Events
The European Parliament adopted by 416 votes to 75, with 164 abstentions, a resolution on women and science.
The own initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Britta THOMSEN (PES, DK) on behalf of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality.
The Parliament recalls that research represents a crucial sector for the economic development of the European Union but that, in this domain, women are a minority, as female researchers comprise an average of 35% of researchers working in the public sector and an average of only 18% of researchers working in the private sector.
As a result of this observation, the Parliament calls on Member States to promote science as an interesting field for both sexes, from an early age, particularly amongst women. It considers that it is essential to fight against gender stereotypes, which are still present in the research sector. It encourages universities and faculties to analyse all forms of implicit gender discrimination and to resolve these issues.
To encourage a better integration of women in the research sector and in the field of science in general, a series of measures have been put forward.
These measures can be summarised as follows:
combating terrorism : a revision of the ‘good researcher’ model by identifying the differences between male and female scientific careers and by stressing that female researchers also contribute to the world of research; better work-life balance : measures are called for to offer them flexible working hours, improved child-care facilities, more favourable parental leave conditions,…; study grants : the establishment of a system for grants for doctoral studies which better respects the national maternity leave provisions (in effect, the age limits for the award of grants adversely affect young women who are mothers or who are looking after dependants; therefore, it is necessary to allow one year to be added to the deadline for applications for each year in which a dependant is looked after); recruitment of women to decision-making positions : a revision of recruitment procedures in order to increase the presence of women in senior posts in universities and education authorities (the Plenary criticises, in this respect, the unambitious and insufficient EU target of 25% of women in leading positions in public-sector research; gender equality should therefore imply a rate of at least 40% of women); furthermore, there are calls for more transparent recruitment processes and for an obligation to ensure gender balance in evaluation panels, selection and all other committees, as well as nominated panels and committees with a non-binding target of at least 40 % women (and at least 40 % men); awareness : it is necessary to raise awareness amongst the scientific community and policy makers of equal opportunities in science and research (top-level commitment is vital for achieving gender equality in research, and such a commitment must be expressed at national and institutional level); it is also important for universities, research institutes and private businesses to adopt and enforce equality strategies; Member States must also be encouraged to promote awareness-raising actions to inform and encourage girls to pursue scientific and technological university studies and degrees; participation of women in scientific research programmes : the Commission is called upon to ensure that attention is paid to the participation of women in scientific research programmes by providing targeted gender-awareness training for those in decision-making positions, those sitting on advisory boards and evaluation panels, those drafting invitations to tender as well as tenders, and those leading contract negotiations; the Commission is also called upon to ensure that in tenders submitted under FP7 there is a balanced representation of men and women and that gender action plans be developed at the proposal and evaluation stage of FP7; promotion of professional careers for women in scientific domains : it is also proposed to encourage female researchers and to further develop support and mentoring schemes, given that the development of support structures for career guidance and the provision of advice to female scientists would produce particularly positive results; it is also necessary to encourage greater participation of women in fields such as technology, physics, engineering, computer science and other domains; remuneration policy : it is vital that a fairer remuneration policy for female scientists be promoted and that research funds specifically targeted at women be provided to counter the under funding of women in research (the principle of equal pay should also apply to scholarships and grants); networking among female scientists : this should take place at national, regional and EU level; networks should be established to strengthen the position of women and to encourage them to participate in the policy debate.
The Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality adopted the own-initiative report by Britta THOMSEN (PES, DK) on women and science, recalling that research represents a crucial sector for the economic development of the European Union, and that Europe needs to recruit 700 000 additional researchers as part of the fulfilment of the Lisbon strategy for growth and employment. However, in this domain, women are a minority, as female researchers comprise an average of 35% of researchers working in the public sector and an average of only 18% of researchers working in the private sector. In addition, women are less present in the top grades of academia, as even though women make up more than 50% of EU students and achieve 43% of EU doctoral degrees, they hold, on average, only 15% of senior academic posts and thereby have considerably less influence with regard to decision-making positions in research.
Faced with this observation, MEPs call Member States to promote science as an interesting field for both sexes from an early age, particularly amongst women, and to fight against gender stereotypes, which are still present in the research sector . They encourage universities and faculties to analyse all forms of implicit gender discrimination and to resolve these issues. In particular, they highlight that the conventional approach to evaluating ‘excellence’ and ‘performance’, as regards the number of publications in the field of science, may not be gender neutral and that this approach restricts women.
To encourage a better integration of women in the research sector and in the field of science in general, a series of measures have been put forward by MEPs. These measures can be summarised as follows:
a revision of publications on the history of science and technology, in order to verify that women play a key role so that they are also seen as role models; a revision of the ‘good researcher’ model by identifying the differences between male and female scientific careers and by stressing that female researchers also contribute to the world of research; an improvement to the daily situation of female researchers who experience difficulties in balancing their schedule: some can no longer manage family life and professional life simultaneously; therefore, it is necessary to offer them flexible working hours, improved child-care facilities, as well as social security provision accessibility across borders; they should also be offered more favourable parental leave conditions (MEPs also note that by interrupting their scientific career for family reasons, women generally reduce their career opportunities – therefore, age must be taken into account together with the family situation – taking account of the number of the researcher's dependents); the establishment of a system for grants for doctoral studies which better respects the national maternity leave provisions (in effect, the age limits for the award of grants adversely affect young women who are mothers or who are looking after dependants; therefore, it is necessary to allow one year to be added to the deadline for applications for each year in which a dependant is looked after); a revision of recruitment procedures which tend to favour male researchers to the detriment of female researchers, and the implementation of strategies (in universities, research establishments and private businesses) to enforce gender equality in recruitment and decision-making – MEPs suggest, in particular, the application of an indicative and non-binding quota of at least 40% of women in recruitment in each of the scientific domains (public or private); raising awareness amongst the scientific community and policy makers of equal opportunities in science and research; increased participation of women in scientific research programmes (in this context, the Commission is called to monitor the participation of women in Community research programmes and to ensure a better representation of women in scientific groups which tender for the Seventh Framework Programme for research and technological development – notably, the Commission is called to better inform the Parliament of progress in the representation of women on assessment boards and selection committees of projects and to provide an interim assessment of the integration tools of the gender aspect in the Seventh Framework Programme); encouraging female researchers to follow support and mentoring schemes; the promotion of professional careers for women in scientific domains - in this context, MEPs suggest that measures such as obligatory targets for female researchers and professors are essential to achieving gender balance in science; a fairer remuneration policy for female scientists and a provision for research funds targeted at women to counter the under funding of women in research; the establishment (in universities) of special programmes increasing young girls' and women's interest in starting scientific careers and the implementation of programmes for coaching and supporting young women scientists in participating in research programmes and grant applications; the networking among female scientists at national, regional and EU level, in order to strengthen the position of women and to encourage them to participate in the policy debate.
Moreover, MEPs note that an excessively high proportion of female scientists abandon their career at some point along the ‘leaking pipeline’ model. It is for this reason that MEPs call for this phenomenon to be analysed on the basis of ‘push and pull factors’ and for the competent authorities to formulate possible solutions to improve the working environment for female scientists and to better take into account family responsibilities. Lastly, they call for measures that better support the mobility of women in order to guarantee them a more advantageous career progression.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4116
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3593/2
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0221/2008
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0165/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0165/2008
- Committee opinion: PE400.662
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE402.909
- Committee draft report: PE400.495
- Committee draft report: PE400.495
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE402.909
- Committee opinion: PE400.662
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0165/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3593/2
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4116
Activities
- Gérard ONESTA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Britta THOMSEN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Edit BAUER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Hiltrud BREYER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Danutė BUDREIKAITĖ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Gabriela CREȚU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Den DOVER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Avril DOYLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Zita GURMAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Małgorzata HANDZLIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Erna HENNICOT-SCHOEPGES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Monica Maria IACOB-RIDZI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Urszula KRUPA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Marusya LYUBCHEVA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Edward MCMILLAN-SCOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Marios MATSAKIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Siiri OVIIR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Marie PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Zita PLEŠTINSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Mihaela POPA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Eva-Britt SVENSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
- Ewa TOMASZEWSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Women and science (debate)
Votes
Rapport Thomsen A6-0165/2008 - par. 8/2 #
Rapport Thomsen A6-0165/2008 - par. 16/2 #
Rapport Thomsen A6-0165/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
82 |
2007/2206(INI)
2008/03/04
ITRE
22 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Points out that to comply with the Lisbon Strategy the EU needs 700 000 further researchers, and therefore calls on the Commission and the Member States to take specific measures, in accordance with the Roadmap for equality between women and men 2006-2010, to ensure that in 2010 the participation of women and men in science and technology are in balance;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Points out that age-limits for the award of grants adversely affect young people looking after dependants, and that these are for the most part women; therefore calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure, when such circumstances apply, that they include in their legislation measures to correct this anomaly, such as adding one year to the deadline for applications for each year in which a dependant is looked after;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Firmly believes that specific recruitment, training and public relations measures need to be introduced in order to promote and encourage greater participation on the part of women in fields such as technologies, physics, engineering, computer science and other domains which are still regrettably dominated by men;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls on the Commission to ensure that in submissions to calls for proposals under the Seventh FP a balanced presence of men and women is assessed positively; urges the Member States to make the same arrangements in their national and regional programmes;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to include the gender aspect in the Seventh FP’s interim assessments and progress reports;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Believes that it is of the utmost importance to promote science as an interesting field for both sexes from early on; urges that this be taken into account when planning educational material and in teacher training; encourages universities and faculties to analyse their entrance selection systems in order to identify possible implicit gender discrimination and correct the selection system accordingly;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to report to Parliament regularly on progress in the representation of women on assessment boards and selection committees, which under the Sixth framework programme for research and technological development are required to include a female membership of at least 40 %.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers, however, that more efforts are needed in order to increase women’s participation in top positions (on scientific boards and evaluation committees, for example) in all areas of science including research, recruitment, training, education, information technology, engineering, commerce, communications, public relations, advertising and industrial relations; and calls for measures, such as quotas, to ensure that the minimum participation of women and men is at least 40 per cent in these bodies;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Member States to analyse the factors behind the low proportion of women (15 % on average in the EU) in senior posts in the universities and education authorities, seriously reducing their influence over decision-making in research, when they have 43 % of the doctorates awarded in the EU.
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Acknowledges that women still earn 15 per cent less than men in Europe for the same work; calls on the Commission and the Member States to introduce effective policies to eliminate the gender pay gap; notes that in the field of science ‘equal pay’ should apply also to scholarships and stipends;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers, however, that more efforts are needed in order to increase women’s participation in top positions (on scientific boards and evaluation committees, for example) in all areas of science including research, recruitment, training, education, information technology, engineering, commerce, communications, public relations, advertising and industrial relations, by providing innovative forms of flexible working time for women that will allow them to continue working after becoming mothers;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Is of the opinion that more action is needed in order to overcome the under- representation of women, particularly in scientific academic circles;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Considers that networks of women scientists are an essential instrument for attracting a larger number of women to scientific and technological fields and promoting them in posts of responsibility; to this end, calls on the Commission and the Member States to set up networks at European, national and regional level and to support those that already exist, such as the European Platform of Women Scientists;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Considers that, in order to eliminate some of the barriers that women face in reaching senior positions in scientific careers, concrete measures need to be taken to promote a better understanding of the concepts of ‘good research’, ‘excellence’ and ‘innovation’, particularly as far as the criteria for the definition of a ‘good researcher’ are concerned, which should not be limited to the number of publications of the researchers;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to take appropriate measures to ensure that women’s contribution is not excluded in publications on the history of science and technology, not just because this is a clear case of discrimination, but also because the absence of ‘role models’ makes it hard to encourage the presence of a greater number of women in such fields;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the European Commission and on Member States to remove of all financial and administrative obstacles faced by women in the scientific field and to create more attractive and flexible working conditions for women, which will stimulate their interest in pursuing careers in all areas of science, by means of forms of support specifically for working mothers that will not affect the budget for scientific research;
source: PE-402.819
2008/03/10
FEMM
60 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 11 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 19 June 2007 on a regulatory framework for measures enabling young women in the European Union to combine family life with a period of studies∗,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Notes
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the percentage of women in the top grades of academia rarely exceeds 20% and men are three times more likely than women to obtain professorships or their equivalent,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the conventional approach to evaluating "excellence" and "performance" in terms of number of publications
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that the conventional approach to evaluating "excellence" and "performance", inter alia in terms of number of publications
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that the breaks women take in scientific careers for family reasons have a negative impact on their career opportunities, as most male colleagues do not take breaks and thus can achieve comparative positions at a younger age and gain an advantage in their further careers;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that the breaks women take in scientific careers for family reasons have a negative impact on their career opportunities, as most male colleagues do not take breaks and thus can achieve comparative positions at a younger age and gain an advantage in their further careers; asks therefore that age
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Regrets that the breaks women take in scientific careers for family reasons have a negative impact on their career opportunities, as most male colleagues do not take breaks and thus can achieve comparative positions at a younger age and gain an advantage in their further careers; asks therefore that age not be advanced as a criterion for excellence without the family situation's having been taken into consideration and calls for women, in particular mothers, to be able to benefit from scientific career development conditions that also allow them to take care of children;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Member States to analyse the factors discouraging women’s presence in senior posts in universities and education authorities, seriously reducing their influence over decision- making in research within the European Union, and to propose appropriate solutions.
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points out that age limits for the award of grants adversely affect young people looking after dependants, and that these are for the most part women; therefore calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that, in such circumstances, legislative measures are in place to correct this anomaly, such as adding one year to the deadline for applications for each year in which a dependant is looked after;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that mobility is one of the crucial ways of developing and assuring research career advancement and notes that this can be difficult to reconcile with family life; points out, furthermore, that mobility problems affect women in particular, because, as a general rule, it is they who look after family members with specific needs, such as children, elderly people or other dependants;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that mobility is one of the crucial ways of developing and assuring research career advancement and notes that this can be difficult to reconcile with family life and that appropriate policy measures should therefore be taken to make it more viable;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Notes that mobility is one of the crucial ways of developing and assuring research
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses, in particular, that it is usually women who take care of their families, leading to instances whereby they are forced to leave the research sector;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Welcomes the activities carried out by
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Encourages universities, research institutes and private businesses to adopt and enforce equality strategies in their organisations and to conduct gender impact evaluation in their decision making processes,;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission and the Member States for more transparent recruitment processes and for an obligation to ensure gender balance in evaluation panels and selection committees
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission and the Member States for more transparent recruitment processes and for an obligation to ensure gender balance in evaluation panels and selection committees
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission and the Member States for more transparent recruitment processes and for an obligation to ensure gender balance in evaluation panels
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Criticises the unambitious and insufficient EU target of 25% of women in leading positions in public sector research;, reminds the Commission and the Member States that gender parity means at least 40% women;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Calls on the Commission to ensure that attention is given to the
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to improve the situation by means of integration of the family angle through possibilities for flexible working hours, improved child care facilities
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to improve the situation by means of integration of the family angle through possibilities for flexible working hours, improved child care facilities
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to improve the situation by means of integration of the family angle through possibilities for flexible working hours, improved child care facilities, cover of additional costs for moving abroad with a family as well as social security provisions accessibility across the borders;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States for a
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States for a change in the definition
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas one of the priority areas for EU action in the Roadmap for Gender Equality is equal representation in decision-making, including a target of 25 % of women in leading positions in public sector research, to be met by 2010,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission and the Member States for a change in the definitions of excellence and of a "good researcher", in order to take into account and overcome the differences between male and female scientific careers; stresses that female researchers also contribute to the research world with different perspectives and choices of research topics;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to provide appropriate social support to women, employed or engaged in the system of higher education and science, in order to enable them to balance their family and professional responsibilities and to ensure they have the opportunity to set "double priorities" - career and family;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission and the Member States for positive actions to be taken to encourage female researchers and for further development of support and mentoring schemes, as well as
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission and the Member States for positive actions to be taken to encourage female researchers and for further development of support and mentoring schemes, as well as targeted promotion policies with the goal of reaching gender parity; notes that simple measures like a sentence encouraging women in particular to apply has shown very positive results; however, also notes that measures such as obligatory targets for women researchers and professors are essential to achieve gender balance for women in science,
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15.
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Draws attention to the need of special programs at Universities increasing young girls' and women's interest in starting scientific careers;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to set up programmes of coaching and supporting young women scientists in participating in research programmes and grant applications in order to help them to stay in academia and research;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Regrets that nothing has come of the proposal to establish ‘Loyola de Palacio’ traineeships for women researchers at the European Parliament and calls on the High-Level Group on Gender Equality and Diversity to back the proposal and champion its approval before the relevant bodies;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 b (new) 19b. Considers that the approval and provision at the European Parliament of ‘Loyola de Palacio’ traineeships for women researchers would serve as a great example of best practice, political will and genuine commitment to promoting women’s involvement in science, and would lend greater visibility to Parliament's activities to promote equality;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. whereas highly gifted and talented girls are often not recognised as such, and therefore cannot realise their full potential in science and education; whereas the promotion of highly gifted girls is an important element in reaching the goal of 700,000 additional researchers as part of the Lisbon strategy,
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Draws
source: PE-402.909
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.662&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-400662_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14929&j=0&l=enNew
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14929&j=1&l=en |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.495New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE400.495 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.909New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE402.909 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.662&secondRef=03New
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.662&secondRef=03 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0165_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0165_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14929&j=1&l=en
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080520&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080520&type=CRE |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-165&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0165_EN.html |
docs/4/body |
EC
|
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-165&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0165_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-221New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0221_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
FEMM/6/53527New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/subject/0 |
Old
3.50 Research and technological development RTDNew
3.50 Research and technological development (RTD) |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|