BETA


2008/2054(INI) Financial aspects of the Reform Treaty

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead BUDG GUY-QUINT Catherine (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion AFET SZENT-IVÁNYI István (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion CONT
Committee Opinion AGRI MULDER Jan (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion AFCO
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 052, RoP 052-p4

Events

2009/11/11
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2009/05/07
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2009/05/07
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 442 votes to 86, with 15 abstentions a resolution on the financial aspects of the Lisbon Treaty. Overall, Parliament welcomes the changes brought about by the Lisbon Treaty but draws attention to the need to adapt interinstitutional conciliation mechanisms and internal cooperation procedures to enable Parliament to exercise its new powers to the full.

Own resources : Members regret the fact that Member States have failed to take the opportunity to establish a system of genuine own resources which is fairer and more readily understandable to the public. They criticise, in particular, the fact that no progress has been made in involving Parliament in the process of determining the limits to and the nature of the own resources available to the Union.

Multiannual financial framework : Parliament welcomes the formal status granted in the Lisbon Treaty to the MFF, which becomes a legally binding act. It criticises, however, the fact that the Lisbon Treaty has retained the requirement that the Council should act unanimously when adopting the MFF, rendering the decision-making procedure very difficult and encouraging negotiations on the basis of the ‘lowest common denominator’. Parliament urges the European Council to make use of the provision which enables it, by means of a unanimous decision, to impose a switch to qualified-majority voting for the adoption of the MFF.

Members also criticise the fact that under the new procedure, Parliament has only a right of approval and no genuine power of co decision. They call on the Council to demonstrate its willingness to develop a structured political dialogue with Parliament in order to take full account of the latter’s priorities.

With regard to the duration of the MFF , Parliament supports the switch to a five-year MFF, but is aware that a full coincidence between the MFF and the term of the European Parliament and the term of office of the Commission might be difficult, as it considers a negotiating period of at least one year may be necessary to allow each new Parliament and each new Commission to take fundamental financial policy decisions during their terms of office. Negotiations should be conducted in such a way as to allow the institutions to envisage the entry into force of a new MFF in 2016.

Emphasising that the legally binding nature of the MFF necessitates, even more than before, the introduction of more flexible implementing arrangements, Parliament discusses the importance of strengthening flexibility mechanisms operating within and between each heading and through specific flexibility instruments which can be mobilised outside the margins. It also draws attention to the need, in good time prior to the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, for the institutions to reach agreement on the arrangements for making the transition from the current interinstitutional agreement to an MFF contained in a legislative act.

Annual budgetary procedure : the resolution welcomes the abolition of the distinction between compulsory expenditure (CE) and non-compulsory expenditure (NCE), as a result of which Parliament now has the right to take decisions concerning all Union expenditure on an equal footing with the Council. Members note that the strengthening of the role of the Commission.

Parliament goes on to note that the new procedure with its single reading will require Parliament to fine tune its political priorities at an earlier stage and adapt accordingly its operational approach and organisational arrangements so as to enable it to achieve all the objectives set. It also emphasises the importance which the Conciliation Committee will have in the future as the body in which political disagreements between the two arms of the budgetary authority are resolved.

Relations with the legislative authority : Members emphasise that the parallelism between the extension of Parliament’s budgetary powers to cover all Union expenditure and the widening of the codecision procedure to encompass almost all legislation calls for greater account to be taken of the budgetary dimension to legislative activity. Accordingly, it is essential that cooperation between the Committee on Budgets and the sectoral committees should be stepped up in order to take due account of the financial impact of Parliament’s legislative activity, in particular its impact on the MFF and the annual budget.

Financial Regulation : the Financial Regulation should incorporate all the provisions needed to define the budgetary procedure. Parliament feels that such provisions would cover the functioning of the Conciliation Committee, the mechanism triggering conciliation, and the updating of the provisions of the Financial Regulation directly affected by the changes introduced by the Lisbon Treaty. It is vital that the institutions should reach a political agreement on these matters in due time so that, once the Lisbon Treaty has entered into force, the requisite changes to the Financial Regulation can quickly be made using the new procedure.

Budgetary impact of the interinstitutional changes : Parliament emphasises the importance of reaching a political agreement with the Council in due time on funding arrangements for the European Council, and its fixed Presidency, and for the future European External Action Service. All external actions should be financed from Community appropriations, and only exceptionally – in the event of an emergency – on the basis of contributions outside the Union budget.

Coordination with national budgets : Members wish to invite national parliaments to take part in a joint public debate on national and Community budgetary policy guidelines, prior to consideration of the respective draft budgets, in order to establish from the outset a common framework for coordination of Member States" national policies, while also taking into account the Community contribution.

Documents
2009/05/07
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2009/05/06
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2009/03/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2009/03/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2009/03/11
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The Committee on Budgets adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Catherine GUY-QUINT (PES, FR) on the financial aspects of the Lisbon Treaty. Overall, the committee welcomes the changes brought about by the Lisbon Treaty but draws attention to the need to adapt interinstitutional conciliation mechanisms and internal cooperation procedures to enable Parliament to exercise its new powers to the full.

Own resources : the report criticises the fact that Member States have failed to take the opportunity to establish a system of genuine own resources which is fairer and more readily understandable to the public. It criticises, in particular, the fact that no progress has been made in involving Parliament in the process of determining the limits to and the nature of the own resources available to the Union.

Multiannual financial framework : the report welcomes the formal status granted in the Lisbon Treaty to the MFF, which becomes a legally binding act. It criticises, however, the fact that the Lisbon Treaty has retained the requirement that the Council should act unanimously when adopting the MFF, rendering the decision-making procedure very difficult and encouraging negotiations on the basis of the ‘lowest common denominator’. The committee urges the European Council to make use of the provision which enables it, by means of a unanimous decision, to impose a switch to qualified-majority voting for the adoption of the MFF.

Members also criticise the fact that under the new procedure, Parliament has only a right of approval and no genuine power of co decision. They call on the Council to demonstrate its willingness to develop a structured political dialogue with Parliament in order to take full account of the latter’s priorities.

With regard to the duration of the MFF , the committee supports the switch to a five-year MFF, but is aware that a full coincidence between the MFF and the term of the European Parliament and the term of Office of the Commission might be difficult, as it considers a negotiating period of at least one year may be necessary to allow each new Parliament and each new Commission to take fundamental financial policy decisions during their terms of office. Negotiations should be conducted in such a way as to allow the institutions to envisage the entry into force of a new MFF in 2016.

The report discusses the importance of strengthening flexibility mechanisms operating within and between each heading and through specific flexibility instruments which can be mobilised outside the margins. It also draws attention to the need, in good time prior to the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, for the institutions to reach agreement on the arrangements for making the transition from the current interinstitutional agreement to an MFF contained in a legislative act.

Annual budgetary procedure : the report welcomes the abolition of the distinction between compulsory expenditure (CE) and non-compulsory expenditure (NCE), as a result of which Parliament now has the right to take decisions concerning all Union expenditure on an equal footing with the Council. It notes that the changes to the annual budgetary procedure should serve to make it simpler by laying down the principle of a single reading for each institution and by introducing a number of mechanisms designed to help the two arms of the budgetary authority reach agreement, which will decrease bureaucracy. Members note that the strengthening of the role of the Commission.

The committee goes on to note that the new procedure will require Parliament to fine tune its political priorities at an earlier stage and adapt accordingly its operational approach and organisational arrangements so as to enable it to achieve all the objectives set. It also emphasises the importance which the Conciliation Committee will have in the future as the body in which political disagreements between the two arms of the budgetary authority are resolved.

Relations with the legislative authority : Members emphasise that the parallelism between the extension of Parliament’s budgetary powers to cover all Union expenditure and the widening of the codecision procedure to encompass almost all legislation calls for greater account to be taken of the budgetary dimension to legislative activity. Accordingly, it is essential that cooperation between the Committee on Budgets and the sectoral committees should be stepped up in order to take due account of the financial impact of Parliament’s legislative activity, in particular its impact on the MFF and the annual budget.

Financial Regulation : the Financial Regulation should incorporate all the provisions needed to define the budgetary procedure. The committee feels that such provisions would cover the functioning of the Conciliation Committee, the mechanism triggering conciliation, and the updating of the provisions of the Financial Regulation directly affected by the changes introduced by the Lisbon Treaty. It is vital that the institutions should reach a political agreement on these matters in due time so that, once the Lisbon Treaty has entered into force, the requisite changes to the Financial Regulation can quickly be made using the new procedure.

Budgetary impact of the interinstitutional changes : the committee emphasises the importance of reaching a political agreement with the Council in due time on funding arrangements for the European Council, and its fixed Presidency, and for the future European External Action Service. All external actions should be financed from Community appropriations, and only exceptionally – in the event of an emergency – on the basis of contributions outside the Union budget.

Coordination with national budgets : Members wish to invite e national parliaments to take part in a joint public debate on national and Community budgetary policy guidelines, prior to consideration of the respective draft budgets.

2009/02/24
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2009/02/02
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2008/06/20
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2008/05/27
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2008/04/02
   EP - SZENT-IVÁNYI István (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2008/03/13
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2008/01/23
   EP - GUY-QUINT Catherine (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2008/01/21
   EP - MULDER Jan (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
57 2008/2054(INI)
2008/05/07 AGRI 4 amendments...
source: PE-405.959
2008/06/12 AFET 2 amendments...
source: PE-407.705
2009/02/02 BUDG 51 amendments...
source: PE-419.898

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: GUY-QUINT Catherine date: 2008-01-23T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2008-01-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GUY-QUINT Catherine group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István date: 2008-04-02T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2008-04-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
rapporteur
name: MULDER Jan date: 2008-01-21T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2008-01-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MULDER Jan group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-183&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0183_EN.html
docs/5/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-183&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0183_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-374
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0374_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2008-03-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-04-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2008-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2008-01-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: GUY-QUINT Catherine body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-04-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2008-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2008-01-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: GUY-QUINT Catherine body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-183&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0183/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-05-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090506&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-05-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16995&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-374 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0374/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: GRYBAUSKAITĖ Dalia
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2008-01-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GUY-QUINT Catherine group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2008-04-02T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AFET
date
2008-04-02T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AGRI
date
2008-01-21T00:00:00
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2008-01-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MULDER Jan group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
BUDG
date
2008-01-23T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: PSE name: GUY-QUINT Catherine
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
docs
  • date: 2008-05-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.662&secondRef=02 title: PE404.662 committee: AGRI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2008-06-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.858 title: PE407.858 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2009-02-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE419.898 title: PE419.898 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2009-02-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE406.136&secondRef=03 title: PE406.136 committee: AFET type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-183&language=EN title: A6-0183/2009 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-11-11T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=16995&j=0&l=en title: SP(2009)3564 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2008-03-13T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Budgets adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Catherine GUY-QUINT (PES, FR) on the financial aspects of the Lisbon Treaty. Overall, the committee welcomes the changes brought about by the Lisbon Treaty but draws attention to the need to adapt interinstitutional conciliation mechanisms and internal cooperation procedures to enable Parliament to exercise its new powers to the full. Own resources : the report criticises the fact that Member States have failed to take the opportunity to establish a system of genuine own resources which is fairer and more readily understandable to the public. It criticises, in particular, the fact that no progress has been made in involving Parliament in the process of determining the limits to and the nature of the own resources available to the Union. Multiannual financial framework : the report welcomes the formal status granted in the Lisbon Treaty to the MFF, which becomes a legally binding act. It criticises, however, the fact that the Lisbon Treaty has retained the requirement that the Council should act unanimously when adopting the MFF, rendering the decision-making procedure very difficult and encouraging negotiations on the basis of the ‘lowest common denominator’. The committee urges the European Council to make use of the provision which enables it, by means of a unanimous decision, to impose a switch to qualified-majority voting for the adoption of the MFF. Members also criticise the fact that under the new procedure, Parliament has only a right of approval and no genuine power of co decision. They call on the Council to demonstrate its willingness to develop a structured political dialogue with Parliament in order to take full account of the latter’s priorities. With regard to the duration of the MFF , the committee supports the switch to a five-year MFF, but is aware that a full coincidence between the MFF and the term of the European Parliament and the term of Office of the Commission might be difficult, as it considers a negotiating period of at least one year may be necessary to allow each new Parliament and each new Commission to take fundamental financial policy decisions during their terms of office. Negotiations should be conducted in such a way as to allow the institutions to envisage the entry into force of a new MFF in 2016. The report discusses the importance of strengthening flexibility mechanisms operating within and between each heading and through specific flexibility instruments which can be mobilised outside the margins. It also draws attention to the need, in good time prior to the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, for the institutions to reach agreement on the arrangements for making the transition from the current interinstitutional agreement to an MFF contained in a legislative act. Annual budgetary procedure : the report welcomes the abolition of the distinction between compulsory expenditure (CE) and non-compulsory expenditure (NCE), as a result of which Parliament now has the right to take decisions concerning all Union expenditure on an equal footing with the Council. It notes that the changes to the annual budgetary procedure should serve to make it simpler by laying down the principle of a single reading for each institution and by introducing a number of mechanisms designed to help the two arms of the budgetary authority reach agreement, which will decrease bureaucracy. Members note that the strengthening of the role of the Commission. The committee goes on to note that the new procedure will require Parliament to fine tune its political priorities at an earlier stage and adapt accordingly its operational approach and organisational arrangements so as to enable it to achieve all the objectives set. It also emphasises the importance which the Conciliation Committee will have in the future as the body in which political disagreements between the two arms of the budgetary authority are resolved. Relations with the legislative authority : Members emphasise that the parallelism between the extension of Parliament’s budgetary powers to cover all Union expenditure and the widening of the codecision procedure to encompass almost all legislation calls for greater account to be taken of the budgetary dimension to legislative activity. Accordingly, it is essential that cooperation between the Committee on Budgets and the sectoral committees should be stepped up in order to take due account of the financial impact of Parliament’s legislative activity, in particular its impact on the MFF and the annual budget. Financial Regulation : the Financial Regulation should incorporate all the provisions needed to define the budgetary procedure. The committee feels that such provisions would cover the functioning of the Conciliation Committee, the mechanism triggering conciliation, and the updating of the provisions of the Financial Regulation directly affected by the changes introduced by the Lisbon Treaty. It is vital that the institutions should reach a political agreement on these matters in due time so that, once the Lisbon Treaty has entered into force, the requisite changes to the Financial Regulation can quickly be made using the new procedure. Budgetary impact of the interinstitutional changes : the committee emphasises the importance of reaching a political agreement with the Council in due time on funding arrangements for the European Council, and its fixed Presidency, and for the future European External Action Service. All external actions should be financed from Community appropriations, and only exceptionally – in the event of an emergency – on the basis of contributions outside the Union budget. Coordination with national budgets : Members wish to invite e national parliaments to take part in a joint public debate on national and Community budgetary policy guidelines, prior to consideration of the respective draft budgets.
  • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-183&language=EN title: A6-0183/2009
  • date: 2009-05-06T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090506&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-05-07T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16995&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2009-05-07T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-374 title: T6-0374/2009 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 442 votes to 86, with 15 abstentions a resolution on the financial aspects of the Lisbon Treaty. Overall, Parliament welcomes the changes brought about by the Lisbon Treaty but draws attention to the need to adapt interinstitutional conciliation mechanisms and internal cooperation procedures to enable Parliament to exercise its new powers to the full. Own resources : Members regret the fact that Member States have failed to take the opportunity to establish a system of genuine own resources which is fairer and more readily understandable to the public. They criticise, in particular, the fact that no progress has been made in involving Parliament in the process of determining the limits to and the nature of the own resources available to the Union. Multiannual financial framework : Parliament welcomes the formal status granted in the Lisbon Treaty to the MFF, which becomes a legally binding act. It criticises, however, the fact that the Lisbon Treaty has retained the requirement that the Council should act unanimously when adopting the MFF, rendering the decision-making procedure very difficult and encouraging negotiations on the basis of the ‘lowest common denominator’. Parliament urges the European Council to make use of the provision which enables it, by means of a unanimous decision, to impose a switch to qualified-majority voting for the adoption of the MFF. Members also criticise the fact that under the new procedure, Parliament has only a right of approval and no genuine power of co decision. They call on the Council to demonstrate its willingness to develop a structured political dialogue with Parliament in order to take full account of the latter’s priorities. With regard to the duration of the MFF , Parliament supports the switch to a five-year MFF, but is aware that a full coincidence between the MFF and the term of the European Parliament and the term of office of the Commission might be difficult, as it considers a negotiating period of at least one year may be necessary to allow each new Parliament and each new Commission to take fundamental financial policy decisions during their terms of office. Negotiations should be conducted in such a way as to allow the institutions to envisage the entry into force of a new MFF in 2016. Emphasising that the legally binding nature of the MFF necessitates, even more than before, the introduction of more flexible implementing arrangements, Parliament discusses the importance of strengthening flexibility mechanisms operating within and between each heading and through specific flexibility instruments which can be mobilised outside the margins. It also draws attention to the need, in good time prior to the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, for the institutions to reach agreement on the arrangements for making the transition from the current interinstitutional agreement to an MFF contained in a legislative act. Annual budgetary procedure : the resolution welcomes the abolition of the distinction between compulsory expenditure (CE) and non-compulsory expenditure (NCE), as a result of which Parliament now has the right to take decisions concerning all Union expenditure on an equal footing with the Council. Members note that the strengthening of the role of the Commission. Parliament goes on to note that the new procedure with its single reading will require Parliament to fine tune its political priorities at an earlier stage and adapt accordingly its operational approach and organisational arrangements so as to enable it to achieve all the objectives set. It also emphasises the importance which the Conciliation Committee will have in the future as the body in which political disagreements between the two arms of the budgetary authority are resolved. Relations with the legislative authority : Members emphasise that the parallelism between the extension of Parliament’s budgetary powers to cover all Union expenditure and the widening of the codecision procedure to encompass almost all legislation calls for greater account to be taken of the budgetary dimension to legislative activity. Accordingly, it is essential that cooperation between the Committee on Budgets and the sectoral committees should be stepped up in order to take due account of the financial impact of Parliament’s legislative activity, in particular its impact on the MFF and the annual budget. Financial Regulation : the Financial Regulation should incorporate all the provisions needed to define the budgetary procedure. Parliament feels that such provisions would cover the functioning of the Conciliation Committee, the mechanism triggering conciliation, and the updating of the provisions of the Financial Regulation directly affected by the changes introduced by the Lisbon Treaty. It is vital that the institutions should reach a political agreement on these matters in due time so that, once the Lisbon Treaty has entered into force, the requisite changes to the Financial Regulation can quickly be made using the new procedure. Budgetary impact of the interinstitutional changes : Parliament emphasises the importance of reaching a political agreement with the Council in due time on funding arrangements for the European Council, and its fixed Presidency, and for the future European External Action Service. All external actions should be financed from Community appropriations, and only exceptionally – in the event of an emergency – on the basis of contributions outside the Union budget. Coordination with national budgets : Members wish to invite national parliaments to take part in a joint public debate on national and Community budgetary policy guidelines, prior to consideration of the respective draft budgets, in order to establish from the outset a common framework for coordination of Member States" national policies, while also taking into account the Community contribution.
  • date: 2009-05-07T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: GRYBAUSKAITĖ Dalia
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
BUDG/6/60352
New
  • BUDG/6/60352
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.10 Revision of the Treaties, intergovernmental conferences
  • 8.70 Budget of the Union
New
8.10
Revision of the Treaties, intergovernmental conferences
8.70
Budget of the Union
procedure/title
Old
The financial aspects of the Reform Treaty
New
Financial aspects of the Reform Treaty
activities
  • date: 2008-03-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-04-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2008-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2008-01-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: GUY-QUINT Catherine body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
  • date: 2009-03-11T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-04-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2008-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2008-01-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: GUY-QUINT Catherine body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-183&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0183/2009 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2009-05-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090506&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-05-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=16995&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-374 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0374/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2008-04-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2008-01-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MULDER Jan
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2008-01-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PSE name: GUY-QUINT Catherine
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: GRYBAUSKAITĖ Dalia
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
BUDG/6/60352
reference
2008/2054(INI)
title
The financial aspects of the Reform Treaty
legal_basis
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject