BETA


2007/0267(CNS) Value added tax VAT: common system, treatment of insurance and financial services

Progress: Procedure lapsed or withdrawn

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON
Committee Opinion JURI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 113

Events

2016/04/30
   EC - Proposal withdrawn by Commission
2016/04/30
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2011/12/19
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council took note of a progress report from the presidency regarding work on proposals on the value-added tax (VAT) treatment of insurance services and other financial services.

The proposals for a directive and a regulation are intended to clarify the provisions of directive 2006/112/EC as regards financial services, which are exempt from VAT. They are aimed at increasing legal certainty for economic operators and national tax administrations, reducing administrative burdens and lessening the impact of hidden VAT on the costs of service providers.

The existing provisions were established in the 1970s and have led to uneven interpretation by the member states, causing distortions of competition.

The VAT exemption for financial services causes high compliance costs, and inconsistencies in its implementation have resulted in an increasing number of court cases, especially as concerns new types of services.

The proposals date from 2007. In November 2010, the Council endorsed guidelines for work on the dossier. Under Polish presidency (July to December 2011), the working group has focused on definitions of exempt financial services.

The report provides an overview of progress achieved during that time and assesses the prospects for reaching an overall compromise on the dossier. The main conclusions may be summarised as follows:

to continue the work on the basis of the package of guidelines that would form a future compromise; or to postpone further work on the dossier until examination of the VAT strategy and proposals on the financial sector taxation, which may lead to a new impulse in this file.

During the discussion in the high level working group, the vast majority of delegations supported continuation of the work and have shown openness towards the efforts to achieve a compromise as soon as possible.

The Presidency took note of the constructive approach by the majority of delegations towards a guideline concerning a transfer of insurance and reinsurance contract portfolios, assuming that transfer of insurance and reinsurance contract portfolios and transfer of credit contract portfolios should be treated equally for VAT purposes, which would mean that both cases should be exempt from VAT . In the Presidency’s view visible progress has been achieved in the work on outsourcing, where the majority of delegations supported narrow scope of definition, accepting that exemption within outsourcing should be granted only for services of financial or insurance nature. However, a few delegations supported broader application of exemption for outsourced financial and insurance services to avoid distortions of competition of the sector.

Progress has also been made as regards the work on definition of management of investment and pension funds – the majority of Member States supported equal treatment of investment and pension funds, by application of exemption to management of funds, irrespective of their legal form and business structure, in order to avoid possible distortions of competition and not to create artificial burdens in the area of the management of those funds. However, a few Member States argued that certain types of pension funds were by their nature different from investment funds and, in their view, should not be exempt.

Further discussions are needed in this respect and the Commission’s services are currently preparing a room document on all of these issues which will be available in 2012. Some Member States again are of the opinion that the exemption should be limited to investment funds collecting savings of small investors.

During the Polish Presidency work has been carried out in relation to transactions in financial derivatives . In the opinion of the majority of Member States exemption should apply to those of a financial nature, while transactions in commodities should be recognized as taxable. Nevertheless, further work should be undertaken to investigate the tax treatment of derivatives and, in this context, the merits of the simplification for exchange traded commodities .

The relationship with the VAT strategy and proposals on the financial sector taxation was discussed. Given that the proposal on FTT was of a different nature and that the new VAT Strategy was still under preparation in the Commission, the Presidency – bearing in mind the opinion of the Commission – noted, without prejudice to the future discussions, that at this stage it was difficult to assess what impetus from these two files could be expected for further work on VAT treatment of insurance and financial services. This approach also received support during discussion at the HLWP, where the vast majority of Member States was in favour of continuation of the work on financial and insurance services without waiting for the results of the work on FTT and VAT strategy.

In the light of the constructive discussion, the Presidency remains convinced that the work aiming at reaching a compromise in this dossier should be continued.

Documents
2011/12/19
   CSL - Council Meeting
2011/06/20
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council took note of a report on progress on a draft directive and draft regulation on the value-added tax (VAT) treatment of insurance services and other financial services.

The Hungarian Presidency continued the work on the two proposals in line with the orientations received from the Council focusing, as a priority, on the definitions of exempt financial and insurance services. In the context of harmonised and modernised definition of the exemption for the management of investment funds, and as specifically requested by the Council, the Working Party examined the overall effect, as far as VAT is concerned, of the changes in the regulatory climate for these funds.

The report provides an overview of progress achieved since the beginning of the year and identifies the main issues to be addressed.

Progress made: progress has been made and a tentative agreement was reached on a number of issues including the definition of insurance and reinsurance services (except for the transfer of insurance and reinsurance contract portfolios and the processing of insurance and reinsurance claims), currency exchange, and provision of cash.

There is also an emerging agreement among the delegations that the VAT Directive should not provide for separate rules as to the tax treatment of complex supplies with an element of credit or insurance service as these would be too rigid to reflect all possible business scenarios.

Furthermore, the discussions on the positive and negative examples in the draft regulation concerning financial transfer, financial deposit taking, account operation, currency exchange, provision of cash, securities and financial derivatives are essentially drawing to a closure.

Outstanding issues: as a result of detailed discussions, the differences in Member States’ interpretation of the current rules were highlighted, but at the same time it was also revealed that delegations wished to achieve well-defined limits for the exemptions, which could pave the way for a future compromise. On the basis of these discussions, at this stage the Hungarian Presidency identified, among others, four major outstanding issues of political importance : 1) transfer of insurance and reinsurance contract portfolios; 2) outsourcing; 3) management of investment funds; 4) derivatives.

Transfer of insurance and reinsurance contract portfolios: according to the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice the transfer of insurance and reinsurance contract portfolios is a taxed transaction, while under the current VAT Directive the transfer of a portfolio of credit contracts is interpreted by most Member States as being exempt. The majority of delegations are of the view that in order to avoid distortion of competition the transfer of insurance contract portfolios should also be exempt, while others point out that this would entail the widening of the scope of the current exemption, which would not be fully in line with the initial aim of the proposal.

Outsourcing: currently, the VAT Directive does not provide rules for the VAT treatment of services outsourced by suppliers of exempt financial and insurance services. The legal uncertainties are reflected by the fact that the ECJ has ruled on several occasions in this respect, and those rulings are, to a certain extent, interpreted differently. Within the spectrum of views expressed, some delegations assert that the exemption for outsourcing should cover only those services which fulfil in effect all the specific and essential functions of an exempt financial or insurance service; other delegations would, however, exempt a wider range of services, to include those which have at least one of the core functions of financial and insurance services.

Management of investment funds: regarding management of investment funds, the main issue concerns the conditions an investment fund must meet in order for its management to be exempt. In addition, there are outstanding questions as regards which management services are covered by the exemption. The relevant ECJ rulings state that the purpose of the exemption is, particularly, to facilitate investment for small investors by means of investment undertakings, and that VAT should be fiscally neutral as regards the choice between direct investment and investment through undertakings for collective investment. Against this background, a number of Member States are of the opinion that the exemption should be limited to investment funds collecting the savings of small investors. Others argue that fiscal neutrality and competitiveness of the European fund industry would point towards inclusion of other investment funds.

Derivatives: work is still ongoing on the definition of exempt financial derivatives, on how to secure their continued exemption and on the possible introduction of a general optional tax suspension arrangement for commodity derivatives traded on regulated commodity markets.

In the opinion of the Hungarian Presidency, despite these differences there is a common understanding that a level playing field should be achieved through the modernisation of the definitions . Harmonised rules would require a careful balancing of several aspects of a complex situation (level playing field, competitiveness of the sector, budgetary implications), as these cannot always be achieved without some trade-off.

A future agreement should also take into account the ongoing work on identifying the tax base for financial services. The Hungarian Presidency underlines the need to acknowledge the eventual evolution of the VAT Strategy and the initiatives on the taxation of the financial sector.

Documents
2011/06/20
   CSL - Council Meeting
2009/06/09
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council took note of a progress report on two related proposals as regards the value added tax treatment of insurance and financial services.

Documents
2009/06/09
   CSL - Council Meeting
2008/12/02
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2008/12/02
   CSL - Council Meeting
2008/10/17
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/09/25
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2008/09/25
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted, by 493 votes to 90 with 10 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax, as regards the treatment of insurance and financial services. The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Joseph MUSCAT (PES, MT) on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs.

The main amendment – adopted under the consultation procedure – were as follows:

Principle of neutrality : Members stressed the need for a framework which provides neutral conditions in regard to the value added tax (VAT) treatment of financial products and their marketing and management.

They also stressed the aim of having a level playing field in the European Union between economic operators and Member States.

Exemptions: amongst the transactions to be exempted by Member States are exchange of currency, provision of cash and cash claims transactions, transactions concerning trading in securities and derivatives of all kinds.

Definitions: Parliament clarified the definition of 'insurance' and broadened the definition of 'investment funds'. The latter means specially constituted investment vehicles created for the sole purpose of gathering assets from investors and investing those assets in a diversified pool of assets, including pension funds and vehicles used to implement and execute collective pension schemes. The 'management of investment funds' includes at least strategic and tactical asset management and asset allocation, including advisory services, as well as currency and risk management.

Groups : with regard to the conditions to be fulfilled for Member States to exempt services supplied by a group of taxable persons to members of the group, Parliament notes that the group itself must be established in the Community. However, it should be possible for undertakings that are not resident in the EU to become members of such a group, and these groups should be able to provide services to third parties in accordance with general turnover tax principles without this affecting the principle of their tax exemption.

Services to third countries : in order to ensure a level-playing field between the banking, insurance and fund industry sector, investment fund management services provided to third countries should also be VAT deductible.

Right of option : from 1 January 2012, Member States shall allow taxable persons in each individual case a right of option for taxation in respect of one of the services referred to in the text, where that service is provided to another taxable person established in the same Member State or elsewhere in the Community. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of the right of option 3 years after entry into force of Directive .../.../EC. If appropriate, the Commission shall present a legislative proposal concerning detailed rules governing the exercise of that right of option and any other amendments of this Directive in this regard.

Transposition : Member States' transposition must ensure that end-consumers benefit from the restructuring of the present VAT arrangement.

Documents
2008/09/24
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2008/09/15
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2008/09/15
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2008/09/10
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted a report drafted by Joseph MUSCAT (PES, MT) and made some amendments to the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax, as regards the treatment of insurance and financial services.

The main amendments were as follows :

Principle of neutrality : Members stressed the need for a framework which provides neutral conditions in regard to the value added tax (VAT) treatment of financial products and their marketing and management.

They also stressed the aim of having a level playing field in the European Union between economic operators and Member States.

Exemptions: amongst the transactions to be exempted by Member States are exchange of currency, provision of cash and cash claims transactions and derivatives of all kinds. Members stated that derivatives should be exempted from turnover tax, irrespective of the underlying assets. Turnover tax liability can only arise if the performance of a transaction leads to a taxable sale.

Definitions: the committee broadened the definition of 'investment funds'. The definition of 'transactions concerning trading in securities' has been extended to include title to cash-settled financial, credit, and commodity derivatives and related options. The definition encompasses all cash-settled derivatives, whatever the nature of the assets underlying them (commodities and/or financial instruments). Members also broadened the definition of 'investment fund' , believing the Commission's proposal to be too restrictive on this point. They state that by including in the definition pension funds and vehicles used to implement and execute collective pension schemes, a level playing field is created and a distortion eliminated. The 'management of investment funds' includes advisory services.

Groups: with regard to the conditions to be fulfilled for Member States to exempt services supplied by a group of taxable persons to members of the group, the committee notes that the group itself must be established in the Community. However, it should be possible for undertakings that are not resident in the EU to become members of such a group, and these groups should be able to provide services to third parties in accordance with general turnover tax principles without this affecting the principle of their tax exemption.

Report: the Commission will report to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of the right of option 3 years after entry into force. If appropriate, the Commission shall present a legislative proposal concerning detailed rules governing the exercise of that right of option and any other amendments of Directive .../.../EC in this respect.

Transposition: Member States' transposition must ensure that end-consumers benefit from the restructuring of the present VAT arrangement. Members noted that The facilitation of procedures for businesses should not come at the cost of increased prices for consumers.

2008/06/17
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/06/03
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2008/06/03
   CSL - Council Meeting
2008/05/28
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Documents
2008/04/16
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/01/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2007/11/28
   EC - Legislative proposal
Details

PURPOSE: to amend Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax, as regards the treatment of insurance and financial services.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.

CONTENT: the Commission states that the definitions of exempt insurance and financial services in this Directive are out of date and have led to an uneven interpretation and application of these exemptions by Member States. Stakeholders are confronted with considerable legal complexity and varying administrative practices generating legal uncertainty for economic operators and fiscal authorities. This legal uncertainty has led to an increasing number of court cases and increased the administrative charges of operators and administrations for applying these exemptions. It is therefore necessary to clarify the rules governing the exemption from VAT for insurance and financial services with the aim of creating more legal certainty and reducing administrative charges for operators and administrations.

A second problem is that of hidden VAT in the cost structure of insurance and financial services. In financial services and insurance services all economic operators are striving to improve their competitiveness since they are increasingly exposed to competition both between themselves on account of the trend towards a single pan-European market place, and from economic operators established outside the EU. Consolidation within the sector has been driven to a great extent by the need for efficiency but cost reduction strategies manifest themselves in various ways. These developments are accelerated by the emergence of a wider regulatory framework for an integrated European financial services market as set out in the Financial Services Action Plan. This regulatory framework increases the competition between suppliers of insurance and financial services through the steady move towards a level playing field. In this environment, economic operators have developed various techniques for improving their own competitiveness but some of the more common basic techniques include

the following:

-outsourcing of activities (with the intention of lowering administrative and labour costs,

e.g.: depository of shares, administrative tasks etc.);

-pooling of activities (with a cost-sharing intention, e.g.: the common development of

computer systems and software for several banks, the creation of credit factories which

may either be associated with consolidation or be undertaken on the basis of);

-sub-contracting (insertion of a supplementary distribution level for the financial products or insurances).

These techniques involve less value in created in-house but supplied as services by independent third parties to the suppliers of insurance and financial products. This generates the problem that such services may no longer come under the exemption for financial and insurance services and are therefore invoiced with VAT. This VAT is often not deductible for the client because he has no right of deduction since he supplies himself exempt insurance and financial services. Such non-deductible VAT becomes part of the costs. The proposal contains elements which will reduce that impact on the costs.

Accordingly, the objectives of this proposal are twofold:

-increasing legal certainty for economic operators and national tax administrations, reducing their administrative burden for correctly applying the rules for the VAT exemption of insurance and financial services;

-reducing the impact of hidden VAT in costs of insurance and financial services providers.

These objectives are achieved by the three measures contained in the proposal:

-clarification of the rules governing the exemption from VAT for insurance and financial

services;

-broadening of the existing option for taxation by transferring the right to opt from the

Member States to the economic operators;

-introduction of a cost-sharing group which allows economic operators to pool investments and re-distribute the costs for these investments exempt from VAT from the group to its members.

Clarification of rules : clarification consists of the following elements:

-the conditions for applying the VAT exemption are based on objective economic criteria

decoupling them from an interpretation based on national private law concepts which is one of the main reasons for different interpretations in the Member States (e.g. an insurance must address a risk and provide for an indemnity or a benefit). These objective economic criteria ensure also that new services which will be developed in the future will be covered by the VAT exemption if they fulfil these criteria;

-the new rules introduce the concept that the exemption shall cover the supply of any

constituent element of an insurance or financial service, which constitutes a distinct whole

and has the specific and essential character of the exempt service concerned;

-a common harmonised concept of intermediation is introduced for insurance and financial

services;

-where possible, the new definitions also create more consistency with internal market rules (e.g. investment funds). The proposal for a Directive is accompanied by a proposal for a Regulation which enumerates in a non-exhaustive way cases which are covered by or excluded from the VAT exemption for insurance and financial services.

The option for taxation: under the broadened option for taxation, it will be the economic operator who decides if he wants to be fully taxable. Where he exercises this right, he will be able to deduct input VAT on his investments like any other economic operator. In this way a level playing field for the financial industry is created that had previously not been achieved.

At the same time Member States are given the necessary flexibility to specify the rules for applying the option, adapting it to their national tax supervision structures. Where the need arises implementing provisions could also be envisaged at Community level on the basis of Article 397 of the Directive.

Cost-sharing : under the proposed cost-sharing model, economic operators can pool

their investments (e.g.: computer technology of specialised staff) in groups which could buy these investments at better market conditions and re-distribute them exempt from VAT to the members of the group.

2007/11/28
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2007/11/28
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2007/11/27
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to amend Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax, as regards the treatment of insurance and financial services.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.

CONTENT: the Commission states that the definitions of exempt insurance and financial services in this Directive are out of date and have led to an uneven interpretation and application of these exemptions by Member States. Stakeholders are confronted with considerable legal complexity and varying administrative practices generating legal uncertainty for economic operators and fiscal authorities. This legal uncertainty has led to an increasing number of court cases and increased the administrative charges of operators and administrations for applying these exemptions. It is therefore necessary to clarify the rules governing the exemption from VAT for insurance and financial services with the aim of creating more legal certainty and reducing administrative charges for operators and administrations.

A second problem is that of hidden VAT in the cost structure of insurance and financial services. In financial services and insurance services all economic operators are striving to improve their competitiveness since they are increasingly exposed to competition both between themselves on account of the trend towards a single pan-European market place, and from economic operators established outside the EU. Consolidation within the sector has been driven to a great extent by the need for efficiency but cost reduction strategies manifest themselves in various ways. These developments are accelerated by the emergence of a wider regulatory framework for an integrated European financial services market as set out in the Financial Services Action Plan. This regulatory framework increases the competition between suppliers of insurance and financial services through the steady move towards a level playing field. In this environment, economic operators have developed various techniques for improving their own competitiveness but some of the more common basic techniques include

the following:

-outsourcing of activities (with the intention of lowering administrative and labour costs,

e.g.: depository of shares, administrative tasks etc.);

-pooling of activities (with a cost-sharing intention, e.g.: the common development of

computer systems and software for several banks, the creation of credit factories which

may either be associated with consolidation or be undertaken on the basis of);

-sub-contracting (insertion of a supplementary distribution level for the financial products or insurances).

These techniques involve less value in created in-house but supplied as services by independent third parties to the suppliers of insurance and financial products. This generates the problem that such services may no longer come under the exemption for financial and insurance services and are therefore invoiced with VAT. This VAT is often not deductible for the client because he has no right of deduction since he supplies himself exempt insurance and financial services. Such non-deductible VAT becomes part of the costs. The proposal contains elements which will reduce that impact on the costs.

Accordingly, the objectives of this proposal are twofold:

-increasing legal certainty for economic operators and national tax administrations, reducing their administrative burden for correctly applying the rules for the VAT exemption of insurance and financial services;

-reducing the impact of hidden VAT in costs of insurance and financial services providers.

These objectives are achieved by the three measures contained in the proposal:

-clarification of the rules governing the exemption from VAT for insurance and financial

services;

-broadening of the existing option for taxation by transferring the right to opt from the

Member States to the economic operators;

-introduction of a cost-sharing group which allows economic operators to pool investments and re-distribute the costs for these investments exempt from VAT from the group to its members.

Clarification of rules : clarification consists of the following elements:

-the conditions for applying the VAT exemption are based on objective economic criteria

decoupling them from an interpretation based on national private law concepts which is one of the main reasons for different interpretations in the Member States (e.g. an insurance must address a risk and provide for an indemnity or a benefit). These objective economic criteria ensure also that new services which will be developed in the future will be covered by the VAT exemption if they fulfil these criteria;

-the new rules introduce the concept that the exemption shall cover the supply of any

constituent element of an insurance or financial service, which constitutes a distinct whole

and has the specific and essential character of the exempt service concerned;

-a common harmonised concept of intermediation is introduced for insurance and financial

services;

-where possible, the new definitions also create more consistency with internal market rules (e.g. investment funds). The proposal for a Directive is accompanied by a proposal for a Regulation which enumerates in a non-exhaustive way cases which are covered by or excluded from the VAT exemption for insurance and financial services.

The option for taxation: under the broadened option for taxation, it will be the economic operator who decides if he wants to be fully taxable. Where he exercises this right, he will be able to deduct input VAT on his investments like any other economic operator. In this way a level playing field for the financial industry is created that had previously not been achieved.

At the same time Member States are given the necessary flexibility to specify the rules for applying the option, adapting it to their national tax supervision structures. Where the need arises implementing provisions could also be envisaged at Community level on the basis of Article 397 of the Directive.

Cost-sharing : under the proposed cost-sharing model, economic operators can pool

their investments (e.g.: computer technology of specialised staff) in groups which could buy these investments at better market conditions and re-distribute them exempt from VAT to the members of the group.

Documents

Votes

Rapport Muscat A6-0344/2008 - résolution #

2008/09/25 Outcome: +: 493, -: 90, 0: 10
DE PL GB ES FR IT RO HU EL BE BG SK PT NL AT FI LT SI EE IE SE MT LV DK LU CY CZ
Total
76
47
62
40
59
44
28
19
18
20
11
11
17
23
13
12
6
6
6
9
15
4
5
11
5
6
20
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
233

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3
icon: PSE PSE
166

Slovakia PSE

2

Finland PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Ireland PSE

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
70

Hungary ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
29

Lithuania UEN

1
3

Latvia UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

Poland IND/DEM

3

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19
2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (2)

5

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

3

Slovakia NI

1

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Czechia NI

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
33

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
AmendmentsDossier
44 2007/0267(CNS)
2008/06/17 ECON 44 amendments...
source: PE-407.856

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2007-11-28T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/0
date
2007-11-28T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/1
date
2007-11-28T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1554/COM_SEC(2007)1554_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1554/COM_SEC(2007)1554_EN.pdf
events/0
date
2007-11-27T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2007-11-28T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
links/National parliaments/url
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=CNS&year=2007&number=0267&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=CNS&year=2007&number=0267&appLng=EN
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1555/COM_SEC(2007)1555_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1555/COM_SEC(2007)1555_EN.pdf
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.842
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE402.842
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1002)(documentyear:2008)(documentlanguage:EN)
New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1002)(documentyear:2008)(documentlanguage:EN)
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.856
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE407.856
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0344_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0344_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16047&j=0&l=en
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0747/COM_COM(2007)0747_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0747/COM_COM(2007)0747(COR1)_EN.pdf
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0344_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0344_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080924&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080924&type=CRE
events/7
date
2008-09-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0457_EN.html title: T6-0457/2008
summary
events/7
date
2008-09-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0457_EN.html title: T6-0457/2008
summary
committees/0/date
    committees/1/date
      docs/0/docs/1/url
      Old
      http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=1554
      New
      https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=1554
      docs/1
      date
      2007-11-28T00:00:00
      docs
      type
      Document attached to the procedure
      body
      EC
      docs/1
      date
      2007-11-28T00:00:00
      docs
      type
      Document attached to the procedure
      body
      EC
      docs/5/docs/0/url
      Old
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-344&language=EN
      New
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0344_EN.html
      docs/6/body
      EC
      events/0
      date
      2007-11-28T00:00:00
      type
      Legislative proposal published
      body
      EC
      docs
      summary
      events/0
      date
      2007-11-28T00:00:00
      type
      Legislative proposal published
      body
      EC
      docs
      summary
      events/4/docs/0/url
      Old
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-344&language=EN
      New
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0344_EN.html
      events/7/docs/0/url
      Old
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-457
      New
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0457_EN.html
      activities
      • date: 2007-11-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0747/COM_COM(2007)0747(COR1)_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0747 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52007PC0747:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en.htm title: Taxation and Customs Union Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas type: Legislative proposal published
      • date: 2008-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
      • body: CSL meeting_id: 2872 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2872*&MEET_DATE=03/06/2008 type: Debate in Council title: 2872 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
      • date: 2008-09-10T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
      • date: 2008-09-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-344&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0344/2008 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
      • date: 2008-09-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080924&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
      • date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16047&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-457 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0457/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
      • body: CSL meeting_id: 2911 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2911*&MEET_DATE=02/12/2008 type: Debate in Council title: 2911 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2008-12-02T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
      • body: CSL meeting_id: 2948 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2948*&MEET_DATE=09/06/2009 type: Debate in Council title: 2948 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2009-06-09T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
      • body: CSL meeting_id: 3100 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3100*&MEET_DATE=20/06/2011 type: Debate in Council title: 3100 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2011-06-20T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
      • body: CSL meeting_id: 3139 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3139*&MEET_DATE=19/12/2011 type: Debate in Council title: 3139 council: Environment date: 2011-12-19T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
      • date: 2016-04-30T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
      • date: 2016-04-30T00:00:00 body: EC type: Proposal withdrawn by Commission commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en.htm title: Taxation and Customs Union Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
      commission
      • body: EC dg: Taxation and Customs Union commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
      committees/0
      type
      Responsible Committee
      body
      EP
      associated
      False
      committee_full
      Economic and Monetary Affairs
      committee
      ECON
      date
      committees/0
      body
      EP
      responsible
      True
      committee_full
      Economic and Monetary Affairs
      committee
      ECON
      committees/1
      type
      Committee Opinion
      body
      EP
      associated
      False
      committee_full
      Legal Affairs
      committee
      JURI
      date
      committees/1
      body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Legal Affairs
      committee
      JURI
      council
      • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Environment meeting_id: 3139 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3139*&MEET_DATE=19/12/2011 date: 2011-12-19T00:00:00
      • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 3100 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3100*&MEET_DATE=20/06/2011 date: 2011-06-20T00:00:00
      • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2948 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2948*&MEET_DATE=09/06/2009 date: 2009-06-09T00:00:00
      • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2911 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2911*&MEET_DATE=02/12/2008 date: 2008-12-02T00:00:00
      • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2872 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2872*&MEET_DATE=03/06/2008 date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00
      docs
      • date: 2007-11-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1554/COM_SEC(2007)1554_EN.pdf title: SEC(2007)1554 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=1554 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
      • date: 2007-11-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1555/COM_SEC(2007)1555_EN.pdf title: SEC(2007)1555 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=1555 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
      • date: 2008-04-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.842 title: PE402.842 type: Committee draft report body: EP
      • date: 2008-05-28T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1002)(documentyear:2008)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES1002/2008 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
      • date: 2008-06-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.856 title: PE407.856 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
      • date: 2008-09-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-344&language=EN title: A6-0344/2008 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
      • date: 2008-10-17T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=16047&j=0&l=en title: SP(2008)6073 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
      events
      • date: 2007-11-28T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0747/COM_COM(2007)0747(COR1)_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0747 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=747 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to amend Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax, as regards the treatment of insurance and financial services. PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive. CONTENT: the Commission states that the definitions of exempt insurance and financial services in this Directive are out of date and have led to an uneven interpretation and application of these exemptions by Member States. Stakeholders are confronted with considerable legal complexity and varying administrative practices generating legal uncertainty for economic operators and fiscal authorities. This legal uncertainty has led to an increasing number of court cases and increased the administrative charges of operators and administrations for applying these exemptions. It is therefore necessary to clarify the rules governing the exemption from VAT for insurance and financial services with the aim of creating more legal certainty and reducing administrative charges for operators and administrations. A second problem is that of hidden VAT in the cost structure of insurance and financial services. In financial services and insurance services all economic operators are striving to improve their competitiveness since they are increasingly exposed to competition both between themselves on account of the trend towards a single pan-European market place, and from economic operators established outside the EU. Consolidation within the sector has been driven to a great extent by the need for efficiency but cost reduction strategies manifest themselves in various ways. These developments are accelerated by the emergence of a wider regulatory framework for an integrated European financial services market as set out in the Financial Services Action Plan. This regulatory framework increases the competition between suppliers of insurance and financial services through the steady move towards a level playing field. In this environment, economic operators have developed various techniques for improving their own competitiveness but some of the more common basic techniques include the following: -outsourcing of activities (with the intention of lowering administrative and labour costs, e.g.: depository of shares, administrative tasks etc.); -pooling of activities (with a cost-sharing intention, e.g.: the common development of computer systems and software for several banks, the creation of credit factories which may either be associated with consolidation or be undertaken on the basis of); -sub-contracting (insertion of a supplementary distribution level for the financial products or insurances). These techniques involve less value in created in-house but supplied as services by independent third parties to the suppliers of insurance and financial products. This generates the problem that such services may no longer come under the exemption for financial and insurance services and are therefore invoiced with VAT. This VAT is often not deductible for the client because he has no right of deduction since he supplies himself exempt insurance and financial services. Such non-deductible VAT becomes part of the costs. The proposal contains elements which will reduce that impact on the costs. Accordingly, the objectives of this proposal are twofold: -increasing legal certainty for economic operators and national tax administrations, reducing their administrative burden for correctly applying the rules for the VAT exemption of insurance and financial services; -reducing the impact of hidden VAT in costs of insurance and financial services providers. These objectives are achieved by the three measures contained in the proposal: -clarification of the rules governing the exemption from VAT for insurance and financial services; -broadening of the existing option for taxation by transferring the right to opt from the Member States to the economic operators; -introduction of a cost-sharing group which allows economic operators to pool investments and re-distribute the costs for these investments exempt from VAT from the group to its members. Clarification of rules : clarification consists of the following elements: -the conditions for applying the VAT exemption are based on objective economic criteria decoupling them from an interpretation based on national private law concepts which is one of the main reasons for different interpretations in the Member States (e.g. an insurance must address a risk and provide for an indemnity or a benefit). These objective economic criteria ensure also that new services which will be developed in the future will be covered by the VAT exemption if they fulfil these criteria; -the new rules introduce the concept that the exemption shall cover the supply of any constituent element of an insurance or financial service, which constitutes a distinct whole and has the specific and essential character of the exempt service concerned; -a common harmonised concept of intermediation is introduced for insurance and financial services; -where possible, the new definitions also create more consistency with internal market rules (e.g. investment funds). The proposal for a Directive is accompanied by a proposal for a Regulation which enumerates in a non-exhaustive way cases which are covered by or excluded from the VAT exemption for insurance and financial services. The option for taxation: under the broadened option for taxation, it will be the economic operator who decides if he wants to be fully taxable. Where he exercises this right, he will be able to deduct input VAT on his investments like any other economic operator. In this way a level playing field for the financial industry is created that had previously not been achieved. At the same time Member States are given the necessary flexibility to specify the rules for applying the option, adapting it to their national tax supervision structures. Where the need arises implementing provisions could also be envisaged at Community level on the basis of Article 397 of the Directive. Cost-sharing : under the proposed cost-sharing model, economic operators can pool their investments (e.g.: computer technology of specialised staff) in groups which could buy these investments at better market conditions and re-distribute them exempt from VAT to the members of the group.
      • date: 2008-01-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
      • date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2872*&MEET_DATE=03/06/2008 title: 2872
      • date: 2008-09-10T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted a report drafted by Joseph MUSCAT (PES, MT) and made some amendments to the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax, as regards the treatment of insurance and financial services. The main amendments were as follows : Principle of neutrality : Members stressed the need for a framework which provides neutral conditions in regard to the value added tax (VAT) treatment of financial products and their marketing and management. They also stressed the aim of having a level playing field in the European Union between economic operators and Member States. Exemptions: amongst the transactions to be exempted by Member States are exchange of currency, provision of cash and cash claims transactions and derivatives of all kinds. Members stated that derivatives should be exempted from turnover tax, irrespective of the underlying assets. Turnover tax liability can only arise if the performance of a transaction leads to a taxable sale. Definitions: the committee broadened the definition of 'investment funds'. The definition of 'transactions concerning trading in securities' has been extended to include title to cash-settled financial, credit, and commodity derivatives and related options. The definition encompasses all cash-settled derivatives, whatever the nature of the assets underlying them (commodities and/or financial instruments). Members also broadened the definition of 'investment fund' , believing the Commission's proposal to be too restrictive on this point. They state that by including in the definition pension funds and vehicles used to implement and execute collective pension schemes, a level playing field is created and a distortion eliminated. The 'management of investment funds' includes advisory services. Groups: with regard to the conditions to be fulfilled for Member States to exempt services supplied by a group of taxable persons to members of the group, the committee notes that the group itself must be established in the Community. However, it should be possible for undertakings that are not resident in the EU to become members of such a group, and these groups should be able to provide services to third parties in accordance with general turnover tax principles without this affecting the principle of their tax exemption. Report: the Commission will report to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of the right of option 3 years after entry into force. If appropriate, the Commission shall present a legislative proposal concerning detailed rules governing the exercise of that right of option and any other amendments of Directive .../.../EC in this respect. Transposition: Member States' transposition must ensure that end-consumers benefit from the restructuring of the present VAT arrangement. Members noted that The facilitation of procedures for businesses should not come at the cost of increased prices for consumers.
      • date: 2008-09-15T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-344&language=EN title: A6-0344/2008
      • date: 2008-09-24T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080924&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
      • date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16047&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
      • date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-457 title: T6-0457/2008 summary: The European Parliament adopted, by 493 votes to 90 with 10 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax, as regards the treatment of insurance and financial services. The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Joseph MUSCAT (PES, MT) on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. The main amendment – adopted under the consultation procedure – were as follows: Principle of neutrality : Members stressed the need for a framework which provides neutral conditions in regard to the value added tax (VAT) treatment of financial products and their marketing and management. They also stressed the aim of having a level playing field in the European Union between economic operators and Member States. Exemptions: amongst the transactions to be exempted by Member States are exchange of currency, provision of cash and cash claims transactions, transactions concerning trading in securities and derivatives of all kinds. Definitions: Parliament clarified the definition of 'insurance' and broadened the definition of 'investment funds'. The latter means specially constituted investment vehicles created for the sole purpose of gathering assets from investors and investing those assets in a diversified pool of assets, including pension funds and vehicles used to implement and execute collective pension schemes. The 'management of investment funds' includes at least strategic and tactical asset management and asset allocation, including advisory services, as well as currency and risk management. Groups : with regard to the conditions to be fulfilled for Member States to exempt services supplied by a group of taxable persons to members of the group, Parliament notes that the group itself must be established in the Community. However, it should be possible for undertakings that are not resident in the EU to become members of such a group, and these groups should be able to provide services to third parties in accordance with general turnover tax principles without this affecting the principle of their tax exemption. Services to third countries : in order to ensure a level-playing field between the banking, insurance and fund industry sector, investment fund management services provided to third countries should also be VAT deductible. Right of option : from 1 January 2012, Member States shall allow taxable persons in each individual case a right of option for taxation in respect of one of the services referred to in the text, where that service is provided to another taxable person established in the same Member State or elsewhere in the Community. The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the operation of the right of option 3 years after entry into force of Directive .../.../EC. If appropriate, the Commission shall present a legislative proposal concerning detailed rules governing the exercise of that right of option and any other amendments of this Directive in this regard. Transposition : Member States' transposition must ensure that end-consumers benefit from the restructuring of the present VAT arrangement.
      • date: 2008-12-02T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2911*&MEET_DATE=02/12/2008 title: 2911
      • date: 2009-06-09T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2948*&MEET_DATE=09/06/2009 title: 2948 summary: The Council took note of a progress report on two related proposals as regards the value added tax treatment of insurance and financial services.
      • date: 2011-06-20T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3100*&MEET_DATE=20/06/2011 title: 3100 summary: The Council took note of a report on progress on a draft directive and draft regulation on the value-added tax (VAT) treatment of insurance services and other financial services. The Hungarian Presidency continued the work on the two proposals in line with the orientations received from the Council focusing, as a priority, on the definitions of exempt financial and insurance services. In the context of harmonised and modernised definition of the exemption for the management of investment funds, and as specifically requested by the Council, the Working Party examined the overall effect, as far as VAT is concerned, of the changes in the regulatory climate for these funds. The report provides an overview of progress achieved since the beginning of the year and identifies the main issues to be addressed. Progress made: progress has been made and a tentative agreement was reached on a number of issues including the definition of insurance and reinsurance services (except for the transfer of insurance and reinsurance contract portfolios and the processing of insurance and reinsurance claims), currency exchange, and provision of cash. There is also an emerging agreement among the delegations that the VAT Directive should not provide for separate rules as to the tax treatment of complex supplies with an element of credit or insurance service as these would be too rigid to reflect all possible business scenarios. Furthermore, the discussions on the positive and negative examples in the draft regulation concerning financial transfer, financial deposit taking, account operation, currency exchange, provision of cash, securities and financial derivatives are essentially drawing to a closure. Outstanding issues: as a result of detailed discussions, the differences in Member States’ interpretation of the current rules were highlighted, but at the same time it was also revealed that delegations wished to achieve well-defined limits for the exemptions, which could pave the way for a future compromise. On the basis of these discussions, at this stage the Hungarian Presidency identified, among others, four major outstanding issues of political importance : 1) transfer of insurance and reinsurance contract portfolios; 2) outsourcing; 3) management of investment funds; 4) derivatives. Transfer of insurance and reinsurance contract portfolios: according to the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice the transfer of insurance and reinsurance contract portfolios is a taxed transaction, while under the current VAT Directive the transfer of a portfolio of credit contracts is interpreted by most Member States as being exempt. The majority of delegations are of the view that in order to avoid distortion of competition the transfer of insurance contract portfolios should also be exempt, while others point out that this would entail the widening of the scope of the current exemption, which would not be fully in line with the initial aim of the proposal. Outsourcing: currently, the VAT Directive does not provide rules for the VAT treatment of services outsourced by suppliers of exempt financial and insurance services. The legal uncertainties are reflected by the fact that the ECJ has ruled on several occasions in this respect, and those rulings are, to a certain extent, interpreted differently. Within the spectrum of views expressed, some delegations assert that the exemption for outsourcing should cover only those services which fulfil in effect all the specific and essential functions of an exempt financial or insurance service; other delegations would, however, exempt a wider range of services, to include those which have at least one of the core functions of financial and insurance services. Management of investment funds: regarding management of investment funds, the main issue concerns the conditions an investment fund must meet in order for its management to be exempt. In addition, there are outstanding questions as regards which management services are covered by the exemption. The relevant ECJ rulings state that the purpose of the exemption is, particularly, to facilitate investment for small investors by means of investment undertakings, and that VAT should be fiscally neutral as regards the choice between direct investment and investment through undertakings for collective investment. Against this background, a number of Member States are of the opinion that the exemption should be limited to investment funds collecting the savings of small investors. Others argue that fiscal neutrality and competitiveness of the European fund industry would point towards inclusion of other investment funds. Derivatives: work is still ongoing on the definition of exempt financial derivatives, on how to secure their continued exemption and on the possible introduction of a general optional tax suspension arrangement for commodity derivatives traded on regulated commodity markets. In the opinion of the Hungarian Presidency, despite these differences there is a common understanding that a level playing field should be achieved through the modernisation of the definitions . Harmonised rules would require a careful balancing of several aspects of a complex situation (level playing field, competitiveness of the sector, budgetary implications), as these cannot always be achieved without some trade-off. A future agreement should also take into account the ongoing work on identifying the tax base for financial services. The Hungarian Presidency underlines the need to acknowledge the eventual evolution of the VAT Strategy and the initiatives on the taxation of the financial sector.
      • date: 2011-12-19T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3139*&MEET_DATE=19/12/2011 title: 3139 summary: The Council took note of a progress report from the presidency regarding work on proposals on the value-added tax (VAT) treatment of insurance services and other financial services. The proposals for a directive and a regulation are intended to clarify the provisions of directive 2006/112/EC as regards financial services, which are exempt from VAT. They are aimed at increasing legal certainty for economic operators and national tax administrations, reducing administrative burdens and lessening the impact of hidden VAT on the costs of service providers. The existing provisions were established in the 1970s and have led to uneven interpretation by the member states, causing distortions of competition. The VAT exemption for financial services causes high compliance costs, and inconsistencies in its implementation have resulted in an increasing number of court cases, especially as concerns new types of services. The proposals date from 2007. In November 2010, the Council endorsed guidelines for work on the dossier. Under Polish presidency (July to December 2011), the working group has focused on definitions of exempt financial services. The report provides an overview of progress achieved during that time and assesses the prospects for reaching an overall compromise on the dossier. The main conclusions may be summarised as follows: to continue the work on the basis of the package of guidelines that would form a future compromise; or to postpone further work on the dossier until examination of the VAT strategy and proposals on the financial sector taxation, which may lead to a new impulse in this file. During the discussion in the high level working group, the vast majority of delegations supported continuation of the work and have shown openness towards the efforts to achieve a compromise as soon as possible. The Presidency took note of the constructive approach by the majority of delegations towards a guideline concerning a transfer of insurance and reinsurance contract portfolios, assuming that transfer of insurance and reinsurance contract portfolios and transfer of credit contract portfolios should be treated equally for VAT purposes, which would mean that both cases should be exempt from VAT . In the Presidency’s view visible progress has been achieved in the work on outsourcing, where the majority of delegations supported narrow scope of definition, accepting that exemption within outsourcing should be granted only for services of financial or insurance nature. However, a few delegations supported broader application of exemption for outsourced financial and insurance services to avoid distortions of competition of the sector. Progress has also been made as regards the work on definition of management of investment and pension funds – the majority of Member States supported equal treatment of investment and pension funds, by application of exemption to management of funds, irrespective of their legal form and business structure, in order to avoid possible distortions of competition and not to create artificial burdens in the area of the management of those funds. However, a few Member States argued that certain types of pension funds were by their nature different from investment funds and, in their view, should not be exempt. Further discussions are needed in this respect and the Commission’s services are currently preparing a room document on all of these issues which will be available in 2012. Some Member States again are of the opinion that the exemption should be limited to investment funds collecting savings of small investors. During the Polish Presidency work has been carried out in relation to transactions in financial derivatives . In the opinion of the majority of Member States exemption should apply to those of a financial nature, while transactions in commodities should be recognized as taxable. Nevertheless, further work should be undertaken to investigate the tax treatment of derivatives and, in this context, the merits of the simplification for exchange traded commodities . The relationship with the VAT strategy and proposals on the financial sector taxation was discussed. Given that the proposal on FTT was of a different nature and that the new VAT Strategy was still under preparation in the Commission, the Presidency – bearing in mind the opinion of the Commission – noted, without prejudice to the future discussions, that at this stage it was difficult to assess what impetus from these two files could be expected for further work on VAT treatment of insurance and financial services. This approach also received support during discussion at the HLWP, where the vast majority of Member States was in favour of continuation of the work on financial and insurance services without waiting for the results of the work on FTT and VAT strategy. In the light of the constructive discussion, the Presidency remains convinced that the work aiming at reaching a compromise in this dossier should be continued.
      • date: 2016-04-30T00:00:00 type: Proposal withdrawn by Commission body: EC
      • date: 2016-04-30T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
      other
      • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
      • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en.htm title: Taxation and Customs Union commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
      procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
      Old
      ECON/6/56997
      New
      • ECON/6/56997
      procedure/instrument
      Old
      Directive
      New
      • Directive
      • Amending Directive 2006/112/EC, VAT Directive 2004/0079(CNS)
      procedure/subject
      Old
      • 2.70.02 Indirect taxation, VAT, excise duties
      New
      2.70.02
      Indirect taxation, VAT, excise duties
      procedure/summary
      • Amending Directive 2006/112/EC, VAT Directive
      procedure/title
      Old
      Value added tax VAT: common system, treatment of insurance and financial services
      New
      Value added tax VAT: common system, treatment of insurance and financial services
      activities/0/docs/0/url
      Old
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0747/COM_COM(2007)0747_EN.pdf
      New
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0747/COM_COM(2007)0747(COR1)_EN.pdf
      activities/1/committees/0/date
      2008-01-15T00:00:00
      activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur
      • group: PSE name: MUSCAT Joseph
      activities/3/committees/0/date
      2008-01-15T00:00:00
      activities/3/committees/0/rapporteur
      • group: PSE name: MUSCAT Joseph
      activities/4/committees/0/date
      2008-01-15T00:00:00
      activities/4/committees/0/rapporteur
      • group: PSE name: MUSCAT Joseph
      activities/11
      date
      2016-04-30T00:00:00
      body
      EP
      type
      End of procedure in Parliament
      activities/12
      date
      2016-04-30T00:00:00
      body
      EC
      type
      Proposal withdrawn by Commission
      commission
      DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en.htm title: Taxation and Customs Union Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
      committees/0/date
      2008-01-15T00:00:00
      committees/0/rapporteur
      • group: PSE name: MUSCAT Joseph
      procedure/stage_reached
      Old
      Awaiting final decision
      New
      Procedure lapsed or withdrawn
      activities/0/docs/0/url
      Old
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0747/COM_COM(2007)0747(COR1)_EN.pdf
      New
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0747/COM_COM(2007)0747_EN.pdf
      activities/0/docs/0/url
      Old
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0747/COM_COM(2007)0747_EN.pdf
      New
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0747/COM_COM(2007)0747(COR1)_EN.pdf
      activities/0/docs/0/celexid
      CELEX:52007PC0747:EN
      activities/0/docs/0/celexid
      CELEX:52007PC0747:EN
      activities/0/docs/0/celexid
      CELEX:52007PC0747:EN
      activities/0/docs/0/celexid
      CELEX:52007PC0747:EN
      links/European Commission/title
      Old
      PreLex
      New
      EUR-Lex
      activities
      • date: 2007-11-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0747/COM_COM(2007)0747_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0747 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52007PC0747:EN body: EC type: Legislative proposal published commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en.htm title: Taxation and Customs Union Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
      • date: 2008-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2008-01-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: MUSCAT Joseph body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
      • body: CSL meeting_id: 2872 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2872*&MEET_DATE=03/06/2008 type: Debate in Council title: 2872 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2008-06-03T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
      • date: 2008-09-10T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2008-01-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: MUSCAT Joseph body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
      • date: 2008-09-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-344&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0344/2008 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2008-01-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: MUSCAT Joseph body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
      • date: 2008-09-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080924&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
      • date: 2008-09-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16047&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-457 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0457/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
      • body: CSL meeting_id: 2911 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2911*&MEET_DATE=02/12/2008 type: Debate in Council title: 2911 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2008-12-02T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
      • body: CSL meeting_id: 2948 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2948*&MEET_DATE=09/06/2009 type: Debate in Council title: 2948 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2009-06-09T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
      • body: CSL meeting_id: 3100 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3100*&MEET_DATE=20/06/2011 type: Debate in Council title: 3100 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2011-06-20T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
      • body: CSL meeting_id: 3139 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3139*&MEET_DATE=19/12/2011 type: Debate in Council title: 3139 council: Environment date: 2011-12-19T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
      committees
      • body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 2008-01-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: MUSCAT Joseph
      • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
      links
      National parliaments
      European Commission
      other
      • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
      • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/index_en.htm title: Taxation and Customs Union commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      ECON/6/56997
      reference
      2007/0267(CNS)
      subtype
      Legislation
      legal_basis
      Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 113
      stage_reached
      Awaiting final decision
      summary
      Amending Directive 2006/112/EC, VAT Directive
      instrument
      Directive
      title
      Value added tax VAT: common system, treatment of insurance and financial services
      type
      CNS - Consultation procedure
      subject
      2.70.02 Indirect taxation, VAT, excise duties