Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AGRI | GKLAVAKIS Ioannis ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | BUDG |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 037-p2
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 037-p2Events
PURPOSE: to amend provisions relating to the cotton sector under the common agricultural policy.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and establishing national restructuring programmes for the cotton sector.
CONTENT: the Council adopted a Regulation reforming the support scheme in the cotton sector. The Regulation amends Regulation 1782/2003 on common rules for direct agricultural support schemes as regards cotton and establishes a scheme for restructuring the cotton sector.
The main measures in the Regulation are:
decoupling of 65% of the total aid, while maintaining 35% still linked to production (same ratio as in the 2004 reform); eligibility for coupled aid for land approved by the Member State and authorised seed varieties; coupled aid to be determined on the basis of fixed yields per hectare, reference amounts per eligible hectare and limited national base areas for each Member State concerned; national restructuring programmes for the sector, financed by the Community, introducing market orientation measures in support of quality schemes and promotion activities and ensuring a more viable ginning industry.
In the new Regulation, the national base areas are hereby established as follows:
Bulgaria : 3342 ha, Greece : 250000 ha, Spain : 48000 ha, Portugal : 360 ha.
The amount of the aid per eligible hectare is established by multiplying the yields laid down in paragraph 2 with the following reference amounts:
Bulgaria: EUR 671.33, Greece: EUR 251.75, Spain: EUR 400.00, Portugal: EUR 252.73.
The Regulation responds to a judgment by the Court of Justice of 7 September 2006 (Case C-310/04) which annulled the cotton reform Regulation adopted in 2004. It is based on an impact assessment and on a consultation of stakeholders. It is also in line with the objectives set out in the Protocol No 4 to the Act of Accession of Greece, concerning cotton production in Community regions where it is important for the agricultural economy. Equivalent Protocols were annexed to the Accession Treaties of Spain and Portugal.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 12/07/2008.
APPLICATION: from 01/01/2009.
The European Parliament adopted, by 395 votes to 161 and 64 abstentions, a legislative resolution making some amendments to the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, as regards the support scheme for cotton. The report was tabled for consideration in plenary by Ioannis KLAVAKIS (EPP-ED, EL), on behalf of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development.
The main amendments adopted in the framework of the consultation procedure are as follows :
-Parliament proposes to maintain the financial neutrality of the proposal with regard to coupled support, which means the decommitment of EUR 202.2 million for Greece and EUR 72.73 million for Spain. Given the likely reduction in the size of land used for cotton growing, the base area should be reduced from 370 000 ha to 270 000 ha for Greece, with the amount of coupled support at EUR 750 a hectare. In Spain, the base area should also be reduced accordingly (from 70 000 ha to 50 000 ha), which would mean coupled support of EUR 1 450 a hectare;
-the total available aid per hectare per Member State should be set in line with the Member State's wishes and at no lower than 35% of the national share of the aid that went indirectly to the producers, in line with subsidiarity;
-if the Member States take the view that the sector's viability depends upon the percentage of de-coupled aid, they should be able to select some other percentage different from the single payment, which may not exceed 65% or be less than 20% ;
- it is proposed that the coupled aid should be increased if the guaranteed area is not reached. The amount of aid would, however, be limited by the Management Committee. Any saving brought about by a fall in production shall be allocated to the national support programmes;
-national support programmes shall be established for the purpose of improving competitiveness. The Community shall determine and shall finance the eligible actions. The Member States shall select whatever package of measures they consider effective and which are best suited to their regional particularities. That package could include a restructuring fund for the ginning industry. The national support programmes shall be financed by means of a minimum basic rate of 1% of the overall amount of coupled support. Appropriations unused under coupled support because of the reduction in growing areas to less than the size of the base area of each Member State shall be added to this amount;
-the national support programmes shall include the sum earmarked for the restructuring of cotton-producing regions, which comes to EUR 22 000 000 (i.e. 2.74% of aid) and which had been transferred to the second pillar;
-at the Member States' discretion, measures may be financed under the national support programmes that aim to offset the effects of a possible fall in production and to restructure varieties, along with measures to modernise production in order to improve the competitiveness of the product. Support shall be granted for environmentally friendly growing methods in order to ensure a more rational use of water resources and to minimise the use of plant-health products, research aimed at creating improved-quality varieties shall be encouraged and restructuring and the modernisation of ginning plants shall be promoted. Member States may grant a quality premium to farmers who develop a product of exceptional quality, on the basis of specific criteria laid down by the Member States;
-policies may be funded under the national support programmes to forecast, mitigate and combat the effects of climate change on cotton-producing regions;
-by 31 December 2009 at the latest the Commission shall submit a report to the Council on the implementation of this Regulation with regard to olive oil, table olives and olive groves, tobacco and hops, accompanied, if necessary, by appropriate proposals.
-the provisions concerning cotton should remain in force until 2013, not 2010 as stated under Regulation No 1782/2003.
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development adopted a report drafted by Ioannis GKLAVAKIS (EPP-ED, GR) and amended the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, as regards the support scheme for cotton.
The amendments relate to the following:
-the Committee wishes to maintain the financial neutrality of the proposal with regard to coupled support, which means the decommitment of EUR 202.2 million for Greece and EUR 72.73 million for Spain. Given the likely reduction in the size of land used for cotton growing, the base area should be reduced from 370 000 ha to 270 000 ha for Greece, with the amount of coupled support at EUR 750 a hectare. In Spain, the base area should also be reduced accordingly (from 70 000 ha to 50 000 ha), which would mean coupled support of EUR 1 450 a hectare;
-the total available aid per hectare per Member State should be set in line with the Member State's wishes and at no lower than 35% of the national share of the aid that went indirectly to the producers, in line with subsidiarity;
-if the Member States take the view that the sector's viability depends upon the percentage of de-coupled aid, they should be able to select some other percentage different from the single payment, which may not exceed 65% or be less than 20% ;
-national support programmes shall be established for the purpose of improving competitiveness. The Community shall determine and shall finance the eligible actions. The Member States shall select whatever package of measures they consider effective and which are best suited to their regional particularities. That package could include a restructuring fund for the ginning industry. The national support programmes shall be financed by means of a minimum basic rate of 1% of the overall amount of coupled support. Appropriations unused under coupled support because of the reduction in growing areas to less than the size of the base area of each Member State shall be added to this amount;
-the national support programmes shall include the sum earmarked for the restructuring of cotton-producing regions, which comes to EUR 22 000 000 (i.e. 2.74% of aid) and which had been transferred to the second pillar;
-at the Member States' discretion, measures may be financed under the national support programmes that aim to offset the effects of a possible fall in production and to restructure varieties, along with measures to modernise production in order to improve the competitiveness of the product. Support shall be granted for environmentally friendly growing methods in order to ensure a more rational use of water resources and to minimise the use of plant-health products, research aimed at creating improved-quality varieties shall be encouraged and restructuring and the modernisation of ginning plants shall be promoted. Member States may grant a quality premium to farmers who develop a product of exceptional quality, on the basis of specific criteria laid down by the Member States;
-policies may be funded under the national support programmes to forecast, mitigate and combat the effects of climate change on cotton-producing regions.
-the Committee proposed that the coupled aid should be increased if the guaranteed area is not reached. It provided that where the admissible cotton area in a given Member State is smaller than the base area, the aid for that Member State shall be increased in proportion to the base area which has not been covered, up to a ceiling established by means of the management procedure. Any saving brought about by a fall in production shall be allocated to the national support programmes.
-by 31 December 2009 at the latest the Commission shall submit a report to the Council on the implementation of this Regulation with regard to olive oil, table olives and olive groves, tobacco and hops, accompanied, if necessary, by appropriate proposals.
-the provisions concerning cotton should remain in force until 2013, not 2010 as stated under Regulation No 1782/2003.
PURPOSE: to amend payment provisions establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.
BACKGROUND: internationally, the EU is a minor player on the world cotton market, contributing only about 2% to the world’s total production of cotton. The main producing countries are China, the USA and India. The cotton sector, despite being of limited significance to the EU as a whole (contributing only 0.15% of the final agricultural output) has strong regional importance in the two main producing Member States namely Greece and Spain. Around 76% of the EU’s total output is grown in Greece. A small amount of cotton is also grown in Bulgaria. Most farmers growing cotton are small in size (Greece 4.5 ha and Spain 11.0 ha). In Greece there are 79 700 farmers growing cotton and in Spain 9 500.
From an environmental point of view growing cotton has a number of negative side-effects. Dependent on irrigation and fertilisers, cotton is widely associated with low biodiversity and soil impoverishment. It is reliant on phytosanitary products, especially insecticides and leaf defoliants. At the processing level, a mixture of private enterprises and co-operatives convert the raw cotton into its useable state through the ginning process, which separates cotton fibres from the seed. The capacity of Spain’s 29 ginning plants, nearly half of which are co-operatives, far exceeds it production. In Greece the ginning capacity is more in balance with production and a lower proportion of plants are run by co-operatives.
In recent years the CAP has undergone a fundamental reform aimed at increasing competitiveness, stabilising farm incomes, integrating environmental concerns into agricultural policy and simplifying and strengthening decentralisation. Alongside the general reform of the CAP, the Community adopted in 2003 Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (see CNS/2003/0006 ) establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers. This sets out, amongst others, rules for the specific payment for cotton (Chapter 10a of Title 4). However, in 2006, these provisions were annulled by the European Court of Justice (case C-310/04). The Court concluded that the proportionality principle had been infringed because the EC had failed :
to carry out an impact assessment ; to consider direct labour costs in the evaluation and decision process ; and to take account of the new regime’s impact on the ginning industry which, although not included in the Protocol, is directly linked to the business of cotton production.
As a result payment provisions have been suspended until the adoption of a new Regulation.
CONTENT: on the basis of the above, the Commission is presenting an amending Regulation to Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, which takes account of the ECJ’s judgement. Prior to adopting this proposal the Commission held a round of consultation with all interested parties and commissioned an impact assessment, which was carried out in 2007.
In summary, the new cotton regime would seek:
to continue agricultural cotton activity in the EU’s cotton-producing regions; to offer support for cotton producers that is compatible with the principles applying to the reformed CAP; to offer support to cotton producers that is compatible with the EU’s WTO commitments; to stabilise and control the EU budget; to maintain the EU’s market orientation vis-à-vis the cotton sector; to reduce the impact of cotton production on the environment; and to simplify the management of the support regime for cotton producers.
To realise the above the Commission recommends that 65% of resources devoted to supporting the cotton sector before the 2004 reform should continue in the Single Payment Scheme. This will offer cotton growers stable incomes, while leaving them free to adopt to market developments. The remaining 35% will continue to be linked to cotton production, as an area payment. These coupled payments are designed to ensure the continuity of cotton growing at a level sufficient to safeguard the ginning industry in those regions where it represents an important economic activity.
Based on the results of questionnaires sent out, as well as on the conclusions of the impact assessment, the Commission proposes that, in the medium term, a coupled rate of support of about 35% would favour the continuation of cotton production. This option not only respects the Cotton Protocol in the Acts of Accession of Greece, Spain and Portugal, it also adheres to the principles of the CAP reform. Further, from an administrative point of view, any upwards modification of the coupling rate would imply a reduction of the decoupling rate and, consequently, the recalculation of all the payment entitlements allocated in 2006 to the historical producers of cotton in the Member States concerned. By contrast, maintaining the 35% coupling rate would not entail any further administrative burden.
If a decoupling rate higher than 65% were to be set, it would risk the extensive disruption of the cotton sector. The Commission has, therefore, come to the conclusion that, in order to meet set objectives, the current balance between coupled and coupled support should be continued with some additional, though minor, modification to the regime. Thus, the Commission suggests that: the maximum area should remain unchanged at 450 597 ha:
370 000 ha in Greece; 70 000 ha in Spain; 360 ha in Portugal; and 10 237 ha in Bulgaria.
The level of area payment will remain unchanged and will reduced, proportionally, in the event of payment claims exceeding the maximum area of a Member State. Both the decoupled and crop-specific area payment will continue to be subject to cross-border criteria, which will lead to more environmentally friendly cotton production in an income-neutral manner. The crop specific payment will be granted per eligible hectare of cotton, on condition that the area is maintained at least until harvest, with no obligation to deliver or sell cotton. The cotton would have to meet minimum requirements of being “sound and fair” and of marketable quality.
From a budgetary point of view, for the period 2007 -2013, an additional EUR 154 million will be made available as additional Community support for measures in cotton producing regions. The national base area and the amount of aid per eligible hectare will remain unchanged compared with the current situation. However, with the decrease of the couple payment for farmers who are members of an approved inter-branch organisation from EUR 10/ha to EUR 3/ha, the amount granted to these farmers is reduced from EUR 4.4 million to EUR 1.4 million, which would offset any additional expenditure on information and promotion.
On a final point, and in response to stakeholder’s requests, the Commission is also proposing the creation of a “label of origin” to support and promote the use of EU cotton.
PURPOSE: to amend payment provisions establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.
BACKGROUND: internationally, the EU is a minor player on the world cotton market, contributing only about 2% to the world’s total production of cotton. The main producing countries are China, the USA and India. The cotton sector, despite being of limited significance to the EU as a whole (contributing only 0.15% of the final agricultural output) has strong regional importance in the two main producing Member States namely Greece and Spain. Around 76% of the EU’s total output is grown in Greece. A small amount of cotton is also grown in Bulgaria. Most farmers growing cotton are small in size (Greece 4.5 ha and Spain 11.0 ha). In Greece there are 79 700 farmers growing cotton and in Spain 9 500.
From an environmental point of view growing cotton has a number of negative side-effects. Dependent on irrigation and fertilisers, cotton is widely associated with low biodiversity and soil impoverishment. It is reliant on phytosanitary products, especially insecticides and leaf defoliants. At the processing level, a mixture of private enterprises and co-operatives convert the raw cotton into its useable state through the ginning process, which separates cotton fibres from the seed. The capacity of Spain’s 29 ginning plants, nearly half of which are co-operatives, far exceeds it production. In Greece the ginning capacity is more in balance with production and a lower proportion of plants are run by co-operatives.
In recent years the CAP has undergone a fundamental reform aimed at increasing competitiveness, stabilising farm incomes, integrating environmental concerns into agricultural policy and simplifying and strengthening decentralisation. Alongside the general reform of the CAP, the Community adopted in 2003 Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (see CNS/2003/0006 ) establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers. This sets out, amongst others, rules for the specific payment for cotton (Chapter 10a of Title 4). However, in 2006, these provisions were annulled by the European Court of Justice (case C-310/04). The Court concluded that the proportionality principle had been infringed because the EC had failed :
to carry out an impact assessment ; to consider direct labour costs in the evaluation and decision process ; and to take account of the new regime’s impact on the ginning industry which, although not included in the Protocol, is directly linked to the business of cotton production.
As a result payment provisions have been suspended until the adoption of a new Regulation.
CONTENT: on the basis of the above, the Commission is presenting an amending Regulation to Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, which takes account of the ECJ’s judgement. Prior to adopting this proposal the Commission held a round of consultation with all interested parties and commissioned an impact assessment, which was carried out in 2007.
In summary, the new cotton regime would seek:
to continue agricultural cotton activity in the EU’s cotton-producing regions; to offer support for cotton producers that is compatible with the principles applying to the reformed CAP; to offer support to cotton producers that is compatible with the EU’s WTO commitments; to stabilise and control the EU budget; to maintain the EU’s market orientation vis-à-vis the cotton sector; to reduce the impact of cotton production on the environment; and to simplify the management of the support regime for cotton producers.
To realise the above the Commission recommends that 65% of resources devoted to supporting the cotton sector before the 2004 reform should continue in the Single Payment Scheme. This will offer cotton growers stable incomes, while leaving them free to adopt to market developments. The remaining 35% will continue to be linked to cotton production, as an area payment. These coupled payments are designed to ensure the continuity of cotton growing at a level sufficient to safeguard the ginning industry in those regions where it represents an important economic activity.
Based on the results of questionnaires sent out, as well as on the conclusions of the impact assessment, the Commission proposes that, in the medium term, a coupled rate of support of about 35% would favour the continuation of cotton production. This option not only respects the Cotton Protocol in the Acts of Accession of Greece, Spain and Portugal, it also adheres to the principles of the CAP reform. Further, from an administrative point of view, any upwards modification of the coupling rate would imply a reduction of the decoupling rate and, consequently, the recalculation of all the payment entitlements allocated in 2006 to the historical producers of cotton in the Member States concerned. By contrast, maintaining the 35% coupling rate would not entail any further administrative burden.
If a decoupling rate higher than 65% were to be set, it would risk the extensive disruption of the cotton sector. The Commission has, therefore, come to the conclusion that, in order to meet set objectives, the current balance between coupled and coupled support should be continued with some additional, though minor, modification to the regime. Thus, the Commission suggests that: the maximum area should remain unchanged at 450 597 ha:
370 000 ha in Greece; 70 000 ha in Spain; 360 ha in Portugal; and 10 237 ha in Bulgaria.
The level of area payment will remain unchanged and will reduced, proportionally, in the event of payment claims exceeding the maximum area of a Member State. Both the decoupled and crop-specific area payment will continue to be subject to cross-border criteria, which will lead to more environmentally friendly cotton production in an income-neutral manner. The crop specific payment will be granted per eligible hectare of cotton, on condition that the area is maintained at least until harvest, with no obligation to deliver or sell cotton. The cotton would have to meet minimum requirements of being “sound and fair” and of marketable quality.
From a budgetary point of view, for the period 2007 -2013, an additional EUR 154 million will be made available as additional Community support for measures in cotton producing regions. The national base area and the amount of aid per eligible hectare will remain unchanged compared with the current situation. However, with the decrease of the couple payment for farmers who are members of an approved inter-branch organisation from EUR 10/ha to EUR 3/ha, the amount granted to these farmers is reduced from EUR 4.4 million to EUR 1.4 million, which would offset any additional expenditure on information and promotion.
On a final point, and in response to stakeholder’s requests, the Commission is also proposing the creation of a “label of origin” to support and promote the use of EU cotton.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2008/637
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 178 05.07.2008, p. 0001
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3593/2
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0191/2008
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0166/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0166/2008
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE404.533
- Committee draft report: PE402.793
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0274/2008
- Debate in Council: 2834
- Legislative proposal: COM(2007)0701
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)1481
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)1482
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2007)0701
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2007)0701 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)1481 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)1482 EUR-Lex
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0274/2008
- Committee draft report: PE402.793
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE404.533
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0166/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3593/2
Activities
- Ioannis GKLAVAKIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Friedrich-Wilhelm GRAEFE zu BARINGDORF
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Katerina BATZELI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nils LUNDGREN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Diamanto MANOLAKOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gérard ONESTA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- María Isabel SALINAS GARCÍA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport Gklavakis A6-0166/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
44 |
2007/0242(CNS)
2008/04/03
AGRI
44 amendments...
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 2 (2) By judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 7 September 2006 in case C-310/04 Chapter 10a of Title IV of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 was annulled for breach of the principle of proportionality, in particular with reference to the circumstance that "the Council, the author of Regulation (EC) No 864/2004, [had] not shown before the Court that in adopting the new cotton support scheme established by that regulation it actually exercised its discretion, involving the taking into consideration of all the relevant factors and circumstances of the case, including all the labour costs linked to cotton growing and the viability of the ginning undertakings, which it was necessary to take into account for assessing the profitability of that crop" and that the Court had not been enabled "to ascertain whether the Community legislature [had been] able, without exceeding the bounds of the broad discretion it enjoys in the matter, to reach the conclusion that fixing the amount of the specific aid for cotton at 35% of the total existing aid under the previous support scheme would suffice to guarantee the objective set out in recital 5 in the preamble to Regulation (EC) No 864/2004, namely to ensure th
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 3 (3) A new scheme of specific payment for cotton needs to be adopted in conformity with the Court's judgement in case C-310/04 – a scheme which, as described both in the Court’s judgement and in the objective formulated in the fifth recital of Regulation No 864/2004, should lead to profitability which will enable cotton- growing to continue on a sustainable basis.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 3 (3) A new scheme of
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 3a (new) (3a) Cotton is grown mainly in regions whose GDP is amongst the lowest in the European Union and whose economy is closely linked to agriculture. In such areas, cotton-growing and the ginning industry which supports it are prime sources of income and employment, accounting in certain cases for over 80% of activity in the area in which they are established. Furthermore, soil conditions in certain areas are such that, from an agronomic point of view, no alternative crop can be established in the short term.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 3b (new) (3b) The current cotton-aid scheme is highly specific in nature. Its roots lie in the Accession Treaties relating to Greece, Spain and Portugal and one of its objectives is to support cotton production in certain Community regions which are now dependent on that crop, to provide the producers concerned with a fair income and to stabilise the market.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 3c (new) (3c) In order to enable specific situations to be addressed with the appropriate degree of flexibility, the Member States should be able to establish a certain balance between individual aid entitlements and regional or national averages and between current payments and the single payment. Furthermore, in order to enable a Member State’s specific agricultural conditions to be taken into account, it must be possible for that Member State to request a transitional period within which to apply the single- payment scheme, though without exceeding the budget ceilings established in connection with that scheme. Should competition be seriously distorted during the transitional period and in order to ensure that the obligations entered into by the Community at international level are fulfilled, the Commission should be able to take whatever action is required in order to deal with such situations.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 4 Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 5 (5) All the relevant factors and circumstances pertaining to the specific situation of the cotton sector, including all the elements necessary to assess the profitability of that crop, should be taken into consideration. Cotton is grown in regions which still quality as convergence-objective regions for the 2007-2013 period and which have an essentially agricultural economy with few alternative crops. Furthermore, cotton- growing and the associated agri-industry are a major source of employment and wealth in those areas. To this end, an evaluation and consultation process was launched: two studies were carried out on the socio-economic and on the environmental impact on the cotton sector in the Community of the future cotton support scheme and specific seminars and an internet consultation were organised with stakeholders.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 5 (5) All the relevant factors and circumstances pertaining to the specific situation of the cotton sector, including all the elements necessary to assess the profitability of that crop, should be taken
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 6 (6)
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 8 (8) A complete integration in the single payment scheme of the support scheme operating in the cotton sector
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 8 (8) A complete integration in the single payment scheme of the support scheme in the cotton sector is likely to bring a significant risk of production disruption to the cotton producer regions of the Community.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 8a (new) (8a) With a view to enabling the Member States to tailor coupled aid to the varying circumstances under which their production takes place (thereby ensuring that the cotton-ginning industries receive a supply which is adequate in terms of quality and quantity), the Member States must be allowed to devise means of differentiating that coupled aid on the basis of objective elements such as environmental criteria, the characteristics of cotton plantations, and so on.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 9 (9) The
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 9 (9) The remaining
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 10 (10)
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 10 (10) For environmental reasons,
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 10a (new) (10a) Since there are few alternatives to cotton-growing, aid schemes must be introduced which will ensure that cotton- growing is profitable and that it continues in the European Union's producer regions. For this reason the Member States should be able to increase non- decoupled aid in cases where the area under cultivation is smaller than the base production areas (although such action must be financially neutral and a ceiling must be established for the amount of aid paid to farmers).
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 11 (11) In
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 11 (11) In order to meet the needs of the ginning industry
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 11a (new) (11a) In view of the downward trend in the Member States' cotton production, the ginning industry has entered a restructuring process which should be accompanied by appropriate support measures designed to ensure that units which are forced to redirect their production activity experience a smooth transition. For this reason a restructuring fund, financed out of the budget for the COM in cotton should be set up.
Amendment 41 #
Recital 12a (new) (12a) National support programmes should be financed mainly from funds transferred pursuant to Article 69 and from non-absorbed funds originally earmarked as non-decoupled aid.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 13a (new) (13a) In the period since the reform of the cotton sector which was approved in 2004 and nullified by the European Court of Justice (Decision C-310/04) has been in force, production has decreased considerably and all of the parties involved have consequently suffered economic loss – a loss which should be duly assessed in order to enable compensation for the losses incurred to be granted.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Recital 13a (new) (13a) In order to facilitate the transition from the previously established cotton-aid scheme to the scheme established under this Regulation, action will have to be taken in order to restructure the ginning sector.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 Regulation (EC) No. 1782/2003 Article 110a – paragraph -1 (new) Member States may decide to maintain a link with production for part of the amounts contained in Annex VIII of Regulation (EC) No. 1782/2003 and constituting all aid for cotton, i.e. decoupled aid, aid per hectare and the resources transferred to rural development in accordance with Article 143d of Regulation (EC) No.. 1782/2003. Τhat part may not exceed 50% of the aid. In such cases, the Member State concerned shall pay additional aid per hectare to farmers producing cotton in accordance with the conditions laid down in Chapter 10a of Title IV.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 Regulation (EC) No. 1782/2003 Article 110a – paragraph. 1 Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 Regulation (EC) No. 1782/2003 Article 110a – paragraph. 1a (new) A percentage of the aid may be used for measures which promote the sustainability of the sector based on specialised programmes under national schemes submitted by the producer Member States and approved by the management committee procedure. Such programmes may include crisis prevention and management policies as well as measures to enhance the sustainability of the sector which are not covered by rural development.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 Regulation (EC) 1782/2003 Article 110b – (paragraph 1) 1. The aid shall be granted per hectare of eligible area of cotton. In order to be eligible, the area shall be located on agricultural land authorised by the Member State for cotton production, sown under authorised varieties and
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 Regulation (EC) 1782/2003 Article 110b (paragraph 2a new) 2a. Producer Member States may lay down additional terms and conditions relating to the sowing, growing, harvesting and delivery of cotton to ginning industries with a view to enabling cotton-growing to continue in production areas and to prevent it from being replaced by other crops.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 Regulation (EC) No. 1782/2003 Article 110c – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 Regulation (EC) 1782/2003 Article 110c – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – Greece:
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 Regulation (EC) No. 1782/2003 Article 110c – paragraph 2 2. The total amount of
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 Regulation (EC) 1782/2003 Article 110c (paragraph 2) 2. The amount of the aid per eligible hectare shall be as follows:
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 Regulation (EC) 1782/2003 Article 110c – paragraph 2 – indent 2 – Greece: EUR
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 Regulation (EC) No. 1782/2003 Article 110c – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 Regulation (EC) 1782/2003 Article 110c – paragraph 3 – sub paragraph 2 a (new) If their production conditions so justify, the Member States may establish a percentage for aid coupled to production which may not exceed 80%.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 Regulation (EC) 1782/2003 Article 110c – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Where the admissible cotton area in a given Member State is smaller than the base area established in subparagraph 1, the aid referred to in subparagraph 2 for that Member State shall be increased in proportion to the base area which has not been covered, up to a ceiling established by means of the procedure laid down in Article 144. Any saving brought about by a fall in production shall be allocated to the national support programmes.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 Regulation (EC) No. 1782/2003 Article 110d – paragraph 1, indent 5 a (new) – market crisis management measures.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article one Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 Article 110(2) – Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article one Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 Article 110(ea) (new) – Paragraph 1 (new) Article 110(ea) National support programmes 1. National support programmes shall be established for the purpose of improving competitiveness. The Community shall determine and shall finance the eligible actions. The Member Staes shall select whatever package of measures they consider effective and which are best suited to their regional particularities. That package must include a restructuring fund for the ginning industry.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article one Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 Article 110(ea)(new) – Paragraph 2 (new) 2. The national support programmes shall be financed by means of a percentage of up to 10% of the non-decoupled aid pursuant to Article 69. That amount shall be supplemented by the appropriations which have not been absorbed by means of non-decoupled aid. The Member States shall finance a fund to be earmarked for the ginning industry in accordance with the latter's restructuring requirements.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 Regulation (EC) No. 1782/2003 Article 110e a (new) – paragraph 5 (new) 5. Policies may be funded under the national support programmes to forecast, mitigate and combat the effects of climate change on cotton-producing regions.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article one Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 Article 1a (new) Article 1a 1. In view of the effects produced within the ginning industries during the 2006/07 and 2007/08 seasons through application of the provisions in force during that period and with a view to making sure that the industry is viable in the future and consequently that cotton-growing continues, a specific plan for the restructuring of the ginning sector must be adopted, in order to enable that sector to adapt to changed circumstances. 2. Expenditure incurred in applying the ginning-sector restructuring plan shall be regarded as intervention measures intended to regularise agricultural markets, pursuant to Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005. 3. In accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 144(2), the Commission shall adopt the rules governing application of the above paragraph - in particular, the rules relating to the financial and economic aspects which are necessary in order to compensate for the reduction in the volume of raw material which may be ginned by the industry and the possible abandonment of the sector by some of the existing companies.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article one Rule (EC) No 1782/2003 Article 1(b)(new) Article 1b 1. Actions aimed at agricultural- machinery service companies affected by the drop in production shall be promoted.
source: PE-404.533
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1482/COM_SEC(2007)1482_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1482/COM_SEC(2007)1482_EN.pdf |
events/0/date |
Old
2007-11-09T00:00:00New
2007-11-08T00:00:00 |
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=CNS&year=2007&number=0242&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=CNS&year=2007&number=0242&appLng=EN |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0274)(documentyear:2008)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0274)(documentyear:2008)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.793New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE402.793 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.533New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE404.533 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0166_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0166_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14930&j=0&l=en
|
events/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0166_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0166_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080507&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080507&type=CRE |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1482/COM_SEC(2007)1482_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1482/COM_SEC(2007)1482_EN.pdf |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-166&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0166_EN.html |
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-166&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0166_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-191New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0191_EN.html |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1481/COM_SEC(2007)1481_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1481/COM_SEC(2007)1481_EN.pdf |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1482/COM_SEC(2007)1482_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1482/COM_SEC(2007)1482_EN.pdf |
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0701/COM_COM(2007)0701_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0701/COM_COM(2007)0701_EN.pdf |
events/10/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2008:178:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:178:SOM:EN:HTML |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AGRI/6/56001New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32008R0637New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32008R0637 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
procedure/title |
Old
Common agricultural policy (CAP): support schemes, national restructuring programmes for the cotton sectorNew
Common agricultural policy (CAP): support schemes, national restructuring programmes for the cotton sector |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0701/COM_COM(2007)0701_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0701/COM_COM(2007)0701_EN.pdf |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|