer time limit than that referred to in the Regulation for the last unloading. Authorisations granted before the entry into force of this Regulation shall continue to apply. Member States shall inform the Commission of existing authorisations and of authorisations they grant after the entry into force of this Regulation; - Recital 13 explains that the Posted Workers Directive applies to cabotage operations. MEPs believe that this should also be reflected in the articles of the Regulation; - minor infringements should not be covered by the Regulation as they are interpreted and dealt with in different ways in Member States. To ensure that the sanctions have an appropriate effect, MEPs believe that the Regulation should make explicit provision for fines as a possible sanction. These sanctions shall be determined, once a final decision has been issued and after all the legal possibilities for review open to the haulier have been exhausted. Where a serious infringement is ascertained, the competent authorities of the Member State of establishment shall decide what sanction to impose on the haulier concerned. This sanction can range from a warning to the temporary or permanent withdrawal of the Community licence; - the decision on the temporary withdrawal of any document (Community licence, driver attestation, certified copy) shall stipulate: (a) the period of temporary withdrawal; (b) the conditions for ending the temporary withdrawal; (c) the cases in which the Community licence is to be permanently withdrawn, because the conditions laid down pursuant to point (b) have not been satisfied during the period laid down pursuant to point (a); - the data that are to be entered in the databases of national electronic registers should be obtained after final decisions have been taken. Only serious infringements of Community legislation should be recorded in national registers; Lastly, the Regulation should apply from 1 January 2009.
  • date: 2008-02-12T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-38&language=EN title: A6-0038/2008
  • date: 2008-04-07T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2861*&MEET_DATE=07/04/2008 title: 2861 summary: The Council held a public policy debate on three legislative proposals that seek to modernise, replace and merge legislation governing road transport operators and access to the road transport markets (see COD/2007/0097 and COD/2007/0098 ). Ministers were invited to agree in principle to the outline of the presidency compromise package on the key elements of two of the three proposals. The Council broadly supported the presidency compromise as a good basis for further work on these proposals and invited Coreper to pursue examination of the outstanding issues with the objective of reaching a political agreement on all these proposals at the Transport, Telecommunications and Energy Council in June 2008. The presidency compromise focuses in particular on two main issues, cabotage and national electronic registers. All delegations expressed their support in principle for the Commission proposal on access to the international road haulage market. Following the work carried out within the Council, some provisions of the Commission's proposal were adapted in order to reach consensus on most parts of the draft regulation. These modifications particularly concern scope and definitions, the format of the Community licence, certified copies and the driver attestation, mutual assistance and penalties, and a list of security features to avoid manipulation and forgery of the Community licence and driver attestation documents. A majority of delegations supported the presidency compromise on cabotage. This compromise follows the Commission's proposal allowing for up to 3 transport operations consecutive to an international journey within 7 days. In addition, the Commission will be invited to assess, in a report, whether progress in the harmonisation of certain rules (i.e. enforcement and taxation) allows for a further opening of domestic transport markets, including in the field of cabotage. In addition, several delegations asked to consider the possibility of including in the text additional cabotage operations on the return trip if the lorry takes the shortest route back.
  • date: 2008-05-20T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080520&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-05-21T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14664&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-05-21T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-218 title: T6-0218/2008 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 494 votes to 133 with 46 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for access to the international road haulage market (recast). The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Mathieu GROSCH (EPP-ED, BE) on behalf of the Committee on Transport and Tourism. The main amendments - adopted in first reading of the codecision procedure - are as follows: -the Regulation shall apply to cabotage operations. It will not apply to specified types of carriage and unladen journeys made in conjunction with such carriage, since they are exempt from the Community licensing scheme; - the definition of cabotage operations, namely "national carriage for hire or reward carried out on a temporary basis in a host Member State", must refer to the conditions set out in Chapter III, to prevent the use of other interpretations of 'carriage on a temporary basis'. The incoming or outgoing carriage of goods by road as one leg of a combined transport journey under the conditions laid down in Directive 92/106/EEC does not fall under the definition of cabotage; -the Regulation deals with serious infringements and not with repeated minor infringements; -'cross-trade' means international transport operations carried out by a haulier between two host Member States neither of which is the haulier's state of residence. Where cross-trade between two Member States is carried out by a haulier on a regular, continuous and/or systematic basis, one of the host Member States may call for the application of the working and employment conditions applicable to their own national hauliers; -cabotage should be authorised with effect from the first unloading, even of a part-load, during an international carriage. Furthermore, cabotage operations may also be carried out in a Member State through which the vehicle has to travel after unloading in the Member State of delivery during an international carriage, provided that the shortest homeward journey transits through that Member State and is carried out within seven days of the unloading in the country of delivery; - a new Article specifies that the restrictions on the number and duration of cabotage operations shall gradually be lifted. Two years after this Regulation enters into force, the number of cabotage operations mentioned above shall be increased to seven. On 1 January 2014, all restrictions on the number and duration of cabotage operations shall be lifted; -in order to restrict unnecessary bureaucracy, it needs to be ensured that Member States do not request specific items of evidence. In this context, MEPs have introduced a new provision stipulating that Member States shall not require an additional specific document or duplicate documents proving that the terms and conditions laid down in the Regulation have been met. By 1 January 2010, the Commission shall draw up, in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny, a single harmonised model for a waybill valid throughout the EU for international haulage, national haulage and cabotage haulage. The Member States and the Commission shall ensure that the provisions laid down in other conventions concluded with third countries are brought into line with the provisions laid down in this Regulation; -the provisions of this Regulation shall not prevent a Member State from authorising goods hauliers from one or more other Member States to carry out on its territory an unlimited number of cabotage operations, or a number in excess of that referred to in the Regulation, with no time limit or with a longer time limit than that referred to in the Regulation for the last unloading. Authorisations granted before the entry into force of this Regulation shall continue to apply. Member States shall inform the Commission of existing authorisations and of authorisations they grant after the entry into force of the Regulation; -the incoming or outgoing carriage of goods by road as one leg of a combined transport journey under the conditions laid down in Directive 92/106/EEC does not fall under the definition of cabotage. -the posting of workers as set out under Directive 96/71/EC is reflected in the articles of the Regulation; -a new Article states that after the lifting of the restrictions referred to in the text, in the event of serious disturbance of the national transport market in a given geographical area due to or aggravated by cabotage, any Member State may refer the matter to the Commission with a view to the adoption of safeguard measures and shall inform and notify it of the measures it intends to take as regards resident carriers. The terms 'serious disturbance of the national transport market in a given geographical area' and 'geographical area' are defined. -the Commission shall examine the situation, on the basis in particular of the latest quarterly data and, after consulting the Advisory Committee set up by Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 3916/90, shall decide within one month of receipt of the relevant Member State's request whether or not safeguard measures are necessary and shall adopt them if they are necessary. Such measures may involve the temporary exclusion of the area concerned from the scope of the Regulation. The measures introduced in accordance with this Article shall remain in force for a period not exceeding six months, renewable once within the same limits of validity. If the Commission decides to take safeguard measures concerning one or more Member States, the competent authorities of the Member States involved shall be required to take measures of equivalent scope in respect of resident carriers and shall inform the Commission thereof. These measures shall be applied at the latest as from the same date as the safeguard measures decided on by the Commission. Any Member State may submit a Commission decision to the Council within 30 days of its notification. The Council, acting by a qualified majority within 30 days of referral by a Member State or, if there are referrals by several Member States, of the first referral, may take a different decision. The time limits shall apply to the Council's decision. The competent authorities of the Member States concerned shall be required to take measures of equivalent scope in respect of resident carriers and shall inform the Commission thereof. If the Council takes no decision, the Commission decision shall become final. Where the Commission considers that the measures need to be prolonged, it shall submit a proposal to the Council, which shall take a decision by qualified majority. -minor infringements should not be covered by the Regulation as they are interpreted and dealt with in different ways in Member States. To ensure that the sanctions have an appropriate effect, MEPs believe that the Regulation should make explicit provision for fines as a possible sanction. These sanctions shall be determined, once a final decision has been issued and after all the legal possibilities for review open to the haulier have been exhausted. Where a serious infringement is ascertained, the competent authorities of the Member State of establishment shall decide what sanction to impose on the haulier concerned. This sanction can range from a warning to the temporary or permanent withdrawal of the Community licence; -the decision on the temporary withdrawal of any document (Community licence, driver attestation, certified copy) shall stipulate: (a) the period of temporary withdrawal; (b) the conditions for ending the temporary withdrawal; (c) the cases in which the Community licence is to be permanently withdrawn, because the conditions laid down pursuant to point (b) have not been satisfied during the period laid down pursuant to point (a); -the data that are to be entered in the databases of national electronic registers should be obtained after final decisions have been taken. Only serious infringements of Community legislation should be recorded in national registers; Lastly, the Regulation should apply from 1 January 2009.
  • date: 2009-01-09T00:00:00 type: Council position published body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11788%2F08&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 11788/1/2008 summary: The common position adopted by the Council, by qualified majority, integrated as such or in principle a certain number of the amendments adopted by the European Parliament, all of which were also acceptable as such or in principle for the Commission The key policy issues are as follows: Community licence and driver attestation : the Commission proposal foresees the issuing of a Community licence for a renewable period of 5 years. The common position therefore extends the validity of the renewable Community licence to "up to 10 years", introduces the (comitology) regulatory procedure with scrutiny to care for future necessary adaptations of the validity of the Community licence, and also amends accordingly the provisions concerning the verification of conditions for the issuing and renewal of the licence. As for the recording of the serial number of the driver attestation in the national electronic register, the common position deviates from the Commission proposal and leaves this provision optional. In order to avoid possible falsifications of these documents, the Council decided to amend Annexes I and II by adding a series of security features, of which at least two have to be used within the documents. The European Parliament decided to follow the Commission's approach and did not adopt amendments on this issue. Cabotage : in order to avoid unladen journeys on Community roads, the common position introduces an additional provision allowing hauliers to carry out cabotage operations in transited Member States. Such operations will be limited to one per transited Member State within three days following the unladen entry into the territory of that Member State. The overall number of operations, however, will still be limited to three within seven days. The Council also re-introduces certain safeguard measures which are currently in force and which allow Member States, following approval by the Commission, to introduce protective measures in case of serious disturbance of the national transport market in a geographical area due to or aggravated by cabotage. The common position also obliges the Commission to assess, in a future report on the state of the Community road transport market, whether the progress in the harmonisation of certain rules (i.e. enforcement and road user charges) allows further opening of the domestic transport markets, including cabotage. The European Parliament accepted the Commission's proposal of allowing three consecutive cabotage operations within seven days. Contrary to the approach taken by the Council and the Commission, the European Parliament voted in favour of a complete liberalisation of cabotage operations as of 1 January 2014. Cooperation between Member States : following the Commission proposal, the common position obliges Member States to exchange information via the national contact points. Member States are also obliged to enter into their national register of road transport undertakings all serious infringements of Community transport legislation which have led to the imposition of a penalty. Moreover, the Council decided to enter into the national registers any temporary or permanent withdrawal of the Community licence or of the certified true copies. The latter entries will remain in the data base for two years. The European Parliament decided to follow the Commission proposal and did not adopt amendments on this issue. Sanctioning of infringements : the common position as agreed by the Council follows to a large extent the Commission's approach towards serious infringements. However, the Council agreed to leave the weighing of repeated minor infringements to the discretion of the Member States. The common position also introduces the obligation for the competent authority of the Member State of establishment of the haulier to communicate to the competent authority of the Member State in which an infringement was ascertained whether and which penalties have been imposed. The timeframe foreseen for this communication is fixed within two months after the final decision on the matter has been taken. As regards the procedure to the followed by the Member State which ascertains a serious infringement committed by a non-resident haulier, the common position provides a delay of two months (instead of one month) to communicate the information (in minimum standard format) to the Member State of establishment. Moreover, the text does not contain any obligation for the Member State of establishment of the haulier to report on the follow-up. The European Parliament also decided against the inclusion of provisions concerning repeated minor infringement. Moreover, it voted in favour of a provision allowing the imposition of fines as a possible penalty. The Council common position integrated fully or in principle amendments concerning a modified definition of the exception for the carriage of mail and the limitation of details contained in the evidence to be produced for the international carriage in connection with cabotage operations. The amendments not included in the common position concern: a recital on the relation to Directive 92/106/EEC on combined transport; an addition to the definition of cabotage; 1 January 2009 as a fixed date of application of this Regulation; the reference to the Directive on the posting of workers as rules applicable to cabotage; the possibility for Member States to regulate cross trade.
  • date: 2009-01-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-03-31T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report drawn up by Mathieu GROSCH (EPP-ED, BE), modifying, under the second reading of codecision procedure, the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for access to the international road haulage market (recast). The main amendments are as follows: Market situation : a new recital states that the gradual integration of the single European market should lead to the elimination of restrictions of access to the internal market of Member States. Nevertheless, this should take into account the effectiveness of controls and the evolution of employment conditions in the profession, as well as the harmonisation of the rules in the fields, inter alia, of enforcement and road user changes, as well as social and safety legislation. The Commission should closely monitor the market situation as well as the harmonisation mentioned above and propose, if appropriate, further opening of domestic road transport markets, including cabotage. Roadside checks : road side checks should be carried out without discrimination, directly or indirectly, on the grounds of nationality of the road transport operator or the country of establishment of the road transport operator or of registration of the vehicle. Cabotage: the frequency of cabotage operations and the period in which they can be performed should be more clearly defined (rather than limited.) The Regulation is without prejudice to the provisions concerning the incoming or outgoing carriage of goods by road as one leg of a combined transport journey as laid down in Council Directive 92/106/EEC on the establishment of common rules for certain types of combined transport of goods between Member States. National journeys by road within a host Member State which are not part of a combined transport operation as laid down in Council Directive 92/106/EEC fall within the definition of cabotage and should accordingly be subject to the requirements of this Regulation. Sanctioning of infringement by Member State of establishment : the Member State of establishment of the haulier who has committed an infringement shall take the appropriate action which may include a warning, if provided for by national law. Communication between Member States : the final decision must be notified within 6 weeks, rather than 2 months. Application : certain articles on cabotage will only enter into force 6 months after the publication of the Regulation.
  • date: 2009-04-02T00:00:00 type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-211&language=EN title: A6-0211/2009
  • date: 2009-04-22T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090422&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-04-23T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-277 title: T6-0277/2009 summary: The European Parliament adopted a legislative resolution modifying, under the second reading of the codecision procedure, the Council’s common position on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for access to the international road haulage market (recast). The amendments are the result of a compromise between Parliament and Council. The main amendments are as follows: Market situation : a new recital states that the gradual integration of the single European market should lead to the elimination of restrictions of access to the internal market of Member States. Nevertheless, this should take into account the effectiveness of controls and the evolution of employment conditions in the profession, as well as the harmonisation of the rules in the fields, inter alia, of enforcement and road user changes, as well as social and safety legislation. The Commission should closely monitor the market situation as well as the harmonisation mentioned above and propose, if appropriate, further opening of domestic road transport markets, including cabotage. Roadside checks: road side checks should be carried out without discrimination, directly or indirectly, on the grounds of nationality of the road transport operator or the country of establishment of the road transport operator or of registration of the vehicle. Cabotage: the frequency of cabotage operations and the period in which they can be performed should be more clearly defined (rather than limited.) The Regulation is without prejudice to the provisions concerning the incoming or outgoing carriage of goods by road as one leg of a combined transport journey as laid down in Council Directive 92/106/EEC on the establishment of common rules for certain types of combined transport of goods between Member States. National journeys by road within a host Member State which are not part of a combined transport operation as laid down in Council Directive 92/106/EEC fall within the definition of cabotage and should accordingly be subject to the requirements of this Regulation. The text states that national road haulage services carried out in the host Member State by a non-resident haulier shall only be deemed to conform to this Regulation if the haulier can produce clear evidence of the incoming international carriage and of each consecutive cabotage operation carried out. The information which comprises evidence is listed in the text. No additional document shall be required in order to prove that the conditions laid down in the article have been met. Sanctioning of infringement by Member State of establi shment : the Member State of establishment of the haulier who has committed an infringement shall take the appropriate action which may include a warning, if provided for by national law. Communication between Member States : the final decision must be notified within 6 weeks, rather than 2 months. Application: certain articles on cabotage will only enter into force 6 months after the publication of the Regulation.
  • date: 2009-09-24T00:00:00 type: Act approved by Council, 2nd reading body: CSL
  • date: 2009-10-21T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL
  • date: 2009-10-21T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2009-11-14T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to set out the rules on the international carriage of goods by road. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for access to the international road haulage market. CONTENT: the Council adopted three regulations that seek to modernise, replace and merge provisions governing road transport operators and access to the road transport markets, following a second reading agreement with the European Parliament under the codecision procedure. These regulations concern: access to the international road haulage market; on access to the international market of coach and bus services ; admission to the occupation of road transport operator . This Regulation on common rules for access to the international road haulage market seeks to simplify and harmonise further the current rules by consolidating and merging Regulations (EC) No 881/92, (EC) No 3118/93 and Directive 2006/94/EC on access to the road transport market. The main objective is to eliminate legal uncertainty for Community hauliers and adapt legislation to market needs. The main points of the Regulation are as follows: Cabotage : the Regulation provides that any haulier for hire or reward who is a holder of a Community licence and whose driver, if he is a national of a third country, holds a driver attestation, shall be entitled, under the conditions laid down in the text, to carry out cabotage operations. Once the goods carried in the course of an incoming international carriage have been delivered, hauliers will be permitted to carry out up to three cabotage operations following the international carriage from another Member State or from a third country to the host Member State. The last unloading in the course of a cabotage operation before leaving the host Member State shall take place within 7 days from the last unloading in the host Member State in the course of the incoming international carriage. Hauliers may carry out some or all of these cabotage operations in any Member State under the condition that they are limited to one cabotage operation per Member State within 3 days of the unladen entry into the territory of that Member State. Safeguard procedure : in the event of serious disturbance of the national transport market in a given geographical area due to, or aggravated by, cabotage, any Member State may refer the matter to the Commission with a view to the adoption of safeguard measures. It must provide the Commission with the necessary information and notify it of the measures it intends to take as regards resident hauliers. ‘Serious disturbance of the national transport market in a given geographical area’ is defined as the existence on the market of problems specific to it, such that there is a serious and potentially enduring excess of supply over demand, implying a threat to the financial stability and survival of a significant number of hauliers. The Commission will examine the situation on the basis in particular of the relevant data and decide within 1 month of receipt of the Member State’s request whether or not safeguard measures are necessary and shall adopt them if they are necessary. Such measures may involve the temporary exclusion of the area concerned from the scope of the Regulation. Safeguard measures will remain in force for a period not exceeding 6 months, renewable once within the same limits of validity. If the Commission decides to adopt safeguard measures concerning one or more Member States, the competent authorities of the Member States involved shall be required to take measures of equivalent scope in respect of resident hauliers. The Council may take a different decision from the Commission under conditions set out in the text. Sanctioning of infringements by the Member State of establishment: rules on the withdrawal of the Community licence are clarified and strengthened. The Regulation provides that in the event of a serious infringement of Community road transport legislation committed in any Member State, the Member State of establishment of the haulier who has committed such infringement shall take the appropriate action which may include a warning, if provided for by national law, to pursue the matter which may lead, inter alia, to the imposition of the following administrative penalties: (a) temporary or permanent withdrawal of some or all of the certified true copies of the Community licence; (b) temporary or permanent withdrawal of the Community licence. These penalties may be determined after the final decision on the matter has been taken and shall have regard to the seriousness of the infringement committed by the holder of the Community licence and to the total number of certified true copies of that licence that he holds in respect of international traffic. In the event of a serious infringement regarding any misuse whatsoever of driver attestations , the Member State of establishment of the haulier who committed such infringement shall impose appropriate penalties, such as: (a) suspending the issue of driver attestations; (b) withdrawing driver attestations; (c) making the issue of driver attestations subject to additional conditions in order to prevent misuse; (d) withdrawing, temporarily or permanently, some or all of the certified true copies of the Community licence; (e) withdrawing, temporarily or permanently, the Community licence. Member States should enter in their national electronic register of road transport undertakings all serious infringements committed by hauliers which have led to the imposition of a penalty. Report: the Commission shall draw up a report on the state of the Community road transport market by the end of 2013. The report shall contain an analysis of the market situation, including an evaluation of the effectiveness of controls and the evolution of employment conditions in the profession, as well as an assessment as to whether harmonisation of the rules in the fields, inter alia, of enforcement and road user charges, as well as social and safety legislation, has progressed to such an extent that the further opening of domestic road transport markets, including cabotage, could be envisaged. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 04/12/2009. It shall apply from 04/12/2011, with the exception of Articles 8 and 9 (rules applicable to sabotage operations), which shall apply from 14 May 2010. docs: title: Regulation 2009/1072 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R1072 title: OJ L 300 14.11.2009, p. 0072 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:300:TOC
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
TRAN/6/71863
New
  • TRAN/6/71863
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R1072
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R1072
procedure/instrument
Old
Regulation
New
  • Regulation
  • Repealing Regulations (EEC) No 881/92 and (EEC) No 3118/93 Repealing Directive 2006/94/EC 2004/0017(COD) Amended by 2017/0123(COD)
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.20.05 Road transport: passengers and freight
New
3.20.05
Road transport: passengers and freight
procedure/summary
  • Repealing Directive 2006/94/EC
  • Repealing Regulations (EEC) No 881/92 and (EEC) No 3118/93
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
activities
  • date: 2007-05-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0265/COM_COM(2007)0265_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52007PC0265:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2007)0265 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission: DG: Energy and Transport Commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
  • date: 2007-09-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2007-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2835 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2835*&MEET_DATE=29/11/2007 type: Debate in Council title: 2835 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2007-11-29T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2008-01-22T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2007-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-02-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-38&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0038/2008 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2007-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2861 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2861*&MEET_DATE=07/04/2008 type: Debate in Council title: 2861 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2008-04-07T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2008-05-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080520&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-05-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14664&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-218 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0218/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-06-12T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2877
  • date: 2009-01-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11788%2F08&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Council position published title: 11788/1/2008 body: CSL type: Council position published
  • date: 2009-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2007-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu
  • date: 2009-03-31T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2007-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading
  • date: 2009-04-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-211&language=EN type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading title: A6-0211/2009 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2007-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
  • date: 2009-04-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090422&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-04-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-277 type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading title: T6-0277/2009 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
  • date: 2009-09-24T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) meeting_id: 2963
  • date: 2009-10-21T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2009-10-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2009-11-14T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R1072 title: Regulation 2009/1072 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:300:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ L 300 14.11.2009, p. 0072
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2007-07-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GROSCH Mathieu
links
National parliaments
European Commission
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
TRAN/6/71863
reference
2007/0099(COD)
instrument
Regulation
legal_basis
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 071
stage_reached
Procedure completed
summary
subtype
Recast
title
Access to the international road haulage market. Recast
type
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
final
subject
3.20.05 Road transport: passengers and freight