Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI | MIKOLÁŠIK Miroslav ( PPE) | |
Former Responsible Committee | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI | WIKSTRÖM Cecilia ( ALDE) | |
Former Committee Opinion | LIBE | ||
Former Committee Opinion | JURI | Tadeusz ZWIEFKA ( PPE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 168-p4
Legal Basis:
TFEU 168-p4Events
The Commission presents a report on the implementation of Directive 2010/53/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on standards of quality and safety of human organs intended for transplantation. The report is based on responses to a survey launched by the Commission in 2014, to which 29 countries replied (i.e. all Member States and Norway).
Implementation of the Directive: In general, the survey shows that the Member States have implemented EU legislation on bodies in an adequate way:
all Member States have appointed competent authorities at national level and have established supervisory mechanisms to ensure standards of safety and quality of human organs; all countries reported having an authorisation scheme for organ procurement agencies; 26 Member States reported that organ procurement teams came from overseas on a regular or ad hoc basis. For 21 of these, these activities are carried out in a structured collaboration, most often with Eurotransplant (Germany, Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Hungary, Luxembourg, Netherlands and Slovenia) or Scandiatransplant (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden) or within these organisations; on-site checks, audits or inspections of procurement centres were carried out in 22 countries. The frequency of such inspections varies from year to year every three to five years, but most frequently every two years (in seven countries); all Member States indicated that they applied at least one of these three approaches to assess the competence of health personnel : checking of qualifications at recruitment (23 countries), participation in regular training programmes (24 countries) or additional certification (11 countries); sixteen Member States and Norway have adopted a system of tacit consent at the national level for organ donation (consent is assumed unless declared otherwise before death). Seven Member States have established an explicit consent system (donors must expressly agree to organ donation), while four countries have a mixed system; most countries have a register or records for living donors (23 out of 29). The majority of countries (27 out of 29) monitor donors living after the donation. Sixteen countries offer a lifetime medical check-up, while seven have defined a limited duration for donor monitoring, ranging from one to thirty years; all Member States indicated that they have set up authorisation schemes for transplant centres .
Additional efforts: given the rather general nature of legal requirements in EU law, the structure of national organisations may be fragmented and vary considerably between countries. As a result, the report highlights the importance of good coordination within countries (by means of a strong and well-informed contact point) and between them.
The Commission also recommends that further efforts be made to improve the monitoring carried out by the Member States , both as regards recipients and living donors, as well as certain aspects of the quality and safety framework, for example procedures or authorisations.
Indeed, some countries have indicated that they do not have procedures in place to date, such as verifying the identity of the donor, verifying information on consent, or ensuring traceability.
Some of these efforts are already being deployed in the framework of work financed by the Commission. Upcoming implementation surveys and reports will be able to highlight the progress made by Member States.
The Commission presents a report on the exercise of the power to adopt delegated acts conferred to the Commission pursuant to Article 24 of Directive 2010/53/EU on standards of quality and safety of human organs intended for transplantation.
To recall, the Annex lays down the minimum data set which has to be collected for each donation as well the complementary data set data to be collected in addition, based on the decision of the medical team, taking into account the availability of such information and the particular circumstances of the case.
The Commission is empowered to adopt, delegated acts in order to supplement or amend both the minimum data set and the complementary data set. This power was conferred for a period of five years following 27 August 2010 and it requires the Commission to prepare a report in that respect not later than six months before the end of the five-year period.
The Commission has not yet used the delegated powers conferred by Article 24.
In 2011, the Commission, having consulted experts, concluded that the contents of the data set defined in the Annex to Directive 2010/53/EU were sufficiently detailed to ensure appropriate quality and safety standards, and were in line with current clinical practices in Member States. It considered that delegated powers should not be used at that stage, as there was no specific need for further details in the data set already defined.
The Commission is of the view that the delegated powers conferred by Article 24 of Directive 2010/53/EU should remain in force. Transplantation medicine is evolving quickly. Therefore medical practices and scientific progress may require adaptation of the data set for organ and donor characterisation, for example with the inclusion of tests not previously available on a large enough scale to allow for their mandatory inclusion. Such a need may also arise in an emergency situation related to a new serious risk to human health, where the Commission may be required to adopt delegated acts through the urgency procedure, in accordance with Article 28 of the Directive.
In addition, the EU-funded project FOEDUS will come to an end in 2016 and will deliver guidelines and further consensus positions on organ and donor characterisation. This outcome will further support the Commission in assessing the need to amend the Annex to Directive 2010/53/EU.
PURPOSE: to establish rules on the donation, testing, characterisation, procurement, preservation, transport and transplantation of organs intended for transplantation.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Directive 2010/45/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on standards of quality and safety of human organs intended for transplantation.
CONTENT: the Council adopted this Directive, following a first-reading agreement with the European Parliament. The Directive lays down rules to ensure standards of quality and safety for human organs intended for transplantation to the human body, in order to ensure a high level of human health protection. Where such organs are used for research purposes, the Directive only applies where they are intended for transplantation into the human body. It aims to minimise the risk for the organ transplant recipients and to facilitate the exchange of human organs between Member States. It indirectly also seeks to contribute to combating organ trafficking and increasing organ availability. In order to ensure a high level of protection for patients receiving a new organ, the Directive obliges Member States to:
create or designate a competent national authority which has to ensure compliance with the requirements of the Directive; establish a system for the authorisation of programmes of organ procurement and transplantation based on common quality and safety criteria. This system would provide a complete list of authorised centres throughout the EU, accessible to the public and professionals alike; introduce frameworks of quality and safety to ensure continuous monitoring of performance; put in place an organ traceability system while ensuring the anonymity of both the donor and the recipient; take measures to gather serious adverse events related to the procurement, testing and transport of organs, as well as any serious adverse reactions observed during or after transplantation; ensure that any organ donation is unpaid and voluntary.
With a view to facilitating cooperation between Member States and to improving the prospects of receiving an organ, in particular of recipients in need of a rare match, the Directive provides for:
the introduction of quality and safety conditions; the standardised collection of the organ's characteristics needed to make a proper risk assessment; the establishment of a mechanism for the transmission of the information; the setting up of a mechanism for cross-border exchanges of organs to ensure traceability of the organ and reporting of serious adverse events.
Although the number of organ donations and transplantations has grown steadily across the EU, saving thousands of lives each year, nearly 56000 patients are currently on a waiting list for a new organ. Almost 12 people die every day in the EU while waiting for a new heart, liver, lung or another organ.
Reports concerning the Directive : Member States shall report to the Commission before 27 August 2013 and every three years thereafter on the activities undertaken in relation to the Directive, and on the experience gained in implementing it. The Commission shall report before 27 August 2014 and every three years thereafter on the implementation of the Directive.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 26 August 2010.
TRANSPOSITION: 27 August 2012.
The European Parliament adopted by 643 votes to 16 with 8 abstentions a resolution setting out its position at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure (formerly known as the codecision procedure) with a view to the adoption of on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on standards of quality and safety of human organs intended for transplantation. Following agreement with the Council, it made some amendments:
Scope : this Directive shall also apply to the procurement of organs of human origin intended for transplantation.
Definitions : Parliament amends certain definitions, including “donor” and inserts others, including “competent authority””. It also states that the definition of an “organ” includes a part of an organ if its function is to be used for the same purpose as the entire organ in the human body, maintaining the requirements of structure and vascularisation.
Framework for quality and safety : the resolution states that the framework for quality and safety shall provide for the adoption and implementation of:
procedures for the verification of donor identity; procedures for the verification of the details of the consent, authorisation or absence of any objection of the donor or donor family; procedures for the verification of the completion of the organ and donor characterisation; procedures for the procurement, preservation packaging and labelling of organs;
procedures needed to ensure traceability, guaranteeing compliance with the legal requirements on the protection of personal data and confidentiality; procedures for the accurate, rapid and verifiable reporting of serious adverse events and reactions; procedures for the management of serious adverse events and reaction.
These procedures shall specify, inter alia the responsibilities of procurement organizations, European organ exchange organisations and transplantation centres in this respect. In addition, the framework for quality and safety shall ensure that the healthcare personnel involved at all stages of the chain from donation to transplantation or disposal is suitably qualified or trained and competent, and shall develop specific training programmes for such personnel.
Procurement organisations : Members deleted certain clauses on organisational structure and operational procedures of procurement organisation, stating that such detailed provisions did not belong in the body of the text. They deleted certain provisions on normal standards for operation theatres for the same reasons.
Organ and donor characterisation : the text states that Member States shall ensure that all procured organs and donors thereof are characterised before transplantation through the collection of the information set out in the Annex. Information specified in Part A of the Annex contains a set of minimum data which has to be collected for each donation. Information specified in Part B of the Annex contains a set of complementary information to be collected in addition, based on the decision of the medical team, taking into account the availability of such information and the particular circumstances of the case.
If according to a risk-benefit analysis in a particular case, including life-threatening emergencies, the expected benefits for the recipient outweigh the risks posed by incomplete data, an organ may be considered for transplantation even where not all of the minimum data specified in Part A of the Annex are available.
In order to meet the quality and safety requirements laid down in the Directive, the medical team shall endeavour to obtain all necessary information from living donors and for that purpose shall provide them with the information they need to understand the consequences of donation. In the case of deceased donation, whenever possible and appropriate, the medical team shall endeavour to obtain such information from relatives or other persons. The medical team shall also endeavour to make all parties from whom information is requested aware of the importance of the swift transmission of this information.
Where organs are exchanged between Member States, they shall ensure that the information on organ and donor characterisation, as detailed in the Annex, is transmitted to the other Member State with which the organ is exchanged in conformity with the procedures established by the Commission.
New recitals note that the shortage of organs available for transplantation and the time constraints in the process of organ donation and transplantation makes it necessary to take into account those situations in which the transplantation team lacks some of the information required for donor and organ characterisation as set out in Part A of the Annex, which specifies a minimum mandatory data set of information. In those particular cases, the medical team shall assess the particular risk posed to the potential recipient by the lack of information and by not proceeding with transplantation of the organ in question. Therefore, if a complete characterisation of an organ, according to Part A of the Annex, is not possible in time or due to particular circumstances, such organ may be considered for transplantation where the non-transplantation may pose a greater risk to the potential recipient. Part B of the Annex, referring to a complementary data set of information, will allow performing a more detailed organ and donor characterisation.
Transport of organs : Parliament added to the requirements that the organs transported must be accompanied by the report on the donor and organ characterization.
Traceability: Member States shall ensure the implementation of a donor and recipient identification system that can identify each donation and each of the organs and recipients associated with it. With regard to such system, Member States shall ensure that confidentiality and data security measures are in place in compliance with Union and national rules,
Furthermore, where organs are exchanged between Member States, they shall transmit the necessary information to ensure the traceability of organs, in conformity with the procedures established by the Commission in accordance with Article 29.
Reporting systems and management for serious adverse events and reactions : the text specifies that Member States shall ensure that procedures are in place for: (i) the notification of any serious adverse event and reaction to the competent authority and to the concerned procurement or transplantation organisation in due time; (ii)the notification of the management measures with regards to serious adverse events and reactions to the competent authority in due time.
Principles governing organ donation : the text specifies that the principle of non-payment shall not prevent living donors from receiving compensation, provided it is strictly limited to making good the expenses and inconveniences related to the donation. For such cases, Member State shall define the conditions under which compensation may be granted, while avoiding any financial incentives or benefit for a potential donor.
Protection of the living donor : Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure the highest possible protection of living donors in order to fully guarantee the quality and safety of organs for transplantation. They shall endeavour to carry out the follow-up of living donors and shall have a system in place in accordance with national provisions, in order to identify, report, and manage any event potentially relating to the quality and safety of the donated organ, and hence of the safety of the recipient, as well as any serious adverse reaction in the living donor that may result from the donation.
Data protection and confidentiality : the fundamental right to protection of personal data must be fully and effectively protected in all organ donation and transplantation activities, in conformity with Union provisions on the protection of personal data, such as Directive 95/46/EC. Member States must ensure that the data processed are kept confidential and secure and that donors and recipients whose data are being processed within the scope of the Directive are not identifiable, except as permitted by Directive 95/46/EC, and national provisions implementing that Directive. Any use of systems or data that makes the identifications of donors or recipients possible with a view to tracing donors or recipients other than the purposes permitted by Directive 95/46/EC, including medical purposes, and national provisions implementing that Directive should be penalized according to this Directive
Designation and tasks of competent authorities : Member States may delegate, or may allow a Competent Authority to delegate, part or all of the tasks assigned to it under this Directive to another body which is deemed suitable under national provisions. Such a body may also assist a Competent Authority in carrying out its functions.
Exchange of organs with third countries : exchanges from or to third countries must be supervised by the competent authority. For this purpose, the competent authority and European organ exchange organisations may establish agreements with counterparts in third countries. The supervision of organ exchanges with third countries may be delegated by the Member States to European organ exchange organisations.
Delegated acts : there are new provisions on delegated acts, and exercise and revocation of the delegation, as well as objections to delegated acts, in accordance with the new Treaty.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the report drawn up by Miroslav MIKOLASIK on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on standards of quality and safety of human organs intended for transplantation. It recommended that the European Parliament’s position at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure (formerly known as the codecision procedure) should be to amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Scope: Members add that the Directive shall not prevent Member States from maintaining or introducing more stringent protective measures, provided that they comply with the provisions of the Treaty.
Definitions: the report amends certain definitions, including “donor”, “authorisation”, “procurement organisation”, “serious adverse event” and “serious adverse reaction.” It inserts others, including “competent authority””. It also states that the definition of an “organ” includes a part of an organ if its function is to be used for the same purpose as the entire organ in the human body, maintaining the requirements of structure and vascularisation.
Framework for national quality and safety programmes : the report adds that the national quality programmes shall provide for the adoption and implementation of, inter alia, standard operating procedures for the identification and referral of potential donors. Members feel that identification of potential donors in intensive care units and their referral is the indispensable prerequisite for all organ donation activities. Numerous studies show that there is potentially between 40 to 50 donors per million people in every Member State. This means that every Member State can increase its organ donation rate through systematic analysis of the existing donor potential.
The report also wants national quality programmes to provide for the adoption and implementation of the following :
procedures to ensure traceability, guaranteeing compliance with the legal requirements on the protection of personal data and confidentiality. Such procedures shall include the responsibilities of procurement organisations and transplantation centres with regard to traceability; procedures for the accurate, rapid and verifiable reporting of serious adverse events and, including the responsibilities of procurement organisations and transplantation centres with regard to such reporting; procedures for the management of serious adverse events and reactions, including the responsibilities of procurement organisations and transplantation centres with regard to such management. standard operating procedures for tracing and limiting the risks of unethical or illegal activities, particularly concerning decisions for organ procurement and transplantation.
Furthermore, the framework for the quality and safety of organs shall ensure that the healthcare personnel involved at all stages of the chain from donation to transplantation or disposal are suitably qualified and competent, and shall develop specific training programmes for such personnel, and shall establish standard operating procedures for matters referred to in the text
Members state that national quality programmes shall also authorise, in life-threatening emergencies, transplant operations using an organ which is not optimal, after consultation between the healthcare personnel and the patient, or the patient's family where the patient is unable to state his or her choice.
Lastly, the programmes should determine the status of transplant coordinators from the stage of organ donation to that of monitoring of the recipient. Members note that Parliament has previously stressed the central role played by transplant coordinators with a view to identifying potential donors. It is therefore essential that the national quality programmes should provide for the establishment of a status of transplant coordinator.
Procurement organisations : Members deleted certain clauses on organisational structure and operational procedures of procurement organisation, stating that such detailed provisions did not belong in the body of the text. They deleted certain provisions on normal standards for operation theatres for the same reasons
Transport of organs : Member States must ensure that the organisation involved in the transportation of organs ensures that the organ is transported with due care.
Traceability: Member States must ensure that access to systems permitting the identification of a donor or recipient is as restricted as possible. They must lay down penalties on (a) any unauthorised accessing of data or systems that makes identification of donors or recipients possible; (b) any use which is made of systems or data that makes the identification of donors or recipients possible with a view to tracing donors or recipients other than for necessary medical purposes.
Third parties : a new article stipulates that procurement organisations and transplantation centres may conclude written agreements with third parties for the carrying out of their functions.. Where they enter into written agreements, they must:
evaluate and select third parties on the basis of their ability to meet the standards laid down in the Directive; keep a complete list of the agreements that they have concluded with third parties; specify the responsibilities of the third parties and detailed procedures; provide copies of agreements with third parties at the request of the Competent Authority.
The committee refers to Directive 2004/23/EC on tissues and cells.
Principles governing organ donation : the report specifies that the principle of non-payment shall not prevent living donors from receiving compensation, provided it is strictly limited to making good the expenses and inconveniences related to the donation. For such cases, Member State shall define the conditions under which compensation may be granted, while avoiding any financial incentives or benefit for a potential donor.
It is added that:
the Commission, in close cooperation with Member States, the European Parliament and relevant stakeholders, shall examine the possibility of developing a system whereby the wishes expressed by citizens consenting to the donation of organs after they are deceased are taken into account in as many Member States as possible; Member States shall ensure that systems and registers are in place which are easily accessible for the purposes of recording the wishes of future donors, and that the competent authorities give priority to the wishes expressed by a donor over any possible contrary wishes of a spouse, first-degree relative or other person; they shall ensure that organs are allocated to recipients according to transparent, non-discriminatory and scientific criteria; organs must not be removed from a deceased person unless that person has been certified dead in accordance with national law; Member States shall intensify their cooperation within Interpol and Europol in order to address the problem of trafficking in organs more effectively; in order to minimise the risk of organ trafficking in the Union, Member States must reduce demand, promote organ donation more effectively, maintain strict legislation with regard to live unrelated donors, guarantee transparency of national registers and waiting lists, establish the legal responsibility of the medical professional for tracking irregularities, and share information.
In order to meet the quality and safety requirements laid down in this Directive, Member States shall endeavour to obtain all necessary information from living donors and to provide them with the information they need to understand the consequences of donation. In the case of deceased donation, Member States shall endeavour to obtain such information from relatives or other persons authorising donation. Member States shall make all parties, from whom information is requested, aware of the importance of swiftly transmitting such information.
Protection of the living donor : Members state that living donation should be seen as complementary to post-mortem donation and may be carried out where there is no suitable organ available from a deceased person. Living donations are predominantly carried out among family members and close relatives and/or for the benefit of a recipient with whom the donor has a close personal relationship, or where it can be proven that the donor is not acting for the purpose of financial gain in order to prevent commercialisation. Particularly, in the absence of such a close relationship, adequate provisions in national law of the Member States shall be made, thus assuring the highest possible protection of living donors.
The committee adds the following:
Member States shall also ensure that living donors are legally insured; no organ removal may be carried out on a person who under national law does not have the capacity to consent to it; follow-up must be ensured in relation to living donors in accordance with national provisions, in order to identify, report, and manage any event potentially relating to the quality and safety of the donated organ, and hence of the safety of the recipient, as well as any serious adverse reaction in the living donor that may result from the donation.
Data protection and confidentiality : Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that donors and recipients whose data are being processed under the Directive are identifiable only by persons who can demonstrate a need to know their identities. They must ensure the confidentiality, integrity, accountability and availability of the personal data of donors and recipients.
The committee deleted the clause on anonymisation of donors and recipients.
Designation and tasks of competent authorities : Member States may delegate, or may allow a Competent Authority to delegate, part or all of the tasks assigned to it under this Directive to another body which is deemed suitable under national provisions. Such a body may also assist a Competent Authority in carrying out its functions. They must ensure that procurement organisations and transplantations centres are subject to public controls. In addition, the competent authority shall:
ensure that special protocols are created governing procedures for operative and post-operative stages under the responsibility of the respective operating teams, specialist pathologists and specialists in other necessary fields; collect relevant post-transplantation outcome data in order to allow comparable assessment of quality and safety of organ transplantation, which will serve to further improve the transplantation process at European level.
Exchange of organs with third countries : the competent authority shall consult the national Data Protection Authority in respect of developing a framework for the transfer to and from third countries of data concerning the exchange of organs. The specific regime for the transfer of personal data to third countries as laid down in Directive 95/46/EC shall apply. Members add that responsibility for authorising organ exchanges with third countries may be delegated by the Member States to European organ exchange organisations.
Delegated acts: the committee inserts new provisions on delegated acts, and exercise and revocation of the delegation, as well as objections to delegated acts.
PURPOSE: to ensure that human organs used for transplantation in the EU comply with the same quality and safety requirements and to facilitate their exchange between Member States.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: over the past 50 years organ transplantation has become an established worldwide practice, bringing immense benefits to hundreds of thousands of patients. Organ transplantation is now the most cost-effective treatment for end-stage renal failure, while for end-stage failure of organs such as the liver, lung and heart it is the only available treatment. The shortage of organs is a major factor affecting transplantation programmes. Nearly 56 000 patients are now on waiting lists in the EU. Mortality rates while waiting for a heart, liver or lung transplant usually range from 15 to 30%. Donation rates and availability of organs varies considerably across Europe with achievable good practice delivering far greater benefits in some Member States than in others.
On 31 May 2007, the Commission adopted a Communication on organ donation and transplantation based on that analysis. This Communication proposes what activities the EU should undertake in the field of organ transplantation.
In December 2007, the Council adopted conclusions on organ donation and transplantation which recognised the importance of having high standards with respect to the quality and safety of organs for transplantation, so as to ensure a high level of protection for patients throughout Europe. The Council called on the Commission to consult the Member States, and continue its examination of the need for an EU framework on quality and safety for human organs. The European Parliament resolution adopted on 22 April 2008 recognised that it is vitally important to improve the quality and safety of organ donation and transplantation to reduce transplant risks. It invited the Commission to present a proposal for a directive stipulating requirements to ensure the quality and safety of organ donation across the EU.
CONTENT: this proposal for a Directive covers human organs, that are used for transplantation, during all the phases of the process – donation, procurement, testing, preservation, transport and use – and aims to ensure their quality and safety and hence a high level of health protection. Organs that are transplanted into the human body in clinical trials should comply with the quality and safety standards laid down in this Directive.
The added value of the Directive:
Ensuring quality and safety for patients at EU level : this Directive sets out the basic quality and safety requirements needed in every transplant system. More specifically, the proposal:
provides for the creation or designation of a competent national authority in each Member State which will ensure compliance with the requirements of the Directive; establishes a system for the authorisation of programmes of organ procurement and transplantation based on common quality and safety criteria. This system would provide a complete list of authorised centres throughout the European Union, accessible to the public and professionals alike; establishes common quality and safety standards for the processes of evaluating donors and human organs, thus ensuring the health of recipients; proposes the introduction of national quality programmes to ensure continuous monitoring of performance and improvement and learning; ensures that Member States put in place organ traceability systems. The Commission will adopt procedures for guaranteeing full traceability of organs exchanged between Member States; includes measures to capture serious adverse events related to the procurement, testing and transport of organs, as well as any serious adverse reactions observed during or after transplantation which may be connected to the procurement, testing and transport of the organ in the European Union. The Commission will adopt procedures for ensuring interoperability between the reporting systems on adverse events and reactions.
Ensuring the protection of donors : the proposed Directive contains a number of measures to protect living donors. These include correct evaluation of the health of the donor and comprehensive information about the risks prior to donation, the introduction of registers for living donors to follow up their health and measures to ensure the altruistic and voluntary donation of organs by living donors.
Facilitating cooperation between Member States and cross-border exchanges : the Directive will: i) put in place the quality and safety conditions needed to facilitate cross-border exchanges; ii) standardise the collection of the relevant information on the characteristics of the organ needed to make a proper risk assessment; iii) establish a mechanism for transmission of the information; iv) provide for the necessary mechanisms to be put in place for cross-border exchanges of organs to ensure traceability of the organ and pre-empt serious adverse reporting.
PURPOSE: to ensure that human organs used for transplantation in the EU comply with the same quality and safety requirements and to facilitate their exchange between Member States.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: over the past 50 years organ transplantation has become an established worldwide practice, bringing immense benefits to hundreds of thousands of patients. Organ transplantation is now the most cost-effective treatment for end-stage renal failure, while for end-stage failure of organs such as the liver, lung and heart it is the only available treatment. The shortage of organs is a major factor affecting transplantation programmes. Nearly 56 000 patients are now on waiting lists in the EU. Mortality rates while waiting for a heart, liver or lung transplant usually range from 15 to 30%. Donation rates and availability of organs varies considerably across Europe with achievable good practice delivering far greater benefits in some Member States than in others.
On 31 May 2007, the Commission adopted a Communication on organ donation and transplantation based on that analysis. This Communication proposes what activities the EU should undertake in the field of organ transplantation.
In December 2007, the Council adopted conclusions on organ donation and transplantation which recognised the importance of having high standards with respect to the quality and safety of organs for transplantation, so as to ensure a high level of protection for patients throughout Europe. The Council called on the Commission to consult the Member States, and continue its examination of the need for an EU framework on quality and safety for human organs. The European Parliament resolution adopted on 22 April 2008 recognised that it is vitally important to improve the quality and safety of organ donation and transplantation to reduce transplant risks. It invited the Commission to present a proposal for a directive stipulating requirements to ensure the quality and safety of organ donation across the EU.
CONTENT: this proposal for a Directive covers human organs, that are used for transplantation, during all the phases of the process – donation, procurement, testing, preservation, transport and use – and aims to ensure their quality and safety and hence a high level of health protection. Organs that are transplanted into the human body in clinical trials should comply with the quality and safety standards laid down in this Directive.
The added value of the Directive:
Ensuring quality and safety for patients at EU level : this Directive sets out the basic quality and safety requirements needed in every transplant system. More specifically, the proposal:
provides for the creation or designation of a competent national authority in each Member State which will ensure compliance with the requirements of the Directive; establishes a system for the authorisation of programmes of organ procurement and transplantation based on common quality and safety criteria. This system would provide a complete list of authorised centres throughout the European Union, accessible to the public and professionals alike; establishes common quality and safety standards for the processes of evaluating donors and human organs, thus ensuring the health of recipients; proposes the introduction of national quality programmes to ensure continuous monitoring of performance and improvement and learning; ensures that Member States put in place organ traceability systems. The Commission will adopt procedures for guaranteeing full traceability of organs exchanged between Member States; includes measures to capture serious adverse events related to the procurement, testing and transport of organs, as well as any serious adverse reactions observed during or after transplantation which may be connected to the procurement, testing and transport of the organ in the European Union. The Commission will adopt procedures for ensuring interoperability between the reporting systems on adverse events and reactions.
Ensuring the protection of donors : the proposed Directive contains a number of measures to protect living donors. These include correct evaluation of the health of the donor and comprehensive information about the risks prior to donation, the introduction of registers for living donors to follow up their health and measures to ensure the altruistic and voluntary donation of organs by living donors.
Facilitating cooperation between Member States and cross-border exchanges : the Directive will: i) put in place the quality and safety conditions needed to facilitate cross-border exchanges; ii) standardise the collection of the relevant information on the characteristics of the organ needed to make a proper risk assessment; iii) establish a mechanism for transmission of the information; iv) provide for the necessary mechanisms to be put in place for cross-border exchanges of organs to ensure traceability of the organ and pre-empt serious adverse reporting.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2022)0671
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2022)0376
- Follow-up document: COM(2016)0809
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2016)0451
- Follow-up document: COM(2015)0123
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2010/53
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 207 06.08.2010, p. 0014
- Final act published in Official Journal: Corrigendum to final act 32010L0053R(01)
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 243 16.09.2010, p. 0068
- Draft final act: 00019/2010/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)3805
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T7-0181/2010
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0106/2010
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0106/2010
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE439.155
- Committee opinion: PE430.861
- Committee draft report: PE430.898
- Contribution: COM(2008)0818
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1036/2009
- Legislative proposal: COM(2008)0818
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)2956
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)2957
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2008)0818
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2008)0818 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SEC(2008)2956
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2008)2957 EUR-Lex
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES1036/2009
- Committee draft report: PE430.898
- Committee opinion: PE430.861
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE439.155
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0106/2010
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2010)3805
- Draft final act: 00019/2010/LEX
- Follow-up document: COM(2015)0123 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2016)0809 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2016)0451
- Follow-up document: COM(2022)0671 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2022)0376
- Contribution: COM(2008)0818
Activities
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
151 |
2008/0238(COD)
2010/01/12
JURI
4 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 - paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Member States shall, in order to minimise the risk of organ trafficking in the European Union, reduce demand, promote organ donation more effectively, maintain strict legislation with regard to live unrelated donors, guarantee transparency of national registers and waiting lists, establish the legal responsibility of the medical profession for tracking irregularities, and share information.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 a (new) Article 13 a The Member States shall ensure that organisations and staff involved in providing organs from deceased donors have no organisational, financial or personal ties of any kind with organisations and staff involved in organ transplants, so as to prevent any scope for abuse in determining the eligibility of transplant donors and recipients.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) (16a) Combating organ trafficking should not remain the responsibility of the European Union alone. Member States should also take measures to that end, including reducing demand, promoting organ donation more effectively, maintaining strict legislation with regard to live donors, guaranteeing transparency of national registers and waiting lists, establishing the legal responsibility of the medical profession for tracking irregularities, and sharing information.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 - paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Member States shall intensify their cooperation under the auspices of Interpol and Europol in order to address the problem of trafficking in organs more effectively.
source: PE-438.152
2010/03/04
ENVI
147 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point g (g)
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point h (h)
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point i (i) ‘procurement’ means a coordinated process by which the donated organs become available
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point i a (new) ia)'making available' means the preparation, manipulation, preservation, packaging and transport of human organs;
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 –point j (j) "procurement organisation" means
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point j a (new) ja) 'competent authority' means one or more public or private non-profit making, competent body or bodies/organisation(s)/institution(s) particularly involved in the implementation of this Directive;
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point k (k) ‘preservation’ means the use of chemical agents, alterations in environmental conditions or other means
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point m (m) ‘serious adverse event’ means any undesired and unexpected occurrence associated with
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point n (n) ) ‘serious adverse reaction’ means an unintended or unexpected serious response, including a communicable disease, in the donor or in the recipient associated with
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point n (n)
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point p (p) ‘transplantation’ means the process of restoring certain functions of the human body by transferring
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r (r) ‘traceability’ means the ability for a competent authority to locate and identify the organ at each stage in the chain from donation to transplantation or disposal
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive Chapter II – title Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – title Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that a national quality programme is established to cover all stages of the chain from donation to transplantation or disposal, in order to ensure compliance with the rules laid down in this Directive, and shall do so by setting up appropriate public control mechanisms.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) standard operating procedures for the verification of the details of
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point e (e)
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 2 – points a – ec (new) Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point a – introductory part Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b – introductory part Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b – indent 3 – the responsibilities of procurement organisations and transplantation centres in the process of reporting pursuant to Article 11(1).
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (ba) authorise, in life-threatening emergencies, transplant operations using an organ which is not optimal, after consultation between the medical staff and the patient or his close family if the patient is unable to state his choice.
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point c Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) establish the qualifications
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a directive Article 4 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new) (ca) determine the status of transplant coordinators from the organ donation stage to monitoring of the recipient.
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that the procurement
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a directive Article 5 – paragraph 2 – introductory part Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that medical activities in procurement organisations, such as donor selection, the quality, effectiveness and integrity of the donation process, are performed under the advice and the supervision of a medical doctor as defined in Directive 2005/36/EC.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. Member States shall ensure that procurement takes place in dedicated facilities
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 2. Member States shall ensure that
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the organisation
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the organisations, bodies or companies involved in the transportation of organs have appropriate
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 1 – identification of the procurement organisation and the donor's hospital, including its address and telephone number;
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 3 – a statement that the package contains a human organ and marked
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 4 Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a directive Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 4 Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. The Competent authority shall indicate in the accreditation, designation, authorisation or licence which
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. The Competent authority shall indicate in the
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall, upon the request of the Commission or another Member State, provide information on the national requirements for the authorisation of transplantation centres. Member States shall seek to render authorisation criteria uniform throughout the Union.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure the implementation of a donor identification system that can identify each donation and each of the organs associated with it. Member States shall ensure that th
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure the implementation of a donor identification system that can identify each donation and each of the organs associated with it. Member States shall ensure that th
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that there is a reporting system in place to report, investigate, register and transmit relevant and necessary information concerning serious adverse events and reactions that may influence the quality and safety of human organs and which may be attributed to the testing, characterisation, procurement,
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that there is a reporting system in place to report, investigate, register and transmit relevant and necessary information concerning serious adverse events and reactions that may influence the quality and safety of human organs and which may be attributed to the testing, characterisation, procurement,
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a directive Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that there is a reporting system in place to report, investigate, register and transmit relevant and necessary information concerning serious unexpected adverse events and reactions that may influence the quality and safety of human organs and which may be attributed to the procurement, testing, and transport of organs, as well as any serious adverse reaction observed during or after
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 a (new) Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a directive Chapter III – title DONOR
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that donations of human organs from deceased and living donors are voluntary and unpaid. This should not prevent living donors from receiving compensation, which shall be strictly limited to making good the expense and inconvenience involved in the donation. In that case, Member States shall define the conditions under which compensation may be granted.
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that donations of human organs from deceased and living donors are voluntary and unpaid. The principle of non-payment must not prevent a living donor from receiving compensation for expenses incurred or for loss of income, provided that this does not constitute a financial benefit.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall prohibit
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a directive Article 13 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that the procurement of organs is
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 Procurement shall only be carried out only after compliance with all
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a In order to meet the quality and safety requirements laid down in this Directive, Member States shall endeavour to obtain all necessary information from living donors and to provide them with the information which they need to understand the consequences of donation. In the case of deceased donation, Member States shall endeavour to obtain such information from relatives or other persons authorizing donation. Member States shall also make all parties from whom information is requested aware of the importance of the swift transmission of such information.
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive Article 14 – paragraph 1 a (new) In order to meet the quality and safety requirements laid down in this Directive, Member States shall endeavour to obtain all necessary information from living donors and to provide them with the information which they need to understand the consequences of donation. In the case of deceased donation, Member States shall endeavour to obtain such information from relatives or other persons authorizing donation. Member States shall also make all parties from whom information is requested aware of the importance of the swift transmission of such information.
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Living donations shall be seen as complementary to post-mortem donations and only serve as a last resort where no suitable alternative, such as an organ from a deceased donor, is available. Living donations shall in principle be restricted to donations among close relatives and spouses due to the implicit danger of exploitation.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that living donors are selected on the basis of their health and medical history, including a psychological evaluation if deemed necessary, by qualified and trained professionals. Such assessments may provide for the exclusion of persons whose donation could present a health risk to others, such as the possibility of transmitting diseases, or a serious risk to themselves. Member States shall also ensure that living donors are legally insured.
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. In order to comply with the principle of non-commercialisation of the human body, Member States shall ensure that possible compensation for living donors is strictly limited to ensuring healthcare insurance for donation-related long-term medical conditions and to making good the expenses relating to the donation, such as travel expenses, child minding costs, loss of earnings or costs of recovery, and prohibiting any financial incentives for a potential donor.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Donors may receive compensation, which shall be strictly limited to making good the expense and inconvenience involved in the donation. In such cases, Member States shall define the conditions under which compensation may be granted.
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2aThis should not prevent living donors from receiving compensation, which shall be strictly limited to making good the expense and inconvenience involved in the donation. In such cases, Member States shall define the conditions under which compensation may be granted.
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 2 b (new) Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that the
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a directive Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Member States shall ensure that living donors are followed up in accordance with national provisions, in order to identify, report, and manage any event potentially relating to the quality and safety of the donated organ, and hence of the recipient, as well as any serious adverse reaction in the living donor that may result from the donation.
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a directive Article 16 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that the fundamental right to protection of personal data is fully and effectively protected in all organ donation and transplantation activities, in conformity with Community provisions on the protection of personal data, such as Directive 95/46/EC, and in particular Articles 8 (3), 16, 17 and 28 (2) of that Directive.
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 – title Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 – title Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that all personal data of donors and recipients gathered and processed within the
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that all personal data of donors and recipients gathered and processed within the
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a directive Article 17 Member States shall take all necessary measures to ensure that all personal data of donors and recipients
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – title Designation and tasks of the competent
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 Member States shall designate the competent authority, or
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 Member States shall designate the competent
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 1 Member States shall designate the competent authority,
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 2 – introductory part The competent authorit
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) put in place and keep updated a
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new) (aa) Each Member State may delegate, or may allow a Competent Authority to delegate, part or all of the tasks assigned to it under this Directive to another body which is deemed appropriate under national provisions. Such a body may also assist a Competent Authority in carrying out its functions.
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new) (aa) Each Member State may delegate, or may allow a Competent Authority to delegate, part or all of the tasks assigned to it under this Directive to another body which is deemed appropriate under national provisions. Such a body may also assist a Competent Authority in carrying out its functions.
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a directive Article 18 – paragraph 2 – point e Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that the competent
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) establishes and maintains a register of
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a directive Article 19 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall, upon the request of the Commission or another Member State, provide information on the register of
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a directive Article 20 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall set up a network of the competent
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Responsibility for authorising organ exchanges with third countries may be transferred by the Member States to European organ exchange organisations.
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a directive Article 21 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Responsibility for authorising organ exchanges with third countries may be transferred by Member States to European organ exchange organisations.
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall report to the Commission before …………*.and every three years thereafter on the activities undertaken in relation to the provisions of this Directive, and on the experience gained in implementing it. * 6 years after the entry into force of this Directive.
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a directive Article 23 – paragraph 2 2. Before …….** and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall transmit to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions ,a report on the implementation of this Directive **5 years after the entry into force of this Directive
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) rules for the updating and transmission of information on human organ
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) procedures for ensuring the reporting of unexpected serious adverse events and reactions.
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the interconnection between the reporting systems on unexpected adverse events and reactions referred to in Article 11 (3);
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a directive Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the establishment and ability to function
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a This Directive shall not prevent a Member State from maintaining or introducing more stringent protective measures, provided that they comply with the provisions of the Treaty.
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – subparagraph 2 a (new) 1a. This Directive shall not prevent a Member State from maintaining or introducing more stringent protective measures, provided that they comply with the provisions of the Treaty.
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a directive Article 27 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a directive Annex – Introduction For the purpose of Article 7 the following information shall be gathered by the procurement organisation or procurement team on the characteristics of the organ and of the donor,
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 1 (1) Over the past 50 years organ transplantation has become an established worldwide practice, bringing immense benefits to hundreds of thousands of patients. The use of human organs for transplantation has steadily increased during the last two decades. Organ transplantation is now the
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Risks however are associated with the use of organs in transplantation. The extensive therapeutic use of human organs for transplantation demands that their quality and safety should be such as to improve the risk/benefit ratio while minimis
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Risks however are associated with the use of organs in transplantation. The extensive therapeutic use of human organs for transplantation demands that their quality and safety should be such as to minimi
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Risks however are associated with the use of organs in transplantation. The extensive therapeutic use of human organs for transplantation demands that their quality and safety should be such as to minimise any risks associated with the transmission of diseases. Well-organised national transplant systems and use of the best available expertise, technology and innovative medical treatment can significantly reduce the associated risks of transplanted organs for patients.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) Risks however are associated with the use of organs in transplantation. The
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 (3) In addition the availability of organs of human origin used for therapeutic purposes is dependent on Community citizens being prepared to donate them. The Member States have a responsibility to increase organ donations nationally since possible defects in their organ transplantation systems cannot be remedied by transporting organs or moving patients from one country to another. In order to safeguard public health and to prevent the transmission of diseases by these organs, precautionary measures should be taken during their procurement, transport and use.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The principal challenge faced by the European Union and Member States with regard to organ transplantation is that of reducing the shortage of organs and donors. It is therefore crucial to expand the pool of available organs by acquiring the means, at Union level, of optimising the number of donations after brain death or cardiac failure, increase the number of living donors and broaden the pool of potential donors to cover persons who meet 'expanded' donor criteria.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Every year organs are exchanged between Member States. The exchange of organs is an important way of
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 4 (4) Every year organs are exchanged between Member States. The exchange of organs is an important way of
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 (6) There is therefore a need, while duly respecting the subsidiarity principle pursuant to Article 168(7) TFEU (formerly Article 152(5) TEC), for common quality and safety standards for the procurement, transport and use of human organs at Community level. These standards would facilitate exchanges of organs to the benefit of thousands of European patients in need of this type of therapy each year. Community legislation should ensure that human organs comply with
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 6 a (new) (6a) In accordance with Article 168(7) of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union, the measures adopted under paragraph 4(a) of that Article do not affect national provisions on the medical use of organs. Therefore the surgical act of transplantation itself does not fall within the scope of this Directive. However, in view of the objective of reducing the associated risks of the transplanted organs, it is necessary to include within the scope of this Directive certain provisions concerning the transplantation process and in particular provisions aimed at addressing those unintended and unexpected situations occurring during the transplantation that might affect the quality and safety of organs.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) In order to reduce the risks and maximise the benefits of the transplantation process. Member States need to operate an effective national quality programme. This programme should be implemented and maintained throughout the entire chain from donation to transplantation or disposal, and should
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) In order to reduce the risks and maximise the benefits of the transplantation process. Member States need to operate an effective national quality programme, ensuring that they have a precise description of the donor and the organs. This programme should be implemented and maintained throughout the entire chain from donation to transplantation or disposal, and should cover the personnel and organisation, premises, equipment, materials, documentation and record-keeping involved. The national quality programme should include auditing where necessary. Member States should be able to delegate, through written agreements, the responsibility for parts of this programme to European organ exchange organisations.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 8 (8) The conditions of procurement should be supervised by the Competent Authorities, t
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 (10) Pre-transplant evaluation of potential donors is an essential part of organ transplantation. This evaluation must provide enough information for the transplant centre to undertake a proper risk-benefit analysis. The risks and characteristics of the organ must be identified and documented to allow
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 13 (13) An organ donor is also very often a tissue donor. Quality and safety requirements for organs should complement and be linked with the existing Community system for tissues and cells laid down in Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 14 (14) Personnel directly involved in the donation, testing, characterisation, procurement,
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 15 (15) As a general principle, exchange of organs from/to third countries should be supervised by the Competent Authority. Authorisation should be granted only if standards equivalent to those provided for in this Directive are met. However, the important role played by existing European organ exchange organisations in the exchange of organs between the Member States and third countries participating in such organisations should be taken into account. It should also be possible for a blanket authorisation to be granted in respect of a third country or a procurement organisation located in a third country.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) T
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) This Directive should respect the fundamental rights and observe the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In line with that charter
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) This Directive should respect the fundamental rights and observe the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union11. In line with that charter and to take account of, as appropriate the Convention on human rights and biomedicine12, organ transplantation programmes should be founded on the principles of voluntary and unpaid donation, altruism of the living donor and solidarity between donor and recipient while ensuring anonymity of the deceased donor and the recipient(s).
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 a (new) (16a) The competent authority may consult the national Data Protection Authority in relation to developing a framework for the transfer of data concerning organs to and from third countries.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 b (new) (16b) As a general principle, the identity of the recipient(s) should not be disclosed to the donor or his/her family or vice versa, without prejudice to legislation in force in Member States which under specific conditions might allow such information to be made available to donor or donors' families and organ recipients, with the consent of both parties.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Article 8 of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 (17) Article 8 of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data13 prohibits in principle the processing of data concerning health. Limited exemptions to this prohibition principle are laid down. Directive 95/46/EC also requires the controller to implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to protect personal data against accidental or unlawful destruction or accidental loss, alteration, unauthorised disclosure or access and against all other unlawful forms of processing. In line with that Directive, strict confidentiality rules and security measures should be in place for the protection of the donors’ and the recipients’ personal data. Moreover, the competent authority may also consult the national Data Protection Authority in relation to developing a framework for the transfer of data concerning organs to and from third countries.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 21 (21) The measures needed to implement this Directive should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission16. With regard to Article 25 of this Directive, in all cases where implementing measures affecting data protection and security are considered, all relevant stakeholders should be consulted.
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 22 (22) In particular, power should be conferred on the Commission to lay down, where the organs concerned are to be exchanged between Member States, the procedures for the transmission to transplantation centres of the information on the characteristics of the donor and the organs, the procedures needed to ensure the traceability of the organs, including labelling requirements, and the procedures for the reporting of serious adverse events or reactions. Since these measures are of general scope and are designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, or to supplement this Directive with new non- essential elements, they must be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 This Directive lays down
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a directive Article 1 This Directive lays down rules to ensure
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. It shall apply also to parts of organs if it is their function to be used for the same purpose as the entire organ in the human body and to complex tissues.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point a (a)
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point a (a) ‘authorisation‘ means a
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point a a (new) aa) "competent authority means one (or more than one) non-profit authority, body, organisation and/or institution responsible for implementing the requirements of this Directive.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point a a (new) (aa) 'competent authority' means one or more than one non-profit authority, body, organisation and/or institution responsible for implementing the requirements of this Directive.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point c Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point c (c)
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point c (c) "donor" means every
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point d (d) ‘donation’ means
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point e (e)
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point f (f)
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point g (g) ‘organ’ means both a differentiated and vital part of the human body, formed by different tissues, that maintains its structure, vascularisation, and capacity to develop physiological functions with an important level of autonomy and parts of organs if it is their function to be used for the same purpose as the entire organ in the human body and complex tissues ;
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive Article 3 – point g (g) "organ" means both a differentiated and vital part of the human body, formed by different tissues, that maintains its structure, vascularisation, and capacity to
source: PE-439.155
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2957/COM_SEC(2008)2957_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2957/COM_SEC(2008)2957_EN.pdf |
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=18247&j=0&l=en
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2008&number=0238&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2008&number=0238&appLng=EN |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2957/COM_SEC(2008)2957_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/2957/COM_SEC(2008)2957_EN.pdf |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1036)(documentyear:2009)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1036)(documentyear:2009)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE430.898New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE430.898 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE430.861&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-430861_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE439.155New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE439.155 |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0106_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0106_EN.html |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=18247&j=0&l=en
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20100518&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20100518&type=CRE |
events/7 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/11/docs/3/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2010:243:TOCNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:243:SOM:EN:HTML |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/date |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/4/date |
|
committees/5/date |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-106&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0106_EN.html |
docs/7/body |
EC
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0123/COM_COM(2015)0123_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2015/0123/COM_COM(2015)0123_EN.pdf |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2010-106&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2010-0106_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-181New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0181_EN.html |
events/11/docs/3/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:243:SOM:EN:HTMLNew
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2010:243:TOC |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ENVI/7/00139New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32010L0053New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32010L0053 |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0818/COM_COM(2008)0818_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0818/COM_COM(2008)0818_EN.pdf |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|