Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Opinion | BUDG | ||
Lead | CONT | STUBB Alexander (PPE-DE) | |
Opinion | DEVE | WALTER Ralf (PSE) |
Legal Basis RoP 094
Activites
-
2009/03/31
Final act published in Official Journal
-
2008/04/22
Results of vote in Parliament
- Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament
-
T6-0161/2008
summary
The European Parliament adopted, by 599 votes in favour, 14 against and 36 abstentions, a Decision to grant the Commission discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth European Development Funds (EDFs) for the financial year 2006. The decision to grant discharge also constitutes closure of the accounts for the 4 EDFs currently being implemented.At the same time, the Parliament adopted, by 581 votes in favour, 15 against and 37 abstentions, a Resolution containing the comments which form part of the decision giving discharge. The report had been tabled for plenary by Christofer FJELLNER (EPP-ED, SE) (ex-Alexander STUBB report).The main observations made by the Parliament can be summarised as follows:Statement of Assurance: the Parliament welcomes the fact that the Court granted a positive statement of assurance to the Commission on the reliability of the EDF’s accounts and on the legality and regularity of underlying transactions. It regrets, however, that the Court noted a material incidence of error in transactions carried out by the Delegations of the Commission in third countries. Noting that a new standard contract for expenditure verifications by beneficiaries entered into force on 1 February 2006, the Parliament states that it intends to monitor the application of these procedures more closely in future.Modernisation of the accounting system: the Parliament notes that the Commission had to prepare the accounts of the EDFs by using accruals based accounting principles as of 2005, which was not done in 2005 or 2006. In fact, the implementation of this type of accounting implies a migration of the EDF-specific IT system (OLAS) to the Commission's central IT system (ABAC) and EuropeAid's local system (CRIS). This modification is not scheduled to be completed until the end of 2008. For this reason, the Parliament calls on the Commission to specify the measures it will take to clarify the discharge procedures for 2007 and 2008.Budgetise the EDF: an old request by the Parliament that has been pushed back several times: once again, the Parliament calls for the budgetisation of the EDF, a demand that has been repeatedly made. The Parliament believes that this budgetisation should be a priority objective in the multiannual financial framework following 2013. In the meantime, the Parliament insists on simplification of the management of the EDF, notably by closing previous EDFs as early as possible. In fact, with the start of the Tenth EDF in 2008, the Commission will continue to manage at least four EDFs simultaneously. It is therefore necessary to prioritise the closure of the Seventh, Eighth and Ninth EDFs (the Sixth was already closed).Enhancing Parliament's oversight as regards EDF funds managed by the European Investment Bank: recalling that Parliament has insufficient oversight with regard to the part of the EDF funds managed by the European Investment Bank (EIB) (EUR 2.037 billion for the Ninth EDF and EUR 1.1 billion for the Tenth), funds which are not covered by the discharge procedure, the Parliament speaks out against this oversight deficit and calls on the representatives of the EIB to present to the Committee on Budgetary Control an annual report on the funds in question.In terms of the RAL (outstanding commitments of around EUR 10.3 billion, which represents a quarter of funds committed), the Parliament urges the Commission to further reduce these funds, especially old and dormant commitments. While it welcomes the reduction in the level of RAL dating from pre-2001 EDF commitments by 49%, the Parliament requests that it receive regular updates on changes in this area. On the issue of budget support, the Parliament recalls that this shall only be granted to a beneficiary country where management is sufficiently transparent, accountable and effective. Understanding that the Commission takes its decisions in a difficult environment like the ACP countries, it notes the initiative taken by the Commission to interpret the eligibility criteria for budget support in a “dynamic” way. It calls for greater clarity regarding this interpretation where this scope for interpretation would increase risks. For the Parliament, budget support is and should only be granted to a beneficiary country where public expenditure is sufficiently transparent, as once the funds are granted, the Commission's and the Court of Auditor’s control powers are limited. In this context, the Parliament reiterates its view that the Commission should cooperate with the national audit institutions in the countries receiving budget aid.Furthermore, the Parliament welcomes the decision taken by the Commission that 20% of geographical funding under the Development Cooperation Instrument should be allocated to basic and secondary education and basic health, as long requested by the Parliament.In addition, the Parliament highlights that it is necessary to:increase the staff in delegations of the Commission in third countries; improve the monitoring of EuropeAid; improve the monitoring of Commission Technical Assistance projects and promote donor coordination in the area of technical assistance.
- 2008/04/02 Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
-
2008/03/26
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
- #2847
-
2008/02/12
Council Meeting
-
2007/10/11
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2007/07/23
Non-legislative basic document published
-
COM(2007)0458
summary
PURPOSE: to present the final accounts for the financial year 2006 of the 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th European Development Funds (EDF).CONTENT: this communication presents the final accounts of the 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th EDFs, which, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the 4 EDFs, must be presented to the European Parliament, Council and Court of Auditors.As was the case last year, these financial balance sheets apply the accounting principles used since 2005.The annual accounts for 2006 are presented as follows:1. part 1 - financial statements2. part 2 - the financial implementation of the EDFs3. part 3 - EIB projects.1) Financial statements: as in previous years, the report details the main principles for the presentation of the accounts. The accounting system of the European Development Funds comprises general accounts and financial accounts. Both sets of accounts are kept in Euro on the basis of the calendar year. The general accounts allow for the preparation of the financial statements as they show all charges and income for the financial year and are designed to establish the financial position in the form of a balance sheet at 31 December. The financial accounts give a detailed picture of the use of EDF resources. They are based on the cash accounting principle. In addition, the financial regulation sets out the accounting principles to be applied in drawing up the financial statements, as follows:– going concern basis;– prudence;– consistent accounting methods;– comparability of information;– materiality;– no netting;– reality over appearance, and – accrual-based accounting.In addition to presenting the balance sheets and financial accounts of the EDFs, the document details the internal workings of the EDF, notably in terms of the consolidation of funds.The 2006 consolidated balance sheet for the 4 EDFs at 31 December 2006 is as follows:· total assets: EUR 3 318.15 million (compared to EUR 3 122.1 million at 31 December 2005)· total liabilities: EUR 2 095.84 million (compared to EUR 1 485.75 million at 31 December 2005)· net assets: EUR 1 222.31 million (compared to EUR 1 636.35 million at 31 December 2005)· funds and reserves: same as net assets.Consolidated statement of changes in capital 2006 for the 4 EDFs:· fund capital: closing balance 2004: EUR 42 250.15 million (of which EUR 25 040 million called-up capital)· fund capital: closing balance 2005: EUR 42 877 million (of which EUR 27 390 million called-up capital)· fund capital: closing balance 2006: EUR 42 999.15 million (of which EUR 29 900 million called-up capital)The Fund Capital represents the total amount receivable from the Member States for the relevant EDF (in this case the cumulated 4 EDFs) as set out in the Cotonou Agreement.The statement of changes in capital for each of the EDFs is established as follows:· 6th EDF: closing balance 2006: EUR 7 560 million;· 7th EDF: closing balance 2006: EUR 10 940 million;· 8th EDF: closing balance 2006: EUR 12 840 million;· 9th EDF: closing balance 2006: EUR 11 659.15 million.Closure of 6th EDF: the document shows that, given the state of progress of the 6th EDF, the Authorising Officer decided to close this fund on 31st July 2006. In the absence of a legal basis for the closure of EDFs, the remaining balance was transferred to the 9th EDF which involved the transfer of the balances of ongoing projets, amounting to EUR 52.105 916 billion.2) Financial Implementation: concerning the statement of expenditure, the document focuses on 2 main types of financial implementation: one on previous EDFs (6th – 8th EDF) and the other on the 9th EDF. For the 9th EDF in particular, the report shows that the total sum was set at EUR 13.8 billion, including EUR 13.5 billion allocated to the ACP States in accordance with the first Financial Protocol included in the Cotonou Agreement, EUR 175 million allocated to the OCT (provided for by the EU Council Decision on the association of the OCT) and EUR 125 million reserved for the European Commission to cover expenses in connection with implementing the 9th EDF resources. The total sum of the first financial protocol, including the transferred balances of previous EDFs, covers the period 2000-2007. The long-term development budget for ACP States has two components:the A allocation for macroeconomic support, sectoral policies, and programmes and projects supporting Community aid, which corresponds to the allocation for the NIPs and structural adjustment in previous EDFs;the B allocation, intended to cover unforeseen needs such as emergency aid, contributions to debt reduction initiatives and support to offset adverse fluctuations in export earnings, generally corresponds to the Stabex, Sysmin and emergency aid allocations in previous EDFs.Of the total 9th EDF budget for the ACP States, EUR 1 billion was released in 2004 and 2005 after examination by the EU Council, on the basis of a proposal from the European Commission (see 2005 EDF discharge: DEC/2006/2169).The breakdown of 9th EDF allocations for ACP States, including the “conditional billion” and allocations managed directly by the European Investment Bank (EIB), is as follows:long-term development budget: EUR 9 812 millionregional budget: EUR 1 300 millioninvestment facility: EUR 163 million (managed by the EIB)Total: EUR 11 275.15 millionAs a guide, the document also presents a consolidated table of the financial implementation of the 4 EDFs at 31 December 2006 presented as follows:Consolidated accounts of the 4 EDFs at 31 December 2006 – financial implementation:6th EDF: 2006 closing balance: EUR 7 338.72 million (the remaining balance to be implemented was reported in the 9th EDF in July 2006 on the decision of the financial Authorising Officer: approximately EUR 52 million);7th EDF: 2006 closing balance: EUR 10 654.92 million;8th EDF: 2006 closing balance: EUR 11 050.29 million;9th EDF: 2006 closing balance: EUR 15 565.6 million.The consolidated sum implemented for all the EDFs is EUR 44.608 billion, of which EUR 41.445 billion were subject to a payment decision (93% of the total) and EUR 31.164 billion have, in fact, been paid (70% of the total amount).3) Communicated financial statements linked to EIB projects: the main instrument financed by the EIB is the Investment Facility established within the framework of the Cotonou Agreement. This Facility is managed by the European Investment Bank for a sum of EUR 2.2 billion for the ACPs and EUR 20 million for the OCTs. Within the framework of the Agreement, the EIB also manages loans granted from its own resources. All other financial resources and instruments under the Agreement are administered by the European Commission.The 2006 balance sheet of the Facility (ACP only) totals:Assets: EUR 709 977 000 (compared to EUR 515 339 000 at 31 December 2005)Liabilities: EUR 143 796 000 (compared to EUR 121 425 000 at 31 December 2005).
- DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/', 'title': 'Budget'}, KALLAS Siim
-
COM(2007)0458
summary
Documents
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2007)0458
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0106/2008
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T6-0161/2008
Amendments | Dossier |
2 |
2007/2064(DEC)
2008/02/28
DEVE
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the Commission's intention to reopen the debate on EDF budgetisation concurrently with the mid-term review of the 10th EDF; stresses that budgetisation would greatly favour democratic control and accountability of the EDF; stresses that integrating the EDF into the budget is also an appropriate way of addressing the recurrent problems linked to the slow and cumbersome nature of the intergovernmental ratification process;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Congratulates the Commission on reducing the level of reste à liquider (RAL) dating from pre-2001 EDF commitments by 49% in 2006; requests that it receive regular updates on changes in levels of normal and abnormal RAL; calls on the Commission to draw up, for the European Parliament and the ACP- EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly, a three-monthly statement on the disbursement of funds;
source: PE-402.695
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities/6/docs |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|