Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | LULLING Astrid ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | AGRI | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | DOS SANTOS Manuel ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
Committee Opinion | CONT | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | NEWTON DUNN Bill ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 093
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 093Events
The Commission presented a report on the implementation and evaluation of Council Directive 2008/118/EC concerning the general arrangements for excise duty. The Directive lays down the arrangements for the holding and movement of excise goods within the territory of the European Union.
In general, the Commission considered that arrangements for the holding and movement of excise goods should not distort competition , hinder the free movement of such goods within the EU, nor should such arrangements hinder tax collection or facilitate fiscal fraud.
In the light of the findings of the two studies commissioned by the Commission and an evaluation of this regulatory area under its better and effective Regulation (REFIT) programme, the Commission drew the following conclusions:
Suspension of excise duty : the Commission considered that the current arrangements for the holding and movement of excise goods under excise duty suspension work in an effective and efficient way , and in a way which could not be achieved without Union-wide action.
The report noted that the introduction of the Excise Movement and Control System (EMCS) for the supervision of movements of excise goods under duty suspension helps to improve the collection of excise duty.
As a result of the reduction in time required to process movement information EMCS has reduced the overall administrative costs for many Member States .
In 2014 alone, EMCS resulted in annual savings of between EUR 27.5 million and EUR 37 million.
Business to business duty paid movements : the Directive establishes the common rules for two types of intra-European Union commercial movements of excise goods on which duty has already been paid (i.e. released for consumption): consignments between traders (B2B) and the distance selling of excise goods to a private individual in another Member State (B2C). These arrangements are of particular interest to SMEs.
According to the report, 'duty paid' arrangements impose a substantial burden on businesses and are not compatible with the objective of encouraging the free movement of goods within the single market, due to the continued use of paper-based procedures, and variation in the approaches taken by Member State.
Average processing time varied between 4 and 8 hours depending on the nature of the consignment. This compares with a few minutes on average for the administration of an EMCS movement.
Accordingly, the Commission considered that the use of EMCS for duty paid procedures would streamline this type of trade, render rules more transparent and clear and would enable traders to recover easily and quickly the duty paid in the Member State of dispatch.
Issues to be resolved : the Commission suggested improvements that may be achieved by the planned amendment to Directive 2008/118/EC and its implementing regulations, in particular as regards the following points:
· coordination between customs and excise procedures : the large numbers of unclosed movements in the case of indirect export of excise goods continues to be a matter of concern. A clear legal base for transit and better harmonisation of the rules for the treatment of imported excise goods might also be useful.
· authorisations : requirements for authorisations to hold and move excise goods and for simplifications vary between Member States. These authorisations are subject to complex requirements which create excessive obstacles for traders;
· handling of shortages, excesses, other exceptions and the fight against fraud : EMCS is generally believed to have reduced fraud. The major problems identified by Member States were the entry of excessively long journey times by traders and a lack of certain data in the e-AD, such as the ownership of the goods at dispatch and destination, which could assist in risk analysis;
· duty paid procedures aimed at small and medium enterprises : these arrangements do not function well. They are a source of administrative burden and high trader compliance cost as well as a potential source of fraud. The arrangements for the distance selling of excise goods are even worse, with the generalised use of tax representatives making legitimate commercial business unviable.
Follow up : the Commission intends to examine the following issues:
· legal and technical improvements to the treatment of irregularities and the handling of claims by Member States;
· the usefulness of proposing a less burdensome regime than either EMCS or the SAAD system for the movement of excise goods of low fiscal risk, such as denatured alcohol, flavourings, perfumes and certain energy products;
· legal and technical changes to the arrangements used for the supervision of the import, export and transit of excise goods;
· the partial or full automation of the duty paid B2B arrangements with a view to reducing administrative burden and compliance costs on traders and Member States;
· the means to improve the arrangements for the cross-border distance selling of excise goods.
The Commission will take these conclusions into account in its preparations to revise Directive 2008/118/EC and will carry out an open public consultation and an Impact Assessment.
The Commission report aims to assess the functioning of horizontal rules in the excise area, in line with respective reporting obligations in the legislation, as regards two main aspects:
· the functioning of the arrangements for the computerised supervision of excise movements under duty suspension and
· the application of the administrative cooperation rules in the area of excise duties.
It is thus a first ‘building-block’ of a formal economic evaluation planned by the Commission in the years to come which will also cover the whole set of other substantive legal rules laid down in Council Directive 2008/118/EC concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and review the functioning of the EU Excise Movement and Control System (EMCS), the computerised system for monitoring movements of excise goods under suspension of excise duty within the EU.
The report comprises three sections devoted to the implementation of determined horizontal aspects of EU excise legislation :
1) Information on the movement and surveillance of excisable products : in 2003 the European Parliament and the Council adopted a Decision 1152/2003/EC mandating the computerisation of the movement and surveillance of excise products.
The Decision requires the Commission to report to the Parliament and the Council on its implementation.
The overwhelming majority of stakeholders consider that in general the aims of the Decision have been implemented satisfactorily and believe that EMCS represents a major improvement over the previous paper based system.
Nevertheless, the stakeholders have made numerous useful suggestions for improvements, regarding EMCS which should be examined :
· the links between EMCS and customs applications do not work satisfactorily, requiring manual interventions by economic operators and the Member State administrations ;
· the arrangements for the handling of exceptions to normal sequence of events during a movement are not always well defined ;
· economic operators still sometimes suffer delays due to delayed distribution of information about the authorisations of economic operators in other Member States;
· some consignees and some Member States acting as Member States of Destination still experience problems with the quality of data received from consignors.
The Commission will take these suggestions into account for future legal and technical work.
2) Printed version of the electronic administrative document and arrangements for fall back : Council Directive 2008/118/EC requires the Commission to provide a report concerning EMCS FallBack Procedures, and the print-out of the accompanying document.
A large majority of the respondents were satisfied with the fallback procedure in Directive 2008/118/EC but expressed the need for a standardised fallback document across all Member States with a fixed lay-out. Reducing the need to resort to the fallback procedure by investigating ways to improve the availability of national EMCS access is also a priority for some trader respondents.
The Commission will look at incorporating these suggestions into a future revision of Commission Regulation (EC) 684/2009.
3) Lastly, the report summarises the consultation of Member States concerning their first experiences with Council Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 on administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties.
Member States feel that the new arrangements are an improvement over the previous systems based on e-forms, giving better control of workflow and a readily available archive of administrative cooperation information.
Various suggestions for improvements to EMCS functionality were made , which the Commission will take up for inclusion in the future evolution of EMCS and where necessary the corresponding implementing acts.
The Commission intends to take these up, together with Member States in the relevant technical work, where appropriate including implementing acts.
On this basis a more comprehensive evaluation of the EU excise system and notably of the whole of EMCS and the implementation of Directive 2008/118/EC in its entirety will be carried out with a view to a possible legislative reform initiative as of 2015.
PURPOSE: to recast and modernise excise duty arrangements in the EU in order to combat excise duty fraud more effectively and to increase transparency for the taxation of excise duty.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Directive 2008/118/EC concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC.
CONTENT: this Directive lays down general arrangements in relation to excise duty which is levied directly or indirectly on the consumption of: (a) energy products and electricity covered by Directive 2003/96/EC; (b) alcohol and alcoholic beverages covered by Directives 92/83/EEC and 92/84/EEC; (c) manufactured tobacco covered by Directives 95/59/EC, 92/79/EEC and 92/80/EEC.
The new Directive provides a legal framework for the use of the Excise Movement and Control System (EMCS) , established by Decision No 1152/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, which shall be applicable from 1 April 2010. The current Council Directive 92/12/EC will be repealed as of that date.
The EMCS will provide a simplified and paperless environment for trade and will help to better tackle excise fraud by creating a faster and more efficient means of information exchange between excise authorities.
The new Directive also allows Member States to simplify existing rules for commercial movements , including distance sales, of excise goods from one Member State to another on which excise duty has already been paid in the Member State of dispatch.
The Directive also includes elements designed to simplify and liberalise the rules on intra-Community movements of goods (mainly alcohol and tobacco) on which excise duty has already been paid in a Member State.
For private individuals , the Directive aims to clarify the existing rules on moving goods from one Member State to another, and to bring them more into line with the internal market principle that products acquired by private individuals for their own use should be taxed in the Member State in which they are bought. In terms of the rules applicable to intra-Community movements of goods, Member States may lay down guide levels , solely as a form of evidence, which may not be lower than:
(a) for tobacco products:
cigarettes: 800 items; cigarillos (cigars weighing not more than 3 g each): 400 items; cigars: 200 items; smoking tobacco: 1 kg;
(b) for alcoholic beverages :
spirit drinks: 10 litres; intermediate products: 20 litres; wines: 90 litres (including a maximum of 60 litres of sparkling wines); beers: 110 litres.
Member States may also provide that excise duty shall become due in the Member State of consumption on the acquisition of mineral oils already released for consumption in another Member State if such products are transported using atypical modes of transport by a private individual or on his behalf.
For goods moved for commercial purposes , the Directive proposes to maintain the basic principle that excise is payable in the Member State of destination, but to harmonise and simplify the procedures to be followed in that Member State . In this context, "held for commercial purposes" has been defined.
Lastly, Member States may exempt from payment of excise duty excise goods supplied by tax-free shops which are carried away in the personal luggage of travellers to a third territory or to a third country taking a flight or sea-crossing. However, the Directive provides for a transitional period (until 1 January 2017) during which Member States are authorised to continue to exempt from excise duty goods supplied by existing tax-free shops situated at their land border with a third country.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 15/01/2009.
TRANSPOSITION: 01/01/2010.
APPLICATION: 01/04/2010.
The European Parliament adopted, by 328 votes to 319 with 34 abstentions, a legislative resolution, amending the proposal for a Council directive concerning the general arrangements for excise duty. The report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Astrid LULLING (EPP-DE, LU), on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs.
The main amendments – adopted in the framework of the consultation procedure – are as follows:
Definitions : Parliament inserted definitions for 'importation of excise goods', 'registered consignee', 'registered consignor, 'authorised warehouse keeper', 'tax warehouse', and 'place of importation'.
Incurrence of excise duty : the amendments aim to :
clarify the circumstances applicable to the importation of excise goods; clarify the cases when national authorities would subject the destruction of goods under a duty suspension arrangement; define the case when the excise goods under suspension of excise duty do not arrive at their destination, due to an irregularity; remove any uncertainty with regard to excise duty liability in the case of an irregularity taking place and the place of release for consumption being known; clarify the position as regards liability where the excise stamps of one Member State are subject to an irregularity in another Member State .
Exemptions: Members propose that excise goods will be exempted from payment of excise duty where they are intended for delivery to an approved research and development facility, laboratory, government department or other approved party for the purpose of quality testing, pre-market introductory examination and verification for possible counterfeiting, provided that the goods involved are not deemed to be in commercial quantities.. The refund conditions established by the Member State shall not result in unduly burdensome exemption procedures. Excise duty, including that on petroleum oils, may be reimbursed or remitted in accordance with the procedure laid down by each Member State. A Member State shall apply the same procedure to national goods as to those from other Member States.
Duty-free shops : Member States may exempt from payment of excise duty excise goods supplied by tax-free shops which are carried away in the personal luggage of travellers taking a flight, sea-crossing or land-crossing to a third territory or to a third country. The Commission's original proposal had suggested that air and sea travellers should have access to duty free purchases only when their immediate destination was outside the EU. Parliament felt that those with a final destination outside the EU should also be able to take advantage of duty free shopping at each stop along the route to a third country. The Commission's proposal had the effect of abolishing duty free shops on external land borders, but MEPs voted to keep them.
Production, processing and holding of excise goods: where the excise duty has not been paid, this shall take place in a tax warehouse . The Commission proposal had stated that the authorisation to open and run a tax warehouse will be regulated by competent authorities in the Member State where the warehouse is situated. Members feel that this authorisation shall be subject to conditions that the authorities may lay down for the purposes of preventing any possible evasion or abuse. However, it may not be refused on the sole ground that the natural or legal person is established in another Member State.
Movement of excise goods under suspension of excise duty: Members wish to specify that Excise goods may be moved under suspension of excise duty between two points within the territory of the Community, including through a third country or through a region in a third country. They also propose that third parties acting on behalf of the persons mentioned should be allowed to provide the guarantee covering the risks inherent in the movement under suspension of excise duty . In addition, an amendment states that, the competent authorities of the Member State of dispatch may, under conditions they have set, allow for an overall guarantee to be provided for lower excise duties, or for no guarantee to be provided, provided that fiscal responsibility for the transport is at the same time assumed by the party responsible for the transport. This authorisation will only be granted to certain specified persons. The point at which the goods leave the tax warehouse or the place of importation shall be determined by the dispatch of a supplementary information message without delay to the competent authority by the authorised warehouse keeper or the registered consignor.
Furthermore, Parliament introduced amendments to aiming to: (a) give Member States the possibility of monitoring the flows in real time and of carrying out the requisite checks where necessary (Decision No 1152/2003/EC); (b) to determine precisely the transition from the suspensive warehousing arrangements or suspensive temporary storage arrangements to the suspensive arrangements on movements covered, if necessary, by a guarantee provided by another party.
Procedure to be followed on a movement of excise goods under suspension of excise duty : given that the EMCS system will only be deployed in phases, Members felt that the presence of a printout containing the administrative reference code for the goods dispatched, amongst other information, is essential so as not to hamper roadside inspections on intra-Community transport. A further amendment introduces two conditions if the "consignor" wishes to split a movement under suspension into two or more movements, and an obligation for Member States to inform the Commission of the authorised splitting consignments. In addition, the competent authorities of the Member State of dispatch shall forward the report of export to the consignor no later than the working day following reception of the certificate stating that the excise goods have left the territory of the Community.
Tobacco and alcohol : Members felt that the indicative limits in Directive 92/12/EC not be deleted, as the Commission had proposed. Member States' guide levels shall be no less than:
(a) for tobacco products:
- 400 cigarettes;
- 200 cigarillos (cigars of a maximum weight of 3 grammes each);
- 100 cigars,
- 0,5 kilogramme of smoking tobacco;
(b) for alcoholic beverages:
- 5 litres of spirit drinks;
- 10 litres of intermediate products;
- 45 litres of wine (including a maximum
of 30 litres of sparkling wine);
- 55 litres of beer.
Member States may also provide for excise duty to become chargeable in the Member State of consumption in respect of the acquisition of mineral oils already released for consumption in another Member State if those goods have been moved atypically by or for private individuals. Atypical movement may include the movement of fuel in containers other than the vehicle tank or a suitable spare fuel container or the movement of liquid heating fuels by means other than tankers being used for a commercial entrepreneur.
Distance selling : Parliament specified that the vendor should obtain an identification document from the authorities of the Member State of dispatch before commencing his distance selling activities.
A new recital states that, to enhance the functioning of the internal market, further efforts should be made to come to a gradual harmonisation of excise duty within the European Union, while taking into account matters such as public health, the protection of the environment and budgetary considerations.
The Council agreed on a general approach , pending the opinion of the European Parliament and the lifting of a parliamentary reservation by one delegation, on a draft Directive adapting the current excise duty arrangements in the EU and permitting the introduction of a computerised excise duty monitoring system.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted a report drafted by Astrid LULLING (EPP-DE, LU), and amended the proposal for a Council directive concerning the general arrangements for excise duty.
The main amendments – adopted in the framework of the consultation procedure – are as follows:
Definitions : the committee inserted definitions for 'importation of excise goods', 'registered consignee', 'registered consignor, 'authorised warehouse keeper', 'tax warehouse', and 'place of importation'.
Time and place of chargeability : the amendments aim to : clarify the circumstances applicable to the importation of excise goods; clarify the cases when national authorities would subject the destruction of goods under a duty suspension arrangement; define the case when the excise goods under suspension of excise duty do not arrive at their destination, due to an irregularity; remove any uncertainty with regard to excise duty liability in the case of an irregularity taking place and the place of release for consumption being known; clarify the position as regards liability where the excise stamps of one Member State are subject to an irregularity in another Member State .
Exemptions: Members propose that excise goods will be exempted from payment of excise duty where they are intended for delivery to an approved research and development facility, laboratory, government department or other approved party for the purpose of quality testing, pre-market introductory examination and verification for possible counterfeiting, provided that the goods involved are not deemed to be in commercial quantities. The refund conditions established by the Member State shall not result in unduly burdensome exemption procedures. In addition, Members felt that, as regards connecting flights, it should remain possible to make tax-free purchases at all stages of a journey undertaken via connecting flights with a third territory or third country as the final destination.
Production, processing and holding of excise goods : where the excise duty has not been paid, this shall take place in a tax warehouse . The Commission proposal had stated that the authorisation to open and run a tax warehouse will be regulated by competent authorities in the Member State where the warehouse is situated. Members feel that this authorisation shall be subject to conditions that the authorities may lay down for the purposes of preventing any possible evasion or abuse. However, it may not be refused on the sole ground that the natural or legal person is established in another Member State.
Movement of excise goods under suspension of excise duty : Members wish to specify the conditions for the movement of excise goods when under suspension of excise duty. They also propose that third parties acting on behalf of the persons mentioned should be allowed to provide the guarantee covering the risks inherent in the movement under suspension of excise duty . In addition, an amendment states that, the competent authorities of the Member State of dispatch may, under conditions they have set, allow for an overall guarantee to be provided for lower excise duties, or for no guarantee to be provided, provided that fiscal responsibility for the transport is at the same time assumed by the party responsible for the transport. This authorisation will only be granted to certain specified persons. The point at which the goods leave the tax warehouse or the place of importation shall be determined by the dispatch of a supplementary information message without delay to the competent authority by the authorised warehouse keeper or the registered consignor.
Furthermore, the committee introduced amendments to aiming to : (a) give Member States the possibility of monitoring the flows in real time and of carrying out the requisite checks where necessary (Decision No 1152/2003/EC); (b) to determine precisely the transition from the suspensive warehousing arrangements or suspensive temporary storage arrangements to the suspensive arrangements on movements covered, if necessary, by a guarantee provided by another party.
Procedure to be followed on a movement of excise goods under suspension of excise duty: Members note that the EMCS system will only be deployed in phases. The presence of a printout containing the administrative reference code for the goods dispatched, amongst other information, is essential so as not to hamper roadside inspections on intra-Community transport. As with the computerised transit system (NCTS), the accompanying printout should contain all the information included in the electronic message. A further amendment introduces two conditions if the "consignor" wishes to split a movement under suspension into two or more movements, and an obligation for Member States to inform the Commission of the authorised splitting consignments. Lastly, the competent authorities of the Member State of dispatch shall forward the report of export to the consignor no later than the working day following reception of the certificate stating that the excise goods have left the territory of the Community.
Acquisition by private individuals : Members felt that, not only should the indicative limits in Directive 92/12/EC not be scrapped, but they should be strengthened by making them compulsory. Free movement in the single market cannot serve as a pretext for avoiding the payment of excise duties, particularly when these respond to public health requirements. Member States' guide levels shall be no less than:
(a) For tobacco products:
- 400 cigarettes;
- 200 cigarillos (cigars of a maximum weight of 3 grammes each);
- 100 cigars,
- 0,5 kilogramme of smoking tobacco;
(b) For alcoholic beverages:
- 5 litres of spirit drinks;
- 10 litres of intermediate products;
- 45 litres of wine (including a maximum
of 30 litres of sparkling wine);
- 55 litres of beer.
Member States may also provide for excise duty to become chargeable in the Member State of consumption in respect of the acquisition of mineral oils already released for consumption in another Member State if those goods have been moved atypically by or for private individuals.
Distance selling : the committee specified that the vendor should obtain an identification document from the authorities of the Member State of dispatch before commencing his distance selling activities.
A new recital states that, to enhance the functioning of the internal market, further efforts should be made to come to a gradual harmonisation of excise duty within the European Union, while taking into account matters such as public health, the protection of the environment and budgetary considerations.
PURPOSE: to replace Council Directive 92/12/EEC on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty, and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products, by introducing the legal basis for the use of the Excise Movement and Control System (EMCS) along with some further changes aiming at more transparency for the taxation of excise duty.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.
BACKGROUND: the provisions contained in Council Directive 92/12/EEC on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products need to be reviewed to take into account the introduction of the Excise Movement and Control System, a supervisory system for movements of goods for which duty has not been paid. This system has been put into place following Decision No 1152/2003/EC on computerising the movement and surveillance of excisable products (see COD/2001/0185 ).
The provisions relating to movements under suspension of excise duty need to be adapted so as to allow such movements to be covered by procedures under this new system. Changes to this effect would provide a simplified and paperless environment for trade, while permitting more integrated, faster and risk oriented control approaches for excise authorities.
Apart from these new provisions, other amendments of the rules set out in Directive 92/12/EEC are considered to be necessary. In particular, it is necessary to: (i) update the language used in the directive, taking into account new legislative standards; (ii) recast the text and take out those provisions which have lost relevance over time; (iii) take account of legal developments and new legal concepts; (iv) simplify and modernise the excise procedures, with the aim of reducing excise obligations for traders, in particular for traders carrying out cross-border business without compromising excise controls.
Given the nature and reach of such changes, it is appropriate to replace Directive 92/12/EEC in its entirety.
These provisions for the private and commercial movement of excise goods within the EU were already proposed by the Commission in 2004 (see CNS/2004/0072 ). However, following discussions in Council, it was decided that they should be suspended until the Commission proposed a complete review of the Directive on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty, as it has now done.
CONTENT: this proposal is in line with the main policies and objectives of the Union. It seeks to simplify procedures and to increase transparency for intra-Community trade, notably through a procedure in which movements of excise goods under suspension of excise duty take place under EMCS. This new procedure also facilitates risk based monitoring procedures for national administrations.
Once operational, it will replace the paper-based procedures and will be a crucial tool for tackling fraud. Moreover, it will facilitate trade by reducing related costs, as guarantees for duties will be released much more quickly.
The EMCS will introduce electronic processing for declaring, monitoring and discharging movements of excise products under suspension of excise duties within the EU. EMCS will therefore:
allow both Member States and traders to monitor movements electronically in real-time; reduce the time needed for the discharge of tax liability for excise movements; provide excise authorities with the essential tools to effectively address fraud by permitting a more integrated, faster and risk oriented approach to controls.
First movements under EMCS are expected to start in 2009.
The Commission's proposal also includes elements to simplify and liberalise the rules on intra-EU movements of products (mainly alcohol) on which excise duty has already been paid in a Member State :
for private individuals, the proposal aims to clarify the existing rules and to bring them more into line with the internal market principle that products acquired by private individuals for their own use should be taxed in the Member State in which they are bought; for goods moved for commercial purposes, the Commission proposes that the basic principle whereby excise duty is payable in the Member State of destination is maintained, but that the procedures to be followed in that Member State are simplified and harmonised.
PURPOSE: to replace Council Directive 92/12/EEC on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty, and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products, by introducing the legal basis for the use of the Excise Movement and Control System (EMCS) along with some further changes aiming at more transparency for the taxation of excise duty.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Directive.
BACKGROUND: the provisions contained in Council Directive 92/12/EEC on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products need to be reviewed to take into account the introduction of the Excise Movement and Control System, a supervisory system for movements of goods for which duty has not been paid. This system has been put into place following Decision No 1152/2003/EC on computerising the movement and surveillance of excisable products (see COD/2001/0185 ).
The provisions relating to movements under suspension of excise duty need to be adapted so as to allow such movements to be covered by procedures under this new system. Changes to this effect would provide a simplified and paperless environment for trade, while permitting more integrated, faster and risk oriented control approaches for excise authorities.
Apart from these new provisions, other amendments of the rules set out in Directive 92/12/EEC are considered to be necessary. In particular, it is necessary to: (i) update the language used in the directive, taking into account new legislative standards; (ii) recast the text and take out those provisions which have lost relevance over time; (iii) take account of legal developments and new legal concepts; (iv) simplify and modernise the excise procedures, with the aim of reducing excise obligations for traders, in particular for traders carrying out cross-border business without compromising excise controls.
Given the nature and reach of such changes, it is appropriate to replace Directive 92/12/EEC in its entirety.
These provisions for the private and commercial movement of excise goods within the EU were already proposed by the Commission in 2004 (see CNS/2004/0072 ). However, following discussions in Council, it was decided that they should be suspended until the Commission proposed a complete review of the Directive on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty, as it has now done.
CONTENT: this proposal is in line with the main policies and objectives of the Union. It seeks to simplify procedures and to increase transparency for intra-Community trade, notably through a procedure in which movements of excise goods under suspension of excise duty take place under EMCS. This new procedure also facilitates risk based monitoring procedures for national administrations.
Once operational, it will replace the paper-based procedures and will be a crucial tool for tackling fraud. Moreover, it will facilitate trade by reducing related costs, as guarantees for duties will be released much more quickly.
The EMCS will introduce electronic processing for declaring, monitoring and discharging movements of excise products under suspension of excise duties within the EU. EMCS will therefore:
allow both Member States and traders to monitor movements electronically in real-time; reduce the time needed for the discharge of tax liability for excise movements; provide excise authorities with the essential tools to effectively address fraud by permitting a more integrated, faster and risk oriented approach to controls.
First movements under EMCS are expected to start in 2009.
The Commission's proposal also includes elements to simplify and liberalise the rules on intra-EU movements of products (mainly alcohol) on which excise duty has already been paid in a Member State :
for private individuals, the proposal aims to clarify the existing rules and to bring them more into line with the internal market principle that products acquired by private individuals for their own use should be taxed in the Member State in which they are bought; for goods moved for commercial purposes, the Commission proposes that the basic principle whereby excise duty is payable in the Member State of destination is maintained, but that the procedures to be followed in that Member State are simplified and harmonised.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2017)0184
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2017)0131
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2013)0850
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2013)0490
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2008/118
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 009 14.01.2009, p. 0012
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)7295
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0541/2008
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Debate in Council: 2901
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1681/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0417/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0417/2008
- Committee opinion: PE409.634
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE412.070
- Committee opinion: PE407.799
- Committee draft report: PE407.726
- Debate in Council: 2872
- Legislative proposal: COM(2008)0078
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2008)0078
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2008)0078 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE407.726
- Committee opinion: PE407.799
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE412.070
- Committee opinion: PE409.634
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0417/2008
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1681/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)7295
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex COM(2013)0850
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2013)0490
- Follow-up document: COM(2017)0184 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2017)0131
Activities
- Astrid LULLING
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Luigi COCILOVO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Elisa FERREIRA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Katerina BATZELI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zsolt László BECSEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Colm BURKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Trevor COLMAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gabriela CREȚU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zuzana ROITHOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Manuel dos SANTOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Margaritis SCHINAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Olle SCHMIDT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marek SIWIEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Peter SKINNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport Lulling A6-0417/2008 - am. 48 #
Rapport Lulling A6-0417/2008 - am. 49 #
Rapport Lulling A6-0417/2008 - am. 54 #
Rapport Lulling A6-0417/2008 - ams. 63+65 #
Rapport Lulling A6-0417/2008 - am. 67 #
Rapport Lulling A6-0417/2008 - am. 47 #
Rapport Lulling A6-0417/2008 - am. 68 #
Rapport Lulling A6-0417/2008 - am. 57 #
Rapport Lulling A6-0417/2008 - am. 58 #
Rapport Lulling A6-0417/2008 - am. 60 #
Rapport Lulling A6-0417/2008 - proposition modifiée Commission #
Rapport Lulling A6-0417/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
61 |
2008/0051(CNS)
2008/06/27
IMCO
7 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a directive Article 31 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive Article 38 – paragraph 2 Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 33 a (new) (33a) The requirements laid down under Commission Regulation (EC) No 884/20011 of 24 April 2001 do not serve to lighten the disproportionate administrative burden imposed on small wine producers. 1 OJ L 128, 10.5.2001, p. 32.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Member States may exempt from payment of excise duty excise goods supplied by tax-free shops which are carried away in the personal luggage of travellers
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point b (b) ‘tax-free shop’ means any establishment situated within an airport or port or on the border of a third country or third territory which fulfils the conditions laid down by the competent public authorities, pursuant in particular to paragraph 3;
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 As regards excise goods
source: PE-409.451
2008/09/17
ITRE
54 amendments...
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) When implementing this Directive Member States shall take into account the need to ensure a high level of human health protection.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 27 Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Where it is possible, through the use of appropriate evidence, to determine beyond reasonable doubt where an irregularity has taken place during a movement under suspension of excise duty giving rise to the release for consumption of excise goods, excise duty shall be liable in the Member State in which the irregularity took place.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Where an irregularity can be proven to have taken place in one Member State, resulting in the release for consumption of excise goods in relation to which the excise tax stamps of the Member State of destination are attached, excise duty shall become payable in the Member State in which the irregularity took place only when the excise duty is reimbursed by the Member State of destination to the economic operator.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. In cases of irregularity where the Member State of destination does not levy excise duty through the use of excise stamps, the excise duty shall become payable to the Member State in which the irregularity took place immediately.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) delivery to an approved R&D facility, laboratory, government department or other approved party for the purpose of quality testing, pre-market introductory examination and verification for possible counterfeiting, provided that the goods involved are not deemed to be in commercial quantities, where: (i) Member States may set the levels of ‘commercial quantities'; and (ii) Member States may establish simplified procedures to facilitate the movement of goods under this point.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Member States may exempt from payment of excise duty excise goods supplied by tax-free shops which are carried away in the personal luggage of travellers taking a flight
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory section 1. The competent authorities of the Member State of dispatch, under the conditions fixed by them, shall require that the risks inherent in the movement under suspension of excise duty are covered by a guarantee, which may be provided by one or more of the following persons or on their behalf:
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 a (new) Article 17a 1. At the request of the person referred to in Article 17(1), the competent authorities of the Member State of dispatch may, under conditions they have set, allow for an overall guarantee to be provided for lower excise duties, or for no guarantee to be provided, provided that fiscal responsibility for the transport is at the same time assumed by the party responsible for the transport. 2. The authorisation referred to in paragraph 1 shall only be granted to persons who fulfil the following conditions: a) are established in the customs territory of the Community; b) have a satisfactory record as regards the provision of guarantees concerning the movement of excise goods under suspension of excise duty; and c) regularly provide guarantees concerning the movement of excise goods under suspension of excise duty or are deemed by the customs authorities to have the ability to meet the obligations upon them in relation to these procedures. 3. The measures governing the procedure for granting the authorisations in application of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 40(2).
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Excise goods may be subject to other indirect taxes for specific purposes. In that case, however, and in order not to jeopardise the useful effect of Community rules relating to indirect taxes, Member States should comply with certain essential elements of those rules, namely the tax base, calculation of the tax and chargeability and monitoring of the tax.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 1. The movement of excise goods under suspension of excise duty shall be deemed to begin when the goods leave the tax warehouse of dispatch or the place of importation. The point at which the goods leave the tax warehouse or the place of importation shall be determined by the dispatch of a supplementary information message without delay to the competent authority by the authorised warehousekeeper or the registered consignor.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 a (new) (4a) In view of the social importance of household electricity and of energy products used to heat dwellings, the Member States should consider the possibility, in these cases, of applying the minimum admissible levels of excise duty, and even of abolishing excise duty, on energy products used for that purpose.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 a (new) Article 19a The rules applicable to the movement of excise goods under suspension of duty should, under conditions set by the competent authorities of the Member State of dispatch, allow for an overall guarantee to be provided for lower excise duties, or for no guarantee to be provided, provided that fiscal responsibility for the transport is at the same time assumed by the party responsible for the transport.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 b (new) (4b) In view of the importance of agriculture to economic development and in ensuring food supply, the Member States could abolish excise duty on diesel fuel used exclusively for agricultural work.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. On receipt of excise goods at any of the destinations referred to in points (i), (ii) or (iv) of Article 16(1)(a) or in Article 16(2), the consignee shall
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a directive Article 24 – paragraph 3 3. The competent authorities of the Member State of dispatch shall forward the report of export to the consignor not later than the working day following reception of the certificate stating that the excise goods have left the territory of the Community.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 9 (9) Since excise duty is a tax on the consumption of certain goods, duty should not be charged in respect of excise goods which have indisputably been destroyed or irretrievably lost, irrespective of the circumstances of the destruction or loss.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 When the
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 a (new) Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a directive Article 26 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. Where the computerised system is not available, an authorised warehousekeeper or a registered consignor may communicate the information referred to in Article 20(8) or Article 22 using alternative means of communication defined by the Member States. To that end he shall inform the competent authorities of the Member State of dispatch at the time
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 24 (24) It is necessary to determine the procedures to be used in a case in which the computerised system is not available for reasons outside the control of, or through no fault of, the operators involved in the movement of excise goods.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a directive Article 29 – paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) movement of goods pursuant to Article 11(ea).
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 29 (29) Where, following their release for consumption in a Member State, excise goods are held in another Member State with a view to their use for commercial purposes, it is necessary to determine whether excise duty is due in the second Member State. For these purposes, it is necessary, in particular, to define the concept of "commercial purposes".
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. Excise duty on excise goods, other than manufactured tobacco, acquired by private individuals for personal use and transported from one Member State to another by them shall be charged only in the Member State in which the excise goods are acquired. Excise duty on manufactured tobacco acquired by private individuals for personal use and transported by them from one Member State to another within the quantitative limits set out in paragraph 2a shall be charged only in the Member State in which the excise goods are acquired. Any manufactured tobacco acquired by private individuals and transported by them from one Member State to another, which exceeds the quantitative limits set out in paragraph 2a shall be subject to excise duty in the Member State of destination. Such excise duty shall be chargeable at the point of arrival in the Member State of destination, and shall be paid in accordance with the procedure laid down by the Member State of destination. The excise duty paid in the Member State of acquisition shall be reimbursed or remitted, at the request of the individual, in accordance with the procedure laid down by the Member State of acquisition.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 36 (36) In order to allow a period of adjustment to the electronic control system for the movement of goods under suspension of excise duty, Member States should be able to benefit from a transitional period during which such movement may continue to be carried out subject to the formalities laid down by Directive 92/12/EEC.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1. Excise duty on excise goods, other than manufactured tobacco as well as alcohol and alcoholic beverages, acquired by private individuals for personal use and transported from one Member State to another by them shall be charged only in
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) In view of the social importance of household electricity and of energy products used to heat dwellings, Member States may, in these cases, apply the minimum admissible levels of excise duty, and even abolish excise duty, on energy products used for that purpose.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. In view of the importance of agriculture to economic development and in ensuring food supply, Member States may abolish excise duty on diesel fuel used exclusively for agricultural work.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. Member States may apply other taxes to excise goods for specific purposes, provided that those taxes comply with the Community tax rules applicable for excise duty or value added tax as far as determination of the tax base, calculation of the tax
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 As regards excise goods other than manufactured tobacco acquired by private individuals, the first subparagraph shall
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 2 – point e Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Article 7 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 The loss or destruction of the excise goods in question shall be proven to the satisfaction of the competent Member State authorities.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. For the purposes of applying paragraph 2(e), Member States may lay down guide levels, solely as a form of evidence. Those guide levels shall be no less than: a) Tobacco products - 800 cigarettes, - 400 cigarillos (cigarillos are cigars of a maximum weight of 3 grams each), - 200 cigars, - 1 kilogramme of smoking tobacco; b) Alcoholic beverages - 10 litres of spirit drinks, - 20 litres of intermediate products, - 90 litres of wines (including a maximum of 60 l of sparkling wines), - 110 litres of beers.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new) Where the time of release for consumption is not known, such release shall be deemed to have taken place at the time the excise goods were dispatched.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. For the purpose of paragraph 1, Member States shall apply mandatory quantitative limits for the following types of tobacco product, subject to the following quantitative limits: (a) 200 cigarettes; (b) 100 cigarillos (cigarillos are cigars of a maximum weight of 3 grams each; (c) 50 cigars; (d) 250 g smoking tobacco.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 2 Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. For the purpose of paragraph 1, Member States shall apply mandatory quantitative limits for the following types of tobacco product and alcoholic beverages, subject to the following quantitative limits: (a) 300 cigarettes; (b) 150 cigarillos (cigarillos are cigars of a maximum weight of 3 grams each); (c) 75 cigars; (d) 400 g smoking tobacco; (e) 5 l spirit drinks; (f) 10 l intermediate products; (g) 45 l wines (including a maximum of 60 l of sparkling wines); (h) 55 l beers.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) delivery to an approved R&D facility, laboratory, government department or other approved party for the purpose of quality testing, pre-market introductory examination and verification for possible counterfeiting, provided that the goods involved are not deemed to be in commercial quantities.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Member States may also provide for excise duty to become chargeable in the Member State of consumption in respect of the acquisition of mineral oils already released for consumption in another Member State if those goods have been moved atypically by or for private individuals. Atypical movement may be considered to denote the movement of fuel in containers other than the vehicle tank or a suitable spare fuel container or the movement of liquid heating fuels by means other than tankers being used for a commercial entrepreneur.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. Exemptions shall be subject to conditions and limitations laid down by the host Member State. Member States may grant the exemption by means of a refund of excise duty. The refund conditions established by the Member State shall not result in unduly complicated exemption procedures.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Member States may also provide for excise duty to become chargeable in the Member State of consumption in respect of the acquisition of mineral oils already released for consumption in another Member State if those goods have been moved atypically by or for private individuals. Atypical movement may be considered to denote the movement of fuel in containers other than the vehicle tank or a suitable spare fuel container or the movement of liquid heating fuels by means other than tankers being used for a commercial entrepreneur.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point b (b) 'tax-free shop' means any establishment situated within an airport or port or on the border with a third country or a third territory, which fulfils the conditions laid down by the competent public authorities, pursuant in particular to paragraph 3;
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a directive Article 30 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Given the need to ensure a high level of human health protection, Member States may apply quantitative limits set below those stated in paragraph 3.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 4 – point c (c) ‘traveller to a third territory or to a third country’ means any passenger holding a transport document, for air or sea travel, stating that the
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a directive Article 34 – paragraph 4 – point a (a) register his identity with the tax authorities of the Member State of dispatch of the excise goods and obtain an identification document from these authorities;
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – introductory wording A temporary registered consignee authorised for the purposes of the first subparagraph shall comply with the following requirements:
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive Article 37 Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 1. A movement of excise goods shall be considered to take place under suspension of excise duty only if it takes place under cover of an electronic administrative document processed in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a directive Article 37 1. Without prejudice to Article 7(1), Member States may require that excise goods carry tax markings
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive Article 38 – paragraph 2 2. ‘Small wine producers’ shall be understood to mean persons producing on average less than
source: PE-412.254
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-407726_EN.html
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-407799_EN.html
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-409634_EN.html
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Amended by 2008/0150(CNS) Amended by 2013/0280(CNS) Amended by 2018/0124(CNS) Repealed by 2018/0176(CNS) Amended by 2021/0418(CNS)
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Amended by 2008/0150(CNS) Amended by 2013/0280(CNS) Amended by 2018/0124(CNS) Repealed by 2018/0176(CNS)
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.726
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.799&secondRef=02
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.070New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE412.070 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.634&secondRef=02
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0417_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0417_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1681)(documentyear:2008)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1681)(documentyear:2008)(documentlanguage:EN) |
events/0/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=78New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=0078 |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0417_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0417_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081117&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20081117&type=CRE |
events/8 |
|
events/8 |
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Amended by 2008/0150(CNS) Amended by 2013/0280(CNS) Amended by 2018/0124(CNS) Repealed by 2018/0176(CNS)
|
procedure/instrument/1 |
Repealing Directive 92/12/EEC Amended by 2008/0150(CNS) Amended by 2013/0280(CNS) Amended by 2018/0124(CNS) Repealed by 2018/0176(CNS)
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-0417&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0417_EN.html |
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=0078New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=78 |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-0417&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0417_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-541New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0541_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-417&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-0417&language=EN |
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-417&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-0417&language=EN |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-0541New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-541 |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/6/60115New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32008L0118New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32008L0118 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
DirectiveNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-417&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-0417&language=EN |
activities/7/docs/1/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-541New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-0541 |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities/7/docs/1/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-0541New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-541 |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|