Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | LIBE | BREJC Mihael ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | ||
Committee Opinion | AFET |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 062-p2-aa
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 062-p2-aaSubjects
Events
PURPOSE: to amend Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 as regards the use of the Visa Information System (VIS) under the Schengen Borders Code and to establish common rules applicable to the use of the VIS at the external borders.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EC) No 81/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 as regards the use of the Visa Information System (VIS) under the Schengen Borders Code.
CONTENT: Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) lays down the conditions, criteria and detailed rules governing checks at border crossing points and surveillance at the border, including checks in the Schengen Information System.
Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 concerning the Visa Information System (VIS) and the exchange of data between Member States on short-stay visas (VIS Regulation) aims at improving the implementation of the common visa policy. It also provides that the purposes of the VIS include facilitating both checks at external border crossing points and the fight against fraud.
Since only a verification of fingerprints can confirm with certainty that a person wishing to enter the Schengen area is the person to whom the visa has been issued, provision should be made for the use of the VIS at external borders.
That is the aim of this Regulation which amends, to that effect, Regulation (EC) No 562/2006.
The main amendments adopted by the Parliament and the Council following an agreement reached at first reading can be summarised as follows:
Principle of a systematic search in the VIS : Article 7(3) of Regulation No 562/2006 is amended so that any third country national entering the territory of a Member State shall be subject to thorough checks on entry, which shall comprise verification of the identity of the holder of the visa and of the authenticity of the visa, by consulting the Visa Information System (VIS) . To that end, border guards should use all necessary information available, including data which may be consulted in the VIS, in order to verify whether the entry conditions for third-country nationals are fulfilled. The use of the VIS should entail a systematic search in the VIS using the number of the visa sticker in combination with a verification of fingerprints .
Derogation : given the potential impact of such searches on waiting times at border crossing points, Parliament insisted that it should be possible, for a transitional period by way of derogation and in strictly defined circumstances, to consult the VIS without a systematic verification of fingerprints . Member States should ensure that this derogation is used only where the conditions are fully met and that the duration and frequency of application of this derogation is kept to a strict minimum at the individual border crossing points.
The conditions which must be satisfied are:
when traffic of such intensity arises that the waiting time at the border crossing point becomes excessive; all resources have already been exhausted in terms of staff, facilities and organisation; an assessment has been made that there is no risk related to internal security and illegal immigration.
In such cases, the VIS may be consulted using the number of the visa sticker in all cases and, on a random basis, the number of the visa sticker in combination with the verification of fingerprints. However, in all cases where there is doubt as to the identity of the holder of the visa and/or the authenticity of the visa, the VIS shall be consulted systematically using the number of the visa sticker in combination with the verification of fingerprints.
This derogation may only be applied provided that the aforementioned conditions have been satisfied.
Evaluation and implementation of the derogation : each Member State shall transmit once a year a report on the application of the derogation to the European Parliament and the Commission, which should include the number of third-country nationals who were checked in the VIS using the number of the visa sticker only and the length of the waiting time. The derogation will apply for a maximum period of three years , beginning three years after the VIS has started operations. The Commission shall, before the end of the second year, transmit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of their implementation. On the basis of that evaluation, the European Parliament or the Council may invite the Commission to propose appropriate amendments to the Regulation.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: this Regulation shall enter into force on 24/02/2009. The date for its application is linked to the date of entry into force of the VIS Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 767/2008).
The European Parliament adopted, by 567 votes to 75 and 49 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 as regards the use of the Visa Information System (VIS) under the Schengen Borders Code. The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Mihael BREJC (EPP-ED, SI) on behalf of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. The amendments were the result of a compromise between Parliament and Council.
These amendments, adopted under 1st reading of the codecision procedure, introduce a derogation to the general approach recommended by the proposal. Parliament stated that the use of the VIS should entail a systematic search in the VIS using the number of the visa sticker in combination with a verification of fingerprints. However, given the potential impact of such searches on waiting times at border crossing points, it should be possible, for a transitional period by way of derogation and in strictly defined circumstances, to consult the VIS without a systematic verification of fingerprints . Member States should ensure that this derogation is used only where the conditions are fully met and that the duration and frequency of application of this derogation is kept to a strict minimum at the individual border crossing points.
The conditions which must be satisfied are:
when traffic of such intensity arises that the waiting time at the border crossing point becomes excessive; and all resources have already been exhausted in terms of staff, facilities and organisation; and an assessment has been made that there is no risk related to internal security and illegal immigration.
In such cases, the VIS may be consulted using the number of the visa sticker in all cases and, on a random basis , the number of the visa sticker in combination with the verification of fingerprints. However, in all cases where there is doubt as to the identity of the holder of the visa and/or the authenticity of the visa, the VIS shall be consulted systematically using the number of the visa sticker in combination with the verification of fingerprints
Parliament further specified that the decision to consult the VIS shall be taken by the border guard in command at the border crossing point or at a higher level. The Member State concerned shall immediately notify the other Member States and the Commission of any such decision.
Each Member State shall transmit once a year a report on the application of the derogation to the European Parliament and the Commission, which should include the number of third-country nationals who were checked in the VIS using the number of the visa sticker only and the length of the waiting time.
The derogation will apply for a maximum period of three years, beginning three years after the VIS has started operations. The Commission shall, before the end of the second year, transmit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of their implementation. On the basis of that evaluation, the European Parliament or the Council may invite the Commission to propose appropriate amendments to the Regulation.
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report by Mihael BREJC (EPP-ED, SI) approving, subject to an amendment, the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 as regards the use of the Visa Information System (VIS) under the Schengen Borders Code.
The only amendment adopted by the committee, under the codecision procedure, introduces a derogation to the general approach recommended by the proposal. MEPs therefore recommend that the VIS should be consulted using the number of the visa sticker only or, on a random basis , the number of the visa sticker in combination with the verification of fingerprints.
A series of conditions must be satisfied in order for this derogation to apply:
when traffic of such intensity arises that the waiting time at the border crossing point becomes excessive; all resources have already been exhausted in terms of staff, facilities and organisation; an assessment has been made that there is no risk related to internal security and illegal immigration.
Where there is any doubt as to the identity of the holder of the visa and/or the authenticity of the visa, the VIS shall be consulted using the number of the visa sticker in combination with the verification of fingerprints.
The decision to consult the VIS shall be taken at least at the level of the border guard in command at the border crossing point.
MEPs request that each Member State transmit once a year a report on the application of this derogation. Three years after the date of application of this Regulation, the Commission shall transmit to the European Parliament and the Council a comprehensive evaluation of this derogation. On the basis of that evaluation, the European Parliament or the Council may invite the Commission to propose appropriate amendments to the Regulation.
PURPOSE: to develop an integrated border management of the EU’s borders through the adoption of common rules on the use of VIS.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: rules on the conditions, criteria and checks at border crossing points; surveillance at the border; and checks in the Schengen Information System (SIS) are set out in Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (See COD/2004/0127 ).
Complementing the Schengen Borders Code Regulation, is the proposed Visa Information System (VIS) Regulation that seeks to improve the implementation of a common visa policy. (See COD/2004/0287 ). Once adopted, the VIS Regulation will facilitate both checks at external border crossing points and the fight against fraud.
At the same time the Commission has tabled a proposal for a Regulation amending the Common Consular Instructions (CCI) on visas for diplomatic and consular posts relating to the introduction of biometrics, including provisions on the organisation and processing of visa applications. (See COD/2006/0088 ).
The VIS Regulation (Article 18) specifies that border guards will be allowed to search the VIS for verification purposes by using a number affixed to the visa sticker. This can be done in combination with the visa holder’s fingerprints. This search may be carried out using the visa sticker number only but for a maximum period of three years only following the start of operations.
However, given that a biometric check is the only reliable way to confirm, with certainty, that the person wishing to enter the Schengen area is the one to whom the visa has been issued, it is necessary that a systematic consultation of the VIS – that includes a biometric check and not just a number check – should be performed for each visa holder.
It should be noted that external border guards are not be obliged to use the VIS. Indeed, the VIS Regulation does not, and cannot, contain provision on the obligations to use the VIS at the external borders. One consequence of this could be that those border crossing points where the VIS is not systematically used will be exploited by illegal immigrants and criminals. Further, failure to use the VIS on a systematic basis could lead to considerable inefficiencies.
CONTENT: the purpose of this proposal, therefore, is to complement the VIS Regulation by establishing common rules on the use of the VIS at the EU’s external borders. It is to be done by amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006.
In short, the proposed provisions include:
rules on the use of the VIS for (i) entry checks; (ii) exit checks; and (iii) identification; compulsory consultation of the VIS for verification purposes at entry, in cases where the third country national holds a visa specified in the Schengen Borders Code (Article 5 (1) (b)); paragraphs determining the optional use of the VIS; verification during exit checks and for identification during entry and exit checks; and rules on the when consultations of the VIS should commence at external borders.
In accordance with specifications set out in the Schengen acquis the proposed Regulation will apply to Iceland, Norway and Switzerland. Denmark will not be participating in the adoption of the proposed Regulation; not will the United Kingdom and Ireland.
PURPOSE: to develop an integrated border management of the EU’s borders through the adoption of common rules on the use of VIS.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: rules on the conditions, criteria and checks at border crossing points; surveillance at the border; and checks in the Schengen Information System (SIS) are set out in Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (See COD/2004/0127 ).
Complementing the Schengen Borders Code Regulation, is the proposed Visa Information System (VIS) Regulation that seeks to improve the implementation of a common visa policy. (See COD/2004/0287 ). Once adopted, the VIS Regulation will facilitate both checks at external border crossing points and the fight against fraud.
At the same time the Commission has tabled a proposal for a Regulation amending the Common Consular Instructions (CCI) on visas for diplomatic and consular posts relating to the introduction of biometrics, including provisions on the organisation and processing of visa applications. (See COD/2006/0088 ).
The VIS Regulation (Article 18) specifies that border guards will be allowed to search the VIS for verification purposes by using a number affixed to the visa sticker. This can be done in combination with the visa holder’s fingerprints. This search may be carried out using the visa sticker number only but for a maximum period of three years only following the start of operations.
However, given that a biometric check is the only reliable way to confirm, with certainty, that the person wishing to enter the Schengen area is the one to whom the visa has been issued, it is necessary that a systematic consultation of the VIS – that includes a biometric check and not just a number check – should be performed for each visa holder.
It should be noted that external border guards are not be obliged to use the VIS. Indeed, the VIS Regulation does not, and cannot, contain provision on the obligations to use the VIS at the external borders. One consequence of this could be that those border crossing points where the VIS is not systematically used will be exploited by illegal immigrants and criminals. Further, failure to use the VIS on a systematic basis could lead to considerable inefficiencies.
CONTENT: the purpose of this proposal, therefore, is to complement the VIS Regulation by establishing common rules on the use of the VIS at the EU’s external borders. It is to be done by amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006.
In short, the proposed provisions include:
rules on the use of the VIS for (i) entry checks; (ii) exit checks; and (iii) identification; compulsory consultation of the VIS for verification purposes at entry, in cases where the third country national holds a visa specified in the Schengen Borders Code (Article 5 (1) (b)); paragraphs determining the optional use of the VIS; verification during exit checks and for identification during entry and exit checks; and rules on the when consultations of the VIS should commence at external borders.
In accordance with specifications set out in the Schengen acquis the proposed Regulation will apply to Iceland, Norway and Switzerland. Denmark will not be participating in the adoption of the proposed Regulation; not will the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2009/81
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 035 04.02.2009, p. 0056
- Draft final act: 03676/2008/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)6073
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T6-0383/2008
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0208/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A6-0208/2008
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE406.119
- Committee draft report: PE405.724
- Legislative proposal: COM(2008)0101
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2008)0101
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2008)0101 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE405.724
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE406.119
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0208/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)6073
- Draft final act: 03676/2008/LEX
Activities
- Jean-Pierre AUDY
Plenary Speeches (13)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ian HUDGHTON
Plenary Speeches (5)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Anna HEDH
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- David MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Hubert PIRKER
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jan ANDERSSON
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Koenraad DILLEN
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Göran FÄRM
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Hélène GOUDIN
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Carl LANG
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Fernand LE RACHINEL
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nils LUNDGREN
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Luca ROMAGNOLI
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Carl SCHLYTER
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Inger SEGELSTRÖM
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Frank VANHECKE
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Åsa WESTLUND
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Alessandro BATTILOCCHIO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mihael BREJC
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Philip CLAEYS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Glyn FORD
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bruno GOLLNISCH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Manuel dos SANTOS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Andrzej Jan SZEJNA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- MARIAN ZLOTEA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- John ATTARD-MONTALTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Slavi BINEV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jan BŘEZINA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nicodim BULZESC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Michael CASHMAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Konstantinos DROUTSAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Avril DOYLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Edite ESTRELA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Emanuel Jardim FERNANDES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ilda FIGUEIREDO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Urszula GACEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Patrick GAUBERT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Pedro GUERREIRO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Małgorzata HANDZLIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Gyula HEGYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marian HARKIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Christoph KONRAD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Jörg LEICHTFRIED
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Kartika Tamara LIOTARD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Baroness Sarah LUDFORD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Astrid LULLING
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Arlene McCARTHY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ramona Nicole MĂNESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Erik MEIJER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Sebastiano (Nello) MUSUMECI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Dumitru OPREA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Zdzisław Zbigniew PODKAŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Mihaela POPA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Nicolae Vlad POPA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- John PURVIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Eoin RYAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Daciana Octavia SÂRBU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Olle SCHMIDT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Kathy SINNOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Brian SIMPSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Søren Bo SØNDERGAARD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bart STAES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Ivo STREJČEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Margie SUDRE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- David SUMBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Georgios TOUSSAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
- Bernard WOJCIECHOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Explanations of vote
Votes
Rapport Brejc A6-0208/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
5 |
2008/0041(COD)
2008/05/15
LIBE
5 amendments...
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point a a (aa) if the third country national holds a visa referred to in Article 5(1)(b), the thorough checks on entry shall also comprise verification of the identity of the holder of the visa and of the authenticity of the visa, by consulting the Visa Information System (VIS)
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point a a (aa) if the third country national holds a visa referred to in Article 5(1)(b), the thorough checks on entry shall also comprise verification of the identity of the holder of the visa and of the authenticity of the visa
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point a a – subparagraph 1 a (new) By way of derogation, where traffic of such intensity arises that the waiting time at the border crossing point becomes excessive and all resources have been exhausted as regards staff, facilities and organisation, and where, on the basis of an assessment of the risk in terms of internal security and illegal immigration, it is established that the consultation of the VIS need not be systematic, such consultation may be carried out on a random basis for as long as such conditions are met. Consultation of the VIS shall in all cases be carried out in accordance with Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No xx/2008;
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point a a – subparagraph 1 a (new) In duly justified cases, when all resources have been exhausted as regards staff, facilities and organisation of border checks, and where traffic of such intensity arises that the waiting time at the border crossing point becomes excessive, the consultation of the VIS may, by way of derogation from Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No xx/2008, be carried out only with the number of the visa sticker, for certain categories of persons. A decision to that effect shall be taken by the border guard in command, on the basis of the principle of proportionality and of a risk analysis in terms of internal security and illegal immigration. The above-mentioned exemptions from the systematic checks of the VIS should be treated as temporary and tailored to particular circumstances;
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation – amending act Article 1 – point 1 Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point a a – subparagraph 1 a (new) However, on a non-systematic basis, when carrying out thorough checks on third- country nationals holding a visa, border guards may, acting in accordance with a decision by the border guard in command, decide to consult the VIS, using only the number of the visa sticker if there is no doubt as to the identity of the holder of the visa and/or the authenticity of the visa;
source: PE-406.119
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15141&j=0&l=en
|
events/0/date |
Old
2008-02-22T00:00:00New
2008-02-21T00:00:00 |
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2008&number=0041&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2008&number=0041&appLng=EN |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE405.724New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE405.724 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE406.119New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE406.119 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0208_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0208_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15141&j=0&l=en
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080901&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080901&type=CRE |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-208&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0208_EN.html |
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0101/COM_COM(2008)0101_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0101/COM_COM(2008)0101_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-208&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0208_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-383New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0383_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
LIBE/6/59960New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R0081New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R0081 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0101/COM_COM(2008)0101_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0101/COM_COM(2008)0101_EN.pdf |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|