Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | PECH | VISSER Cornelis ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | ENVI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 043-p2
Legal Basis:
TFEU 043-p2Events
PURPOSE: to establish transitional technical measures from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2011.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Regulation (EC) No 1288/2009 establishing transitional technical measures from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2011.
CONTENT: Council Regulation (EC) No 850/98 for the conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms lays down certain technical measures for the conservation of fishery resources.
Annex III to Council Regulation (EC) No 43/2009 of 16 January 2009 fixing for 2009 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required establishes technical measures until 31 December 2009.
On 4 June 2008, the Commission made a proposal for a Council Regulation concerning the conservation of fisheries resources through technical measures, intended to replace Regulation (EC) No 850/98 and to provide for permanent measures on the transitional technical measures currently laid down in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 43/2009.
Considering that the proposed Council Regulation will not be adopted before the date on which the measures provided for in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 43/2009 cease to apply, it is necessary for the reasons of legal certainty as well as of maintaining the proper conservation and management of marine resources to provide for the continuation of those measures for a transitional period of 18 months (from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2011).
With a view to further reducing unwanted catches, the prohibition of high grading as provided for in point 5b of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 43/2009 should be extended to all ICES zones.
The measures transposing into Community law the recommendations established by the Northeast Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC) should be amended in order to ensure compliance with the recommendations applicable in 2010.
The measures laid down in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 43/2009 cease to apply as from 1 January 2010, this Regulation should be applicable as from that date.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 31/12/2009.
APPLICATION: from 01/01/2010 to 30/06/2011.
The Council made substantial progress on a draft regulation on technical measures to better conserve fish stocks, to cut down discards and to protect vulnerable marine habitats on Europe's Atlantic coast and in the North Sea and the Skagerrak and Kattegat.
Together with catch and effort limitations, technical measures play a key role in ensuring sustainable fisheries . In particular, they help to protect juvenile fish in order to reduce the threat to future yields.
The Council has agreed to hand over this issue to the Spanish Presidency, as it will have to be concluded under the co-decision procedure.
As Regulation (EC) 850/98 is still in force, certain technical measures will continue to apply while the Council did reach political agreement on transitional technical measures for 2010, extending for 18 months the transitional technical measures contained in Annex III to the 2009 TACs and Quotas Regulation.
Due to the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty on 1 December 2009, the proposal will be adopted by written procedure after finalisation by the legal/linguistic experts.
The European Parliament adopted by 581 votes to 16, with 32 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending, under the consultation procedure, the proposal for a Council regulation concerning the conservation of fisheries resources through technical measures.
The main amendments are as follows:
Regional regulations : the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 37 of the Treaty, adopt the measures applicable specifically in the various regions corresponding to the various Regional Advisory Councils (RACs).
Minimum landing size of living aquatic resources : an amendments notes that, in the case of small pelagics (sardine, anchovy, horse mackerel and mackerel), the possibility for 10% of catches to be made up of undersized fish shall be maintained.
Combinations of nets : the proposed regulation provides that it shall be prohibited to carry on board, during any fishing voyage, any combination of nets of more than one range of mesh size. MEPs favour a more flexible approach: the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall regulate cases where vessels may carry on board one or more than one combination of nets of more than one range of mesh size during the same fishing voyage. These criteria shall take account of:
the distance between the home port of the vessel concerned and the fishing area; the degree to which the fishery being practised is a multi-species fishery and the economic importance of secondary species by comparison with the target species; whether any of the fishing operations during a particular voyage are carried out using a net with a mesh size larger than those provided for in this Regulation.
Gillnets : according to MEPs, the immersion time of gillnets and trammel nets shall not exceed 24 hours (48 hours under the proposal). Where fishing is conducted using gillnets and trammel nets, the use of more than 40 km of nets shall be prohibited (50 km under the proposal).
By way of derogation, it shall be permitted to deploy gillnets with a mesh size equal to or greater than 120 mm and less than 150 mm north of 48°N or with a mesh size equal to or greater than 100 mm and less than 130 mm south of 48°N, in waters of less than 400 metres (instead of 600 metres) charted depth, under certain conditions. Moreover, the total length of all nets deployed at any one time shall not exceed 60 km per vessel (instead of 100 km).
Towed gear : MEPs deleted the Commission’s proposal prohibiting the use of any towed gear with a mesh size equal to or larger than 80 mm having more than 100 open meshes and less than 40 open meshes in any circumference of the codend, excluding the joining or the selvedges.
Moving immediately to another area when maximum by-catches are exceeded in a given area : by way of derogation, for local and inshore fisheries with particular characteristics owing to both the depth and composition of the seabed and distance from the coast, and subject to a scientific report substantiating those characteristics, the obligation to move away may be less than five nautical miles provided that it is guaranteed that fishing activity is not carried out on a concentration of juveniles.
Emergency conservation measures taken by Member States : before such measures are implemented, the appropriate Regional Advisory Councils and the Commission shall be consulted. MEPs consider that consultation by the Commission should take place to prevent competition distortion.
Future regulation : MEPs believe that certain important questions should be addressed by a Council Regulation:
the minimum and maximum percentages of the target species among the living aquatic resources retained on board; the mesh size ranges admissible for each target species; provisions for the reduction or elimination of discards and the improvement of the selectivity of fishing gear; measures concerning the restriction of fishing activities in specific periods and/or specific areas referred to in the regulation, on the basis of the best scientific information available in order to protect marine habitats in those areas.
Lastly, the entry into force of the regulation shall provide for a period for the adjustment of fleets and the adoption of supplementary rules.
The Committee on Fisheries adopted the report drawn up by Cornelis VISSER (EPP-ED, NL) amending, under the consultation procedure, the proposal for a Council regulation concerning the conservation of fisheries resources through technical measures.
The main amendments are as follows:
Regional regulations : the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 37 of the Treaty, adopt the measures applicable specifically in the various regions corresponding to the various Regional Advisory Councils (RACs).
Minimum landing size of living aquatic resources : an amendments notes that, in the case of small pelagics (sardine, anchovy, horse mackerel and mackerel), the possibility for 10% of catches to be made up of undersized fish shall be maintained.
Combinations of nets : the proposed regulation provides that it shall be prohibited to carry on board, during any fishing voyage, any combination of nets of more than one range of mesh size. MEPs favour a more flexible approach: the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, shall regulate cases where vessels may carry on board one or more than one combination of nets of more than one range of mesh size during the same fishing voyage. The criteria should take a number of elements into account.
Gillnets : according to MEPs, the immersion time of gillnets and trammel nets shall not exceed 24 hours (48 hours under the proposal). Where fishing is conducted using gillnets and trammel nets, the use of more than 40 km of nets shall be prohibited (50 km under the proposal). Moreover, the total length of all nets deployed at any one time shall not exceed 60 km per vessel (instead of 100 km).
Towed gear : MEPs deleted the Commission’s proposal prohibiting the use of any towed gear with a mesh size equal to or larger than 80 mm having more than 100 open meshes and less than 40 open meshes in any circumference of the codend, excluding the joining or the selvedges.
Emergency conservation measures taken by Member States : before such measures are implemented, the appropriate Regional Advisory Councils and the Commission shall be consulted. MEPs consider that consultation by the Commission should take place to prevent competition distortion.
Future regulation : MEPs believe that certain important questions should be addressed by a Council Regulation:
the minimum and maximum percentages of the target species among the living aquatic resources retained on board; the mesh size ranges admissible for each target species; provisions for the reduction or elimination of discards and the improvement of the selectivity of fishing gear; measures concerning the restriction of fishing activities in specific periods and/or specific areas referred to in the regulation, on the basis of the best scientific information available in order to protect marine habitats in those areas.
Lastly, the entry into force of the regulation shall provide for a period for the adjustment of fleets and the adoption of supplementary rules.
PURPOSE: to simplify the rules concerning the conservation of fisheries resources through technical measures.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.
BACKGROUND: during the 2002 reform of the Common Fisheries Policy, the Commission and Council agreed to implement progressively recovery, management and long-term plans concerning fisheries resources of interest to the Community. Such plans have been established concerning most stocks of cod in Community waters, two stocks of hake, two stocks of nephrops, two stocks of sole as well as stocks of plaice and sole in the North Sea, whereby the conditions laid down in Regulation (EC) No 850/98 have been amended and/or augmented.
In June 2004, under the initiative of the Irish Presidency, the Commission presented a Communication to the Council and the European Parliament: “Promoting more environmentally-friendly fishing methods: the role of technical conservation measures” ( INI/2004/2199 ). Subsequently, the Council adopted conclusions on 21 June 2004, in which the Council invited the Commission to present a new proposal on technical measures in the Atlantic, to replace Council Regulation (EC) No 850/98 of 30 March 1998 for the conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms. The 2006 – 2008 Action Plan for simplifying and improving the Common Fisheries Policy (the Action Plan), sets out that priority is to be given to simplifying legislation concerning measures for the conservation of fish stocks through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms, currently set out in Regulation (EC) No 850/98 after consulting the Member States and the industry.
The simplification of the technical measures governing fisheries on Europe's Atlantic coast is long overdue. Technical measures are a vital tool not only for the conservation of stocks in general, but more specifically in the fight to bring discarding down to the lowest possible level, and to ensure that EU fisheries are environmentally friendly. By proceeding on a regional basis, the Commission will be able to avoid the trap of micro-management, and ensure that the specific measures taken are truly in line with conditions in particular fisheries
CONTENT: this proposal intends to simplify the current regulatory framework concerning the conservation of fisheries resources through technical measures by replacing:
Council Regulation (EC) No 850/98 of 30 March 1998 for the conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms. Council Regulation (EC) No 2549/2000 of 17 November 2000 establishing additional technical measures for the recovery of the stock of cod in the Irish Sea (ICES Division VIIa).
Council Regulation (EC) No 850/98 embodies the current conditions for Community waters outside the Baltic Sea, the Black Sea and the Mediterranean Sea relating to technical measures for the conservation of fish stocks by protection of juveniles of marine organisms. The technical measures define mesh sizes and other aspects of the structure of fishing gears, time periods and geographical areas within which defined types of fishing are prohibited or restricted and minimum landing sizes of marine organisms.
In addition, Regulation (EC) No 850/98 has been the subject of 10 amending Regulations not necessarily related to long-term plans. It is necessary to incorporate all of these revised conditions in a comprehensive package of technical measures. This package of technical measures is intended to achieve a broad range of objectives. A key objective is the protection of juvenile fish and an important part of these measures is designed to limit their capture, for example, by measures to improve the selectivity of fishing gear or fixing certain closed seasons/areas. Other measures are intended to protect certain species or ecosystems by limiting fishing effort, for example, by the adoption of closures. The need to reduce discards is also reflected in the adoption of appropriate technical measures. Furthermore, technical measures should be adapted to the context of the establishment of Regional Advisory Councils (RACs). A balance needs to be established between measures which are generally applicable in all areas and measures which are applicable specifically on a regional basis as defined by the Regional Advisory Council (RAC) Areas or in the waters off the coasts of the French departments of Guyana, Martinique, Guadalupe and Reunion that come under the sovereignty or jurisdiction of France.
The objective of this proposal is not to change the level of ambition of the technical conservation measures, for instance by a major shift towards larger mesh sizes. Although the Commission considers that sustainable fishing, particularly for demersal fisheries, calls for a substantial increase in the selectivity of fishing gear, the priority is to establish a new set of simpler, clearer rules. Improvements in selectivity will then be brought about gradually through future amendments of these rules, in parallel with the general improvement in the conservation status of Community fish stocks to be achieved through other elements of conservation policy, such as multi-annual plans. All provisions must be simple, understandable, and controllable and must have a positive effect on the conservation of the species, on the protection of the marine habitats or on the reduction of discards.
The proposal applies to commercial and recreational fishing in all European waters except for the Mediterranean Sea, the Baltic Sea, the Black Sea, and in fisheries for highly migratory fish stocks in all waters, for which specific rules apply. It will bring together most of the existing technical measures in various Community regulations for the Atlantic and the North Sea, although a few measures that are currently in separate regulations will remain separate.
Harmonisation / regionalisation : t he Commission believes that a regional approach should be favoured, since this would be more amenable to the involvement of the stakeholders in the process. The involvement of stakeholders is essential because it leads to commitment to the measures and ensure a greater likelihood of compliance of the adopted measures. Such regionalisation would not mean re-nationalisation of the technical measures. The regulation will not alter the balance of competences between the Community and Member States as laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002.
Guiding principles vs. technical or regional rules : t he proposed Council Regulation concentrates on measures that would be expected to be permanent. It would also, however, lay down the procedures to be applied when dealing with measures that would be expected to evolve rather quickly and with measures that are very technical. For the latter, the Regulation should favour the application of a procedure for adoption of new rules through comitology procedure. This approach is intended to meet the concern of Member States to reduce or eliminate interim technical measures from the annual TAC and quota regulation, while taking account of the fact that the application of technical measures is very often a matter of urgency.
Evaluation : a common priority for the Member States, the European Parliament and stakeholders is the need to evaluate, before and after their implementation, the consequences of technical measures. The effectiveness of many of the provisions under Regulation (EC) No 850/98 has never been evaluated, and those measures have remained in force regardless of their value for conservation. A fundamental principle will be that the measures provided for in this Regulation should be evaluated after a certain time to reassess the need for them. Another guiding principle will be that when new and substantial measures are proposed (such as significant increases in mesh sizes), the Commission will carry out, if the data available allow it, a prior evaluation of their likely effects.
Further new measures introduced in this proposal specifically to help cut down on discards, and which would apply throughout the North Sea and North East Atlantic, include:
provisions for Member States to implement real-time closures of areas where strong concentrations of juveniles are detected for periods of up to 10 days; a reduction in the number of species subject to a minimum landing size, to focus on the target species of the fisheries concerned; the general application of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO) rule that, when undersized fish account for more than 10% of the catch of a target species, the vessel must change gear or move on; greater flexibility in the application of by-catch rules designed to discourage discarding.
PURPOSE: to simplify the rules concerning the conservation of fisheries resources through technical measures.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Regulation.
BACKGROUND: during the 2002 reform of the Common Fisheries Policy, the Commission and Council agreed to implement progressively recovery, management and long-term plans concerning fisheries resources of interest to the Community. Such plans have been established concerning most stocks of cod in Community waters, two stocks of hake, two stocks of nephrops, two stocks of sole as well as stocks of plaice and sole in the North Sea, whereby the conditions laid down in Regulation (EC) No 850/98 have been amended and/or augmented.
In June 2004, under the initiative of the Irish Presidency, the Commission presented a Communication to the Council and the European Parliament: “Promoting more environmentally-friendly fishing methods: the role of technical conservation measures” ( INI/2004/2199 ). Subsequently, the Council adopted conclusions on 21 June 2004, in which the Council invited the Commission to present a new proposal on technical measures in the Atlantic, to replace Council Regulation (EC) No 850/98 of 30 March 1998 for the conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms. The 2006 – 2008 Action Plan for simplifying and improving the Common Fisheries Policy (the Action Plan), sets out that priority is to be given to simplifying legislation concerning measures for the conservation of fish stocks through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms, currently set out in Regulation (EC) No 850/98 after consulting the Member States and the industry.
The simplification of the technical measures governing fisheries on Europe's Atlantic coast is long overdue. Technical measures are a vital tool not only for the conservation of stocks in general, but more specifically in the fight to bring discarding down to the lowest possible level, and to ensure that EU fisheries are environmentally friendly. By proceeding on a regional basis, the Commission will be able to avoid the trap of micro-management, and ensure that the specific measures taken are truly in line with conditions in particular fisheries
CONTENT: this proposal intends to simplify the current regulatory framework concerning the conservation of fisheries resources through technical measures by replacing:
Council Regulation (EC) No 850/98 of 30 March 1998 for the conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms. Council Regulation (EC) No 2549/2000 of 17 November 2000 establishing additional technical measures for the recovery of the stock of cod in the Irish Sea (ICES Division VIIa).
Council Regulation (EC) No 850/98 embodies the current conditions for Community waters outside the Baltic Sea, the Black Sea and the Mediterranean Sea relating to technical measures for the conservation of fish stocks by protection of juveniles of marine organisms. The technical measures define mesh sizes and other aspects of the structure of fishing gears, time periods and geographical areas within which defined types of fishing are prohibited or restricted and minimum landing sizes of marine organisms.
In addition, Regulation (EC) No 850/98 has been the subject of 10 amending Regulations not necessarily related to long-term plans. It is necessary to incorporate all of these revised conditions in a comprehensive package of technical measures. This package of technical measures is intended to achieve a broad range of objectives. A key objective is the protection of juvenile fish and an important part of these measures is designed to limit their capture, for example, by measures to improve the selectivity of fishing gear or fixing certain closed seasons/areas. Other measures are intended to protect certain species or ecosystems by limiting fishing effort, for example, by the adoption of closures. The need to reduce discards is also reflected in the adoption of appropriate technical measures. Furthermore, technical measures should be adapted to the context of the establishment of Regional Advisory Councils (RACs). A balance needs to be established between measures which are generally applicable in all areas and measures which are applicable specifically on a regional basis as defined by the Regional Advisory Council (RAC) Areas or in the waters off the coasts of the French departments of Guyana, Martinique, Guadalupe and Reunion that come under the sovereignty or jurisdiction of France.
The objective of this proposal is not to change the level of ambition of the technical conservation measures, for instance by a major shift towards larger mesh sizes. Although the Commission considers that sustainable fishing, particularly for demersal fisheries, calls for a substantial increase in the selectivity of fishing gear, the priority is to establish a new set of simpler, clearer rules. Improvements in selectivity will then be brought about gradually through future amendments of these rules, in parallel with the general improvement in the conservation status of Community fish stocks to be achieved through other elements of conservation policy, such as multi-annual plans. All provisions must be simple, understandable, and controllable and must have a positive effect on the conservation of the species, on the protection of the marine habitats or on the reduction of discards.
The proposal applies to commercial and recreational fishing in all European waters except for the Mediterranean Sea, the Baltic Sea, the Black Sea, and in fisheries for highly migratory fish stocks in all waters, for which specific rules apply. It will bring together most of the existing technical measures in various Community regulations for the Atlantic and the North Sea, although a few measures that are currently in separate regulations will remain separate.
Harmonisation / regionalisation : t he Commission believes that a regional approach should be favoured, since this would be more amenable to the involvement of the stakeholders in the process. The involvement of stakeholders is essential because it leads to commitment to the measures and ensure a greater likelihood of compliance of the adopted measures. Such regionalisation would not mean re-nationalisation of the technical measures. The regulation will not alter the balance of competences between the Community and Member States as laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002.
Guiding principles vs. technical or regional rules : t he proposed Council Regulation concentrates on measures that would be expected to be permanent. It would also, however, lay down the procedures to be applied when dealing with measures that would be expected to evolve rather quickly and with measures that are very technical. For the latter, the Regulation should favour the application of a procedure for adoption of new rules through comitology procedure. This approach is intended to meet the concern of Member States to reduce or eliminate interim technical measures from the annual TAC and quota regulation, while taking account of the fact that the application of technical measures is very often a matter of urgency.
Evaluation : a common priority for the Member States, the European Parliament and stakeholders is the need to evaluate, before and after their implementation, the consequences of technical measures. The effectiveness of many of the provisions under Regulation (EC) No 850/98 has never been evaluated, and those measures have remained in force regardless of their value for conservation. A fundamental principle will be that the measures provided for in this Regulation should be evaluated after a certain time to reassess the need for them. Another guiding principle will be that when new and substantial measures are proposed (such as significant increases in mesh sizes), the Commission will carry out, if the data available allow it, a prior evaluation of their likely effects.
Further new measures introduced in this proposal specifically to help cut down on discards, and which would apply throughout the North Sea and North East Atlantic, include:
provisions for Member States to implement real-time closures of areas where strong concentrations of juveniles are detected for periods of up to 10 days; a reduction in the number of species subject to a minimum landing size, to focus on the target species of the fisheries concerned; the general application of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO) rule that, when undersized fish account for more than 10% of the catch of a target species, the vessel must change gear or move on; greater flexibility in the application of by-catch rules designed to discourage discarding.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2009/1288
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 347 24.12.2009, p. 0006
- Debate in Council: 2976
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3507
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0256/2009
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0206/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0206/2009
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0336/2009
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE415.057
- Committee draft report: PE414.121
- Legislative proposal: COM(2008)0324
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)1977
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)1978
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2008)0324
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2008)0324 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)1977 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)1978 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE414.121
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE415.057
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0336/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A6-0206/2009
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3507
Activities
- Carmen FRAGA ESTÉVEZ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Gérard ONESTA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Paulo CASACA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Avril DOYLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport VISSER A6-0206/2009 - résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
31 |
2008/0112(CNS)
2009/02/16
PECH
31 amendments...
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) Given that both the homogeneous rules which are generally applicable in all areas and those applicable specifically on a regional basis are of similar importance for fisheries management, they should be adopted by the Council.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) As an additional clarification, in order to prevent future disputes due to the misinterpretation of rules, and in line with the approach recently introduced, the Commission should supplement the provisions of this Regulation by publishing an annex containing illustrations to explain the characteristics of fishing gear.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) It is necessary to prevent situations that cause distortions of competition or confusion among operators and consumers and that could lead to failure to comply with minimum sizes, and therefore the rules should also apply to products deriving from imports. To this end, the Commission should submit, as soon as possible, a proposal to amend Council Regulation (EC) No 104/20001, in order to harmonise biological sizes with marketing sizes. 1 Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products (OJ L 17 21.1.2000, p. 22).
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15)
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) Where conservation is seriously threatened, the Commission
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) The measures necessary for the implementation of this Regulation
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 a (new) Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 - paragraph 1 1. A living aquatic resource shall be considered as undersized if it is smaller than the minimum landing size specified in Annex
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 - paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. In the case of small pelagics (sardine, anchovy, horse mackerel and mackerel) the possibility for 10% of catches to be made up of undersized fish shall be maintained.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 - paragraph 2 - point b a (new) (ba) use strengthening bags on the outside of the codend on vessels licensed for trawl nets with a mesh size equal to or larger than 60 mm in ICES zones VIII, IX and X;
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 - paragraph 3 - point b Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 - paragraph 3 - point b (b) any codend of mesh size equal to or greater than 80 mm in which any mesh is not squa
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 - paragraph 2 2. The immersion time of gillnets and trammel nets shall not exceed 24
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 - paragraph 3 3. Where fishing is conducted using gillnets and trammel nets, the use of more than
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 - paragraph 1 1. By way of derogation from Article 8, it shall be permitted to deploy gillnets with a mesh size equal to or greater than 120 mm and less than 150 mm north of 48°N or with a mesh size equal to or greater than 100 mm and less than 130 mm south of 48°N, in waters of less than
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 - paragraph 2 2. By way of derogation from Article 8, it shall be permitted to deploy gillnets with a mesh size equal to or greater than 250 mm, in waters of less than 600 metres charted depth, provided that they are no more than
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 - paragraph 1 1. Where the quantity of undersized fish caught, in accordance with Annex I, exceeds 10% of the total quantity of the catches in any one haul, and this situation recurs in a series of three consecutive hauls, the vessel shall move away to a distance of at least five nautical miles from any position of the previous haul before continuing fishing. By way of derogation from the previous subparagraph, for local and inshore fisheries with particular characteristics owing to both the depth and composition of the seabed and distance from the coast, and subject to a scientific report substantiating these characteristics, the obligation to move away may be less than five nautical miles provided that it is guaranteed that fishing activity is not carried out on a concentration of juveniles.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 - paragraph 1 1. Where the quantity of undersized fish caught exceeds 10% of the total quantity of the catches in
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 - title Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 - paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 - paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 - paragraph 2 2. If the minimum and/or maximum
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 The catching, retention on board, the transhipment, storage, landing, sale, display or offer for sale of marine organisms caught using methods incorporating the use of explosives, poisonous or stupefying substances, electric current or any kind of projectile shall be prohibited, except pulse trawl fishing.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 - paragraph 2 2. Where any delay in reducing or eliminating discards would result in damage which would be difficult to repair, the Commission, on its own initiative or at the substantiated request of a Member State, may take appropriate non- discriminatory conservation measures in respect of the waters under
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 - introductory part Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 - point d (d) measures concerning the restriction of
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 - point d a (new) (da) the combinations of nets referred to in Article 5;
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 - paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The Commission may adopt detailed rules for the implementation of certain technical aspects of this Regulation in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 30(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002. These rules may include: - technical rules for determining and calculating mesh size, - lists and technical descriptions of equipment or devices that may be attached to nets, - rules on gear materials, - technical modifications to this Regulation that do not justify a procedure within the framework of Article 22 of this Regulation.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 - paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The entry into force of this Regulation shall provide for a period for the adjustment of fleets and the adoption of supplementary rules.
source: PE-415.057
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/3/date |
Old
2009-04-02T00:00:00New
2009-04-01T00:00:00 |
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=CNS&year=2008&number=0112&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=CNS&year=2008&number=0112&appLng=EN |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE414.121New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE414.121 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.057New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE415.057 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0336)(documentyear:2009)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0336)(documentyear:2009)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0206_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0206_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=17082&j=0&l=en
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0206_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0206_EN.html |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090421&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090421&type=CRE |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/1977/COM_SEC(2008)1977_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/1977/COM_SEC(2008)1977_EN.pdf |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-206&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0206_EN.html |
docs/6/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0324/COM_COM(2008)0324_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0324/COM_COM(2008)0324_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-206&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0206_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-256New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0256_EN.html |
events/10/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:347:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:347:SOM:EN:HTML |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
PECH/6/63876New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R1288New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R1288 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0324/COM_COM(2008)0324_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0324/COM_COM(2008)0324_EN.pdf |
activities/9/docs/1/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:347:TOCNew
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:347:SOM:EN:HTML |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|