Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | REGI | BEAUPUY Jean Marie ( ALDE) | |
Committee Opinion | ECON | ||
Committee Opinion | CONT | CHATZIMARKAKIS Jorgo ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 593 votes to 36, with 32 abstentions a resolution on governance and partnership at national and regional levels and a basis for projects in the sphere of regional policy.
The own-initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Jean Marie BEAUPUY (ALDE, FR) on behalf of the Committee on Regional Development.
The resolution stresses that partnership, which should take account of all relevant communities and groups, can bring benefit and added value to the implementation of cohesion policy through enhanced legitimacy, guaranteed transparency and better absorption of funds. According to MEPs, the practical solutions which our fellow citizens expect to see as regards public services (such as public transport, drinking water, social housing and public education) can be achieved only by means of good governance.
The main points raised in the resolution are as follows:
Governance and Community funds : Parliament calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to fully exploit the potential of the various Community funds (Structural Funds, Community framework programme for research and development, and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development,) whose purpose is to promote regional and urban development with the aim of facilitating integrated funding.
MEPs propose, for reasons of simplification and effectiveness, that a study should be carried out into the feasibility of merging the various Community funds, in particular the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development under the future cohesion policy for the period after 2013.
The Commission and the Member States, together with regional and local authorities and taking due account of the suggestions of potential beneficiaries, are called upon to examine without delay how to simplify and rationalise procedures and how to divide more clearly responsibilities for implementing cohesion policy with a view to reducing the bureaucratic burden on the individuals and bodies involved.
The Commission is called upon to promote the use of Article 56 of the General Regulation on the Structural Funds, which allows for contributions in kind to European Union co-financed projects.
Governance and Partnership : the report calls on the Commission to draw up and submit to the European Parliament an assessment of the implementation of the partnership principle by the Member States, in the context of the drafting of the National Strategic Reference Frameworks and the operational programmes, identifying the factors behind successful and unsuccessful governance.
The Commission is invited to draw up a guide containing a clear definition and assessment criteria as well as setting out instruments, tools and good practices (among others for the selection of partners) designed to facilitate the implementation of effective partnerships, in keeping with the institutional framework specific to each Member State.
Stressing that the partnership process can work only with partners which have the necessary capabilities and resources, the resolution calls on the managing authorities to contribute to the strengthening of those capabilities by allocating appropriate financial resources earmarked for technical assistance for implementing the partnership principle, for example for training, for building up social capital, and for professionalising their partnership activities. The Commission is also called upon to identify good practices and to facilitate their application with a view to improving public involvement ahead of the next programming period.
Lastly, MEPs call on the Member States and managing authorities to involve the partners more closely at an early stage in all the phases of Structural Fund programming and implementation with a view to making better use of their experience and knowledge. They urge the Member States to ensure closer cooperation between public and private sectors through the establishment of public-private partnerships to implement structural funding, given that the potential benefits deriving from public-private partnerships are still largely underexploited.
Multi-level governance : stressing that successful multi-level governance needs to be based on a ‘bottom-up’ approach, MEPs call on local and regional authorities to investigate means to intensify their cooperation and contact with national governments as well as with the Commission, and recommend that regular meetings take place between officials from national, regional and local authorities.
The resolution also urges the Member States to decentralise the implementation of cohesion policy and to delegate responsibility for managing the Structural Funds to regional and local authorities on the basis of agreed terms and criteria which must be met by the authorities in question, with a view to involving them more closely in the work of drafting and implementing the operational programmes.
Governance and the territorial dimension : Parliament calls on those Member States which have not yet amended their national law to make provision for the establishment of the European Grouping for Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) to do so as soon as possible. The Commission is called upon, while examining which NUTS level is most pertinent, to identify the area in which an integrated policy for the development of territories might best be implemented, including: (i) population and labour catchment areas, i.e. towns, suburban areas and the adjacent rural areas; (ii) territories which justify specific thematic approaches (such as mountain ranges, river basins and coastal areas).
Governance and the European Union institutions : MEPs invite the Member States to schedule specific Council sessions involving the ministers responsible for cohesion policy. They welcome the establishment within the Commission of interdepartmental groups such as that on ‘urban policy’ and that on ‘the integrated approach’ and call on the Commission to develop this cross-departmental approach further and to keep Parliament regularly informed.
Tools for promoting successful governance : the Member States and the Commission are invited to support the development of governance training measures, involving all public and private education and training organisations, with a view to addressing the major challenges facing the Community. MEPs take the view that the European networks for exchanges of good practice should broaden their work in the area of governance and partnership and propose the creation of a programme, similar to the ERASMUS programme, for regional and local elected officials.
The Committee on Regional Development adopted an own initiative report by Jean Marie BEAUPUY (ALDE, FR) on governance and partnership at national and regional levels and a basis for projects in the sphere of regional policy.
MEPs stress that partnership, which should take account of all relevant communities and groups, can bring benefit and added value to the implementation of cohesion policy through enhanced legitimacy, guaranteed transparency and better absorption of funds. The main points raised in the report are as follows:
Governance and Community funds : the report calls on national, regional and local authorities to intensify the use of the integrated approach during the current programming period and proposes, in the context of future cohesion policy, that the integrated approach should be made compulsory.
MEPs propose, for reasons of simplification and effectiveness, that a study should be carried out into the feasibility of merging the various Community funds, in particular the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development under the future cohesion policy for the period after 2013.
The Commission and the Member States, together with regional and local authorities and taking due account of the suggestions of potential beneficiaries, are called upon to examine without delay how to simplify and rationalise procedures and how to divide more clearly responsibilities for implementing cohesion policy with a view to reducing the bureaucratic burden on the individuals and bodies involved.
Governance and Partnership : the report calls on the Commission to draw up and submit to the European Parliament an assessment of the implementation of the partnership principle by the Member States, in the context of the drafting of the National Strategic Reference Frameworks and the operational programmes, identifying the factors behind successful and unsuccessful governance.
The Commission is called upon to draw up a guide containing a clear definition and assessment criteria as well as setting out instruments, tools and good practices (among others for the selection of partners) designed to facilitate the implementation of effective partnerships, in keeping with the institutional framework specific to each Member State.
Stressing that the partnership process can work only with partners which have the necessary capabilities and resources, the report calls on the managing authorities to contribute to the strengthening of those capabilities by allocating appropriate financial resources earmarked for technical assistance for implementing the partnership principle, for example for training, for building up social capital, and for professionalising their partnership activities. The Commission is also called upon to identify good practices and to facilitate their application with a view to improving public involvement ahead of the next programming period.
Lastly, MEPs call on the Member States and managing authorities to involve the partners more closely at an early stage in all the phases of Structural Fund programming and implementation with a view to making better use of their experience and knowledge.
Multi-level governance : the report calls on the Member States to develop as quickly as possible the practical measures set out in the First Action Programme for the implementation of the Territorial Agenda of the European Union, with a view to strengthening multi-level governance. It proposes that governance should be included in the First Action Programme, which calls on the European Spatial Planning Observation Network (ESPON) to develop new territorial cohesion indicators.
Stressing that successful multi-level governance needs to be based on a ‘bottom-up’ approach, MEPs call on local and regional authorities to investigate means to intensify their cooperation and contact with national governments as well as with the Commission, and recommend that regular meetings take place between officials from national, regional and local authorities.
Lastly, the report urges the Member States to decentralise the implementation of cohesion policy and to delegate responsibility for managing the Structural Funds to regional and local authorities on the basis of agreed terms and criteria which must be met by the authorities in question, with a view to involving them more closely in the work of drafting and implementing the operational programmes.
Governance and the territorial dimension : MEPs call on those Member States which have not yet amended their national law to make provision for the establishment of the European Grouping for Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) to do so as soon as possible. The Commission is called upon, while examining which NUTS level is most pertinent, to identify the area in which an integrated policy for the development of territories might best be implemented, including: (i) population and labour catchment areas, i.e. towns, suburban areas and the adjacent rural areas; (ii) territories which justify specific thematic approaches (such as mountain ranges, river basins and coastal areas).
Governance and the European Union institutions : the report calls on the Member States to schedule specific Council sessions involving the ministers responsible for cohesion policy. MEPs welcome the establishment within the Commission of interdepartmental groups such as that on ‘urban policy’ and that on ‘the integrated approach’ and call on the Commission to develop this cross-departmental approach further and to keep Parliament regularly informed.
Tools for promoting successful governance : the Member States and the Commission are called upon to support the development of governance training measures, involving all public and private education and training organisations, with a view to addressing the major challenges facing the Community. MEPs take the view that the European networks for exchanges of good practice should broaden their work in the area of governance and partnership and propose the creation of a programme, similar to the ERASMUS programme, for regional and local elected officials.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)6664
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0492/2008
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0356/2008
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0356/2008
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE409.748
- Committee opinion: PE405.961
- Committee draft report: PE409.539
- Committee draft report: PE409.539
- Committee opinion: PE405.961
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE409.748
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0356/2008
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)6664
Votes
Rapport Beaupuy A6-0356/2008 - résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
140 |
2008/2064(INI)
2008/06/17
CONT
2 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Regrets the fact that the implementing provisions for the projects were once again adopted very late and calls on the responsible management authorities, and payment and control agencies to provide for and implement rules designed to simplify administration (e.g. by making more use of flat-rate payments);
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 source: PE-407.988
2008/07/25
REGI
138 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2a (new) - having regard to Article 11 (entitled 'Partnership') of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund1 1 OJ L 210, 31.07.2006, p. 25.
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Ab (new) Ab. whereas the non-profit sector is a crucial element in the partnership process in many countries and it accounts for approximately 5% of G.D.P.;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Urges the Member States to decentralise the implementation of cohesion policy, so that the system of multi-level governance can work effectively and in keeping with the partnership and subsidiarity principles, and calls on them to take the decentralisation measures required;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Urges the Member States to decentralise the implementation and application of cohesion policy, so that the system of multi-level governance can work effectively and in keeping with the subsidiarity principle, and calls on them to take the decentralisation measures required;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Urges the Member States to decentralise the implementation of cohesion policy, so that the system of multi-level governance can work effectively and in keeping with the subsidiarity principle, and calls on them to take the decentralisation measures required, at both legislative and budgetary levels;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13a (new) 13a. Emphasises that regional and local administrative capacity as well as its stability and continuity constitute a precondition for the efficient absorption of funds and to ensure their maximum impact ; calls on Member States to ensure adequate administrative structures and human capital in terms of recruitment, remuneration, training, resources, procedures, transparency and accessibility;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13a (new) 13a. Calls upon the responsible authorities to maximise their efforts to involve civil society as early as possible in the policy planning process and encourages European and national authorities to initiate more campaigns to inform regional and local authorities as well as citizens of their role and impact on the European decision-making process;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Urges the Member States to delegate responsibility for managing the Structural Funds to regional and local authorities with a view to involving them more closely in the work of drafting and implementing the operational programmes
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Urges the Member States to delegate responsibility for managing the Structural Funds to regional and local authorities on the basis of agreed terms and criteria which must be met by the authorities in question, with a view to involving them more closely in the work of drafting and implementing the operational programmes, or, at the very least, to award them grants which enable them to play a full role in the multi-level governance arrangements;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Urges the Member States to delegate responsibility for managing the Structural Funds to regional and local authorities with a view to involving them more closely and by means of formal co-ordination structures in the work of drafting and implementing the operational programmes, or, at the very least, to award them grants which enable them to play a full role in the multi-level governance arrangements;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Urges the Member States within the framework of the global grant to delegate responsibility for managing the Structural Funds to regional and local authorities with a view to involving them more closely in the work of drafting and implementing the operational programmes, or, at the very least, to award them grants which enable them to play a full role in the multi-level governance arrangements;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the extensive participation of the partners mentioned in the Structural Fund Regulation and closer cooperation among the bodies involved in implementing programmes and projects financed from the Structural and Cohesion Funds would serve to make cohesion policy more effective and to increase the leverage effect,
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Stresses the need for the division of responsibilities among the various stakeholders involved in implementing cohesion policy to be more clearly laid down, with a view to avoiding any duplication of effort and thus to securing streamlined, more effective implementation of that policy;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14a (new) Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Calls on those Member States which have not yet amended their national law to make provision for the establishment of the European Grouping for Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) to do so as soon as possible; calls on Member States to ensure that the joint administrative authority for the ECTC is a decentralised agency which is also available to advise project developers on the ground;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the European Commission, w
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the European Commission, without seeking to cast doubt on the relevance of the NUTS II level, to identify the
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the European Commission, without seeking to cast doubt on the relevance of the NUTS II level, to identify the size of area best suited to the implementation of genuine integrated policies for the development of territories as they are experienced subjectively and territories which form the basis for projects, in particular - population and labour catchment areas, i.e. towns and the surrounding rural areas, - territories which justify specific thematic approaches, such as mountain ranges,
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the European Commission, without seeking to cast doubt on the relevance of the NUTS II level, to identify the size of area best suited to the implementation of genuine integrated policies for the development of territories as they are experienced subjectively and territories which form the basis for projects, in particular: - population and labour catchment areas, i.e. towns
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Calls on the European Commission, without seeking to cast doubt on the relevance of the NUTS II level, to identify the size of area best suited to the implementation of genuine integrated policies for the development of territories as they are experienced subjectively and territories which form the basis for
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Notes that within the Council there is no department which has specific responsibility for the strategic monitoring of
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Welcomes the establishment within the Commission of interdepartmental groups such as that on 'urban policy' and that on 'the integrated approach': calls on the Commission to develop this cross-
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20a 20a. Calls on Member States to facilitate direct channels of communication between the Commission and sub- national governments;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Heading between paragraph 21 and 22 Tools for promoting successful governance and partnership
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to support the development of governance and partnership training measures, involving all public and private education and training organisations, with a view to addressing the major challenges facing the Community;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22a (new) 22a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make proper use of spatial planning in order to assist in the facilitation of balanced regional development;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the elected representatives and the national, regional and local civil servants involved in managing operational programmes in the context of cohesion policy to use the financial resources available under these programmes for technical assistance to
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the elected representatives and the national, regional and local civil servants and partners in accordance with Article 11 of the Structural Fund Regulation involved in managing operational programmes in the context of cohesion policy to use the financial resources available under these programmes for technical assistance to arrange training in the forms of government linked to these programmes, in particular project management;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the elected representatives and the national, regional and local civil servants involved in managing operational programmes in the context of cohesion policy to use the financial resources available under these programmes for technical assistance to arrange training in the forms of government linked to these programmes, in particular project management; calls also upon the Commission to ask Member States to give a detailed account of the manner in which they specific financial programmes were used;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas simple and transparent structural funding procedures, with a clear division of responsibilities among all those involved in implementing structural spending, help to make cohesion policy more efficient and effective and to rationalise costs and save time,
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23a (new) 23a. Calls on Member States and the managing authorities to put more emphasis on the dimension of policy learning, including the evaluation phase and lessons learnt, and to appraise it in terms of the strategic policy value it represents rather than its bureaucratic use; considers that a strategic follow-up at European level, with structured identification of best practice, could contribute to better policy and implementation;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Takes the view that the European networks for exchanges of good practice should broaden their work in the area of governance and partnership and should ensure public access to exchange of experience in all EU languages and thus help to ensure that good practices are in fact implemented;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Takes the view that the European networks for exchanges of
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 25 25. Welcomes the launching by the French Council Presidency of a project to draw up a set of benchmarks for urban
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Proposes the creation of an ERASMUS programme for local elected officials and for the partners in accordance with Article 11 of the Structural Fund Regulation;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Proposes the creation of an ERASMUS programme for regional and local elected officials;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Proposes the creation of an ERASMUS programme for regional and local elected officials;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Proposes the creation of an ERASMUS programme for local elected officials and civil servants;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas an integrated approach must
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas an integrated approach must not only take account of the economic, social and environmental aspects of territorial development, but must also serve
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas both better coordination of the relevant public policies at the various administrative levels and effective governance are essential if the sustainable development of territories is to be moved forward,
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas arrangements should be made for closer cooperation and transparency for all among the various authorities and public and private bodies involved, without necessarily transferring legal powers and without creating new
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Fa (new) Fa. Whereas partnership can bring benefits and added value to the implementation of cohesion policy through enhanced legitimacy, greater co- ordination, guaranteed transparency and better absorption of funds;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3a (new) - having regard to Article 11 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund1(hereinafter the ‘Structural Fund Regulation’), 1 OJ. L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 25.
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas the closest possible involvement of the various partners in the drafting of operational programmes will ensure the production of a document that takes full account of the specific features of a given territory and provides the best possible response to the requirements and challenges in that area,
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Ha (new) Ha. whereas effective governance can be facilitated through the use of proper spatial planning;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Hb (new) Hb. whereas the exchange of best practice is a useful tool in facilitating good governance;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas governance can only be improved and facilitated if the individuals involved in implementing cohesion policy have project management skills and if the procedure and decision-taking by the authorities is transparent,
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Ia (new) Ia. whereas weak public services with poor accessibility may lead to low public confidence, hindering participation and inclusiveness as well as their impact,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas the results of successful experiments involving new methods of governance should be drawn on in the future, including those which have already been successfully tested in European Fund programmes, such as the LEADER method and the global grant (pursuant to Articles 42 and 43 of the Structural Fund Regulation),
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas the results of successful experiments involving new methods of governance and partnership should be drawn on in the future,
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital -A (new) -A. Whereas the interest and well-being of citizens lie at the centre of European, national and regional policies, and whereas an improved level of governance and partnership, aimed at establishing an improved level of co-ordination and co- operation between the various authorities, is to the benefit of all European citizens;
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Ja (new) Ja. whereas adequate communication structures and strategies at all policy, implementation and evaluation stages, designed in close co-operation with regional and local authorities, by promoting the spread of information to all sections of society, foster transparency, inclusive participation and full ownership,
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Jb (new) Jb. whereas increased administrative and bureaucratic obligations can lead to excessively complex structures and terminology, affecting public debates and the involvement of civil society, while also hindering strategic reflection and the use of funds,
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Jc (new) Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Jd (new) Jd. whereas an enhanced partnership with universities and institutes of tertiary or technological education, as well as private sector involvement, can be beneficial to strategies within the framework of the Lisbon Agenda -,
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Je (new) Je. whereas the potential benefits deriving from Public Private Partnerships are still largely under exploited;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Jf (new) Jf. whereas partnership means taking account of all national communities and groups and their representatives,
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission, the Council, the Member States and regional and local authorities to coordinate more effectively the various Community funds (Structural Funds, Community programme for research and development, European Regional Development Fund, etc.) whose purpose is to promote regional and urban development; and, in order to achieve this higher level of coordination, recommends that regular (and at least annual) meetings take place between senior officials of national, regional and local authorities, to discuss the introduction of a more efficient system of governance and on-going and future projects in the sphere of regional development;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission, the Council, the Member States and regional and local authorities to
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission, the Council,
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the practical solutions which our fellow citizens expect to see devised for problems affecting public services (such as public transport, drinking water, social housing, etc.) can be achieved only by means of good governance, involving two complementary systems: firstly, the institutional system, which provides for the allocation of powers and budgets between the State and regional and local authorities; and, secondly, the partnership system,
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission, the Council, the Member States and regional and local authorities to link and coordinate more effectively the various Community funds (Structural Funds, Community programme for
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on regional and local authorities to step up their use of the integrated approach during the current programming period, and in order to achieve a true 'bottom-up' approach, calls upon them to investigate means to intensify their co-operation and contact with central authorities;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on regional and local authorities to
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Calls on regional and local authorities to step up their use of
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Proposes, in the context of future cohesion policy, that the integrated approach should be made compulsory; considers that the application of this principle must be undertaken within a specific timeframe to be agreed upon after consultations with each Member State separately;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Proposes, in the context of future cohesion policy, that
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the practical solutions which our fellow citizens expect to see devised for
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Proposes, for the sake of simplification and effectiveness, that a study should be carried out into the feasibility of merging the various European funds, in particular the ERDF, the ESF and the Cohesion Fund, and projects funded by the "Rural Development Regulation" under the second Pillar of the CAP, under the future cohesion policy for the period 2014-2020;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Proposes, for the sake of simplification and effectiveness, that a study should be carried out into the feasibility of merging the various European funds, in particular the ERDF
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Proposes, for the sake of simplification and effectiveness, that a study should be carried out into the feasibility of merging the various European funds, in particular the ERDF, the ESF and the Cohesion Fund, under the future cohesion policy for the period
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Proposes, for the sake of simplification and effectiveness, that
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, working together with regional and local authorities
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, working together with regional and local authorities, to examine
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission and
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, working together with regional and local authorities, to examine immediately the issue of the simplification of the procedures for implementing
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, working together with regional and local authorities, to examine immediately the issue of the rationalisation and simplification of the procedures for implementing cohesion policy with a view to reducing the bureaucratic burden on the individuals and bodies involved;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the practical solutions which our fellow citizens expect to see devised for problems affecting public services (such as public transport, drinking water, social housing, etc.) can be achieved only by means of good governance, involving two complementary systems: firstly, the institutional system, which provides for the allocation of powers and budgets between the State and regional and local authorities;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5a (new) Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the European Commission to draw up and submit to the European Parliament an assessment of the implementation of the partnership principle by the Member States in the context of the drafting of the National Strategic Reference Frameworks (NSRFs) and the Operational Programmes, identifying the factors behind successful and unsuccessful governance and to examine in particular to what extent account has been taken of opinions and proposals put forward by the partners in drawing up the operational programmes;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the European Commission to draw up an assessment of the implementation of
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the European Commission to draw up a guide designed to facilitate the implementation of effective partnerships, and to ensure stronger engagement of people and grassroots organisations in local democracy in a multi-level partnership in keeping with the institutional framework specific to each Member State;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the European Commission to draw up a guide setting out, among other things, instruments, tools and good practices designed to facilitate the implementation of effective partnerships, in keeping with the institutional framework specific to each Member State;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the European Commission to draw up a guide containing a clear definition and assessment criteria designed to facilitate the implementation of effective partnerships, in keeping with the institutional framework specific to each Member State;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the European Commission to draw up a guide designed to
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission and Council to require at least 2% of ESF resources or of technical assistance resources under all the funds to be earmarked for implementation of the partnership principle;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7a (new) 7a. Considers that more complex decision-making processes and administrative structures can place excessive demands on social partners and relevant NGOs;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7a (new) 7a. Recalls that partnership can contribute to effectiveness, efficiency, legitimacy and transparency in the operation of Structural Funds and to the commitment to, and ownership of, programme outputs
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that the partnership process can work only with partners which have the necessary capabilities and resources, and calls on the managing authorities to contribute to the strengthening of those capabilities by providing the partners in accordance with Article 11 of the Structural Fund Regulation, with the same information in good time as is available to the authorities and making available to them a clearly defined sum from technical assistance for training measures, for capacity building and for professionalising their partnership activities;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that the partnership process can work only with partners which have the necessary capabilities and resources, and calls on the managing authorities to
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that the partnership process can work only with partners which have the necessary capabilities and resources, and calls on the managing authorities to contribute to the strengthening of those capabilities; in particular the building up of social capital;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Notes that the partnership process can work only with partners which have the necessary capabilities and resources, and calls on the managing
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8a (new) 8a. Notes the important role that volunteering plays in the partnership process and calls on the Commission and Member States to support and facilitate the valuable work done by volunteers in contributing to this process;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8a (new) 8a. Highlights that the partnership process can only be effective if it is open and inclusive on the one hand and representative on the other hand; in this context suggests that the guide mentioned in recital 7 specifically deals with issue of partner selection;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Draws attention to the requirement to hold public consultations on the issue of programming and notes that the efforts to involve the public in the preparations for the operational programmes for the period 2007-2013 were not entirely successful; notes that in some cases this has occurred only technically, without any professional management or any serious efforts by the authorities to take on board suggestions made by participants; calls on the Commission, therefore, to identify good practices with a view to
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Draws attention to the requirement to hold public consultations on the issue of programming and stresses that the participation of regional and local authorities and of civil society helps to legitimise the decision-making process by counterbalancing any specific political influence; notes that the efforts to involve the public in the preparations for the operational programmes for the period 2007-2013 were not entirely successful; calls on the Commission, therefore, to identify good practices with a view to improving public involvement ahead of the next programming period;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Aa (new) Aa. whereas attention should be drawn to the definition of 'partnership' as contained in General Regulation No 1083/2006 on the Structural Funds, pursuant to which each Member State shall organise a partnership with authorities and bodies such as: (a) the competent regional, local, urban and other public authorities; (b) the economic and social partners; (c) any other appropriate body representing civil society, environmental partners, non-governmental organisations and bodies responsible for promoting equality between men and women;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Draws attention to the requirement to hold public consultations – including with non-governmental organisations – on the issue of programming and notes that the efforts to involve the public in the preparations for the operational programmes for the period 2007-2013 were not entirely successful; calls on the Commission, therefore, to
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Draws attention to the requirement to hold public consultations on the issue of programming and notes that the efforts to involve the public in the preparations for the operational programmes for the period 2007-2013 were not entirely successful; calls on the Commission, therefore, to identify good practices with a view to improving public involvement
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Draws attention to the requirement to
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Draws attention to the requirement to hold public consultations on the issue of programming and notes that the efforts to involve the public in the preparations for the operational programmes for the period 2007-2013 were not
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the managing authorities to inform partners of how and at what level suggestions made by them at the various stages in the structural fund programming process are taken into account;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9a (new) 9a. Calls upon the Member States to consult their citizens systematically over the preparation of cohesion policy for the 2014-2020 period;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Member States and managing authorities to involve the partners more closely in all the phases of Structural Fund programming,
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Member States and managing authorities to involve the partners more closely in all the phases of Structural Fund programming, including assessment and at meetings of the monitoring committees for the Operational Programmes; recalls the positive impact that partnership has had on the improvement of planning and implementation procedures of public administrations responsible for Structural Funds, having created a new institutional framework based on a series of co- operative networks or relations with various social and economic partners; notes that through the involvement of a broad group of participants, a wider range of expertise is available for use during the programming cycle of Structural Funds programmes which can contribute to improved effectiveness of programme development, monitoring and evaluation
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Aa (new) Aa. whereas social capital in the form of active volunteering is positively linked to regional economic growth and is an important factor in reducing regional disparities
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Member States and managing
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Member States and managing authorities to involve the partners more closely and in due course in all the phases of Structural Fund programming, including assessment and at meetings of the monitoring committees for the Operational Programmes, as well as during the drafting of tender documents, project selection and project appraisal;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Member States and managing authorities to involve the partners more closely and at an early stage in all the phases of Structural Fund programming and implementation, including assessment and at meetings of the monitoring committees for the Operational Programmes;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Title after paragraph 10 (new) and paragraph 10a (new) Tools for a successful partnership 10a. Calls on all Member State authorities responsible for implementing the Structural Fund programmes to implement partnership in accordance with Article 11 of the Structural Fund Regulation at least according to the following rules: - all partners to be selected by means of a transparent procedure, - at least those partners whose participation is laid down in Article 11 of the Structural Fund Regulation to be involved in the implementation of all Structural Fund programmes, - all partners to have the same status and voting rights in the monitoring committee, - all partners to receive all relevant documents in good time before the meeting of the monitoring committee, - the authorities to establish with the partners a transparent mechanism for responding to remarks and suggestions by the partners, - all partners to be involved in determining the criteria according to which projects are selected within the framework of operational programme measures, - all partners to be issued with the full minutes of the meetings of the monitoring committee, - all partners to receive travel expenses for participation in the meetings of the monitoring committee;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10a (new) 10a .Notes that new Member States did not fully comply with the partnership principle and therefore its introduction could gradually be reinforced as a result of both supranational and sub-national pressure.
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Urges the Member States to ensure closer cooperation between public and private sectors through the establishment of public-private partnerships to implement structural funding, with a view to increasing the implementability, efficiency and effectiveness of operational programmes;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10a (new) 10a. Stresses that the involvement of partners during the programming stage is a key condition for the successful implementation of the programmes, including the formation of public-private partnerships.
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10a (new) 10a Requests that the next Structural Funds Regulations contain specific provisions to make the application of the partnership principle legally binding, including clearly verifiable criteria as appropriate;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12a (new) 12a. Takes the view that successful multi- level governance needs to be based on a 'bottom-up' approach and hence calls on Member States (or regions) to design and implement development strategies for regions (or municipalities) whilst developing plans for Structural Funds interventions;
source: PE-409.748
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE405.961&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AD-405961_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16065&j=0&l=en
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.539New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE409.539 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE405.961&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE405.961&secondRef=02 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE409.748New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE409.748 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0356_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0356_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=16065&j=0&l=en
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20081020&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20081020&type=CRE |
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-356&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0356_EN.html |
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-356&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0356_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-492New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0492_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
REGI/6/60376New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
other/0/dg/title |
Old
Regional PolicyNew
Regional and Urban Policy |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|