Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | DEVE | VAN HECKE Johan ( ALDE) | |
Committee Opinion | INTA | ||
Committee Opinion | BUDG |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 443 votes to 8, with 11 abstentions, a resolution on the follow-up to the Paris Declaration of 2005 on aid effectiveness.
The own-initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Johan VAN HECKE (ALDE, BE) on behalf of the Committee on Development.
The Parliament calls on the Member States and the Commission to ensure that the EU speaks with one voice in terms of development, in order to make their actions more harmonised, transparent, predictable and collectively effective. In particular, it considers that the Commission should focus its development policy on the eradication of poverty and results .
Concerned about the rise in prices of raw materials and the current global food crisis, the Parliament calls on the Commission and the Member States to support measures that aim to stabilise raw material prices for developing countries. It also calls for a better integration of new Member States into the Community development policy and recalls that new Member States have committed themselves to ODA targets of 0.17% of GNI by 2010 and 0.33% by 2015.
The Parliament emphasises that aid reform is only one of the steps that the EU must take along with making its trade, security, migration, agriculture, fisheries, energy, environment, climate change and other policies coherent with development objectives in order to benefit developing countries and promote a fair international financial and trade system in favour of development. It also recalls that the agendas of aid quantity and aid quality are inextricably linked , and that aid effectiveness targets can only be met if the Commission and the Member States reconfirm their commitment to achieving their collective target for ODA of 0.56% of GNI in 2010 and 0.7% of GNI in 2015 .
The Parliament then makes a series of recommendations on the development policy, which can be summarised as follows:
MDG ( Millennium Development Goals): the Parliament calls on the Commission and Member States to ensure that EU policies, as well as the aid architecture, support the Paris Declaration principle of managing for results. It calls for the creation and implementation of innovative financing mechanisms to contribute to attaining the MDGs, without these additional resources replacing the commitments already made in terms of public development aid. In particular, it insists that MDGs should focus on health, recognising that most of the MDG targets will not be met by 2015. Rationalise aid and reinforce efficiency : the Parliament calls on the Commission to devise a matrix of all the financial instruments from which it has awarded funds for good governance, whether from the European Development Fund (EDF), the DCI, the EU-Africa Strategy or the funding allocated to African governments for good governance, in order to check the consistency of policies and the sound management of these funds. Division of labour : to further improve the effectiveness of aid granted, the Parliament calls on Member States to promote the division of labour agenda, as set out in the code of conduct proposed by the Commission (Commission Communication entitled “EU Code of Conduct on Division of Labour in Development Policy” – see COM(2007)0072 ). It stresses that the division of labour should be country-led, based on the Paris Declaration principles (results-focused) and lead to sufficient financing of all sectors in each partner country. Strengthening the democratic control of aid : the Parliament considers that it is necessary to strengthen all means of monitoring aid granted, particularly by offering partner countries the possibility of better managing parliamentary oversight of aid effectiveness. It is therefore necessary to provide developing country parliaments with resources to ensure that they have sufficient capacity to engage in scrutiny and oversight of their governments' budgets. It stresses the need for international financial institutions and donor countries to publish the conditions for granting development aid, so that genuine democratic control can be exercised at all levels. Budgetary support : the Parliament s upports the Commission’s choice to increasingly use budget support. It also encourages the Commission to improve the clarity of the definitions relating to the ODA sectoral allocations so as to improve consistency of the results ensuring that there is no widening of ODA definitions to include non-aid items such as military spending. Fighting against corruption : the Parliament recalls that corruption is a major obstacle to greater aid effectiveness. Therefore, recipient countries' public financial management systems must be more transparent and practical measures are needed to enable civil society to ensure that aid provided by the EU reaches the rightful recipients. Simplification of procedures and respecting the timeframe for granting aid : the Parliament calls on the Commission to continue to simplify procedures, including aid delivery processes, and to further decentralise responsibility by providing the delegations with sufficient capacity to monitor how aid is being granted on the ground. It fully supports the role played by the Commission in terms of coordinating the development cooperation among Member States and emphasises the added value provided by the Commission in taking a leading role in the political dialogue between the EU and the partner countries. Plenary also underlines the need to disburse aid according to partners' own priorities and timetables, and in conformance to national planning and development priorities, or the national budgeting timeframe. Basic public services : once again, the Parliament calls for at least 20% of development aid to be devoted to improving basic public services such as education, health, access to water and sanitation. Untying and conditionality of development aid : similarly, the Parliament again calls for the complete untying of aid, as it has done on numerous occasions during previous years, and insists on the gradual phasing out of the policy-oriented conditionality of aid (notably economic) in order to support a common understanding on key priorities. Funding of aid : the Parliament calls for incremental and predictable funding, in the form of multi-year (3 years or more) aid commitments, which are based on clear and transparent criteria and poverty eradication outcomes. Aid for trade : it also asks that the "aid for trade" strategy benefit all developing countries, and not only those agreeing to a greater liberalisation of their markets, notably in the context of Economic Partnership Agreements Aid and the environment : moreover, it calls for an assessment of the impact of the development policies on climate change, desertification and biodiversity in the countries concerned. Gender equality : the Parliament recalls that the European Consensus for Development recognises gender equality as a goal in its own right, and as a key area for discussion on aid effectiveness. Therefore, a strong gender perspective must be integrated at every stage of the programming, implementation, monitoring and evaluation levels of aid programmes. Impact of foreign diasporas on aid effectiveness : the Parliament recalls the decisive role that can be played by members of diasporas in improving the effectiveness of aid and therefore calls on the Commission and the Member States to involve them more in implementing European development programmes . In addition, it stresses that the involvement of foreigners in a partnership between the EU and their country of origin is a powerful factor of integration . Improving transparency : the Parliament also insists on the transparency of information on aid flows and asks that the timely public dissemination of complete information on all aid committed, allocated and disbursed be ensured.
The Committee on Development unanimously adopted the own-initiative report by Johan VAN HECKE (ALDE, BE) on the follow-up to the Paris Declaration of 2005 on Aid Effectiveness, calling on Member States and the Commission to ensure that the EU speaks with one voice in terms of development, in order to make their actions more harmonised, transparent, predictable and collectively effective. In particular, MEPs consider that the Commission should focus its development policy on poverty eradication and results .
Concerned about the rise in the prices of raw materials and the current global food crisis, MEPs call on the Commission and each Member State to support any measure which can help to stabilise raw material prices for developing countries. They also call for better integration of new Member States into the EU development policy, recalling that these Member States have committed themselves to Official Development Assistance (ODA) targets of 0.17% of GNI by 2010 and 0.33% by 2015. At the same time, MEPs examine the development policy as a whole and make a series of comments on the following points:
MDGs (Millennium Development Goals): MEPs call on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that EU policies as well as the aid architecture support the Paris Declaration principle of managing for results. In particular, they call for the creation and implementation of innovative financing mechanisms to contribute to attaining the MDGs, while ensuring that these additional resources do not replace the commitments already given in terms of public development aid. MEPs stress the particular need for improvement of the health MDGs, while recognising that most of the MDG targets will not be met by 2015; Rationalise aid and improve effectiveness : MEPs call on the Commission to devise a matrix of all the financial instruments from which it has awarded funds for good governance, whether from the European Development Fund (EDF), the DCI, the EU-Africa Strategy or the funding allocated to African governments for good governance, in order to check the consistency of policies and the sound management of these funds; Division of labour : in order to further improve the effectiveness of aid granted, MEPs call on the Member States to promote the division of labour agenda, as set out in the Code of Conduct on Division of Labour (Commission Communication entitled “EU Code of Conduct on Division of Labour in Development Policy” - see COM(2007)0072 ). They stress that the division of labour should be country-led, based on the Paris Declaration principles and results-focused and lead to sufficient financing of all sectors in each partner country; Improve democratic control of aid : MEPs believe that it is necessary to improve the control measures for aid granted, particularly by giving all partner countries the opportunity to better manage parliamentary control over the effectiveness of aid. It is also necessary that the EU provide resources and capacity development support to developing country parliaments to ensure that they have sufficient capacity to engage in scrutiny and oversight of their governments' budgets. They also stress the need for the international financial institutions and donor countries to publish the conditions for granting development aid, so that genuine democratic control can be exercised by parliaments, local authorities and civil society. Budget support : MEPs support the choice of the Commission to increasingly use budget support. At the same time, MEPs call on the Commission to improve the clarity of the definitions relating to the ODA sectoral allocations so as to improve consistency of the results, by ensuring that there is no widening of ODA definitions to include items such as military spending. Fighting corruption : MEPs recall that corruption is a major obstacle to greater aid effectiveness. Therefore, greater transparency of countries' public financial management systems is necessary, as well as practical measures by civil society, to ensure that aid provided by the EU reaches the rightful aid recipients. Simplification of procedures : MEPs call on the Commission to continue to simplify procedures, including aid delivery processes and to further decentralise responsibility by providing the delegations with sufficient capacity to monitor the granting of aid on the ground. They support the role played by the Commission in terms of coordinating development aid among Member States and they emphasise the added value provided by the Commission in taking a leading role in the political dialogue between the EU and the partner countries. Basic public services : once again, MEPs call for at least 20% of development aid to be devoted to improving basic public services such as education, health, access to water and sanitation. Untying and conditionality of development aid : once again, MEPs call for the complete untying of aid, as they have done for years (particularly technical assistance, food aid and food transport aid) and insist on the gradual phasing out of policy-oriented conditionality of aid, especially economic policy conditionality, to support a common understanding on key priorities. In particular, they emphasise the need to disburse aid according to partners’ own priorities and timetables. Funding of aid : MEPs call for incremental and predictable funding, in the form of multi-year (3 years or more) aid commitments, which are based on clear and transparent criteria and poverty eradication outcomes. Aid for trade : MEPs ask particularly that the aid for trade strategy benefit all developing countries, and not only those agreeing to a greater liberalisation of their markets, notably in the context of Economic Partnership Agreements. Aid and the environment : MEPs also call upon the Commission to assess the impact of development policies on climate change, desertification and biodiversity in the countries concerned. Gender equality : MEPs recall that the European Consensus for Development recognises gender equality as a goal in its own right, and as a key area for discussion on aid effectiveness. Therefore, a strong gender perspective must be included at every stage of the programming, implementation, monitoring and evaluation levels of aid programmes. Improving transparency : MEPs insist on the transparency of information on aid flows and call for the timely public dissemination of complete information on all aid committed, allocated and disbursed to be ensured.
More generally, MEPs emphasise that aid reform is only one of the steps that the EU must take along with making its trade, security, migration, agriculture, fisheries, energy, environment, climate change and other policies coherent with development objectives in order to benefit developing countries and to promote a fair international financial and trade system in favour of development. Lastly, they recall that the agendas of aid quantity and aid quality are inextricably linked, and that aid effectiveness targets can only be met if the Commission and the Member States reconfirm their commitment to achieving their collective target for ODA of 0.56% of GNI in 2010 and 0.7% of GNI in 2015.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4116
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3593/2
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0237/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0171/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0171/2008
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE405.733
- Committee draft report: PE402.524
- Committee draft report: PE402.524
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE405.733
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0171/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)3593/2
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)4116
Activities
- Johan VAN HECKE
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Christopher BEAZLEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Josep BORRELL FONTELLES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gabriela CREȚU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ana GOMES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pedro GUERREIRO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alain HUTCHINSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mikel IRUJO AMEZAGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Filip KACZMAREK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rodi KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria MARTENS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marianne MIKKO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gay MITCHELL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Luisa MORGANTINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eoin RYAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paul RÜBIG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tokia SAÏFI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Toomas SAVI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pierre SCHAPIRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Olle SCHMIDT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anne VAN LANCKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alejo VIDAL-QUADRAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renate WEBER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Anna ZÁBORSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Rapport Van Hecke A6-0171/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
98 |
2008/2048(INI)
2008/04/22
DEVE
98 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 - having regard to Article 1
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the EU commitments to give more and better aid should include increase of its aid to 0,56% Official Development Assistance (ODA) / Gross National Income by 2010
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas between 2006 and 2007 the percentage of European GNP devoted to public development aid fell for the first time since 2000, from 0.41% to 0.38%, and whereas the EU must therefore redouble its efforts to attain the objective set in the Millennium Development Goals of devoting 0.7% of Europe's GNP to public development aid in 2015,
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Article 180 of the EC Treaty, reinforced by Article 188 D of the Treaty of Lisbon requires that the Union's development cooperation policy and that of the Member States complement and reinforce each other', requiring the Member States and the Union to strive towards enhanced donor coordination and a better division of labour, which will contribute to greater aid effectiveness,
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas Article 188 D of the Treaty of Lisbon requires that the Union's development cooperation policy and that of the Member States complement and reinforce each other', requiring the Member States and the Union to strive towards enhanced donor coordination and a better division of labour (mindful of the primacy of Member States’ nationally determined priorities), which will contribute to greater aid effectiveness,
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas there is a risk that the ambitious objectives of the European Consensus for Development, including other political ones like migration and trade, could diffuse a focus on development and undermine the consensus achieved in the international aid agenda on poverty reduction as a result of lack of consistency between the various EU policies, and whereas in this context Paragraph 35 of the European Consensus for Development states, 'it is important that non-development policies assist developing countries' efforts in achieving the MDGs',
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Ha (new) Ha. whereas the brain drain has led to a critical shortage of health workers and other key skilled personnel in developing countries which in turn frequently prevents aid effecting results on the ground,
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas this situation could be an obstacle to effective aid provision
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas in the coming years, one of the institutional challenges is how to best
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital L L. whereas the current system of allocating aid too often falls short, with many poor countries and critical issues, such as health, education, social cohesion and gender equality, receiving small aid allocations,
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M M. whereas the EU is committed to tackling the question of ‘orphaned’ or neglected countries and sectors in the context of its above-mentioned Code of Conduct on Division of Labour, beginning to look at allocations into situations of fragility,
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2a (new) - having regard to its Resolution on EU's Aid for Trade1 of 23 May 2007, ________________________ 1 Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2007)0203.
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas a large number of studies have shown that effective accountability for the use of aid involving citizen participation is one of the main indicators of aid effectiveness but still, aid is suffering from lack of transparency and openness; whereas this lack of transparency hampers access to information for governments, local authorities and civil society in the recipient countries and in this sense constitutes a major obstacle to better appropriation of aid,
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital P P. whereas aid is often disbursed according to donors’ own priorities and timetables,
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital S a (new) Sa. whereas local authorities are essential players in development policies, as their expertise and knowledge of local needs enable them to pass on, on a daily basis, the expectations of the people and to bridge the gap between the latter and the State,
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Sa (new) Sa. whereas the role of civil society is essential, both as a partner in the political dialogue on aid effectiveness and setting aid priorities, and as “watchdog” for monitoring government spending,
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital S b (new) Sb. whereas the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) provides for no more than 15% of the thematic credit line for non-State actors and local authorities to be assigned to the latter and whereas this favourable trend, which is likely to render aid more effective, should be accompanied by greater recourse to decentralised cooperation on the part of Member States,
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital U U. whereas aid effectiveness
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital U U. whereas improving the quality of aid and increasing the quantity of aid are both vital for achieving the MDGs and aid effectiveness cannot be a pretext for not reaching the commitments that the Member States made according to the Monterrey agreements in 2002,
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Ua (new) Ua. whereas the European Consensus on Development recognises gender equality as a goal in its own right and commits the EU to strengthening its approach to gender equality in all EU development cooperation and whereas the EC Communication on Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Development Cooperation commits EU donors to ensure the effective implementation of strategies and practices that genuinely deliver for women,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital U b (new) Ub. whereas local, national, regional and global peace is attainable and is inextricably linked with the advancement of women, as they are a fundamental force not only for family life and the education of children but also for public initiatives, conflict resolution and the promotion of lasting peace at all levels, as indicated in Article 18 of the Beijing Declaration,
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Member States and the Commission together to make every effort to ensure that the EU speaks with one voice, to align aid delivery with partner countries' priorities and to make their actions more harmonized, transparent and collectively effective;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 15a (new) - having regard to the United Nations Millennium Development Goals Report 2007,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Member States and the Commission together to make every effort to ensure that the EU speaks with one voice where appropriate, to align aid delivery and to make their actions more harmonized, transparent and collectively effective;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Member States and the Commission together to make every effort to ensure that the EU speaks with one voice, to align aid delivery and to make their actions more harmonized, transparent, predictable and collectively effective;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that the Commission will need
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that the implementation of the Paris Declaration of 2005 on Aid Effectiveness - which endorsed the terms of Article 9 of the Beijing Declaration - including in the context of the legislation of the various States and thanks to the formulation of development strategies, policies, programmes and priorities, is a matter for which each State bears sovereign responsibility, and whereas, while respecting all human rights and fundamental freedoms and taking account of and respecting strictly the various religious and ethical values, the cultural heritage and the philosophical convictions of individuals and their communities, each State should help women to enjoy their fundamental rights fully in order to attain equality, development and peace;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Stresses that the rise in the prices of raw materials played a crucial role in triggering the current global food crisis, which is in danger of obliterating all the efforts already made to improve the effectiveness of aid, and calls on the Commission and each Member State to support any measure which can help to stabilise raw material prices for developing countries;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission to help integrate new members into the increasingly coordinated, international approaches to development policy and delivery with the appropriate mechanisms and to explore the way forward for possible joint programming exercises; recalls in this context that the new Member States have committed themselves to public development aid targets of 0.17% of GNI by 2010 and 0.33% by 2015, while their future contributions must reinforce the role of the EU in development cooperation;
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission: to help integrate new members into the increasingly coordinated, international approaches to development policy and delivery with the appropriate mechanisms
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises the crucial role of democratic ownership and parliamentary oversight within developing countries for ensuring aid effectiveness, the need for the EU to provide resources and capacity development support to developing country parliaments to ensure that they have sufficient capacity to engage in scrutiny and oversight of their governments' budgets and the importance that better reporting of the results to the European Parliament and the Member States can help build confidence in Community programmes and permit more strategic forms of oversight; in this respect, calls on the Commission to propose a new indicator (the 'Paris Declaration 13th indicator') to monitor Parliamentary scrutiny;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises the importance that better reporting of the results to the European Parliament, civil society and the Member States can help build confidence in Community programmes, increase accountability and permit more strategic forms of oversight; in this respect, calls on the Commission to propose a new indicator (the 'Paris Declaration 13th indicator') to monitor Parliamentary scrutiny;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Recognises the importance that better reporting of the results to the European Parliament and the Member States can help build confidence in Community programmes and permit more strategic forms of oversight; in this respect, calls on
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas this situation leads to low levels of ownership, less effective programmes and developing countries being greatly overloaded with donor demands, a division between so called donor 'darlings' and 'orphans', and the neglecting of crucial sectors such as health, education and gender-friendly programmes,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission and the Member States jointly to identify performance indicators geared to the MDG indicators, in particular with regard to budgetary aid, so that national parliaments, local authorities and local civil society, as well as the European Parliament, can trace back the results of EU contributions;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that EU policies as well as the aid architecture support the Paris Principle of managing for results, particularly to achieve results in the MDGs least likely to be fulfilled according to the UN Millennium Development Goals Report 2007, such as MDG5;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Commission to devise a matrix of all the financial instruments from which it has awarded funds for good governance, whether from the EDF, the DCI, the EU-Africa Strategy or the funding allocated to African governments for good governance, in order to check the consistency of policies and the sound management of these funds;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Calls on the Commission and Member States to support the creation and implementation of innovative financing mechanisms to contribute significantly to attaining the MDGs within the deadlines set; stresses that these additional resources cannot replace the commitments already given in terms of public development aid;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5d (new) 5d. Supports the choice of the Commission to increasingly use budget support, but at the same time encourages the Commission to further investigate the challenges of this aid modality;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Member States and its National Parliaments to put forward the division of labour and the Code of Conduct agenda
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6a (new) 6a. Stresses that the division of labour should be country-led, based on the Paris Declaration principles and results-focused and lead to sufficient financing of all sectors in each partner country;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Recalls that corruption, by diverting the funds intended for development, is a major obstacle to greater aid effectiveness; calls on the Commission to improve monitoring of the allocation of development aid and to encourage aid recipients to ratify and apply strictly the international and regional agreements applicable in this field;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to ensure greater
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas this situation of underperformance leads to low levels of ownership, less effective programmes and developing countries being greatly overloaded with donor demands,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission and Council to take practical measures to fight corruption, particularly by supporting civil-society initiatives intended to ensure transparency of the use made of the aid provided by the European Union and by urging all Member States and partner States to ratify the UN Convention against Corruption of 2003;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Supports the role that the Commission is playing in order to harmonize development co
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Supports the role that the Commission is playing in order to
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to continue to simplify procedures, including aid delivery processes, to further decentralise responsibility and to provide the delegations with sufficient capacity (staff and skills) and more control or influence over the shape and approval procedure of the thematic and regional budget lines to fulfil their responsibilities; suggests including partner governments, parliaments and civil society organisations in a mapping of cumbersome procedures and possible solutions;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to continue to simplify procedures, to further decentralise responsibility and to provide the delegations with sufficient capacity (staff and skills) and more control or influence over the shape and approval procedure of the thematic and regional budget lines to fulfil their responsibilities; highlights the importance of equipping the future European External Action Service with sufficient development-oriented capacity;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to continue to simplify procedures, to further decentralise responsibility and to provide the delegations with sufficient capacity (staff and skills)
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission also to encourage regular contact and shared work between its delegations and civil society and local authorities, in order to take better account of the needs and priorities of the partner countries and thus promote better appropriation of aid, which is the prime objective of the Paris Declaration;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses the need for
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Stresses the need for developing guidelines and methodology for monitoring the Paris Declaration in order to improve collective understanding of the Paris agenda and ensure the consistent aggregation of information on indicators across the main countries receiving aid; stresses therefore the need to use precise indicators for interim assessments, the results of which will permit the readjustment and/or intensification of the actions necessary to attain the objectives set for 2010;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11a (new) 11a. Notes the forthcoming Third High Level Roundtable on Aid Effectiveness in Accra this September, and in this regard acknowledges the importance of the Development Gateway (a not-for-profit foundation originally established by the World Bank but totally separate for over five years), which is the only ICT4D (Information and Communications Technology for Development) organisation that systematically seeks to support the international aid effectiveness agenda through the provision of web- based tools to strengthen country systems (financial management, procurement statistics); and therefore calls on the Commission to implement the Paris agenda through stronger support for NGOs such as the Development Gateway, including through membership to of Development Gateway International (the European Office of Development Gateway), based in Brussels, and its Aid Effectiveness Steering Committee (chaired by the OECD Development Assistance Committee and also comprising the World Bank and UNDP);
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the EU supplies more than half
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to improve the clarity of the definitions (ODA sectorial allocation) so as to improve consistency of the results and reduce the transaction costs of managing the Commission and Member States data at country level; urges the Commission and the Member States to exclude debt cancellation, particularly cancellation of export credit debts, money spent in Europe on students and refugees from aid figures from ODA;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission to improve the clarity of the definitions (ODA sectorial allocation) so as to improve consistency of the results and reduce the transaction costs of managing the Commission and Member States data at country level; calls on the Commission to ensure that there is no widening of ODA definitions to include non-aid items such as military spending;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Calls on the Commission and Member States, in accordance with the commitment given at the world summit on social development in Copenhagen in 1995, to comply with the call by civil- society organisations for at least 20% of development aid to be devoted to improving basic public services such as education, health, access to water and sanitation;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Calls on members of the OECD's DAC, which is the relevant authority, to formulate as soon as possible a definition of development cooperation which can put a permanent end to the diversion of aid for use for purposes which have nothing to do with development, as this diversion is made possible only by the extremely broad nature of the current official definition of development aid;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on the Commission and the Members States to completely untie their aid in line with the DAC recommendation of 2001 for countries eligible under the European Development Fund (EDF) and with Article 31 of the DCI Regulation, and on technical assistance, food aid and food transport aid;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to respect real democratic ownership of the development process by
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to respect real democratic ownership of the development process by phasing out economic policy conditionality and by aligning to partner countries' priorities as identified by local governments, parliaments and CSOs;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Stresses the need for the international financial institutions and donor countries to publish the conditions for granting development aid, so that genuine democratic control can be exercised by parliaments, local authorities and civil society;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15b (new) 15b. Acknowledges that ‘democratic ownership’ works both ways, and upholds the legitimacy of economic conditionality in the interests of Member States’ taxpayers, as manifested through their governments’ priorities;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. deeply convinced that economic development, social development and environmental protection are interdependent elements which go hand in hand with sustainable development, which is the background to our efforts to improve the quality of life for all, as provided for in Article 36 of the Beijing Declaration,
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Stresses the need to disburse aid according to
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17a (new) 17a. Stresses the particular need for improvement of the health MDGs for situations of fragility and for DG ECHO and DG Development to coordinate their work throughout the humanitarian aid phase, the transitional phase and the development phase ( Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development) as stated e.g. in the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Recognises the need to intensify the Commission's consultations with civil society partners in headquarters and in the field through better structured meetings on policy, strategic programming and aid effectiveness issues; urges the Commission to plead, at the High Level Forum in Accra, for an additional indicator relating to the extent of the involvement of civil society;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Recognises the need to intensify the Commission's consultations with civil society partners in headquarters and in the field through better structured meetings on policy, strategic programming and aid effectiveness issues; calls on donors and partner governments to ensure the full and meaningful participation of civil society in the planning, implementation, monitoring and assessment of budgets and programs and to support the conditions that are necessary to fulfil their roles;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Recognises the need to intensify the Commission's consultations with civil society partners in headquarters and in the field through better structured meetings on policy, strategic programming and aid effectiveness issues including requirements for calls for proposals, disbursement procedures, financial control of projects, monitoring and evaluation processes;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Recognises the need to intensify the Commission's consultations with civil society partners in headquarters and in the field through better structured meetings on policy, strategic programming and aid effectiveness issues; reaffirms the need to fully involve civil society and local authorities in the formulation, implementation and assessment of development policies;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18.
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18b (new) 18b. Stresses that the involvement of women and the women’s movements in the formulation and delivery of policy and programmes; implementation, monitoring and evaluation should be seen as an integral part of ensuring real ownership, given the disproportionate impact of poverty on women;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Stresses the need to involve Local Authorities of both Members States and EU partners in the process of achieving the goals of the Paris Declaration, particularly at all stages of the formulation, implementation and assessment of development policies;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Recalls the decisive role which can be played by members of diasporas in improving the effectiveness of European aid and therefore calls on the Commission and Member States to involve them more in planning and implementing European development programmes; stresses that the involvement of foreigners or people of foreign origin in a partnership between the European Union and their country of origin is a powerful factor of integration;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new) Db. whereas environmental protection is among the EU's priorities and whereas the Commission must therefore take this objective into account in all the policies it pursues towards developing countries,
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Considers that increasing transparency of information on aid flows is a critical objective for improving the effective use of aid and mutual accountability
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Calls on the Commission and the Members States to make progress in this area by supporting the establishment of accounting standards for disclosure requirements of external assistance and by working with civil society organisations, national parliaments, local authorities and international organisations to set out good practice in recording aid flows in national budgets;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21a (new) 21a. Urges the Commission and the Member States to align their aid to the country system by using general and sectoral budget support, which has to be based on a solid poverty reduction plan that strengthens domestic accountability and which has to be linked to the shared commitment on reducing poverty and achieving the MDGs, on respecting human rights and on strengthening and improving monitoring, financial management and accountability;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Stresses the need to make a multi-year (3 years or more) aid commitments by the Commission and the Member
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Stresses the need
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Stresses the need to make a multi-year (3 years or more) aid commitments by the Commission and the Members States based on clear and transparent criteria agreed with partner countries, and the delivery of those commitments on schedule, in a transparent manner; welcomes the MDG contract as one of the possible ways to increase the predictability of aid;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22a (new) 22a. Notes that in most developing countries, most of the MDG targets will not be met by 2015; and urges Member States to prepare annual timetables to meet the promises they have made;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Recognises the importance to set targets in order to gradually accomplish that 100% of technical assistance is demand-driven and aligned to partners national strategies only when the recipient country is totally democratic, the state apparatus has minimal corruption and there is full transparency and accountability as to how all EU funds have been spent;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Stresses that technical assistance planned in the light of the needs expressed by recipient countries and civil- society organisations rather than the priorities of donor countries should make it possible to increase both the capacities of the EU's partners and local appropriation;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Notes that Aid reform is only one of the steps that the EU must take along with making its trade, security, migration, agriculture and other policies coherently work to benefit developing countries and promoting a fair international financial and trade system in favour of development; recalls in this connection Paragraph 35 of the European Consensus for Development, which states, 'it is important that non-development policies assist developing countries' efforts in achieving the MDGs';
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Ea (new) Ea. whereas recent OECD figures show that overall, EU aid has decreased significantly in 2007,
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Notes that Aid reform is only one of the steps that the EU must take along with making its trade, security, migration, agriculture, fisheries, energy, environment, climate change and other policies coherently work with the development objectives to benefit developing countries and promoting a fair international financial and trade system in favour of development;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Notes that Aid reform is only one of the steps that the EU must take along with making its trade, security, migration, agriculture and other policies coherent
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Recalls the commitments given by countries which are signatories to the Paris Declaration to perform strategic environmental assessments at sectoral and national level; calls on the Commission, therefore, to respect this objective with a view to assessing the impact of its policies, particularly on climate change, desertification and biodiversity in developing countries;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24b. Stresses that efforts to render aid effective should be accompanied by better information of the citizens of donor countries regarding the aims, methods of implementation and recipients of development aid;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24c (new) 24c. Recalls that the European Consensus on Development recognises gender equality as a goal in its own right, and therefore should be a key area for discussion on aid effectiveness;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Notes that the aid effectiveness debate should not be understood as against the scaling up of aid as both issues are closely interrelated; urges the Commission and the Member States to reconfirm their commitment of achieving its collective target of 0.56% in 2010 and 0.7% in 2015, to scale up aid and to set ambitious multi- annual timetables to measure the gradual rise in aid budgets;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25a (new) 25a. Stresses the importance of including a strong gender perspective at every stage of the programming, implementation, monitoring and evaluation levels;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25b (new) 25b. Recognises that the agendas of aid quantity and aid quality are inextricably linked, and that for aid effectiveness targets to be met, there must be continued commitment to existing quantity targets as agreed to by all EU Member States;
source: PE-405.733
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15002&j=0&l=enNew
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15002&j=1&l=en |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE402.524New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE402.524 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE405.733New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE405.733 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0171_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0171_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=15002&j=1&l=en
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080522&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080522&type=CRE |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-171&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0171_EN.html |
docs/3/body |
EC
|
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-171&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0171_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-237New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0237_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
DEVE/6/59264New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
Follow-up of the Paris Declaration of 2005 on Aid EffectivenessNew
Follow-up of the Paris Declaration of 2005 on aid effectiveness |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|