BETA


2007/2125(INI) Production of opium for medical purposes in Afghanistan

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET CAPPATO Marco (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion LIBE
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 134o-p3

Events

2007/11/21
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2007/10/25
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2007/10/25
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Marco CAPPATO (ALDE, IT) and made a recommendation to the Council on production of opium for medical purposes in Afghanistan. The resolution was adopted by 368 votes in favour to 49 against with 25 abstentions.

The report recalls that, according to the United Nations, Afghanistan produced 6 100 tonnes of opium in 2006, in other words, 50% more than in 2004. It also states that almost 40% of Afghanistan's GDP is opium-related, and that 3 million people are engaged in the poppy sector producing an income of 1 965 US dollars a year per family. The report goes on to say that, in 2007, the farm-gate value of the opium harvest totalled 1 billion US dollars, or 13% of the licit GDP of Afghanistan. The total potential value of the country's 2007 opium harvest accruing to farmers, laboratory owners and Afghan traffickers is expected to have reached 3.1 billion US dollars, which represents almost half the country's licit GDP of 7.5 billion US dollars, or 32% of the overall economy, including the opium sector.

Afghanistan has practically become the exclusive supplier of the world's deadliest drug, with 93% of the global opiates market. Parliament noted, however, that the number of opium-free provinces has more than doubled, from 6 in 2006 to 13 in 2007 due to successful schemes supporting alternative livelihoods and also expanded security in the north, as well as an effective awareness-raising programme including a system of rewards for good performers, and that 50% of the whole Afghan opium crop comes from the single province of Helmand.

Parliament stated that the growing opium economy and the danger of "state capture" by narco-interests pose a critical threat to development, state-building and security in Afghanistan. There are substantiated claims that insurgents, warlords, the Taliban and terrorist groups are obtaining the major part of their funding through trade in illicit narcotics.

The report went on to draw attention to the Senlis Council, an international security and development think tank, which presented a detailed Technical Dossier that describes how a village-based "Poppy for Medicine" project could work in Afghanistan, including an Integrated Social Control system, the production of Afghan medicines at village level, compulsory economic diversification and general rural development. According to a report by the International Narcotics Control Board there is a global oversupply of opiates for medical purposes. However, the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) has asked the international community to promote the prescription of painkillers, especially in poor countries, as severe under-treatment is reported in more than 150 countries where hardly anyone who is in need of treatment is being treated, and, in another 30 countries, where under-treatment is even more prevalent or where no data are available.

The European Union remains the biggest donor as regards efforts aimed at reducing the opium supply through projects that promote alternative livelihoods as a substitute for illicit crops. Parliament was convinced that the international presence needs to be complemented by an increased civil cooperation, in order to foster socio-political progress and economic development and also to win "the hearts and minds" of the local population. It felt that the extremely high costs and serious flaws in terms of effectiveness of a counter-narcotics strategy that does not take into account the regional, social and economic diversity of rural Afghanistan when developing and deploying measures on alternative livelihoods, and one that is based only on eradication. The fight against drug production in Afghanistan should reflect a differentiated approach by locality. Counter-narcotics efforts against farmers must be carefully limited to areas where licit livelihoods are possible (places where access to land and water resources is better, there is proximity to markets and land-person ratios are higher). Alternative livelihood programmes need to focus especially on poorer regions with limited resources, which are the most dependent on opium in the first place,

Accordingly, Parliament recommended that the Council:

(a) opposes, in the framework of integrated development programmes, recourse to fumigation as a means of eradicating the poppy in Afghanistan;

(b) elaborates and submits to the Afghan Government, within the framework of European sponsored illicit supply reduction programmes, a comprehensive plan and strategy aimed at controlling drug production in Afghanistan, by improving governance and tackling corruption at the highest levels of the Afghan administration (with a special focus on the Ministry of the Interior); targeting action against the key traffickers on the ground; improving comprehensive rural development, particularly in the poorest areas and in those not yet producing opium on a large scale; carefully and selectively engaging in manual eradication; and looking at the possibility of pilot projects for small-scale conversion of parts of the current illicit poppy cultivation into fields for the production of legal opium-based analgesics. Production should be subject to strict on-the-spot surveillance which should in its turn be complemented with monitoring by an international organisation, such as the UNDCP, which supervises that production and prevents any diversion of the product to other, illegal, markets such as the heroin market;

(c) offers its assistance in the implementation of a scientific "Poppy for Medicine" pilot project that will further investigate how licensing can contribute to the alleviation of poverty, diversification of the rural economy, general development and increased security, and how it can become a successful part of multilateral efforts for Afghanistan ensuring that a mechanism is in place to exclude regions where recent achievements in establishing the rule of law and the subsequent elimination or reduction of cultivation may easily be jeopardised.

Documents
2007/10/25
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2007/10/24
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2007/09/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2007/09/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2007/09/12
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Mr Marco CAPPATO (ALDE, IT) with a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on production of opium for medical purposes in Afghanistan.

The report recalls that, according to the United Nations, Afghanistan produced 6,100 tonnes of opium in 2006, in other words, 50% more than in 2004. It also states that almost 40% of Afghanistan's GDP is opium-related, and that 3 million people are engaged in the poppy sector producing an income of 1,965 US dollars a year per family.

The report goes on to say that, in 2007, the farm-gate value of the opium harvest totalled 1 billion US dollars, or 13% of the licit GDP of Afghanistan. The total potential value of the country's 2007 opium harvest accruing to farmers, laboratory owners and Afghan traffickers is expected to have reached 3.1 billion US dollars, which represents almost half the country's licit GDP of 7.5 billion US dollars, or 32% of the overall economy, including the opium sector,

The European Union remains the biggest donor as regards efforts aimed at reducing the opium supply through projects that promote alternative livelihoods as a substitute for illicit crops. In parallel, Afghanistan has also introduced strategies to combat drugs and to replace opium production. The Afghan Government has also established a Drug Regulation Committee, which comprises officials from the Ministries of Counter Narcotics, Health and Finance, in order to ‘regulate the licensing, sale, dispensation, import and export of all drugs for licit purposes in the country’.

In this regard, the report calls on the EU to do more to bring about a drastic reduction in opium production since Afghanistan has practically become the exclusive supplier of the world’s deadliest drug and that it has become the main source of income of local warlords, the Taliban and terrorist groups.

There is, however, a small glimmer of hope since the number of provinces that no longer cultivate opium has more than doubled (going from 6 in 2006 to 13 in 2007), and half of Afghanistan’s illicit opium cultivation in the province of Helmand. The report considers that the fight against drug production in Afghanistan should reflect a differentiated approach by locality and be targeted on poorer regions with limited resources, which are the most dependent on opium in the first place.

A further issue was raised by the Senlis Council (an international think tank dealing with security and development issues) in 2007 and presented in a detailed technical dossier describing how poppies can be produced for medical purposes. However, according to the International Narcotics Control Board, supply is currently greater than demand and there is a global surplus of opiates for medical purposes.

For this reason, the Committee recommends that the Council:

(a) opposes, in the framework of integrated development programmes, recourse to fumigation as a means of eradicating the poppy in Afghanistan;

(b) elaborates and submits to the Afghan Government, within the framework of European sponsored illicit supply reduction programmes, a comprehensive plan and strategy aimed at controlling drug production in Afghanistan, by improving governance and tackling corruption at the highest levels of the Afghan administration (with a special focus on the Ministry of the Interior); targeting action against the key traffickers on the ground; improving comprehensive rural development, particularly in the poorest areas and in those not yet producing opium on a large scale; carefully and selectively engaging in manual eradication; and looking at the possibility of pilot projects for small-scale conversion of parts of the current illicit poppy cultivation into fields for the production of legal opium-based analgesics;

(c) offers its assistance in the implementation of a scientific "Poppy for Medicine" pilot project that will further investigate how licensing can contribute to the alleviation of poverty, diversification of the rural economy, general development and increased security, and how it can become a successful part of multilateral efforts for Afghanistan.

2007/07/24
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2007/07/10
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2007/06/06
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2007/04/23
   EP - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: to propose a recommendation to the Council pursuant to Rule 114(1) of the Rules of Procedure by Graham WATSON , Marco PANNELLA , Marco CAPPATO and Annemie NEYTS - UYTTEBROECK on behalf of the ALDE Group on production of opium for medical purposes in Afghanistan.

CONTENT: according to the authors of the draft recommendation, the 2006 Report issued by the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) on 1 March 2007 states that, in Afghanistan, the total area being used for illicit opium poppy cultivation increased to a record 165 000 hectares, an increase of 59% over the figure for 2005, and more than twice the figure for 2003. In addition, the report entitled 'Afghanistan: Opium Survey 2006' compiled by the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) stresses that last year the quantity of opium harvested in that country reached a record level of about 6100 tons, an increase of nearly 50% over the figure for the previous year. Both the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund estimate that almost 40% of the Gross Domestic Product of Afghanistan is opium-related, and that some 2.9 million people (12.6% of the population) are engaged in the poppy sector. The figures show that it will clearly be impossible to achieve the goals set by the political declaration adopted by the 1998 United Nations General Assembly in New York concerning the total eradication or substantial reduction of illicit crops by 2008, denouncing the fact that insurgents, warlords, the Taliban and terrorist groups find their major source of funding in trafficking in illicit narcotics.

On this basis, the European Parliament urges the Council to adopt a common position - pursuant to Article 15 of the Treaty on European Union - concerning a comprehensive 'counter-narcotics' strategy in Afghanistan, which should provide for the production of poppies for medical purposes to be used, in the PE framework of an internationally managed pilot project, for the production of opium-based analgesics for the national Afghan market and possibly for those countries that experience a lack of availability of opiates.

Documents
2007/04/22
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to propose a recommendation to the Council pursuant to Rule 114(1) of the Rules of Procedure by Graham WATSON , Marco PANNELLA , Marco CAPPATO and Annemie NEYTS - UYTTEBROECK on behalf of the ALDE Group on production of opium for medical purposes in Afghanistan.

CONTENT: according to the authors of the draft recommendation, the 2006 Report issued by the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) on 1 March 2007 states that, in Afghanistan, the total area being used for illicit opium poppy cultivation increased to a record 165 000 hectares, an increase of 59% over the figure for 2005, and more than twice the figure for 2003. In addition, the report entitled 'Afghanistan: Opium Survey 2006' compiled by the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) stresses that last year the quantity of opium harvested in that country reached a record level of about 6100 tons, an increase of nearly 50% over the figure for the previous year. Both the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund estimate that almost 40% of the Gross Domestic Product of Afghanistan is opium-related, and that some 2.9 million people (12.6% of the population) are engaged in the poppy sector. The figures show that it will clearly be impossible to achieve the goals set by the political declaration adopted by the 1998 United Nations General Assembly in New York concerning the total eradication or substantial reduction of illicit crops by 2008, denouncing the fact that insurgents, warlords, the Taliban and terrorist groups find their major source of funding in trafficking in illicit narcotics.

On this basis, the European Parliament urges the Council to adopt a common position - pursuant to Article 15 of the Treaty on European Union - concerning a comprehensive 'counter-narcotics' strategy in Afghanistan, which should provide for the production of poppies for medical purposes to be used, in the PE framework of an internationally managed pilot project, for the production of opium-based analgesics for the national Afghan market and possibly for those countries that experience a lack of availability of opiates.

Documents
2007/04/17
   EP - CAPPATO Marco (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Cappato A6-0341/2007 - résolution #

2007/10/25 Outcome: +: 368, -: 49, 0: 25
DE FR ES PL IT HU GB RO BE CZ PT NL FI AT BG DK SK LU LV EE LT EL MT SI IE CY SE
Total
61
40
37
34
33
16
37
17
18
19
14
19
8
8
7
8
10
5
6
4
7
8
3
4
9
1
9
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
179

Netherlands PPE-DE

Against (1)

3

Finland PPE-DE

2

Bulgaria PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

Against (1)

3

Ireland PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

4

Sweden PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
114

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Estonia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Greece PSE

1

Malta PSE

1

Ireland PSE

1

Sweden PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Hungary ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
23

France Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
5

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

1

Slovakia NI

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
22

Germany GUE/NGL

4

France GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
11

Poland IND/DEM

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2
icon: ITS ITS
7

Italy ITS

Against (1)

1
3

Belgium ITS

Abstain (1)

3
icon: UEN UEN
22

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2

Ireland UEN

3

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2007-04-23T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0187_EN.html title: B6-0187/2007
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EP
events/0/date
Old
2007-04-23T00:00:00
New
2007-04-22T00:00:00
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE390.526
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE390.526
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE392.263
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE392.263
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0341_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0341_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14038&j=0&l=en
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0187_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0187_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2007-09-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0341_EN.html title: A6-0341/2007
events/3
date
2007-09-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0341_EN.html title: A6-0341/2007
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071024&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20071024&type=CRE
events/6
date
2007-10-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0485_EN.html title: T6-0485/2007
summary
events/6
date
2007-10-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0485_EN.html title: T6-0485/2007
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: CAPPATO Marco date: 2007-04-17T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2007-04-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CAPPATO Marco group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-341&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0341_EN.html
docs/3/body
EC
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-187&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0187_EN.html
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-341&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0341_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-485
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0485_EN.html
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 134o-p3
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 134-p3
activities
  • date: 2007-04-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-187&language=EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: B6-0187/2007 body: EC commission: DG: External Relations Commissioner: FERRERO-WALDNER Benita type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2007-06-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2007-04-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: CAPPATO Marco body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • date: 2007-09-12T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2007-04-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: CAPPATO Marco body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2007-09-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-341&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0341/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2007-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071024&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14038&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-485 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0485/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: External Relations commissioner: FERRERO-WALDNER Benita
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2007-04-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CAPPATO Marco group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2007-04-17T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: CAPPATO Marco
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
docs
  • date: 2007-07-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE390.526 title: PE390.526 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2007-07-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE392.263 title: PE392.263 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2007-09-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-341&language=EN title: A6-0341/2007 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-11-21T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14038&j=0&l=en title: SP(2007)6028 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2007-04-23T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-187&language=EN title: B6-0187/2007 summary: PURPOSE: to propose a recommendation to the Council pursuant to Rule 114(1) of the Rules of Procedure by Graham WATSON , Marco PANNELLA , Marco CAPPATO and Annemie NEYTS - UYTTEBROECK on behalf of the ALDE Group on production of opium for medical purposes in Afghanistan. CONTENT: according to the authors of the draft recommendation, the 2006 Report issued by the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) on 1 March 2007 states that, in Afghanistan, the total area being used for illicit opium poppy cultivation increased to a record 165 000 hectares, an increase of 59% over the figure for 2005, and more than twice the figure for 2003. In addition, the report entitled 'Afghanistan: Opium Survey 2006' compiled by the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) stresses that last year the quantity of opium harvested in that country reached a record level of about 6100 tons, an increase of nearly 50% over the figure for the previous year. Both the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund estimate that almost 40% of the Gross Domestic Product of Afghanistan is opium-related, and that some 2.9 million people (12.6% of the population) are engaged in the poppy sector. The figures show that it will clearly be impossible to achieve the goals set by the political declaration adopted by the 1998 United Nations General Assembly in New York concerning the total eradication or substantial reduction of illicit crops by 2008, denouncing the fact that insurgents, warlords, the Taliban and terrorist groups find their major source of funding in trafficking in illicit narcotics. On this basis, the European Parliament urges the Council to adopt a common position - pursuant to Article 15 of the Treaty on European Union - concerning a comprehensive 'counter-narcotics' strategy in Afghanistan, which should provide for the production of poppies for medical purposes to be used, in the PE framework of an internationally managed pilot project, for the production of opium-based analgesics for the national Afghan market and possibly for those countries that experience a lack of availability of opiates.
  • date: 2007-06-06T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-09-12T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report drafted by Mr Marco CAPPATO (ALDE, IT) with a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on production of opium for medical purposes in Afghanistan. The report recalls that, according to the United Nations, Afghanistan produced 6,100 tonnes of opium in 2006, in other words, 50% more than in 2004. It also states that almost 40% of Afghanistan's GDP is opium-related, and that 3 million people are engaged in the poppy sector producing an income of 1,965 US dollars a year per family. The report goes on to say that, in 2007, the farm-gate value of the opium harvest totalled 1 billion US dollars, or 13% of the licit GDP of Afghanistan. The total potential value of the country's 2007 opium harvest accruing to farmers, laboratory owners and Afghan traffickers is expected to have reached 3.1 billion US dollars, which represents almost half the country's licit GDP of 7.5 billion US dollars, or 32% of the overall economy, including the opium sector, The European Union remains the biggest donor as regards efforts aimed at reducing the opium supply through projects that promote alternative livelihoods as a substitute for illicit crops. In parallel, Afghanistan has also introduced strategies to combat drugs and to replace opium production. The Afghan Government has also established a Drug Regulation Committee, which comprises officials from the Ministries of Counter Narcotics, Health and Finance, in order to ‘regulate the licensing, sale, dispensation, import and export of all drugs for licit purposes in the country’. In this regard, the report calls on the EU to do more to bring about a drastic reduction in opium production since Afghanistan has practically become the exclusive supplier of the world’s deadliest drug and that it has become the main source of income of local warlords, the Taliban and terrorist groups. There is, however, a small glimmer of hope since the number of provinces that no longer cultivate opium has more than doubled (going from 6 in 2006 to 13 in 2007), and half of Afghanistan’s illicit opium cultivation in the province of Helmand. The report considers that the fight against drug production in Afghanistan should reflect a differentiated approach by locality and be targeted on poorer regions with limited resources, which are the most dependent on opium in the first place. A further issue was raised by the Senlis Council (an international think tank dealing with security and development issues) in 2007 and presented in a detailed technical dossier describing how poppies can be produced for medical purposes. However, according to the International Narcotics Control Board, supply is currently greater than demand and there is a global surplus of opiates for medical purposes. For this reason, the Committee recommends that the Council: (a) opposes, in the framework of integrated development programmes, recourse to fumigation as a means of eradicating the poppy in Afghanistan; (b) elaborates and submits to the Afghan Government, within the framework of European sponsored illicit supply reduction programmes, a comprehensive plan and strategy aimed at controlling drug production in Afghanistan, by improving governance and tackling corruption at the highest levels of the Afghan administration (with a special focus on the Ministry of the Interior); targeting action against the key traffickers on the ground; improving comprehensive rural development, particularly in the poorest areas and in those not yet producing opium on a large scale; carefully and selectively engaging in manual eradication; and looking at the possibility of pilot projects for small-scale conversion of parts of the current illicit poppy cultivation into fields for the production of legal opium-based analgesics; (c) offers its assistance in the implementation of a scientific "Poppy for Medicine" pilot project that will further investigate how licensing can contribute to the alleviation of poverty, diversification of the rural economy, general development and increased security, and how it can become a successful part of multilateral efforts for Afghanistan.
  • date: 2007-09-21T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-341&language=EN title: A6-0341/2007
  • date: 2007-10-24T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071024&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-10-25T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14038&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2007-10-25T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-485 title: T6-0485/2007 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Marco CAPPATO (ALDE, IT) and made a recommendation to the Council on production of opium for medical purposes in Afghanistan. The resolution was adopted by 368 votes in favour to 49 against with 25 abstentions. The report recalls that, according to the United Nations, Afghanistan produced 6 100 tonnes of opium in 2006, in other words, 50% more than in 2004. It also states that almost 40% of Afghanistan's GDP is opium-related, and that 3 million people are engaged in the poppy sector producing an income of 1 965 US dollars a year per family. The report goes on to say that, in 2007, the farm-gate value of the opium harvest totalled 1 billion US dollars, or 13% of the licit GDP of Afghanistan. The total potential value of the country's 2007 opium harvest accruing to farmers, laboratory owners and Afghan traffickers is expected to have reached 3.1 billion US dollars, which represents almost half the country's licit GDP of 7.5 billion US dollars, or 32% of the overall economy, including the opium sector. Afghanistan has practically become the exclusive supplier of the world's deadliest drug, with 93% of the global opiates market. Parliament noted, however, that the number of opium-free provinces has more than doubled, from 6 in 2006 to 13 in 2007 due to successful schemes supporting alternative livelihoods and also expanded security in the north, as well as an effective awareness-raising programme including a system of rewards for good performers, and that 50% of the whole Afghan opium crop comes from the single province of Helmand. Parliament stated that the growing opium economy and the danger of "state capture" by narco-interests pose a critical threat to development, state-building and security in Afghanistan. There are substantiated claims that insurgents, warlords, the Taliban and terrorist groups are obtaining the major part of their funding through trade in illicit narcotics. The report went on to draw attention to the Senlis Council, an international security and development think tank, which presented a detailed Technical Dossier that describes how a village-based "Poppy for Medicine" project could work in Afghanistan, including an Integrated Social Control system, the production of Afghan medicines at village level, compulsory economic diversification and general rural development. According to a report by the International Narcotics Control Board there is a global oversupply of opiates for medical purposes. However, the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) has asked the international community to promote the prescription of painkillers, especially in poor countries, as severe under-treatment is reported in more than 150 countries where hardly anyone who is in need of treatment is being treated, and, in another 30 countries, where under-treatment is even more prevalent or where no data are available. The European Union remains the biggest donor as regards efforts aimed at reducing the opium supply through projects that promote alternative livelihoods as a substitute for illicit crops. Parliament was convinced that the international presence needs to be complemented by an increased civil cooperation, in order to foster socio-political progress and economic development and also to win "the hearts and minds" of the local population. It felt that the extremely high costs and serious flaws in terms of effectiveness of a counter-narcotics strategy that does not take into account the regional, social and economic diversity of rural Afghanistan when developing and deploying measures on alternative livelihoods, and one that is based only on eradication. The fight against drug production in Afghanistan should reflect a differentiated approach by locality. Counter-narcotics efforts against farmers must be carefully limited to areas where licit livelihoods are possible (places where access to land and water resources is better, there is proximity to markets and land-person ratios are higher). Alternative livelihood programmes need to focus especially on poorer regions with limited resources, which are the most dependent on opium in the first place, Accordingly, Parliament recommended that the Council: (a) opposes, in the framework of integrated development programmes, recourse to fumigation as a means of eradicating the poppy in Afghanistan; (b) elaborates and submits to the Afghan Government, within the framework of European sponsored illicit supply reduction programmes, a comprehensive plan and strategy aimed at controlling drug production in Afghanistan, by improving governance and tackling corruption at the highest levels of the Afghan administration (with a special focus on the Ministry of the Interior); targeting action against the key traffickers on the ground; improving comprehensive rural development, particularly in the poorest areas and in those not yet producing opium on a large scale; carefully and selectively engaging in manual eradication; and looking at the possibility of pilot projects for small-scale conversion of parts of the current illicit poppy cultivation into fields for the production of legal opium-based analgesics. Production should be subject to strict on-the-spot surveillance which should in its turn be complemented with monitoring by an international organisation, such as the UNDCP, which supervises that production and prevents any diversion of the product to other, illegal, markets such as the heroin market; (c) offers its assistance in the implementation of a scientific "Poppy for Medicine" pilot project that will further investigate how licensing can contribute to the alleviation of poverty, diversification of the rural economy, general development and increased security, and how it can become a successful part of multilateral efforts for Afghanistan ensuring that a mechanism is in place to exclude regions where recent achievements in establishing the rule of law and the subsequent elimination or reduction of cultivation may easily be jeopardised.
  • date: 2007-10-25T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: External Relations commissioner: FERRERO-WALDNER Benita
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFET/6/49985
New
  • AFET/6/49985
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 134-p3
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 134-p3
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.20.01 Medicine, diseases
  • 6.40.04.06 Relations with Central Asian countries
  • 7.30.30.04 Action to combat drugs and drug-trafficking
New
4.20.01
Medicine, diseases
6.40.04.06
Relations with central Asian countries
7.30.30.04
Action to combat drugs and drug-trafficking
activities
  • date: 2007-04-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-187&language=EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: B6-0187/2007 body: EC commission: DG: External Relations Commissioner: FERRERO-WALDNER Benita type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2007-06-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2007-04-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: CAPPATO Marco body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • date: 2007-09-12T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2007-04-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: CAPPATO Marco body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2007-09-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-341&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0341/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2007-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071024&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14038&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-485 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0485/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2007-04-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: CAPPATO Marco
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
links
other
  • body: EC dg: External Relations commissioner: FERRERO-WALDNER Benita
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
AFET/6/49985
geographical_area
Afghanistan
reference
2007/2125(INI)
title
Production of opium for medical purposes in Afghanistan
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 134-p3
stage_reached
Procedure completed
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject