Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | REGI | SUDRE Margie ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | PECH | ||
Committee Opinion | AGRI | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | TRAN | ||
Committee Opinion | ENVI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 592 votes to 70, with 22 abstentions, a resolution on the strategy for the outermost regions (ORs), in response to the Commission’s communication on this issue.
The own initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Margie SUDRE (EPP-ED, FR) on behalf of the Committee on Regional Development.
Achievements of the stronger partnership for the ORs : the Parliament notes that the communication offers a particularly favourable assessment of the action taken by the Commission, even though many of the measures it prides itself on only partly address the needs of the ORs (particularly in the fields of transport and accessibility, research, fisheries and regional cooperation), and no reference is made to the problems encountered and efforts made by the ORs, for example, in connection with the renewal of State aid schemes.
MEPs note that Structural Fund intervention continues to play a major role in the development of the ORs. Nevertheless, they would like to see indicators other than merely GDP as compared with the Community average being used to measure the degree of cohesion achieved in these regions. In addition, cohesion policy should be better coordinated with other Community policies across the board, so as to enhance synergies.
The resolution notes the satisfactory results obtained under the specific guidance programmes for remoteness and insularity (POSEI) (agriculture and fisheries) and in the sugar cane, rum and bananas sectors and wishes to see proper consideration given to the financial impact which the ongoing international negotiations may have on these agricultural sectors.
Given the role of ORs in the EU's integrated maritime policy, the Commission is called upon to include in its plan support measures for the fishing industries in these regions.
Fruition stage of the stronger partnership for the ORs : MEPs regret that the proposals put forward by the Commission for the fruition of the partnership mostly concern measures which already exist or are being finalised. They also regret the initial reluctance shown by DG Trade to take into account the specific characteristics of the outermost regions when negotiating Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) and urge the Commission to continue to seek compromises that respect the interests of the ORs concerned, when it comes to reaching final agreements with the ACP countries.
The Parliament reiterates the need for the ORs to be given differential treatment in the area of transport, particularly as regards the inclusion of civil aviation in the European Emission Trading Scheme (ETS). Furthermore, MEPs consider that Community interventions should be a catalyst for a spirit of enterprise that will transform the ORs into centres of excellence, driven by sectors which fully exploit their advantages and know-how, such as waste management, renewable energies, energy self-sufficiency, biodiversity, student mobility, research into climate change and crisis management.
An amendment adopted in plenary calls for the efforts made to date concerning the ORs to be pursued in order both to step up the establishment of local research facilities that are equal to their potential and to encourage and help the development of attractive, successful universities, with genuine resources and with standards equal to those of universities in other parts of the Union's territory.
Debate on the future of the Union's strategy for the ORs : MEPs commend the Commission on its initiative in opening a debate on the future of the strategy to assist the outermost regions, the results of which will serve as the basis for drawing up a new proposal by 2009. They stress, nevertheless, that this debate should not be confined to the challenges mentioned (climate change, demographic change and migration management, agriculture, maritime policy).
The Parliament urges that the scope of Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty (in due course Articles 299 and 311(a) of the Lisbon Treaty), which is the cornerstone of the Union's policy to assist ORs, should be included on the agenda for the debates.
MEPs stress the importance of public services for economic, social and territorial cohesion in the outermost regions, and call for the urgent adoption of measures aimed at combating endemic unemployment, poverty and unequal income distribution. They also believe that the future common immigration policy should devote special attention to the position of ORs, which are all EU external borders. Moreover, the Community support for agriculture in the ORs should be the object of extensive debate with reference to identifying the real challenges, the need to move towards local self-sufficiency and farm income levels.
The Parliament recommends that ways of overcoming the narrowness of local markets, the increasingly open competitive environment, the difficulty of finding market outlets in mainland Europe markets, as well as of improving the coordination of the funding for cooperation projects with neighbouring countries, should also be priorities for debate, together with effective participation by the ORs in European policies to promote innovation and overcome the digital divide.
The Commission, the Council and the other EU institutions concerned are called upon to efficiently, adequately and effectively ensure future Community funding of the Union's strategy to assist ORs and the compensation of handicaps linked to their outermost status.
The Committee on Regional Development adopted the own-initiative report by Margie SUDRE (EPP-ED, FR) in response to the Commission’s communication on the strategy for the outermost regions (ORs).
Achievements of the stronger partnership for the ORs : the report notes that the communication offers a particularly favourable assessment of the action taken by the Commission, even though many of the measures it prides itself on only partly address the needs of the ORs (particularly in the fields of transport and accessibility, research, fisheries and regional cooperation).
MEPs note that Structural Fund intervention continues to play a major role in the development of the ORs. Nevertheless, they would like to see indicators other than merely GDP as compared with the Community average being used to measure the degree of cohesion achieved in these regions. In addition, cohesion policy should be better coordinated with other Community policies across the board, so as to enhance synergies.
Given the role of ORs in the EU's integrated maritime policy, the Commission is called to include in its plan support measures for the fishing industries in these regions.
Fruition stage of the stronger partnership for the ORs: MEPs are concerned at the ever-increasing importance placed by the Commission on tools for assessing Community policies and instruments to assist the ORs, and to estimating the quantitative effects of the handicaps faced by these regions with a view to devising a methodology for offsetting the additional costs linked to their outermost status. They hope that this tendency to take into account increasingly mathematical justifications for the measures taken will not serve as a pretext for calling into question part of the Union's policy to assist the ORs nor deter institutional and economic actors in the outermost regions by imposing conditions on them which are too difficult to meet.
The report reiterates the need for the ORs to be given differential treatment in the area of transport, particularly as regards the inclusion of civil aviation in the European Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) system. Furthermore, MEPs consider that Community interventions should be a catalyst for a spirit of enterprise that will transform the ORs into centres of excellence, driven by sectors which fully exploit their advantages and know-how, such as waste management, renewable energies, energy self-sufficiency, biodiversity, student mobility, research into climate change and crisis management.
Debate on the future of the Union's strategy for the ORs : MEPs commend the Commission on its initiative in opening a debate on the future of the strategy to assist the outermost regions, the results of which will serve as the basis for drawing up a new proposal by 2009. They stress, nevertheless, that this debate should not be confined to the challenges mentioned (climate change, demographic change and migration management, agriculture, maritime policy).
The Committee on Regional Development urges that the scope of Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty (in due course Articles 299 and 311(a) of the Lisbon Treaty), which is the cornerstone of the Union's policy to assist ORs, should be included on the agenda for the debates.
MEPs stress the importance of public services for economic, social and territorial cohesion in the outermost regions, and call for the urgent adoption of measures aimed at combating endemic unemployment, poverty and unequal income distribution. They also believe that the future common immigration policy should devote special attention to the position of ORs, which are all EU external borders. Moreover, the Community support for agriculture in the ORs should be the object of extensive debate with reference to identifying the real challenges, the need to move towards local self-sufficiency and farm income levels.
Lastly, the ways of overcoming the narrowness of local markets, the increasingly open competitive environment, the difficulty of finding market outlets in mainland European markets or in their respective geographic zones, as well as of improving the coordination of funding for cooperation projects with neighbouring countries, together with effective participation by the ORs in European policies to promote innovation and overcome the digital divide, should also be priorities for debate.
PURPOSE: to pursue and extend the strategy for the outermost regions (OR).
CONTENT: article 299(2) of the EC Treaty and the two Communications adopted by the Commission in 2004 stress the need to recognise the special nature of the outermost regions (the "ORs") and to put in place a genuine European strategy to support them.
While giving a positive assessment of the first implementation phase of the OR strategy, the Communication stresses the need to intensify the aspects of the 2004 strategy by adopting additional measures for the period 2007-2013. It also considers the long term challenges, focusing on sensitive issues for ORs: climate change, demographic change, and the management of migration, agriculture and EU maritime policy.
The Commission intends to redouble each aspect of the strategy by taking complementary action:
Aspect 1 - Reduce the accessibility deficit and the effects of other constraints specific to the outermost regions: The following measures could help achieve this goal: i) exploiting the opportunities offered by the use of the specific allocation to offset the additional costs of transport and new information and communication technologies; ii) continuing the effort to fill the broadband gap, particularly via ERDF operational programmes; iii) exploiting the opportunities offered by implementing the TEN-T, TEN-E and Marco Polo II programmes; iv) assessing the specific needs of the ORs when the POSEI programme implementation report is drawn up.
Aspect 2 - Make the outermost regions more competitive: Several instruments may strengthen the competitiveness of the ORs: i) the cohesion policy, particularly through the operational programmes for the period 2007–2013 for both the ERDF and the ESF; ii) Community programmes (recognising the special nature of the ORs in the specific programmes of the 7 th FPRTD); exploitation of the Framework Programme on Innovation and Competitiveness as well as of the Lifelong Learning Programme); iii) finally, in relation to the operation of services of general economic interest, the Commission will continue to take account of regional specificities as well as of a detailed analysis of the relevant markets.
Aspect 3 - Strengthen the Wider Neighbourhood Action Plan: Regional integration of the ORs in their vicinities needs to be strengthened by involving public and private local players as well as the Member States concerned. Dialogue between the regions and their neighbouring countries, particularly the ACP (Africa, Caribbean, and Pacific) countries and the overseas countries and territories (OCTs) associated with the EU is the tool for pushing this process forward. There are already some potential measures for pursuing this priority: i) recognising the special nature of the ORs in Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs); ii) coordination of financial instruments; iii) strengthening sea connections between ORs and neighbouring non-member countries; iv) joint participation by ORs and non-member countries in research networks and Community framework programmes; v) recognising the special nature of the ORs in migration policy.
The Communication launches a debate with the European Institutions, the Member States and, within the outermost regions, the regional and local authorities, socio-economic players, the research sector and academic circles. It is suggested that the consultation phase will last until March 2008. During this period the Commission will organise, in partnership with the regions and Member States concerned, seminars and workshops to discuss the following questions:
To what extent can the 2004 strategy be adapted to the new challenges facing the ORs? What would be the most appropriate ways to tackle the major demographic differences and migratory flows between the ORs and neighbouring regions or countries? Is climate change a special challenge to the ORs? What actions can the ORs pursue, under European maritime policy, in order to both benefit from it and to be able to contribute to Europe's sustainable development?
After the closure of the public consultation the Commission will prepare its proposal on the future of the partnership with the outermost regions.
PURPOSE: to pursue and extend the strategy for the outermost regions (OR).
CONTENT: article 299(2) of the EC Treaty and the two Communications adopted by the Commission in 2004 stress the need to recognise the special nature of the outermost regions (the "ORs") and to put in place a genuine European strategy to support them.
While giving a positive assessment of the first implementation phase of the OR strategy, the Communication stresses the need to intensify the aspects of the 2004 strategy by adopting additional measures for the period 2007-2013. It also considers the long term challenges, focusing on sensitive issues for ORs: climate change, demographic change, and the management of migration, agriculture and EU maritime policy.
The Commission intends to redouble each aspect of the strategy by taking complementary action:
Aspect 1 - Reduce the accessibility deficit and the effects of other constraints specific to the outermost regions: The following measures could help achieve this goal: i) exploiting the opportunities offered by the use of the specific allocation to offset the additional costs of transport and new information and communication technologies; ii) continuing the effort to fill the broadband gap, particularly via ERDF operational programmes; iii) exploiting the opportunities offered by implementing the TEN-T, TEN-E and Marco Polo II programmes; iv) assessing the specific needs of the ORs when the POSEI programme implementation report is drawn up.
Aspect 2 - Make the outermost regions more competitive: Several instruments may strengthen the competitiveness of the ORs: i) the cohesion policy, particularly through the operational programmes for the period 2007–2013 for both the ERDF and the ESF; ii) Community programmes (recognising the special nature of the ORs in the specific programmes of the 7 th FPRTD); exploitation of the Framework Programme on Innovation and Competitiveness as well as of the Lifelong Learning Programme); iii) finally, in relation to the operation of services of general economic interest, the Commission will continue to take account of regional specificities as well as of a detailed analysis of the relevant markets.
Aspect 3 - Strengthen the Wider Neighbourhood Action Plan: Regional integration of the ORs in their vicinities needs to be strengthened by involving public and private local players as well as the Member States concerned. Dialogue between the regions and their neighbouring countries, particularly the ACP (Africa, Caribbean, and Pacific) countries and the overseas countries and territories (OCTs) associated with the EU is the tool for pushing this process forward. There are already some potential measures for pursuing this priority: i) recognising the special nature of the ORs in Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs); ii) coordination of financial instruments; iii) strengthening sea connections between ORs and neighbouring non-member countries; iv) joint participation by ORs and non-member countries in research networks and Community framework programmes; v) recognising the special nature of the ORs in migration policy.
The Communication launches a debate with the European Institutions, the Member States and, within the outermost regions, the regional and local authorities, socio-economic players, the research sector and academic circles. It is suggested that the consultation phase will last until March 2008. During this period the Commission will organise, in partnership with the regions and Member States concerned, seminars and workshops to discuss the following questions:
To what extent can the 2004 strategy be adapted to the new challenges facing the ORs? What would be the most appropriate ways to tackle the major demographic differences and migratory flows between the ORs and neighbouring regions or countries? Is climate change a special challenge to the ORs? What actions can the ORs pursue, under European maritime policy, in order to both benefit from it and to be able to contribute to Europe's sustainable development?
After the closure of the public consultation the Commission will prepare its proposal on the future of the partnership with the outermost regions.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4116
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3593/2
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0210/2008
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0158/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0158/2008
- Committee opinion: PE400.669
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE402.891
- Committee draft report: PE400.398
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2007)0507
- Non-legislative basic document: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2007)0507
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document: COM(2007)0507 EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE400.398
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE402.891
- Committee opinion: PE400.669
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0158/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3593/2
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4116
Activities
- Pedro GUERREIRO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
- Margie SUDRE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
- Emmanouil ANGELAKAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
- Jean Marie BEAUPUY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
- Rolf BEREND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
- Emanuel Jardim FERNANDES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
- Mieczysław Edmund JANOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
- Madeleine JOUYE DE GRANDMAISON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
- Sérgio MARQUES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
- Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
- Catherine NERIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
- Lambert van NISTELROOIJ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
- Toomas SAVI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
- Marek SIWIEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
- Kyriacos TRIANTAPHYLLIDES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
- Oldřich VLASÁK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Outermost regions (debate)
Votes
Rapport Sudre A6-0158/2008 - par. 13 #
Rapport Sudre A6-0158/2008 - am. 9 #
Rapport Sudre A6-0158/2008 - am. 11 #
Rapport Sudre A6-0158/2008 - am. 13 #
Rapport Sudre A6-0158/2008 - am. 15 #
Rapport Sudre A6-0158/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
77 |
2008/2010(INI)
2008/03/07
REGI
48 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 – having regard to Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty, which will be replaced by Articles
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas ORs are a considerable asset to the European Union as regards space research, in particular through Kourou,
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I b (new) Ib. whereas the European Union's status as a major power with one of the world's richest natural biodiversities is due precisely to the ORs and OCTs;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls for the ORs unit at the Commission to be maintained
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Notes that Structural Fund intervention continues to play a major role in the development of the ORs; nevertheless, would like to see cohesion policy better coordinated with other Community policies so as to enhance synergies
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Calls, in particular, for the management of the ERDF for the outermost regions to be facilitated via a sufficiently broad definition of its scope with a view to the absorption of the entirety of the fund by means of investment or through compensation for all the additional costs of outermost status, including the transport of products (cf. Annex I to the Treaty);
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes the
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes the implementation of the NETBIUM programme in particular, which is a significant example of the ORs' potential in the field of scientific research; wonders, however, about the fact that, despite the quantity of projects conducted and the extent of the OR's potential, the ORs' integration in the European Research Area (ERA) is still limited; calls, therefore, for efforts to be redoubled in order to (1) step up the establishment of local research facilities that are equal to their potential, (2) encourage and help OR local authorities to increase their research efforts and investments (an essential means of creating new jobs and economic sectors with good prospects), (3) encourage and support the development of attractive, successful universities, with genuine resources and with standards equal to those of universities in mainland Europe;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Commission to implement a programme to support the local cultures of ORs, in particular with a view to supporting and encouraging the survival of the regional languages (such as creole), lifestyles, and customary, artistic, culinary, spiritual and philosophical traditions of those regions;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Calls on the Commission to take account of the special nature of Guyana in these OR aid programmes: Guyana is one of the few areas of the European Union that still has various indigenous peoples who must be respected and protected by every possible means; the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples of 13 September 2007 states that indigenous peoples are equal to all other peoples, have a right to be different, to consider themselves different and to be respected as such; to this end, there is an urgent need for specific European aid programmes to be established for them in order effectively to protect the cultural wealth which such peoples represent for Europe's and man's common heritage, promote and respect the intrinsic rights of such peoples deriving from their political, economic and social structures, spiritual traditions, history and philosophy, and in particular guarantee their tight to full enjoyment of their lands, territories and resources;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the Azores, the Canaries, Guadeloupe, Guyana, Madeira, Martinique and Reunion are characterised by a combination of
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Regrets that the ORs were not involved in the preparation of the EPA negotiations as regards aspects relating to their specific interests nor in the negotiation of EPAs with the ACP countries as regards those same aspects; calls therefore on the Commission to associate the ORs as closely as possible in the further negotiations;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Calls on the Commission, in the context of the wider neighbourhood action plan, with a view to coordinating with the EDF the funding of OR extraterritorial cooperation projects with ACP countries, to set up and organise information meetings in the different ORs to enable local stakeholders (private and public) to acquire a better understanding and grasp of the complexity and specific features of the procedures required for the implementation and success of such projects;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that Community actions should be a catalyst for a spirit of enterprise that will transform the ORs into centres of excellence, driven by sectors which fully exploit their advantages and know-how, such as waste management, renewable energies,
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that Community actions should be a catalyst for a spirit of enterprise that will, on the basis of public/private partnerships, transform the ORs into centres of excellence, driven by sectors which fully exploit their advantages and know-how, such as waste management, renewable energies, student mobility, climate research or crisis management;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12-A.. Believes it is essential to ensure full access for the inhabitants of these regions to the means of information and communication offered by the new technologies, including broadband technologies and, in particular, Internet broadband access;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Points out that many actions and programmes to be pursued and initiated for the ORs can make significant contributions to established Community and international priorities, in particular as regards climate change, the protection of biodiversity, renewable energies, health in developing countries, food supplies, diversification of economic and productive activities, and research into slavery and colonialism;.
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Calls on the Commission to ensure that proper funding is provided, in the context of research programmes, for research relating to the history of slavery and colonisation;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15-A. Believes that the EU's strategy for the outermost regions must be based on measures of a permanent nature which are properly financed and can be adapted to the different needs of each of those regions, thus helping them tackle the permanent structural constraints they have to deal with;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 c (new) 15-C.. Believes there is an urgent need to adopt measures aimed at combating endemic unemployment, poverty and unequal income distribution in the outermost regions, which have some of the worst rates in the EU;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 d 15-D. Stresses the importance of public services for economic and social cohesion in the outermost regions, in such areas as air and sea transport, energy and communications ;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Believes that the ORs provide the Union with an opportunity in its current reflection on climate distortion with regard to trend observation, damage prevention, disaster response and the protection of ecosystems; calls, in this connection, on the Council to adopt without delay the revised regulation on the EUSF, which is specifically aimed at the special position of outermost regions; believes also that the Commission's proposals to strengthen the EU's disaster response capacity should make full use of expertise relating to the geographical location of these regions;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Believes that the future common immigration policy should devote special attention to the position of ORs, which are all EU external borders, surrounded by less favoured third countries and subject to very strong migratory pressure which, added to a population growth rate which in many cases is still far higher than the Community average, is causing worrying levels of economic and social tension in this regions;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Requests that Community support for agriculture in the ORs, which is given less emphasis than other sectors, should be the object of extensive debate with reference to identifying the real challenges, the need to move towards local self sufficiency, the importance of the environmental dimension and the need to take into account the effects of the opening up of trade introduced by the EPAs and the future free trade agreements with Latin America, including the Andean Community;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17-A. Stresses the heightened importance of agriculture for the outermost regions and its contribution to the goal of economic and social cohesion, thanks to the income and employment it creates and the upstream and downstream economic activities it generates; favours new measures to guarantee producers' incomes, employment and the economic situation of agriculture; advocates keeping farm aids linked as far as possible to production, applying a system of advances, and continuing to support producers' organisations, especially for the marketing of their products;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. Believes that ORs should be placed at the heart of the EU maritime policy, and stresses that the debate on this issue should focus on the role they can play as regards sustainable use of seas, oceans and coastal areas, and international maritime governance;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 b (new) 17-B. Believes that it is not correct to propose, as the Commission does, a general increase in milk quotas at Union level; favours, rather, a localised increase based on the productive capacities and needs of particular Member States and regions, especially the outermost regions; advocates establishing a 'premium' to support the organised collection of milk from the producers in those regions;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) B a. having regard to the special circumstances of Ceuta and Melilla, as remote cities with borders with another continent;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Requests that the questions of future Community funding for the Union's strategy to assist ORs and the compensation of handicaps linked to outermost status should not be side-
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Calls on the Commission to provide, in the context of compensation for handicaps relating to the position of the outermost regions, for the drafting of a proposal for an EU directive to regulate the rates charged by private and public companies for postal and telecommunications services, so as to ensure that such rates do not exceed the telecommunications and postal rates applied between two mainland Member States;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. Calls on the EU institutions to give Ceuta and Melilla a special status similar to that of the outermost regions ;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 c (new) Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Recommends that ways of overcoming the narrowness of local markets, the increasingly open competitive environment, and the difficulty of finding market outlets in mainland Europe markets or in the geographical area concerned, should also be priorities for debate, together with effective participation by the ORs in European policies to promote innovation and overcome the digital divide, including the improvement of links with the neighbouring countries;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Stresses that the partnership, which is essential to the success of the debate, should not be limited solely to European, national and local public institutions, but should provide an opportunity, as in the past, to involve in discussions the entire economic fabric of the outermost regions, represented by structured organisations which have day-to-day experience of the impact of Community policies on the ground;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Considers that the best strategy for ensuring the endogenous and sustainable development of the outermost regions is to make the most of their particular attributes,
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Calls on the Commission to submit a communication addressed to Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, following the Partners' Conference due to be held in Brussels on 14 and 15 May 2008, to draw conclusions and summarise the progress highlighted by the conference;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Calls on the Commission to conduct an environmental and social impact study on the reform of the sugar and banana COMs;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) B-A. Believes it is imperative to recognise the specific characteristics of the outermost regions, moving forward with policies and measures, not dependent on transitional criteria or circumstantial or artificial wealth trends, which can contribute to offering solutions for the permanent constraints to which they are subject;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. having regard to the structure of the economies of the outermost regions, marked by close links with agriculture and fisheries, which, together with services (particularly tourism), are
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the ORs are totally dependent on transport links and whereas the additional costs relating to the transport of persons and goods, inadequate services in terms of frequency or coverage, high fares, and the difficulties in setting up or maintaining regional transport services are major obstacles in the way of the economic development and accessibility of ORs,
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas, during the last three years, the ORs have been directly affected by major Community reforms, including the financial perspective, regional policy 2007- 2013, the EFF, the EAFRD, State aids, the COM in sugar and bananas and the POSEI schemes for agriculture and fisheries,
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas the image of ORs, often seen as regions subsidised by Community or regional funds, without consideration for the positive impact of such funding, is hardly offset by the genuine added value they contribute to the EU in environmental, cultural and geostrategic terms, which is not immediately visible,
source: PE-402.891
2008/03/12
PECH
29 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas, despite the improvements observed, there is still a need for fresh investment in order to improve working conditions for those operating in the fisheries sector, as well as infrastructures and port equipment for fisheries, and to renew and modernise the fleets of the outermost regions,
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 - indent 1 - Considering the
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 1 - Considering the area corresponding to the EEZs of ORs as an 'exclusive access zone' in order to guarantee the sustainability of marine ecosystems
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 1 a (new) - Undertaking a scientific assessment of the potential of the marine resources in those waters, and, in line with the precautionary principle as defined under the CFP, reserving the EEZs adjoining the outermost regions for the local fleets;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 1 b (new) - Evaluating, on the basis of the principle of relative stability, the socio-economic impact of an increased fishing effort and the use of certain tackle by vessels with greater fishing capacity in the EEZs adjoining the outermost regions in terms of the sustainability of the local communities concerned;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 2 -
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 3 -
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 3 - Providing Community support for scientific fisheries research and the gathering of information;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 6 -
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 6 - Creating a Community programme to support small-scale inshore and artisanal fishing, taking account of its specific characteristics and its social and economic importance in the regions concerned;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 7 - Supporting improvements to professional training and qualification, working conditions (including conditions ensuring hygiene, safety and comfort) and the economic situation for fishermen;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the fleets consist for the most part of ageing vessels (in some of the outermost regions more than 30% are of this type), while the elimination of Community aid for fleet renewal will make it difficult to remedy a situation in which they are lagging behind the fleets from the European mainland,
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 7 - Supporting improvements to working conditions (including conditions ensuring hygiene, safety and comfort) and the economic situation for fishermen, together with more appropriate professional training, with a view to renewing the industry's age profile;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 8 - Boosting support for the processing, marketing and promotion of fish products from the O
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 8 Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 9 - Modernising and creating port infrastructure and facilities to support
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 9 a (new) - Support for the sustainable development of aquaculture, in the context of the specific needs of each of the regions concerned;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 10 - Support for the installation and modernisation of specific means of prevention, rescue, monitoring, checks and control
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 10 a (new) - Creation of a Regional Advisory Council for the Outermost Regions, with a view to the active participation of fisheries workers and the articulation of the industry's problems vis-à-vis the common fisheries policy, taking account of the specific characteristics of fisheries in the outermost regions and the social and economic circumstances of their fisheries sectors;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – indent 10 a (new) - Creation of a Regional Advisory Council for the Outermost Regions.
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4-A. Calls on the Commission to convert POSEI-Fisheries into a permanent support programme for the outermost regions, to be updated regularly;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4-B. Welcomes the creation of a subdivision for the islands under the umbrella of the Western Waters Regional Advisory Committee (South), in the interests of a more objective treatment for the particular fisheries of the outermost regions.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. having regard to the outermost regions' dependent situation, in social and economic terms, with regard to the fish stocks in their Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) and to the biological vulnerability of their fishing zones,
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses how important the fishing industry is in the socio-economic situation, in employment and in promoting economic and social cohesion in the outermost regions (ORs), whose economies suffer from permanent structural constraints and limited possibilities for economic diversification;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1-A. Considers that the Commission must ensure positive discrimination for the outermost regions' fleets in terms of access to their own fish stocks, and also, specifically, safeguard the sustainability of traditional fisheries;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers it necessary to
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers it necessary to adopt new, more effective measures, not based on transitional criteria or circumstantial wealth trends, to promote the ORs' capacity to cope with the conditions and permanent structural handicaps facing them, particularly in the fishing industry;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Calls on the Commission, recognising the specific characteristics of and differences between ORs, on the one hand, and considering their role in the EU's integrated maritime policy, on the other, to include in its plan support measures for the fishing industries in these regions that are aimed, in particular, at:
source: PE-404.407
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/5/rapporteur |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.669&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AD-400669_EN.html |
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14918&j=0&l=enNew
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14918&j=1&l=en |
events/0/date |
Old
2007-09-12T00:00:00New
2007-09-11T00:00:00 |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.398New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE400.398 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.891New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE402.891 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.669&secondRef=03New
http://nullEN&reference=PE400.669&secondRef=03 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0158_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0158_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14918&j=1&l=en
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080519&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080519&type=CRE |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-158&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0158_EN.html |
docs/4/body |
EC
|
docs/5/body |
EC
|
events/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0507/COM_COM(2007)0507_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0507/COM_COM(2007)0507_EN.pdf |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-158&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0158_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-210New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0210_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
REGI/6/58018New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/commission/0/DG/title |
Old
Regional PolicyNew
Regional and Urban Policy |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0507/COM_COM(2007)0507_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0507/COM_COM(2007)0507_EN.pdf |
other/0/dg/title |
Old
Regional PolicyNew
Regional and Urban Policy |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|