BETA


2008/0239(COD) Marco Polo II programme: financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead TRAN STOCKMANN Ulrich (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion BUDG JENSEN Anne E. (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 071, EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 080-p2

Events

2009/10/09
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to amend Regulation (EC) 1692/2006 establishing Marco Polo II in order to facilitate participation by small and micro enterprises and simplify the Programme’s implementation and administrative procedures.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EC) No 923/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 establishing the second ‘Marco Polo’ programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system (Marco Polo II).

CONTENT: the Council adopted this Regulation amending Regulation (EC) 1692/2006 on the EU's Marco Polo II programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system, following an agreement reached with the European Parliament in first reading. The amendment to the Marco Polo II programme is intended to increase its effectiveness in terms of shifting cargo from road transport to transport by sea, inland waterway and rail. The new Regulation addresses problems encountered under the previous regulation in that a substantial part of the allocated budget has not been used.

Measures to facilitate the participation of small enterprises and micro-enterprises : the participation by small and micro enterprises in the Programme will be increased by allowing single undertakings to apply for funding and by lowering the eligibility thresholds for proposals submitted by inland waterway transport enterprises.

Lowering the action eligibility thresholds : the eligibility thresholds for proposals for funding will be lowered and expressed in terms of yearly tonne-kilometres shifted, except for common learning actions. Those thresholds will be computed over the entire implementation period of the actions referred to in the Annex, without setting any yearly rate of implementation. There is no further need for a specific threshold applying to traffic avoidance actions, and a minimum duration is established for this kind of action, catalyst actions and Motorways of the Sea actions.

Increasing the funding intensity : t he funding intensity is increased by introducing a definition for ‘freight’, in order to include the transport element in the calculation of the modal shift, and allowing exceptional extensions of the maximum duration for actions with start-up delays. The update of the funding intensity from EUR 1 to EUR 2 following the procedure set out in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 is reflected in the text of that Annex as amended.

Simplifying the programme's implementation and administrative procedures : in order to simplify the implementation of the Programme, Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 on funding conditions for ancillary infrastructure is deleted. Furthermore the committee procedure for the yearly selection of actions to be funded is eliminated. A more detailed link between the Programme and the Trans-European Transport Network setting out the framework for the Motorways of the Sea is established and the environmental considerations extended to include the whole external costs of the actions.

The Commission will present a Communication on the results achieved by the Marco Polo Programmes for the period 2003-2010. It shall do so before drawing up a proposal for a third Marco Polo Programme and shall take account of the Communication’s findings when drawing up that proposal.

The Communication shall in particular deal with the following:

the impact of this Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 923/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 establishing the second “Marco Polo” programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system (Marco Polo II), the experience of the Executive Agency for Competition and Innovation with programme management, the need to differentiate between transport modes with regard to the conditions for funding, on the basis of safety, environmental performance and energy efficiency, the effectiveness of traffic avoidance actions, the need to set up demand-driven assistance at the application stage, taking into account the needs of small and micro transport enterprises, the recognition of economic recession as an exceptional reason for extending the duration of actions, the lowering of the eligibility thresholds for product-specific actions, the possibility of indicating the targets for minimum funding thresholds for proposed actions in terms of energy efficiency and environmental benefits in addition to tonne-kilometres shifted, the appropriateness of including the transport unit in the definition of the term “freight”, the availability of complete yearly overviews of actions which have been co-financed, the possibility of ensuring consistency between the Programme, the Logistics Action Plan and the TEN-T by taking the appropriate measures in order to coordinate the allocation of community funds, in particular for Motorways of the Sea,

the possibility of making costs incurred in a third country eligible if the action is carried out by undertakings from a Member State.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 10/10/2009.

2009/09/16
   CSL - Draft final act
Documents
2009/09/16
   CSL - Final act signed
2009/09/16
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2009/07/27
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
2009/07/27
   CSL - Council Meeting
2009/06/25
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2009/04/23
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2009/04/23
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 581 votes to 7, with 5 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending, under the first reading of the codecision procedure, the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 establishing the second "Marco Polo" programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system ("Marco Polo II").

The amendments are the result of a compromise negotiated with the Council.

The main amendments are as follows:

Submission of actions : actions shall be submitted to the Commission in accordance with the detailed rules on the submission and selection procedure. Submissions shall contain all the information necessary to enable the Commission to make its selection.

If required, the Commission shall provide assistance to applicants to facilitate their application process, for instance by way of an online helpdesk .

The Commission shall, after having informed the committee referred to in the regulation, adopt the decision to grant financial assistance.

Communication : the Commission shall present to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions a Communication on the results achieved by the Marco Polo Programme for the period 2003-2010. It shall do so before drawing up a proposal for a third Marco Polo Programme and shall take account of the Communication's findings when drawing up the proposal. The Communication shall in particular deal with the following:

the impact of the future Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 establishing the second "Marco Polo" programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system ("Marco Polo II"); the experience of the Executive Agency for Competition and Innovation with programme management; the need to differentiate between transport modes in the conditions for funding, on the basis of safety, environmental performance and energy efficiency; the effectiveness of Traffic Avoidance Actions; the need to set up demand-driven assistance at the application stage, taking into account the needs of small and micro transport companies; the recognition of economic recession as an exceptional reason for extending the duration of projects; product-specific lowering of eligibility thresholds; the possibility of indicating the targets for minimum funding thresholds for proposed projects in terms of energy efficiency and environmental benefits in addition to tonne-kilometres shifted; the appropriateness of including the transport unit in the definition of the term "freight"; the availability of complete yearly overviews of projects which have been co-financed; the possibility of ensuring consistency between the Marco Polo Programme, the Logistics Action Plan and the TEN-T programme by taking the appropriate measures in order to coordinate the allocation of community funds, in particular for Motorways of the Sea; the possibility of making costs incurred in a third country eligible if promoted by undertakings from a Member State; the need to take into account the specific characteristics of the inland waterway sector and its small- and medium sized enterprises, for example by way of a dedicated programme for the inland waterway sector; the possibility of extending the programme to neighbouring countries; the possibility of further adapting the programme to the insular and archipelagic Member States.

Eligible costs : the eligible costs related to ancillary infrastructure shall not be higher than 20% of the total eligible costs for the project.

Motorways of the sea : the minimum indicative subsidy threshold per motorways of the sea action shall be 200 million tonne-kilometres, to be implemented over the entire life of the subsidy agreement.

Modal shift : the minimum indicative subsidy threshold per modal shift action shall be 60 million tonne-kilometres or its volumetric equivalent of modal shift per year, to be implemented over the entire life of the subsidy agreement. Modal shift actions aiming at implementing a shift to inland waterways will be subject to a special threshold of 13 million tonne-kilometres or its volumetric equivalent of modal shift per year.

Documents
2009/04/22
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2009/04/02
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2009/04/02
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Documents
2009/03/31
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
Details

The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report drawn up by Ulrich STOCKMANN (PES, DE), amending, under the first reading of codecision procedure, the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 establishing the second ‘Marco Polo’ programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system (‘Marco Polo II’).

The main amendments are as follows:

Online helpdesk : submissions shall contain all the information necessary to enable the Commission to make its selection. If required, the Commission shall provide assistance to applicants to facilitate their application process, for instance by way of an online helpdesk.

Marco Polo III : the Commission shall present a Communication (rather than an evaluation report) on the results achieved by the Marco Polo Programme for the period 2003-2010. It shall do so before drawing up a proposal for a third Marco Polo Programme and shall take account of the Communication’s findings when drawing up the proposal (rather than by 30 June 2011 as the Commission had proposed.)

Communication: the Communication should deal with the following:

the impact of Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 establishing the second “Marco Polo” programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system (“Marco Polo II”); the experience of the Executive Agency for Competition and Innovation with programme management; the need to differentiate between transport modes in the conditions for funding, on the basis of safety, environmental performance and energy efficiency; the effectiveness of Traffic Avoidance Actions; the need to set up demand-driven assistance at the application stage, taking into account the needs of small and micro transport companies; the recognition of economic recession as an exceptional reason for extending the duration of projects; product-specific lowering of eligibility thresholds; the possibility of indicating the targets for minimum funding thresholds for proposed projects in terms of energy efficiency and environmental benefits in addition to tonne-kilometres shifted; the appropriateness of including the transport unit in the definition of the term “freight”; the availability of complete yearly overviews of projects which have been co-financed; the possibility of ensuring consistency between the Marco Polo Programme, the Logistics Action Plan and the TEN-T programme by taking the appropriate measures in order to coordinate the allocation of community funds, in particular for Motorways of the Sea; the possibility of making costs incurred in a third country eligible if promoted by undertakings from a Member State; the need to take into account the specific characteristics of the inland waterway sector and its small- and medium sized enterprises, for example by way of a dedicated programme for the inland waterway sector; the possibility of extending the programme to the neighbouring countries; the possibility of further adapting the programme to the insular and archipelagic Member States.

Eligible costs: the eligible costs related to ancillary infrastructure shall not be higher than 20% (rather than 10%) of the total eligible costs for the project.

Contract value threshold : value thresholds for motorways of the sea and modal shift are amended.

2009/03/30
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Presidency briefed the Council on the state of play of the current discussions with the European Parliament on the Commission proposal on the second Marco Polo programme, which are aimed at reaching a first reading agreement.

Documents
2009/03/30
   CSL - Council Meeting
2009/03/24
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Documents
2009/03/04
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2009/02/23
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2009/01/28
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2009/01/21
   EP - JENSEN Anne E. (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2009/01/13
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2009/01/05
   EP - STOCKMANN Ulrich (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2008/12/10
   EC - Legislative proposal
Details

PURPOSE: to establish the second 'Marco Polo' programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system ('Marco Polo II'), and amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006.

PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

CONTENT: the Marco Polo programme is one of the instruments to reduce congestion as part of a coherent EU transport policy strategy which includes the internalisation of external costs and the use of market-based instruments to reflect the utilisation of infrastructure.

The external evaluation of the first Marco Polo programme estimates that 64% of the objective of tkm to be shifted off the road is being met. Therefore if no action is taken, in a context of decreasing proposals and successful projects, then the second Marco Polo programme will in the best case achieve the same percentage of success. This would imply missing the target of avoiding or shifting a substantial part of the estimated 60% growth of international freight transport by road, equivalent to 20.5 billion tonne-kilometres in absolute terms. This will have negative consequences in terms of additional road infrastructure costs, accidents, congestion, local and global pollution, environmental damage and unreliability of the supply chain and of logistics processes.

This rate of success is corroborated by the level of response to the second call under the second Marco Polo programme, which shows a marked decrease of the total proposed modal shift. Furthermore the new types of actions introduced by this second Programme, Motorways of the Sea and Traffic Avoidance, have not attracted enough applications (only 9% of the proposals in 2007 and 4% in 2008).

Two measures have already been taken to improve the Programme's results without any need for a change in the Regulation: the outsourcing of the management of the Programme to an Executive Agency which is expert in managing projects; and the doubling of the funding intensity for projects from EUR 1 to EUR 2 per 500 tkm shifted or avoided, so as to attract more projects.

But these measures will not be enough and a targeted revision of the Programme has been proposed, which will bring:

a further increase in the effectiveness of the programme; a more balanced distribution of community support among project types; a substantial simplification of the legal basis and the management of the Programme; a significant reduction of administrative costs to manage the programme; a positive effect in terms of benefits for peripheral areas and non-member countries.

The proposed amendments aim to increase the effectiveness of the Programme in terms of tonne-kilometres avoided or shifted off the roads, in order to achieve the goals set in the legal basis. The specific measures intend to stimulate applications for funding by increasing participation by small enterprises, particularly the Inland Waterway Transport companies, lowering the eligibility thresholds, increasing the grant intensity and simplifying the administrative processes of the Programme.

2008/12/10
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2008/12/10
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2008/12/09
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: to establish the second 'Marco Polo' programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system ('Marco Polo II'), and amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006.

PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

CONTENT: the Marco Polo programme is one of the instruments to reduce congestion as part of a coherent EU transport policy strategy which includes the internalisation of external costs and the use of market-based instruments to reflect the utilisation of infrastructure.

The external evaluation of the first Marco Polo programme estimates that 64% of the objective of tkm to be shifted off the road is being met. Therefore if no action is taken, in a context of decreasing proposals and successful projects, then the second Marco Polo programme will in the best case achieve the same percentage of success. This would imply missing the target of avoiding or shifting a substantial part of the estimated 60% growth of international freight transport by road, equivalent to 20.5 billion tonne-kilometres in absolute terms. This will have negative consequences in terms of additional road infrastructure costs, accidents, congestion, local and global pollution, environmental damage and unreliability of the supply chain and of logistics processes.

This rate of success is corroborated by the level of response to the second call under the second Marco Polo programme, which shows a marked decrease of the total proposed modal shift. Furthermore the new types of actions introduced by this second Programme, Motorways of the Sea and Traffic Avoidance, have not attracted enough applications (only 9% of the proposals in 2007 and 4% in 2008).

Two measures have already been taken to improve the Programme's results without any need for a change in the Regulation: the outsourcing of the management of the Programme to an Executive Agency which is expert in managing projects; and the doubling of the funding intensity for projects from EUR 1 to EUR 2 per 500 tkm shifted or avoided, so as to attract more projects.

But these measures will not be enough and a targeted revision of the Programme has been proposed, which will bring:

a further increase in the effectiveness of the programme; a more balanced distribution of community support among project types; a substantial simplification of the legal basis and the management of the Programme; a significant reduction of administrative costs to manage the programme; a positive effect in terms of benefits for peripheral areas and non-member countries.

The proposed amendments aim to increase the effectiveness of the Programme in terms of tonne-kilometres avoided or shifted off the roads, in order to achieve the goals set in the legal basis. The specific measures intend to stimulate applications for funding by increasing participation by small enterprises, particularly the Inland Waterway Transport companies, lowering the eligibility thresholds, increasing the grant intensity and simplifying the administrative processes of the Programme.

Documents

Votes

Rapport STOCKMANN A6-0217/2009 - AM 24 #

2009/04/23 Outcome: -: 407, +: 179, 0: 3
FI IT LV LT NL CY PL IE DK EE SI LU BG BE SE EL SK CZ AT PT HU RO ES GB FR DE
Total
12
43
4
10
21
3
32
12
12
6
5
5
15
23
15
16
10
20
18
20
19
27
35
60
58
88
icon: ALDE ALDE
74

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

1
2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

France Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: UEN UEN
28

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
9

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
21

Italy NI

2

Poland NI

1

Slovakia NI

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: PSE PSE
171

Finland PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
218

Finland PPE-DE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Netherlands PPE-DE

4

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Rapport STOCKMANN A6-0217/2009 - AM 28 #

2009/04/23 Outcome: +: 569, -: 15, 0: 8
DE GB FR IT ES PL RO NL BE HU PT EL CZ AT BG SE IE FI LT DK SK EE SI LU LV CY
Total
89
61
57
44
35
32
28
22
23
19
19
17
21
18
15
15
12
11
10
11
10
6
5
5
4
3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
219

Finland PPE-DE

2
2

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

1
icon: PSE PSE
175

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
74

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

France Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
28

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
9

United Kingdom IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

6

Italy NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

1

Belgium NI

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Slovakia NI

1

Rapport STOCKMANN A6-0217/2009 - résolution législative #

2009/04/23 Outcome: +: 581, -: 7, 0: 5
DE FR GB IT ES PL RO BE NL PT HU AT CZ BG EL SE IE DK FI LT SK EE SI LU LV CY
Total
89
59
62
45
35
32
26
23
21
20
19
18
19
15
17
15
12
12
11
10
10
6
5
5
4
3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
216

Denmark PPE-DE

1

Finland PPE-DE

2
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

1
icon: PSE PSE
176

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
73

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: UEN UEN
29

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2

Latvia UEN

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
22

United Kingdom NI

6

Italy NI

2

Poland NI

1

Austria NI

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
8

United Kingdom IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
32 2008/0239(COD)
2009/03/04 TRAN 32 amendments...
source: PE-420.162

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2008-12-10T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
docs/1
date
2008-12-10T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/2
date
2008-12-10T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3022/COM_SEC(2008)3022_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3022/COM_SEC(2008)3022_EN.pdf
docs/3
date
2009-02-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://nullEN&reference=PE419.939&secondRef=02 title: PE419.939
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4
date
2009-02-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://nullEN&reference=PE419.939&secondRef=02 title: PE419.939
committee
BUDG
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE419.939&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-419939_EN.html
events/0/date
Old
2008-12-10T00:00:00
New
2008-12-09T00:00:00
links/National parliaments/url
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2008&number=0239&appLng=EN
New
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2008&number=0239&appLng=EN
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE418.255
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE418.255
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE419.939&secondRef=02
New
http://nullEN&reference=PE419.939&secondRef=02
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE420.162
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE420.162
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0623)(documentyear:2009)(documentlanguage:EN)
New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0623)(documentyear:2009)(documentlanguage:EN)
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0217_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0217_EN.html
docs/7/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=17093&j=0&l=en
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0847/COM_COM(2008)0847(COR1)_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0847/COM_COM(2008)0847_EN.pdf
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading
events/4
date
2009-04-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0217_EN.html title: A6-0217/2009
events/4
date
2009-04-02T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0217_EN.html title: A6-0217/2009
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090422&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090422&type=CRE
events/7
date
2009-04-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0284_EN.html title: T6-0284/2009
summary
events/7
date
2009-04-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0284_EN.html title: T6-0284/2009
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
rapporteur
name: STOCKMANN Ulrich date: 2009-01-05T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2009-01-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: STOCKMANN Ulrich group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: JENSEN Anne E. date: 2009-01-21T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2009-01-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: JENSEN Anne E. group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-217&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0217_EN.html
docs/7/body
EC
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-217&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0217_EN.html
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-284
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0284_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2008-12-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0847/COM_COM(2008)0847_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0847 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52008PC0847:EN body: EC commission: DG: Energy and Transport Commissioner: TAJANI Antonio type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2009-01-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2009-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E. body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PSE name: STOCKMANN Ulrich
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2935 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2935*&MEET_DATE=30/03/2009 type: Debate in Council title: 2935 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2009-03-30T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2009-03-31T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2009-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E. body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PSE name: STOCKMANN Ulrich type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-04-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-217&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0217/2009 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2009-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E. body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PSE name: STOCKMANN Ulrich type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-04-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090422&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-04-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=17093&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-284 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0284/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-07-27T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2957
  • date: 2009-07-27T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
  • date: 2009-09-16T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2009-09-16T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2009-10-09T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R0923 title: Regulation 2009/923 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:266:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ L 266 09.10.2009, p. 0001
commission
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2009-01-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: STOCKMANN Ulrich group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2009-01-21T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E.
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2009-01-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: JENSEN Anne E. group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
TRAN
date
2009-01-05T00:00:00
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
rapporteur
group: PSE name: STOCKMANN Ulrich
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2957 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2957*&MEET_DATE=27/07/2009 date: 2009-07-27T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2935 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2935*&MEET_DATE=30/03/2009 date: 2009-03-30T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2008-12-10T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=3021 title: EUR-Lex title: SEC(2008)3021 type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2008-12-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3022/COM_SEC(2008)3022_EN.pdf title: SEC(2008)3022 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=3022 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2009-01-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE418.255 title: PE418.255 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2009-02-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE419.939&secondRef=02 title: PE419.939 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2009-03-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE420.162 title: PE420.162 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2009-03-24T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0623)(documentyear:2009)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES0623/2009 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
  • date: 2009-04-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-217&language=EN title: A6-0217/2009 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-06-25T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=17093&j=0&l=en title: SP(2009)3507 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2009-09-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=[%n4]%2F09&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 03660/2009/LEX type: Draft final act body: CSL
events
  • date: 2008-12-10T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0847/COM_COM(2008)0847(COR1)_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0847 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=847 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to establish the second 'Marco Polo' programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system ('Marco Polo II'), and amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006. PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. CONTENT: the Marco Polo programme is one of the instruments to reduce congestion as part of a coherent EU transport policy strategy which includes the internalisation of external costs and the use of market-based instruments to reflect the utilisation of infrastructure. The external evaluation of the first Marco Polo programme estimates that 64% of the objective of tkm to be shifted off the road is being met. Therefore if no action is taken, in a context of decreasing proposals and successful projects, then the second Marco Polo programme will in the best case achieve the same percentage of success. This would imply missing the target of avoiding or shifting a substantial part of the estimated 60% growth of international freight transport by road, equivalent to 20.5 billion tonne-kilometres in absolute terms. This will have negative consequences in terms of additional road infrastructure costs, accidents, congestion, local and global pollution, environmental damage and unreliability of the supply chain and of logistics processes. This rate of success is corroborated by the level of response to the second call under the second Marco Polo programme, which shows a marked decrease of the total proposed modal shift. Furthermore the new types of actions introduced by this second Programme, Motorways of the Sea and Traffic Avoidance, have not attracted enough applications (only 9% of the proposals in 2007 and 4% in 2008). Two measures have already been taken to improve the Programme's results without any need for a change in the Regulation: the outsourcing of the management of the Programme to an Executive Agency which is expert in managing projects; and the doubling of the funding intensity for projects from EUR 1 to EUR 2 per 500 tkm shifted or avoided, so as to attract more projects. But these measures will not be enough and a targeted revision of the Programme has been proposed, which will bring: a further increase in the effectiveness of the programme; a more balanced distribution of community support among project types; a substantial simplification of the legal basis and the management of the Programme; a significant reduction of administrative costs to manage the programme; a positive effect in terms of benefits for peripheral areas and non-member countries. The proposed amendments aim to increase the effectiveness of the Programme in terms of tonne-kilometres avoided or shifted off the roads, in order to achieve the goals set in the legal basis. The specific measures intend to stimulate applications for funding by increasing participation by small enterprises, particularly the Inland Waterway Transport companies, lowering the eligibility thresholds, increasing the grant intensity and simplifying the administrative processes of the Programme.
  • date: 2009-01-13T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-03-30T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2935*&MEET_DATE=30/03/2009 title: 2935 summary: The Presidency briefed the Council on the state of play of the current discussions with the European Parliament on the Commission proposal on the second Marco Polo programme, which are aimed at reaching a first reading agreement.
  • date: 2009-03-31T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report drawn up by Ulrich STOCKMANN (PES, DE), amending, under the first reading of codecision procedure, the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 establishing the second ‘Marco Polo’ programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system (‘Marco Polo II’). The main amendments are as follows: Online helpdesk : submissions shall contain all the information necessary to enable the Commission to make its selection. If required, the Commission shall provide assistance to applicants to facilitate their application process, for instance by way of an online helpdesk. Marco Polo III : the Commission shall present a Communication (rather than an evaluation report) on the results achieved by the Marco Polo Programme for the period 2003-2010. It shall do so before drawing up a proposal for a third Marco Polo Programme and shall take account of the Communication’s findings when drawing up the proposal (rather than by 30 June 2011 as the Commission had proposed.) Communication: the Communication should deal with the following: the impact of Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 establishing the second “Marco Polo” programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system (“Marco Polo II”); the experience of the Executive Agency for Competition and Innovation with programme management; the need to differentiate between transport modes in the conditions for funding, on the basis of safety, environmental performance and energy efficiency; the effectiveness of Traffic Avoidance Actions; the need to set up demand-driven assistance at the application stage, taking into account the needs of small and micro transport companies; the recognition of economic recession as an exceptional reason for extending the duration of projects; product-specific lowering of eligibility thresholds; the possibility of indicating the targets for minimum funding thresholds for proposed projects in terms of energy efficiency and environmental benefits in addition to tonne-kilometres shifted; the appropriateness of including the transport unit in the definition of the term “freight”; the availability of complete yearly overviews of projects which have been co-financed; the possibility of ensuring consistency between the Marco Polo Programme, the Logistics Action Plan and the TEN-T programme by taking the appropriate measures in order to coordinate the allocation of community funds, in particular for Motorways of the Sea; the possibility of making costs incurred in a third country eligible if promoted by undertakings from a Member State; the need to take into account the specific characteristics of the inland waterway sector and its small- and medium sized enterprises, for example by way of a dedicated programme for the inland waterway sector; the possibility of extending the programme to the neighbouring countries; the possibility of further adapting the programme to the insular and archipelagic Member States. Eligible costs: the eligible costs related to ancillary infrastructure shall not be higher than 20% (rather than 10%) of the total eligible costs for the project. Contract value threshold : value thresholds for motorways of the sea and modal shift are amended.
  • date: 2009-04-02T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-217&language=EN title: A6-0217/2009
  • date: 2009-04-22T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090422&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-04-23T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=17093&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-04-23T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-284 title: T6-0284/2009 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 581 votes to 7, with 5 abstentions, a legislative resolution amending, under the first reading of the codecision procedure, the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 establishing the second "Marco Polo" programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system ("Marco Polo II"). The amendments are the result of a compromise negotiated with the Council. The main amendments are as follows: Submission of actions : actions shall be submitted to the Commission in accordance with the detailed rules on the submission and selection procedure. Submissions shall contain all the information necessary to enable the Commission to make its selection. If required, the Commission shall provide assistance to applicants to facilitate their application process, for instance by way of an online helpdesk . The Commission shall, after having informed the committee referred to in the regulation, adopt the decision to grant financial assistance. Communication : the Commission shall present to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions a Communication on the results achieved by the Marco Polo Programme for the period 2003-2010. It shall do so before drawing up a proposal for a third Marco Polo Programme and shall take account of the Communication's findings when drawing up the proposal. The Communication shall in particular deal with the following: the impact of the future Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 establishing the second "Marco Polo" programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system ("Marco Polo II"); the experience of the Executive Agency for Competition and Innovation with programme management; the need to differentiate between transport modes in the conditions for funding, on the basis of safety, environmental performance and energy efficiency; the effectiveness of Traffic Avoidance Actions; the need to set up demand-driven assistance at the application stage, taking into account the needs of small and micro transport companies; the recognition of economic recession as an exceptional reason for extending the duration of projects; product-specific lowering of eligibility thresholds; the possibility of indicating the targets for minimum funding thresholds for proposed projects in terms of energy efficiency and environmental benefits in addition to tonne-kilometres shifted; the appropriateness of including the transport unit in the definition of the term "freight"; the availability of complete yearly overviews of projects which have been co-financed; the possibility of ensuring consistency between the Marco Polo Programme, the Logistics Action Plan and the TEN-T programme by taking the appropriate measures in order to coordinate the allocation of community funds, in particular for Motorways of the Sea; the possibility of making costs incurred in a third country eligible if promoted by undertakings from a Member State; the need to take into account the specific characteristics of the inland waterway sector and its small- and medium sized enterprises, for example by way of a dedicated programme for the inland waterway sector; the possibility of extending the programme to neighbouring countries; the possibility of further adapting the programme to the insular and archipelagic Member States. Eligible costs : the eligible costs related to ancillary infrastructure shall not be higher than 20% of the total eligible costs for the project. Motorways of the sea : the minimum indicative subsidy threshold per motorways of the sea action shall be 200 million tonne-kilometres, to be implemented over the entire life of the subsidy agreement. Modal shift : the minimum indicative subsidy threshold per modal shift action shall be 60 million tonne-kilometres or its volumetric equivalent of modal shift per year, to be implemented over the entire life of the subsidy agreement. Modal shift actions aiming at implementing a shift to inland waterways will be subject to a special threshold of 13 million tonne-kilometres or its volumetric equivalent of modal shift per year.
  • date: 2009-07-27T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2009-09-16T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL
  • date: 2009-09-16T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2009-10-09T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to amend Regulation (EC) 1692/2006 establishing Marco Polo II in order to facilitate participation by small and micro enterprises and simplify the Programme’s implementation and administrative procedures. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EC) No 923/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 establishing the second ‘Marco Polo’ programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system (Marco Polo II). CONTENT: the Council adopted this Regulation amending Regulation (EC) 1692/2006 on the EU's Marco Polo II programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system, following an agreement reached with the European Parliament in first reading. The amendment to the Marco Polo II programme is intended to increase its effectiveness in terms of shifting cargo from road transport to transport by sea, inland waterway and rail. The new Regulation addresses problems encountered under the previous regulation in that a substantial part of the allocated budget has not been used. Measures to facilitate the participation of small enterprises and micro-enterprises : the participation by small and micro enterprises in the Programme will be increased by allowing single undertakings to apply for funding and by lowering the eligibility thresholds for proposals submitted by inland waterway transport enterprises. Lowering the action eligibility thresholds : the eligibility thresholds for proposals for funding will be lowered and expressed in terms of yearly tonne-kilometres shifted, except for common learning actions. Those thresholds will be computed over the entire implementation period of the actions referred to in the Annex, without setting any yearly rate of implementation. There is no further need for a specific threshold applying to traffic avoidance actions, and a minimum duration is established for this kind of action, catalyst actions and Motorways of the Sea actions. Increasing the funding intensity : t he funding intensity is increased by introducing a definition for ‘freight’, in order to include the transport element in the calculation of the modal shift, and allowing exceptional extensions of the maximum duration for actions with start-up delays. The update of the funding intensity from EUR 1 to EUR 2 following the procedure set out in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 is reflected in the text of that Annex as amended. Simplifying the programme's implementation and administrative procedures : in order to simplify the implementation of the Programme, Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 on funding conditions for ancillary infrastructure is deleted. Furthermore the committee procedure for the yearly selection of actions to be funded is eliminated. A more detailed link between the Programme and the Trans-European Transport Network setting out the framework for the Motorways of the Sea is established and the environmental considerations extended to include the whole external costs of the actions. The Commission will present a Communication on the results achieved by the Marco Polo Programmes for the period 2003-2010. It shall do so before drawing up a proposal for a third Marco Polo Programme and shall take account of the Communication’s findings when drawing up that proposal. The Communication shall in particular deal with the following: the impact of this Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 923/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 establishing the second “Marco Polo” programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system (Marco Polo II), the experience of the Executive Agency for Competition and Innovation with programme management, the need to differentiate between transport modes with regard to the conditions for funding, on the basis of safety, environmental performance and energy efficiency, the effectiveness of traffic avoidance actions, the need to set up demand-driven assistance at the application stage, taking into account the needs of small and micro transport enterprises, the recognition of economic recession as an exceptional reason for extending the duration of actions, the lowering of the eligibility thresholds for product-specific actions, the possibility of indicating the targets for minimum funding thresholds for proposed actions in terms of energy efficiency and environmental benefits in addition to tonne-kilometres shifted, the appropriateness of including the transport unit in the definition of the term “freight”, the availability of complete yearly overviews of actions which have been co-financed, the possibility of ensuring consistency between the Programme, the Logistics Action Plan and the TEN-T by taking the appropriate measures in order to coordinate the allocation of community funds, in particular for Motorways of the Sea, the possibility of making costs incurred in a third country eligible if the action is carried out by undertakings from a Member State. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 10/10/2009. docs: title: Regulation 2009/923 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R0923 title: OJ L 266 09.10.2009, p. 0001 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:266:SOM:EN:HTML
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
TRAN/6/71297
New
  • TRAN/6/71297
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R0923
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R0923
procedure/instrument
Old
Regulation
New
  • Regulation
  • Amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 2004/0157(COD)
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.20.07 Combined transport, multimodal transport
  • 3.70.02 Atmospheric pollution, motor vehicle pollution
  • 8.70.60 Previous annual budgets
New
3.20.07
Combined transport, multimodal transport
3.70.02
Atmospheric pollution, motor vehicle pollution
8.70.60
Previous annual budgets
procedure/summary
  • Amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
545fc57fd1d1c5099c000000
activities/3/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
545fc57fd1d1c5099c000000
activities/4/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
545fc57fd1d1c5099c000000
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
545fc57fd1d1c5099c000000
activities
  • date: 2008-12-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0847/COM_COM(2008)0847_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0847 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52008PC0847:EN body: EC type: Legislative proposal published commission: DG: Energy and Transport Commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
  • date: 2009-01-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2009-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E. body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PSE name: STOCKMANN Ulrich
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2935 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2935*&MEET_DATE=30/03/2009 type: Debate in Council title: 2935 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2009-03-30T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2009-03-31T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2009-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E. body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PSE name: STOCKMANN Ulrich type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-04-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-217&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A6-0217/2009 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2009-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E. body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PSE name: STOCKMANN Ulrich type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-04-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090422&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-04-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=17093&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-284 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0284/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-07-27T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2957
  • date: 2009-07-27T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
  • date: 2009-09-16T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 2009-09-16T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2009-10-09T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32009R0923 title: Regulation 2009/923 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:266:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ L 266 09.10.2009, p. 0001
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2009-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: ALDE name: JENSEN Anne E.
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: TRAN date: 2009-01-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: PSE name: STOCKMANN Ulrich
links
National parliaments
European Commission
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: TAJANI Antonio
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
TRAN/6/71297
reference
2008/0239(COD)
subtype
Legislation
legal_basis
stage_reached
Procedure completed
summary
Amending Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006
instrument
Regulation
title
Marco Polo II programme: financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system
type
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
final
subject