BETA


2008/0127(COD) Performance and sustainability of the European aviation system

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead TRAN MARINESCU Marian-Jean (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion ITRE RIERA MADURELL Teresa (icon: PSE PSE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 100-p2

Events

2009/11/14
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to establish a harmonised regulatory framework for the creation of the single European sky.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EC) No 549/2004, (EC) No 550/2004, (EC) No 551/2004 and (EC) No 552/2004 in order to improve the performance and sustainability of the European aviation system.

CONTENT: the Council adopted two regulations to improve the performance and safety of the European aviation system. This Regulation t strengthens the Single European Sky legislation while the second extends the tasks of the European Aviation Safety Agency .

Both regulations were adopted following a first-reading agreement reached with the European Parliament in March 2009.

This Regulation on the Single European Sky amends four existing regulations (Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 laying down the framework for the creation of the Single European Sky, Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 on the provision of air navigation services in the Single European Sky, Regulation (EC) No 551/2004 on the organisation and use of the airspace in the Single European Sky, Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 on the interoperability of the European air traffic management network) which were adopted in 2004. Since their adoption it has proved necessary to consolidate and address a number of challenges, relating in particular to:

sustainable development – attenuating the environmental impact of aviation through, for example, the creation of a rational European route network, including shorter routes for intra-Community traffic; performance – the performance of the network in terms of reduction in delays and lower costs for airspace users; governance issues - ensuring that the system is supervised in a transparent and correct manner at national and EU level.

The objective of the single European sky initiative is to enhance current air traffic safety standards, to contribute to the sustainable development of the air transport system and to improve the overall performance of air traffic management (ATM) and air navigation services (ANS) for general air traffic in Europe, with a view to meeting the requirements of all airspace users. This single European sky will comprise a coherent pan-European network of routes, network management and air traffic management systems based only on safety, efficiency and technical considerations, for the benefit of all airspace users. In pursuit of this objective, the Regulation establishes a harmonised regulatory framework for the creation of the single European sky.

The application of the Regulation is without prejudice to Member States’ sovereignty over their airspace and to the requirements of the Member States relating to public order, public security and defence matters and the Regulation does not cover military operations and training. It is also without prejudice to the rights and duties of Member States under the 1944 Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation (the Chicago Convention). In this context, an additional objective of the Regulation is, in the fields it covers, to assist Member States in fulfilling their obligations under the Chicago Convention, by providing a basis for a common interpretation and uniform implementation of its provisions, and by ensuring that these provisions are duly taken into account in this Regulation and in the rules drawn up for its implementation.

The Regulation sets a fixed deadline for the implementation of functional airspace blocks that are a tool for a more rational and efficient European airspace. In addition, it strengthens the central network function at the EU level, as well as the principles concerning the degree of autonomy to be accorded to national supervisory authorities responsible for overseeing the provision of aeronautical services in Member States.

Functional airspace blocks : the functional airspace blocks are key enablers for enhancing cooperation between air navigation service providers in order to improve performance and create synergies. The Regulation provides that by 4 December 2012 , Member States must take the necessary measures in order to ensure the implementation of functional airspace blocks with a view to achieving the required capacity and efficiency of the air traffic management network within the single European sky and maintaining a high level of safety and contributing to the overall performance of the air transport system and a reduced environmental impact. Member States shall cooperate to the fullest extent possible with each other, in particular Member States establishing neighbouring functional airspace blocks, in order to ensure compliance with this provision. Where relevant, cooperation may also include third countries taking part in functional airspace blocks.

Functional airspace blocks system coordinator : in order to facilitate the establishment of the functional airspace blocks, the Commission may designate a natural person as functional airspace blocks system coordinator (the Coordinator), who will facilitate at the request of all Member States concerned and, where appropriate, third countries taking part in the same functional airspace block, overcoming of difficulties in their negotiation process in order to speed up the establishment of functional airspace blocks. The Coordinator shall act impartially in particular with regard to Member States, third countries, the Commission and the stakeholders.

Performance scheme : to drive improved performance of ATM and air navigation services (ANS), the Regulation establishes a framework for the definition, implementation and enforcement of binding performance targets in key performance areas in line with the policies of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO). An indispensable feature of such a framework is an appropriate mechanism for reporting, examining, evaluating and disseminating performance data of ATM and ANS along with a relevant incentive scheme to encourage achievement of the targets.

SEFIR: in view of the creation of functional airspace blocks and the setting up of the performance scheme, the Commission should determine and take into account the necessary conditions for the Community to create a Single European Flight Information Region (SEFIR), to be requested by the Member States from the ICAO in accordance with both the established procedures of that organisation and the rights, obligations and responsibilities of Member States under the Chicago Convention. By encompassing the airspace under the responsibility of the Member States, the SEFIR should facilitate common planning and integrated operations in order to overcome regional bottlenecks. Such a SEFIR should include the necessary flexibility to reflect specific needs such as traffic density and the level of complexity required.

National supervisory authorities : national supervisory authorities have a key role to play in the implementation of the single European sky and the Commission should therefore facilitate cooperation among them in order to enable the exchange of best practices and to develop a common approach, including through enhanced cooperation at regional level. This cooperation should take place on a regular basis. The national supervisory authorities shall be independent of air navigation service providers. This independence shall be achieved through adequate separation, at the functional level at least, between the national supervisory authorities and such providers.

Common projects : common projects may assist the successful implementation of the air traffic management (ATM) Master Plan. Such projects shall support the objectives of this Regulation to improve the performance of the European aviation system in key areas such as capacity, flight and cost efficiency as well as environmental sustainability, within the overriding safety objectives.

The Commission may also decide to set up common projects for network-related functions which are of particular importance for the improvement of the overall performance of air traffic management and air navigation services in Europe.

Consultation of stakeholders : the Member States, acting in accordance with their national legislation, shall establish consultation mechanisms for appropriate involvement of stakeholders, including professional staff representative bodies, in the implementation of the single European sky. The Commission shall establish a consultation mechanism at Community level. The text includes a list of interested parties.

Report : the Commission shall periodically review the application of this Regulation report to the European Parliament and to the Council by 4 June 2011, and at the end of each reference period.

Review : the Commission shall submit a study no later than 4 December 2012 evaluating the legal, safety, industrial, economic and social impacts of the application of market principles to the provision of communication, navigation, surveillance and aeronautical information services, compared to existing oralternative organisational principles and taking into account developments in the functional airspace blocks and in available technology.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 04/12/2009. Article 6(2) and (6) of Regulation (EC) No 551/2004 (Network management and design), as amended by this Regulation, shall apply from the date specified in their respective implementing rules but no later than 4 December 2012.

2009/10/21
   CSL - Draft final act
Documents
2009/10/21
   CSL - Final act signed
2009/10/21
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2009/09/07
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
2009/09/07
   CSL - Council Meeting
2009/06/04
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2009/03/30
   CSL - Council Meeting
2009/03/25
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2009/03/25
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 614 votes to 47, with 24 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending, under the first reading of the codecision procedure, the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EC) No 549/2004, (EC) No 550/2004, (EC) No 551/2004 and (EC) No 552/2004 in order to improve the performance and sustainability of the European aviation system.

The amendments were the result of a compromise negotiated with the Council. The main amendments were as follows:

Application: the application of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 shall be without prejudice to the rights and duties of Member States under the 1944 Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation. In this context, an additional objective of this Regulation is, in the fields it covers, to assist Member States in fulfilling their obligations under the Chicago Convention, by providing a basis for a common interpretation and uniform implementation of its provisions, and by ensuring that these provisions are duly taken into account in this Regulation and in the rules drawn up for its implementation. There is an additional provision with regard to the application to the airport of Gibraltar.

Definitions: new definitions are inserted for, inter alia, "certificate", "flight information service" "alerting services” and "cross-border services".

Independence : the national supervisory authorities shall be independent of air navigation service providers. This independence shall be achieved through adequate separation, at the functional level at least, between the national supervisory authorities and such providers. National supervisory authorities shall exercise their powers impartially, independently and transparently. This shall be achieved by applying appropriate management and control mechanisms, including within the administration of a Member State. However, this shall not prevent the national supervisory authorities from exercising their tasks within the rules of organisation of national civil aviation authorities or any other public bodies.

Relations with European third countries : the Community and its Member States shall aim at and support the extension of the SES to countries which are not members of the EU. To that end, they shall endeavour, either in the framework of agreements concluded with neighbouring third countries or in the context of agreements on functional airspace blocks, to extend the application of this Regulation to those countries.

Implementing rules : for the development of implementing rules the Commission may issue mandates to Eurocontrol or to another body, setting out the tasks to be performed and the timetable for this and taking into account the relevant deadlines laid down in this Regulation.

There is a provision on penalties for infringements of the Regulation in particular by airspace users and service providers.

Stakeholder consultations : Member States shall establish consultation mechanisms for appropriate involvement of stakeholders, including professional staff representative bodies, in the implementation of the single European sky. The text sets out an open list of stakeholders.

Improved performance system : a performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions shall be set up and include: a) Community-wide performance targets on the key performance areas of safety, environment, capacity and cost-efficiency; (b) national plans, or plans for functional airspace blocks, including performance targets, ensuring consistency with the Community-wide performance targets; and c) periodic review, monitoring and benchmarking of performance of air navigation services and network functions. The text sets out the procedures that will apply to the performance scheme, as well as the reference periods . For the detailed functioning of the performance scheme, the Commission must adopt implementing rules which must cover certain specified factors.

Report : the Commission shall first report to the European Parliament and to the Council 18 months after the entry into force of this Regulation, and at the end of each reference period thereafter.

European Aviation Safety Agency : when implementing this Regulation and Regulations (EC) No 550/2004, (EC) No 551/2004 and (EC) No 552/2004, Member States and the Commission, in accordance with their respective roles, shall coordinate as appropriate with the EASA to ensure that all safety aspects are properly addressed.

Air navigation service providers : the compromise text adds additional provisions to Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 with regard to the duties of national supervisory authorities.

An additional Article is inserted on qualified entities.

Functional airspace blocks (FABs): Member States shall take all necessary measures in order to ensure the implementation of functional airspace blocks no later than 3 years following the entry into force of this Regulation. FABs must also ensure consistency with the European route network and facilitate consistency with Community-wide performance targets. The text adds provisions regarding the Commission’s assessment of the fulfilment of requirements for FABs.

Coordinator: in order to facilitate the establishment of the functional airspace blocks, the Commission may designate a natural person as Functional Airspace Blocks System Coordinator ("the Coordinator"). The Coordinator shall facilitate at the request of all Member States concerned and, where appropriate, third countries taking part in the same FAB, overcoming of difficulties in their negotiation process in order to speed up the establishment of functional airspace blocks. He will act on the basis of a mandate from all Member States concerned and, where appropriate, third countries taking part in the same FAB. He shall act impartially in particular vis-à-vis Member States, third countries, the Commission and the stakeholders.

The Coordinator will report to the Commission, to the Single Sky Committee and to the European Parliament every 3 months after his/her designation. The remit of the Coordinator shall expire when the last FAB agreement is signed but no later than three years following the entry into force of this Regulation.

The text also deals with relations with military authorities

Costs: a provision on determined costs is inserted and the text states that in respect of the functional airspace blocks and as part of their respective framework agreements, Member States shall make reasonable efforts to agree on common principles for charging policy;"

Common projects : common projects may assist the successful implementation of the ATM Master Plan. Such projects shall, furthermore, support the objectives of the Regulation to improve the performance of the European aviation system in key areas such as capacity, flight and cost efficiency as well as environmental sustainability, within the overriding safety objectives. The Commission may develop guidance material concerning the way in which such projects can support the implementation of the ATM Master Plan. Such guidance material shall not prejudice mechanisms for the deployment of such projects in relation with a functional airspace block as agreed upon by the partners of those blocks. The Commission may also decide to set up common projects for network-related functions , which are of particular importance for the improvement of the overall performance of air traffic management and air navigation services in Europe. Such common projects may be considered eligible for funding support via European funds within the multiannual financial framework. To this end, and without prejudice to Member States" competence to decide on the use of their financial resources, the Commission shall carry out an independent cost-benefit analysis and appropriate consultations with Member States and with relevant stakeholders, exploring all appropriate means for financing the deployment thereof. The eligible costs of deployment of common projects shall be recovered in accordance with the principles of transparency and non-discrimination.

Network management function : the agreement laid down certain principles that the Commission should observe when establishing the network management function.

Documents
2009/03/24
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2009/01/20
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2009/01/20
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Documents
2009/01/14
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Documents
2008/12/08
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
Details

The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report drawn up by Marian-Jean MARINESCU (ALDE, UK) amending, under the first reading of the codecision procedure, the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EC) No 549/2004, (EC) No 550/2004, (EC) No 551/2004 and (EC) No 552/2004 in order to improve the performance and sustainability of the European aviation system. The committee pointed out that the most effective and most efficient way of creating a single European sky is by means of a top-down approach. However, as it has never been possible to secure political approval for such an approach, the aim must now be to speed up the processes initiated on the basis of the bottom-up approach.

The main amendments are as follows:

Eurocontrol: a new recital states that the planned reform of Eurocontrol should take place before the entry into force of this Regulation. It should be conducted in a way which should ensure that the European tasks entrusted to Eurocontrol under the SES Regulations are compatible with and do not contradict other aspects of its work related to its tasks and competences as an international organisation.

Implementation: Members stipulate that the implementation of this regulatory framework shall be scheduled in full accordance with the development of the SESAR project with a view to creating the SES before the start of the third phase of SESAR, the deployment phase. The committee notes that the deployment of SESAR from 2014 onwards should be made directly on the Single Sky basis, rather than on a functional airspace blocks basis, to avoid unnecessary duplication of costs. In this respect, efforts should be made to create the Single Sky in alignment with the development phase of SESAR.

Definitions: new definitions are inserted for inter alia “right of transit”, and “Single European Sky”, and “functional independence.”

Independence : national supervisory authorities must exercise their powers independently as well as transparently. This independence shall be achieved by implementing appropriate management and control mechanisms.

Extension of SES : the Community shall aim at and support the extension of the SES to countries which are not members of the EU. To that end, it shall endeavour, either within the framework of agreements concluded with neighbouring third countries, within the context of Eurocontrol, or within functional airspace blocks (FAB) agreements, to extend the scope of this Regulation to those countries.

Stakeholder consultations : Members stressed the need for proper consultation among stakeholders, and underline the role of the Industry Consultation Body and of Sectoral Dialogue. They clarify that implementing rules might be prepared by different organisations.

Improved performance system : a performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions shall be set up and include: a) Community-wide performance targets on appropriate key performance areas including safety, environment, capacity and cost-efficiency; (b) national or regional performance plans, including performance targets, ensuring consistency with the Community-wide performance targets; and c) periodic review, monitoring and benchmarking of performance of air navigation services and network functions. The Community-wide performance targets for ANSPs and network functions shall be adopted by the Commission, after taking into account the relevant inputs from NSAs at national or regional level. The national or regional plans shall be drawn up by NSAs.These plans shall include binding national or regional targets and an appropriate incentive scheme as adopted by the Member State(s).

The committee sets out the procedures that will apply to the performance scheme. For the detailed functioning of the performance scheme, the Commission must adopt implementing rules which must cover certain specified factors.

Report: the Commission shall first report to the European Parliament and to the Council 18 months after the entry into force of this Regulation, and every year thereafter.

Inspections: national supervisory authority shall organise proper inspections and surveys, including checks on the requisite staffing levels, to verify compliance with the requirements of the Regulation.

Certificates: National supervisory authorities shall issue certificates to air navigation service providers where they comply with the common requirements referred to in the text. Certificates shall be issued individually for each type of air navigation service even in the case of a bundle of such services, where a provider of air traffic services, whatever its legal status, operates its own communication, navigation and surveillance systems. The certificates shall be checked on a regular basis.

FABs : the Commission and Member States must ensure the implementation of functional airspace blocks at the latest by the end of 2011 (rather than 2012).

Coordinator: in order to facilitate the accomplishment of the SES through FABs, the Commission shall appoint a senior political figure as Functional Airspace Blocks System Coordinator (the Coordinator). The Coordinator shall be appointed by the Commission in agreement with the Member States, and after having consulted the European Parliament. The main role of the Coordinator shall be to facilitate high-level agreements, and to find the best solutions for overcoming difficulties in order to speed up the establishment of FABs, the coordination between FABs, and to ensure proper harmonisation and consistency of the FABs with the provisions of the Regulation. He shall report directly to the Commission and will work in close cooperation with the Single Sky Committee, Eurocontrol, the Performance Review Body and the EASA.

Renewal of civil military agreements: Member States shall, within the context of the common transport policy, take the necessary steps to ensure that written agreements between the competent civil and military authorities or equivalent legal arrangements are established or renewed in respect of the management of specific airspace blocks.

Costs: in respect of the FABs, Member States shall agree, through the framework agreement, on a convergence scheme towards reaching a single charge which is in accordance with the performance scheme. Charges shall be set, in accordance with the performance targets as well as aspects contributing to the cost structure of the service provided.

The committee noted that the imposition of financial incentives to deliver improved performance should not be directed at airspace users. The objectives of delivering improved performance in the context of the Single European Sky should be targeted towards monopoly service providers. Consequently, financial advantages and penalties should be used to incentivise service providers to meet performance targets.

Common projects : common projects shall be designed to assist airspace users and/or air navigation service providers in order to improve collective air navigation infrastructure, the provision of air navigation services and the use of airspace, in particular those projects that may be required for the establishment of FABs and for the implementation of the ATM Master Plan. The Commission shall propose financial resources including Trans European Network funding, European Investment Bank grants, and auctioning revenues from the integration of aviation in the Emission Trading Scheme with a view to financing common projects, especially for speeding up the implementation of SESAR, within the multiannual financial framework. The Commission may also decide that the costs of common projects may be recovered partly through charges. Such decisions shall identify the common project and specify in particular the timetable for implementation, the cost to be charged to airspace users and its allocation amongst Member States, avoiding duplication in costs and charges. Before taking a decision, the Commission shall carry out an independent cost-benefit analysis and substantive consultation aiming, to the greatest extent possible, at reaching agreement with service providers and airspace users.

Application of market principles : market principles must apply to the provision and designation of services in the fields of communication, navigation, surveillance, meteorology and aeronautical information no later than by the end of 2010.

The Commission must submit a recommendation on European Flight Information Region by 31 December 2012.

Network management function : the committee laid down certain principles that the Commission should observe when establishing the network management function.

2008/12/08
   CSL - Council Meeting
2008/12/03
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/11/19
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/10/15
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/08/25
   EP - RIERA MADURELL Teresa (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2008/07/15
   EP - MARINESCU Marian-Jean (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2008/07/08
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2008/06/25
   EC - Legislative proposal
Details

PURPOSE: to revise the single European sky legislation in order to improve the performance and sustainability of the European aviation system.

BACKGROUND: the European Commission adopted the second package of legislation for a Single European Sky (SES II). The proposals included in the package aim to improve the performance of the European aviation system in key areas such as safety, capacity, flight and cost efficiency and environment within the overriding safety objectives (see COD/2008/0128 ).

The SES II package is based on four pillars: updates to existing legislation from 2004; the SESAR (Single European Sky Air Traffic Management Research) Master Plan or 'technological pillar'; the 'safety pillar' and an airport capacity action plan.

CONTENT: this proposal introduces several enhancements to the original SES legislation, including binding performance targets for air navigation service providers, a European network management function to ensure convergence between national networks and a definitive date for Member States to improve performance, initially through a cross border cooperative approach known as Functional Airspace Blocks.

The main elements of the proposal are as follows:

Designation and independence of national supervisory authorities : Member States shall, jointly or individually, nominate or establish a body or bodies as their national supervisory authority in order to assume the tasks assigned to such authority under the Regulation. The national supervisory authorities must: (i) be at least functionally independent from any other public or private entity; (ii) exercise their powers impartially and transparently; (iii) have adequate human and financial resources to carry out their duties.

Industry Consultation Body : the Commission shall establish an 'industry consultation body', to which air navigation service providers, associations of airspace users, airports, the manufacturing industry and professional staff representative bodies shall belong. The role of this body shall be to advise the Commission on the implementation of the single European sky.

Social partners : social partners should be better informed and consulted on all measures having significant social implications. The Sectoral Dialogue Committee set up under Commission Decision 98/500/EC on the establishment of Sectoral Dialogue Committees promoting the Dialogue between the social partners at European level should also be consulted.

Improved performance system : to drive improved performance of air traffic management (ATM) and air navigation services (ANS), the proposal establishes a framework for the definition, implementation and enforcement of binding performance targets in key performance areas in line with International Civil Aviation Organisation's (ICAO) policies. This framework provides an appropriate mechanism for reporting, examining, evaluating and disseminating performance data of ATM and ANS along with relevant incentives and disincentives to encourage achievement of the targets.

Safety requirements : the Commission shall adopt implementing rules incorporating the relevant provisions of the Eurocontrol safety regulatory requirements (ESARRs) and subsequent amendments to those requirements falling within the scope of this Regulation. It is specified that a Member State shall not refuse to designate an air traffic service provider on the grounds that it is established in another Member State or that it belongs to nationals of that Member State.

Functional Airspace Blocks : Member States shall take all necessary measures in order to ensure the establishment of functional airspace blocks as soon as possible and at the latest by the end of 2012 with a view to achieving maximum capacity and efficiency of the air traffic management network within the single European sky and maintaining a high level of safety and contributing to the overall performance of the air transport system and a reduced environmental impact. Member States shall cooperate with each other to the fullest extent possible in order to ensure compliance with this provision.

Charging scheme for air navigation services : this shall contribute to greater transparency in the determination, imposition and enforcement of charges to airspace users and shall contribute to the cost efficiency of providing air navigation services and to efficiency of flights, while maintaining an optimum safety level. This scheme shall also be consistent with the 1944 Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation and with Eurocontrol's charging system for en-route charges.

Single European Flight Information Region (EFIR) : an EFIR encompassing the airspace falling under the responsibility of the Member States should facilitate common planning and integrated operations in order to overcome regional bottlenecks. The Community and the Member States shall request ICAO to establish and recognise a single European Flight Information Region (EFIR). To this end, for matters which fall within the competence of the Community, the Commission shall, if necessary, submit a recommendation to the Council.

Aeronautical information : without prejudice to the publication by Member States of aeronautical information, the Commission, working in cooperation with Eurocontrol, shall ensure the availability of electronic aeronautical information of high quality, presented in a harmonised way and serving the requirements of all relevant users in terms of data quality and timeliness.

Rules of the air and airspace classifications : the Commission shall adopt implementing rules in order to: (i) incorporate the appropriate provisions of ICAO standards and recommended practices on rules of the air, where necessary with appropriate adaptations and improvements; (ii) harmonise the application of the ICAO airspace classification, where necessary with appropriate adaptations and improvements, in order to ensure the seamless provision of air navigation services within the single European sky.

Network management and design : the air traffic management (ATM) network shall allow optimum use of airspace and ensure that airspace users can operate preferred trajectories, while allowing maximum access to airspace and air navigation services. In order to achieve these objectives, the Commission shall ensure that the following functions are carried out: (i) design of the European route network; (ii) coordination and allocation of scarce resources, in particular radio frequencies and radar transponder codes; (iii) additional functions for the ATM network, as defined in the ATM Master Plan.

Comitology : power should be conferred on the Commission to update measures due to technical or operational developments as well as to lay down the basic criteria and procedures for the exercise of certain management network functions. These measures must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.

2008/06/25
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2008/06/25
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2008/06/24
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to revise the single European sky legislation in order to improve the performance and sustainability of the European aviation system.

BACKGROUND: the European Commission adopted the second package of legislation for a Single European Sky (SES II). The proposals included in the package aim to improve the performance of the European aviation system in key areas such as safety, capacity, flight and cost efficiency and environment within the overriding safety objectives (see COD/2008/0128 ).

The SES II package is based on four pillars: updates to existing legislation from 2004; the SESAR (Single European Sky Air Traffic Management Research) Master Plan or 'technological pillar'; the 'safety pillar' and an airport capacity action plan.

CONTENT: this proposal introduces several enhancements to the original SES legislation, including binding performance targets for air navigation service providers, a European network management function to ensure convergence between national networks and a definitive date for Member States to improve performance, initially through a cross border cooperative approach known as Functional Airspace Blocks.

The main elements of the proposal are as follows:

Designation and independence of national supervisory authorities : Member States shall, jointly or individually, nominate or establish a body or bodies as their national supervisory authority in order to assume the tasks assigned to such authority under the Regulation. The national supervisory authorities must: (i) be at least functionally independent from any other public or private entity; (ii) exercise their powers impartially and transparently; (iii) have adequate human and financial resources to carry out their duties.

Industry Consultation Body : the Commission shall establish an 'industry consultation body', to which air navigation service providers, associations of airspace users, airports, the manufacturing industry and professional staff representative bodies shall belong. The role of this body shall be to advise the Commission on the implementation of the single European sky.

Social partners : social partners should be better informed and consulted on all measures having significant social implications. The Sectoral Dialogue Committee set up under Commission Decision 98/500/EC on the establishment of Sectoral Dialogue Committees promoting the Dialogue between the social partners at European level should also be consulted.

Improved performance system : to drive improved performance of air traffic management (ATM) and air navigation services (ANS), the proposal establishes a framework for the definition, implementation and enforcement of binding performance targets in key performance areas in line with International Civil Aviation Organisation's (ICAO) policies. This framework provides an appropriate mechanism for reporting, examining, evaluating and disseminating performance data of ATM and ANS along with relevant incentives and disincentives to encourage achievement of the targets.

Safety requirements : the Commission shall adopt implementing rules incorporating the relevant provisions of the Eurocontrol safety regulatory requirements (ESARRs) and subsequent amendments to those requirements falling within the scope of this Regulation. It is specified that a Member State shall not refuse to designate an air traffic service provider on the grounds that it is established in another Member State or that it belongs to nationals of that Member State.

Functional Airspace Blocks : Member States shall take all necessary measures in order to ensure the establishment of functional airspace blocks as soon as possible and at the latest by the end of 2012 with a view to achieving maximum capacity and efficiency of the air traffic management network within the single European sky and maintaining a high level of safety and contributing to the overall performance of the air transport system and a reduced environmental impact. Member States shall cooperate with each other to the fullest extent possible in order to ensure compliance with this provision.

Charging scheme for air navigation services : this shall contribute to greater transparency in the determination, imposition and enforcement of charges to airspace users and shall contribute to the cost efficiency of providing air navigation services and to efficiency of flights, while maintaining an optimum safety level. This scheme shall also be consistent with the 1944 Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation and with Eurocontrol's charging system for en-route charges.

Single European Flight Information Region (EFIR) : an EFIR encompassing the airspace falling under the responsibility of the Member States should facilitate common planning and integrated operations in order to overcome regional bottlenecks. The Community and the Member States shall request ICAO to establish and recognise a single European Flight Information Region (EFIR). To this end, for matters which fall within the competence of the Community, the Commission shall, if necessary, submit a recommendation to the Council.

Aeronautical information : without prejudice to the publication by Member States of aeronautical information, the Commission, working in cooperation with Eurocontrol, shall ensure the availability of electronic aeronautical information of high quality, presented in a harmonised way and serving the requirements of all relevant users in terms of data quality and timeliness.

Rules of the air and airspace classifications : the Commission shall adopt implementing rules in order to: (i) incorporate the appropriate provisions of ICAO standards and recommended practices on rules of the air, where necessary with appropriate adaptations and improvements; (ii) harmonise the application of the ICAO airspace classification, where necessary with appropriate adaptations and improvements, in order to ensure the seamless provision of air navigation services within the single European sky.

Network management and design : the air traffic management (ATM) network shall allow optimum use of airspace and ensure that airspace users can operate preferred trajectories, while allowing maximum access to airspace and air navigation services. In order to achieve these objectives, the Commission shall ensure that the following functions are carried out: (i) design of the European route network; (ii) coordination and allocation of scarce resources, in particular radio frequencies and radar transponder codes; (iii) additional functions for the ATM network, as defined in the ATM Master Plan.

Comitology : power should be conferred on the Commission to update measures due to technical or operational developments as well as to lay down the basic criteria and procedures for the exercise of certain management network functions. These measures must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.

Documents

Votes

Rapport MARINESCU A6-0002/2009 - am 166 #

2009/03/25 Outcome: -: 624, +: 61, 0: 3
CY ?? EE MT LU IE LV SI CZ DK SE EL BG FI LT AT SK PT NL BE HU RO FR PL ES IT GB DE
Total
2
1
5
4
5
11
7
7
22
14
16
21
17
14
12
15
14
22
25
22
22
29
63
47
45
67
73
86
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
29

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovakia NI

3

Belgium NI

2

Poland NI

1

Italy NI

For (1)

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

3
icon: UEN UEN
37

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: ALDE ALDE
84

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
2
icon: PSE PSE
190

Estonia PSE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
252

PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport MARINESCU A6-0002/2009 - am 167 #

2009/03/25 Outcome: -: 620, +: 52, 0: 15
CY ?? MT LU EE IE LV SI DK SE EL CZ BG FI LT AT SK PT NL BE HU RO IT FR PL ES GB DE
Total
2
1
4
4
5
11
7
7
14
16
21
23
17
14
12
15
14
21
25
22
21
29
65
63
47
47
73
87
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

3
icon: NI NI
27

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovakia NI

3

Belgium NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

3

Poland NI

1
icon: UEN UEN
37

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: ALDE ALDE
84

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
2
icon: PSE PSE
191

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
251

PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport MARINESCU A6-0002/2009 - am 169 #

2009/03/25 Outcome: -: 632, +: 52, 0: 8
CY ?? MT LU EE IE SI LV CZ DK SE EL BG FI LT AT SK PT NL BE HU RO PL ES FR IT GB DE
Total
2
1
4
4
5
11
7
8
23
14
16
21
17
14
12
15
14
22
25
22
22
29
47
47
65
65
73
87
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
29

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Austria NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovakia NI

3

Belgium NI

2

Poland NI

1

Italy NI

For (1)

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

3

France IND/DEM

2
icon: UEN UEN
38

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: ALDE ALDE
84

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
2
icon: PSE PSE
195

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
252

PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport MARINESCU A6-0002/2009 - am 170 #

2009/03/25 Outcome: -: 645, +: 46, 0: 3
CY ?? MT EE LU IE SI LV DK SE EL CZ BG FI LT SK AT PT BE NL HU RO PL ES IT FR GB DE
Total
2
1
4
5
5
11
7
8
14
16
21
23
17
14
12
14
15
22
22
25
22
29
46
47
66
66
73
87
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

3

France IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
29

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

3

Austria NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Poland NI

1
3
icon: UEN UEN
38

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: ALDE ALDE
84

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
2
icon: PSE PSE
195

Malta PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
251

PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport MARINESCU A6-0002/2009 - am 171 #

2009/03/25 Outcome: -: 625, +: 50, 0: 16
CY ?? MT EE LU SI IE LV EL DK CZ SE BG SK FI LT AT PT NL BE HU RO PL ES FR IT GB DE
Total
2
1
4
5
5
7
11
8
21
14
23
15
17
14
14
12
15
22
24
22
22
29
46
46
65
67
73
87
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

3

France IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
29

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

2

Poland NI

1

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

3
icon: UEN UEN
38

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

5
icon: ALDE ALDE
84

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
2
icon: PSE PSE
193

Malta PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Finland PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
251

PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport MARINESCU A6-0002/2009 - am 175 #

2009/03/25 Outcome: -: 646, +: 39, 0: 10
CY ?? MT EE LU IE SI LV EL CZ DK BG FI LT SE SK AT PT NL BE HU RO PL ES IT FR GB DE
Total
2
1
4
5
5
11
7
8
21
23
14
17
14
12
16
14
15
22
25
22
22
29
46
47
67
65
73
88
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

3

France IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
29

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

3

Austria NI

2

Belgium NI

2

Poland NI

1
3
icon: UEN UEN
37

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: ALDE ALDE
84

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
2
icon: PSE PSE
194

Malta PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
254

PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport MARINESCU A6-0002/2009 - ams 177+179 #

2009/03/25 Outcome: -: 643, +: 40, 0: 7
CY ?? MT EE LU IE SI LV SE EL CZ DK FI LT SK BG AT PT NL BE HU RO PL ES IT FR GB DE
Total
2
1
3
5
5
11
7
8
16
21
23
14
14
12
12
16
15
20
25
21
22
29
47
47
67
66
73
88
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
21

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

3

France IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
27

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Against (2)

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Austria NI

2

Belgium NI

2

Poland NI

1
3
icon: UEN UEN
38

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: ALDE ALDE
84

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
2
icon: PSE PSE
193

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
253

PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport MARINESCU A6-0002/2009 - résolution législative #

2009/03/25 Outcome: +: 614, -: 47, 0: 24
DE FR IT GB ES PL RO BE HU NL PT BG FI AT SE LT DK SK CZ EL IE SI LV EE LU MT ?? CY
Total
88
65
64
73
44
47
29
22
22
25
22
17
14
15
16
12
14
12
22
20
11
7
8
5
5
3
1
2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
253
2

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
190

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
84
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

5

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
37

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
28

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

7

Poland NI

1

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

2

Czechia NI

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
20

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
121 2008/0127(COD)
2008/10/27 ITRE 12 amendments...
source: PE-414.976
2008/11/19 TRAN 109 amendments...
source: PE-415.123

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2008-06-25T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/0
date
2008-06-25T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/1
date
2008-06-25T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2093/COM_SEC(2008)2093_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2093/COM_SEC(2008)2093_EN.pdf
docs/4
date
2008-12-03T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE413.996&secondRef=02 title: PE413.996
committee
ITRE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/5
date
2008-12-03T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE413.996&secondRef=02 title: PE413.996
committee
ITRE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE413.996&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-413996_EN.html
events/0/date
Old
2008-06-25T00:00:00
New
2008-06-24T00:00:00
links/National parliaments/url
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2008&number=0127&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2008&number=0127&appLng=EN
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2093/COM_SEC(2008)2093_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2093/COM_SEC(2008)2093_EN.pdf
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2094/COM_SEC(2008)2094_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2094/COM_SEC(2008)2094_EN.pdf
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.349
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE412.349
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.123
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE415.123
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE413.996&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE413.996&secondRef=02
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0044)(documentyear:2009)(documentlanguage:EN)
New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0044)(documentyear:2009)(documentlanguage:EN)
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0002_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0002_EN.html
docs/7/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16644&j=0&l=en
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/3
date
2009-01-20T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0002_EN.html title: A6-0002/2009
events/3
date
2009-01-20T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0002_EN.html title: A6-0002/2009
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090324&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090324&type=CRE
events/6
date
2009-03-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0169_EN.html title: T6-0169/2009
summary
events/6
date
2009-03-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0169_EN.html title: T6-0169/2009
summary
events/10/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:300:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:300:TOC
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
rapporteur
name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2008-07-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: RIERA MADURELL Teresa date: 2008-08-25T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2008-08-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: RIERA MADURELL Teresa group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2093/COM_SEC(2008)2093_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2093/COM_SEC(2008)2093_EN.pdf
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2094/COM_SEC(2008)2094_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2094/COM_SEC(2008)2094_EN.pdf
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-2&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0002_EN.html
docs/7/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-2&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0002_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-169
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0169_EN.html
events/10/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:300:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:300:SOM:EN:HTML
activities
  • date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0388/COM_COM(2008)0388_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0388 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52008PC0388:EN body: EC commission: DG: Energy and Transport Commissioner: TAJANI Antonio type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2008-07-08T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2008-08-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: RIERA MADURELL Teresa body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean
  • date: 2008-12-08T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2913
  • date: 2008-12-08T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2008-08-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: RIERA MADURELL Teresa body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-01-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-2&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0002/2009 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2008-08-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: RIERA MADURELL Teresa body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-03-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090324&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16644&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-169 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0169/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-30T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2935
  • date: 2009-09-07T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 2959
  • date: 2009-09-07T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
  • date: 2009-10-21T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2009-10-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2009-11-14T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R1070 title: Regulation 2009/1070 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:300:TOC title: OJ L 300 14.11.2009, p. 0034
commission
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2008-07-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ITRE
date
2008-08-25T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
rapporteur
group: PSE name: RIERA MADURELL Teresa
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2008-08-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: RIERA MADURELL Teresa group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
TRAN
date
2008-07-15T00:00:00
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 2959 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2959*&MEET_DATE=07/09/2009 date: 2009-09-07T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2935 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2935*&MEET_DATE=30/03/2009 date: 2009-03-30T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2913 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2913*&MEET_DATE=08/12/2008 date: 2008-12-08T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2093/COM_SEC(2008)2093_EN.pdf title: SEC(2008)2093 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=2093 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2094/COM_SEC(2008)2094_EN.pdf title: SEC(2008)2094 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=2094 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2008-10-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE412.349 title: PE412.349 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-11-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE415.123 title: PE415.123 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE413.996&secondRef=02 title: PE413.996 committee: ITRE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2009-01-14T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0044)(documentyear:2009)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES0044/2009 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
  • date: 2009-01-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-2&language=EN title: A6-0002/2009 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-06-04T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=16644&j=0&l=en title: SP(2009)3060 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2009-10-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=[%n4]%2F09&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 03640/2009/LEX type: Draft final act body: CSL
events
  • date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0388/COM_COM(2008)0388_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0388 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=388 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to revise the single European sky legislation in order to improve the performance and sustainability of the European aviation system. BACKGROUND: the European Commission adopted the second package of legislation for a Single European Sky (SES II). The proposals included in the package aim to improve the performance of the European aviation system in key areas such as safety, capacity, flight and cost efficiency and environment within the overriding safety objectives (see COD/2008/0128 ). The SES II package is based on four pillars: updates to existing legislation from 2004; the SESAR (Single European Sky Air Traffic Management Research) Master Plan or 'technological pillar'; the 'safety pillar' and an airport capacity action plan. CONTENT: this proposal introduces several enhancements to the original SES legislation, including binding performance targets for air navigation service providers, a European network management function to ensure convergence between national networks and a definitive date for Member States to improve performance, initially through a cross border cooperative approach known as Functional Airspace Blocks. The main elements of the proposal are as follows: Designation and independence of national supervisory authorities : Member States shall, jointly or individually, nominate or establish a body or bodies as their national supervisory authority in order to assume the tasks assigned to such authority under the Regulation. The national supervisory authorities must: (i) be at least functionally independent from any other public or private entity; (ii) exercise their powers impartially and transparently; (iii) have adequate human and financial resources to carry out their duties. Industry Consultation Body : the Commission shall establish an 'industry consultation body', to which air navigation service providers, associations of airspace users, airports, the manufacturing industry and professional staff representative bodies shall belong. The role of this body shall be to advise the Commission on the implementation of the single European sky. Social partners : social partners should be better informed and consulted on all measures having significant social implications. The Sectoral Dialogue Committee set up under Commission Decision 98/500/EC on the establishment of Sectoral Dialogue Committees promoting the Dialogue between the social partners at European level should also be consulted. Improved performance system : to drive improved performance of air traffic management (ATM) and air navigation services (ANS), the proposal establishes a framework for the definition, implementation and enforcement of binding performance targets in key performance areas in line with International Civil Aviation Organisation's (ICAO) policies. This framework provides an appropriate mechanism for reporting, examining, evaluating and disseminating performance data of ATM and ANS along with relevant incentives and disincentives to encourage achievement of the targets. Safety requirements : the Commission shall adopt implementing rules incorporating the relevant provisions of the Eurocontrol safety regulatory requirements (ESARRs) and subsequent amendments to those requirements falling within the scope of this Regulation. It is specified that a Member State shall not refuse to designate an air traffic service provider on the grounds that it is established in another Member State or that it belongs to nationals of that Member State. Functional Airspace Blocks : Member States shall take all necessary measures in order to ensure the establishment of functional airspace blocks as soon as possible and at the latest by the end of 2012 with a view to achieving maximum capacity and efficiency of the air traffic management network within the single European sky and maintaining a high level of safety and contributing to the overall performance of the air transport system and a reduced environmental impact. Member States shall cooperate with each other to the fullest extent possible in order to ensure compliance with this provision. Charging scheme for air navigation services : this shall contribute to greater transparency in the determination, imposition and enforcement of charges to airspace users and shall contribute to the cost efficiency of providing air navigation services and to efficiency of flights, while maintaining an optimum safety level. This scheme shall also be consistent with the 1944 Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation and with Eurocontrol's charging system for en-route charges. Single European Flight Information Region (EFIR) : an EFIR encompassing the airspace falling under the responsibility of the Member States should facilitate common planning and integrated operations in order to overcome regional bottlenecks. The Community and the Member States shall request ICAO to establish and recognise a single European Flight Information Region (EFIR). To this end, for matters which fall within the competence of the Community, the Commission shall, if necessary, submit a recommendation to the Council. Aeronautical information : without prejudice to the publication by Member States of aeronautical information, the Commission, working in cooperation with Eurocontrol, shall ensure the availability of electronic aeronautical information of high quality, presented in a harmonised way and serving the requirements of all relevant users in terms of data quality and timeliness. Rules of the air and airspace classifications : the Commission shall adopt implementing rules in order to: (i) incorporate the appropriate provisions of ICAO standards and recommended practices on rules of the air, where necessary with appropriate adaptations and improvements; (ii) harmonise the application of the ICAO airspace classification, where necessary with appropriate adaptations and improvements, in order to ensure the seamless provision of air navigation services within the single European sky. Network management and design : the air traffic management (ATM) network shall allow optimum use of airspace and ensure that airspace users can operate preferred trajectories, while allowing maximum access to airspace and air navigation services. In order to achieve these objectives, the Commission shall ensure that the following functions are carried out: (i) design of the European route network; (ii) coordination and allocation of scarce resources, in particular radio frequencies and radar transponder codes; (iii) additional functions for the ATM network, as defined in the ATM Master Plan. Comitology : power should be conferred on the Commission to update measures due to technical or operational developments as well as to lay down the basic criteria and procedures for the exercise of certain management network functions. These measures must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
  • date: 2008-07-08T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-12-08T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report drawn up by Marian-Jean MARINESCU (ALDE, UK) amending, under the first reading of the codecision procedure, the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EC) No 549/2004, (EC) No 550/2004, (EC) No 551/2004 and (EC) No 552/2004 in order to improve the performance and sustainability of the European aviation system. The committee pointed out that the most effective and most efficient way of creating a single European sky is by means of a top-down approach. However, as it has never been possible to secure political approval for such an approach, the aim must now be to speed up the processes initiated on the basis of the bottom-up approach. The main amendments are as follows: Eurocontrol: a new recital states that the planned reform of Eurocontrol should take place before the entry into force of this Regulation. It should be conducted in a way which should ensure that the European tasks entrusted to Eurocontrol under the SES Regulations are compatible with and do not contradict other aspects of its work related to its tasks and competences as an international organisation. Implementation: Members stipulate that the implementation of this regulatory framework shall be scheduled in full accordance with the development of the SESAR project with a view to creating the SES before the start of the third phase of SESAR, the deployment phase. The committee notes that the deployment of SESAR from 2014 onwards should be made directly on the Single Sky basis, rather than on a functional airspace blocks basis, to avoid unnecessary duplication of costs. In this respect, efforts should be made to create the Single Sky in alignment with the development phase of SESAR. Definitions: new definitions are inserted for inter alia “right of transit”, and “Single European Sky”, and “functional independence.” Independence : national supervisory authorities must exercise their powers independently as well as transparently. This independence shall be achieved by implementing appropriate management and control mechanisms. Extension of SES : the Community shall aim at and support the extension of the SES to countries which are not members of the EU. To that end, it shall endeavour, either within the framework of agreements concluded with neighbouring third countries, within the context of Eurocontrol, or within functional airspace blocks (FAB) agreements, to extend the scope of this Regulation to those countries. Stakeholder consultations : Members stressed the need for proper consultation among stakeholders, and underline the role of the Industry Consultation Body and of Sectoral Dialogue. They clarify that implementing rules might be prepared by different organisations. Improved performance system : a performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions shall be set up and include: a) Community-wide performance targets on appropriate key performance areas including safety, environment, capacity and cost-efficiency; (b) national or regional performance plans, including performance targets, ensuring consistency with the Community-wide performance targets; and c) periodic review, monitoring and benchmarking of performance of air navigation services and network functions. The Community-wide performance targets for ANSPs and network functions shall be adopted by the Commission, after taking into account the relevant inputs from NSAs at national or regional level. The national or regional plans shall be drawn up by NSAs.These plans shall include binding national or regional targets and an appropriate incentive scheme as adopted by the Member State(s). The committee sets out the procedures that will apply to the performance scheme. For the detailed functioning of the performance scheme, the Commission must adopt implementing rules which must cover certain specified factors. Report: the Commission shall first report to the European Parliament and to the Council 18 months after the entry into force of this Regulation, and every year thereafter. Inspections: national supervisory authority shall organise proper inspections and surveys, including checks on the requisite staffing levels, to verify compliance with the requirements of the Regulation. Certificates: National supervisory authorities shall issue certificates to air navigation service providers where they comply with the common requirements referred to in the text. Certificates shall be issued individually for each type of air navigation service even in the case of a bundle of such services, where a provider of air traffic services, whatever its legal status, operates its own communication, navigation and surveillance systems. The certificates shall be checked on a regular basis. FABs : the Commission and Member States must ensure the implementation of functional airspace blocks at the latest by the end of 2011 (rather than 2012). Coordinator: in order to facilitate the accomplishment of the SES through FABs, the Commission shall appoint a senior political figure as Functional Airspace Blocks System Coordinator (the Coordinator). The Coordinator shall be appointed by the Commission in agreement with the Member States, and after having consulted the European Parliament. The main role of the Coordinator shall be to facilitate high-level agreements, and to find the best solutions for overcoming difficulties in order to speed up the establishment of FABs, the coordination between FABs, and to ensure proper harmonisation and consistency of the FABs with the provisions of the Regulation. He shall report directly to the Commission and will work in close cooperation with the Single Sky Committee, Eurocontrol, the Performance Review Body and the EASA. Renewal of civil military agreements: Member States shall, within the context of the common transport policy, take the necessary steps to ensure that written agreements between the competent civil and military authorities or equivalent legal arrangements are established or renewed in respect of the management of specific airspace blocks. Costs: in respect of the FABs, Member States shall agree, through the framework agreement, on a convergence scheme towards reaching a single charge which is in accordance with the performance scheme. Charges shall be set, in accordance with the performance targets as well as aspects contributing to the cost structure of the service provided. The committee noted that the imposition of financial incentives to deliver improved performance should not be directed at airspace users. The objectives of delivering improved performance in the context of the Single European Sky should be targeted towards monopoly service providers. Consequently, financial advantages and penalties should be used to incentivise service providers to meet performance targets. Common projects : common projects shall be designed to assist airspace users and/or air navigation service providers in order to improve collective air navigation infrastructure, the provision of air navigation services and the use of airspace, in particular those projects that may be required for the establishment of FABs and for the implementation of the ATM Master Plan. The Commission shall propose financial resources including Trans European Network funding, European Investment Bank grants, and auctioning revenues from the integration of aviation in the Emission Trading Scheme with a view to financing common projects, especially for speeding up the implementation of SESAR, within the multiannual financial framework. The Commission may also decide that the costs of common projects may be recovered partly through charges. Such decisions shall identify the common project and specify in particular the timetable for implementation, the cost to be charged to airspace users and its allocation amongst Member States, avoiding duplication in costs and charges. Before taking a decision, the Commission shall carry out an independent cost-benefit analysis and substantive consultation aiming, to the greatest extent possible, at reaching agreement with service providers and airspace users. Application of market principles : market principles must apply to the provision and designation of services in the fields of communication, navigation, surveillance, meteorology and aeronautical information no later than by the end of 2010. The Commission must submit a recommendation on European Flight Information Region by 31 December 2012. Network management function : the committee laid down certain principles that the Commission should observe when establishing the network management function.
  • date: 2009-01-20T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-2&language=EN title: A6-0002/2009
  • date: 2009-03-24T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090324&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-25T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16644&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-25T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-169 title: T6-0169/2009 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 614 votes to 47, with 24 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending, under the first reading of the codecision procedure, the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EC) No 549/2004, (EC) No 550/2004, (EC) No 551/2004 and (EC) No 552/2004 in order to improve the performance and sustainability of the European aviation system. The amendments were the result of a compromise negotiated with the Council. The main amendments were as follows: Application: the application of Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 shall be without prejudice to the rights and duties of Member States under the 1944 Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation. In this context, an additional objective of this Regulation is, in the fields it covers, to assist Member States in fulfilling their obligations under the Chicago Convention, by providing a basis for a common interpretation and uniform implementation of its provisions, and by ensuring that these provisions are duly taken into account in this Regulation and in the rules drawn up for its implementation. There is an additional provision with regard to the application to the airport of Gibraltar. Definitions: new definitions are inserted for, inter alia, "certificate", "flight information service" "alerting services” and "cross-border services". Independence : the national supervisory authorities shall be independent of air navigation service providers. This independence shall be achieved through adequate separation, at the functional level at least, between the national supervisory authorities and such providers. National supervisory authorities shall exercise their powers impartially, independently and transparently. This shall be achieved by applying appropriate management and control mechanisms, including within the administration of a Member State. However, this shall not prevent the national supervisory authorities from exercising their tasks within the rules of organisation of national civil aviation authorities or any other public bodies. Relations with European third countries : the Community and its Member States shall aim at and support the extension of the SES to countries which are not members of the EU. To that end, they shall endeavour, either in the framework of agreements concluded with neighbouring third countries or in the context of agreements on functional airspace blocks, to extend the application of this Regulation to those countries. Implementing rules : for the development of implementing rules the Commission may issue mandates to Eurocontrol or to another body, setting out the tasks to be performed and the timetable for this and taking into account the relevant deadlines laid down in this Regulation. There is a provision on penalties for infringements of the Regulation in particular by airspace users and service providers. Stakeholder consultations : Member States shall establish consultation mechanisms for appropriate involvement of stakeholders, including professional staff representative bodies, in the implementation of the single European sky. The text sets out an open list of stakeholders. Improved performance system : a performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions shall be set up and include: a) Community-wide performance targets on the key performance areas of safety, environment, capacity and cost-efficiency; (b) national plans, or plans for functional airspace blocks, including performance targets, ensuring consistency with the Community-wide performance targets; and c) periodic review, monitoring and benchmarking of performance of air navigation services and network functions. The text sets out the procedures that will apply to the performance scheme, as well as the reference periods . For the detailed functioning of the performance scheme, the Commission must adopt implementing rules which must cover certain specified factors. Report : the Commission shall first report to the European Parliament and to the Council 18 months after the entry into force of this Regulation, and at the end of each reference period thereafter. European Aviation Safety Agency : when implementing this Regulation and Regulations (EC) No 550/2004, (EC) No 551/2004 and (EC) No 552/2004, Member States and the Commission, in accordance with their respective roles, shall coordinate as appropriate with the EASA to ensure that all safety aspects are properly addressed. Air navigation service providers : the compromise text adds additional provisions to Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 with regard to the duties of national supervisory authorities. An additional Article is inserted on qualified entities. Functional airspace blocks (FABs): Member States shall take all necessary measures in order to ensure the implementation of functional airspace blocks no later than 3 years following the entry into force of this Regulation. FABs must also ensure consistency with the European route network and facilitate consistency with Community-wide performance targets. The text adds provisions regarding the Commission’s assessment of the fulfilment of requirements for FABs. Coordinator: in order to facilitate the establishment of the functional airspace blocks, the Commission may designate a natural person as Functional Airspace Blocks System Coordinator ("the Coordinator"). The Coordinator shall facilitate at the request of all Member States concerned and, where appropriate, third countries taking part in the same FAB, overcoming of difficulties in their negotiation process in order to speed up the establishment of functional airspace blocks. He will act on the basis of a mandate from all Member States concerned and, where appropriate, third countries taking part in the same FAB. He shall act impartially in particular vis-à-vis Member States, third countries, the Commission and the stakeholders. The Coordinator will report to the Commission, to the Single Sky Committee and to the European Parliament every 3 months after his/her designation. The remit of the Coordinator shall expire when the last FAB agreement is signed but no later than three years following the entry into force of this Regulation. The text also deals with relations with military authorities Costs: a provision on determined costs is inserted and the text states that in respect of the functional airspace blocks and as part of their respective framework agreements, Member States shall make reasonable efforts to agree on common principles for charging policy;" Common projects : common projects may assist the successful implementation of the ATM Master Plan. Such projects shall, furthermore, support the objectives of the Regulation to improve the performance of the European aviation system in key areas such as capacity, flight and cost efficiency as well as environmental sustainability, within the overriding safety objectives. The Commission may develop guidance material concerning the way in which such projects can support the implementation of the ATM Master Plan. Such guidance material shall not prejudice mechanisms for the deployment of such projects in relation with a functional airspace block as agreed upon by the partners of those blocks. The Commission may also decide to set up common projects for network-related functions , which are of particular importance for the improvement of the overall performance of air traffic management and air navigation services in Europe. Such common projects may be considered eligible for funding support via European funds within the multiannual financial framework. To this end, and without prejudice to Member States" competence to decide on the use of their financial resources, the Commission shall carry out an independent cost-benefit analysis and appropriate consultations with Member States and with relevant stakeholders, exploring all appropriate means for financing the deployment thereof. The eligible costs of deployment of common projects shall be recovered in accordance with the principles of transparency and non-discrimination. Network management function : the agreement laid down certain principles that the Commission should observe when establishing the network management function.
  • date: 2009-09-07T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2009-10-21T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL
  • date: 2009-10-21T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2009-11-14T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to establish a harmonised regulatory framework for the creation of the single European sky. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EC) No 549/2004, (EC) No 550/2004, (EC) No 551/2004 and (EC) No 552/2004 in order to improve the performance and sustainability of the European aviation system. CONTENT: the Council adopted two regulations to improve the performance and safety of the European aviation system. This Regulation t strengthens the Single European Sky legislation while the second extends the tasks of the European Aviation Safety Agency . Both regulations were adopted following a first-reading agreement reached with the European Parliament in March 2009. This Regulation on the Single European Sky amends four existing regulations (Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 laying down the framework for the creation of the Single European Sky, Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 on the provision of air navigation services in the Single European Sky, Regulation (EC) No 551/2004 on the organisation and use of the airspace in the Single European Sky, Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 on the interoperability of the European air traffic management network) which were adopted in 2004. Since their adoption it has proved necessary to consolidate and address a number of challenges, relating in particular to: sustainable development – attenuating the environmental impact of aviation through, for example, the creation of a rational European route network, including shorter routes for intra-Community traffic; performance – the performance of the network in terms of reduction in delays and lower costs for airspace users; governance issues - ensuring that the system is supervised in a transparent and correct manner at national and EU level. The objective of the single European sky initiative is to enhance current air traffic safety standards, to contribute to the sustainable development of the air transport system and to improve the overall performance of air traffic management (ATM) and air navigation services (ANS) for general air traffic in Europe, with a view to meeting the requirements of all airspace users. This single European sky will comprise a coherent pan-European network of routes, network management and air traffic management systems based only on safety, efficiency and technical considerations, for the benefit of all airspace users. In pursuit of this objective, the Regulation establishes a harmonised regulatory framework for the creation of the single European sky. The application of the Regulation is without prejudice to Member States’ sovereignty over their airspace and to the requirements of the Member States relating to public order, public security and defence matters and the Regulation does not cover military operations and training. It is also without prejudice to the rights and duties of Member States under the 1944 Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation (the Chicago Convention). In this context, an additional objective of the Regulation is, in the fields it covers, to assist Member States in fulfilling their obligations under the Chicago Convention, by providing a basis for a common interpretation and uniform implementation of its provisions, and by ensuring that these provisions are duly taken into account in this Regulation and in the rules drawn up for its implementation. The Regulation sets a fixed deadline for the implementation of functional airspace blocks that are a tool for a more rational and efficient European airspace. In addition, it strengthens the central network function at the EU level, as well as the principles concerning the degree of autonomy to be accorded to national supervisory authorities responsible for overseeing the provision of aeronautical services in Member States. Functional airspace blocks : the functional airspace blocks are key enablers for enhancing cooperation between air navigation service providers in order to improve performance and create synergies. The Regulation provides that by 4 December 2012 , Member States must take the necessary measures in order to ensure the implementation of functional airspace blocks with a view to achieving the required capacity and efficiency of the air traffic management network within the single European sky and maintaining a high level of safety and contributing to the overall performance of the air transport system and a reduced environmental impact. Member States shall cooperate to the fullest extent possible with each other, in particular Member States establishing neighbouring functional airspace blocks, in order to ensure compliance with this provision. Where relevant, cooperation may also include third countries taking part in functional airspace blocks. Functional airspace blocks system coordinator : in order to facilitate the establishment of the functional airspace blocks, the Commission may designate a natural person as functional airspace blocks system coordinator (the Coordinator), who will facilitate at the request of all Member States concerned and, where appropriate, third countries taking part in the same functional airspace block, overcoming of difficulties in their negotiation process in order to speed up the establishment of functional airspace blocks. The Coordinator shall act impartially in particular with regard to Member States, third countries, the Commission and the stakeholders. Performance scheme : to drive improved performance of ATM and air navigation services (ANS), the Regulation establishes a framework for the definition, implementation and enforcement of binding performance targets in key performance areas in line with the policies of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO). An indispensable feature of such a framework is an appropriate mechanism for reporting, examining, evaluating and disseminating performance data of ATM and ANS along with a relevant incentive scheme to encourage achievement of the targets. SEFIR: in view of the creation of functional airspace blocks and the setting up of the performance scheme, the Commission should determine and take into account the necessary conditions for the Community to create a Single European Flight Information Region (SEFIR), to be requested by the Member States from the ICAO in accordance with both the established procedures of that organisation and the rights, obligations and responsibilities of Member States under the Chicago Convention. By encompassing the airspace under the responsibility of the Member States, the SEFIR should facilitate common planning and integrated operations in order to overcome regional bottlenecks. Such a SEFIR should include the necessary flexibility to reflect specific needs such as traffic density and the level of complexity required. National supervisory authorities : national supervisory authorities have a key role to play in the implementation of the single European sky and the Commission should therefore facilitate cooperation among them in order to enable the exchange of best practices and to develop a common approach, including through enhanced cooperation at regional level. This cooperation should take place on a regular basis. The national supervisory authorities shall be independent of air navigation service providers. This independence shall be achieved through adequate separation, at the functional level at least, between the national supervisory authorities and such providers. Common projects : common projects may assist the successful implementation of the air traffic management (ATM) Master Plan. Such projects shall support the objectives of this Regulation to improve the performance of the European aviation system in key areas such as capacity, flight and cost efficiency as well as environmental sustainability, within the overriding safety objectives. The Commission may also decide to set up common projects for network-related functions which are of particular importance for the improvement of the overall performance of air traffic management and air navigation services in Europe. Consultation of stakeholders : the Member States, acting in accordance with their national legislation, shall establish consultation mechanisms for appropriate involvement of stakeholders, including professional staff representative bodies, in the implementation of the single European sky. The Commission shall establish a consultation mechanism at Community level. The text includes a list of interested parties. Report : the Commission shall periodically review the application of this Regulation report to the European Parliament and to the Council by 4 June 2011, and at the end of each reference period. Review : the Commission shall submit a study no later than 4 December 2012 evaluating the legal, safety, industrial, economic and social impacts of the application of market principles to the provision of communication, navigation, surveillance and aeronautical information services, compared to existing oralternative organisational principles and taking into account developments in the functional airspace blocks and in available technology. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 04/12/2009. Article 6(2) and (6) of Regulation (EC) No 551/2004 (Network management and design), as amended by this Regulation, shall apply from the date specified in their respective implementing rules but no later than 4 December 2012. docs: title: Regulation 2009/1070 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R1070 title: OJ L 300 14.11.2009, p. 0034 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:300:TOC
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
TRAN/6/64738
New
  • TRAN/6/64738
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R1070
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R1070
procedure/instrument
Old
Regulation
New
  • Regulation
  • Amending Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 2001/0060(COD) Amending Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 2001/0235(COD) Amending Regulation (EC) No 551/2004 2001/0236(COD) Amending Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 2001/0237(COD)
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.20.01 Air transport and air freight
  • 3.20.15.02 Air transport agreements and cooperation
New
3.20.01
Air transport and air freight
3.20.15.02
Air transport agreements and cooperation
procedure/summary
  • Amending Regulation (EC) No 549/2004
  • Amending Regulation (EC) No 550/2004
  • Amending Regulation (EC) No 551/2004
  • Amending Regulation (EC) No 552/2004
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0388/COM_COM(2008)0388_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0388/COM_COM(2008)0388_EN.pdf
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
activities
  • date: 2008-06-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0388/COM_COM(2008)0388_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52008PC0388:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2008)0388 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission: DG: Energy and Transport Commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
  • date: 2008-07-08T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2008-08-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: RIERA MADURELL Teresa body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean
  • date: 2008-12-08T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2913
  • date: 2008-12-08T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2008-08-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: RIERA MADURELL Teresa body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-01-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-2&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0002/2009 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2008-08-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: RIERA MADURELL Teresa body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-03-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090324&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16644&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-169 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0169/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-30T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2935
  • date: 2009-09-07T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 2959
  • date: 2009-09-07T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
  • date: 2009-10-21T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2009-10-21T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2009-11-14T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R1070 title: Regulation 2009/1070 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2009:300:TOC title: OJ L 300 14.11.2009, p. 0034
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2008-08-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: RIERA MADURELL Teresa
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2008-07-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean
links
National parliaments
European Commission
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
TRAN/6/64738
reference
2008/0127(COD)
instrument
Regulation
legal_basis
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 100-p2
stage_reached
Procedure completed
summary
subtype
Legislation
title
Performance and sustainability of the European aviation system
type
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
final
subject