BETA


2007/2256(INI) Implementing trade policy through efficient import and export rules and procedures

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead INTA AUDY Jean-Pierre (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2008/07/16
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/06/05
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2008/06/05
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 610 votes to 31, with 8 abstentions, a resolution on implementing trade policy through efficient import and export rules and procedures.

The own initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Jean-Pierre AUDY (EPP-ED, FR) on behalf of the Committee on International Trade.

The Parliament stresses the importance of effective import and export rules and procedures for the implementation of trade policy. However, it deplores the fact that the "customs feasibility" of certain trade policy initiatives is not always properly assessed and taken into account. It draws attention, for example, to the problems encountered in 2005 in implementing the Memorandum of Understanding with China of 10 June 2005 on the import of textile and clothing products.

MEPs stress the need for better cooperation between the Commission departments responsible for trade policy and those responsible for customs policy, in particular by including the latter more systematically in the teams which negotiate trade agreements. The Commission is called upon to pay particular attention to the problems encountered by SMEs, in particular by facilitating the process of adapting their IT systems to those employed by customs administrations.

Tariff classification, value, origin and economic arrangements : MEPs point out the particular importance of the rules concerning the tariff classification, value and origin – preferential and non-preferential – of goods. They encourage the Commission to strive continuously to improve these rules, both at Community level and in the multilateral contexts of the WTO and the WCO, making them more transparent, predictable, simple and effective. Moreover, they deplore the persistent deadlock in the multilateral harmonisation exercise concerning non-preferential rules of origin, which began as early as 1995 on the basis of the Agreement on Rules of Origin (ARO) concluded in the Uruguay Round. They consider that the Parliament should be more closely involved, so as to enable it to exercise the right of prior scrutiny it enjoys under the comitology procedure, in considering the draft regulation on the reform of the rules of origin of the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP), currently under consideration. The Commission is also called upon to consider simplifying the 'procedures with economic impact' and introducing more flexible procedures and a paperless system.

Trade facilitation : MEPs attach the utmost importance to the trade facilitation negotiations under way since August 2004 in the WTO. They consider that the issue of trade facilitation could be concluded and implemented separately, without disrupting the Round, and therefore call for it to be removed from the Single Undertaking. The report also supports the Commission's ambitious plans to include a chapter on facilitating trade and customs cooperation in all the new free trade agreements it negotiates.

New customs tasks : MEPs reiterate the need to establish at European Union level a plan to combat counterfeiting and piracy. They call on the Commission and the Member States to take all necessary measures to ensure that goods imported with a view to being placed on the European Union market comply with European consumer protection standards, particularly as regards health and safety.

A worrying erosion of freedom in the name of security : while acknowledging the legitimacy of concerns relating to the security of people and goods, the resolution stresses the need to strike a fair balance between control and facilitation, in order not to hamper international trade needlessly or excessively. In this context, MEPs urge the Transatlantic Legislators' Dialogue (TLD) and the Commission to continue their efforts to ensure that the US legislation requiring the scanning of all US-bound cargo is modified in line with a risk-based approach. They call on the Commission to raise the matter in the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) and other bodies and persuade the US to change its decision.

An ongoing lack of harmonisation : although the compatibility of the Union’s customs system with WTO rules was essentially confirmed, the resolution notes that EU trading partners and European economic operators themselves continue to call for greater harmonisation between national administrations in the implementation of Community customs legislation. MEPs criticise the reluctance of the Commission and the Member States to envisage, at this stage, new structures to ensure that Community customs legislation is applied in a uniform manner. They call on the Commission and the Member States to seriously consider the possibility of establishing a unified European Union customs service to enable customs rules and procedures to be implemented more effectively throughout the European Union's customs territory.

Documents
2008/06/05
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2008/06/04
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2008/05/14
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2008/05/14
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2008/05/06
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on International Trade adopted an own initiative report by Jean-Pierre AUDY (EPP-ED, FR) on implementing trade policy through efficient import and export rules and procedures.

The report stresses the importance of effective import and export rules and procedures for the implementation of trade policy. It recalls, however, that the effectiveness of any trade policy measure depends largely on the Union’s ability to ensure it is properly enforced.

MEPs stress the need for better cooperation between the Commission departments responsible for trade policy and those responsible for customs policy, in particular by including the latter more systematically in the teams which negotiate trade agreements. The Commission is called upon to pay particular attention to the problems encountered by SMEs, in particular by facilitating the process of adapting their IT systems to those employed by customs administrations, at the lowest possible cost, and by simplifying the procedures for securing 'authorised economic operator' status.

Tariff classification, value, origin and economic arrangements : MEPs point out the particular importance of the rules concerning the tariff classification, value and origin – preferential and non-preferential – of goods. They encourage the Commission to strive continuously to improve these rules, both at Community level and in the multilateral contexts of the WTO and the WCO, making them more transparent, predictable, simple and effective.

The report notes that it is important in general terms to ensure that the preferences granted to countries benefiting from preferential arrangements in certain sensitive sectors do not, by virtue of excessively flexible rules of origin, lend themselves too easily to being exploited by very competitive third countries. The Commission is also called upon to consider simplifying the 'procedures with economic impact', introducing more flexible procedures and a paperless system.

Trade facilitation : MEPs attach the utmost importance to the trade facilitation negotiations under way since August 2004 in the WTO. They consider that the issue of trade facilitation could be concluded and implemented separately, without disrupting the Round, and therefore call for it to be removed from the Single Undertaking. The report also supports the Commission's ambitious plans to include a chapter on facilitating trade and customs cooperation in all the new free trade agreements it negotiates.

New customs tasks : MEPs reiterate the need to establish at European Union level a plan to combat counterfeiting and piracy. They call on the Commission and the Member States to take all necessary measures to ensure that goods imported with a view to being placed on the European Union market comply with European consumer protection standards, particularly as regards health and safety, to prevent the circulation of products or substances which could be dangerous for consumers.

A worrying erosion of freedom in the name of security : while acknowledging the legitimacy of concerns relating to the security of people and goods, the report stresses the need to strike a fair balance between control and facilitation, in order not to hamper international trade needlessly or excessively.

In this context, MEPs urge the Transatlantic Legislators' Dialogue (TLD) and the Commission to continue their efforts to ensure that the US legislation requiring the scanning of all US-bound cargo is modified in line with a risk-based approach. They call on the Commission to raise the matter in the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) and other bodies and persuade the US to change its decision.

An ongoing lack of harmonisation : although the compatibility of the Union’s customs system with WTO rules was essentially confirmed, the report notes that both our trading partners and European economic operators themselves continue to call for greater harmonisation between national administrations in the implementation of Community customs legislation. In fact, pernicious discrepancies are sometimes found between Member States, for example with regard to the levying of VAT on imports, conditions for access to certain simplified procedures, the frequency of physical checks on goods and penalties.

MEPs criticise the reluctance of the Commission and the Member States to envisage, at this stage, new structures to ensure that Community customs legislation is applied in a uniform manner. They call on the Commission and the Member States to seriously consider the possibility of establishing a unified European Union customs service to enable customs rules and procedures to be implemented more effectively throughout the European Union's customs territory.

2008/04/07
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/03/07
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2007/11/29
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2007/10/08
   EP - AUDY Jean-Pierre (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA

Documents

Votes

Rapport Audy A6-0184/2008 - résolution #

2008/06/05 Outcome: +: 610, -: 31, 0: 8
DE FR IT GB ES PL NL RO HU EL BE BG SE PT AT FI CZ LT SK LV DK SI IE EE LU CY MT
Total
81
68
57
69
45
49
25
24
22
22
20
16
18
20
16
12
21
10
10
9
7
7
7
4
4
5
1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
246

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
178

Finland PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Denmark PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
83

Hungary ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
35

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
32

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
27

Italy NI

For (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Abstain (2)

7

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

3

Bulgaria NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
5

Poland IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
43 2007/2256(INI)
2008/04/07 INTA 43 amendments...
source: PE-404.677

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/3/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15016&j=0&l=en
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.892
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE402.892
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.677
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE404.677
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0184_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0184_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15016&j=0&l=en
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2008-05-14T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0184_EN.html title: A6-0184/2008
events/2
date
2008-05-14T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0184_EN.html title: A6-0184/2008
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080604&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080604&type=CRE
events/5
date
2008-06-05T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0247_EN.html title: T6-0247/2008
summary
events/5
date
2008-06-05T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0247_EN.html title: T6-0247/2008
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: AUDY Jean-Pierre date: 2007-10-08T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2007-10-08T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: AUDY Jean-Pierre group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-184&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0184_EN.html
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-184&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0184_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-247
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0247_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2007-11-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2007-10-08T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: AUDY Jean-Pierre
  • date: 2008-05-06T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2007-10-08T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: AUDY Jean-Pierre type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-05-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-184&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0184/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-06-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080604&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-06-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=15016&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-247 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0247/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Trade commissioner: MANDELSON Peter
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2007-10-08T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: AUDY Jean-Pierre group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
INTA
date
2007-10-08T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: AUDY Jean-Pierre
docs
  • date: 2008-03-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.892 title: PE402.892 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-04-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.677 title: PE404.677 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-05-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-184&language=EN title: A6-0184/2008 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-07-16T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=15016&j=0&l=en title: SP(2008)4439 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2007-11-29T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-05-06T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on International Trade adopted an own initiative report by Jean-Pierre AUDY (EPP-ED, FR) on implementing trade policy through efficient import and export rules and procedures. The report stresses the importance of effective import and export rules and procedures for the implementation of trade policy. It recalls, however, that the effectiveness of any trade policy measure depends largely on the Union’s ability to ensure it is properly enforced. MEPs stress the need for better cooperation between the Commission departments responsible for trade policy and those responsible for customs policy, in particular by including the latter more systematically in the teams which negotiate trade agreements. The Commission is called upon to pay particular attention to the problems encountered by SMEs, in particular by facilitating the process of adapting their IT systems to those employed by customs administrations, at the lowest possible cost, and by simplifying the procedures for securing 'authorised economic operator' status. Tariff classification, value, origin and economic arrangements : MEPs point out the particular importance of the rules concerning the tariff classification, value and origin – preferential and non-preferential – of goods. They encourage the Commission to strive continuously to improve these rules, both at Community level and in the multilateral contexts of the WTO and the WCO, making them more transparent, predictable, simple and effective. The report notes that it is important in general terms to ensure that the preferences granted to countries benefiting from preferential arrangements in certain sensitive sectors do not, by virtue of excessively flexible rules of origin, lend themselves too easily to being exploited by very competitive third countries. The Commission is also called upon to consider simplifying the 'procedures with economic impact', introducing more flexible procedures and a paperless system. Trade facilitation : MEPs attach the utmost importance to the trade facilitation negotiations under way since August 2004 in the WTO. They consider that the issue of trade facilitation could be concluded and implemented separately, without disrupting the Round, and therefore call for it to be removed from the Single Undertaking. The report also supports the Commission's ambitious plans to include a chapter on facilitating trade and customs cooperation in all the new free trade agreements it negotiates. New customs tasks : MEPs reiterate the need to establish at European Union level a plan to combat counterfeiting and piracy. They call on the Commission and the Member States to take all necessary measures to ensure that goods imported with a view to being placed on the European Union market comply with European consumer protection standards, particularly as regards health and safety, to prevent the circulation of products or substances which could be dangerous for consumers. A worrying erosion of freedom in the name of security : while acknowledging the legitimacy of concerns relating to the security of people and goods, the report stresses the need to strike a fair balance between control and facilitation, in order not to hamper international trade needlessly or excessively. In this context, MEPs urge the Transatlantic Legislators' Dialogue (TLD) and the Commission to continue their efforts to ensure that the US legislation requiring the scanning of all US-bound cargo is modified in line with a risk-based approach. They call on the Commission to raise the matter in the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) and other bodies and persuade the US to change its decision. An ongoing lack of harmonisation : although the compatibility of the Union’s customs system with WTO rules was essentially confirmed, the report notes that both our trading partners and European economic operators themselves continue to call for greater harmonisation between national administrations in the implementation of Community customs legislation. In fact, pernicious discrepancies are sometimes found between Member States, for example with regard to the levying of VAT on imports, conditions for access to certain simplified procedures, the frequency of physical checks on goods and penalties. MEPs criticise the reluctance of the Commission and the Member States to envisage, at this stage, new structures to ensure that Community customs legislation is applied in a uniform manner. They call on the Commission and the Member States to seriously consider the possibility of establishing a unified European Union customs service to enable customs rules and procedures to be implemented more effectively throughout the European Union's customs territory.
  • date: 2008-05-14T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-184&language=EN title: A6-0184/2008
  • date: 2008-06-04T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080604&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-06-05T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=15016&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-06-05T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-247 title: T6-0247/2008 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 610 votes to 31, with 8 abstentions, a resolution on implementing trade policy through efficient import and export rules and procedures. The own initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Jean-Pierre AUDY (EPP-ED, FR) on behalf of the Committee on International Trade. The Parliament stresses the importance of effective import and export rules and procedures for the implementation of trade policy. However, it deplores the fact that the "customs feasibility" of certain trade policy initiatives is not always properly assessed and taken into account. It draws attention, for example, to the problems encountered in 2005 in implementing the Memorandum of Understanding with China of 10 June 2005 on the import of textile and clothing products. MEPs stress the need for better cooperation between the Commission departments responsible for trade policy and those responsible for customs policy, in particular by including the latter more systematically in the teams which negotiate trade agreements. The Commission is called upon to pay particular attention to the problems encountered by SMEs, in particular by facilitating the process of adapting their IT systems to those employed by customs administrations. Tariff classification, value, origin and economic arrangements : MEPs point out the particular importance of the rules concerning the tariff classification, value and origin – preferential and non-preferential – of goods. They encourage the Commission to strive continuously to improve these rules, both at Community level and in the multilateral contexts of the WTO and the WCO, making them more transparent, predictable, simple and effective. Moreover, they deplore the persistent deadlock in the multilateral harmonisation exercise concerning non-preferential rules of origin, which began as early as 1995 on the basis of the Agreement on Rules of Origin (ARO) concluded in the Uruguay Round. They consider that the Parliament should be more closely involved, so as to enable it to exercise the right of prior scrutiny it enjoys under the comitology procedure, in considering the draft regulation on the reform of the rules of origin of the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP), currently under consideration. The Commission is also called upon to consider simplifying the 'procedures with economic impact' and introducing more flexible procedures and a paperless system. Trade facilitation : MEPs attach the utmost importance to the trade facilitation negotiations under way since August 2004 in the WTO. They consider that the issue of trade facilitation could be concluded and implemented separately, without disrupting the Round, and therefore call for it to be removed from the Single Undertaking. The report also supports the Commission's ambitious plans to include a chapter on facilitating trade and customs cooperation in all the new free trade agreements it negotiates. New customs tasks : MEPs reiterate the need to establish at European Union level a plan to combat counterfeiting and piracy. They call on the Commission and the Member States to take all necessary measures to ensure that goods imported with a view to being placed on the European Union market comply with European consumer protection standards, particularly as regards health and safety. A worrying erosion of freedom in the name of security : while acknowledging the legitimacy of concerns relating to the security of people and goods, the resolution stresses the need to strike a fair balance between control and facilitation, in order not to hamper international trade needlessly or excessively. In this context, MEPs urge the Transatlantic Legislators' Dialogue (TLD) and the Commission to continue their efforts to ensure that the US legislation requiring the scanning of all US-bound cargo is modified in line with a risk-based approach. They call on the Commission to raise the matter in the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) and other bodies and persuade the US to change its decision. An ongoing lack of harmonisation : although the compatibility of the Union’s customs system with WTO rules was essentially confirmed, the resolution notes that EU trading partners and European economic operators themselves continue to call for greater harmonisation between national administrations in the implementation of Community customs legislation. MEPs criticise the reluctance of the Commission and the Member States to envisage, at this stage, new structures to ensure that Community customs legislation is applied in a uniform manner. They call on the Commission and the Member States to seriously consider the possibility of establishing a unified European Union customs service to enable customs rules and procedures to be implemented more effectively throughout the European Union's customs territory.
  • date: 2008-06-05T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade commissioner: MANDELSON Peter
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
INTA/6/56507
New
  • INTA/6/56507
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 2.10.01 Customs union, tax and duty-free, Community transit
  • 6.20 Common commercial policy in general
  • 6.20.01 Agreements and relations in the context of the World Trade Organization (WTO)
  • 6.20.02 Export/import control, trade defence
New
2.10.01
Customs union, tax and duty-free, Community transit
6.20
Common commercial policy in general
6.20.01
Agreements and relations in the context of the World Trade Organization (WTO)
6.20.02
Export/import control, trade defence, trade barriers
procedure/subject/0
Old
2.10.01 Customs Union, tax and duty-free, Community transit
New
2.10.01 Customs union, tax and duty-free, Community transit
activities
  • date: 2007-11-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2007-10-08T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: AUDY Jean-Pierre
  • date: 2008-05-06T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2007-10-08T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: AUDY Jean-Pierre type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-05-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-184&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0184/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-06-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080604&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-06-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=15016&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-247 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0247/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2007-10-08T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: AUDY Jean-Pierre
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade commissioner: MANDELSON Peter
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
INTA/6/56507
reference
2007/2256(INI)
title
Implementing trade policy through efficient import and export rules and procedures
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject