BETA


2007/2043(DEC) 2006 discharge: EC general budget, Committee of the Regions

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT LUNDGREN Nils (icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM)
Committee Opinion PETI
Committee Opinion REGI
Committee Opinion AFCO
Committee Opinion DEVE
Committee Opinion CULT
Committee Opinion AFET
Committee Opinion PECH
Committee Opinion AGRI
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion BUDG
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion LIBE
Committee Opinion INTA
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion FEMM
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 100

Events

2009/03/31
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the CoR for the financial year 2006.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2009/194/EC of the European Parliament on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2006 (Section VII - Committee of the Regions).

CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants the Secretary-General of the Committee of the Regions discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2006.

This decision is in line with the European Parliament’s resolution adopted on 22 April 2008 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 22/04/2008).

2008/05/28
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/04/22
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2008/04/22
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2008/04/22
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted, by 623 votes in favour, 42 against and 14 abstentions, a Decision to grant the Committee of the Regions' Secretary-General discharge in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2006. The decision to grant discharge also constitutes closure of the accounts of this institution.

At the same time, the Parliament adopted by 626 votes in favour, 46 against and 15 abstentions, a Resolution containing the comments which form part of the decision giving discharge. The report had been tabled for plenary by Nils LUNDGREN (ID, SE) on behalf of the Committee on Budgetary Control.

The Resolution recalls that the Committee of the Regions (CoR) had the following appropriations available to assure its functions in 2006: EUR 74 391 953 in commitment appropriations (compared to EUR 69 570 456 in 2005) with a utilisation rate of 97.94%.

Overall, the Parliament welcomes the signature, in 2007, of a new Administrative Cooperation Agreement between the EESC and the CoR for the period 2008 to 2014, believing that cooperation between the two institutions will be financially advantageous for the European taxpayer. It notes that the new Agreement keeps the most important areas (infrastructures, IT and telecommunications as well as translation, including the production of documents) within the Joint Services' remit, while a limited number of services are de-coupled (such as internal services, socio-medical service, the library and prepress) - this de-coupling should be budget neutral. It urges the two Committees to carry out a joint analysis of this Cooperation Agreement as part of the mid-term review, as well as the effect of the decoupling of certain services on the resources of these two institutions.

The Parliament makes a series of observations which can be summarised as follows:

Procurement : the Parliament notes the worryingly high percentage of negotiated procedures, instead of calls for tenders, for allocating certain services to this institution. Regretting this situation, the Parliament welcomes the creation, within the Joint Services, of a Contracts Unit providing assistance to all operational departments in the Joint Services in the area of public procurement; Controls : the Parliament notes that the CoR requested all its services to verify 5% of all files in 2007. Therefore, on the whole, the CoR has significantly increased its resources and capacities in its financial verification service., which is welcomed by the Parliament since it considers it crucial that the controls carried out are rigorous; Members’ travel expenses : the Parliament returns to the issue of the amounts refunded to members for travel expenditure (air tickets) on the basis of hand-written travel agency invoices, which were on average 83% higher than the price actually charged by the airline for the ticket used. The Parliament notes that, following this, the CoR's administration carried out a broad investigation into the matter, which was completed in July 2007 and whose results did not demonstrate that the amounts paid for administrative costs were justified. At the same time, the CoR decided to make further reimbursements subject to compliance with a number of conditions and suspended all reimbursements based on travel documents purchased under the previous arrangements. The CoR also informed OLAF about the evolution of the dossier; Salary transfers : the Parliament also considers the salary transfers made in 2006. Following an investigation, OLAF established that eight transfers were not in compliance with statutory conditions and recommended recovering the amounts overpaid from the officials concerned, as well as the opening of disciplinary proceedings for some of them. Subsequently, the files of five of them were submitted to the Belgian authorities and all the undue amounts were reimbursed. The Parliament notes that the CoR Appointing Authority lifted the immunity of the officials concerned. More generally, the Parliament considers that there should be strict prosecution of all cases of fraudulent behaviour.

Documents
2008/04/22
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2008/04/01
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2008/04/01
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2008/03/26
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Nils LUNDGREN (ID, SE) advising the Parliament to grant the Committee of the Regions' Secretary-General discharge in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2006.

Firstly, the parliamentary committee notes that the Committee of the Regions (CoR) had the following appropriations available to assure its functions in 2006: EUR 74 391 953 in commitment appropriations (compared to EUR 69 570 456 in 2005) with a utilisation rate of 97.94%.

Overall, MEPs welcome the signature, in December 2007, of a new Administrative Cooperation Agreement between the EESC and the CoR for the period 2008 to 2014, believing that cooperation between the two institutions will be financially advantageous for the European taxpayer. They note that the new Agreement keeps the most important areas (infrastructures, IT and telecommunications as well as translation, including the production of documents) within the Joint Services' remit, while a limited number of services are de-coupled (such as internal services, socio-medical service, the library and prepress). MEPs believe that this de-coupling should be budget neutral. They, therefore, urge the two Committees to carry out a joint analysis of this Cooperation Agreement and the decoupling of certain services as part of the mid-term review, in order to assess whether this shift of resources will have been beneficial to both. They also call on the two Committees to keep Parliament informed of the mini-cooperation agreements in the areas concerned by de-coupling.

Procurement : like the Court of Auditors, MEPs note the management and control weaknesses in relation to public procurement and, notably, the high percentage of negotiated procedures, instead of calls for tenders, even though for the majority of building-related services (that were previously awarded after negotiated procedures) new contracts have been signed after calls for tender or call for tender procedures are on-going. In this context, MEPs welcome the creation, within the Joint Services, of a Contracts Unit providing assistance to all operational departments in the Joint Services in the area of public procurement.

Building policy : MEPs note that, according to the Joint Services' answers to the rapporteur's questionnaire, with the occupation of the Remorqueur and Van Maerlant buildings in 2007, 92% of the Committees' total office space is now occupied and their needs for space have been satisfied for the coming years.

Controls : MEPs note that the verification service was transferred in 2006 from the Budget and Finance unit to the General Administration unit of the CoR, with a view to further emphasising the principle of the separation of functions and the independence of that service. The CoR also requested all its services to verify 5% of all files in 2007. Therefore, on the whole, the CoR has significantly increased its resources and capacities in its financial verification service. MEPs welcome this progress as they consider it crucial that the controls carried out are rigorous.

Members’ travel expenses : MEPs return to the issue of the amounts refunded to members for travel expenditure (air tickets) on the basis of hand-written travel agency invoices, which were on average 83% higher than the price actually charged by the airline for the ticket used. MEPs note that, following this, the CoR's administration carried out a broad investigation into the matter, which was completed in July 2007 and whose results did not demonstrate that the amounts paid for administrative costs were justified. At the same time, the CoR decided to make further reimbursements subject to compliance with a number of conditions and suspended all reimbursements based on travel documents purchased under the previous arrangements. The CoR also informed OLAF about the evolution of the dossier.

Salary transfers : MEPs also consider the salary transfers made in 2006. Following an investigation, OLAF established that eight transfers were not in compliance with statutory conditions and recommended recovering the amounts overpaid from the officials concerned, as well as the opening of disciplinary proceedings for some of them. Subsequently, the files of five of them were submitted to the Belgian authorities and all the undue amounts were reimbursed. MEPs note that, following a request by the Belgian authorities, the CoR Appointing Authority lifted the immunity of the officials concerned to enable them to be interviewed by the authorities. At the same time, an administrative enquiry was launched by the CoR's Secretary-General and in two of the five cases the Appointing Authority will take its decision on the opening of disciplinary proceedings, as soon as it has received the necessary information as to the follow-up the Belgian authorities intend to give to those files. In a further case OLAF decided to address a warning to the official concerned.

Regarding the overall dossier, MEPs reiterate their demand for a strict prosecution of all cases of fraudulent behaviour. They also welcome the fact that the weaknesses observed in terms of control (shortcomings in the separation of initiation services and internal verification of controls) resulted in a positive outcome within the CoR.

2008/03/07
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/02/12
   CSL - Council Meeting
2008/02/06
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2007/11/15
   CofA - Court of Auditors: opinion, report
Details

PURPOSE: to present the Court of Auditor’s report on the implementation of the 2006 budget (other institutions – Committee of the Regions - CoR).

CONTENT: in its annual report for the financial year 2006, the Court evaluates the legality and regularity of operating expenditure of the institutions. While, on the whole, all the institutions put in place a satisfactory monitoring and control framework in 2006, the Court notes a certain number of weaknesses in terms of the procurement procedures of the institutions (particularly a lack of competition between tenderers in the case of negotiated procedures). In particular, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions largely disregarded the limited extent to which the negotiated procedure can be used according to the Financial Regulation. This can result in an increased risk for the legality and regularity of the expenditure.

Audit of the EESC and the Committee of the Regions : the examination of a sample of negotiated procurement procedures and contracts managed by the ‘Joint Services’ of the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions revealed management and control weaknesses. In 2006 the expenditure relating to contracts resulting from a negotiated procedure, instead of a call for tenders, was a high percentage of the whole expenditure for procurement. For budget lines ‘insurance’, ‘water, gas, electricity and heating’, ‘cleaning and maintenance’ and ‘new purchases of technical equipment and installations’, this percentage exceeded 50 % of the total of the appropriations committed, which amounted to EUR 6.4 million. This practice does not comply with the general rule, set out in Article 89 of the Financial Regulation, that “all procurement contracts shall be put to tender on the broadest possible base”. The negotiated procedure is an exception applicable only within the strict limits set out in Articles 126, 127 and 129 of the Implementing Rules to the Financial Regulation (IR).

Furthermore, in negotiated procedures the number of candidates invited to negotiate or to tender may not be less than three, provided that a sufficient number of candidates satisfy the selection criteria, and the number of candidates invited to tender must be sufficient to ensure genuine competition. For 70% of the contracts examined during the audit, a tender was requested from only one potential supplier. The Court considers that for most of these contracts (with a total value of EUR 1.8 million), it would have been possible to request tenders from more than one supplier.

In addition, the Court notes that the proportion of negotiated procedures in relation to the number of contracts awarded by the authorising officer by delegation responsible for ‘investments in immovable property, rental of buildings and associated costs’ and ‘movable property and associated costs’ of the budget, had increased significantly in relation to earlier years. As far as March 2007, the authorising officer had not reported to the Institution setting out any measures taken to reverse that trend, as required by the Implementing Rules to the Financial Regulation.

The Committee of the Regions is also involved in a series of anomalies concerning refunded travel costs of its members: according to the Committee’s rules, its Members may be refunded travel expenses for the cost of the flight tickets actually paid. Administrative costs incurred for the purchase of such tickets are reimbursed on presentation of the travel agency invoice. In various cases, travel expenditure was refunded on the basis of hand-written travel agency invoices always showing the same amount. In the context of an ex post verification procedure, the Committee’s administration found that this amount was on average 83 % higher than the price charged by the airline for the ticket used. There was no evidence of the actual administrative cost invoiced for the purchase. The Committee’s administration carried out a broad investigation into the matter, which was completed in July 2007. In the Court’s opinion the results of this investigation do not demonstrate that the amounts paid for administrative costs were justified.

Replies of the Committee of the Regions : the Committee of the Regions has noted the comments of the Court in relation to contracts managed by the Joint Services with the EESC and is committed to improving financial management practices and methods in the Joint Services. In this regard, the Secretary General of the CoR has written to the Secretary General of the EESC proposing the implementation of a number of corrective measures, particularly in the area of financial circuits and tendering procedures. It is hoped that these measures can be implemented by agreement between the two Committees as soon as possible.

Regarding the issue of refunded travel costs of its members, the Court notes that, in order to guarantee full transparency, the Committee has subjected further reimbursements to compliance with a number of conditions. It has also requested the members concerned to cease travelling under the previous arrangements (full flexibility of tickets, thus increasing the cost) and to ensure that their reimbursement claims reflect the actual price indicated on the flight ticket issued.

2007/10/25
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2007/03/30
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: to present the final annual accounts of the European Communities for the financial year 2006 – Other institutions: section VII – Committee of the Regions.

CONTENT: this document sets out the amount of expenditure and the financial statement of the Committee of the Regions (CoR) for 2006 and presents an analysis of its financial management.

The appropriations available for the CoR budget for the financial year 2006 amounted to EUR 63.363 million . Appropriations committed amounted to EUR 61.97 million – 97.8% of the budget – and appropriations paid amounted to 85.5%.

Main axes of 2006 expenditure : the year was mainly characterised by the organisation of the fourth European Week of Regions and Cities (9-12 October 2006 with some 5 000 participants). On 6 May 2006, the CoR also contributed to organising EU Open Days and welcomed some 4 500 visitors. Moreover, the CoR Bureau organised five ordinary meetings and two extraordinary sessions in Innsbruck (Austria) and Turku (Finland).

In terms of financial management, 2006 also marked a turning point with the presentation, for the first time, of an activity report that takes account of the financial implementation of actions undertaken, in accordance with the Control Standards, as required by the Financial Regulation.

The other main axes of CoR expenditure can be summarised as follows:

Consultative work : the majority of the CoR’s work, as in the past, involved assisting the other institutions in their analysis of pending legislation. 2006 cannot, however, be considered a typical year, to the extent that the CoR’s Commissions only really worked for 8 of the 12 months, as a result of the CoR’s renewal. Two main units/commissions carry out this consultative work: UNIT 1 which focuses on the organisation and coordination of work with local authorities (22 opinions; 18 meetings; 3 working groups; 4 external conferences) and UNIT 2 which focuses on European governance, justice and home affairs, development cooperation and the EU’s external policy (19 opinions; 17 meetings; 6 external seminars; 7 meetings of working groups and local election observation missions). Lastly, UNIT 3 focuses on policy analysis, studies and inter-institutional legislative planning; Activity in addition to consultative work : in addition to consultative work, the CoR carries out communication work and acts as an intermediary with the press. In 2006, most of the CoR’s activities involved raising its profile and increasing its political impact, strengthening links with regional representatives, organising events (such as “Meeting Place on Europe’s Regions and Cities”), publishing documents for the general public, improving its intranet and external website, etc. In 2006, the most noteworthy actions, other than organising the EU Open Days on 6 May, include the organisation of public conferences and the opening of the headquarters to some 10 000 visitors (mostly officials and students).

Other notable points regarding the budgetary implementation of the CoR can be summarised as follows:

Title I (staff expenditure): EUR 44.285 million , 98.93% of which was committed and 91.56% paid. The Institution’s budget was on the whole respected, but large differences were noted in the implementation of certain areas of the budget, such as:

travel expenses : in 2006, the item for travel expenses required a transfer of appropriations to the amount of EUR 80 000, and almost all the appropriations made available for this item (including the transfer of appropriations) were used (98% of the amount available); the transfer of appropriations was necessary due to insufficient appropriations to meet needs and to take account of the different indexations of basic amounts (not indexed since 2004); entertainment and representation expenses : only 39% of expenses were actually paid (whereas 99% of appropriations provided for had been committed): these are mostly expenses of national delegations which recorded a (large) payment deficit; inter-institutional cooperation : in decline, with a payment rate of 28% (compared to commitments in the order of 98%). The most striking payment deficit was in the interpretation and translation services. With regard to interpretation, under-implementation is related to the reduction in the number of interpreters at meetings and the fact that distance interpretation was not used. As for translation, the costs decreased considerably compared to 2005 and were limited to EUR 71 000, of which 71.4% was used. In general, these amounts are used to tackle situations where there is an overload of work and they constitute a reserve capacity. Moreover, demand was very low for the first three quarters of the year following the renewal of the CoR and the limits on the size of documents to be translated. As this information was not known from the beginning, the rate of under-utilisation can be easily explained.

Title II (administrative expenditure): EUR 19.1 million , of which 95% was committed and 71% paid. This budgetary item was mostly characterised by a reduction in travel expenses and meeting expenses (particularly for candidate country observers – Bulgaria and Romania – and for speakers). The quite low rate of implementation can be explained by the fact that these observers and certain external speakers made use of low cost tickets. In this context, note that the CoR authorities have put several applications for refunds on hold due to a lack of supporting documentation (for travel costs, costs of studies or costs related to speakers’ meetings).

With regard to buildings policy, 2006 was mainly characterised by the purchase of furnishings to finalise the move to new buildings (Remorqueur and Van Maerlant). A large proportion of the furnishings was delivered in 2007 (but ordered in 2006).

Once again, note a net under-implementation of costs of hiring vehicles (official cars).

Transfer of appropriations : lastly, the document notes several transfers of appropriations between budget items or articles, including: (i) a transfer of appropriations to finance the CoR’s contribution to the funding of the Council crèche (which may also be used by children of CoR officials); (ii) a transfer to finance contractual agents; (iii) a transfer to finance the additional costs related to allowances for permanent or temporary staff; (iv) a transfer of appropriations (“mopping up”) in order to prepare in advance for the costs involved in fitting-out the Remorqueur building (EUR 1.2 million).

2007/03/29
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to present the final annual accounts of the European Communities for the financial year 2006 – Other institutions: section VII – Committee of the Regions.

CONTENT: this document sets out the amount of expenditure and the financial statement of the Committee of the Regions (CoR) for 2006 and presents an analysis of its financial management.

The appropriations available for the CoR budget for the financial year 2006 amounted to EUR 63.363 million . Appropriations committed amounted to EUR 61.97 million – 97.8% of the budget – and appropriations paid amounted to 85.5%.

Main axes of 2006 expenditure : the year was mainly characterised by the organisation of the fourth European Week of Regions and Cities (9-12 October 2006 with some 5 000 participants). On 6 May 2006, the CoR also contributed to organising EU Open Days and welcomed some 4 500 visitors. Moreover, the CoR Bureau organised five ordinary meetings and two extraordinary sessions in Innsbruck (Austria) and Turku (Finland).

In terms of financial management, 2006 also marked a turning point with the presentation, for the first time, of an activity report that takes account of the financial implementation of actions undertaken, in accordance with the Control Standards, as required by the Financial Regulation.

The other main axes of CoR expenditure can be summarised as follows:

Consultative work : the majority of the CoR’s work, as in the past, involved assisting the other institutions in their analysis of pending legislation. 2006 cannot, however, be considered a typical year, to the extent that the CoR’s Commissions only really worked for 8 of the 12 months, as a result of the CoR’s renewal. Two main units/commissions carry out this consultative work: UNIT 1 which focuses on the organisation and coordination of work with local authorities (22 opinions; 18 meetings; 3 working groups; 4 external conferences) and UNIT 2 which focuses on European governance, justice and home affairs, development cooperation and the EU’s external policy (19 opinions; 17 meetings; 6 external seminars; 7 meetings of working groups and local election observation missions). Lastly, UNIT 3 focuses on policy analysis, studies and inter-institutional legislative planning; Activity in addition to consultative work : in addition to consultative work, the CoR carries out communication work and acts as an intermediary with the press. In 2006, most of the CoR’s activities involved raising its profile and increasing its political impact, strengthening links with regional representatives, organising events (such as “Meeting Place on Europe’s Regions and Cities”), publishing documents for the general public, improving its intranet and external website, etc. In 2006, the most noteworthy actions, other than organising the EU Open Days on 6 May, include the organisation of public conferences and the opening of the headquarters to some 10 000 visitors (mostly officials and students).

Other notable points regarding the budgetary implementation of the CoR can be summarised as follows:

Title I (staff expenditure): EUR 44.285 million , 98.93% of which was committed and 91.56% paid. The Institution’s budget was on the whole respected, but large differences were noted in the implementation of certain areas of the budget, such as:

travel expenses : in 2006, the item for travel expenses required a transfer of appropriations to the amount of EUR 80 000, and almost all the appropriations made available for this item (including the transfer of appropriations) were used (98% of the amount available); the transfer of appropriations was necessary due to insufficient appropriations to meet needs and to take account of the different indexations of basic amounts (not indexed since 2004); entertainment and representation expenses : only 39% of expenses were actually paid (whereas 99% of appropriations provided for had been committed): these are mostly expenses of national delegations which recorded a (large) payment deficit; inter-institutional cooperation : in decline, with a payment rate of 28% (compared to commitments in the order of 98%). The most striking payment deficit was in the interpretation and translation services. With regard to interpretation, under-implementation is related to the reduction in the number of interpreters at meetings and the fact that distance interpretation was not used. As for translation, the costs decreased considerably compared to 2005 and were limited to EUR 71 000, of which 71.4% was used. In general, these amounts are used to tackle situations where there is an overload of work and they constitute a reserve capacity. Moreover, demand was very low for the first three quarters of the year following the renewal of the CoR and the limits on the size of documents to be translated. As this information was not known from the beginning, the rate of under-utilisation can be easily explained.

Title II (administrative expenditure): EUR 19.1 million , of which 95% was committed and 71% paid. This budgetary item was mostly characterised by a reduction in travel expenses and meeting expenses (particularly for candidate country observers – Bulgaria and Romania – and for speakers). The quite low rate of implementation can be explained by the fact that these observers and certain external speakers made use of low cost tickets. In this context, note that the CoR authorities have put several applications for refunds on hold due to a lack of supporting documentation (for travel costs, costs of studies or costs related to speakers’ meetings).

With regard to buildings policy, 2006 was mainly characterised by the purchase of furnishings to finalise the move to new buildings (Remorqueur and Van Maerlant). A large proportion of the furnishings was delivered in 2007 (but ordered in 2006).

Once again, note a net under-implementation of costs of hiring vehicles (official cars).

Transfer of appropriations : lastly, the document notes several transfers of appropriations between budget items or articles, including: (i) a transfer of appropriations to finance the CoR’s contribution to the funding of the Council crèche (which may also be used by children of CoR officials); (ii) a transfer to finance contractual agents; (iii) a transfer to finance the additional costs related to allowances for permanent or temporary staff; (iv) a transfer of appropriations (“mopping up”) in order to prepare in advance for the costs involved in fitting-out the Remorqueur building (EUR 1.2 million).

2007/03/27
   EP - LUNDGREN Nils (IND/DEM) appointed as rapporteur in CONT

Documents

Votes

Rapport Lundgren A6-0095/2008 - décision #

2008/04/22 Outcome: +: 623, -: 42, 0: 14
DE FR IT ES PL RO HU CZ NL PT BE EL BG SE LT DK IE FI AT SK LV SI EE CY LU MT GB
Total
88
65
54
52
51
27
22
22
23
21
22
23
15
15
12
13
12
12
17
11
9
7
6
5
5
4
66
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
255
2

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
185

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
89

Spain ALDE

1
2

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
36

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

France IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

France NI

Against (1)

4

Italy NI

2
2

Czechia NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

3

Bulgaria NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

2

Rapport Lundgren A6-0095/2008 - résolution #

2008/04/22 Outcome: +: 626, -: 46, 0: 15
DE FR IT ES PL RO CZ HU PT EL BE NL BG SE FI SK LT DK IE AT LV SI EE CY LU MT GB
Total
87
69
55
52
49
28
22
21
21
23
21
23
16
16
13
13
12
13
12
17
9
7
6
5
5
4
68
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
257
2

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
184

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
89

Spain ALDE

1
2

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
36

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
36

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
19

Poland IND/DEM

3

Greece IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
28

Italy NI

2
2

Czechia NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
AmendmentsDossier
6 2007/2043(DEC)
2008/03/07 CONT 6 amendments...
source: PE-402.770

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2007-11-15T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Court of Auditors: opinion, report
body
CofA
docs/0
date
2007-03-30T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/1
date
2007-11-15T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Court of Auditors: opinion, report
body
CofA
docs/1/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:273:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2007:273:TOC
docs/4
date
2008-05-28T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2008)3169
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/5
date
2008-05-28T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2008)3169
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/5/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14831&j=0&l=en
events/0/date
Old
2007-03-30T00:00:00
New
2007-03-29T00:00:00
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 100
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 94
docs/0
date
2007-11-15T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Court of Auditors: opinion, report
body
CofA
docs/0
date
2007-11-15T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Court of Auditors: opinion, report
body
CofA
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.411
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE400.411
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.770
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE402.770
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0095_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0095_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14831&j=0&l=en
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2008-04-01T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0095_EN.html title: A6-0095/2008
events/3
date
2008-04-01T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0095_EN.html title: A6-0095/2008
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080422&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080422&type=CRE
events/6
date
2008-04-22T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0139_EN.html title: T6-0139/2008
summary
events/6
date
2008-04-22T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0139_EN.html title: T6-0139/2008
summary
events/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-94-09B0_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-94-09B0_EN.html
procedure/final/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-94-09B0_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-94-09B0_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: LUNDGREN Nils date: 2007-03-27T00:00:00 group: Independence and democracy abbr: IND/DEM
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2007-03-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LUNDGREN Nils group: Independence and democracy abbr: IND/DEM
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:273:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2007:273:TOC
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-95&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0095_EN.html
docs/4/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-95&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0095_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-139
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0139_EN.html
events/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B[%g]-2009-194&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-94-09B0_EN.html
procedure/final/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B[%g]-2009-194&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-94-09B0_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2007-03-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=1055 type: Non-legislative basic document published title: SEC(2007)1055 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: KALLAS Siim type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2007-10-25T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2007-03-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2008-02-12T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2847
  • date: 2008-03-26T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2007-03-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-04-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-95&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0095/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-04-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14831&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080422&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-139 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0139/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-31T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B[%g]-2009-194&language=EN title: Budget 2009/194 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:088:TOC title: OJ L 088 31.03.2009, p. 0083
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: KALLAS Siim
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2007-03-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LUNDGREN Nils group: Independence and democracy abbr: IND/DEM
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2007-03-27T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/9
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/9
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/10
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/10
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
committees/11
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/11
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/12
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
committees/12
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
committees/13
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
opinion
False
committees/13
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/14
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
opinion
False
committees/14
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/15
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/15
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
opinion
False
committees/16
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/17
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
opinion
False
committees/17
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
committees/18
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
committees/18
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
committees/19
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
opinion
False
committees/19
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2847 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2847*&MEET_DATE=12/02/2008 date: 2008-02-12T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2007-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:273:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 273 15.11.2007, p. 0001 title: N6-0005/2008 summary: PURPOSE: to present the Court of Auditor’s report on the implementation of the 2006 budget (other institutions – Committee of the Regions - CoR). CONTENT: in its annual report for the financial year 2006, the Court evaluates the legality and regularity of operating expenditure of the institutions. While, on the whole, all the institutions put in place a satisfactory monitoring and control framework in 2006, the Court notes a certain number of weaknesses in terms of the procurement procedures of the institutions (particularly a lack of competition between tenderers in the case of negotiated procedures). In particular, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions largely disregarded the limited extent to which the negotiated procedure can be used according to the Financial Regulation. This can result in an increased risk for the legality and regularity of the expenditure. Audit of the EESC and the Committee of the Regions : the examination of a sample of negotiated procurement procedures and contracts managed by the ‘Joint Services’ of the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions revealed management and control weaknesses. In 2006 the expenditure relating to contracts resulting from a negotiated procedure, instead of a call for tenders, was a high percentage of the whole expenditure for procurement. For budget lines ‘insurance’, ‘water, gas, electricity and heating’, ‘cleaning and maintenance’ and ‘new purchases of technical equipment and installations’, this percentage exceeded 50 % of the total of the appropriations committed, which amounted to EUR 6.4 million. This practice does not comply with the general rule, set out in Article 89 of the Financial Regulation, that “all procurement contracts shall be put to tender on the broadest possible base”. The negotiated procedure is an exception applicable only within the strict limits set out in Articles 126, 127 and 129 of the Implementing Rules to the Financial Regulation (IR). Furthermore, in negotiated procedures the number of candidates invited to negotiate or to tender may not be less than three, provided that a sufficient number of candidates satisfy the selection criteria, and the number of candidates invited to tender must be sufficient to ensure genuine competition. For 70% of the contracts examined during the audit, a tender was requested from only one potential supplier. The Court considers that for most of these contracts (with a total value of EUR 1.8 million), it would have been possible to request tenders from more than one supplier. In addition, the Court notes that the proportion of negotiated procedures in relation to the number of contracts awarded by the authorising officer by delegation responsible for ‘investments in immovable property, rental of buildings and associated costs’ and ‘movable property and associated costs’ of the budget, had increased significantly in relation to earlier years. As far as March 2007, the authorising officer had not reported to the Institution setting out any measures taken to reverse that trend, as required by the Implementing Rules to the Financial Regulation. The Committee of the Regions is also involved in a series of anomalies concerning refunded travel costs of its members: according to the Committee’s rules, its Members may be refunded travel expenses for the cost of the flight tickets actually paid. Administrative costs incurred for the purchase of such tickets are reimbursed on presentation of the travel agency invoice. In various cases, travel expenditure was refunded on the basis of hand-written travel agency invoices always showing the same amount. In the context of an ex post verification procedure, the Committee’s administration found that this amount was on average 83 % higher than the price charged by the airline for the ticket used. There was no evidence of the actual administrative cost invoiced for the purchase. The Committee’s administration carried out a broad investigation into the matter, which was completed in July 2007. In the Court’s opinion the results of this investigation do not demonstrate that the amounts paid for administrative costs were justified. Replies of the Committee of the Regions : the Committee of the Regions has noted the comments of the Court in relation to contracts managed by the Joint Services with the EESC and is committed to improving financial management practices and methods in the Joint Services. In this regard, the Secretary General of the CoR has written to the Secretary General of the EESC proposing the implementation of a number of corrective measures, particularly in the area of financial circuits and tendering procedures. It is hoped that these measures can be implemented by agreement between the two Committees as soon as possible. Regarding the issue of refunded travel costs of its members, the Court notes that, in order to guarantee full transparency, the Committee has subjected further reimbursements to compliance with a number of conditions. It has also requested the members concerned to cease travelling under the previous arrangements (full flexibility of tickets, thus increasing the cost) and to ensure that their reimbursement claims reflect the actual price indicated on the flight ticket issued. type: Court of Auditors: opinion, report body: CofA
  • date: 2008-02-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.411 title: PE400.411 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-03-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.770 title: PE402.770 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-04-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-95&language=EN title: A6-0095/2008 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-05-28T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14831&j=0&l=en title: SP(2008)3169 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2007-03-30T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=1055 title: EUR-Lex title: SEC(2007)1055 summary: PURPOSE: to present the final annual accounts of the European Communities for the financial year 2006 – Other institutions: section VII – Committee of the Regions. CONTENT: this document sets out the amount of expenditure and the financial statement of the Committee of the Regions (CoR) for 2006 and presents an analysis of its financial management. The appropriations available for the CoR budget for the financial year 2006 amounted to EUR 63.363 million . Appropriations committed amounted to EUR 61.97 million – 97.8% of the budget – and appropriations paid amounted to 85.5%. Main axes of 2006 expenditure : the year was mainly characterised by the organisation of the fourth European Week of Regions and Cities (9-12 October 2006 with some 5 000 participants). On 6 May 2006, the CoR also contributed to organising EU Open Days and welcomed some 4 500 visitors. Moreover, the CoR Bureau organised five ordinary meetings and two extraordinary sessions in Innsbruck (Austria) and Turku (Finland). In terms of financial management, 2006 also marked a turning point with the presentation, for the first time, of an activity report that takes account of the financial implementation of actions undertaken, in accordance with the Control Standards, as required by the Financial Regulation. The other main axes of CoR expenditure can be summarised as follows: Consultative work : the majority of the CoR’s work, as in the past, involved assisting the other institutions in their analysis of pending legislation. 2006 cannot, however, be considered a typical year, to the extent that the CoR’s Commissions only really worked for 8 of the 12 months, as a result of the CoR’s renewal. Two main units/commissions carry out this consultative work: UNIT 1 which focuses on the organisation and coordination of work with local authorities (22 opinions; 18 meetings; 3 working groups; 4 external conferences) and UNIT 2 which focuses on European governance, justice and home affairs, development cooperation and the EU’s external policy (19 opinions; 17 meetings; 6 external seminars; 7 meetings of working groups and local election observation missions). Lastly, UNIT 3 focuses on policy analysis, studies and inter-institutional legislative planning; Activity in addition to consultative work : in addition to consultative work, the CoR carries out communication work and acts as an intermediary with the press. In 2006, most of the CoR’s activities involved raising its profile and increasing its political impact, strengthening links with regional representatives, organising events (such as “Meeting Place on Europe’s Regions and Cities”), publishing documents for the general public, improving its intranet and external website, etc. In 2006, the most noteworthy actions, other than organising the EU Open Days on 6 May, include the organisation of public conferences and the opening of the headquarters to some 10 000 visitors (mostly officials and students). Other notable points regarding the budgetary implementation of the CoR can be summarised as follows: Title I (staff expenditure): EUR 44.285 million , 98.93% of which was committed and 91.56% paid. The Institution’s budget was on the whole respected, but large differences were noted in the implementation of certain areas of the budget, such as: travel expenses : in 2006, the item for travel expenses required a transfer of appropriations to the amount of EUR 80 000, and almost all the appropriations made available for this item (including the transfer of appropriations) were used (98% of the amount available); the transfer of appropriations was necessary due to insufficient appropriations to meet needs and to take account of the different indexations of basic amounts (not indexed since 2004); entertainment and representation expenses : only 39% of expenses were actually paid (whereas 99% of appropriations provided for had been committed): these are mostly expenses of national delegations which recorded a (large) payment deficit; inter-institutional cooperation : in decline, with a payment rate of 28% (compared to commitments in the order of 98%). The most striking payment deficit was in the interpretation and translation services. With regard to interpretation, under-implementation is related to the reduction in the number of interpreters at meetings and the fact that distance interpretation was not used. As for translation, the costs decreased considerably compared to 2005 and were limited to EUR 71 000, of which 71.4% was used. In general, these amounts are used to tackle situations where there is an overload of work and they constitute a reserve capacity. Moreover, demand was very low for the first three quarters of the year following the renewal of the CoR and the limits on the size of documents to be translated. As this information was not known from the beginning, the rate of under-utilisation can be easily explained. Title II (administrative expenditure): EUR 19.1 million , of which 95% was committed and 71% paid. This budgetary item was mostly characterised by a reduction in travel expenses and meeting expenses (particularly for candidate country observers – Bulgaria and Romania – and for speakers). The quite low rate of implementation can be explained by the fact that these observers and certain external speakers made use of low cost tickets. In this context, note that the CoR authorities have put several applications for refunds on hold due to a lack of supporting documentation (for travel costs, costs of studies or costs related to speakers’ meetings). With regard to buildings policy, 2006 was mainly characterised by the purchase of furnishings to finalise the move to new buildings (Remorqueur and Van Maerlant). A large proportion of the furnishings was delivered in 2007 (but ordered in 2006). Once again, note a net under-implementation of costs of hiring vehicles (official cars). Transfer of appropriations : lastly, the document notes several transfers of appropriations between budget items or articles, including: (i) a transfer of appropriations to finance the CoR’s contribution to the funding of the Council crèche (which may also be used by children of CoR officials); (ii) a transfer to finance contractual agents; (iii) a transfer to finance the additional costs related to allowances for permanent or temporary staff; (iv) a transfer of appropriations (“mopping up”) in order to prepare in advance for the costs involved in fitting-out the Remorqueur building (EUR 1.2 million).
  • date: 2007-10-25T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-03-26T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Nils LUNDGREN (ID, SE) advising the Parliament to grant the Committee of the Regions' Secretary-General discharge in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2006. Firstly, the parliamentary committee notes that the Committee of the Regions (CoR) had the following appropriations available to assure its functions in 2006: EUR 74 391 953 in commitment appropriations (compared to EUR 69 570 456 in 2005) with a utilisation rate of 97.94%. Overall, MEPs welcome the signature, in December 2007, of a new Administrative Cooperation Agreement between the EESC and the CoR for the period 2008 to 2014, believing that cooperation between the two institutions will be financially advantageous for the European taxpayer. They note that the new Agreement keeps the most important areas (infrastructures, IT and telecommunications as well as translation, including the production of documents) within the Joint Services' remit, while a limited number of services are de-coupled (such as internal services, socio-medical service, the library and prepress). MEPs believe that this de-coupling should be budget neutral. They, therefore, urge the two Committees to carry out a joint analysis of this Cooperation Agreement and the decoupling of certain services as part of the mid-term review, in order to assess whether this shift of resources will have been beneficial to both. They also call on the two Committees to keep Parliament informed of the mini-cooperation agreements in the areas concerned by de-coupling. Procurement : like the Court of Auditors, MEPs note the management and control weaknesses in relation to public procurement and, notably, the high percentage of negotiated procedures, instead of calls for tenders, even though for the majority of building-related services (that were previously awarded after negotiated procedures) new contracts have been signed after calls for tender or call for tender procedures are on-going. In this context, MEPs welcome the creation, within the Joint Services, of a Contracts Unit providing assistance to all operational departments in the Joint Services in the area of public procurement. Building policy : MEPs note that, according to the Joint Services' answers to the rapporteur's questionnaire, with the occupation of the Remorqueur and Van Maerlant buildings in 2007, 92% of the Committees' total office space is now occupied and their needs for space have been satisfied for the coming years. Controls : MEPs note that the verification service was transferred in 2006 from the Budget and Finance unit to the General Administration unit of the CoR, with a view to further emphasising the principle of the separation of functions and the independence of that service. The CoR also requested all its services to verify 5% of all files in 2007. Therefore, on the whole, the CoR has significantly increased its resources and capacities in its financial verification service. MEPs welcome this progress as they consider it crucial that the controls carried out are rigorous. Members’ travel expenses : MEPs return to the issue of the amounts refunded to members for travel expenditure (air tickets) on the basis of hand-written travel agency invoices, which were on average 83% higher than the price actually charged by the airline for the ticket used. MEPs note that, following this, the CoR's administration carried out a broad investigation into the matter, which was completed in July 2007 and whose results did not demonstrate that the amounts paid for administrative costs were justified. At the same time, the CoR decided to make further reimbursements subject to compliance with a number of conditions and suspended all reimbursements based on travel documents purchased under the previous arrangements. The CoR also informed OLAF about the evolution of the dossier. Salary transfers : MEPs also consider the salary transfers made in 2006. Following an investigation, OLAF established that eight transfers were not in compliance with statutory conditions and recommended recovering the amounts overpaid from the officials concerned, as well as the opening of disciplinary proceedings for some of them. Subsequently, the files of five of them were submitted to the Belgian authorities and all the undue amounts were reimbursed. MEPs note that, following a request by the Belgian authorities, the CoR Appointing Authority lifted the immunity of the officials concerned to enable them to be interviewed by the authorities. At the same time, an administrative enquiry was launched by the CoR's Secretary-General and in two of the five cases the Appointing Authority will take its decision on the opening of disciplinary proceedings, as soon as it has received the necessary information as to the follow-up the Belgian authorities intend to give to those files. In a further case OLAF decided to address a warning to the official concerned. Regarding the overall dossier, MEPs reiterate their demand for a strict prosecution of all cases of fraudulent behaviour. They also welcome the fact that the weaknesses observed in terms of control (shortcomings in the separation of initiation services and internal verification of controls) resulted in a positive outcome within the CoR.
  • date: 2008-04-01T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-95&language=EN title: A6-0095/2008
  • date: 2008-04-22T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14831&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-04-22T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080422&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-04-22T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-139 title: T6-0139/2008 summary: The European Parliament adopted, by 623 votes in favour, 42 against and 14 abstentions, a Decision to grant the Committee of the Regions' Secretary-General discharge in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2006. The decision to grant discharge also constitutes closure of the accounts of this institution. At the same time, the Parliament adopted by 626 votes in favour, 46 against and 15 abstentions, a Resolution containing the comments which form part of the decision giving discharge. The report had been tabled for plenary by Nils LUNDGREN (ID, SE) on behalf of the Committee on Budgetary Control. The Resolution recalls that the Committee of the Regions (CoR) had the following appropriations available to assure its functions in 2006: EUR 74 391 953 in commitment appropriations (compared to EUR 69 570 456 in 2005) with a utilisation rate of 97.94%. Overall, the Parliament welcomes the signature, in 2007, of a new Administrative Cooperation Agreement between the EESC and the CoR for the period 2008 to 2014, believing that cooperation between the two institutions will be financially advantageous for the European taxpayer. It notes that the new Agreement keeps the most important areas (infrastructures, IT and telecommunications as well as translation, including the production of documents) within the Joint Services' remit, while a limited number of services are de-coupled (such as internal services, socio-medical service, the library and prepress) - this de-coupling should be budget neutral. It urges the two Committees to carry out a joint analysis of this Cooperation Agreement as part of the mid-term review, as well as the effect of the decoupling of certain services on the resources of these two institutions. The Parliament makes a series of observations which can be summarised as follows: Procurement : the Parliament notes the worryingly high percentage of negotiated procedures, instead of calls for tenders, for allocating certain services to this institution. Regretting this situation, the Parliament welcomes the creation, within the Joint Services, of a Contracts Unit providing assistance to all operational departments in the Joint Services in the area of public procurement; Controls : the Parliament notes that the CoR requested all its services to verify 5% of all files in 2007. Therefore, on the whole, the CoR has significantly increased its resources and capacities in its financial verification service., which is welcomed by the Parliament since it considers it crucial that the controls carried out are rigorous; Members’ travel expenses : the Parliament returns to the issue of the amounts refunded to members for travel expenditure (air tickets) on the basis of hand-written travel agency invoices, which were on average 83% higher than the price actually charged by the airline for the ticket used. The Parliament notes that, following this, the CoR's administration carried out a broad investigation into the matter, which was completed in July 2007 and whose results did not demonstrate that the amounts paid for administrative costs were justified. At the same time, the CoR decided to make further reimbursements subject to compliance with a number of conditions and suspended all reimbursements based on travel documents purchased under the previous arrangements. The CoR also informed OLAF about the evolution of the dossier; Salary transfers : the Parliament also considers the salary transfers made in 2006. Following an investigation, OLAF established that eight transfers were not in compliance with statutory conditions and recommended recovering the amounts overpaid from the officials concerned, as well as the opening of disciplinary proceedings for some of them. Subsequently, the files of five of them were submitted to the Belgian authorities and all the undue amounts were reimbursed. The Parliament notes that the CoR Appointing Authority lifted the immunity of the officials concerned. More generally, the Parliament considers that there should be strict prosecution of all cases of fraudulent behaviour.
  • date: 2008-04-22T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2009-03-31T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the CoR for the financial year 2006. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2009/194/EC of the European Parliament on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2006 (Section VII - Committee of the Regions). CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants the Secretary-General of the Committee of the Regions discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2006. This decision is in line with the European Parliament’s resolution adopted on 22 April 2008 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 22/04/2008). docs: title: Budget 2009/194 url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B[%g]-2009-194&language=EN title: OJ L 088 31.03.2009, p. 0083 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:088:TOC
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: KALLAS Siim
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/6/54015
New
  • CONT/6/54015
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 94
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 094
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.03.07 Previous discharges
New
8.70.03.07
Previous discharges
procedure/title
Old
2006 discharge: EC general budget, Committee of the Regions CoR
New
2006 discharge: EC general budget, Committee of the Regions
activities
  • date: 2007-03-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=1055 type: Non-legislative basic document published title: SEC(2007)1055 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget Commissioner: KALLAS Siim type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2007-10-25T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2007-03-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2008-02-12T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2847
  • date: 2008-03-26T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2007-03-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-04-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-95&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0095/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-04-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14831&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080422&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-139 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0139/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-31T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B[%g]-2009-194&language=EN title: Budget 2009/194 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:088:TOC title: OJ L 088 31.03.2009, p. 0083
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2007-03-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: KALLAS Siim
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/6/54015
reference
2007/2043(DEC)
title
2006 discharge: EC general budget, Committee of the Regions CoR
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 094
stage_reached
Procedure completed
type
DEC - Discharge procedure
final
subject
8.70.03.07 Previous discharges