BETA


2007/2268(INI) 2007 progress report on FYROM

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 089o, RoP P.F.

Events

2008/06/25
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/05/28
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/04/23
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted, by 601 votes to 52 and 30 abstentions, a resolution on the 2007 Progress Report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Erik MEIJER (GUE/NGL, NL) on behalf of the Foreign Affairs Committee.

Overall, Parliament commends the considerable progress achieved by this country since the last Progress Report, published by the Commission. In particular, MEPs welcome:

-the adoption of the Law on the Public Prosecutors, the Law on the Council of Prosecutors and the Law on the Committee for Inter-Community Relations listing the laws to be adopted by the double-majority rule (Badinter principle);

-the establishment of the National Council for European Integration, which aims to achieve cross-party support for EU accession-related reforms;

-the sustained efforts of the Macedonian Government and Parliament in the implementation of the Ohrid Framework Agreement (on political aspects of inter-ethnic relations in the country) and the increased recognition of the multi-ethnic character of the state;

-the progress achieved in 2007 with regard to the fight against corruption, organised crime, human trafficking and narcotics;

-the progress made in the economic area (particularly, in tax policy, enhanced fiscal discipline, improved business climate and the reduction of legal and administrative barriers to business start-ups).

Parliament is concerned, however, by the level of unemployment, which remains high, and urges the government to address this issue. It notes particularly the situation in the villages bordering Kosovo, where tackling unemployment is vital in order to give the local population opportunities to earn legal income. Members commend the work that is being carried out in the public administration in preparation for the EU accession negotiation process, and call on the authorities to continue the reform of the public administration in order to ensure its de-politicisation, professionalism, expertise and efficiency, and to refrain from any action that may jeopardise the administrative capacity already built up. It is a shared challenge for all political forces and ethnic communities within the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to demonstrate that the country is now free of conflicts viewed negatively both domestically and abroad, and to demonstrate that the country is ready for the process of integration into the EU. In this context, MEPs support the initiative of the Thessaloniki-based Centre for Democracy and Reconciliation in Southeast Europe and the Soros Foundation to publish textbooks on Balkan history, in both the Albanian and the Macedonian languages, intended for history teachers and secondary school students. These textbooks incorporate different views on the common past, provide a balanced perspective and promote reconciliation.

Electoral law: Parliament notes the draft Law on Revision of the Electoral Code, which would provide for the parliament to be enlarged by 13 seats in the interests of both representation of small ethnic minorities and representation of nationals living abroad. It expresses its concern at the fact that the proposed Law would have the effect of bypassing the use of the Badinter majority rule as intended by the Ohrid Framework Agreement. It is desirable that a broad consensus should be reached, with the participation of the Albanian representatives on any revision of the Electoral Code. Parliament hopes that all provisions of the Electoral Law, including Article 27 on the appointment of the President of the Electoral Committee, will be fully respected and that the ruling coalition will ensure fair and democratic early elections. Parliament takes note of the dissolution of parliament on 11 April 2008 and the calling of early elections in June 2008, and expresses the hope that the authorities will do their utmost to minimise any possible delay in the necessary preparations that should lead to the opening of accession talks before the end of 2008.

Fight against discrimination: Parliament draws attention to the continuing discrimination against the Roma community, particularly in the areas of education, social protection, health care, housing and employment. It hopes that the National Strategy for Roma will be implemented in accordance with its stated objectives in the near future. It also urges the authorities to ensure public compliance with EU and Council of Europe standards on countering the resurgence of "hate speech", particularly in the media, against neighbouring States.

Regional cooperation: Members welcome the active participation of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in the South East Europe Cooperation Process and its contribution to the establishment of the Regional Cooperation Council. They also welcome its constructive position on the status of Kosovo, whilst expressing concern over the delay in the technical demarcation of the border with Kosovo. This issue should proceed as envisaged in the proposal put forward by Mr Martti Ahtisaari, former UN Special Envoy for the Kosovo status process. Parliament welcomes the active cooperation with Kosovo in trade, customs and police cooperation matters and the fact that, at the same time, good-neighbourly relations are being maintained with Serbia and recommends a similar policy in relations with Albania, Bulgaria and Greece.

Name: MEPs welcome the increased bilateral cooperation, as well as people-to-people contacts between the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Greece. They note that bilateral talks have been held in the region, under the auspices of the United Nations and assisted by Special Envoy Matthew Nimitz, with a view to finding a mutually acceptable solution to the difference that has arisen over the name of the country. Parliament calls on both sides to seize the opportunity to resume negotiations immediately in the light of the significant progress made recently and to reach a compromise solution, so that the issue does not continue to represent an obstacle to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia's membership of international organisations, as provided for in the Interim Accord of 1995, which is still in force.

MEPs note that, although the country has achieved significant progress since 2005, it is the only country of the three candidate countries with which no accession negotiations have taken place to date. Parliament calls on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to ensure that the necessary reforms are undertaken. It refers to the list of eight benchmarks that the Commission has drawn up, derived from the key priorities of the new Accession Partnership, and hopes that the attainment of these by the country will lead to opening of the accession negotiations before the end of 2008. The Council is asked to evaluate at the next summit the progress made so far, and, if possible, to decide on a date for the start of the accession negotiations. Lastly, MEPs regret that the FYROM signed and ratified the Bilateral Immunity Agreement with the US authorities, granting citizens of that country exemption from the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court in The Hague. They call on the Macedonian Government to bring its national legislation into line with EU principles.

Documents
2008/04/23
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2008/04/10
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2008/04/09
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2008/03/04
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2008/03/04
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2008/02/27
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Erik MEIJER (GUE/NGL, NL) on the 2007 Progress Report on the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM), commending the considerable progress achieved by this country since the last Progress Report, published by the Commission. In particular, MEPs welcome:

· the adoption of the Law on the Public Prosecutors, the Law on the Council of Prosecutors and the Law on the Committee for Inter-Community Relations listing the laws to be adopted by the double-majority rule (Badinter principle);

· the establishment of the National Council for European Integration, which aims to achieve cross-party support for EU accession-related reforms;

· the sustained efforts of the Macedonian Government and Parliament in the implementation of the Ohrid Framework Agreement (on political aspects of inter-ethnic relations in the country) and the increased recognition of the multi-ethnic character of the state;

· the progress achieved in 2007 with regard to the fight against corruption, organised crime, human trafficking and narcotics;

· the progress made in the economic area (particularly, in tax policy, enhanced fiscal discipline, improved business climate and the reduction of legal and administrative barriers to business start-ups).

MEPs emphasise the political momentum that underlies the European integration of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, as well as the regular dialogue pursued between the Macedonian political parties in preparation for accession.

However, it is not enough to agree a rapid accession of this country into the EU and, for this reason, MEPs demand revitalised measures to tackle unemployment, particularly in the villages bordering Kosovo.

Concerning accession negotiations, MEPs welcome the measures already taken, yet they believe that the Macedonian authorities should continue the reform of the public administration in order to ensure its de-politicisation, professionalism, expertise and efficiency. For MEPs, all ethnic communities within the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia should demonstrate that this country is now free of conflicts (both domestic and international) and that the country is ready for the process of integration into the European Union. In this context, MEPs support the initiative of the Thessaloniki-based Centre for Democracy and Reconciliation in Southeast Europe and the Soros Foundation to publish textbooks on Balkan history, in both the Albanian and the Macedonian languages, intended for history teachers and secondary school students. These textbooks incorporate different views on the common past, provide a balanced perspective and promote reconciliation.

With regard to the draft Law on Revision of the Electoral Code, which would provide for the parliament to be enlarged by 13 seats in the interests of both representation of small ethnic minorities and representation of nationals living abroad, MEPs believe that the proposed Law would have the effect of bypassing the use of the Badinter majority rule as intended by the Ohrid Framework Agreement. Therefore, a broad consensus should be reached on any revision of the Electoral Code, before any amendment is made.

MEPs also demand measures with the aim of combating the ongoing discrimination against the Roma community.

In addition, MEPs request measures to increase the flexibility of the visa policy with the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and to facilitate the entry of Macedonian citizens on Member States’ territory.

MEPs also call for measures to promote women’s rights and freedom of the media. However, they refuse any measure that aims to fuel or revive “hate speeches” against neighbouring States.

On the environmental front, MEPs hope that real efforts will be made to protect water quality (especially River Vardar, which drains most of the country and continues as the Axios in Greece). Even though the adoption of the Law on Waste Management has led to some progress on handling asbestos, waste collection and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB), MEPs believe that the behaviour of the population towards the environment, on the whole, remains ambiguous.

As far as the issue of regional cooperation is concerned, MEPs welcome the active participation of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in the South East Europe Cooperation Process and its contribution to the establishment of the Regional Cooperation Council. They equally welcome its constructive position on the status of Kosovo, even though the technical demarcation of the border with Kosovo remains problematic. In this context, MEPs recall their inclination towards the proposal put forward by Mr Martti Ahtisaari, former UN Special Envoy for the Kosovo status process. Overall, MEPs commend the good-neighbourly relations between the FYROM, Kosovo and Serbia. They recommend a similar policy with Albania, Bulgaria and Greece.

MEPs welcome the increased bilateral cooperation between the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Greece, and the rapprochement of these two countries. They note that bilateral talks have been held in the region, under the auspices of the United Nations with a view to finding a mutually acceptable solution to the difference that has arisen over the name of the country and that both countries have accepted the UN Special Envoy's proposal of 19 February 2008 as a framework for further discussions. Consequently, MEPs call on both sides to step up their efforts to resolve this issue, which should in no circumstance become an obstacle to the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia's membership of international organisations.

At the same time, MEPs note that, although the country has achieved significant progress since 2005, it is the only country of the three candidate countries with which no accession negotiations have taken place to date. Therefore, it desirable that this exceptional situation should end and that the necessary reforms are undertaken. In this context, the Commission is called to develop a set of benchmarks which will lead the FYROM to the opening of the accession negotiations before the end of 2008.

Finally, MEPs regret that the FYROM signed and ratified the Bilateral Immunity Agreement with the US authorities, granting citizens of that country exemption from the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court in The Hague: for MEPs, such an act runs counter to EU standards and policies all aimed at supporting the International Criminal Court as well as the EU guiding principles concerning bilateral immunity agreements. They call on the Macedonian Government to bring its national legislation into line with EU principles.

2008/02/18
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council adopted a Decision on the principles, priorities and conditions contained in the EU's accession partnership with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – FYROM (see Council document 5351/08 ).

The Decision is based on Regulation No 533/2004 on the establishment of partnerships within the framework of the stabilisation and association process for the Western Balkans (see CNS/2003/0267 ). It updates the current partnership, identifying renewed priorities for further work on the basis of the findings of the Commission's 2007 progress report on FYROM's preparations for further integration with the EU.

The accession partnership is a key feature of the pre-accession strategy, identifying new as well as remaining priorities for action and providing guidance for financial assistance.

The Decision repeals Decision 2006/57/EC .

Documents
2008/02/18
   CSL - Council Meeting
2008/02/12
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2007/12/19
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2007/12/13
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2007/11/06
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Details

CONTENT: this report reviews the progress made by the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYRM) throughout 2007 in preparation for accession to the European Union. In particular, it details the efforts made by the country to comply with the Copenhagen criteria and supports the general strategy document on the enlargement policy of the EU (see COM(2007)0663 ) which reveals how the renewed consensus on accession, adopted by EU officials during the Summit in December 2006, will be implemented. The renewed consensus on enlargement is based on the principles of consolidation of commitments, fair and rigorous conditionality and better communication with the public, combined with the EU's capacity to integrate new members.

Although the country made a certain degree of progress in 2007, it will be in 2008 that most of this progress will be noticed. The main challenges to overcome will be improving governance and building a modern democracy by continuing to develop a political culture of tolerance and dialogue.

At the start of 2008, the Commission will evaluate the situation concerning the progress made and will provide guidelines for compliance with the programme set up by the EU for the Western Balkans.

The FYRM gained candidate country status in December 2005. No chapter has yet been opened for negotiation with this country.

Overall, progress made in the FYRM in 2007 as regards the three main criteria established in Copenhagen for accession to the EU is as follows:

1. Political criteria : the FYRM has made some progress in addressing the political criteria. The implementation of the Ohrid Framework Agreement continues to contribute to the consolidation of democracy and the rule of law. Some progress has been made in terms of the judicial system and the results obtained in the fight against corruption are encouraging. Overall, human rights and the protection of minorities, including inter-ethnic relations have improved. However, the pursuit of political tensions in the country is delaying the implementation of reforms. It is important for dialogue between all parties represented in the Parliament to be led in a peaceful and constructive manner. Efforts should be made to ensure that all political stakeholders assume the role given to them by the Commission and cooperate in order to ensure the effectiveness of the democratic process. Further progress could therefore be made in priority areas such as police and the justice system, consolidation of the rule of law as well as the protection of rights of minority communities. Furthermore, corruption remains widespread. The country continues to participate actively in regional cooperation and has leant its support to the South East European Cooperation Process (SEECP), to the Regional Cooperation Council and to the Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA);

2. Economic criteria : the FYRM has further moved towards establishing a functioning market economy. It should be able to cope with competitive pressures and market forces within the Union in the medium term, provided that it vigorously implements its comprehensive reform programme in order to reduce significant structural weaknesses. The country has maintained a broad consensus on the essentials of economic policies. An appropriate policy mix has contributed to macroeconomic stability. The country’s growth performance has been maintained while inflation has remained low. The current account was close to balance. Price and trade liberalisation are largely completed, and the privatisation of state property has continued. The process of property registration has been accelerated. Measures have been taken to improve the quality of education and training. However, unemployment remains particularly high. Institutional weaknesses still hamper the smooth functioning of the market economy. The judiciary continues to be a bottleneck and regulatory and supervisory agencies sometimes lack the necessary resources to fulfil their functions effectively. The degree of legal certainty is still low and labour markets are still functioning poorly;

3. EU legal order : the FYRM has made further efforts to improve its ability to assume the obligations of membership. There was some progress in the fulfilment of the short term priorities of the European partnership. The country still faces major shortcomings in implementing and effectively enforcing legislation. Adequate human and financial resources to fully implement the Stabilisation and Association Agreement are lacking. Large scale replacement of qualified staff following political changes hampered efforts to improve administrative capacity.

EU financial assistance through the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) : the FYRM should receive the following amounts over the period 2007-2011, in accordance with the IPA financial envelope:

2007: EUR 58.5 million 2008: EUR 70.2 million 2009: EUR 81.8 million 2010: EUR 92.3 million 2011: EUR 98.7 million Total: EUR 401.5 million.

Documents

Votes

Rapport Meijer A6-0059/2008 - am. 10 #

2008/04/23 Outcome: +: 579, -: 55, 0: 30
DE IT FR GB ES RO CZ PT BG NL EL BE SE HU AT SK LT FI SI PL DK EE LU CY MT IE LV
Total
85
58
69
66
45
29
22
20
18
19
22
20
15
17
17
14
12
13
7
48
10
6
5
4
3
11
9
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
260
2

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

2

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (1)

5

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

3
icon: PSE PSE
182

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Denmark PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
84

Spain ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
27

Italy NI

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3
2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
19

Netherlands IND/DEM

1

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
27

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3

Rapport Meijer A6-0059/2008 - am. 7 #

2008/04/23 Outcome: +: 595, 0: 40, -: 30
DE FR PL ES GB IT RO CZ NL PT BE HU EL BG AT FI SK SE LT DK SI EE IE CY LU MT LV
Total
85
70
49
45
67
56
30
21
21
20
20
16
22
18
17
12
14
15
11
10
7
6
11
5
5
3
9
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
256
2

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
182

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Denmark PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
84

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Spain Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
26

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

5

Italy NI

Against (1)

3

Belgium NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria NI

3

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3
icon: UEN UEN
34

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

Poland IND/DEM

For (1)

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

1

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Rapport Meijer A6-0059/2008 - am. 2 #

2008/04/23 Outcome: -: 576, +: 82, 0: 13
LU MT CY DK EE LV SI LT IE FI SE SK BG AT BE NL HU PT CZ RO EL PL ES IT GB DE FR
Total
5
3
5
11
6
9
7
12
11
13
16
14
17
17
19
20
16
21
21
30
22
48
45
57
68
87
71
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
19

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

Against (1)

3
icon: NI NI
27

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Italy NI

3

United Kingdom NI

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
85

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Belgium ALDE

3

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
176

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PSE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Estonia PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Slovakia PSE

3
4

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
258

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport Meijer A6-0059/2008 - am. 11 #

2008/04/23 Outcome: +: 378, -: 285, 0: 21
FR PL IT BG BE FI LT DK NL ES SE EE LV AT PT GB DE RO MT SI IE CY LU HU CZ SK EL
Total
72
49
57
18
21
13
10
11
22
47
16
6
9
17
21
68
90
30
4
7
11
5
5
17
22
14
22
icon: PSE PSE
183

Lithuania PSE

1

Denmark PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Malta PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
87

Spain ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

3
icon: UEN UEN
34

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3
icon: NI NI
28

Italy NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium NI

For (1)

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

5

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
19

Poland IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
262

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Rapport Meijer A6-0059/2008 - am. 13/rév. #

2008/04/23 Outcome: +: 605, -: 55, 0: 22
DE FR IT PL ES RO CZ EL PT GB BG NL BE SE HU LT SK IE FI AT DK SI EE CY MT LV LU
Total
90
72
59
47
47
30
22
21
20
68
18
21
20
16
17
12
14
11
13
17
11
7
6
5
4
9
5
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
262
2

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3
icon: PSE PSE
184

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Denmark PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
86

Spain ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Hungary ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: UEN UEN
33

Lithuania UEN

1

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
28

Czechia NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

5

Belgium NI

For (1)

3

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

3

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Romania Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Meijer A6-0059/2008 - am. 9 #

2008/04/23 Outcome: -: 606, 0: 43, +: 30
EL CY EE MT LU SI DK IE LV LT FI SK AT BG SE HU BE NL CZ PT RO PL IT ES FR GB DE
Total
20
3
4
4
5
7
11
11
9
12
13
14
17
18
16
17
21
22
22
21
30
49
59
47
71
68
88
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
19

Greece IND/DEM

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3
icon: NI NI
28

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Austria NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Bulgaria NI

3

Belgium NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1
2

Italy NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

5
icon: UEN UEN
34

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Greece GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
86

Cyprus ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
184

Estonia PSE

2

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Slovakia PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
262

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport Meijer A6-0059/2008 - am. 12 #

2008/04/23 Outcome: +: 624, -: 35, 0: 24
DE FR GB ES PL IT RO PT CZ BE NL HU SE EL BG FI AT LT SK IE DK SI EE CY LU MT LV
Total
88
72
68
46
49
57
30
21
22
21
22
17
16
22
18
13
17
12
14
11
11
7
6
5
5
4
9
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
259
2

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
184

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
88

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: UEN UEN
34

Lithuania UEN

1

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
28

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

5

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

3

Bulgaria NI

3

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
19

Poland IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Rapport Meijer A6-0059/2008 - résolution #

2008/04/23 Outcome: +: 601, -: 52, 0: 30
DE IT GB FR PL ES RO CZ PT HU SE EL NL BE BG LT FI SK IE AT LV SI DK EE CY MT LU
Total
88
59
68
72
47
47
30
22
21
17
16
22
22
21
17
12
13
14
11
17
9
7
11
6
5
4
5
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
262
2

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3
icon: PSE PSE
185

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

Against (1)

3

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Denmark PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
88

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
32

Lithuania UEN

1

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
19

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

3

Poland IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
27

Italy NI

For (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Czechia NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

3

Bulgaria NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

3

Austria NI

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3

Spain Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Romania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
184 2007/2268(INI)
2008/02/12 AFET 184 amendments...
source: PE-400.636

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/rapporteur
  • name: MEIJER Erik date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/4/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14744&j=0&l=en
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14744&j=0&l=en
New
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14744&j=1&l=en
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE398.675
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE398.675
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.636
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE400.636
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0059_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0059_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14744&j=1&l=en
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2008-03-04T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0059_EN.html title: A6-0059/2008
events/3
date
2008-03-04T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0059_EN.html title: A6-0059/2008
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080409&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080409&type=CRE
events/6
date
2008-04-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0172_EN.html title: T6-0172/2008
summary
events/6
date
2008-04-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0172_EN.html title: T6-0172/2008
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: MEIJER Erik date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2004-09-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MEIJER Erik group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1432/COM_SEC(2007)1432_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1432/COM_SEC(2007)1432_EN.pdf
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-59&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0059_EN.html
docs/4/body
EC
docs/5/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-59&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0059_EN.html
events/5/date
Old
2008-04-23T00:00:00
New
2008-04-10T00:00:00
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-172
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0172_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2007-12-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: MEIJER Erik
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2850 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2850*&MEET_DATE=18/02/2008 type: Debate in Council title: 2850 council: General Affairs date: 2008-02-18T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2008-02-27T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: MEIJER Erik type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-03-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-59&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0059/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-04-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080409&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-04-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14744&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-172 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0172/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations commissioner: REHN Olli
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2004-09-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MEIJER Erik group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2004-09-13T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: MEIJER Erik
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2850 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2850*&MEET_DATE=18/02/2008 date: 2008-02-18T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2007-11-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1432/COM_SEC(2007)1432_EN.pdf title: SEC(2007)1432 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=1432 title: EUR-Lex summary: CONTENT: this report reviews the progress made by the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYRM) throughout 2007 in preparation for accession to the European Union. In particular, it details the efforts made by the country to comply with the Copenhagen criteria and supports the general strategy document on the enlargement policy of the EU (see COM(2007)0663 ) which reveals how the renewed consensus on accession, adopted by EU officials during the Summit in December 2006, will be implemented. The renewed consensus on enlargement is based on the principles of consolidation of commitments, fair and rigorous conditionality and better communication with the public, combined with the EU's capacity to integrate new members. Although the country made a certain degree of progress in 2007, it will be in 2008 that most of this progress will be noticed. The main challenges to overcome will be improving governance and building a modern democracy by continuing to develop a political culture of tolerance and dialogue. At the start of 2008, the Commission will evaluate the situation concerning the progress made and will provide guidelines for compliance with the programme set up by the EU for the Western Balkans. The FYRM gained candidate country status in December 2005. No chapter has yet been opened for negotiation with this country. Overall, progress made in the FYRM in 2007 as regards the three main criteria established in Copenhagen for accession to the EU is as follows: 1. Political criteria : the FYRM has made some progress in addressing the political criteria. The implementation of the Ohrid Framework Agreement continues to contribute to the consolidation of democracy and the rule of law. Some progress has been made in terms of the judicial system and the results obtained in the fight against corruption are encouraging. Overall, human rights and the protection of minorities, including inter-ethnic relations have improved. However, the pursuit of political tensions in the country is delaying the implementation of reforms. It is important for dialogue between all parties represented in the Parliament to be led in a peaceful and constructive manner. Efforts should be made to ensure that all political stakeholders assume the role given to them by the Commission and cooperate in order to ensure the effectiveness of the democratic process. Further progress could therefore be made in priority areas such as police and the justice system, consolidation of the rule of law as well as the protection of rights of minority communities. Furthermore, corruption remains widespread. The country continues to participate actively in regional cooperation and has leant its support to the South East European Cooperation Process (SEECP), to the Regional Cooperation Council and to the Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA); 2. Economic criteria : the FYRM has further moved towards establishing a functioning market economy. It should be able to cope with competitive pressures and market forces within the Union in the medium term, provided that it vigorously implements its comprehensive reform programme in order to reduce significant structural weaknesses. The country has maintained a broad consensus on the essentials of economic policies. An appropriate policy mix has contributed to macroeconomic stability. The country’s growth performance has been maintained while inflation has remained low. The current account was close to balance. Price and trade liberalisation are largely completed, and the privatisation of state property has continued. The process of property registration has been accelerated. Measures have been taken to improve the quality of education and training. However, unemployment remains particularly high. Institutional weaknesses still hamper the smooth functioning of the market economy. The judiciary continues to be a bottleneck and regulatory and supervisory agencies sometimes lack the necessary resources to fulfil their functions effectively. The degree of legal certainty is still low and labour markets are still functioning poorly; 3. EU legal order : the FYRM has made further efforts to improve its ability to assume the obligations of membership. There was some progress in the fulfilment of the short term priorities of the European partnership. The country still faces major shortcomings in implementing and effectively enforcing legislation. Adequate human and financial resources to fully implement the Stabilisation and Association Agreement are lacking. Large scale replacement of qualified staff following political changes hampered efforts to improve administrative capacity. EU financial assistance through the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) : the FYRM should receive the following amounts over the period 2007-2011, in accordance with the IPA financial envelope: 2007: EUR 58.5 million 2008: EUR 70.2 million 2009: EUR 81.8 million 2010: EUR 92.3 million 2011: EUR 98.7 million Total: EUR 401.5 million. type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2007-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE398.675 title: PE398.675 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-02-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.636 title: PE400.636 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-03-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-59&language=EN title: A6-0059/2008 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-05-28T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14744&j=1&l=en title: SP(2008)3169 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14744&j=0&l=en title: SP(2008)3407 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2007-12-13T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-02-18T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2850*&MEET_DATE=18/02/2008 title: 2850 summary: The Council adopted a Decision on the principles, priorities and conditions contained in the EU's accession partnership with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – FYROM (see Council document 5351/08 ). The Decision is based on Regulation No 533/2004 on the establishment of partnerships within the framework of the stabilisation and association process for the Western Balkans (see CNS/2003/0267 ). It updates the current partnership, identifying renewed priorities for further work on the basis of the findings of the Commission's 2007 progress report on FYROM's preparations for further integration with the EU. The accession partnership is a key feature of the pre-accession strategy, identifying new as well as remaining priorities for action and providing guidance for financial assistance. The Decision repeals Decision 2006/57/EC .
  • date: 2008-02-27T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Erik MEIJER (GUE/NGL, NL) on the 2007 Progress Report on the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM), commending the considerable progress achieved by this country since the last Progress Report, published by the Commission. In particular, MEPs welcome: · the adoption of the Law on the Public Prosecutors, the Law on the Council of Prosecutors and the Law on the Committee for Inter-Community Relations listing the laws to be adopted by the double-majority rule (Badinter principle); · the establishment of the National Council for European Integration, which aims to achieve cross-party support for EU accession-related reforms; · the sustained efforts of the Macedonian Government and Parliament in the implementation of the Ohrid Framework Agreement (on political aspects of inter-ethnic relations in the country) and the increased recognition of the multi-ethnic character of the state; · the progress achieved in 2007 with regard to the fight against corruption, organised crime, human trafficking and narcotics; · the progress made in the economic area (particularly, in tax policy, enhanced fiscal discipline, improved business climate and the reduction of legal and administrative barriers to business start-ups). MEPs emphasise the political momentum that underlies the European integration of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, as well as the regular dialogue pursued between the Macedonian political parties in preparation for accession. However, it is not enough to agree a rapid accession of this country into the EU and, for this reason, MEPs demand revitalised measures to tackle unemployment, particularly in the villages bordering Kosovo. Concerning accession negotiations, MEPs welcome the measures already taken, yet they believe that the Macedonian authorities should continue the reform of the public administration in order to ensure its de-politicisation, professionalism, expertise and efficiency. For MEPs, all ethnic communities within the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia should demonstrate that this country is now free of conflicts (both domestic and international) and that the country is ready for the process of integration into the European Union. In this context, MEPs support the initiative of the Thessaloniki-based Centre for Democracy and Reconciliation in Southeast Europe and the Soros Foundation to publish textbooks on Balkan history, in both the Albanian and the Macedonian languages, intended for history teachers and secondary school students. These textbooks incorporate different views on the common past, provide a balanced perspective and promote reconciliation. With regard to the draft Law on Revision of the Electoral Code, which would provide for the parliament to be enlarged by 13 seats in the interests of both representation of small ethnic minorities and representation of nationals living abroad, MEPs believe that the proposed Law would have the effect of bypassing the use of the Badinter majority rule as intended by the Ohrid Framework Agreement. Therefore, a broad consensus should be reached on any revision of the Electoral Code, before any amendment is made. MEPs also demand measures with the aim of combating the ongoing discrimination against the Roma community. In addition, MEPs request measures to increase the flexibility of the visa policy with the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and to facilitate the entry of Macedonian citizens on Member States’ territory. MEPs also call for measures to promote women’s rights and freedom of the media. However, they refuse any measure that aims to fuel or revive “hate speeches” against neighbouring States. On the environmental front, MEPs hope that real efforts will be made to protect water quality (especially River Vardar, which drains most of the country and continues as the Axios in Greece). Even though the adoption of the Law on Waste Management has led to some progress on handling asbestos, waste collection and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB), MEPs believe that the behaviour of the population towards the environment, on the whole, remains ambiguous. As far as the issue of regional cooperation is concerned, MEPs welcome the active participation of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in the South East Europe Cooperation Process and its contribution to the establishment of the Regional Cooperation Council. They equally welcome its constructive position on the status of Kosovo, even though the technical demarcation of the border with Kosovo remains problematic. In this context, MEPs recall their inclination towards the proposal put forward by Mr Martti Ahtisaari, former UN Special Envoy for the Kosovo status process. Overall, MEPs commend the good-neighbourly relations between the FYROM, Kosovo and Serbia. They recommend a similar policy with Albania, Bulgaria and Greece. MEPs welcome the increased bilateral cooperation between the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Greece, and the rapprochement of these two countries. They note that bilateral talks have been held in the region, under the auspices of the United Nations with a view to finding a mutually acceptable solution to the difference that has arisen over the name of the country and that both countries have accepted the UN Special Envoy's proposal of 19 February 2008 as a framework for further discussions. Consequently, MEPs call on both sides to step up their efforts to resolve this issue, which should in no circumstance become an obstacle to the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia's membership of international organisations. At the same time, MEPs note that, although the country has achieved significant progress since 2005, it is the only country of the three candidate countries with which no accession negotiations have taken place to date. Therefore, it desirable that this exceptional situation should end and that the necessary reforms are undertaken. In this context, the Commission is called to develop a set of benchmarks which will lead the FYROM to the opening of the accession negotiations before the end of 2008. Finally, MEPs regret that the FYROM signed and ratified the Bilateral Immunity Agreement with the US authorities, granting citizens of that country exemption from the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court in The Hague: for MEPs, such an act runs counter to EU standards and policies all aimed at supporting the International Criminal Court as well as the EU guiding principles concerning bilateral immunity agreements. They call on the Macedonian Government to bring its national legislation into line with EU principles.
  • date: 2008-03-04T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-59&language=EN title: A6-0059/2008
  • date: 2008-04-09T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080409&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament summary:
  • date: 2008-04-23T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14744&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-04-23T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-172 title: T6-0172/2008 summary: The European Parliament adopted, by 601 votes to 52 and 30 abstentions, a resolution on the 2007 Progress Report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Erik MEIJER (GUE/NGL, NL) on behalf of the Foreign Affairs Committee. Overall, Parliament commends the considerable progress achieved by this country since the last Progress Report, published by the Commission. In particular, MEPs welcome: -the adoption of the Law on the Public Prosecutors, the Law on the Council of Prosecutors and the Law on the Committee for Inter-Community Relations listing the laws to be adopted by the double-majority rule (Badinter principle); -the establishment of the National Council for European Integration, which aims to achieve cross-party support for EU accession-related reforms; -the sustained efforts of the Macedonian Government and Parliament in the implementation of the Ohrid Framework Agreement (on political aspects of inter-ethnic relations in the country) and the increased recognition of the multi-ethnic character of the state; -the progress achieved in 2007 with regard to the fight against corruption, organised crime, human trafficking and narcotics; -the progress made in the economic area (particularly, in tax policy, enhanced fiscal discipline, improved business climate and the reduction of legal and administrative barriers to business start-ups). Parliament is concerned, however, by the level of unemployment, which remains high, and urges the government to address this issue. It notes particularly the situation in the villages bordering Kosovo, where tackling unemployment is vital in order to give the local population opportunities to earn legal income. Members commend the work that is being carried out in the public administration in preparation for the EU accession negotiation process, and call on the authorities to continue the reform of the public administration in order to ensure its de-politicisation, professionalism, expertise and efficiency, and to refrain from any action that may jeopardise the administrative capacity already built up. It is a shared challenge for all political forces and ethnic communities within the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to demonstrate that the country is now free of conflicts viewed negatively both domestically and abroad, and to demonstrate that the country is ready for the process of integration into the EU. In this context, MEPs support the initiative of the Thessaloniki-based Centre for Democracy and Reconciliation in Southeast Europe and the Soros Foundation to publish textbooks on Balkan history, in both the Albanian and the Macedonian languages, intended for history teachers and secondary school students. These textbooks incorporate different views on the common past, provide a balanced perspective and promote reconciliation. Electoral law: Parliament notes the draft Law on Revision of the Electoral Code, which would provide for the parliament to be enlarged by 13 seats in the interests of both representation of small ethnic minorities and representation of nationals living abroad. It expresses its concern at the fact that the proposed Law would have the effect of bypassing the use of the Badinter majority rule as intended by the Ohrid Framework Agreement. It is desirable that a broad consensus should be reached, with the participation of the Albanian representatives on any revision of the Electoral Code. Parliament hopes that all provisions of the Electoral Law, including Article 27 on the appointment of the President of the Electoral Committee, will be fully respected and that the ruling coalition will ensure fair and democratic early elections. Parliament takes note of the dissolution of parliament on 11 April 2008 and the calling of early elections in June 2008, and expresses the hope that the authorities will do their utmost to minimise any possible delay in the necessary preparations that should lead to the opening of accession talks before the end of 2008. Fight against discrimination: Parliament draws attention to the continuing discrimination against the Roma community, particularly in the areas of education, social protection, health care, housing and employment. It hopes that the National Strategy for Roma will be implemented in accordance with its stated objectives in the near future. It also urges the authorities to ensure public compliance with EU and Council of Europe standards on countering the resurgence of "hate speech", particularly in the media, against neighbouring States. Regional cooperation: Members welcome the active participation of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in the South East Europe Cooperation Process and its contribution to the establishment of the Regional Cooperation Council. They also welcome its constructive position on the status of Kosovo, whilst expressing concern over the delay in the technical demarcation of the border with Kosovo. This issue should proceed as envisaged in the proposal put forward by Mr Martti Ahtisaari, former UN Special Envoy for the Kosovo status process. Parliament welcomes the active cooperation with Kosovo in trade, customs and police cooperation matters and the fact that, at the same time, good-neighbourly relations are being maintained with Serbia and recommends a similar policy in relations with Albania, Bulgaria and Greece. Name: MEPs welcome the increased bilateral cooperation, as well as people-to-people contacts between the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Greece. They note that bilateral talks have been held in the region, under the auspices of the United Nations and assisted by Special Envoy Matthew Nimitz, with a view to finding a mutually acceptable solution to the difference that has arisen over the name of the country. Parliament calls on both sides to seize the opportunity to resume negotiations immediately in the light of the significant progress made recently and to reach a compromise solution, so that the issue does not continue to represent an obstacle to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia's membership of international organisations, as provided for in the Interim Accord of 1995, which is still in force. MEPs note that, although the country has achieved significant progress since 2005, it is the only country of the three candidate countries with which no accession negotiations have taken place to date. Parliament calls on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to ensure that the necessary reforms are undertaken. It refers to the list of eight benchmarks that the Commission has drawn up, derived from the key priorities of the new Accession Partnership, and hopes that the attainment of these by the country will lead to opening of the accession negotiations before the end of 2008. The Council is asked to evaluate at the next summit the progress made so far, and, if possible, to decide on a date for the start of the accession negotiations. Lastly, MEPs regret that the FYROM signed and ratified the Bilateral Immunity Agreement with the US authorities, granting citizens of that country exemption from the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court in The Hague. They call on the Macedonian Government to bring its national legislation into line with EU principles.
  • date: 2008-04-23T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement commissioner: REHN Olli
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFET/6/56656
New
  • AFET/6/56656
procedure/geographical_area/0
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
procedure/geographical_area/0
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM)
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 089o
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 089
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP P.F.
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP P.F
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.20.01 Candidate countries
New
8.20.01
Candidate countries
procedure/geographical_area/0
Old
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, FYROM
New
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM)
activities
  • date: 2007-12-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: MEIJER Erik
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2850 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2850*&MEET_DATE=18/02/2008 type: Debate in Council title: 2850 council: General Affairs date: 2008-02-18T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2008-02-27T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: MEIJER Erik type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-03-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-59&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0059/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-04-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080409&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-04-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14744&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-172 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0172/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2004-09-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: MEIJER Erik
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement commissioner: REHN Olli
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
AFET/6/56656
geographical_area
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, FYROM
reference
2007/2268(INI)
title
2007 progress report on FYROM
legal_basis
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Strategic initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
8.20.01 Candidate countries