Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | ORTUONDO LARREA Josu ( ALDE) | |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | PRIBETICH Pierre ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | ECON |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 572 votes to 12, with 10 abstentions, a resolution on a European ports policy, in response to the Commission’s communication on this issue.
The own initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Josu ORTUONDO LARREA (ALDE, ES) on behalf of the Committee on Transport and Tourism.
MEPs welcome the Commission’s communication. They recall the crucial importance of the ports sector to the European Union from the economic, commercial, social, environmental and strategic points of view and consider that the Commission's role is important in order to ensure that all European ports are able to reach their full potential. MEPs believe that the European ports policy should promote the following four principles: safety, swift service, low cost, and respect for the environment.
Environment : MEPs welcome the Commission's intention to publish guidelines on the application of Community environmental legislation to port development and their infrastructure and call on it to publish these guidelines before the end of 2008. The Commission and the Member States are urged to support the proposals to replace the current fuel with diesel by 2020 as well as the possibility of including the maritime sector in the emissions trading scheme. MEPs also call on the Commission and the sector to encourage shipping companies to reduce the number of empty containers transported. Lastly, they believe that possible investments by public authorities to develop ports must not be seen as State aid where they are directly intended for environmental improvements or decongestion and reducing the use of roads for freight transport.
Multimodality : MEPs consider that maritime and river transport cannot be considered in isolation from land and air transport and that links to a port's hinterland are of great importance to its commercial success. They underline the need to establish interconnections between ports and consider that the co-modal participation of ports is needed in relation to both the trans-European transport networks (TEN-Ts) and the future Community green corridors. Stressing the social and cultural role played by ports for the population of the hinterland, MEPs support the intention of the Commission to evaluate ports’ hinterland connections status and needs and their impact on a balanced network of traffic flows on the occasion of the mid-term review of the TEN-T in 2010. In this context, the Commission and the Member States are called upon to promote cooperation between European ports.
New technologies : MEPs consider that new technologies, particularly information technologies, are key elements that will enable European ports to increase their efficiency and profitability. They call on the Commission to systematically monitor the development of new technologies and management methods used internationally at ports and ship service, freight, passenger and land transport terminals. The Commission and the Member States are invited to hasten the implementation of remote pilotage systems and to support research into safety issues, so as to keep accidents to a minimum and to improve the use of space in ports, and into environmental questions, so as to curb CO2 emissions and pollution caused by waste. Regarding the technological changes needed for the development of intermediate ports, MEPs consider that the regions concerned should be entitled to draw on the European Structural Funds, particularly to finance the acquisition of advanced technological installations, to create jobs in innovative fields, and to rehabilitate urban areas freed up by the transfer of port business to out-of-town areas.
Cooperation and international aspects : MEPs draw attention to the territorial dimension of the development of European ports, particularly the need for cross-border cooperation and coordination between neighbouring port regions. They highlight the importance of the European Neighbourhood Policy and the regional strategy for the Mediterranean, Baltic and Black Seas. The resolution encourages the use of European territorial cooperation programmes under the cohesion policy and cooperation programmes under the EU neighbourhood and enlargement policy. The Commission, the Member States and the relevant regional authorities are invited to employ a trans-border approach to the use of existing capacity when co-financing port infrastructure.
Competitiveness : MEPs welcome the Commission's intention to conduct a survey of the problems encountered by European ports in terms of competitiveness and costs. They invite the Commission to tackle problems generated by competition with non-EU ports and anti-competitive and discriminatory measures taken by EU neighbouring countries. MEPs also welcome the Commission's intention to submit a legislative proposal on creating a barrier-free European maritime transport area in order to ensure fair competition between maritime transport and land transport in the Union. In this context, they recommend that Community-cleared goods should be exempt from customs controls in short-sea shipping in the Community and advocate the creation of separate port zones for intra-community and international traffic, together with simplification of internal transport, standardisation and identification of special containers. The Commission is called upon to publish guidelines for State aid to ports in 2008.
Social dialogue : MEPs call for a European social dialogue committee to be set up and consider that it should deal with subjects related to ports, including workers' rights, concessions and the 1979 International Labour Organisation Convention No 152 on occupational safety and health (dock work). The resolution stresses the importance of protecting and securing the highest possible level of training for port workers and proposes that the topic of professional qualifications and lifelong training be addressed together with the social partners within the future European social dialogue committee.
Scanning US-bound cargo : the resolution urges the Commission to continue its efforts to ensure that the US regulatio n to scan 100% of US-bound cargo is changed. It calls on the Commission to evaluate the potential costs of this measure to business and to the EU economy, as well as its potential impact on customs operations.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the own initiative report by Josu ORTUONDO LARREA (ALDE, ES), warmly welcoming the Commission’s communication on a European ports policy.
MEPs recall the crucial importance of the ports sector to the European Union from the economic, commercial, social, environmental and strategic points of view. They welcome the Commission’s intention to publish guidelines on the application of Community environmental legislation to port development and their infrastructure and urge the Commission to publish these guidelines before the end of 2008. The aim of these guidelines should be to tackle the legal uncertainty deriving from certain environmental directives.
The resolution also stresses the need to develop an integrated European policy to boost regional competitiveness and territorial cohesion, taking account of social, environmental, economic and security aspects at all territorial levels, by organising interinstitutional, intersectoral and multi-territory partnerships. MEPs highlight the territorial dimension of the development of European ports, particularly the need for cross-border cooperation and coordination between neighbouring port regions.
Stressing the social and cultural role of ports for the population of the hinterland , MEPs call on the regional authorities concerned to implement a more multimodal transport policy to ensure that, in addition to motorways, more traffic goes by rail and internal waterways, to connect port areas effectively with the TEN-Ts and to give ports more effective hinterland connections, in particular through the use of railways and inland waterways.
The European Commission is called upon to systematically monitor the development of new technologies and management methods used internationally at ports and ship service, freight, passenger and land transport terminals. MEPs consider that the regions concerned should be entitled to draw on the structural funds, particularly to finance the acquisition of advanced technological installations, to create jobs in innovative fields and to rehabilitate urban areas freed up by the transfer of port business to out-of-town areas.
The Commission and the Member States are called upon, inter alia, to:
promote cooperation between European ports; hasten the implementation of remote pilotage systems in order to increase efficiency and security in traffic management in ports as well as in roadstead areas; support research into safety issues, so as to keep accidents to a minimum and to improve the use of space in ports, and into environmental questions, so as to curb CO2 emissions and pollution caused by waste.
MEPs welcome the Commission’s intention to conduct a survey of the problems encountered by European ports in terms of competitiveness and costs. They call on the Commission to consider compiling a log of these problems, so as to specifically tackle problems generated by competition with non-EU ports and anti-competitive and discriminatory measures taken by EU neighbouring countries.
MEPs also welcome the Commission's intention to submit a legislative proposal on creating a barrier-free European maritime transport area in order to ensure fair competition between maritime transport and land transport in the Union. In this context, they recommend that Community-cleared goods should be exempt from customs controls in short-sea shipping in the Community and advocate the creation of separate port zones for intra-community and international traffic, together with simplification of internal transport, standardisation and identification of special containers.
Lastly, the Commission is called upon to publish guidelines for State aid to ports in 2008. These guidelines should cover the port area as such, with a distinction made between access and defence infrastructure, project-related infrastructure and superstructure and with no distinction made between different categories of ports.
PURPOSE: to set out a European Ports Policy.
BACKGROUND: more than 1 200 merchant ports dot some 100 000 km of European coasts. Several hundred others punctuate the 36 000 km of our inland waterways. They are key points of modal transfer and are of vital interest to handle 90% of Europe's international trade. They are essential for the development of short sea shipping and, in many cases, of inland waterways' traffic. Ports are a direct and in-direct source of more than half a million jobs, and ensure dynamism and development of whole regions including most peripheral ones.
CONTENT: the present Communication aims at a performing EU port system able to cope with the future challenges of EU transport needs; it sets an action plan for the European Commission. It follows up from an extensive consultation with the stakeholders in 2006-2007. It follows up the recently adopted Communication on an Integrated Maritime Policy (see INI/2008/2009 ).
Ports face the following challenges:
An increase in the demand for low cost international transport; A major technological change, marked by the development of container transport and cleaner operation of ports, but for which a major adaptation effort in land acquisition and management, as well as in technology and social issues is required; The commitment to reduce greenhouse gases which calls for a decrease in harmful emissions and road congestion effects, as well as for modal diversification towards rail, inland navigation and maritime transport; The need to develop a recurrent dialogue on performance and development of ports between port stakeholders and within the city, the region, and beyond; The need to reconcile ports' development and management with transparency, competition, and, in general, the Community set of rules.
The Commission suggests several ways to overcome these challenges and calls on all public and private stakeholders to support this approach:
Improve port performance and hinterland connections: the Commission intends, at this stage, to leave this matter to regional and national authorities and to the market. It intends to evaluate the status and needs of ports’ hinterland connections and their impact on the balance of traffic flows, during the mid-term review of the trans-European transport network in 2010.
Expanding capacity while respecting the environment: the Commission will issue guidelines on the application of the Community environment legislation to port development. Directive 2000/59/EC, on port reception facilities, aims at reducing discharges of ship-generated waste and cargo residues into the sea. The Commission will consult the interested parties on means to improve the existing mechanism of the Directive and to come forward with an appropriate proposal. Finally, the Commission is committed to reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from shipping and will contribute to establishing measures aimed at reducing these emissions in ports, including through appropriate incentives.
Modernising ports: In order to simplify the short sea shipping procedures, the Commission has proposed the creation of a paperless environment for customs and trade. It will present a legislative proposal on the creation of a European Maritime Transport Space without Barriers in 2008. The Commission intends to publish in 2009 a policy document on the deployment of "e-maritime". Finally, the EU Research Framework Programmes, in particular FP7, support relevant research and innovation on port infrastructure and operations.
Increasing clarity for investors and users: The Commission will adopt guidelines on State aid to ports in 2008. It plans to take measures towards extending the provisions on transparency of Directive 2006/111/EC to all merchant ports, irrespective of their annual turnover. Finally, the Commission will help disseminate best practices on transparency in port charges and will make an inventory of the problems encountered with a view to addressing them in Community external relations when needed.
Establishing a structured dialogue between ports and cities: the Commission will examine possible sources of finance for supporting improved integration of ports with cities. It also considers assessing the impact of security measures and providing guidance on how to reconcile the need for sound security measures with a fair degree of openness and accessibility to port areas. The review of legislation on maritime and port security will provide an opportunity to assess port access requirements and to examine the development of a European model for multi purpose access cards.
Work in ports: the Commission will encourage the establishment of a European sectoral social dialogue committee in ports within the meaning of Commission Decision 98/500/EC. If such a committee is established, the Commission will promote an active contribution of the social partners to management of change, modernisation and more and better jobs. The Commission will also propose a mutually recognisable framework on training of port workers in different fields of port activities. Finally, it will closely monitor the implementation, in ports, of Community rules on the health and safety of workers at work.
PURPOSE: to set out a European Ports Policy.
BACKGROUND: more than 1 200 merchant ports dot some 100 000 km of European coasts. Several hundred others punctuate the 36 000 km of our inland waterways. They are key points of modal transfer and are of vital interest to handle 90% of Europe's international trade. They are essential for the development of short sea shipping and, in many cases, of inland waterways' traffic. Ports are a direct and in-direct source of more than half a million jobs, and ensure dynamism and development of whole regions including most peripheral ones.
CONTENT: the present Communication aims at a performing EU port system able to cope with the future challenges of EU transport needs; it sets an action plan for the European Commission. It follows up from an extensive consultation with the stakeholders in 2006-2007. It follows up the recently adopted Communication on an Integrated Maritime Policy (see INI/2008/2009 ).
Ports face the following challenges:
An increase in the demand for low cost international transport; A major technological change, marked by the development of container transport and cleaner operation of ports, but for which a major adaptation effort in land acquisition and management, as well as in technology and social issues is required; The commitment to reduce greenhouse gases which calls for a decrease in harmful emissions and road congestion effects, as well as for modal diversification towards rail, inland navigation and maritime transport; The need to develop a recurrent dialogue on performance and development of ports between port stakeholders and within the city, the region, and beyond; The need to reconcile ports' development and management with transparency, competition, and, in general, the Community set of rules.
The Commission suggests several ways to overcome these challenges and calls on all public and private stakeholders to support this approach:
Improve port performance and hinterland connections: the Commission intends, at this stage, to leave this matter to regional and national authorities and to the market. It intends to evaluate the status and needs of ports’ hinterland connections and their impact on the balance of traffic flows, during the mid-term review of the trans-European transport network in 2010.
Expanding capacity while respecting the environment: the Commission will issue guidelines on the application of the Community environment legislation to port development. Directive 2000/59/EC, on port reception facilities, aims at reducing discharges of ship-generated waste and cargo residues into the sea. The Commission will consult the interested parties on means to improve the existing mechanism of the Directive and to come forward with an appropriate proposal. Finally, the Commission is committed to reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from shipping and will contribute to establishing measures aimed at reducing these emissions in ports, including through appropriate incentives.
Modernising ports: In order to simplify the short sea shipping procedures, the Commission has proposed the creation of a paperless environment for customs and trade. It will present a legislative proposal on the creation of a European Maritime Transport Space without Barriers in 2008. The Commission intends to publish in 2009 a policy document on the deployment of "e-maritime". Finally, the EU Research Framework Programmes, in particular FP7, support relevant research and innovation on port infrastructure and operations.
Increasing clarity for investors and users: The Commission will adopt guidelines on State aid to ports in 2008. It plans to take measures towards extending the provisions on transparency of Directive 2006/111/EC to all merchant ports, irrespective of their annual turnover. Finally, the Commission will help disseminate best practices on transparency in port charges and will make an inventory of the problems encountered with a view to addressing them in Community external relations when needed.
Establishing a structured dialogue between ports and cities: the Commission will examine possible sources of finance for supporting improved integration of ports with cities. It also considers assessing the impact of security measures and providing guidance on how to reconcile the need for sound security measures with a fair degree of openness and accessibility to port areas. The review of legislation on maritime and port security will provide an opportunity to assess port access requirements and to examine the development of a European model for multi purpose access cards.
Work in ports: the Commission will encourage the establishment of a European sectoral social dialogue committee in ports within the meaning of Commission Decision 98/500/EC. If such a committee is established, the Commission will promote an active contribution of the social partners to management of change, modernisation and more and better jobs. The Commission will also propose a mutually recognisable framework on training of port workers in different fields of port activities. Finally, it will closely monitor the implementation, in ports, of Community rules on the health and safety of workers at work.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)6486
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)6073
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0408/2008
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0308/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0308/2008
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE407.658
- Committee draft report: PE404.591
- Committee opinion: PE400.699
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2007)0616
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)1339
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)1340
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2007)0616
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2007)0616 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)1339 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2007)1340 EUR-Lex
- Committee opinion: PE400.699
- Committee draft report: PE404.591
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE407.658
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0308/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)6073
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)6486
Activities
- Michael CRAMER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Freight transport in Europe (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Freight transport in Europe (debate)
- Mechtild ROTHE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Freight transport in Europe (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Freight transport in Europe (debate)
- Inés AYALA SENDER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Freight transport in Europe (debate)
- Johannes BLOKLAND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Freight transport in Europe (debate)
- Gábor HARANGOZÓ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Freight transport in Europe (debate)
- Georg JARZEMBOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Freight transport in Europe (debate)
- Erik MEIJER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Freight transport in Europe (debate)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Freight transport in Europe (debate)
Votes
Rapport Ortuondo Larrea A6-0308/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
99 |
2008/2007(INI)
2008/03/07
REGI
20 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Supports the Commission’s intention to assist European ports in their efforts to modernise while respecting the environment, through guidelines which provide incentives
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the regional authorities concerned to implement a more multimodal transport policy to ensure that, in addition to motorways, more traffic goes by rail and internal waterways and to give ports more effective hinterland connections, in particular through the use of railways and inland waterways; calls on the Commission to make use of the 2010 mid-term review to create more resources for links between ports and their hinterland; notes that the significant increase in container traffic to be expected by 2010 will engender a parallel increase in the use of intermediate ports that are closer to the end user, thus reducing road traffic, which is a real source of conflict with local authorities;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the regional authorities concerned to implement a multimodal transport policy to give ports effective hinterland connections, in particular through the use of railways and inland waterways;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the regional authorities concerned to implement a multimodal transport policy to give ports effective hinterland connections, in particular through the use of railways and inland waterways; stresses, accordingly, the desirability of connecting port areas with the trans-European transport networks; notes that the significant increase in container traffic to be expected by 2010 will engender a parallel increase in the use of intermediate ports that are closer to the end user, thus reducing road traffic, which is a real source of conflict with local authorities;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the regional authorities concerned to implement a multimodal transport policy to give ports effective hinterland connections, in particular through the use of railways and inland waterways; in this connection recalls that the straightening of waterways can increase the risk of flooding and should therefore be avoided; notes that the significant increase in container traffic to be expected by 2010 will engender a parallel increase in the use of intermediate ports that are closer to the end user, thus reducing road traffic, which is a real source of conflict with local
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4a (nouveau) 4a. Emphasises that a more balanced port infrastructure policy for the whole of the territory of the EU could help reduce road freight;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the need to involve port and local authorities in drawing up plans to manage the water quality of river basins and maritime ports; draws attention to the need for regional authorities to
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the need to involve port and local authorities in drawing up plans to manage the water quality of river basins and maritime ports; draws attention to the need for regional authorities to ensure that ships and other modes of transport both on land and by air reduce their CO2 emissions into the air
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the need to involve port and local authorities in drawing up plans to manage the water quality of river basins and maritime ports in accordance with the Water Framework Directive 2006/60/EC; draws attention to the need for regional authorities to ensure, by laying down air quality management plans, that ships and other modes of transport on land reduce their CO2 emissions into the air, in accordance with the Marpol Convention and the Air Quality Framework Directive 96/62/EC; considers that these plans should include measures to redefine a town's port area and/or the transfer of port industry and associated inland waterway traffic to out-of-town areas.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on ports and maritime industries to make an effort to reduce pollution caused by ships in ports, by way of a Community-wide response to requests from city authorities, and to bring about a perceptible reduction in water and air pollution; stresses the need to reduce CO2 emissions from sea transport, to support international efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to study the possibility of proposing Community back-up measures;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 bis (nouveau) 5a. Calls for the establishment of an EU- wide network for the exchange of best practices among EU ports; calls upon regional organisations that include EU and non-EU members, such as the Organisation of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC), to adopt compatible procedures and practices in order to facilitate regional trade and save costs;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Emphasises most strongly that any debate on Europe and its maritime policy, if it is to succeed, must include the major role played by the European recreational craft sector in terms of local economic development, since marinas are not only a showcase for their hinterland, a powerful tool for promoting the discovery of the port and its environs, but also an essential supply service for local businesses; stresses that marinas play a major role in integrating the port into the city, not forgetting the recreational craft construction industry, which is a genuine economic driver for many European regions in terms of employment and business creation;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need for the Commission to assist stakeholders and cities towards a structured dialogue to improve the image of ports and lead to them being better integrated into the city and into urban life; in fact to ensure that port activities are sustainable; further notes that the presence of living and working areas side by side is good for the sustainability (less traffic) and quality of life of the cities and surrounding regions;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Highlights the territorial dimension of the development of European ports, particularly the need for cross-border cooperation and coordination between neighbouring port regions; stresses the importance of the European Neighbourhood Policy and the regional strategy for the Mediterranean, Baltic and Black Seas; welcomes the Commission’s proposal for drawing up a list of bottlenecks between EU ports and ports of the EU's neighbouring states;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that the EU’s main ports are generally well equipped and efficient; considers, however, that the technological changes needed to enable intermediate ports to meet the challenges of an increased volume of traffic will have major financial implications for the regions concerned;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that the EU’s main ports are generally well equipped and efficient; considers, however, that the technological changes needed to enable intermediate ports to meet the challenges of an increased
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that the EU’s main ports are generally well equipped and efficient; considers, however, that the technological changes needed to enable intermediate ports to meet the challenges of an increased volume of traffic will have major financial implications for the regions concerned; therefore urges these regions to make use of the possibilities of the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund to finance the acquisition of advanced technological facilities, to create jobs in innovative fields and to rehabilitate urban areas freed up by the transfer of port business to out-of-town areas; welcomes the Commission proposal to establish, at Community level, a series of common requirements as regards professional training for port workers with a view to enhancing their mobility by means of the mutual recognition of their qualifications and the harmonious development of ports; at the same time, advocates encouraging the use of European territorial cooperation programmes under the cohesion policy and cooperation programmes under the EU neighbourhood and enlargement policy;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that the EU’s main ports are generally well equipped and efficient; recalls however that there remains a considerable difference in terms of equipment and technology between the ports of the new and the old Member States; considers, however, that the technological changes needed to enable intermediate ports to meet the challenges of an increased volume of traffic will have major financial implications for the regions concerned; therefore urges these regions to make use of the possibilities of the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund to finance the acquisition of advanced technological facilities, to create jobs in innovative fields and to rehabilitate urban areas freed up by the transfer of port business to out-of-town areas;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that the EU’s main ports are generally well equipped and efficient; considers, however, that the technological changes needed to enable intermediate ports to meet the challenges of an increased volume of traffic will have major financial implications for the regions concerned; therefore urges these regions to make use of the possibilities of the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund to finance the acquisition of advanced technological facilities, to create jobs in innovative fields and to rehabilitate urban areas freed up by the transfer of port business to out-of-town areas; encourages the Commission, the Member States and the regional authorities concerned to employ a trans- border approach as far as possible to the use of existing capacities when co- financing port infrastructure;
source: PE-402.894
2008/06/04
TRAN
79 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9a (new) - having regard to Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Commends the Commission on the approach it took when drawing up the communication, particularly the extensive process of consultation, in particular at regional and local authority level;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2a (new) 2a. Welcomes the Commission’s focus on soft law measures such as publishing guidelines and removing administrative obstacles, rather than introducing new legislation;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Points to the
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Points to the crucial importance of the ports sector to the European Union from the economic, commercial, social, environmental and strategic points of view in the global market, which is subject to external investment flows that require adequate mechanisms to ensure transparency;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3a (new) 3a. Rejects any fresh attempt to liberalise port services at European Union level, for example by applying internal market competition rules (in particular as regards ‘public financing’, ‘port concessions’, ‘technical-nautical services’ and ‘cargo handling services’) to what is a strategic public service in various Member States;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3a (new) 3a. Believes that the Commission’s role is important in order to ensure that all European ports are able to reach their full potential; stresses however that the Commission should refrain from any interventionist policy which, directly or indirectly, aims to redirect traffic flows in Europe;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to publish guidelines on the application of Community environment legislation to port development and their infrastructure, the main objective being to protect the marine environment and the areas surrounding the ports;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to publish guidelines on the application of Community environment legislation to
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Considers it possible for ports and nature to coexist in a sustainable manner, a
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital -A (new) -A. whereas the debate on port services at European Union level is of great importance, as is well demonstrated by the European Parliament’s rejection of two relevant proposals for directives1 in 2003 and 2006;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Notes
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission systematically to monitor the development of the new technologies and management methods used internationally at ports and ship service, freight, passenger and land transport terminals with the aim of promoting policies and initiatives to develop Community ports and enhance their efficiency and productivity for the benefit of themselves and users;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7a (new) 7a. Stresses the social and cultural role of ports for the population of the hinterland and considers it essential to improve public awareness of the importance of ports as means of development;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7a (new) Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that maritime and river transport cannot be considered in isolation from land and air transport and that links to a port’s hinterland are of great importance to its commercial success
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that maritime and river transport cannot be considered in isolation from land and air transport and that links to
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that maritime and river transport cannot be considered in isolation from land and air transport and that links to a port’s hinterland are of great importance to its commercial success; with this in view,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Considers that maritime and river transport cannot be considered in isolation from land and air transport and that links to a port’s hinterland are of great importance to its commercial success; with this in view, also believes that planning is needed at Community level to ensure better exploitation of transport capacities in the area of cabotage and river transport, and also as regards connections with land and air transport, so as to ensure a coherent and genuine transport policy;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas a European ports policy at Community level, exploiting their comparative geopolitical advantages, is appropriate for this sector because of its
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Considers that one of the aims of the mid-term review of the trans-European
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Notes that European Union ports are in competition with third country ports which are often not subject to the same rules, and also face discriminatory economic policies implemented by EU neighbouring countries, for example via discriminatory tariff policies;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to study port safety issues anew and to factor in the increased cost in regard to the competitiveness of European ports;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to conduct a survey of the problems encountered by European ports in this area and calls on the Commission to consider compiling a log of these problems, so as specifically to tackle problems generated by competition with third country ports; calls on the Commission to submit a report on these problems to Parliament, as well as legislative proposals making it possible to remedy them with the aim of implementing an efficient Community ports policy;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to conduct a survey of the problems encountered by European ports in this area and
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Welcomes the Commission’s intention to conduct a survey of the problems encountered by European ports in this area and calls on the Commission to consider compiling a log of these problems, so as specifically to tackle problems generated by competition with
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Believes that new technologies, particularly information technologies, are key elements that will enable European ports
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13a (new) 13a. Urges the Commission and the Member States to hasten, through the appropriate bodies, the implementation of remote pilotage systems in order to increase efficiency and security in traffic management in ports as well as in roadstead areas;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13a (new) 13a. Stresses the need to develop cooperation with third countries in order to prepare and submit programmes for the development, coordination and transfer of know-how among neighbouring ports;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Urges the Commission to pursue research and innovation in this sector under the Union’s framework programmes and
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Da (new) Da. whereas, in view of its objectives of boosting the competitiveness of maritime transport and providing high-quality modern services, European ports policy should promote the following four principles: safety - swift service - low cost - respect for the environment,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Urges the Commission to pursue research and innovation in this sector under the Union’s framework programmes and calls on the Commission and Member States to support research into safety issues, so as to keep accidents to a minimum, into logistics, so as to improve the use of space in ports
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to support actively the continuous improvement of the "Search and Rescue" (SAR) fleet and other SAR functionalities in ports, under SOLAS (Safety of Life at Sea) and SAR Conventions and to further improve cooperation between Maritime Rescue Co-ordination Centres;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14a (new) 14a. Considers there is a need for the further development of the «Clean ship» and «Clean port» programmes;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission to consider introducing incentives to encourage shipping companies to reduce the number
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Warmly welcomes the Commission’s intention to submit a legislative proposal on creating a barrier-free European maritime transport area and considers that the aim of this proposal should be to ensure fair competition between maritime transport and land transport in the Union; notes, however, that the intention to create an EU maritime area will have to include the creation of an area in which competition is based on quality, with measures for the continued improvement of this sector of excellence, in particular aimed at resolving the question of flags of convenience, the lack of state aid for the maritime industry or its poor or excessive use, and the problem of non-Community vessels that fail to comply with Community labour and environmental standards; considers that impact analyses must form an integral part of Community actions on creating a framework for social dialogue;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. W
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Warmly welcomes the Commission’s intention to submit a legislative proposal on creating a barrier-free European maritime transport area and considers that the aim of this proposal should be to
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Warmly welcomes the Commission’s intention to submit a legislative proposal on creating a barrier-free European maritime transport area and considers that the aim of this proposal should be to ensure fair competition between maritime
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. having regard to the future challenges facing European ports, particularly in the areas of the environment, globalisation, sustainable development, employment, finance, market access and administration, as well as anti-competitive and discriminatory measures taken by non-EU countries in relevant geographical markets,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16a (new) 16a. Calls for appropriate financial incentives to maintain port infrastructure and maritime transport in the island and remote regions of the Union;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17a (new) 17a. Calls on the Commission to review and improve policies to develop and support short sea shipping;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Welcomes the early publication of guidelines for state aid to ports in 2008; and believes that these guidelines should cover the port area as such, with a distinction made between access and defence infrastructure, project-related infrastructure and superstructure and with no distinction made between different categories of ports;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19.
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Approves the extension of the transparency requirements laid down by Commission Directive 2006/111 of 16 November 2006 on the transparency of the financial relations between the Member States and public undertakings as well as on financial transparency within certain undertakings,
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Approves the extension of the transparency requirements laid down by Commission Directive 2006/111 of 16 November 2006 on the transparency of the financial relations between the Member States and public undertakings as well as on financial transparency within certain undertakings1
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Approves the extension of the transparency requirements laid down by the Commission Directive 2006/111 of 16 November 2006 on the transparency of the financial relations between the Member States and public undertakings as well as on financial transparency within certain undertakings1
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission to undertake a study of the funds provided by public authorities to European commercial ports so as to identify possible distortions of competition,
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission to undertake a study of the funds provided by public authorities to European commercial ports so as to identify possible distortions of competition, but
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission to undertake a study of the funds provided by public authorities to European commercial ports so as to identify possible distortions of competition, but considers
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. having regard to the future challenges facing European ports, particularly in the areas of the environment, globalisation, sustainable development, employment and social conditions, in particular as regards safety and lifelong learning, finance, market access and administration,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.Calls on the Commission to undertake a study of the funds provided by public authorities to European commercial ports so as to identify possible distortions of competition, but considers that aid given to port authorities to develop their port infrastructures, curb congestion and reduce road freight should not be seen as state aid, particularly when it is considered to be essential to ensure economic, social and territorial cohesion (e.g. islands);
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission to undertake a study of the funds provided by public authorities to European commercial ports so as to identify possible distortions of competition, but considers that aid given to port authorities to develop their port infrastructures, curb congestion and reduce road freight should not be seen as state aid unless it would benefit a single user or operator;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission to undertake a study of the funds provided by public authorities to European commercial ports so as to identify possible distortions of competition
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21a (new) 21a. Strongly supports the role of locally owned, non-for-profit trust ports, and urges local, regional, national and European authorities to take steps to protect them from disrepair, as their social, recreational and touristic benefit for the surrounding communities goes beyond their original economic function;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21a (new) 21a. Strongly supports the role of locally owned, not-for-profit trust ports, and urges local, regional, national and European authorities to take steps to protect them from disrepair, as their social, recreational and touristic benefit for the surrounding communities goes beyond their original economic function;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Takes note, in particular, of the Commission’s analysis of port concessions and calls on it to bear in mind the importance of some flexibility for port authorities in this area, particularly as regards the renewal of concessions linked to major investments, but believes that this flexibility should not be used to prevent competition within ports;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23a (new) 23a. Urges that initiatives be taken to combat precarious conditions and the risks of accidents in the sector and to guarantee and ensure respect for the rights of port workers, particularly as regards employment with rights, fair pay and decent working conditions, social protection, collective agreements, trade union rights and professional training;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Urges that a social dialogue committee be set up and considers that it should deal with subjects related to ports, including
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Urges that a social dialogue committee be set up and considers that it should deal with subjects related to ports, including workers’ rights, concessions and the 1979 International Labour Organisation Convention on occupational safety and health (dock work); asks the Commission to verify compatibility between ILO Convention 137 and the EU Treaty, in particular as regards the principle of the freedom to provide services, and to report back to Parliament;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. having regard to the importance to ports of modern infrastructure and
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Urges that a social dialogue committee be set up and considers that it should deal with subjects related to ports, including workers’ rights
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Supports the Commission’s desire to provide port workers with a mutually recognisable basic qualification so as to foster flexibility in the sector; hereto and, as a first step, a comparison should be made between the different existing systems of professional qualifications for port workers;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Supports the Commission’s desire to provide port workers with a mutually recognisable basic qualification so as to foster flexibility in the sector; considers, however, that this basic qualification must not have the effect of lowering the average level of qualification of port workers in a Member State;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26a (new) 26a. Proposes that the topic of professional qualifications and lifelong training be addressed together with the social partners within the future European social dialogue committee;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 27 27. Urges the Commission to promote the exchange of good practice in the port sector in general and with regard to innovation and the training of workers in particular in order improve the quality of services, competitiveness and the attraction of investment;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Believes that it is of the utmost importance to maintain a balance between the freedom to provide services and the specific requirements of ports; considers, nevertheless, that guaranteeing daily transport for passengers and freight for all localities on deltas and estuaries should become a priority;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 28 28. Believes that it is of the utmost importance to maintain a balance between the freedom to provide services and the specific requirements of ports
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 29.
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29a (new) 29a. Urges the Commission, in line with the Parliament resolution of 8 May 2008 on the Transatlantic Economic Council to continue its efforts to ensure that the US regulation to scan 100% of US-bound cargo is changed to ensure cooperation based on the mutual recognition of ‘authorised economic operators’ and of security standards agreed by the World Customs Organisation (C-TPAT, SAFE) framework; calls on the Commission to evaluate the potential costs of the measure regarding the 100% scanning of US- bound maritime cargo containers to business and to the EU economy, as well as its potential impact on customs operations;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Ia (new) Ia. mindful of the special characteristics and problems of the outermost regions, which mean that the EU’s maritime transport policy needs to be adapted to the permanent constraints affecting these regions,
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 source: PE-407.658
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1340/COM_SEC(2007)1340_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1340/COM_SEC(2007)1340_EN.pdf |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.699&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-400699_EN.html |
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15368&j=0&l=en
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15368&j=0&l=enNew
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15368&j=1&l=en |
events/0/date |
Old
2007-10-18T00:00:00New
2007-10-17T00:00:00 |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1339/COM_SEC(2007)1339_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1339/COM_SEC(2007)1339_EN.pdf |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.699&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.699&secondRef=02 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.591New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE404.591 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.658New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE407.658 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0308_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0308_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15368&j=1&l=en
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0616/COM_COM(2007)0616_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0616/COM_COM(2007)0616_EN.pdf |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080903&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080903&type=CRE |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1339/COM_SEC(2007)1339_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1339/COM_SEC(2007)1339_EN.pdf |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1340/COM_SEC(2007)1340_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2007/1340/COM_SEC(2007)1340_EN.pdf |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-308&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0308_EN.html |
docs/6/body |
EC
|
docs/7/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0616/COM_COM(2007)0616_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0616/COM_COM(2007)0616_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-308&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0308_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-408New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0408_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/6/58004New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
A European ports policyNew
European ports policy |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0616/COM_COM(2007)0616_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0616/COM_COM(2007)0616_EN.pdf |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|