Activites

• 2009/06/10 Final act published in Official Journal
  • Decision 2009/430
  • OJ L 147 10.06.2009, p. 0001
• #2908
• 2008/11/27 Council Meeting
• 2008/11/27 End of procedure in Parliament
• 2008/11/27 Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
• 2008/11/18 Results of vote in Parliament
  • Results of vote in Parliament
  • T6-0534/2008 summary

    The European Parliament adopted, by 646 votes to 17 with 7 abstentions, a legislative resolution, and gave its assent to the conclusion of the Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Hans-Peter MAYER (EPP-ED, DE), on behalf of the Legal Affairs Committee. 

• 2008/11/07 Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • A6-0428/2008
• 2008/11/04 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
• 2008/06/19 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
• #2783
• 2008/06/05 Council Meeting
• 2008/05/27 Legislative proposal published
  • 09196/2008 summary

    PURPOSE: to conclude a Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters.PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.BACKGROUND: in 1988 the Community signed an international agreement with the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway and the Swiss Confederation on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (the Lugano Convention). In signing this Agreement the Community extended to Iceland, Norway and Switzerland the 1968 Brussels Convention on the same matter (the Brussels Convention).Since then the Brussels Convention has been modified, modernised and the system of recognition and enforcement made more efficient through the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. (See CNS/1999/0154). However, given the parallelism and similarities between the Brussels and the Lugano Convention, the rules of the Lugano Convention should be aligned with those of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001.CONTENT: the purpose of this proposal is to align the Lugano Convention with that of the updated and modernised Brussels Convention (as set out in Regulation (EC) No 44/2001) in order to achieve the same level of circulation of judgements with the EFTA States concerned. In Annex to the proposed Decision, the Community declares that, when modifying Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, it intends to clarify the scope of Art. 22 (4) of that Regulation with a view to taking account of the relevant case-law of the European Court of Justice concerning proceedings on the registration or validity of intellectual property rights. This should ensure the principle of parallelism, whilst taking account of the Regulation’s evaluation. On a final point, in accordance with provisions set out in the EC Treaty, Denmark will not participate in the adoption of the proposed Regulation. Ireland and the United Kingdom will.

  • DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/justice/', 'title': 'Justice'}, BARROT Jacques
• 2008/02/29 Initial legislative proposal published
  • COM(2008)0116 summary

    PURPOSE: to conclude the Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, on behalf of the Community.PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.CONTENT: on 16 September 1988, the Member States signed an international agreement with the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, and the Swiss Confederation on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (the Lugano Convention),thereby extending to Iceland, Norway, and Switzerland the application of the rules of the Brussels Convention of 27 September 1968 on the same subject matter (the "Brussels Convention").Negotiations on a revision of the Brussels and Lugano Conventions were undertaken during the years 1998-1999 in the context of an ad hoc Working Party enlarged with Switzerland, Norway and Iceland. These negotiations led to the adoption of a text of a draft convention prepared by the Working Party, which was confirmed by the Council on 27 and 28 May 1999.Since the entry into force of the Amsterdam Treaty on 1 May 1999, the matters covered by the 1968 Brussels Convention have become the subject of Community policy, pursuant to Articles 61(c) and 65 of the EC Treaty. As a result thereof, the 1968 Brussels Convention has been converted into a Regulation, in particular Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters.In the light of the parallelism between the "Brussels" (EC) and the "Lugano" regimes on jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, the 1988 Lugano Convention needs to be adapted in order to reflect the evolution of the "Brussels" regime. In particular, it is important to align the system of recognition and enforcement of judgments in order to achieve the same level of circulation of judgments with the EFTA States concerned.By Decision of 27 September 2002, the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate a convention between the Community and, on the basis of the Protocol on its position, Denmark, of the one part, and Iceland, Norway, Poland, and Switzerland, of the other, on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters to replace the Lugano Convention.The Commission has negotiated such convention, on behalf of the Community, with the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation, and the Kingdom of Denmark. The Convention was signed, on behalf of the European Community, on 30 October 2007, subject to its possible conclusion at a later date, in accordance with Council Decision of 15 October 2007.In view of the positive outcome of the negotiations and the signature of the Convention, the Commission recommends that the Council adopt the decision concerning the conclusion of the Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters.The United Kingdom and Ireland are taking part in the adoption and application of this Decision. Pursuant to the Protocol on the position of Denmark, it does not take part in the adoption of the present Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.

  • DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/justice/', 'title': 'Justice'}, BARROT Jacques

Documents

• Initial legislative proposal published: COM(2008)0116
• Legislative proposal published: 09196/2008
• Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0428/2008
• Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
• Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T6-0534/2008
• : Decision 2009/430
• : OJ L 147 10.06.2009, p. 0001

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)